Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
Reports
- ~2026-53570-73 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1405 three times in the last 5 minutes (LTA 1405, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:32, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-53542-39 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:38, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Frizian (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:57, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-53509-61 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:39, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-49009-87 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 172 five times in the last 5 minutes (Section blanking, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:13, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-53490-37 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 614 five times in the last 5 minutes (Memes and vandalism trends (moomer slang + zoomer slang), details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:41, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Warned user. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:09, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- TobyKohlhagen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1311 (LTA 1311, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 12:57, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-53655-89 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 13:15, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- TobyKohlhagen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1311 (LTA 1311, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 13:27, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-53476-41 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 14:17, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
User-reported
- 2603:7000:9DF0:3760:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) – All recent temporary accounts from this range have an obvious conflict of interest regarding the New York Young Republican Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and should be partially blocked from that article to prevent further disruption. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 06:45, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- This was in August? — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:57, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- See page history; the most recent attempt at whitewashing from this range was yesterday. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 13:40, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- This was in August? — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:57, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- 204.69.84.56 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Nettspend: Repeatedly vandalism. -Lemonaka 14:05, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- In fact is ~2026-53671-83 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and related TAs -Lemonaka 14:06, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Aktierisgustavsdominikszirneklispurgailis (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Enter yuour usernamee (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Pakisang (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "paki" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:10, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
- Officialsweetprep (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Official frankgodly (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- RowdyCDUBFanClub (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Leonardo6767 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Stanfordproductions (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Pricklypurrypurely (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- Tekta (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk / Uploads 14:11, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- YOUR MOM123456789mnjiojk (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Also a vandalism-only account, see contribs. 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk / Uploads 14:16, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Almost every change over the past few months (aside from reverts and removing protection notice) has been disruptive, even before a semi-protection of one year ended. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:00, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry crossed with COI/UPE. The exact details of how many people are involved are a bit opaque because of the sockpuppetry but it appears to be at least two, including the article subject and someone paid to edit on her behalf. They have been asked to clarify this, stop engaging in sockpuppetry, and make the necessary disclosures (see here, here, here and here) but haven't done so.
They have a good faith desire to see the article updated and to see some unnecessary person info removed from it (which has now been done); but they are not using sources, removing existing sources and relevant info without explanation, and generally being disruptive. Protecting the page might prompt them to engage in discussion and lead to a resolution of these good faith concerns. AntiDionysius (talk) 15:33, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Per the relevant AFD, this should have been salted. The original creator circumvented the AfC process and is likely UPE. Jdcomix (talk) 00:13, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A recently-registered user has made persistent low-quality edits to this page and simply restored them when they were reverted, incorrectly claiming that no explanation was given. Reverting these edits again would probably not be effective without preventing this editor from restoring them. Theemausoliam (talk) 03:59, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 10:30, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Brisbane Lions fans keep falsely claiming that this won them a premiership when it did not and keep adding it to the pages. Logged out users also keep vandalising the page with stuff about the lions such as "Lions won a prem with it" or "Lions own Wharfie Time now".
I would like to request a 3-6 month protection window while the hype from the 2026 AFL Grand Final dies down Flipstatic Energy (talk) 04:08, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing on this page and other Ahom-related pages. I think this falls under Contentious topics - South Asia. Theemausoliam (talk) 05:53, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Promotional material has been added by a number of sockpuppets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BManning08 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TheFinalCut1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Upgrader101
After these accounts were banned the same edits are now being made by temporary accounts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/~2026-50864-93 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/~2026-53104-86 Idontwantaaccount (talk) 07:06, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent removal/reversion of sourced material and continued disruption by a new user connected to the same dispute affecting other Ahom-related articles like Joymoti Konwari and Ahom kingdom. The article falls within the South Asia contentious topic, and temporary extended-confirmed protection may help prevent further disruption. Ananya Taye (talk) 07:59, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:51, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Timeline of the introduction of color television in countries and territories (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: RighteousCoyote384 ~2026-53431-36 (talk) 08:50, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: RighteousCoyote384 ~2026-53431-36 (talk) 08:50, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 11:19, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: The stones weight has recently come out as false with recent and historic evidence including this academic source Þorsteinsson, Kristleifur. "Kvíarnar á Húsafelli og aflraunasteinn séra Snorra." Eimreiðin, vol. 29, no. 3, 1923, pp. 166-173. A used by the name of pictwarrior keeps changing the weight back and saying this source backs up his weight of 409. There are no sources or evidence for that matter the stone has ever weighed that much. Can you please protect the page with the stones weight at 156 kg (346 lbs) while we get this resolved? People have gotten injured training for the false weight and we're trying to prevent that M0UNTA!n85 (talk) 12:17, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – those usernames are unique... Toketaatalk 12:41, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Toketaatalk 12:55, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent Vandalism TheRandomUsers (talk) 13:01, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism Goose4445 (talk) 13:02, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC timesink. Toketaatalk 13:09, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism TheRandomUsers (talk) 13:18, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism TheRandomUsers (talk) 13:23, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Multiple instances of vandalism in the last 24 hours. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 13:28, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC timesink. Toketaatalk 13:28, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Toketaatalk 13:29, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing TheRandomUsers (talk) 13:38, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing TheRandomUsers (talk) 13:43, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism TheRandomUsers (talk) 13:47, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. grapesurgeon (talk) 13:50, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unsourced edits/vandalism Hunterb212 (talk) 13:52, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long term BMX target since 2018. Toketaatalk 14:00, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Reason: Protection was bumped from semi to extended confirmed in 2022 after a multi-day long vandal spree waged by a known LTA through multiple throwaway accounts. In the four years since, they are seemly inactive, with their last known account discovered on July 2023 (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Awolf58/Archive). With this in mind, it doesn't seem too unreasonable to give semi another wurl. Giovanni Potage (talk) 11:39, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: No longer nessecary. The sock responsible for protection has probably moved on, judging how long their last known account has been inactive for (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stephaniemuue/Archive). Giovanni Potage (talk) 11:45, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Change “Collapse of the June ceasefire (July)” to “Collapse of the June ceasefire (20 June - 31 July)” because the June ceasefire ended on 19 June, not 30 June. ~2026-47054-03 (talk) 00:02, 23 September 2026 (UTC)
- Is a source for this already in the article? Daniel Case (talk) 02:34, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
OpenAI has decided to pause its training on all versions ~2026-50272-23 (talk) 15:48, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
- Source? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Look out it's Jimothy! 16:36, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
- --~2026-50272-23 (talk) 18:07, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
Change FAR right to Right ... The Conservative party are left of centre (net zero, DEI and weak immigration are all left-wing ideologies) Labour are hard left, Reform are just right.
I will be contacting Reform as a paid up member of the party to see this action is done. ~2026-53584-34 (talk) 12:20, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Got any sources for what you claim? — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:23, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Gowrishankar SRG (Kannada actor) Abdul Salam Haldar (talk) 14:06, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 15 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 13:01, 5 October 2026 (UTC) |
| 25 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 14:12, 5 October 2026 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
I have created a range of articles in the past (mostly short biographies of scholars and clergy, along with a few conversions from the National Dictionary of Biography). These have not given rise to any substantial issues, and it occurs to me that it is probably not a good use of patrollers' time to have to review any articles I may write in future, given the backlog. I am a longstanding editor, and as a reasonably experienced NPP reviewer I am thoroughly familiar with the BLP and notability policies. Dionysodorus (talk | contribs) 22:21, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
I plan to replace archive.today or other deprecated archives with web.archive.org, for which AWB would be more than useful. 🐠 formerly U.T. 08:34, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
Want to start with typo-fixing to get a feel for AWB, then do other things like creating talk pages and such :3 pattersonuwu njz (talk) 19:26, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting AWB/JWB access to assist with repetitive maintenance edits such as fixing wikilinks, formatting, and other routine cleanup. I understand that I am responsible for reviewing every edit and following the AWB guidelines. I am still building my editing experience and would like to use JWB carefully for appropriate repetitive tasks. YusHau (talk) 21:05, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
I plan to semi-automate some typo fixes that I have already been making manually. I have completed several hundred of these edits, mainly removing incorrect spaces between the last word and the following punctuation mark. I would like to request AWB/JWB access, as these tools would be very useful for handling this type of repetitive maintenance work more efficiently. My intended workflow is to identify the relevant cases, apply the correction, review the result, and save the edit. I understand that I remain responsible for reviewing every edit and for following the AWB/JWB guidelines. I am still building my editing experience and intend to use JWB carefully and only for appropriate repetitive maintenance tasks. Score Beethoven (talk) 09:47, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
I'd like to fix typos, add navboxes, and do other basic tasks. Thanks! Helpful Cat🐈 09:37, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
I want to use AutoWikiBrowser to speed up my deorphaning process as well as for general maintenance tasks. Script7921 (talk) 14:26, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
I'd like to use the script mainly for deduping refs because after installing duplicate-references.js it seems Wikipedia is lousy with them. == Peter NYC 20:55, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
|---|
Confirmed |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
I am requesting the restoration of my Extended Confirmed rights. My previous request from September 6th wasn't approved by voorts based on generic claims ("This request seems LLM-generated to me" and "There are several AI tells in your request"), but when I explicitly asked what those tells were, no explanation or text examples were provided. I need to state clearly again: I do not use AI. English is not my native language, and my use of dictionaries and Google Translate to verify phrasing is what triggers false positives on automated detectors. This is not the first time this has happened to me, and I face a lot of unfair suspicion on Wikipedia as a result. Ignoring a non-native speaker's explanation and leaving generic AI accusations unexplained does not align with community values. A major reason I need this permission is to access the Content Translation tool. I have manually translated and created over 30 articles on this wiki, and not having this tool limits my ability to contribute. I have carefully reviewed past administrator feedback regarding extended confirmed requirements after a revocation and implemented them before submitting this request. Following the expected standard, I have focused strictly on manual, constructive work in the mainspace. Since losing the permission (at around 560 edits), I have made over 570 additional manual, documented, and productive edits in the mainspace, bringing my current total to over 1,130 edits. My recent notable contributions include researching and creating Non ædificandi from scratch and expanding Impasse Florimont, which was manually cleaned up, reviewed, and upgraded to B-Class status. I am NOT using LLMs. I am a REAL human editor who wishes to continue contributing to the English Wikipedia, and I am asking to please restore my Extended Confirmed rights. Thank you. The Regulator 1 (talk) 11:53, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator
I am requesting event coordinator rights to organise and manage on-wiki events using the Event Registration tool. I am conducting different wikipedia workshops for teachers and students. I document these programmes on Meta-Wiki. I also coordinate editing activities that need participant registration and tracking. Akbarali (talk) 18:01, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
I have now done quite a lot on AFC and reviewed quite a few articles, showing that I understand content policies. Furthermore, if you look at my interactions, you can see that I have always acted civilly and resolved any disputes. From my Counter Vandalism Work, you can see that I always inform a user when I revert their edit; the same happens with AFC (through the AFC helper). I would primarily like this role as a counter-vandalism tool so that I can remove pages that are obviously vandalism, as I think that this is an important thing to do. I would also review other pages in order to help ease the backlog. I would finally like to thank anyone who reviews this request. Cheers,
hi, I would like to renew my NPP rights witch are about to expire. Different articles were reviewed over the last month, often after I added additional refs, images, or added/rephrased some text. After my adjustments, a few articles also got reviewed... by others :o) _regards Haggis MacHaggis (talk) 18:29, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
I have granted this right for three times for short time. 1, 2 and 3
I had been granted NPP in the past so that I may serve in the September 2026 Backlog Drive. I am re-requesting NPP permissions so that I may continue working on the NPP queue. I quite enjoyed my time working on the backlog drive, and got a good number of reviews done. I am also currently an AfC reviewer, and have worked on a large number of articles within the AfC queue. Thanks in advance :) 「Norellia.sh」(talk) 18:16, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
Good day. My name is Critical Hippo. I have contributed over 400 edits. I believe I have gained sufficient experience to patrol articles. The exemplar article I'd like to submit in consideration of my request is TV Edwards. I believe this article demonstrates the high quality contributions I have made to the platform. I would like to extend my contributions to the platform through reviewing and supporting others to improve their contributions. Thank you for considering my request. Critical Hippo (talk) 19:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights: I have been editing since January 2025 and have over 1600 edits, among them 16 new articles that I wrote. I have also contributed to AfDs and DYKs and am familiar with Wikipedia guidelines and policies. I would like to help new editors improve their newly added content to Wikipedia and reduce the backlog of new articles. Lynngol (talk) 08:44, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
I am currently a temporary new page reviewer, but it seems this is about to run out. I am looking to extend for longer (hopefully indefinitely). WikipediholicRat (talk) 14:48, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
I believe I am eligible to obtain reviewer status. My account is over the minimum of 90 days old (been here since December), and has a history of I believe at least 500 undeleted edits (reaching around 6000 edits in general in total). I have also not engaged in incivil behavior to others, and I understand WP's policies in regarding matters. One mistake I made prior to submitting a request here, was that I declined one draft myself without knowing you needed to apply first until now. Will this exempt me now from being able to review? Please let me know. Thank you for taking your time. Sharkeston (talk) 17:20, 4 October 2026 (UTC) |
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
Hello I would like to have pending changes reviewer rights, I routinely edit on my account with 500 edits in the past 3 weeks. I also have never participated in vandalism and routinely make productive edits. I have read Policy On Vandalism, Policy On Copyright, and I understand that I must obtain a neutral point of view and the guideline on reviewing. I request these services to help me expand my reach and find new ways of editing and helping Wikipedia. My limited services right now mainly include linking articles and welcoming new users. Thank you for your time and generosity! EzYop (talk) 01:58, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
I sometimes run into articles with pending changes while monitoring recent changes, and it could be helpful to be able to accept or decline them. I already have Rollback rights. Thanks. PeterCooperJr (talk) 02:12, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Ivebeenhacked. I have about 16,900+ edits and am familiar with the Wikipedia policies highlighted in WP:PCCRITERIA. I edit almost everyday in Wikipedia by correctly reverting vandalism, disruptive edits, and am competent in correcting incorrect information in articles. I'm confident I can be a great reviewer. Thank you. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:59, 30 September 2026 (UTC) |
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
Reason for requesting rollback rights: I would like to use huggle to revert vandalism in a quicker manner as i find wp:twinkle a bit too slow sometimes and would like too see if I would prefer huggle or other similar editing tools. Jabba550 | ✉ in solidarity 13:52, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights: I’ve been an RC patroller for better part of a year now. Rollback rights will help me counter vandalism more effectively, especially when I have to undo contributions of editors with a disruptive editing history, editors with single-purpose COI accounts, and editors who have been blocked. I’d also like to use the suite of tools that rollback rights come with including CVPI and Huggle. I will not use rollback rights to settle content disputes (I don’t get into many either way). I hope that my main space contributions so far, and my experience with the platform + RC patrol will attest to my intentions. Thanks! Baberoothless (talk) 15:46, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
I'd like rollback rights in order to make recent change patrolling easier with tools such as Interceptor. Celjski Grad (talk) 16:59, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
I am planning to use WP:Interceptor and I believe rollback would make reverting vandalism more efficient. I believe that I meet the recommended (edited) criteria listed above. Thank you for processing my request! 16dvnk (talk) 05:20, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
Previously had this as a temporary right for fighting vandalism with Huggle. Had a bit of a wiki-break but keen to revisit this. Thanks! sksatsuma 14:19, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights Hi, I would like the rollbacker right to more efficiently fight vandalism. As it is required for many counter-vandalism tools such as Huggle. I have experience in Recent Changes patrol. I also have moderation experience elsewhere. Thank you, Strongshorts (talk) 13:02, 30 September 2026 (UTC) Strongshorts (talk) 13:02, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting rollback rights So that AI Model articles can be as high quality as possible CharlieRidesRollerCoasters (talk) 13:45, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
I would like rollback to handle obvious vandalism more efficiently. I enjoy monitoring for spam, unconstructive edits, and talking to/notifying newer editors . I have read WP:ROLLBACK and will not use the default rollback summary on good-faith or disputed edits. Thanks. DocLG (talk) 22:47, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
Hello again! My name is LuigiMcpe4549. I would like to request rollback rights. That is because I have done some good edits and revert some vandalism on Wikipedia. I think that it is useful in case of crazy vandalism. It's ok if my application is denied again like last time. Cheers! :) LuigiMcpe4549 (talk) 15:06, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
I'd like to have rollback permissions so I can utilize tools like AntiVandal to help out with recent changes patrol. Justcgi (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2026 (UTC) |
| Requests for temporary account IP viewer |
|---|
Temporary account IP viewer
I do a good amount of vandalism reverting, which some of the vandals that I deal with are multiple different temporary accounts vandalising pages in short periods of time. It would be nice to know if they are using the same IP address, so that why I can appropriately report the vandals to AIV. I promise that I will not inappropriately use the tool. MathMan4 (talk) 18:21, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
I have been editing here for 20 years with a clean record. Nowadays, I mostly work in anti-vandalism and anti-UPE. In line with that, I do a lot of work at SPI. I feel that this right would help make sure that my SPI and AIV filings are accurate before submitting them. I assure you that this right won't be used for any purpose that is contrary to the terms. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:12, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
I'm experienced in reverting & reporting vandals, so I think having this right would allow me to investigate more edits done by the same vandal (or disruptive editor), or maybe reporting multiple TAs of the same person. Edit: Yes, I agree to use it accordingly with the foundation's guidelines, FYI. Jako96 (talk) 13:51, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
I have brought a number of sockpuppet investigations, and also been involved with some LTAs using a set of IP ranges. I think one of these has returned, but can't bring informed AIV or SPI cases as I cannot tell which of the socks this relates to. Likely to be useful in future SPI and LTA abuse at AfD too. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 13:53, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
I'm an established vandalism fighter patrolling recent changes and reporting temporary accounts to WP:AIV. I've been dealing with an incident of a user possibly using multiple temporary accounts to disrupt Wikipedia, so I would like to see the information of what IP addresses they have been using. Eyesnore talk💬 16:33, 3 October 2026 (UTC)
|
Usage
{{Admin dashboard/header}}
{{Admin dashboard/ab}}
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}}
{{Admin dashboard/csd}}
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}}
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}|
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}|
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}|
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showawb|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showawb}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}|
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showevco}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}|
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}|
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}|
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}|
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}|
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}|
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }}{{#if:{{{showtaiv|}}}|
{{!}} showtaiv {{=}} {{{showtaiv}}} }}
}}
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|no}}}}}<!--
You can re-arrange the order or pick and choose by transcluding elements separately -->
Note that directly transcluding the template or using all the subtemplates above can cause the page to exceed the post-expand include size.
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely sure of purpose at this time. | String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show temporary account IP viewer | showtaiv | Allows hiding the requests for temporary account IP viewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |