Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion

"WP:RFD" redirects here. For other uses, see WP:RFD (disambiguation).

XFD backlog

V	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Total
CfD	24	15	56	0	95
TfD	0	0	23	0	23
MfD	0	0	2	0	2
FfD	0	27	21	0	48
RfD	0	0	38	0	38
AfD	0	0	0	0	0

Redirects for discussion (RfD) is the place where potentially problematic redirects are discussed. Items usually stay listed for a week or so, after which they are deleted, kept, or retargeted.

• If you want to replace an unprotected redirect with an article, do not list it here. Turning redirects into articles is wholly encouraged. Be bold!
• If you want to move a page but a redirect is in the way, do not list it here. For non-controversial cases, place a technical request; if a discussion is required, then start a requested move.
• If you think a redirect points to the wrong target article, this is a good place to discuss the proper target.
• Redirects should not be deleted just because they have no incoming links. Please do not use this as the only reason to delete a redirect. However, redirects that do have incoming links are sometimes deleted, so that is not a sufficient condition for keeping. (See § When to delete a redirect for more information.)

Please do not unilaterally rename or change the target of a redirect while it is under discussion. This adds unnecessary complication to the discussion for participants and closers.

Current and past redirects for discussion (RfD) discussions

Current discussions

Redirects that have been nominated for discussion are indexed by the day on which they were first listed.

• 1 October (Thursday)
• 30 September (Wednesday)
• 29 September (Tuesday)
• 28 September (Monday)
• 27 September (Sunday)
• 26 September (Saturday)
• 25 September (Friday)
• 24 September (Thursday)

Old discussions

After 7 days, nominations that have finished their discussion period are eligible to be closed following the deletion process.

Before listing a redirect for discussion

Please be aware of these general policies, which apply here as elsewhere:

• Wikipedia:Redirect – what redirects are, why they exist, and how they are used.
• Wikipedia:Speedy deletion – which pages can be deleted without discussion; in particular the "General" and "Redirects" sections.
• Wikipedia:Deletion policy – how we delete things by consensus.
• Wikipedia:Guide to deletion – guidelines on discussion format and shorthand.

The guiding principles of RfD

• The purpose of a good redirect is to eliminate the possibility that readers will find themselves staring blankly at "Search results 1–10 out of 378" instead of the article they were looking for. If someone could plausibly enter the redirect's name when searching for the target article, it's a good redirect.
• Redirects are cheap. They take up little storage space and use very little bandwidth. It doesn't really hurt things if there are a few of them scattered around. On the flip side, deleting redirects is also cheap because recording the deletion takes up little storage space and uses very little bandwidth. There is no harm in deleting problematic redirects.
• If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no discussion after at least 7 days, the default result is delete.
• Redirects nominated in contravention of Wikipedia:Redirect will be speedily kept.
• RfD can also serve as a central discussion forum for debates about which page a redirect should target. In cases where retargeting the redirect could be considered controversial, it is advisable to leave a notice on the talk page of the redirect's current target page or the proposed target page to refer readers to the redirect's nomination to allow input and help form consensus for the redirect's target.
• Requests for deletion of redirects from one page's talk page to another's do not need to be listed here. Anyone can remove the redirect by blanking the page. The G6 criterion for speedy deletion may be appropriate.
• In discussions, always ask yourself whether or not a redirect would be helpful to the reader.

When to delete a redirect

Further information: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Common outcomes and Wikipedia:Moving a page § Moving over a redirect

The major reasons why deletion of redirects is harmful are:

• a redirect may contain non-trivial edit history;
• if a redirect is reasonably old (or is the result of moving a page that has been there for quite some time), then it is possible that its deletion will break incoming links (such as links coming from older revisions of Wikipedia pages, from edit summaries, from other Wikimedia projects or from elsewhere on the internet, do not show up in "What links here").

Therefore consider the deletion only of either harmful redirects or of recent ones.

Reasons for deleting

See also: Wikipedia:Speedy deletion § Redirects

You might want to delete a redirect if one or more of the following conditions is met:

1. The redirect page makes it unreasonably difficult for users to locate similarly named articles via the search engine. For example, if the user searches for "New Articles", and is redirected to a disambiguation page for "Articles" (itself a redirect to "Article"), it would take much longer to get to the newly added articles on Wikipedia.
2. The redirect might cause confusion. For example, if "Adam B. Smith" was redirected to "Andrew B. Smith", because Andrew was accidentally called Adam in one source, this could cause confusion with the article on Adam Smith, so the redirect should be deleted.
3. The redirect is offensive or abusive, such as redirecting "Joe Bloggs is a Loser" to "Joe Bloggs" (unless "Joe Bloggs is a Loser" is legitimately discussed in the article), or "Joe Bloggs" to "Loser". (Speedy deletion criterion G10 and G3 may apply.) See also § Neutrality of redirects.
4. The redirect constitutes self-promotion or spam. (Speedy deletion criterion G11 may apply.)
5. The redirect makes no sense, such as redirecting "Apple" to "Banana". (Speedy deletion criterion G1 may apply.)
6. It is a cross-namespace redirect out of article space, such as one pointing into the User or Wikipedia namespace. The major exception to this rule are the pseudo-namespace shortcut redirects, which technically are in the main article space. Some long-standing cross-namespace redirects are also kept because of their long-standing history and potential usefulness. "MOS:" redirects, for example, were an exception to this rule until they became their own namespace in 2024. (Note also the existence of namespace aliases such as WP:. Speedy deletion criterion R2 may apply if the target namespace is something other than Category:, Template:, Wikipedia:, Help:, or Portal:.)
7. If the redirect is broken, meaning it redirects to an article that does not exist, it can be immediately deleted under speedy deletion criterion G8. You should check that there is not an alternative place it could be appropriately redirected to first and that it has not become broken through vandalism.
8. If the redirect is a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name that is not mentioned in the target, it is unlikely to be useful. In particular, redirects in a language other than English to a page whose subject is unrelated to that language (or a culture that speaks that language) should generally not be created. (Implausible typos or misnomers are candidates for speedy deletion criterion R3, if recently created.) The message template {{subst:not mentioned}} may be useful.
9. If the target article needs to be moved to the redirect title, but the redirect has been edited before and has a history of its own, then the title needs to be freed up to make way for the move. If the move is uncontroversial, tag the redirect for G6 speedy deletion, or alternatively (with the suppressredirect user right; available to page movers and admins), perform a round-robin move. If not, take the article to Requested moves.
10. If the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject.
11. If the redirect ends in "(disambiguation)" but does not target a disambiguation page or a page performing a disambiguation-like function (such as a set index of articles). Speedy deletion criterion G14 may apply.

Reasons for not deleting

However, avoid deleting such redirects if:

1. They have a potentially useful page history, or an edit history that should be kept to comply with the licensing requirements for a copy or merge (see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and Wikipedia:Merge and delete). On the other hand, if the redirect was created by renaming a page with that name, and the page history just mentions the renaming, and for one of the reasons above you want to delete the page, copy the page history to the Talk page of the article it redirects to. The act of renaming is useful page history, and even more so if there has been discussion on the page name.
2. They would aid accidental linking and make the creation of duplicate articles less likely, whether by redirecting a plural to a singular, by redirecting a frequent misspelling to a correct spelling, by redirecting a misnomer to a correct term, by redirecting to a synonym, etc. In other words, redirects with no incoming links are not candidates for deletion on those grounds because they are of benefit to the browsing user. Some extra vigilance by editors will be required to minimize the occurrence of those frequent misspellings in article text because the linkified misspellings will not appear as broken links; consider tagging the redirect with the {{R from misspelling}} template to assist editors in monitoring these misspellings.
3. They aid searches on certain terms. For example, users who might see the "Keystone State" mentioned somewhere but do not know what that refers to will be able to find out at the Pennsylvania (target) article.
4. Deleting redirects runs the risk of breaking incoming or internal links. For example, redirects resulting from page moves should not normally be deleted without good reason. Links that have existed for a significant length of time, including CamelCase links (e.g. WolVes) and old subpage links, should be retained in case there are any existing links on external pages pointing to them. Please tag these with {{R from old history}}. See also Wikipedia:Link rot § Link rot on non-Wikimedia sites.
5. Someone finds them useful. Hint: If someone says they find a redirect useful, they probably do. You might not find it useful—this is not because the other person is being untruthful, but because you browse Wikipedia in different ways. Evidence of usage can be gauged by using the wikishark or pageviews tool on the redirect to see the number of views it gets.
6. The redirect is to a closely related word form, such as a plural form to a singular form.

Neutrality of redirects

Just as article titles using non-neutral language are permitted in some circumstances, so are such redirects. Because redirects are less visible to readers, more latitude is allowed in their names, therefore perceived lack of neutrality in redirect names is not a sufficient reason for their deletion. In most cases, non-neutral but verifiable redirects should point to neutrally titled articles about the subject of the term. Non-neutral redirects may be tagged with {{R from non-neutral name}}.

Non-neutral redirects are commonly created for three reasons:

1. Articles that are created using non-neutral titles are routinely moved to a new neutral title, which leaves behind the old non-neutral title as a working redirect (e.g. ClimategateClimategate → Climatic Research Unit email controversy).
2. Articles created as POV forks may be deleted and replaced by a redirect pointing towards the article from which the fork originated (e.g. Barack Obama Muslim rumorBarack Obama Muslim rumor → deleted and now redirected to Barack Obama religion conspiracy theories).
3. The subject matter of articles may be represented by some sources outside Wikipedia in non-neutral terms. Such terms are generally avoided in Wikipedia article titles, per the words to avoid guidelines and the general neutral point of view policy. For instance the non-neutral expression "AttorneygateAttorneygate" is used to redirect to the neutrally titled 2006 dismissal of U.S. attorneys. The article in question has never used that title, but the redirect was created to provide an alternative means of reaching it because a number of press reports use the term.

The exceptions to this rule are redirects that are not established terms and are unlikely to be useful, and therefore may be nominated for deletion, perhaps under deletion reason #3. However, if a redirect represents an established term that is used in multiple mainstream reliable sources, it should be kept even if non-neutral, as it will facilitate searches on such terms. Please keep in mind that RfD is not the place to resolve most editorial disputes.

Closing notes

Details at Administrator instructions for RfD

Nominations should remain open, per policy, about a week before they are closed, unless they meet the general criteria for speedy deletion, the criteria for speedy deletion of a redirect, or are not valid redirect discussion requests (e.g. are actually move requests).

How to list a redirect for discussion

STEP I.	Tag the redirect(s).   Enter {{subst:rfd|content= at the very beginning of the redirect page you are listing for discussion and enter }} at the very end of the page. Please include in the edit summary the phrase: Nominated for RfD: see [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion]]. Please do not mark the edit as minor (m). Save the page ("Publish changes"). If you are unable to edit the redirect page because of protection, this step can be omitted, and after step 2 is completed, a request to add the RFD template can be put on the redirect's talk page. If the redirect you are nominating is in template namespace, consider adding |showontransclusion=1 to the RfD tag so that people using the template redirect are aware of the nomination. If it is an inline template, use |showontransclusion=tiny instead. If you are nominating multiple redirects as a group, repeat all the above steps for each redirect being nominated and specify on {{rfd}} the nomination's group heading from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
STEP II.	List the entry on RfD.  Click here to edit the section of RfD for today's entries. Enter this text below the date heading: {{subst:Rfd2|redirect=RedirectName|target=TargetArticle|text=The action you would like to occur (deletion, re-targeting, etc.) and the rationale for that action.}} ~~~~ For this template: Put the redirect's name in place of RedirectName, put the target article's name in place of TargetArticle, and include a reason after text=. Note that, for this step, the "target article" is the current target of the redirect (if you have a suggestion for a better target, include this in the text that you insert after text=). Please use an edit summary such as: Nominating [[RedirectName]] (replacing RedirectName with the name of the redirect you are nominating). To list multiple related redirects for discussion, use the following syntax. Repeat line 2 for N number of redirects: {{subst:Rfd2|redirect=RedirectName1|target=TargetArticle1}} {{subst:Rfd2|multi=yes|redirect=RedirectName2|target=TargetArticle2}} {{subst:Rfd2|multi=yes|redirect=RedirectNameN|target=TargetArticleN|text=The actions you would like to occur (deletion, re-targeting, etc.) and the rationale for those actions.}} ~~~~ If the redirect has had previous RfDs, you can add {{Oldrfdlist|previous RfD without brackets|result of previous RfD}} directly after the rfd2 template. If appropriate, inform members of the most relevant WikiProjects through one or more "deletion sorting lists". Then add a {{subst:delsort|<topic>|<signature>}} template to the nomination, to insert a note that this has been done.
STEP III.	Notify users.   It is generally considered good practice to notify the creator and main contributors of the redirect(s) that you nominate. To find the main contributors, look in the page history of the respective redirect(s). For convenience, the template {{subst:Rfd notice|RedirectName}} ~~~~ may be placed on the creator/main contributors' user talk page to provide notice of the discussion. Please replace RedirectName with the name of the respective creator/main contributors' redirect and use an edit summary such as: Notice of redirect discussion at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion]]. Notices about the RfD discussion may also be left on relevant talk pages.

• Please consider using What links here to locate other redirects that may be related to the one you are nominating. After going to the redirect target page and selecting "What links here" in the toolbox on the left side of your computer screen, select both "Hide transclusions" and "Hide links" filters to display the redirects to the redirect target page.

Current list

October 1

Cornell Chi Phi Rape Allegations

• Cornell Chi Phi Rape Allegations → 2024 Cornell University rape allegations  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect was left after Cornell 7 was moved to this improper title, nothing links to it and seems unhelpful. OrderlyOhioan (talk) 16:57, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Speedy keep good faith nom per WP:CHEAP; also, redirects from page moves are generally kept besides exceptional circumstances (move vandalism, a very unclear name, etc.). — Knightoftheswords(talk) 18:01, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

2021 Kharkiv mayoral election

• 2021 Kharkiv mayoral election → Ihor Terekhov#2001 Kharkiv early mayoral election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Makes no sense to redirect an election article to the winner uk:Вибори мера Харкова 2021 AINH (talk) 05:11, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Ihor Terekhov#Mayor of Kharkiv. Signahistar (talk) 13:00, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Mayor of Kharkiv#2021 election; we don't seem to have an article about the election per se, but at least this section gives the results. Rosbif73 (talk) 13:29, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Where to retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Epicgenius (talk) 14:49, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Mayor of Kharkiv#2021 election per Rosbif73. Kelob2678 (talk) 16:59, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Semitic Pagan deities

• Semitic Pagan deities → Canaanite Religion  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Nominating Semitic Pagan deities for: deletion, move to Semitic pagan deities, and/or target change to Ancient Semitic religion.

Deletion reason:

• unused: redirect is not used, except on one user's talk page, on Wikipedia, despite existing for over 20 years.
• article-capable: as per WP:RDELETE redirect namespace (with appropriate titling) could arguably be made into a WP:LIST type article as per Aztec deities (redirects to List of Aztec gods and supernatural beings, or general article as per Ancient Egytpian deities, Shinto gods (redirects to Kami)).
• arguably confusing: as per WP:RDELETE, redirect is to a specific pagan tradition (Canaanite religion), despite broader implication of namespace title.

Further considerations:

• for: does not seem likely to be be accidental link given scant use, but metrics to contrary welcome;
• for: a proper article created in namespace would not be a duplicate as per above;
• against: might aid search, though a target change would be needed, as 236 views have been recorded since January 1 2020 as per pageviews.

Move reason:

• violates WP:SENTENCECASE: "pagan" should be lower-case.

Target change reason:

• topical scope: redirect to Canaanite religion ostensibly relates to a subtopic of the broader issue of Semitic paganism, and so a redirect to a laterally equivalent issue (Semitic religions) is preferable; presumably, one using such general nomenclature specifically wants information targeted at the general level, lest they would have searched for more specific nomenclature.

Summary: Redirect Semitic Pagan deities should be either deleted or moved, and if moved then likely retargeted, for title violations and ambiguity.— Preceding unsigned comment added by HiddenHistoryPedia (talk • contribs) 14:52, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of History-related AfD discussions. 14:32, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Paganism-related AfD discussions. 14:32, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related AfD discussions. 14:32, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Thomas & Friends voices.

• Thomas & Friends voices. → List of Thomas & Friends voice actors  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Y'all like deleting redirects with periods on the end, right? Here's another one for y'all to chew on. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:27, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Tailor Swft

• Tailor Swft → Taylor Swift  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, too many typos to be plausible. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:14, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Weak Keep I can see this as a somewhat plausible typo as only "y" and "i" have been swapped out. Servite et contribuere (talk) 15:52, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

@Servite et contribuere: The "i" in Swift is also missing. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:59, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Changing to Delete. It seems implausible considering an error occurred here when searching: . I did overlook, misread, or howvever you want to describe it and didn't notice that "i" in "Swift" is also missing. Servite et contribuere (talk) 16:35, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Alison Swift

• Alison Swift → Taylor Swift  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as a partial title match, Taylor Swift is not known by her middle name. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:13, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Delete as nom puts out, she is not known by her middle name, and this is an inappropriate usage of her middle name for a redirect, as Swift is a moderately common last name, and the family of Alison/Allison/Alyson/Allyson names is also highly common. Servite et contribuere (talk) 15:47, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Delete because Taylor Swift is not known by her middle name, and her middle name is not used on album and single covers and is almost never used in media reports and publications. I hardly doubt that readers search for "Alison Swift" when they actually look for "Taylor Swift", or that they want to type all three names but accidentally miss the word "Taylor". Marval4787 (talk) 17:07, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Patient Zero (album)

• Patient Zero (album) → Taylor Swift  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Patient Zero (Taylor Swift album) → Patient Zero (song)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Patient Zero is not an album; it's a song/single on an extended version of The Life of a Showgirl. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:09, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

• Delete both of these implausible redirects when no such album exists, and songs are a separate thing that shouldn't be treated as synonymous. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 17:05, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Mother Hubberd

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Perfect Kind of Us

• Perfect Kind of Us → No Angels discography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target, and I cannot find a connection either from search engines. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 15:25, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, it apparently doesn't exist.

Tbhotch^™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 19:44, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per other editors' findings --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:27, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: Mentioned at No Angels discography#Singles, though I can't verify the sources - one is German but doesn't mention this phrase in English, and the other link drops me in what is clearly the wrong place. Rusalkii (talk) 04:48, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A mention has been added, but verification remains a question.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 13:53, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

I am Adolf Hitler!

• I am Adolf Hitler! → Darth Vader vs. Hitler  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• I am Adolf Hitler → Darth Vader vs. Hitler  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Lyric not mentioned at target, hardly seems unique to target. ~ A412 ^talk! 05:08, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• ...delete per nom, and as not even the right punctuation in the context of the lyric consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 14:34, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment I bundled I am Adolf Hitler as well. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 17:43, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete both. Confusing and unhelpful. Not obvious that it is a lyric. Unlikely that it is a lyric that anybody would search for. --DanielRigal (talk) 18:22, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep - given how the lyric has stuck around as a meme, I think there is merit to keeping the redirect. The song's page maybe should get an addition talking about such meme usage. (However, given that such meme usage section isn't currently present, this is not a hill I'm willing to die on) LincolnMagnus (talk) 02:30, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 13:50, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Craig Tomashoff

• Craig Tomashoff → Caragh Donley  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of a Craig Tomashoff in the article. I did some research before nominating this and it does not seem like these two people are connected to one another. The article mentions Caragh being trans, however upon checking the sources, Craig's name does not appear to be mentioned anywhere. I also checked Google and did not find anymore information. Delete Gavetheman555 (talk) 16:00, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Craig Tomashoff was Donley's deadname and what she went by most of her career. Here is her LinkedIn ("Caragh Donley Tomashoff") and her Facebook where she openly posts about coming out and her career. At the bottom of her op-ed with The Huffington Post (I Hid My True Identity For Decades. Here's What Happened When I Finally Revealed Myself At 63.), it states "She’s the author of The Can’t-idates: Running for President When Nobody Knows Your Name.", which a google search will show was written by "Craig Tomashoff" (see ). -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 16:09, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

This interview with her may also be helpful: "A few years ago, I learned that my biological dad had died before I was born but nobody ever told me. I grew up thinking the stepdad who raised me WAS my biological dad, and since he is the child of Russian immigrants, I just always assumed that made me Russian. However, after digging into all this information (it’ll all be in the book I’m trying to so…reassure me you’ll buy a copy to learn more), it turns out my real dad was from Irish stock. Hence, I wanted an Irish name and Caragh means “friend” or “beloved” in Gaelic. Plus, Donley is my real dad’s last name so I wanted to pay tribute to him that way as well." -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 16:21, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Either delete or mention in the target, readers will be as confused as nom especially given the last names differ as well. I haven't checked whether a mention is merited under WP:DEADNAME - if she went by it most of her career then it seems plausible, but as always we should lean towards excluding it if uncertain. Rusalkii (talk) 17:33, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
• What Rusalkii said. There's probably a good argument that the subject was notable pre-transition, but currently all of the sources are post-transition. We don't surreptitiously deadname people via redirects, but the redirect would be appropriate if her deadname were legitimately included in the target. pburka (talk) 19:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

She won multiple Emmy Awards pre-transition.. would that merit including her deadname? -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 13:43, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Weak keep. Someone looking for the author of The Can’t-idates: Running for President When Nobody Knows Your Name would type in her deadname. They should be directed to the article that contains the pertinent information on this author. Fits under Template:R from birth name. Katzrockso (talk) 04:08, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 13:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Air Korea

• Air Korea → Jin Air  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

"Air Korea" is not mentioned anywhere on this page. Judging by the history, it was a placeholder name before the airline commenced operations, but was never used. In my opinion this redirect is confusing and unhelpful, its far more likely people would be looking for Korean Air although I don't know if that would be an appropriate target either. Cubnorth (talk) 10:55, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

• Following a bit of googling (e.g. ) Air Korea was founded by Hanjin Shipping and it looks like it became part of Korean Air. So pick your redirect! Certainly the existing redirect is not correct. --10mmsocket (talk) 11:11, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

  Looking at the page revision it does appear like it was the initial name of Jin Air but nobody is searching that now. I think a disambiguation between Korean Air and Air Koryo might be the best bet? Cubnorth (talk) 11:48, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

  As the original creator of the redirect, I agree time has passed this by and making this a disambig page or straight up redirecting to Korean Air is the best option. Asamboi (talk) 13:15, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Mileva

• Mileva → Ethinylestradiol/cyproterone acetate  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is apparently one of 80+ brand names for the target, but a search shows that several other articles that "Mileva" may refer to. Mathguy2718 (talk) 06:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Zlatina

• Zlatina → Chasselas  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target, and search shows that this isn't particularly likely to refer to the current target even if a mention is added. Mathguy2718 (talk) 06:35, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Not mentioned in the article, doesn't add any usefulness. - In solidarity, UtherSRG (talk) 14:04, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Baja Surfing

• Baja Surfing → Baja California peninsula  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mention in the target A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Gummadi Anuradha

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

MOS:DISCOGSECTION

• MOS:DISCOGSECTION → Wikipedia:WikiProject Musicians/Article guidance#Discography section  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Contrary to what the misuse of a "MOS:" prefix here implies, the target page isn't actually from the WP:Manual of Style (MOS), and there is no benefit of misleading people into thinking they'll go to a MOS page when clicking this shortcut. WikiProjects are very much a separate entity and it shouldn't be treated as synonymous or on similar levels to that. It is best to delete when I cannot think of any viable alternative for a retarget. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:25, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: MOS:DISCOGRAPHYMOS:DISCOGRAPHY points to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists of works#Discographies, so retargeting there could be an option. LazyLune (talk • edits) 03:56, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

• In that case, I'm fine with such a retarget. Thanks for providing a good link. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 04:04, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

• It's my pleasure. LazyLune (talk • edits) 05:35, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Peter Ticktin

• Peter Ticktin → Alina Habba  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This currently blue-linked name gives the mistaken impression that there is some content regarding subject. Space4Time3Continuum2x ended this redirect's 27 February 2026 edit summary with the words, "Don't know why this redirect was done in the first place". Since this redirect provides no content regarding subject, it should be deleted. The name would be more intuitively situated without a link or as a redlink. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:33, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

• Comment the target page actually does mention the name under its "Since 2022" section with the sentence "Two months after issuing that decision, Middlebrooks sanctioned Trump's lawyers, including Habba, Michael T. Madaio, Peter Ticktin, and Jamie Alan Sasson." SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:33, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

• After that sentence got deleted from Habba's article, rendering the target placement implausible, I'll vote delete as an unhelpful redirect that isn't likely to tell readers much about him. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 12:15, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:RETURNTORED. The current target provides no information about Ticktin other than a mention of his name. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:36, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. I came upon the original redirect at New York investigations of the Trump Organization which doesn't mention Ticktin at all since he didn't represent Trump or the Trump Organization in that case. Ticktin was one of four lawyers who represented Trump in his Florida lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, John Podesta, and others. I just removed the names of the three non-notable lawyers, including Ticktin, from Alina Habba's article. Ticktin is a conspiracy theorist and 2020 election denier who knows Trump from high school (military school); he's been practicing law in southern Florida since around the time Trump bought Mar-a-Lago but that's about the extent of his notability or lack thereof so far. Space4TCatHerder🖖 09:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

September 30

Chizza

• Chizza → Operations of KFC by country#India  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article. Just blabbering about KFC India. Bryce M (talk) 12:30, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep This is, in fact, mentioned in the article. | One Reaction was here. Got a complaint? 14:05, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment: Per this Allrecipes article, the menu item first launched in the Philippines before being brought to other countries, so despite currently being mentioned in the section, there's not really a strong affinity between the item and KFC India. It might be better to add a mention in KFC#Products and retarget there. मल्ल (talk) 03:35, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chess enjoyer (talk) 23:06, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Template:Relist

• Template:Relist → Template:XfD relist  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This template name is a common typo for {{reflist}}, leading to XfD relist notices being displayed where they should not be displayed, with no indication that this is an error. I recommend that either (a) something clever be done to display an error message when this template name is used, or (b) this redirect be deleted and not recreated after all 100+ transclusions have been replaced (manually) with the correct template, and scripts have been updated as needed (I don't see any recent script-based placement of this template, but it might be hiding somewhere). – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:40, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

• I note that none of the transclusions are in article or wikipedia namespaces (apart from a single occurrence in an old RfD); almost all are in user sandboxes or user subpages entitled "citing sources", created with the edit history "automatic post as part of sandbox guided tour". I can't quickly find where the sources for that guided tour live, but I assume that the typo existed in a previous version and has now been fixed. Assuming that to be the case, delete to avoid future recurrence. Rosbif73 (talk) 08:32, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

  I found the guided tour and walked through it. It recommends "Reflist" but may have had a typo in the past (it's run a bunch of JavaScript that I didn't have access to). Also, the recommendation in the tour required/requires new editors to manually type "Reflist" into the Visual Editor template selection dialog, which may have been subject to error. Without a bunch of further research, I don't know if the errors were caused by a typo in the JavaScript instructions or by editors making typos. Given the volume of errors, I suspect the former. In any event, "relist" seems like a likely typo for "reflist" and does not appear to be used by XfD, which is all or mostly script-driven anyway, so a shortcut template name should not be needed. [Caveat: This whole talk page post contains a bunch of guesses and surmises. Actual facts are welcome.] – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:51, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

• Delete seems a very good and neat solution. SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:51, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Are you coming to the tree

• Are you coming to the tree → The Hanging Tree (The Hunger Games song)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of these words in target article - if they are a key part of the lyric this needs to be added and source. PamD 22:23, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Adams-Taylor House

• Adams-Taylor House → Richmond Hill (Richmond, Virginia)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article: houses associated with Adams are mentioned, nothing of this name. PamD 22:03, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

The following lines refer directly to this house, as outlined in the cited NRHP nomination: "By 1844, the court clerk, Palmer, owned the house, which he sold in 1859 to William Taylor. Taylor transformed the house into an Italianate-style brick and stucco mansion. The building grew from six to 20 rooms, as well as added another storey." The NRHP refers to this building as the Taylor-Wilkins House; both are listed as aliases in the associated Wikidata item Kobenon (talk) 22:18, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

But there is nothing in the article to identify anything as "Adams-Taylor House". PamD 05:48, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Line of dialogue

• Line of dialogue → Line (poetry)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Current target is especially surprising/misleading. Other possibilities would be things like Dialogue in writing, Screenplay, etc, but my inclination here would just be to delete as somewhat vague and an unlikely way to search for anything specific. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 20:51, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Too vague, the search function needs to be allowed to do its job and that includes deleting redirects that are of no clear help to anyone. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:36, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Infinites

• Infinites → Avengers Infinity  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Seems too vague to redirect to a comic book page. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:08, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to Infinite (disambiguation) as {{r from plural}}. External search results for "infinites" are very mixed on my end; I don't see a primary topic there. Scholar results show this is widely used in mathematical contexts as a synonym for infinite numbers, often contrasted with infinitesimals. Internal search results are equally mixed, including philosophical and mathematical references to the general concept (eg. "Cantor's method of infinites", references to "arithmetic of infinites" in the works of Thomas Taylor, etc.), in addition to a couple mentions of Marvel's "Infinites" and the short story The Infinites. If there's no primary topic for the singular, I doubt there's one for the plural. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 20:00, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

2026 United States broadcast television realignment

• 2026 United States broadcast television realignment → The CW  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is not specific to The CW, nor is it covered at the target as far as I can tell. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:00, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to 2026 in American television § Stations changing network affiliation. The Nexstar reduction in affiliation is covered at August 1 in that section as is the completion of the Nexstar/Tegna acquisition completion at March 19 in the same section. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 18:43, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
• A terrible title that I doubt needs a redirect target anywhere, but 2026 in American television § Stations changing network affiliation is as good as any option to retarget. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 07:16, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

HBO Max Corporation

• HBO Max Corporation → HBO Max  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Max Corporation → HBO Max  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

HBO Max is a streaming service, not a corporation, so there is no "HBO Max Corporation". Home Box Office, Inc. is the "HBO Corporation", but HBO Max is run by Warner Bros. Streaming so it would not make sense to retarget these. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:58, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

HBO Max+

• HBO Max+ → HBO Max  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• HBO Max Now → HBO Max  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• HBO Max Forever → HBO Max  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• HBO Max Gold → HBO Max  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Max Now → HBO Max  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

As a follow up to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 20#HBO Max redirects, here are some more speculative or made-up names for HBO Max by the same creator. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:50, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Religious epic

• Religious epic → Epic film#Biblical epics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete unless a suitable alternative target can be found. I'm not convinced that films are the primary topic for religious epic(s). There is no substantive discussion of this subgenre in the target article. Note: I have intentionally not bundled this with Religious epic filmsReligious epic films because there may be a distinct target for the literary genre. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 02:02, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to List of religious films or Category:Religious epic films. Goustien (talk) 05:27, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

  List of religious films may be suitable although unfortunately the epics are not distinguished in any way. I would object to Category:Religious epic films as an WP:XNR with no justification given that there is an equivalent main space list available to target. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 13:23, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

• Most epic poetry is religious. It might not be a terrible target. J947 ‡ ^edits 23:36, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

  I had the same thought though unfortunately the article does not discuss it. I also wondered if myth/mythology might be suitable. This looks to me like a topic that *could* be discussed on any number of pages but isn't, and is not an exact synonym for any of the various pages though there is substantial overlap. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 15:50, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  There's also Religious text but that's not a great fit. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 15:51, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:25, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, I see a few targets that are okay at best but I'm not seeing anything good enough that I'd be happy to recommend. Epic (genre) is probably the closest in my opinion, but I can't even tell if the scope includes Epic poetry or is simply influenced by it. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:11, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 17:49, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Foundations of Geometry

• Foundations of Geometry → Foundations of geometry  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• The Foundations of Geometry → Hilbert's axioms  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Another book titled The Foundations of Geometry is described at Gilbert de Beauregard Robinson. Probably Hilbert's axioms is still the primary topic for the latter one and a hatnote could suffice, but I am less sure about what to do with the former one. 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:51, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:19, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Weak keep Foundations of Geometry as a capitalization variant (though my second choice would be to retarget to the proposed dab). Disambiguate The Foundations of Geometry between the book by Hilbert and the book by Gilbert de Beauregard Robinson and possibly the Foundations of geometry article (though my second choice would be to keep it and hatnote to the book by Robinson instead). Duckmather (talk) 02:43, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 17:48, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

N−1

• N−1 → Pocklington n − 1 primality test  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• P−1 → Pollard's p − 1 algorithm  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• P + 1 → Williams's p + 1 algorithm  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

These random snippets of mathematical notation occur in countless places. There is no reason to think that a person putting them in the search bar would be looking for these particular, rather obscure, targets, as opposed to n+1, N-1 Victory, Kawasaki P-1, etc. In the case of n - 1, the title of the article didn't even include this phrase until the redirect creator added it last week. --JBL (talk) 22:30, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

See P − 1 and P+1, which are created by others. Athina241 (talk) 00:04, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

I would also support deleting those, for the same reasons. --JBL (talk) 17:04, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget N−1 to N1, and P−1 to P1. Both of those disambiguation pages already include "-1" variations. No opinion on P + 1. BD2412 T 13:11, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

  Both proposed retargets are reasonable. --JBL (talk) 18:57, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:41, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Cyberservices

• Cyberservices → E-commerce  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Cyber service → Virtual volunteering  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Neither of the targets mentions this term. Online serviceOnline service redirects to Online service provider, so that might be an alternative. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to List of computer security companies, which includes a list of computer security services (also known as cybersecurity services). It also includes a link to "computer security", where multiple mentions of "cybersecurity" can be found, leaving readers to not be surprised. LazyLune (talk • edits) 09:11, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• It's easy to find sources saying that "cyber service" means virtual volunteering, so if it is retargeted, we should add a hatnote. Disambiguation is an option. Oppose retargeting to List of computer security companies, which is certainly too narrow a topic (cybersecurity as opposed to online services in general). Neither of the titles under discussion mention security. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 20:05, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
  • It's easy to find sources saying that "cyber service" means virtual volunteering
    It largely depends on the scenario here. In this case, cybersecurity seems more applicable here. Search results yield sources pertaining to said topic. In addition, "cyberservice" is a used initialism for "cybersecurity services".
    Neither of the titles under discussion mention security.
    May you provide some further context to this part of your rationale here? I'm having a bit trouble understanding what you're fully saying, as the articles I mentioned both cover security (although I will say that "Cybersecurity" is more informative about it than "List of computer security companies"). LazyLune (talk • edits) 23:43, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:40, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

2028 AFL season

• 2028 AFL season → Australian Football League  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Way too soon, even for a redirect. 2027 season hasn't even started. The 2026 AFL Grand Final only happened 4 days ago. And a redirect probably isn't the best thing here. Delete per WP:RETURNTORED to encourage article creation. Servite et contribuere (talk) 12:16, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete as this entry does not meet the criteria set out in WP:FUTUREEVENT. Qwerty123M (talk) 12:40, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Dick Cock

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete

Utility guy

• Utility guy → Utility player  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Would be a bit surprised if led to the current target by this title. My first thought would be 'utility worker' (as in e.g. Utility Workers Union of America); anecdotally used, for example, "when is the utility guy supposed to be here?" If this too vague (and perhaps uncommon) to be useful? — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 12:00, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Yeah, too vague and informal. I also would have thought of utility worker. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 20:20, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

LaLiga 123

• LaLiga 123 → Segunda División  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Name not mentioned in target. Highly unlikely for the Segunda División to be called like that. — SimpleObjects-9ei 🍂/🌰/🤗 (see talk) 11:34, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Full face

• Full face → Portrait painting#full face  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

My first thought is something along the lines of moon face in regard to this term. Apparently it is a common descriptor of helmets as well. Should this remain targeted to portraiture? — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 11:22, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. Moon face doesn't work since it's a medical symptom, whereas this is more about face shape ("a full face"). I haven't been able to find a Wikipedia article about face shapes, surprisingly. The section "face shape" redirects to is vague, oddly technical, and doesn't discuss particular commonly used expressions like 'round', 'square', 'full', 'gaunt', etc. faces. There's nothing there that would be helpful to a reader searching for the topic.

As far as I'm aware full-face masks/helmets aren't just called "full faces" so those topics are only partial title matches for Motorcycle helmet § Full face helmet, Full-face diving mask, Full-face snorkel mask, etc. Disambiguation isn't needed for PTMs. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 14:05, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

A job

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 7 § An acequia – delete all
• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 3 § A human – no consensus

• A job → Job (role)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• A dog → Dog  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No particular affinity for 'a' or 'an' with regard to these titles than any other target which could be preceded by them (e.g. A cat, A car, or An apple). — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 10:42, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

I personally searched for this term when trying to wikilink "job" - the top search results (using visual editing UI) doesn't include the article.

The "a" is there to identify the word as a common noun.

"A dog" is unnecessary because there's nothing to disambiguiate - there's only one dog. "Job" is one hell a word to disambig. 海盐沙冰 _{/ aka irisChronomia / Talk / Uploads} 10:46, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

On my end the top native search hit is (seemingly far-and-away, but I can only speculate) is Job, which lists Job (role) prominently. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 10:56, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

It does - but it is kinda annoying to have to click into a disambg page before returning and searching for the actual target. (It's kind of like just opening a new tab and Googling for the Wikipedia article).

But I don't mind if we delete it - it's likely not a big deal in any case. 海盐沙冰 _{/ aka irisChronomia / Talk / Uploads} 11:01, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Lean delete. "A job" is justifiable on the basis that it's an obvious and natural way to search directly for job (role) without going through a disambiguation page. "A dog" shows non-negligible traffic suggesting people do use it. However, previous discussions noted that titles that unnecessarily include an indefinite article ("a"/"an") crowds up searches for unrelated titles. (See All pages with titles containing a job and All pages with titles containing a dog for examples.) These targets are not difficult to find, so I'm not yet persuaded that an exception should be made for these. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 13:38, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep, agreeing with "A job" is justifiable on the basis that it's an obvious and natural way to search directly for job (role) without going through a disambiguation page. They're also harmless. -- Tavix ^(talk) 13:56, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Any generic noun can take the indefinite article, and there's nothing particularly special about these that there should be redirects with them. Really the only time you'd have "A dog", etc, is if it were the title of a work or something like that. But nothing at either disambig page fits here. Nor should we be making or keeping redirects for an apple, a tree, a socket wrench, or however many other hundreds of thousands of these there are. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 20:31, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete both as... more vague than i initially expected. kind of obviously, uses for those are primarily mid-sentence (for which there's plenty of consensus to not do 'round these parts), but in both of those cases, they obscure other titles with this name (like a job to do and a dog of flanders), of which there aren't few of. even ignoring that, the odds of it being an unfinished or misplaced search term are high, meaning that even if those redirects were to exist, it's unlikely that good targets for them exist besides search results consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 20:45, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete both per WP:RFD#D1 as they obscure searches for other titles starting with these words, and per the consensus from the 2019 RfD listed above. Rosbif73 (talk) 09:34, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: These just add clutter. - In solidarity, UtherSRG (talk) 14:02, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

White people food

• White people food → Food trends  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unmentioned at the target. Chinese Wikipedia describes a fascinating concept of a 'white meal' or 'white people food' as a trend of sorts (if my translation tool is working okay), but we do not seem to cover this anywhere. Mayhaps we cover this in another sense (even stereotypical) somewhere? Otherwise, probably best to return to red. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 10:22, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

The person who kicked off the trend (fad?) in mainland China seems to have been Briton Old Dry Keith, although Canadian sources are also mentioned in the zhwp article. I've heard of this distinction before in a conversation about funeral potatoes although obviously that's not citable. Arlo James Barnes (pro-∪nion) 10:32, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Jeez. I'm learning about the place I live in via English Wikipedia now. Will go and check. 海盐沙冰 _{/ aka irisChronomia / Talk / Uploads} 10:49, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Checked - I think we can replace the redirect with an actual translation from zhwiki page. The term is more of a meme / cultural phenomenon than a genuine food trend. Am tagging it for translation. 海盐沙冰 _{/ aka irisChronomia / Talk / Uploads} 11:07, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to Stereotypes of white Americans. This expression and the stereotypes associated with it predate the Chinese meme. Searching "white+people+food" on Google and setting it to filter for results from before 2019 (an arbitrary pre-meme date) yields thousands of results. See, for example this article: "For children of immigrants, trying ‘white people food’ is a rite of passage" (Lee, 2015; The Globe And Mail) (for an Asian migrant perspective) or this article: "‘White People Food’ Is Creating An Unattainable Picture Of Health" (Aiken, 2018; Huffington Post) (for an African American perspective). Most pre-meme results are North American in origin, which makes sense since in Europe the stereotypes North Americans associate with "white people food" (bland, lack of spices, burgers, mac'n'cheese, etc.) are generally associated with Northern European cuisines, and there's a much stronger sense that there are distinct regional and national cuisines rather than a homogeneous "white" food culture. The stereotypes usually relate particularly to White (North) American food, though naturally this overlaps with stereotypes about eg. White British food.

Stereotypes of white Americans briefly discusses these stereotypes with reference to the Chinese meme/trend:

White people are also stereotyped to have no culture and do not season their food.[7][8] In 2023, Chinese people made fun of white people on social media for eating bland foods such as raw salads, boiled eggs, chicken breast, sliced ham, and bologna sandwiches by calling it the "lunch of suffering", contrasting it with the rich and spicy Chinese cuisine.[9]

The exact phrase "white people food" isn't used in the text, but is used by some of the articles cited so a mention could be added if other editors feel it's necessary. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 12:19, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Support retarget per above. It definitely has a broader meaning than the Chinese meme (which could potentially be translated with a disambiguated title, if deemed notable for our purposes). Until/unless someone decides to write a spinoff article the stereotype seems like the closest fit since there is direct mention of the term (and the meme).

If no consensus for retargeting, support deletion instead. Current redirect definitely isn't appropriate. ChompyTheGogoat [ Bleat | Munched ] 14:36, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Consortium Book Sales & Distribution

• Consortium Book Sales & Distribution → Ingram Content Group  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. PARAKANYAA (talk) 06:37, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep? Mentioned at source Cxbrx (talk) 10:49, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

  It's not in the article; we don't link every non-notable company related to any other company. They have been part of several different companies. PARAKANYAA (talk) 13:08, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:32, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Next Year (song)

• Next Year (song) → Next Year  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Should this ambiguous redirect continue pointing to the primary topic, Next Year, when Next Year (Foo Fighters song) is already a viable redirect and the article Next Year (Macklemore song) already exists alongside song redirects for entries listed at Next Year (disambiguation)? Consensus at Talk:Next Year#Requested move 19 September 2026 is in favor of the Foo Fighters song being the primary topic. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 17:36, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per the recent discussion at Talk:Next Year#Requested move 19 September 2026, which concluded that the Foo Fighters song is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the title. If that consensus changes, this redirect should be revisited. - Eureka Lott 01:55, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:31, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Ulr

• Ulr → Ullr  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• ULR → Phenylpropanolamine  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned, though other articles like Ulrichite and Liberal-Republican Union mention these terms. Mathguy2718 (talk) 06:36, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Also, Ulr is not a valid alternative spelling of the name Ullr. He can be called Ull (without the -r nominative case ending), but not Ulr. Delete that one. -- Supermorff (talk) 09:12, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Disambiguate ULR. Could refer to the targets mentioned in nomination, as well as Université de La Rochelle or Accident management#Uninsured loss recovery. Katzrockso (talk) 04:11, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:31, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

• Disambiguate ULR. Ultra-long-range is another possibility. Delete Ulr as an implausible typo for Ullr. Rosbif73 (talk) 12:10, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Camille, Louisiana

• Camille, Louisiana → Delcambre, Louisiana  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

While it seems that per GNIS this is in Delcambre, it's not mentioned at the target and without a mention it's arguably more confusing to users than it is helpful. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 18:53, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Vermilion Parish, Louisiana#Unincorporated communities: where it is mentioned. Just a bare list entry, but tells you where it is and gives you information about the general locality. Rusalkii (talk) 22:10, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:29, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

English city names

• English city names → List of names of European cities in different languages  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Seems like a rather strange target. Just because a city is not in Europe doesn't mean that there isn't a name in English. English exonyms provides some non-European examples of city names that are different in English. Lists of cities would be more general, including English names based on endonyms, though on the English Wikipedia, any lists of cities would be presumed to list city names in English. Also, English citiesEnglish cities redirects to City status in the United Kingdom, which doesn't list that many city names, but List of cities in the United Kingdom (of which List of cities in EnglandList of cities in England redirects to) mentions that there are 55 cities in England. Mathguy2718 (talk) 04:57, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Weak retarget to List of cities in England, maybe? Candidyeoman55 (talk) 16:28, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Weak delete as ambiguous given a DAB might not make sense given how vague it is. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:29, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Toponymy of England, which covers English place names. - Eureka Lott 01:47, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:27, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to List of cities in the United Kingdom, to sync with List of cities in England. The list there gives the names of every city in England as a sortable table. Admittedly the list also includes Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, but it can be sorted by statistical region which groups them in a way that makes finding just the English ones straightforward. Seems good enough to me. If others would prefer something better, it wouldn't be difficult to add another sortable column to sort by constitutent country. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 09:50, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Minefield (trunk build)

• Minefield (trunk build) → Firefox  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target. Go D. Usopp (talk) 03:46, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• I think a more applicable target would be Firefox version history? Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 03:52, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  A quick Google search of the redirect's name shows no mentions of Firefox, so probably not. | One Reaction was here. Got a complaint? 19:48, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any thoughts on the proposed target?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:27, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete Implausible search term. | One Reaction was here. Got a complaint? 19:49, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Firefox version history and add a mention there: "Minefield" was the early name for Firefox's nightly builds from the development trunk, subsequently renamed "Firefox nightly". Rosbif73 (talk) 06:47, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Chris Ahuja

• Chris Ahuja → 2026 United States House of Representatives elections in California#District 32  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Political candidate in 2026_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_California_(districts_27–52)#District_32 and 2024_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_California#District_32, neither is a primary topic. मल्ल (talk) 03:45, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Generally, it has been my understanding that candidates in a particular district tend to redirect to that election. If they are a perennial candidate, perhaps readers would be better off with the search results, but I would support Keep for 2026 here. PickleG13 (talk) 21:53, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:27, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to 2026 United States House of Representatives elections in California (districts 27–52)#District 32, because the list has since been split. Non-notable political candidates who have run multiple times should be redirected to their most recent campaign. The 2026 election notes his 2024 run, but the 2024 election does not note his 2026 run (and it would be anachronistic to do so). -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:30, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Arthur Dixon (American Politician)

• Arthur Dixon (American Politician) → 2026 United States House of Representatives elections in California (districts 27–52)#District 34  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Political candidate who has ran in 2026_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_California_(districts_27–52)#District_34 and 2022_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Texas#District_30, neither of which is the primary topic. मल्ल (talk) 15:55, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• I created an original redirect for this candidate, when the 2026 election was ongoing. I did not redirect it to its current destination, which was redirected by User:Ahecht. I don't have much of an opinion here, since the candidate was not particularly notable, but generally redirecting to the most recent election is helpful for readers. PickleG13 (talk) 21:55, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• This is an ambiguous title that can refer to multiple people. Retarget to the disambiguation page at Arthur Dixon as a {{r from incomplete disambiguation}}. - Eureka Lott 14:30, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:24, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, implausible due to the miscapitalization in the disambiguator. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:32, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Joe Kerr

• Joe Kerr → 2026 United States House of Representatives elections in California (districts 27–52)#District 40  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 7 § Joe Kerr – retarget to Joseph Kerr (disambiguation)

Political candidate who has ran in 2026_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_California_(districts_27–52)#District_40, 2024_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_California#District_40, and 2022_California_State_Senate_election#District_38, neither of which are a primary topic. मल्ल (talk) 16:11, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• retarget back to the dab, essentially per the previous rfd consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 17:35, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

  incidentally, mild opposition to adding this joe to the dab, in absence of an article about him. but that's not too important to this rfd, so eh consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 17:46, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:24, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

SuMo

• SuMo → Sumo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

per history, it's either a somewhat implausible camelcase redirect, or a less implausible but also sorta niche abbreviation of pokémon sun and moon (seen primarily around smogon circles that don't abbreviate them as "sm"). i'll suggest retargeting back as the path of least resistance consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 19:03, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:05, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

  @Lenticel the nom is not suggesting deletion, did you mean retarget per nom or ? Rusalkii (talk) 04:45, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

• Deletion for me since it's an implausible camelcase redirect. Weak retarget to Pokémon Sun and Moon as a very far second choice --Lenticel ^(talk) 07:08, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:24, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

a delete could still be per nom in this case, since the abbreviation is on the niche side consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 11:05, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

They hit the pentagon

• They hit the pentagon → American Airlines Flight 77  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• They hit the Pentagon → American Airlines Flight 77  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Quote not mentioned in target (there might be a big edit later, but I'm RfD'ing this for now) — SimpleObjects-9ei 🍂/🌰/🤗 (see talk) 19:38, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete. This was a practical joke that I made to demonstrate the misuse of editing on Wikipedia to my classmate. Although, I do wonder if it counts, considering there's a Wiktionary entry for the exact phrase referring to this event. AladdinC (talk) 19:42, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• soft redirect to wiktionary per above. also creating and bundling the version with a capital p (disgusting!!) consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 20:20, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

  😐 AladdinC (talk) 18:46, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

  "do non-delete thing per delete vote" is a more common occurrence than it probably should be, and it's funny almost every time~ consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 00:40, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  brunnam u gtta be shittin me 🫩🫩🫩 AladdinC (talk) 16:07, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:23, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Elon Musk's submarine

• Elon Musk's submarine → Tham Luang cave rescue#Elon Musk  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Musk's submarine → Tham Luang cave rescue#Elon Musk  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This redirect has an interesting history. The page at this title was an article for 11 days in August 2018 (a month after the actual cave rescue occurred), whereupon it was redirected to Elon Musk#Tham Luang cave rescue. After that, FWDekker retargeted it to Elon Musk#Tham Luang cave rescue and defamation case in 2020; Cewbot retargeted it to Elon Musk#Tham Luang cave rescue & defamation case in 2022 (which Tallungs reverted); I retargeted it to Tham Luang cave rescue in 2025. Last but not least, starting a few minutes earlier, today Moonraker12 tried four different targets: Elon Musk#Tham Luang cave rescue and defamation case, Legal affairs of Elon Musk#Tham Luang cave rescue and defamation case, Tham Luang cave rescue, and Tham Luang cave rescue#Elon Musk.

As that discussion reveals, we have three different articles on Wikipedia this redirect could possibly target where the submarine was mentioned - Elon Musk, Legal affairs of Elon Musk, and Tham Luang cave rescue - and no consensus on which one to send the reader to. Any thoughts? Duckmather (talk) 23:29, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• I am leaning retarget to Legal affairs of Elon Musk#Tham Luang cave rescue and defamation case. It looks the best well-written out of the three (albeit not by a wide margin) and provides clear navigation to Tham Luang cave rescue. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 00:11, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
• I'm questioning if this redirect should exist at all. But if it should, the target should be either Tham Luang cave rescue#Elon Musk or Legal affairs of Elon Musk#Tham Luang cave rescue and defamation case.
  I'm leaning towards the latter, because of Musk's narcissism, making himself the central point of the situation. Elon Musk made sure the submarine ordeal was about Elon Musk. It had little to do with the actual Tham Luang rescue. - Manifestation (talk) 08:27, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note I bundled in Musk's submarine as well, as they should have the same target or if one is deleted then the other should be as well. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 16:16, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
• I don't think the redirect is necessary. The redirect's title is a misnomer: The linked-to sections aren't about the submarine but about the legal issues surrounding it. The redirect is also not in an appropriate category (I think): It's currently in Category:Redirects to related topics, but it's not so much about a related topic as it's just a phrase you might think of when searching for more information. For which there is no category, afaik. So I think the redirect should be deleted. FWDekker (talk) 18:58, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

  It's an R from merge, which must be retained for attribution purposes and may not be deleted unless the page history is moved elsewhere first. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:18, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Sorry about the mess; I came across this at Wild boar (disambiguation) as a redirect to Tham Luang cave rescue but couldn’t see it there; I intended to redirect this to Legal affairs, but got a clash notice (as Musk’s submarine redirected somewhere else), so I self-reverted. Musk’s involvement with the cave rescue anyway seems pretty minimal (or even negative), so I was considering proposing that section be summarized and merged with Legal affairs as well: The submarine itself (which was actually just some kind of capsule) is about as notable as a kayak absent of the legal fuss that accompanied it, so I suggest the redirect to Legal affairs is appropriate (It is probably worth keeping it for the edit history). OTOH Musks submarine is just duplication, with no incoming links, so if it can be deleted then do that. Moonraker12 (talk) 17:02, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Currently the most extensive coverage is at Legal affairs of Elon Musk#Tham Luang cave rescue and defamation case and Tham Luang cave rescue#Elon Musk. There may be an opportunity to better consolidate the coverage but I see this as an area where duplication is to be expected. I think it's a coin toss where to target these now. They should certainly have the same target (if neither is deleted). If the coverage is reorganized in the future then the targets may need to change again. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 15:13, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: There's also Elon Musk and the Tham Luang cave rescueElon Musk and the Tham Luang cave rescue, which should be synced to the same target. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:13, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

  That seems implausible to me as a search target, but may have been linked to at one point? Its hit count had odd spikes in October 2023, and there was a sustained increase in traffic in February 2025. Good find. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 14:21, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

  It's a more likely descriptive title that would be more suitable for a stand-alone article on the topic if it were ever to be re-created. If consensus were to deem the submarine redirects harmful (I don't think they are, by the way), then an option could be to move the page history to this title and delete the submarine redirects. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:06, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget to Legal affairs of Elon Musk#Tham Luang cave rescue and defamation case or Tham Luang cave rescue#Elon Musk?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shocksingularity (talk) 20:52, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:22, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Jukude language

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 30 § Jukude languages – speedy delete
• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 31 § Jukude language – delete

• Jukude language → Máku language  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not an attested name for the language, and deleted following prior RfD discussion 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 22:34, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Note: The previous RfD was very recent, but had no participation besides the nominator. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 22:52, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. 14 mainspace pages link to that redirect. Possibly they predate the Jukude language -> Máku language page move in 2021. The Máku language page contains "Jukude" enough times I think it's plausible someone would search that way. I know nothing about this subject, but at the least I can't support deleting it while links to it are still in use. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 22:59, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

It wouldn't be difficult to replace all those links if needed. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 23:17, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

It's not probable because the name Jukude applies only to the people, and never to the language. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 01:25, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

External search results on Google, Google Scholar, and Google Books return no non-Wikipedia hits for "Jukude+language". Results for "Jukude" alone yields results that state that this word means "person, human" (eg. ). Rogers, 2001, states:

The speakers of this language referred to themselves as jukude-itse [zokude-itse] ‘people-PL’. It is commonplace to refer to the language as Máku in the linguistic literature, reserving the autonym, consequently, for the cultural group of speakers of this language.

If I understand rightly, -itse marks this word as referring to people, so maybe without the person marker suffix the word is the native word for the language. This redirect is linked to in several articles; maybe the references in one of them can provide evidence for usage of "Jukude language" off-Wikipedia? – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 23:13, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Usage looks to be predominantly in the form of lists. Ticuna–Yuri languages#Language contact and Languages of Brazil#Classification of languages as linguistic or cultural heritage have Portuguese references. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 23:32, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

One of the pages, I've forgotten which, referenced ISBN 978-3-11-025513-3. It makes note "A number of languages have been called Makú, several of which have nothing to do with one another". So we must be careful not to get Máku language and Makú language muddled, as Ctrl+F can ignore diacritics. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 23:52, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

@Scyrme The term "Jukude" is definitely not the native designation for the language. It is the designation for the people though. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 01:22, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Why "definitely"? You have sources that say so? – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 01:31, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

@Scyrme Check the grammars of the language and see if the name "Jukude" is used for the language. I couldn't find anything. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 16:54, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

The closest I found using "Jukude" and not "jukude-itse" (people) was a German source. Note that I have only had success in accessing this link on mobile - desktop browsers just give me an "Access is temporarily restricted" screen - so you can try mobile or find it on another website (what I like about ResearchGate, when it lets me in, is it doesn't require login):

Kolonialitäten und tribale Zonen. Koch-Grünbergs Beziehungen im Feld während der Roraima-Orinoco-Expedition by Ernst Halbmayer (July 2023), Philipps University of Marburg

It reads: "Die Selbstbezeichnung der Gruppe war Jukudeitse und die Sprache Jukude." Which Google Translates to: "The group's self-designation was Jukudeitse, and the language was Jukude." Interestingly, it (or its quoted passages) seems to use the term "Máku" to refer to the people, contrary to the Máku language page:

Drei Porokotó und einen Máku haben er und seine Henkersknechte mit der Rifle erschossen.
He and his henchmen shot three Porokotó and one Máku with the rifle.

Wie Koch-Grünberg festhält: »Die Unterhaltung meiner Leute dreht sich jetzt beständig um die ›wilden Indianer‹, Waiká […], die diese Gegend gerade in der jetzigen Zeit gern zu Überfällen (um Mitternacht) auf die durchreisenden Majonggóng und Máku benutzen sollen« (VII: 10).
As Koch-Grünberg notes: "My men’s conversation now constantly revolves around the ‘wild Indians’—the Waiká […], who are said to favor this area, especially at the present time, for launching raids (at midnight) on the passing Majonggóng and Máku" (VII: 10).

Auch »mit den Arekuna, von denen einzelne bei den Yekuaná leben, kommen Misch-ehen vor; ebenso mit den Máku am Auari« (Koch-Grünberg 1923: 351).
"Mixed marriages also occur with the Arekuna—some of whom live among the Yekuaná—as well as with the Máku on the Auari" (Koch-Grünberg 1923: 351).

I don't know if I've actually contributed anything here, just that it passed the time. Either way, my view remains that if the term "Jukude" is in use and someone might reasonably search it or follow a link using it, we should keep this. Template:R from incorrect name can be used, or Template:R from alternative name if it is less certain that name is incorrect. Template:R from move may also be suitable, although, looking at the history closer, the page only lived there from 2020-12-24 to 2021-03-08.

Only tangentially related, that is interesting this language page's moves were driven by a single user from 2011 to literally today (UTC, yesterday in the Americas). I hope they partake in this discussion. Possibly there is no definitively correct name for this language. Another idea I've just had, is to check the other Wikipedia languages for references. They all start with "jukude", "jukudea", "yukude", or Язык юкуде (which apparently is also yukude). But I have not looked into where they may have got that name from. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 18:59, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

@Here for the one billionth edit AFAIK Koch-Grünberg, who is being discussed here, only called the language "Máku". Here is his book which contains a vocabulary of it. Since the language is called "Jukude" here, I support keeping this but with the caveat of using {{R from incorrect name}}. The only name the language is otherwise called is "Máku" (though with some diacritical variation as "Makú, which is much more ambiguous). The other WP articles were probably moved by kwami per enWP usage rather than due to some reference present in the other WPs. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 13:17, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shocksingularity (talk) 20:55, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:22, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete in the spirit of G4. | One Reaction was here. Got a complaint? 19:51, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Card-en-Ciel

• Card-en-Ciel → Inti Creates  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:REDDEAL to encourage article creation. This game is notable and an article is needed, and the target does not talk about the game comprehensively so it is not useful to redirect to. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:33, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Just notified of this discussion at the target. Jay 14:48, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Since the target was recently notified.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:17, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

British cities

• British cities → List of cities in the United Kingdom  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Cities in Britain → City status in the United Kingdom  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Should they point to the same target? Jay 07:31, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Sync at City status in the United Kingdom. I see no good reason not to sync them. Looking at the "What links here?" pages for both targets, filtered to show redirects, these titles better match the other existing redirects to the "City status" article. I've added a hatnote for readers who may be using the plural to signify that they're looking for a list rather than a topic. (The alternative would require reviewing many other redirects besides the ones nominated here; simpler to just retarget 1 redirect and add a hatnote.) – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 07:51, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

I agree with Scyme's logic and conclusion. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 14:14, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Queen Mathilde

• Queen Mathilde → Queen Matilda  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Suggest retargeting to Queen Mathilde of Belgium, who is the only person on the dab page to have the given name Mathilde rather than Matilda (or Maud). Rosbif73 (talk) 06:43, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. Historically, the spellings of names were more variable and could often be inconsistent. For example, some historical sources call King Henry VIII "Harry" not "Henry". In this case, you can find some of the sources referenced for Matilda of Ringelheim using the name "Mathilde". Matilda of Flanders explicitly states in the lead that in French and Dutch her name is "Mathilde". I've not checked every person on that disambiguation page, but I assume there are more examples like this. Just because their article titles on Wikipedia use the spelling "Matilda" does not mean that the articles, or the sources they cite, or historical sources in general do so. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 06:59, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Electronic payment

• Electronic payment → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Electronic payments → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Electronic Payment → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Electronic Payments → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• EPayment → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• EPayments → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• E Payment → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• E Payments → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• E-Payments → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• E-Payment → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• E payment → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• E payments → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Epayment → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Epayments → E-commerce payment system  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• E-payment → Online Banking ePayments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• E-payments → Electronic funds transfer  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Guide to E-payments → Electronic funds transfer  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not familiar enough with the subject to know where these should go. The last one is probably not plausible (it was a page title of a subsequently BLARed page for a month in 2006). 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:59, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

No opinion on the rest but delete Guide to E-payments. ScalarFactor (talk) 18:04, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Guide to E-payments and retarget the rest to the same place, but that same place, I can't tell what the broad umbrella term article for this is. Fork99 (talk) 20:11, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on targets for non-guide redirects?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 05:41, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Internet industry

• Internet industry → Online service provider  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This term seems a lot more general, but I'm not sure what the correct target for this would be. Note that Internet industry jargon is an article, though not a particularly sourced one. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:58, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: There doesn't seem to be very many good targets for this. At best, there is History of the Internet and List of largest Internet companies, but those alone may not fully cover it. I'm inclined to say WP:RETURNTORED could potentially be valid here; this does seem like something that could be turned into a separate article, provided that there are enough reliable sources to cover the topic. LazyLune (talk • edits) 08:44, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• I think of e-commerce when I hear internet industry. The same for internet business, but that is a redirect to another target. Jay 15:32, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 05:28, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment any thoughts on a redirect to Telecommunications industry? Most internet providers like Vodafone, Verizon, Telstra, AT&T, Deutsche Telekom are classified as Telecommunications companies, but I am not voting as I would rather hear thoughts from others, but this might not be a great redirect considering companies like Google and Amazon Inc for example are also classified as Internet industry. Not so sure where to go here, but to me, I think of Telecommunications when I hear "Internet industry". Servite et contribuere (talk) 14:24, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:RETURNTORED. Electronic business (target of online business) would be a better target than e-commerce as it's broader and encompasses the latter. However "the internet industry" could also refer to internet service providers, data center infrastructure, cloud computing services/platforms like Amazon Web Services, web hosting services, and social networking services of which all contribution to the provision of the internet as we know it. (see eg. EBSCO summary for scope of meaning) Telecommunications industry is simultaneously too broad (includes non-internet telecoms) and too narrow (the article limits itself to ISPs). – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 14:58, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

TSAR

• TSAR → SAR supergroup  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• TSAR supergroup → Diaphoretickes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

These redirects should point to the same target. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 11:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment - Retargeting to SAR supergroup is my first instinct, but I notice this will create circular redirects on the SAR supergroup page. Someone with knowledge of the topic should confirm the intended destination of those [[TSAR supergroup|TSAR]] links.

Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 11:59, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

I had the same thoughts. Neither article contains a lot of substantive coverage of TSAR but SAR supergroup is the logical place where this might be expanded. The brief mention at Diaphoretickes § Evolution just says that Telonemia [...] is sometimes resolved as the sister clade of the SAR supergroup, forming the hypothesized TSAR clade. That makes Diaphoretickes an improper target to discuss TSAR on the whole. The circular link at SAR supergroup can either be removed or it can be left as an acceptable circular redirect if editors think this has standalone article potential. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 14:07, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Support retargeting TSAR to Diaphoretickes. TSAR includes groups that SAR does not, and is fully included in Diaphoretickes, the nearest parent clade. Furthermore, its validity is still unknown, as the 'T' often branches with Haptista instead of SAR. The Evolution section at Diaphoretickes covers this information. For these reasons, TSAR redirecting to Diaphoretickes is preferable, and is a surefire way to avoid misleading readers into thinking SAR and TSAR are equivalent. — Snoteleks (talk) 14:10, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Ah, I see. I think I initially misread Diaphoretickes, and did not bother to look at the taxobox. I do think the information could be presented more clearly in the article. I've followed the TSAR discussion from afar and my (limited!) understanding is that it is disputed but still felt to be relevant enough to cover somewhere. This is a bit beyond the scope of RFD but I do think the coverage could be improved while still kept fairly succinct. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 14:15, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

@Myceteae Agreed that coverage should be improved. I have added some more bits of info at Telonemid and will try to add something at Diaphoretickes itself. — Snoteleks (talk) 14:37, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Support. Jako96 (talk) 22:23, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

• Target both to SAR supergroup per my reply above. I've notified WP:PROTISTA, WP:ALGAE, WP:PLANTS, and WP:TOL to get input from subject-matter experts and would be open to amending my !vote if there are factors I've not considered. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 14:10, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

I agree with Snotelek that targeting the least inclusive group that contains TSAR is usually the best solution. But TSAR is sort of SAR sensu lato so might be a more natural place to discuss it. It's mentioned in the lede and the article could be reorganised to have a short section on TSAR that could be linked in the redirect. Likewise, Diaphoretickes could have a sections on TSAR/SAR and other component supergroups, but the article isn't organised that way. TSAR is mentioned but seems quite dismissive of the hypothesis. At the moment SAR seems a better target because the issue is addressed in the one paragraph lede.  —  Jts1882 | talk  14:39, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

This was part of the thinking that originally led me favor SAR supergroup. Either target is justifiable and the coverage could be improved in either location to better support these redirects. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 16:08, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:37, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Telonemid, where there seems to be the most coverage of TSAR. I think this makes sense, as the difference between the TSAR and SAR would be the inclusion of Telonemia. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:23, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A new target has been proposed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 05:26, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguate TSAR with Tsar and TSAR's current target, Retarget the other one to SAR supergroup. It seems plausible to me that someone looking up the first redirect could be looking for the Slavic title. | One Reaction was here. Got a complaint? 19:58, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Landphoon

• Landphoon → Derecho  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention is made. I propose either deletion, article creation, or editing of the current target to at least mention the term. ZFT (talk) 04:19, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

• There is a Wiktionary definition at wikt:landphoon. I found some Australian news sources using this term, usually putting it in quotation marks: The New Daily article Courier Mail article ABC News article. Fork99 (talk) 10:57, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the comment of Fork99
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:07, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

• It's not clear that these terms are synonymous. The links found by Fork99 do not seem to use the word "derecho", so they don't demonstrate synonymy. Wiktionary also doesn't mention that landphoons are synonyms with derechos, and defines them as tropical depressions over land whose satellite signature resembles that of a typhoon, however derecho doesn't mention anything about them having typhoon-like radar signatures. It does mention that One derecho developed a radar signature resembling that of a cyclone..., but "one" implies this is unusual not definitive of derechos. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 12:32, 9 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: Landphoon had an article at that title prior to September 2007, but it was deleted at AfD. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 12:44, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

  I've notified Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tropical cyclones of this RfD to hopefully get input from editors better informed about meteorology and tropical cyclones. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 12:41, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

  I WP:BOLDly changed the Wiktionary definition to be more in line with what the current redirect target implies. ZFT (talk) 04:23, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

  @ZFT: I might suggest changing it back or to something else. From the two Australian articles I could read (the second of the three is paywalled), they seem to be referring to tropical systems of one form or another, including a monsoonal low and a system sustained by the brown ocean effect, while the current Wictionary definition is more along the lines of a mesoscale convective vortex. TornadoLGS (talk) 05:12, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

  I restored the old definition while also keeping the new one; how's that? ZFT (talk) 05:16, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

• I see a few routes, but none of them are it remaining as a redirect to derecho. It could be turned into a disambiguation for derecho, brown ocean effect, and other terms including specific "cases". Landphoon could also be simply redirected to brown ocean effect, which seems to be the most common usage of the term based on a Google Search and others' comments in this thread. The redirect could also just be deleted due to how colloquial the term is. ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 12:20, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

  There are some unreliable references connecting landphoon and derecho that I have found. This Wikipedia article refers to a specific derecho as a landphoon. There are also a couple uses of it on social media to variably refer to BOE or derechoes, depending on the context. ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 12:28, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

  Could retarget to a visible anchor at the mention in Tornadoes of 2003:

  The derecho itself produced a very intense mesoscale convective vortex, and at times, the entire squall line was wrapped into it, creating a "super-derecho", also known as a landphoon.

  This seems to be the closest thing Wikipedia currently has to an explanation of the term. There's also a mention at International Cloud Experiment but this does not explain what a "landphoon" is beyond describing the one mentioned as "record-breaking tropical typhoon". – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 12:43, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

  I don't understand why you link to WP:BARTENDER, since these suggestions (disambiguate, retarget, delete) are all appropriate for discussing here at RfD rather than at another venue. Disambiguation pages aren't just lists of related topics, they're articles which could share the same title. Even if the brown ocean effect is relevant to landphoons, these terms are definitely not synonymous. Brown ocean effect doesn't mention "landphoon" so would likely be a surprising target. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 12:30, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

  There are several outcomes I can see, none of which are massively preferable, but the current option is not acceptable. If you disagree with my analysis of multiple possible solutions, that is fine. ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 12:56, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Support deletion per nom and ✶Quxyz✶. I see the situation on enwiki hasn't changed much from the 2007 AfD, where we cannot point it to a known definition or prevalent usage. Jay 09:22, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to wikt:landphoon, which looks to be the most helpful option. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:39, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No one seems to like the current target, but can we figure out what to do with it?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 05:13, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

atomy

• Atomy → Fairy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Atomies → Fairy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Atomie → Fairy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Atomy (fae) → Fairy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Atomy (fay) → Fairy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Atomy (fairy) → Fairy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Atomy (faery) → Fairy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Atomy (faerie) → Fairy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

rub your eyes on wikt:atomy to see that none of its definitions would necessarily narrow it down to fairies. so... uh... soft redirect to that? consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 13:25, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

• support wiktionary soft redirect per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:11, 10 September 2026 (UTC)
• Very weak retarget to Wiktionary. The obvious target is Skeleton (undead) - the word is used in this sense by Shakespeare, Dickens, and Smollett, among others - but we don't mention it on that page. Tevildo (talk) 23:39, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

  I'm not sure Skeleton (undead) would be the most obvious target since the other definition, 'mote, speck', is more common; it's ambiguous and could also probably target Particle (which the disambiguation page at mote links to for this sense of the word). According to my external search results (eg. ) Shakespeare used it in this sense too, and the glossaries in the top results don't even mention the "skeleton" sense. Wiktionary provides Shakespeare quotes for both definitions, suggesting it was ambiguous even then. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 08:11, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

• My guess is that this has come from 1.4.57 of Romeo and Juliet, where the chariot of the fairy Queen Mab is said to be "Drawn with a team of little atomies". As far as I can tell, this passage doesn't imply that "atomy" refers to fairies themselves. The OED lists the following definitions of "atomy": "An atom, a mote", "A diminutive or tiny being; a mite", "A skeleton", "An emaciated or withered living body, a walking skeleton", and "Chiefly in the work of Dickens: a spindly or skeletal thing". The Wiktionary page lists all of these meanings. I don't see a whole lot currently mentioned on Wikipedia that the term could refer to: Mnogotochie (rap group) are apparently the progenitors of an album titled Atomy zsoznaniya, but this merely seems to be because "atomy" is the Russian word for "atoms", and I suspect the mention of an "Energy Atomy School" at List of schools in Iran involves a typo or an error, as I'm unable to find anything about such a school. Other appearances of the word are either using it in one of the senses listed by the OED, or are referring to "atoms" in another language. Given all of this, I think retargeting to the Wiktionary page is a reasonable enough solution. – Michael Aurel (talk) 04:33, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

  Those mentions in the list about Iranian schools intended to mention the Atomic Energy Schools maintained by the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran. The Farsi for "Atomic Energy" is انرژی اتمی enerži atomi, which sounds like "energy atomy". I've amended the list. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 15:23, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks for confirming that suspicion, and fixing the issue. – Michael Aurel (talk) 05:35, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget Atomy and Atomies to Wiktionary, delete Atomie; atomie is not mentioned on the Wiktionary page. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 10:14, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Disambiguate between the various uses, which seems to be at least particle and skeleton (or skeleton (undead)). Atomy (fae) also exists, which could be added as well. It's preferable to stay local where feasible. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:29, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  Good catch, now bundled. --BDD (talk) 15:36, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  I meant that the usage related to fae could be added to the disambiguation page, but while we're here: Atomy (fairy), Atomy (fay), Atomy (faery), and Atomy (faerie) also redirect to Fairy. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:41, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 15:33, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Ope, several others besides the one Tavix flagged. I don't think this will be a WP:TRAINWRECK hazard, as we're really just looking at two items: with and without a fairy-specific disambiguator. N..b., The term does not appear at Fairy. --BDD (talk) 15:46, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  i would actually suggest un-bundling them if that's possible, since those are two different cases consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 16:36, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  I think it's worth having eyes on both types, since we don't mention the term on Fairy either. There is a brief entry at List of legendary creatures (A). We could have a separate discussion--my point is just as things stand, the (fae) etc. redirects are also ripe for RfD. --BDD (talk) 17:29, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment. I just noticed that while most of these have little traffic, atomy has a lot of traffic. The all-time total is >65,000 since 2015. I somehow doubt this due to readers looking for an obscure, very archaic word meaning either skeleton or mote (or, apparently, also fairy according to these redirects). I think there's something we're overlooking here.
  A quick external search for "Atomy" overwhelmingly brings up a South Korean brand/chain called 'Atomy' in English. There seems to be no coverage here on ~enwiki, but it does have an article on ~kowiki: Atomy. I'm still undecided, but my intuition is there's a WP:RETURNTORED situation here. I'm unsure if there are other meanings of the word that we're missing which would explain the high traffic. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 17:12, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

For what it's worth, there is history that could be restored, although it'd need some work. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:40, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Not sure how that would help. That article in the history is still about diminutive fairies or fairy-like beings (in Shakespeare), whereas I think the traffic is coming from various sources including possibly for the South Korean multinational company which appears to be a notable gap in coverage. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 18:10, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Gotcha. I misunderstood which use you wanted the WP:RETURNTORED for. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:15, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget Atomie to match redirect Atomie (Dungeons & Dragons). Jay 04:06, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 05:11, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Dirty Diaper

• Dirty Diaper → Fritillaria camschatcensis  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dirty diaper → Fritillaria camschatcensis  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

These redirects originate from the first revision of Fritillaria camschatcensis by @Noswald, where "dirty diaper" was listed as a common name. @Dysmorodrepanis~enwiki then created the "Dirty Diaper" redirect, and @Plantdrew created "Dirty diaper". This name was removed for being unsourced in 2022. I could not find any evidence that this plant has ever been known by that name, and so the redirects should probably be deleted. It is probably noteworthy that, Fritillaria biflora, also created by Noswald, used the same terminology (1, 2) to describe its supposed common name: It is also sometimes known as Skunk Lily, Dirty Diaper and Outhouse Lily because of the flower's horrible smell. Hopefully this makes sense, and I haven't done anything wrong, as this is my first time listing anything for discussion/deletion. JordyGrey _talk🧸 02:41, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Library of Congress seems to be listing it as a common name as of 2009 here, but that post-dates the appearance on Wikipedia. I'm not finding anything I'd consider reliable that pre-dates Wikipedia (but I haven't searched exhaustively). I think "dirty diaper" probably is a not-very-commonly-used common name for some Fritillaria species that didn't originate on Wikipedia, but Fritillaria is not the primary topic of "dirty diaper" and it isn't a particularly useful search term. Plantdrew (talk) 03:20, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Apologies, I also forgot to list Skunk Lily, Skunk lily, Outhouse Lily, and Outhouse lily. I knew I forgot something. I honestly have no idea how to add those to the listing at the top, or how to link the "subst:" template you put on the redirects to this tempalate, so if someone more experienced could help me that would be great :) JordyGrey _talk🧸 05:41, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Per Plantdrew who had originally created the redirects. - In solidarity, UtherSRG (talk) 14:26, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

  I only created the lower-case one ("dirty diaper"); I have regularly created lower-case redirects for common names of organisms when upper-case redirects already exist, without necessarily verifying that the name is attested outside of Wikipedia. Plantdrew (talk) 15:48, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Birds Of A Feather

• Birds Of A Feather → Birds of a Feather (TV series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Seems rather strange that this capitalization is specifically redirecting to the TV series, even though it has been redirecting to the same page for over five years after the target was moved to add "(TV series)" and even though the redirect got over 700 views during the 5+ years. Mathguy2718 (talk) 00:58, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Birds of a Feather to fix the strange target. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:12, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

September 29

Candle march

• Candle march → Candlelight vigil  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The word "march" appears nowhere in the target (except in access dates). Note that Candle March (film) exists and is WP:MISPLACED * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:45, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Rebel scum

• Rebel scum → Rebel Alliance  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No matter how much of a Star Wars fan you are, that doesn't change the fact that the word "scum" appears nowhere in the target. Also note that Rebel Scum (film) exists and is WP:MISPLACED. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:39, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Tragic ballad

• Tragic ballad → Murder ballad  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. Note Tragic Ballad (film) exists and is WP:MISPLACED. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:37, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Little Cocoon Nebula

• Little Cocoon Nebula → NGC 1624  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This nickname is also mentioned at Sh 2-82. Should it be disambiguated? SevenSpheres (talk) 22:25, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Support A disambiguation page sounds good to me. Minnastronomer (talk) 22:45, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Additional comment: The mention at the current target is unsourced, so retargeting is also an option. SevenSpheres (talk) 22:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

I think it comes from here. Unless another source (or souces) can be found I think it can be retargeted. Minnastronomer (talk) 03:06, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Okay, I guess that can be added to the article since the sources cited for Sh 2-82 aren't much different (amateur astrophotography websites). I don't know the origin of these nicknames so I don't have a strong opinion here. SevenSpheres (talk) 21:14, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Waseb TV

• Waseb TV → Television in Pakistan#Private TV Channels  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention at the target anymore. Was previously an article, but was blanked and redirected a few days after it was published in 2023. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 21:14, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Albumin Excretion Rate

• Albumin Excretion Rate → Albuminuria  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Neither "Albumin Excretion Rate" or "albumin excretion rate" are mentioned in this article. The only reference in Enwiki is in a citation at Complications of diabetes. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:20, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

A.M.P.

• A.M.P. → AIM (album)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Deletion, nothing links to the page, it's redirecting part of the name of an album track to the parent album, which seems pointless otherwise every abbreviation of every track on every successful album ever would require a redirect page/link and the whole thing would get cluttered up In Vitrio (talk) 14:19, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to the disambiguation page Amp, where there are multiple articles listed with the acronym AMP. मल्ल (talk) 23:06, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chess enjoyer (talk) 20:14, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Alberta Central Railway

• Alberta Central Railway → Canadian Pacific Railway  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There's no mention of "Alberta Central Railway" in this article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:45, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep as an “R with possibilities.” This was one of two duplicate railways built from Red Deer to Rocky Mountain House around 1910. ACR was an independent company for a few years before being taken over by the CPR, which ran the line until the mid 1980s when it was abandoned. Because of the controversies during its construction, it’s more notable than other prairie branchlines, and someone could find sources to develop an article. Indefatigable (talk) 22:52, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

SMI 049

• SMI 049 → Tuberculosis  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. As far as I can surmise, SMI-049 is the name given to a cluster of drug-resistant TB cases in Sweden in the 1990s. This is not discussed at the target nor at Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, nor anywhere else on-wiki. Anyone search for this is looking for specific information that we don't have and it doesn't appear that this cluster warrants special coverage on en-wiki. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 19:39, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Hand Grenade Oil Lamps

• Hand Grenade Oil Lamps → Oil lamp  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

unmentioned. this was an unsourced (and weirdly promotional) article which was merged in an afd. however, the alleged merge took nothing from the pre-blar content, and the afd had slightly stronger consensus to delete. the content was also removed a while later, but that's not that important

research of my own led to a bunch of independently-made doodads of varying lampness, and nothing of historical note consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 18:10, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

RuneScape locations

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 January 1 § Wilderness (RuneScape) → RuneScape § Wilderness – keep
• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 18 § West Ardougne – withdrawn

• RuneScape locations → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Abyss (Runescape) → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Al Kharid → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Al-Kharid → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Ardougne → RuneScape#Gielinor  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Asgarnia → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Castle Wars → RuneScape#Player interaction  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Catherby → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• East Ardougne → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Entrana → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• FaladorFalador → RuneScape#Gielinor  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Kandarin → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Karamja → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Keldagrim → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Kingdom of Asgarnia → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Land of runescape → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Lumbridge → RuneScape#Gielinor  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Misthalin → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Morytania → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Rellekka → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• RuneScape dungeons → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescape dungeons → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescape locations → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Stronghold of security → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Stronghold of Security → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Taverley → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Taverly → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Tirannwn → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Varlamore → Old School RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• West Ardougne → RuneScape#Gameplay  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Wilderness (RuneScape) → RuneScape#Combat  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Wilderness (Runescape) → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Yanille → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Zanaris → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Now that Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 4#Varrock has gone through, I would like to nominate these other RuneScape locations for deletion. You may refer to that RfD for more context. The long and short is there used to be a page about RuneScape locations, and now all we have is these redirects as they are not individually notable.

I have omitted Gielinor from this RfD, as that is the world in which the RuneScape games are set, not a city or kingdom (lore-wise, it does not include Zanaris, which is its moon, but this has no bearing on gameplay). It is mentioned at RuneScape, Old School RuneScape, RuneScape: Dragonwilds, Betrayal at Falador, and sorta kinda FunOrb. Suffice to say, that redirect is problematic in its own right, but previous attempts to spin it into its own article have ultimately been unsuccessful. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 10:11, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

These redirects should have been bundled with more care. Though the nomination implies these were all previously redirects to RuneScape locations, this is untrue. Castle Wars was an article about a minigame which was redirected to RuneScape combat so should have been bundled with that. Falador was merged directly to RuneScape#Locations according to an edit summary. though I've not checked whether it was actually merged or simply blanked and redirected. If it was merged WP:ATTREQ would require the redirect to be preserved for attribution. I don't have time to investigate the page histories of every single redirect nominated here, but I'm concerned there are other cases like the ones I've noted here. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 11:41, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, I did not mean to imply they all redirected to RuneScape locations, just that they are RuneScape locations and the majority of these stemmed from the existence of that page.

While Castle Wars is best known as a minigame, it is also a location. It later redirected to RuneScape#Player_interaction (still does - apologies for missing the anchor when making the RfD), as that is where Castle Wars was mentioned (see Special:Permalink/400431131#Player interaction, random revision from the time that section existed). The minigame certainly has a combat element but is not combat itself.

You're right that WP:ATTREQ could be a headache. It applies even though the current revision doesn't go into locations (well it does mention the Falador Massacre, but the Falador page didn't), right? Falador text was in the main page for ~10 hours indeed (Special:Diff/261069919). I could withdraw that part. The ones with simple histories like Karamja are easier to review. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 12:20, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

@Scyrme: Maybe there's a more reliable way, but I scraped RuneScape's revision history for instances of "merg" (case-insensitive). So there's that Falador edit as seen in my parent reply. Special:Diff/30426061 mentions merging King Black Dragon (relevant to the other AfD), but if you view the respective page's history it never had anything more substantial than a Wikia link, so not a content merge the revision that was merged from has already been deleted. Didn't find anything else. I see we can use Template:R from merge like Falador Massacre does. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 13:09, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

These methods aren't always reliable, especially when dealing with very old articles/revisions. Sometimes redirects from merges were not tagged with {{r from merge}} or the tag was removed because the redirect was later retargeted somewhere else. Editors don't always say in their edit summaries that they are "merging" or have "merged" content from somewhere else. Some editors neglect to say anything because they're not aware that they need to state where content came from, or they may say something like "adding content from [article]" or "incorporated text from [article]".

King Black Dragon was deleted because it was retargeted to RuneScape monsters after the merge to RuneScape. When RuneScape monsters was deleted after an AfD, King Black Dragon was left with no target and deleted, but it should not have been. I assume someone neglected to document the merge to RuneScape, so no-one noticed that it had history that needed to be preserved. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 13:31, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

I wonder if it's still possible to request undeletion after all these years? Might be too late to fix the attribution for the merge from King Black Dragon. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 13:35, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Reading the instructions, it sounds like we should ask User:Ixfd64. I am getting confused and will walk away from this for a little bit. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 14:00, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Yes, WP:ATTREQ applies if any revision of an article includes content which was copied or merged from another article, even if the copied content exists only in old revision. Attribution is required for each and every revision not just the current one.

Thank-you for look further into Falador. Since the content was merged into a previous revision of RuneScape, that redirect has to be kept. The attribution is still necessary to preserve for this revision. If any other redirects here also have content that was merged/copied elsewhere, they'll also need to be kept (unless the article/revision it was merged/copied to is also deleted). – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 13:17, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete all I have significant doubts any info contained within these could be at all pertinent to a modern article on the subject, so I think the worrying about attribution is misplaced. Even if they were merged at some point, the information was likely removed. Wikipedia is not a fan Wiki, so these are all irrelevant. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:06, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  It literally does not matter if the information was later removed in newer revisions. The old revisions are still available for anyone to read via the history page and attribution is still required as long as those revisions are not deleted. As long as the content exists in some form it's a copyright issue per the license under which Wikipedia operates. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 21:24, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  Per WP:MAD, there are alternate ways to preserve attribution if a page would otherwise be deleted, including putting the former page or its history in a subpage of the existing page. I'd support this alternate method. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:34, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  WP:MAD: ... Therefore, this approach is almost never used on Wikipedia at present. This is a rarely used method and it's unclear what the benefit would be compared to just not deleting the small number of relevant redirects and adding {{copied}} or {{merged-to}} to their Talk pages. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 23:57, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep Wilderness (RuneScape) if RuneScape combat is not deleted, as evidently some content was merged/copied prior to 30 January 2007 and attribution would need to be preserved. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 21:54, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

The Wilderness is also still discussed at RuneScape § Gameplay so it may be worth keeping anyway. Though discussed only briefly, it's more than a passing mention. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 15:11, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep RuneScape dungeons, which was merged to "RuneScape locations". However the current version of RuneScape locations is a redirect left over from a move. The article it was merged to is now in the history of Gielinor (10 September 2006). Since Gielinor is not being nominated for deletion, RuneScape dungeons must be kept to preserve attribution. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 22:10, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep Al Kharid. which was merged to "RuneScape locations", which was now actually located at Gielinor (29 December 2004). As with RuneScape dungeons, attribution must be preserved as long as Gielinor is not deleted. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 22:22, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete the rest. With the exception of Falador, which has now been withdrawn, it seems the other redirects here, where they previously had content, were blanked and redirected not merged which makes them safe to delete. There's no substantial content about these left, so there's nothing helpful to redirect to. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 22:26, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete any not singled out per Scryme above. For the cases he did single out, which were all merged into pages that are now redirects, I would prefer to handle that by doing a selective delete/undelete to bury the article revisions of the redirects, since we're establishing here they're poorly-sourced fancruft of no value to current Wikipedia. Hence we could safely Delete them too. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Likewise Delete Wilderness (RuneScape); I don't see enough substance there to really support a redirect. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:48, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

@Pppery: selective delete/undelete - Do you mean delete Gielinor and recreate it? I suppose that could work, since the relevant revisions which attribution would be needed for would no longer be publicly available. However, I didn't check whether Gielinor was merged anywhere because it wasn't nominated for deletion.

Looking into it now, it seems Gielinor (formerly "RuneScape locations") was originally blanked and redirected following an AfD which was closed as "delete" but was actually implemented as a blank and redirect to allow content to be merged from previous revisions into other articles. As far as I can those merges did not happen, which would mean it would be safe to delete except in 2024 someone attempted to write a new article at the redirect. That new article was merged into RuneScape (22 May 2024). This means that the proposal to delete the redirect and recreate it without the baggage of its former history would result in the lost of attribution for previous revisions of RuneScape. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 19:36, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Yes, that is what I meant. In theory we could delete Gielinor, and then only restore the edits that don't include the re-2008 article while still keeping the 2024 article in the history. That would be a bit of a mess, but I think it would solve the multiple conflicting goals without violating anyone's attribution. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:39, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

It does seem like Thief-River-Faller's 2024 article was a complete fresh start that didn't reuse content from the preceding revisions. I can't find any fault with it if there's no technical reason why it can't be done. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 19:56, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

I can say with 100% confidence that the software will allow an admin to do that. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:59, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Happy to support your suggestion then, and change my position to delete all per Pppery (except maybe the 'The Wilderness' redirects, as there's some info at the target about the topic. but it's not a lot so I don't feel strongly about it). – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 20:06, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

There is so much messy history from the 2000s that I'd be happy to get rid, if we can do that. If the Gielinor redirect stays, I second the 2024 article can happily live in the history as it's doing no harm. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 16:38, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Even though it won't work here, it's not an entirely bad suggestion. It could work for RuneScape armour (in the other listing), which would become safe to delete if RuneScape combat were deleted then recreated to cut loose its previous baggage. As far as I can tell, RuneScape combat was not merged anywhere. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 19:42, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep the wilderness redirects as it's discussed. Delete the rest due to the lack of mention, including the ones that Scyrme singled out for attribution reasons because no content remains extant. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:33, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: relisting to close an old (and big!) log date
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:52, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

RuneScape combat

• RuneScape combat → RuneScape#Combat  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• RuneScape weapons → RuneScape#Combat  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• RuneScape armour → RuneScape#Combat  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• RuneScape pking → RuneScape#Combat  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescape armour → RuneScape#Combat  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• RuneScape armor → RuneScape#Combat  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescape rangers → RuneScape#Combat  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• RuneScape Combat → RuneScape#Combat  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• RuneScape Player Killing → RuneScape#Player versus player combat  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescape weapon types → RuneScape#Combat  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescape weapons → RuneScape#Combat  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescape combat → RuneScape#Combat  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Nominating redirects to do with RuneScape combat for deletion as discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 6#RuneScape skills suggested this is okay. While the page discusses combat, the anchors these redirects use no longer exist and I think changing them to #Gameplay doesn't alleviate the maintenance burden. Many of these redirects have history from people writing about these subjects, which was later merged or removed as not individually notable. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 10:11, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete all We don't have this kind of stuff for literally every video game, so we shouldn't have it for RuneScape. It's redundant, unnecessary, and the search works just as well. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:08, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete most. A few of these had content, but in most cases it was blanked and redirect not merged so there are no attribution issues to worry about. RuneScape weapons was seemingly merged into RuneScape Items, which has since been deleted so there doesn't appear to be an attribution issue here either.
  Keep/refine RuneScape combat (and Runescape combat) to RuneScape § Gameplay as this topic is still discussed and there's no reason not to assist readers in finding this coverage.
  RuneScape armour was merged into RuneScape combat (13 November 2006) in several successive edits. If this is closed as delete for RuneScape combat, it would be safe to delete RuneScape armour. If it is kept, RuneScape armour must also be kept to preserve attribution, and the merge should be documented at Talk:RuneScape armour. (This makes this a de facto keep RuneScape armour from me, given my view on RuneScape combat.) – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 21:30, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete all, unless there some attribution issue. Note that RuneScape#Combat doesn't exist anymore, so RuneScape combat is not a good R to section, as I initially guessed. Nyttend (talk) 06:43, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

  @Nyttend: That's because combat is now discussed at RuneScape § Gameplay:

  Combat involves attacking enemies, using abilities, and managing health and resources during encounters. Combat styles include Melee, Magic, Ranged and Necromancy. Melee, Magic and Ranged form a combat triangle in which each style has advantages and disadvantages against the others, while Necromancy, added in 2023, functions as a separate combat style.[23][24][25] In 2012, Jagex released the Evolution of Combat update, which introduced ability-based combat and rebalanced the combat system. Legacy Mode, allowing players to use an older-style interface and combat system, was added in 2014.[26][27] A 2026 combat modernisation update revised Melee, Magic and Ranged abilities and progression, including higher combat skill caps.[28][29]

  Player-versus-player combat has changed substantially over the game's history. The Wilderness historically served as the main open PvP area, but was restricted in 2007 as part of Jagex's efforts to combat real-world trading, restored in 2011 after a player referendum, and later reworked in 2022 into a primarily player-versus-monster area with optional PvP.[30][31][32]

  This is plenty of substance to warrant a redirect. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 15:06, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep RuneScape combat per Scryme. Delete the rest, using the same technique as I suggested abvoe to deal with any attribution problems. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:43, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

  Deleting and recreating RuneScape combat as suggested would cut loose the old revisions related to RuneScape armour, so I'm happy to delete the latter if the former is done first. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 20:01, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep all three combat redirects due to combat being discussed. Weak keep RuneScape Player Killing and RuneScape pking because the article discusses player-versus-player combat. Delete the rest as unmentioned, including RuneScape armour because there is no content left extant from a merge. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: relisting to close an old (and big!) log date
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:52, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

RuneScape gods

• RuneScape gods → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Armadyl → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Guthix → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Saradomin → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Zamorak → Old School RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Draft:Zamorak → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Elvarg → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• King Black Dragon → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Lady Keli → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• TzHaar → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Tzhaar → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Tztok-jad → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescape gods → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescape monsters → RuneScape#Non-player interaction  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Nominating redirects to do with RunesScape gods for deletion as discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 6#RuneScape skills suggested this is okay. I have also included non-god NPCs in this. One page is in Draft namespace for unknown reasons (was created as a redirect in 2022 after being speedy-deleted in 2021, hasn't been touched since). Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 10:11, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: One thing led to another and we ended up discussing King Black Dragon at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 12#RuneScape locations. TL;DR: After Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Black Dragon, it got merged into RuneScape (Special:Diff/30426061). It was then redirected to RuneScape monsters. Following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RuneScape monsters, King Black Dragon was deleted, losing our WP:ATTREQ (as the current version of the page doesn't have the 2005 edit history). Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 14:24, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  Should probably withdraw King Black Dragon as it's a more complicated situation than the rest of these. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 19:48, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  @Here for the one billionth edit: Could you withdraw or at least un-bundle King Black Dragon? This would make this listing a straightforward 'delete all' now that the issue with Guthix was resolved. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 23:13, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

  I'd rather let this run its course for discussion and so whoever closes this can decide what to do (overruling any consensus here if appropriate). It doesn't block coming to a decision on the others.

  Without the merged history, personally I don't see why keep it. There is nothing of value here, just vandalism then later a brief well-intentioned edit pointing to Wikia. I don't know if the 2005 version can be undeleted, the offending RuneScape revisions deleted, or, my favourite option, simply let sleeping dogs lie (in the 20 years the author of those paragraphs has been unknown, this hasn't been an issue). Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 06:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

  @Pppery: As an admin, your input would be helpful here. The current version of King Black Dragon has no problematic history. However, it was previously an article. That article was merged into RuneScape (7 December 2005), but the redirect was retargeted to RuneScape monsters. When RuneScape monsters was deleted, the version of King Black Dragon that had the history of the article was deleted because its target was deleted (WP:CSD#R1) presumably because no-one had tagged it has having history relevant to RuneScape.

  Strictly speaking, the predeletion history is necessary to provide attribution for previous revisions of RuneScape, but I have no idea whether recovering those revisions is even possible after all this time. I had thought maybe revision deletion could fix the problem, but the relevant content was at RuneScape until 9 March 2006 when it was split out into the now deleted RuneScape monsters; a lot of unrelated revisions would need to be deleted. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 20:46, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

  The only advice I have to give is that admins are still capable of restoring the revisions of King Black Dragon that were deleted in 2006 (the sentinel date before which deleted revisions can't be recovered is June 2004). Admins don't have any tools for dealing with this that you haven't brought up already -- rebasing edits is technically possible but not something that I would support doing here even if the community were willing to do it. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:22, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete all Essentially pure fancruft. Unless there is a reason to think that content from that former article remains on the page, which I think is unlikely, I think the fact that it was deleted is a non-issue. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:12, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  Attribution is required for every revision, not just the current one. As long as old revisions remain accessible, it's necessary to preserve the history of who authored them for copyright purposes. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 19:51, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  @Scyrme: Hi, I've just come back from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 13#c-Rusalkii-20260914020000-Here_for_the_one_billionth_edit-20260913232100. Is that not a good point, that we can just cite the author(s) in a dummy edit? Perhaps not for King Black Dragon if we don't have the original edit history, but for Falador if it were to be re-nominated (I don't think I will, but just for example) or any others this concern applies to? Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 03:19, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

  As Rusalkii said, that's only possible "as long as there aren't too many of them". Additionally, Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia states that "Using this method, the edit history of the source page will be unnecessary after four years under the GFDL, though sooner deletion is possible under a CC-BY-SA 4.0 only license." suggesting there are probably license issues with deleting the redirect immediately even if you went to the trouble of doing this. As I understand it, the 4.0 license was adopted in 2023 and does not apply retroactively. (Maybe there's a way around it, idk.)

  I don't see a good reason to push for getting every single redirect nominated on this page deleted, even if it is possible in principle. Keeping a few for history-related reasons is harmless. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 10:10, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

If there are too many of them the history can be preserved in other ways, like moving the page to a subpage of the target's talk page or moving to a more plausible redirect title without leaving a redirect. We are never obligated to maintain bad redirects, though they may not be worth the hassle of saving the history. Rusalkii (talk) 19:57, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Moving redirects to a new title without leaving a new redirect is normally done when the new title at least bears some resemblance to the old one. Moving redirects to radically different titles from the original just creates a confusing situation where article history is hidden under an entirely unrelated title.

Moving the target to a Talk subpage is rarely done and WP:MAD calls it "questionable" as a method for preserving attribution.

I just don't see a need here. All these more obscure methods create more hassle than simply not deleting, which is how situations like these are usually handled. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 22:38, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

(All this isn't even that relevant to this RuneScape gods nomination. This more about the other listings. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 23:10, 14 September 2026 (UTC))

• Delete all* (except King Black Dragon due to an unusual WP:ATTREQ issue). Some of these previously had articles, but they were mostly blanked and redirected so there's no history to worry about for most of these.
  Guthix was merged according to the edit summary of this revision (10 March 2005); the content was merged to RuneScape skills (10 March 2005). Guthix should only be deleted if the RfD concerning RuneScape skills is closed as delete. If it's not deleted, Guthix should be kept and the merge documented on Talk:Guthix.
  Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zamorak states that an article existed at the title, but was plagairised and deleted for copyright reasons. If a redirect was left, per the AfD outcome, it seems it was deleted in 2011. It's unclear why KelseW decided to create new redirects at Zamorak and Draft:Zamorak in 2025. Regardless, it seems there's no content history to worry about. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 20:44, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  Minor note, Zamorak was retargeted to Old School RuneScape after originally redirecting to RuneScape. The reason was "mentioned here", but this is no longer true. There is no mention at Old School RuneScape. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 20:50, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  The only one of these topics currently mentioned seems to be Runescape monsters, but they are only mentioned with no coverage. The mere mentions would not satisfy a reader looking for info about monsters in RuneScape, so the redirect isn't actually helpful. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 20:54, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  Update: Guthix can be deleted now that RuneScape skills has. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 10:20, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete all, including King Black Dragon, due to a lack of mention on Wikipedia. Attribution is not required as there is no extant content left from the merge. We are not required to provide attribution for old revisions and there is a disclaimer explaining that at the bottom of the page when viewing old revisions. I recognize that my view on the subject is not universal, so I recommend adding the list of contributors to the talk page (eg: like I have done here). -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:24, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

  The only thing in the disclaimer beneath old revisions that seems relevant is material not compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which I don't remotely see as a statement saying it's fine to ignore attribution for previous revisions. That message is there because most revisions of most articles were written before Wikipedia even adopted the current 4.0 license. The 4.0 license was only adopted in 2023. If anything, that message stresses the need for maintaining attribution for previous revisions because past contributors did not necessarily agree to co-license their contributions under the new license.

  This is even before considering that any content from past revisions can at any time be restored, copied, or forked elsewhere (and may already have been). If attribution for previous revisions doesn't matter, you're essentially saying it's now public domain, since the license the contributors agreed to no longer applies. And what if it is restored, even if only to be sent to AfD? Does the content revert to the previous license too? That's not how the public domain works. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 16:28, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

  It's clearly stating that old revisions contain material not compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which absolves the requirement under the license for attribution therein. I also agree that it is not a statement saying that it's fine to ignore attribution, but my position is that we needn't bend over backwards to adhere to a standard above and beyond what is required. I disagree with your slippery slope argument. Any deleted material can be restored at any time as they can be found, for example, in mirrors and archives. If material is restored from one of these sources, it would be a violation unless proper attribution can be provided at that time. If attribution is always required for all revisions, any deletion cannot be permitted. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:52, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

  I really don't see where you're getting that it "absolves" anything. Just because it's not under the requirement of the 4.0 license to provide attribution doesn't mean it isn't under the same requirement from a different license (eg. the pre-2023 3.0 license past contributors were required to agree to). As for restoring content from a mirror without attribution, yes, that is a violation. I don't know how you get from there to any deletion being impermissible. On the contrary, it means that content resurrected from a mirror/archive without attribution should just be deleted again, as we would delete any other improperly licensed or copyvio content, if restoring the attribution isn't feasible.

  We're veering off-course here. Bringing it back to relevance, the situation where content was restored from a mirror/archive is comparable to the one with King Black Dragon and RuneScape, except the content was "restored" into old revisions of RuneScape from a now deleted version of King Black Dragon not a mirror/archive. I assume your position is nothing needs to be done here. My position is either the affected revisions of RuneScape need to be deleted or the attribution needs to be restored to remove the need to delete them. You a suggested list of contributors on Talk page. I'd be fine with that outcome instead of restoring some ancient version of King Black Dragon. Either way an admin would have to access the old history, even if it's just to make a list.

  If deleting the current redirect at King Black Dragon does not in any way impede getting the list of contributors for RuneScape's Talk page, I am happy to delete all. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 17:52, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

  Rather than pasting to Talk:RuneScape, I recommend a dummy edit – if the authors fit in an edit summary – or either of the WP:Merge and delete#Talk subpage (essay) methods. The WP:Merge and delete#Comparison table includes examples. I see that these approaches have been discussed above. Flatscan (talk) 04:31, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: relisting to close an old (and big!) log date
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:51, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Total Miner

• Total Miner → Minecraft#Clones  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Total miner → Minecraft#Clones  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Total Miner: Forge → Minecraft#Clones  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No longer mentioned at target. I propose deletion of these pages, as well as removal of Total Miner from lists and unlinking in prose (see links - there's 5 such pages). No history to preserve for attribution. Note that, while the history is gone as of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Total Miner, the Talk page contents were not erased. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 15:53, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia:ANSWER

• Wikipedia:ANSWER → Wikipedia:Reference desk  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

For a quick history lesson: In 2004 this was created as a target to Wikipedia:U.S. Northern wikipedians' notice board, out of all things, and retargeted to where it stands today in 2010.

Either way, this is horribly ambiguous. Wikipedia is full of things that need answering. For example, questions at the help desk, teahouse, reference desk, hell, each and every single village pump. I personally thought of this redirect when looking at WP:42. I'm leaning towards delete because of just how hopeless this is and its low number of links, but my second choice would be retargeting to Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything just to give some sort of compromise. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 13:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Redirect per nom. | One Reaction was here. Got a complaint? 14:38, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Redirect per nom. – SJ + 17:12, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

And what about a DAB page? We have those for WP pages as well. Cambalachero (talk) 18:25, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

I'm aware of those, but like I said, this is hopelessly ambiguous. A dab page would have too many items to work in my opinion. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 02:02, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Redirect per nom. Szxq (talk) 17:31, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Waseb

• Waseb → Waseberg  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I cannot find anything that calls this "Waseb" in really any sources. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 13:51, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete: me neither. Szxq (talk) 17:32, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Emcore

• Emcore → Solar cell  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

From what I can tell Emcore used to manufacture solar cells, but they haven't done so since 2014. Furthermore, there's no mention of "Emcore" in the target article. ExitTheWarrior (talk) 12:57, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Szxq (talk) 17:32, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Rain, Rain, Rain (Frankie Laine and The Four Lads song)

• Rain, Rain, Rain (Frankie Laine and The Four Lads song) → Frankie Laine  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The subject is mentioned on both the target article and The Four Lads. Both articles seemed to go into the same amount of detail regarding the subject; only mentioned in one sentence in passing, including the fact that the musician and the music group collaborated on the subject. However, with that being said, it's not clear if a reader is attempting to locate the current target article or The Four Lads if they search up the search term, meaning this redirect is ambiguous due to multiple potential targets. Steel1943 (talk) 12:02, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

New Man (Taylor Swift and BloodPop song)

• New Man (Taylor Swift and BloodPop song) → List of songs by Taylor Swift  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• New Man (Taylor Swift and Bloodpop song) → List of songs by Taylor Swift  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• New Man (BloodPop and Taylor Swift song) → List of songs by Taylor Swift  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• New Man (Bloodpop and Taylor Swift song) → List of songs by Taylor Swift  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• New Man (Taylor Swift song) → List of songs by Taylor Swift  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article, leaving it unclear what readers may be attempting to find when searching these terms. However, there is mention of a song named "Newman" (no space) in the article BloodPop, but no reference about the song having any collaboration with Taylor Swift. (There's no mention in Taylor Swift either.) Steel1943 (talk) 07:41, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: I'm not seeing any sources about this potential song collaboration, which makes me believe that these are misleading and implausible redirects. LazyLune (talk • edits) 07:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete – looks like hoaxing to me, but the creator of the redirects is an editor in good standing. Confusing. Regardless, not a real song. aesurias (she/her) (talk) 12:24, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

WP:ABUSE

• Wikipedia:ABUSE → Wikipedia:Disruptive editing  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Wikipedia:Abuse → Wikipedia:Disruptive editing  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

These were recently retargeted from Wikipedia:Abuse response to Wikipedia:Disruptive editing, but I'm not sure that's the right call. These redirects had a stable target for several years before the retarget. These searches may be useful: and . The majority of the links refer to the previous target, despite that page being closed down. There are some exceptions though. Note that there exists Wikipedia:ABUSE (disambiguation), which doesn't even list Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. Mathguy2718 (talk) 05:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Move the DAB page to the base name, I wouldn't suggest disruptive editing is necessarily abuse and the edit filter would probably be more likely and the current target hasn't been used since 2013 so might well not be what most editors are looking for today. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:49, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
• Move DAB per above Szxq (talk) 04:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Solita (Ozuna, Mambo Kingz and DJ Luian song)

• Solita (Ozuna, Mambo Kingz and DJ Luian song) → Ozuna  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Solita (Ozuna song) → Ozuna  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article. Also not mentioned in DJ Luian, and Mambo Kingz doesn't exist. Without mention or context, plus the fact that 3 different artists are mentioned in the disambiguator, readers will not find what they are looking for really no matter what. Steel1943 (talk) 05:13, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Procedural closure

• Wikipedia:Procedural closure → Wikipedia:Deletion process#Procedural closure  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Should be re-dabified. It may also mean Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions#Early closure. George Ho (talk) 04:57, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Strong keep - It has been a redirect to the content at WP:PCLOSE since 2011 (it is the full 'proper' title of that section, at least in spirit as it is not in practice right now). Clear primary topic in the projectspace sense. That aside, projectspace shortcuts may be and are almost are almost always ambiguous. Information about procedural closes at requested moves can be added as a hatnote or in some other fashion if deemed necessary. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 05:13, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
• Could also mean WP:Deletion review#Early closes. But it doesn't. Deletion process is so very far and away the primary meaning here that even the current hatnotes a bit lower at #Early closure look excessive and unnecessary. —Cryptic 06:37, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
• Support – If anything, the dab would be a good index for people looking to close any formal discussion early. FaviFake (talk) 08:11, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
• Strong keep per Godsy. We should always be very conservative about retargetting shortcuts because most people do not regularly check the target and assume it leads to where it did when they first learned of it. This means that if it's reretargetted different people will link to it expecting different meanings, which can cause misunderstandings. Disambiguating shortcuts helps nobody and makes the shortcut essentially useless - most shortcuts are ambiguous, it's not a problem that needs fixing let alone one that justifies creating problems where none currently exist. Thryduulf (talk) 09:05, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Air travel disruption after the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption

• Air travel disruption after the 2010 Eyjafjallaj√∂kull eruption → Air travel disruption after the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete this mojibake redirect from 2010. This is the only redirect replacing "ö" with "√∂" when there are thousands of articles with "ö" in their titles or as redirects. The edit summary also somewhat doesn't make sense. This also gets minimal pageviews in the past few years, showing the lack of usefulness. Mathguy2718 (talk) 04:32, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Would be eligible for R3 were it not 16 years old. Tevildo (talk) 19:26, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Implausible with no convicing evidence of use. The total traffic since 2015 is indistinguishable from typical background traffic all redirects eventually collect just by existing. There was an invisible comment that states Cut and paste of the link gave me this. I'm not sure why their device was struggling to copy/paste Eyjafjallajökull at the time, but it seems unlikely to still be a problem over a decade later. (I'm not sure it's all that likely even on old devices.) – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 22:13, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Fox Florida

• Fox Florida → WFTX-TV  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Nothing links here; searching for the term brings up the redirect article as the first result anyway Safety Cap   📢 04:07, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep - "Nothing links here" is not a reason to delete a redirect; see WP:RPURPOSE, WP:R#KEEP, and WP:CHEAP. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 05:52, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep Redirects are indeed cheap, and now that this is the station brand, WFTX has the strongest claim to the title. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 17:59, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Israel's genocide of the Palestinians in Gaza

• Israel's genocide of the Palestinians in Gaza → Gaza genocide  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unnecessary, non-neutral POV-pushing redirect that violates Wikipedia's core WP:NPOV guidelines and WP:NEUTRALTITLE policy. Does not serve as a standard, objective search alternative to the primary article. —Biosketch (talk) 04:06, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

This redirect may be unnecessary but how is it POV-pushing? IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 04:36, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

@Biosketch, could you please give an explanation here? IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 22:08, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Redirects don't have to be neutral per WP:RNEUTRAL and I don't think the name is non neutral because it describes what the linked article states in the first sentence. Laura240406 (talk) 08:25, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

DeleteAgree it is unnecessary. As far as I can see the only basis for it is that it is the title of a UN infographic. I can't see it being a topic name or useful search term. NadVolum (talk) 14:00, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete Nobody will type that wall of text to search for the article. Cambalachero (talk) 14:16, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep as {{r from long name}}. This is not POV-pushing or non-neutral, but even if it were, per WP:RNEUTRAL, non-neutral redirects are permissible and the nominator is mistaken about the guidelines regarding redirects and neutrality.

There's nothing wrong with this redirect beyond not being concise. It's harmless. Most redirects are "unnecessary" given Wikipedia has a search engine. Redirects are cheap and created for various reasons besides being strictly "necessary" for navigation. None of the WP:R#DELETE criteria apply here. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 21:05, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

It may also be worth mentioning that because the search bar includes suggestions, a reader wouldn't have to type out the whole title for this redirect to be helpful to them. It already appears as a suggestion by the time I type Israel's g. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 21:19, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Weak delete. Occurrences of this exact phrase infrequently appear in online publications (~5 pages of Google results, excluding Wikipedia). Usage without the "the" is more common (25 pages) and I remain sceptical of the benefits of this redirect. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 22:48, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. Achmad Rachmani (talk) 03:42, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

  @Achmad Rachmani: Why "per nomination"? Have you read WP:RNEUTRAL? Or did you just skip to "per nom"? – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 06:14, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

  Scyrme Because the redirect is neutral. I just skipped to "per nom". Achmad Rachmani (talk) 07:20, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

  I assume you meant "not neutral"? WP:RNEUTRAL explicitly says "perceived lack of neutrality in redirect names is not a sufficient reason for their deletion". "Per nom" isn't enough here; please engage with the rest of the discussion. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 07:28, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

• Strong Keep. As this simply states very strongly academically supported self-evident information that is stated at the top of the page itself. David A (talk) 10:23, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep as the redirect's title is included in the first paragraph of the target. Szxq (talk) 17:36, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep I could most certainly imagine this string being imputted by someone who wasn't clear if "Gaza genocide" would bring them to something like Allegations of genocide in the October 7 attacks. In solidarity, 💫ΩmegaMantis💫^(he/him) ❦blather | ☞spy on me 00:57, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Kingdom Family Church

• Kingdom Family Church → Joshua Media Ministries  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Nothing links here, searching for the term brings up the redirect article as the first result. Safety Cap   📢 04:06, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep - "Nothing links here" is not a reason to delete a redirect; see WP:RPURPOSE, WP:R#KEEP, and WP:CHEAP. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 05:52, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. Alternative name for the organization, mentioned in the article. Tevildo (talk) 19:28, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

26 September newspaper

• 26 September newspaper → 26 September (newspaper)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Nothing links to this. Searching for 26 September brings up the entry of the actual article very high in the results; the term is generic enough that there aren't very many articles with this term. Safety Cap   📢 04:03, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep - "Nothing links to this" is not a reason to delete a redirect; see WP:RPURPOSE, WP:R#KEEP, and WP:CHEAP. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 05:52, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. The stats page isn't working at the moment, so I can't factor that in, but omitting the brackets seems likely in a search query. The auto completions may not appear for all users (e.g. poor internet connection, or JavaScript disabled). Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 16:06, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

  It's working now. 4 hits, if we exclude the couple immediately following its creation. Background noise. Not a great argument in a vacuum, just wanted to follow up on this. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 22:51, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Halloween Jack

• Halloween Jack → Loki (Marvel Comics)#Marvel 2099  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 December 28 § Halloween Jack .E2.86.92 David Bowie – Delete and move over Halloween Jack (comics)

No mention at the target. This page was originally created in 2006 as a David Bowie persona, but was PRODed, converted to a redirect to the singer, and then deleted at RfD. At the time, the Marvel character which was an article, was seen as a better topic for this title. Now however, Halloween Jack (comics) has been reduced to a redirect to an unsourced one-line mention at its target.

Is David Bowie / Diamond Dogs the primary target, or should this be a disambig? Jay 02:57, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguate. Not sure if there's a primary topic. but there are more than 2 plausible targets so a disambiguation page is warranted anyway.

My external search results are mixed for the Bowie character and various horror films particularly The Curse of Halloween Jack and The Legend Of Halloween Jack. The films don't have their own articles, but are listed at the article of their director, Andrew Jones (filmmaker). Besides the Bowie persona, Marvel character, and films, there's also Jack O'The Lantern, the folklore character responsible for the association of the name "Jack" with Halloween in the first place.

Jack Skellington should be listed as a "see also", as it seems plausible someone who doesn't remember the character's surname but does remember that he's a resident of Halloween Town would search for him using "Halloween Jack". – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 20:52, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

I've drafted a disambiguation page under the redirect at Halloween Jack. Please amend it if needed. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 21:56, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

55th Airborne Division

• 55th Airborne Division → 55th Airborne Brigade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 55th Parachute Division → 55th Airborne Brigade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of division at target. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:41, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

September 28

In department of revenue

• In department of revenue → Taxation in Indiana  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The term isn't mentioned in the target. The term exists online but it doesn't seem to be solely used by Indiana. Suonii180 (talk) 09:05, 20 September 2026 (UTC) Suonii180 (talk) 09:05, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• I assume it's supposed to be the lowercase of IN (postal code of Indiana) Department of Revenue, like Tx Dept of Criminal Justice or Va Dept of Health. Is the specific phrase actually ambiguous? My searches are only turning up Indiana results, but that may just be because I'm browsing from the U.S. I'm not sure someone searching for, say, Department of Revenue (India) is as likely to use the two-letter abbreviation. If kept, note that Indiana Department of Revenue is instead a redirect to Indiana#Taxation, so we would need to figure out what the best target. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:53, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• My Google results are for both the Indiana and India departments, searching from Australia. Specifically the second result is for dor.gov.in. Fork99 (talk) 20:07, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 23:02, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete. This term seems too generic to relate to one article specifically. This title seems appropriate for a disambiguation page. Qwerty123M (talk) 03:00, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Legal status of pet skunks in Virginia

• Legal status of pet skunks in Virginia → Skunk#Relations with humans  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Legality of pet skunks in Virginia → Skunk#Relations with humans  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 27 § Legality of pet skunks in Virginia – retarget to Skunks as pets

Not mentioned in target. Delete. Thepharoah17 (talk) 22:14, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. Plausible search term. See point three of WP:R#KEEP. Qwerty123M (talk) 03:04, 29 September 2026 (UTC) Delete. This is a confusing redirect, the information that the title implies is not there at all. Qwerty123M (talk) 03:06, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment This information was formerly at Skunks as pets, but was not preserved when that article was merged with Skunk. Perhaps it might be re-introduced? Tevildo (talk) 19:30, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

French bakery

• French bakery → Baguette  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Suggest delete since this seems like an astonishing target Thepharoah17 (talk) 22:09, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Weak retarget to Pâtisserie, since this is essentially a French bakery, but somewhat more specific than the general term, since it's for pastries rather than other baked goods, like bread. Otherwise, a delete as a secondary option wouldn't be unreasonable either. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 22:33, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment Boulangerie (literally, bakery) unfortunately just redirects to bakery, which has very little French-specific content. It seems like French bakery and Boulangerie should target the same place. Though perhaps retargeting this redirect to Pâtisserie is an acceptable improvement. The current target is clearly not great. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:51, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to bakery as an avoided double redirect of boulangerie and in the absence of more specific content. Oppose retargeting to pâtisserie which doesn't sell bread (though most boulangeries in France sell both bread and pastries and are officially classified as boulangerie-patisserie). Rosbif73 (talk) 10:07, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Coinbox

• Coinbox → Payphone  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

not a term primarily associated with payphones, let alone a synonym. despite views being just past the threshold of background noise, there seems to be no good target for this due to how vague the use cases are consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 17:21, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Neck of Charlie Kirk

• Neck of Charlie Kirk → Assassination of Charlie Kirk  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Neck Kirk → Assassination of Charlie Kirk  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Kirk Neck → Assassination of Charlie Kirk  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Kirk neck → Assassination of Charlie Kirk  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• The day Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck → Assassination of Charlie Kirk  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Following Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 20#Shooting of Charlie Kirk in the neck, I find it appropriate to examine the rest of the neck-related redirects. I agree with the consensus there that they are implausible. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:53, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget Kirk neck to Vulcan nerve pinch. No, but seriously, delete all per the previous discussion; I guess I missed these originally. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:07, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete all. None of them is a plausible search term (to put it mildly). --Tryptofish (talk) 22:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Herbarium_Bogoriense

• Herbarium_Bogoriense → Bogor_Botanical_Gardens  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Herbarium Bogoriense (herbarium acronym BO; Bahasa Indonesia page, (archived) BO website) is a herbarium, and is not the same institution or in the same physical space as the Bogor Botanical Gardens. It should have its own English language page. This redirect is proposed for deletion. Taxon (talk) 15:37, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• I agree that the current redirect target is quite incorrect not great, though it seems that the herbarium was once housed in the botanical gardens. I'd propose changing the target to List_of_herbaria#Asia, where it is mentioned. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 16:12, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to List of herbaria#Asia: Redirect per SunloungerFrog makes sense. - In solidarity, UtherSRG (talk) 14:26, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Hand Egg

• Hand Egg → Handeck  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Hand-egg → American football  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 September 7 § Hand Egg – retarget to Handegg

For the same reason as Handegg. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 12:29, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Weak retarget, but where? While Handegg is an accepted alternative spelling of the Swiss village Handeck (see my reply to the nomination below), Hand Egg as two words (or hyphenated Hand-egg, which I've bundled into this discussion) would seem less likely to refer to that locality and more likely to refer to the slang term for a sport that involves handling an egg-shaped ball – though that usage of the term doesn't seem to be mentioned on wiki with the exception of the existing redirects for American handegg, Australian handegg and Canadian Handegg. Perhaps the generic Gridiron football would be a better target? Rosbif73 (talk) 14:03, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

  On further thought, target both to Handeck and add a hatnote linking to wikt:hand-egg – unless a mention of the slang term is added somewhere, in which case target that mention. Rosbif73 (talk) 14:54, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Please merge this and the discussion below. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 16:58, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

The rationale for these is not quite the same as for Handegg (one word), so I think it's preferable to keep the discussions separate. Rosbif73 (talk) 14:54, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Handegg

• Handegg → Handeck  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 2 § Handegg – no consensus
• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 10 § Handegg – keep

Shouldn't it redirect to American football or something similar? Candidyeoman55 (talk) 12:28, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

No one who is typing Handegg is looking for the Swiss town of Handeck. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 12:32, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: Google AI search tells us that Handeck and Handegg are two contemporary, interchangeable spelling variants used to describe the exact same location in the Bernese Oberland region of Switzerland and goes on to explain that both phonetic spellings have coexisted for generations in Germanic alpine naming traditions, where regional dialects allow the interchangeable use of the ending -egg (referring to a ridge or corner of land) and -eck. The use of the term as a slang description for some variety of Gridiron football does not seem to be explained anywhere on wikipedia; if such an explanation is added, we could then add a hatnote to the Swiss village's page. Rosbif73 (talk) 13:47, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. We've been over this ad nauseam. "No one who is typing Handegg is looking for the Swiss town of Handeck." Do you really think anyone is going to be unable to find football without this? And even if they somehow can't, a hatnote gets them there. Unless there's something about the term "handegg" specifically, then favor the thing we actually have content about that's actually named "Handegg". –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:41, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: The number of "non-juvenile" persons (from English-speaking places outside North America) that would seriously seek context/explanation of (and not find) any articles with coverage of the "slang" term's applicability to all the forms of football (that do not use a soccer ball) is likely miniscule. DeXXus (talk) 02:02, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

AMSP

• AMSP → A Moon Shaped Pool  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The acronym is not mentioned at the target, and I don't think it is the primary topic. On enwiki, more mentions are for Arrow McLaren SP, but the acronym is not mentioned either at Arrow McLaren or McLaren, in case we're looking at an alternate target (or disambiguation). There are also programs like Advanced Military Studies Program, Advanced Math Support Program, and Alcohol Medical Scholar Program, but I couldn't find enough links for a disambig. Jay 08:10, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Guttersnipe

• Guttersnipe → Street children  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. Note Guttersnipes (erroneously per WP:MISPLACED) points to Guttersnipes (band) * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 06:30, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: There are a few mentions of this term on Wikipedia: An extended play is mentioned at Beanbag (band), and a song is mentioned at Atlantis (Besieged album) and Bhiman (album). It's possible that a disambiguation could be made, but a retarget or deletion would also work. LazyLune (talk • edits) 03:24, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

SynthID

• SynthID → Gemini (language model)#Nano Banana  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Several other AI companies are now themselves adopting SynthID. Shocksingularity (talk) 06:11, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Shocksingularity, AI watermarking (which didn't exist when I created the redirect) is a better target now. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 08:23, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

CS Peirce's Philosophy of mathematics

• CS Peirce's Philosophy of mathematics → Charles Sanders Peirce#Philosophy of mathematics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirect seems unnecessary, especially when one considers that CS Peirce already redirects to Charles Sanders Peirce, and one looking for his philosophy of mathematics via searching up "CS Peirce's Philosophy of Mathematics" (or similar, which itself seems unlikely) would have seen his Wikipedia article pop up right next to the search box. PicoMath (talk) 01:51, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Umm, Speedy delete, G7? Nominator is also the creator. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:34, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Yarnaby

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy keep

Dr. Fahad Bin Ishaq

• Dr. Fahad Bin Ishaq → District Hospital Pulwama  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Non-notable coordinator or mid-level hospital administrator, not mentioned at target article (and really see no reason he should.) Article recreated after speedy deleted A7/G11, does not meet any GNG for redirect. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 01:36, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Gorkha Dal

• Gorkha Dal → Nepal Rashtrabadi Gorkha Parishad  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not linked by anything. Covered by other redirect(s) Safety Cap   📢 01:13, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep - "Not linked by anything" is not a reason to delete a redirect; see WP:RPURPOSE, WP:R#KEEP, and WP:CHEAP. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 05:54, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Death Penalty for Terrorists Law, 2026

• Death Penalty for Terrorists Law, 2026 → Death Penalty for Terrorists Law  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Nothing links to it, it is a duplicate of the article with very little value-added Safety Cap   📢 01:12, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep — incoming links are not required per point two of WP:R#KEEP. Qwerty123M (talk) 01:23, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep per Qwerty123M. Servite et contribuere (talk) 05:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep - "Nothing links to it" is not a reason to delete a redirect; see WP:RPURPOSE, WP:R#KEEP, and WP:CHEAP. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 05:55, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

MV Isle of Gigha

• MV Isle of Gigha → MV Sound of Gigha  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The Isle of Gigha disambiguation page covers this redirect. Both the place and the ferry used this name. Safety Cap   📢 01:07, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep, valid R from former name. Rosbif73 (talk) 07:24, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retain - The rationale presented by the nominator is potentially an argument to retarget the title (likely to the mentioned dab), but not delete it. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 05:57, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep a valid {{r from former name}}. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:40, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

HPanel

• HPanel → Hostinger#Services  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The "Services" section no longer exists in the destination article and "HPanel" is not mentioned anywhere there either. Safety Cap   📢 00:44, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

United States v. Trump (election obstruction case)

• United States v. Trump (election obstruction case) → Federal prosecution of Donald Trump (election obstruction case)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is a duplicate of the United_States v. Trump redirect to the disambiguation page. A user searching (United States v. Trump) will see multiple entries, instead of the original, cleaner name. Safety Cap   📢 00:37, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep this is clearly not a duplicate as this search term would be quite obviously for this target. Servite et contribuere (talk) 05:57, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

United States v. Trump (classified documents case)

• United States v. Trump (classified documents case) → Federal prosecution of Donald Trump (classified documents case)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is a duplicate of the United_States v. Trumpredirect to the disambiguation page. A user searching (United States v. Trump) will see multiple entries, instead of the original, cleaner name. Safety Cap   📢 00:35, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep this is clearly not a duplicate as this search term would be quite obviously for this target. Servite et contribuere (talk) 05:57, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Christopher Prieto (chef)

• Christopher Prieto (chef) → Christopher Prieto  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Searching for 'Christopher Prieto' comes up with only one entry. If anything, I'd expect the article to be named "Christopher Prieto (Chef)" and the redirect--maybe--go from the plain name to the person.

As it is, I'm not sure I see the problem this redirect is trying to solve. Safety Cap   📢 00:30, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep harmless redirect. And there is a reason the article is not called "Christopher Prieto (Chef)". It is an unnecessary disambiguation. Nothing to disambiguate it from other people named "Christopher Prieto". Servite et contribuere (talk) 05:59, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep - An {{r from currently unnecessary disambiguation}}. Chef is not an arcane disambiguator and is seemingly an apt descriptor of the subject at hand. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 05:59, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
• keep per Godsy --Lenticel ^(talk) 11:01, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

September 27

Countershock

• Countershock → Defibrillation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

per wikt:countershock, it's not a concept exclusive to use of the zappy bricks, though that's probably close enough to the primary topic that a soft redirect to wiktionary only might be the slightly better option here, so consider this a weak nom consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 13:24, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Support. Thank you, that would indeed be an improvement that would optimize in this case. As the creator of the redirect (created in 2016), I fully support consarn's proposed improvement. Namely, please provide one of those soft redirects to Wiktionary for this term, instead of redirecting to defibrillation, which is merely one major category of activity where countershock is relevant. Thank you. Quercus solaris (talk) 14:15, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  Can someone remind me about WP's process on this point? (IANAL, including wikilawyering.) I intend to change the page to use {{Wiktionary redirect}} if there are no objections here within a certain time frame. How many days must pass before a bold move is made? Thx. Quercus solaris (talk) 19:45, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  Never mind — there are no stakes anyway: I will do that, and if anyone imagines that it needs to be undone, then they can click a button to undo it. Quercus solaris (talk) 19:53, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  xfdcloser is a pretty neat tool for this process, which i'll recommend having regardless just because of how versatile it is, though as i mentioned in the summary when undoing the soft redirection, closing this should be left to an uninvolved editor consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 20:04, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Weak keep/weak delete, but do not retarget to wiktionary. The various mentions are all related to the current target, so there's certainly nothing else to reasonably target. The only other search hits are for a handful of sources published by a "Countershock Press". That being said, I wouldn't mind seeing this go altogether, but if it has to stay, it should stay where it is. As almost always, Wikt redirects are actively harmful and should almost never be used. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 23:44, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  admittedly not seeing what would make this one harmful tbh consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 00:17, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Agree with Deacon. Weak delete because we already have redirect Electric countershock. Weak keep because Countershock had ~1000 pageviews (presumably for the topic of the heart) in the last decade, as compared to Electric countershock which had only 250 (of which ~100 were on a single day for some reason in 2022). Jay 17:38, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 21:53, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Square root of 0

• Square root of 0 → 0  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Same reason as to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 31#Square root of 1. Implausible and not useful. AlphaBetaDeltaLambda(αβδλ)^talk 21:46, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Square root, where this is discussed in a couple of places. As far as I can tell, the current target does not discuss this. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:12, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

See square root of 4 and square root of 9. Athina241 (talk) 06:54, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. 1234qwer1234qwer4 20:30, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

- -;

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 14 § - - – target all to List of emoticons#Shame

• - -; → Emoticon  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• - -;; → Emoticon  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete due to not being listed/mentioned at Emoticon or List of emoticons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-50069-98 (talk) 10:17, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given the previous RfD I am reluctant to soft delete.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 21:18, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

-_-;; is mentioned at Emoticon#Korean. 1234qwer1234qwer4 04:29, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

DYT

• DYT → Districts of Bhutan#History  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Appears to be unclear if "DYT" is primarily associated with the districts of Bhutan, the airport code, or another target. Judging by the history there used to be an entire dedicated section to discussing them at the target, which is no longer present. There are a few references to a group called "DYT Productions", as well as a song of that name by the group Itzy. Keep, retarget, or disambiguate? ScalarFactor (talk) 19:55, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• Disambiguate: the Bhutan district councils, the airport code and the Itzy song all seem equally obscure and none of these are likely to be primary. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:43, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

  Note: I've drafted a DAB page. Rosbif73 (talk) 12:30, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

• support drafted dab page --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:04, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Loor

• Loor → Pendragon: Journal of an Adventure Through Time and Space#Loor  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No longer mentioned, making this a broken section link, although there is significant history; note there are some people with this surname. Mathguy2718 (talk) 19:46, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete and move Loor (surname) to its place. --Altenmann >talk 20:05, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete and move Loor (surname) to its place per Altenmann --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:07, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

ExtUSB

• ExtUSB → USB hardware#Proprietary connectors and formats  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Extusb → USB hardware#Proprietary connectors and formats  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A proprietary connector by HTC, mentioned in articles on various HTC products but not at the target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:20, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Jankovič

• Jankovič → Branislav Jankovič  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Surely this barely-notable Czech ice hockey player is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for this surname. I do not believe there is one. This should probably be converted to a disambiguation page. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 17:33, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose I would love to make a surname page (not disambig). Unfortunately he is the only one on wikipedia. You may want to learn a template, All pages with titles containing Jankovič There is a similar surname, Janković , but it is different despite looking similar: the pronunciation and ethnic origin (West Slavic vs. South Slavic) are different. (and of course "Weird Al" Yankovic in Yankovic, not to say about Jankovich, Jankovits, Yankovich...) --Altenmann >talk 19:26, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
• P.S. It appears there are several notable bios in cs-wiki cs:Franc Jankovič, cs:Jozef Jankovič, cs:Milan Jankovič, sk:Peter Jankovič, so that I can make the surname page from it after all. --Altenmann >talk 20:19, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Kyūkｙoku!! Hentai Kamen

• Kyūkｙoku!! Hentai Kamen → Kyūkyoku!! Hentai Kamen  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible redirect containing a fullwidth "ｙｙ". This title lasted for one minute before the fullwidth character was changed by the same user. Now, these titles are blacklisted (see MediaWiki:Titleblacklist-custom-fullwidth). Delete per WP:MIXEDSCRIPT. Mathguy2718 (talk) 15:35, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. ScalarFactor (talk) 20:17, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:35, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Fifty-seventh session of the United Nations General Assembly

• Fifty-seventh session of the United Nations General Assembly → Jan Kavan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Deletion because the redirect makes the article appear in related hyperlinks as if the article exists, which it does not, and deleting the article (resulting in red hyperlinks) will allow others to identify the creation of an article about this topic as a point of growth. Alexandraaaacs1989 (talk) 11:29, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Helpful Cat🐈 12:15, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:36, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Fifty-eighth session of the United Nations General Assembly

• Fifty-eighth session of the United Nations General Assembly → Julian Hunte  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Same as above. Alexandraaaacs1989 (talk) 11:29, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Helpful Cat🐈 12:15, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:46, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Fifty-ninth session of the United Nations General Assembly

• Fifty-ninth session of the United Nations General Assembly → Jean Ping  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Same as above. Alexandraaaacs1989 (talk) 11:29, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Helpful Cat🐈 12:15, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:46, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Thirty-fifth session of the United Nations General Assembly

• Thirty-fifth session of the United Nations General AssemblyThirty-fifth session of the United Nations General Assembly → List of UN General Assembly sessions  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Same as above. Alexandraaaacs1989 (talk) 13:25, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Helpful Cat🐈 13:38, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per WP:REDLINK --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:47, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Twenty-seventh session of the United Nations General Assembly

• Twenty-seventh session of the United Nations General AssemblyTwenty-seventh session of the United Nations General Assembly → List of UN General Assembly sessions  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Same as above. Alexandraaaacs1989 (talk) 13:30, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Helpful Cat🐈 13:38, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per WP:REDLINK --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:47, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

37th Motor Rfle Division

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete

Scientician

• Scientician → Lisa the Vegetarian  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information about this term at the target or anywhere else on enwiki. Delete as unclear and unhelpful. There used to be articles (unrelated to Lisa) at this page title. The first was AfDed and the second PRODed. Even when it was recreated as a redirect, the target had no mention of this term. Jay 07:19, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Wikt:Scientician exists, but I'm not sure if this term meets the criteria for a soft redirect to it. It's been created a few times, but doesn't have any mainspace links. No objection to deletion, though. Chess enjoyer (talk) 09:55, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

4128

• 4128 → Cripps Pink  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is a redirect from a four-digit number to an article about a cultivar of apple with the tag #4128. But this is very vague, as search shows, and it's implausible that someone would search for this and expect the first thing in mind to be a type of apple, so I think this should be deleted to reveal search results. Mathguy2718 (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:42, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:49, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Slabodka, Belarus

• Slabodka, Belarus → Vilijampolė  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. Target is located in Lithuania, not Belarus, and not anywhere near the Belarus–Lithuania border (the target is a neighborhood in Kaunas) that would make this redirect plausible. Mathguy2718 (talk) 05:47, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• retarget to Slabodka. The current target was both correct and incorrect. Slabodka was indeed a name of Vilijampolė when it was part of Poland and Russian Empire and it gave the name of Slabodka yeshiva. The creator likely named the redirect "Slabodka, Belarus" in the places where the word "Slabodka" was used because in the name looks like Belarusian spelling of Slobodka. I fixed all usages of Slabodka, Belarus and now it is not linked. --Altenmann >talk 15:20, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Disinformation in Belarus

• Disinformation in Belarus → Mass media in the Czech Republic#Disinformation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Mass media regulation in Belarus → Mass media in the Czech Republic#Legal framework  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This makes no sense. Belarus and the Czech Republic are not the same country. Mathguy2718 (talk) 05:37, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

@Mathguy2718: That was my mistake; I meant to redirect those pages to this article and this article. Jarble (talk) 05:45, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget the Belarus one to Propaganda in Belarus, as the creator intended. Signahistar (talk) 13:31, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

ProCredit Bank (Hungary)

• ProCredit Bank (Hungary) → ProCredit Bank (Romania)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. Target is not Hungarian. The bank was founded in 2002, several decades after Austria-Hungary collapsed, so this is more confusing than helpful. The reason this redirect exists is that there was vandalism in the target replacing Romania with Hungary, and the reversion of the improper move left behind a redirect. Mathguy2718 (talk) 05:10, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, Hungary is not Romania. In addition, ProCredit lists their international branches here, and they do not appear to operate in Hungary. ~ A412 ^talk! 07:32, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:23, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Name days in Russia

• Name days in Russia → Name days in the Czech Republic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is unhelpful as a redirect. Apparently, this was caused by a strange mix-up of Russia with the Czech Republic (see this diff for clarification). Delete per WP:R#DELETE #5. Mathguy2718 (talk) 04:46, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• retarget to Name day#Russia. From [the revision history I see it was indeed created with title/content mismatch. --Altenmann >talk 15:39, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• retarget per Altenmann --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:23, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget per Altenmann. Currently unproductive. Zalaraz (talk) 02:13, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Film grain modeling

• Film grain modeling → Advanced Video Coding#Software encoder feature comparison  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Film Grain Modeling → Advanced Video Coding  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned anywhere. 1234qwer1234qwer4 04:00, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• It was removed in this edit in 2015. Happy for redirect to be deleted — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:39, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Lake and Palmer Emerson

• Lake and Palmer Emerson → Emerson, Lake & Palmer  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The order of this redirect's title just seems like an unlikely jumbled mesh up of the target article's name. I mean, per the target article, the abbreviation for the target article's subject is "ELP", which sort of cements this confabulation as being unlikely, unnecessary, and confusing. Steel1943 (talk) 03:27, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• Based off the creator's contemporaneous creations, this was created off a list of paper encyclopaedia entries. Although the specific list he was working off appears to have been deleted, I assume this was an {{R from sort name}} creation. Whether an actual sort name used by an encyclopaedia (unlikely IMO) or the creator's erroneously thinking "Emerson, Lake and Palmer" to be a sort name in itself remains unknown. J947 ‡ ^edits 07:13, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete implausible redirect. --Altenmann >talk 15:24, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Ampora

• Ampora → MS Paint Adventures#Homestuck  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Both MS Paint Adventures and Homestuck contain no usages for the term "Ampora". At the same time, Ampora is an ancient Christian see that has no article on Wikipedia. Pages like Heriberto Bodeant, when mentioning Ampora, are redirecting to MS Paint Adventures. ―Eduardogobi (talk) 06:10, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget for now to List of Homestuck characters#Eridan Ampora, where the character is mentioned. If you wish to disambiguate this with the Christian see, go write the article first. Duckmather (talk) 04:31, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget. per above. The link targets should probably be changed to Titular Bishopric of Ampora in the meantime to avoid confusion. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 13:58, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
• Disambiguate I've drafted one. The titular see surely has more long-term significance than the webcomic character, and neither has their own article anyway. --BDD (talk) 15:22, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 ‡ ^edits 01:01, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• dabify per BDD --Lenticel ^(talk) 13:49, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• The disambig draft looks good. Jay 06:21, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 ‡ ^edits 02:31, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Firewireless

• Firewireless → FireWire  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Target mentions no wireless connections. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:39, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• keep' The redirect is a negation of "firewire" and term usage (mostly as a pun on "wireless") may be found in the internets, e.g., "FireWireless moves forward". --Altenmann >talk 15:30, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

FinFireWire

• FinFireWire → FinFisher#FinFireWire  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention at target; mentioned at FireWire and DMA attack, linking to this redirect and without a source. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:16, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

September 26

Discussion date redirects

• Wikipedia:CFD/2020 March 24 → Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 March 24  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Wikipedia:CFD/2020 May 6 → Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 May 6  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Wikipedia:CFD/2020 June 29 → Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 June 29  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Wikipedia:CFD/2020 July 2 → Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 July 2  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Wikipedia:CFD/2020 July 4 → Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 July 4  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Wikipedia:CFD/2020 July 7 → Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 July 7  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Wikipedia:TFD 2019 March 7 → Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 March 7  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Wikipedia:TFD/2019 March 16 → Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 March 16  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Wikipedia:TFD/2020 March 8 → Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 March 8  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Wikipedia:RFD/2018Nov18 → Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 18  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 8 § Wikipedia:RFD/2018 November 18 – keep

A bot automatically creates a new page for CFD, TFD, RFD and the like with every passing day, so there was no need to create these redirects. Additionally, all but one of these was created by someone who would later be ArbComBanned. These redirects never really served any purpose on this site, and thus should be deleted. JHD0919 (talk) 22:43, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete all. I don't think BHG's block has any relevance here, but regardless, it's hard to say how this random handful of years-old XFD log redirects serve any useful purpose. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:33, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. The last one, and I presume most or all of the rest, were used to provide shortened edit summaries in sweeping automated changes. Edit summaries are not fixable nor viewable through WhatLinksHere, so deleting these redirects would break thousands of links, which is generally considered a bad idea. I've linked the previous RfD above; see Wikipedia talk:Redirects for discussion/Archive 13#Shorthand redirects to XfD daily log pages for further context and support for the usage of these redirects. J947 ‡ ^edits 01:44, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
• Followup comment. Reaffirming my delete vote above, even in light of the above explanation. On the technical side, I suspect it's likely fixable with a phab task if someone cares, although I'm not sure the will would exist to actually do it. If not, XFDCloser should provide a link to the current discussion when these are deleted, so anyone who follows the red link in the edit summary will be able to see the original discussion if they really need from the deletion log (which is still on the unlikely side). That being said, this still isn't a valid excuse per WP:FAIT. Many of these were created after the original discussion, even after there was an objection to these. Moreover, there's no particular reason these couldn't have just used the full link in the edit summary; they're well under the limit. That BHG didn't do so isn't a valid reason to double down on a bad decision in the first place. Note also the inconsistent format of these...some have slashes, some don't...dates are formatted differently, etc. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 02:21, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep in order to preserve links in edit summaries. -- Tavix ^(talk) 13:59, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

SDIO 3.0

• SDIO 3.0 → SD card  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• SDIO 1.0 → SD card  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• SDIO 1.1 → SD card  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• SDIO 2.0 → SD card  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• SDIO 1 → SD card  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• SDIO 2 → SD card  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• SDIO 3 → SD card  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• SDIO 4.0 → SD card  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• SDIO 4 → SD card  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

SDIO versions are not discussed at the target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 20:52, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Older Wikipedians cross-namespace redirects

• Older Wikipedians → Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians aged 70 and older  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Senescent Order of Wikipedians → Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians aged 70 and older  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Elder Wikipedians → Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians aged 70 and older  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Senior Wikipedians → Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians aged 70 and older  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Senescent Wikipedians → Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians aged 70 and older  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

WP:XNRs to Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians aged 70 and older. I could understand a keep !vote per XNR in the same way I could understand a delete !vote, of course. ⚙ Crash >> Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 19:47, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Maybe just move all to projectspace? 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:01, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

My mistake: I should have moved all five of these REDIRECTS to Wikipedia namespace 4:

1. Wikipedia:Elder Wikipedians
2. Wikipedia:Older Wikipedians
3. Wikipedia:Senescent Order of Wikipedians
4. Wikipedia:Senescent Wikipedians
5. Wikipedia:Senior Wikipedians

Yours aye,  Buaidh  talk e-mail 10:49, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Symwave

• Symwave → Microchip Technology  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention at target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:06, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Date redirects to Armenian parliament attack

• 10271999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 27101999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 10 27 1999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 10/27/1999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 10-27-1999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 27 10 1999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 27-10-1999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 27/10/1999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• October 27, 1999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• October 27 1999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 27 October 1999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 27 October, 1999 → Armenian parliament shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Implausible, not seeing any indication that date alone is a reasonable way to refer to this event. ScalarFactor (talk) 04:39, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete the “27 October, 1999” one as incorrectly formatted date, weak delete 10271999 and 27101999. Neutral on the rest as I found Public Radio of Armenia article. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:59, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  I think they'd be plausible if they included "attack" or "shooting", but not as raw dates. ScalarFactor (talk) 05:12, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete all: no indication that the date alone is used in English to refer to this event. Note that we do have redirects for these dates with the word "attack(s)" appended, and those should of course be kept. Rosbif73 (talk) 07:05, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep October 27, 1999, October 27 1999, and 27 October 1999. The lead sentence of the article makes it clear that the event is referred to by the date alone in Armenia. Accordingly, keep these dates as viable search terms, since simply October 27 is taken. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 13:14, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep all that are plausibly correct formats. At a glance, I'd say that 27 October, 1999, 10271999, 27101999, and 10 27 1999 can safely be deleted. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:04, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 18:51, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

You can unlock any door, if you only have the key.

• You can unlock any door, if you only have the key. → The Secret of NIMH  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Phrase not used in article. ScalarFactor (talk) 16:01, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

@TheEleventhProvince:, was this the tagline for the trailer/ad? Halbared (talk) 17:18, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, unmentioned, unlikely search term. Even if it were mentioned (whether as a quote or a tagline or whatever it is), it's unlikely to merit a redirect. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 23:35, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

That's what Nicodemus's amulet said in the movie. TheEleventhProvince (talk) 23:38, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Add it to the article. Halbared (talk) 21:11, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For consideration of the proposal to add it to the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 18:50, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Salumi (Restaurant)

• Salumi (Restaurant) → Salumi (Seattle)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:RDAB, the correctly capitalized title exists as Salumi (restaurant). It was only at this title for a few days in 2006. Note that if kept it is possible it will need to point to Salumi (disambiguation) in the future as there is also one in Plymouth, Devon (Commons:Category:Salumi, Plymouth) and Massapequa, New York. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:15, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia:NOTNP

• Wikipedia:NOTNP → Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a newspaper  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A very surprising target, considering WP:NOTNEWS is policy and is literally section-titled "Wikipedia is not a newspaper". This has a fair number of incoming links, but it's impossible to tell technically if they wanted the policy or the essay. (I would posit almost everyone wants the policy though.) ~ A412 ^talk! 17:23, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not § Wikipedia is not a newspaper per nom. Someone could easily type this shortcut looking for the policy but would be astonished by the obscure essay. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk · edits) 17:48, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a newspaper per nom and add hatnotes back and forth. J947 ‡ ^edits 01:47, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
• retarget per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:03, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

SlopTube

• SlopTube → YouTube  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Couldn't find any reliable sources using this term, in contrast to Microslop. No mention anywhere on Wikipedia either. Wiktionary has an entry, wikt:SlopTube, so it could be redirected there. ~ lily ^{my tree} ~ 15:29, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• No mention at target. Perhaps redirect to AI slop; YouTube is mentioned there in this context but not with that phrase.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 15:33, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: Draft:AI-generated content on YouTube exists and would be a plausible target but is still a draft. ~ A412 ^talk! 17:28, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to content mill, as "slop content" is a term made for content made by a content mill, and content mills are primarily on YouTube. The -tube suffix is used for YouTube specific trends (such as BookTube). In solidarity, PokemonPerson (talk) 23:03, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Deltarune quote redirects

• Kris Get The Banana → List of Undertale and Deltarune characters#Queen  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Here I come San Frandisco! → List of Undertale and Deltarune characters#Flowery  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Here I come San Francisco! → List of Undertale and Deltarune characters#Flowery  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Jarona → List of Undertale and Deltarune characters#Flowery  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Giasfclfebrehber → Deltarune#Chapter 2 – A Cyber's World  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• YOUR TAKING TOO LONG → Deltarune  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Redirects unmentioned at target. "Jarona" is mentioned in one sentence at Deltarune, but it also looks too minimal to me. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 05:11, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete giasfclfebrehber as vague (that's the variant from undertale, with the one in deltarune actually being "giasfelfebrehber", but also who cares), and the rest per nom consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 18:16, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
• Here I come San Frandisco! And YOUR TAKING TOO LONG are also kinda vague AquaDLTRN (talk) 21:59, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

  Not particularly; I don't believe they are used in any other context other than Deltarune. The Giasfclfebrehber one is vague because it is also used in Undertale (I would assume). Did you want to !vote on this? 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 04:02, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

  it's part of an impossible ice-e crossword puzzle in deltarune, and ice-e's p"e"zza mascot ice-e's catchphrase in deltarune (allegedly). this doesn't matter at all for this discussion, by the way, as they're both one-off jokes consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 11:30, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Retarget Jarona to Gerona as a homophone and plausible typo, and Here I come San Francisco! to San Francisco in popular culture. Keep the rest as R from quote/meme. In solidarity, PokemonPerson (talk) 15:19, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

I would imagine they have to be mentioned in the articles, no? 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 17:48, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Not necessarily. There's plenty of redirects like this: Category:Redirects to an article without mention. ArcticSeeress (talk) 00:21, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or Retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 07:31, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep almost all as instances of Template:R from quote (and for some of them, they'd count as Category:Redirects to an article without mention). However, it might genuinely make sense to delete "Here I come San Francisco!" in particular. The rest of them all actually exist as quotes, but the one spelled "-cisco" is a mishearing of a quote (in which the correct version is "-disco"). Paintspot Infez (talk) 08:40, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  Comment: This eliminates any ambiguity in retargeting Here I come San Francisco! to San Francisco in popular culture. In solidarity, PokemonPerson (talk) 15:28, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

  I would strongly disagree with that retarget. It is not mentioned in the article and would be confusing to readers. ⚙ Crash >> Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 01:06, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The majority of consensus appears to be leaning to keep; however, it's unclear if Here I come San Francisco! should be retargeted to San Francisco in popular culture or deleted. It's also unclear if Jarona should be retargeted to Gerona.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LazyLune (talk • edits) 11:52, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

2004-II

• 2004-II → Liga DIMAYOR  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

2004-II is too ambiguous. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 11:07, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. The redirect makes no sense at all. Brayan Jaimes (talk) 12:05, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:17, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Brahminism

• Brahminism → Historical Vedic religion#Brahmanism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

It currently redirects to Historical Vedic religion but Brahminism is not Historical Vedic religion.

See:

"Brahmanism refers to the whole way of life associated with the brah- mans (brahmins), a caste in *Hindu India. Spe- cifically, Brahmanism is a development of earlier *Vedism, which was the religion of the *Indo-European *Aryans, who entered India in the second millennium B.C.E. Brahmanism, like Vedism, reveres the ancient rituals and sacred texts or *Shruti-the Vedas and the *Brah- manas, *Upanishads, and *Aranyakas that grew out of them but it also places a great deal of trust in the myths contained in less sacred texts or *Smirti, such as the epics the *Mahabharata and the *Ramayana, the *Puranas, and various books of Hindu law." David Leeming, The Oxford Companion to World Mythology p54

This view is prevalent for centuries as seen here:

"It may be noted, by way of proem, that the theory of the transmigration of souls is not advanced in the Vedas. It is a part of Brahman teaching, but Brahmanism and Vedaism are not the same. The Vedas are claimed as the out- come of direct revelation, while all that part of post-Vedic literature in which Brahmanism is enveloped is held to be purely traditional." Edgar Saltus (1885), The Philosophy of Disenchantment

That said, I support restoring the article. Chronos.Zx (talk) 10:40, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• RfD is not the best place to discuss restoring an article. I would suggest continuing to present your case at Talk:Brahminism#Stand-alone article, Talk:Historical Vedic religion, or a relevant WikiProject. J947 ‡ ^edits 10:49, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
  • It is correct place to discuss that. See earlier examples here: Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020 November 11#Criticism of Hinduism and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 15#Criticism of Swaminarayan sect. Chronos.Zx (talk) 11:38, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
    • Both of those discussions were closed in favour of AfD. RfD discusses merely navigational issues like proposals for whether a redirect should be deleted or retargeted. The lede to WP:RfD makes that clear. J947 ‡ ^edits 11:52, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• The modern usage of the term 'Brahmanism' is covered at Historical Vedic religion#Modern usage, more or less stating the same as Leeming. So, what's the rationale to have a separate article on this? Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 11:51, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Restore article Together with the past version, more content can be added from the sources provided above. The topic is notable on its own. Lorstaking (talk) 03:57, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Restore article per nom. Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 11:33, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

ACES (nutritional supplement)

• ACES (nutritional supplement) → Antioxidant  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There's no mention of "ACES" at the target article so there's no indication if it's a variety or brand name. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:03, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. It is a commercial brand of an off-the-shelf dietary supplement (therefore, WP:PROMO) with no WP:SCIRS source to support any claim of being an "antioxidant" or "nutritional". Zefr (talk) 15:01, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Red Squad (Star Trek)

• Red Squad (Star Trek) → Star Trek#Starfleet Academy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target. I think there's probably a decent target among the scattering of mentions we have onwiki, but I'm not sure which on is most appropriate. Input from someone more familiar with this in the context of the series would be helpful. Rusalkii (talk) 08:44, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

• There's a mention at Redshirt (stock character) that might be appropriate. --BDD (talk) 14:56, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:18, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Valiant (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine), which describes Red Squad as an elite squadron of Starfleet cadets. Signahistar (talk) 11:33, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A new target has been suggested.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 08:38, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Institution_(disambiguation)

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Wrong venue.

G-block

• G-block → Extended periodic table  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• G blockG block → Block (periodic table)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

These two pages are about the same topic but redirect to different targets. Which one should be used? IMO the Block (periodic table) link is better as it has a dedicated section to this block. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 04:58, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Block (periodic table) per nom. Double sharp (talk) 09:55, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget and refine to Block (periodic table)#g-block. The page Extended periodic table has more details, but takes a moment to get to the g-block explanation. I've made the link to Extended periodic table at Block (periodic table)#g-block more prominent to help a more curious reader. ⇌ Synpath 13:33, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Block (periodic table) as per nom. ¹⁴¹Pr -_\contribs/- 19:14, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Irlanda del Norte

• Irlanda del Norte → Northern Ireland  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Per WP:FORRED, Spanish is not a common language in Northern Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep; this exact phrase is used in references in 40 articles, suggesting a strong affinity between Spanish and Northern Ireland insofar as Wikipedia is concerned. J947 ‡ ^edits 03:31, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. I reviewed the majority of the results mentioned in the previous comment; all of them seem to be related to topics that are exclusive to Spanish-speaking countries and not exclusive to the target itself, meaning WP:FORRED applies here in reference to using the search term to arrive at the target article on the English Wikipedia. Steel1943 (talk) 03:39, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete As per above and WP:EN. Spanish is not a common language in Northern Ireland. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 05:52, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

  WP:EN does not discuss the merits of redirects. J947 ‡ ^edits 06:05, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep, this is a common sense redirect. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 11:08, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom and Steel1943, plus the redirect being "common sense" is too subjective of an opinion in this case. Mr slav999 (talk) 16:00, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:04, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, no affinity per WP:FORRED. ScalarFactor (talk) 21:53, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:20, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

List of epic films

• List of epic films → Epic film  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• List of epic movies → Epic film  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as there is no list at the target, or anywhere else on enwiki. It was deleted at AfD as Inherently POV: who determines what films are epic?, but was later recreated as a redirect to Category:Epic films. Jay 03:16, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Noting the history around Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of epic films, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of epic films:1930s, and Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 May 16#Category:Epic films, I reckon a list along these lines would be kept today. But I'm not sure deletion is a very effective means of encouraging article creation when it shows the deletion log to a prospective creator. J947 ‡ ^edits 03:26, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete both. No such list exists so there is no sense in redirecting. WP:RETURNTORED almost certainly applies. I agree these list articles likely would have been kept today. I take J947's point that the deletion history may in fact discourage creation but that's not sufficient justification to keep at dead-end redirect. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 16:31, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

They ain't believe in us, God did

• They ain't believe in us, God did → God Did (song)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• They ain't believe in us → God Did (song)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I recently retargeted these redirect from DJ Khaled to their current target as the most applicable target. Apparently, these phrases are lyrics in the target article, but the lyrics are not mentioned in the target article or DJ Khaled, leaving the context of what readers may be attempting to find when searching these redirects unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 03:03, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Aipac Shakur

• Aipac Shakur → Hakeem Jeffries  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• AIPAC Shakur → Hakeem Jeffries  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Satirical, critical, mocking nickname not mentioned in his article, or anywhere else on enwiki. Delete as not providing any context. Jay 02:07, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Speedy delete per G10. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 12:01, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom, speedily if eligible. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 18:30, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to Taylor Made Freestyle: This song gained infamy due to using an AI-generated vocal of 2PAC, which was made more notorious by Kendrick Lamar referencing the AI-generated 2PAC vocals in They Not Like Us. In solidarity, PokemonPerson (talk) 23:00, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete, do not retarget. I find no evidence from searching that Aipac Shakur is used in relation to Taylor Made Freestyle or the Drake-Kendrick feud, and the name exclusively appears to relate to the political controversy instead. ~ A412 ^talk! 07:04, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:26, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Adam Yafai

• Adam Yafai → Yafai  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I removed a reference to Adam Yafai at the target page he and his company don't have pages yet (and both appear to be of questionable notability). At this time there is no good target for this redirect Giulio 01:33, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Not mentioned on enwiki, although Redrice Ventures is. J947 ‡ ^edits 03:09, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as we have no info on him in en.wiki, though it can of course be re-created if Draft:Amulet Private Office moves to mainspace. PamD 07:23, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:47, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Taylor Archibald

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete (G4)

Jungle Queen (2001 film)

• Jungle Queen (2001 film) → Jungle Queen (2000 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, appears to have been created by mistake. Gjs238 (talk) 00:50, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete ... I agree, I may have created it by mistake back then. I don't remember now. Obviously a duplicate Wikipedia title which is not needed....Ngrewal1 (talk) 01:29, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per K4. This redirect was not created by mistake: its title was the article's title from August 2014 to February 2018. Outdated links may still link here. Pageviews strongly suggest as much: this redirect has received over a third as many pageviews since 2024 as the article which it targets (stats). Based off Jungle Queen, ambiguity appears unlikely. J947 ‡ ^edits 03:16, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment The incoming links are easy to check. There's nothing in mainspace. A few user pages for some reason, and some stuff in WP space which all looks like maintenance. As for links from outside WP, I don't think we can be responsible for keeping those working; that's on the maintainers of those pages. --Trovatore (talk) 22:16, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. I could see an argument for keeping this redirect if the year was prior to the actual release year, since that would hint the originally announced year was missed, but a postdated redirect just seems unhelpful and inaccurate. Steel1943 (talk) 03:37, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:41, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Italian aircraft carrier Cavour (C 550))

• Italian aircraft carrier Cavour (C 550)) → Italian aircraft carrier Cavour  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:RDAB, extraneous closing parentheses. Italian aircraft carrier Cavour (C 550) already exists. ScalarFactor (talk) 00:38, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. ~ A412 ^talk! 17:27, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete although it has existed since 2022 it has always been a redirect. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:09, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:09, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

September 25

Phoenix Saga (X-Men: Animated Series))

• Phoenix Saga (X-Men: Animated Series)) → List of X-Men: The Animated Series episodes#ep29  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:RDAB, extra trailing parentheses. Phoenix Saga (X-Men: Animated Series) exists with the same target. ScalarFactor (talk) 21:41, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:05, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:RDAB. Steel1943 (talk) 03:43, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Crenshaw Blvd

• Crenshaw Blvd → Crenshaw (mixtape)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

It seems like this could also be a good search term for Crenshaw Boulevard. JTtheOG (talk) 21:33, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Crenshaw Boulevard as WP:PTOPIC. "Blvd" is a standard abbreviation for boulevard and found on maps and signs, and the song seems fairly clearly named after the road. ~ A412 ^talk! 18:48, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Crenshaw Boulevard per A412. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 19:17, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Kishangarh Metro Station metro station

• Kishangarh Metro Station metro station → Golden Line (Delhi Metro)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redundant "Metro Station"; Kishangarh metro station already exists. ~ lily ^{my tree} ~ 21:30, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Full-length

• Full-length → Statue  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

vague as fr*ck consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 18:22, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• What should it target instead then, or are you proposing deletion? Arlo James Barnes (pro-∪nion) 18:37, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  i wanted to say a dab would also be plausible, but after exactly 12 more seconds of analysis, am torn between deleting and soft redirecting to wikt:full-length consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 18:55, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, vague, could probably refer to a lot of other things, and certainly no reason to single out a statue among them. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:50, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to wikt:full-length where it's defined. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:57, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:02, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Portrait painting#Technique and practice, where the artistic meaning is best covered, with hatnote to Glossary of cricket terms#F (or Line and length. Those are the main ideas for which "full-length" is a term in itself, rather than an adjective of a noun (e.g. Feature film, Evening glove, Curtain raiser, Hammerhead ribozyme#Full-length ribozyme, or Cheval mirror). Search results are decent, but limited by that problem. Despite the Wiktionary entry, most mentions on enwiki refer to albums or films. J947 ‡ ^edits 01:50, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. The phrase is also commonly used when referring to films, which is not mentioned in the Wiktionary page, meaning deletion is probably the best option here since there are numerous meanings and partial title matches. Steel1943 (talk) 03:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Based on this search, I'm seeing many albums and some songs called "full-lengths" (not merely a descriptor like "full-length album") which is not found in the Wiktionary entry (since the noun section only covers portraits), though since this is highly vague, targeting one particular topic isn't helpful for those looking for another. Mathguy2718 (talk) 14:46, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as vague and for all the other reasons given. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 19:37, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Hopelessly vague. This had three incoming links from portait articles, but I've boldly replaced them with the non-vague, already-existing redirect Full-length portrait. The same can be done for the other contexts in which "full-length" might warrant wikifying, piping to Line and length, Full-length film, etc. as needed. Extremely vague links should be discouraged by keeping them red, to encourage being specific. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 20:27, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

  Agreed. Editors have a number of options in this situation including defining the specialized meaning in the text (MOS:NOFORCELINK), linking to a more specific article, or occasionally linking directly to a Wiktionary entry. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 16:10, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Gorillas in our midst

• Gorillas in our midst → Inattentional blindness  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget to Inattentional blindness#Invisible Gorilla Test. "Gorillas in our midst" is the name of the original study, but the redirect only points to the page on inattentional blindness instead of the specific section. ExitTheWarrior (talk) 18:12, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. This is the (partial) title (with incorrect capitalization) of a paper that this article cites, but doesn't mention. Someone searching for this would be redirected somewhere that doesn't mention this, and likely be left confused as to why. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 00:55, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

  Comment: I don’t think this is necessarily an incorrect capitalization. If you look at the original paper (the archived version linked in the article) you can see that the title is stylized as “Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events”.

  Also the article definitely mentions the exact work described in the paper, even if it doesn’t mention it by that name. I’m not sure if this actually affects whether the redirect is valid, but thought it should be pointed out. ExitTheWarrior (talk) 12:18, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

  Hrm, so it is sentence case, weird. And yes, it certainly does...should the article mention the paper by title? I dunno, but it doesn't currently. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:31, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:01, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Worth noting this title is a play on Gorillas in the Mist. J947 ‡ ^edits 03:05, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Search reveals a number of other meanings for the title case Gorillas in our Midst including List of Batman: The Brave and the Bold episodes#ep38 (target or the redirects Gorillas in our Midst!Gorillas in our Midst! and Gorillas in our Midst! (Batman: The Brave and the Bold)Gorillas in our Midst! (Batman: The Brave and the Bold)), a book by Richard Fairgray that is listed in his article and at Storylines Notable Book Awards, an episode of Endgame (TV series) that is mentioned in multiple articles, and an episode of Cataclysmo and the Time Boys. There's also a book called Gorillas in Our Midst: The Story of the Columbus Zoo Gorillas that's used as reference in two articles but doesn't have it's own article and wouldn't be suitable for inclusion on a dab page. The Daniel Simons paper is quite influential and probably could be covered by name in the Inattentional blindness article or in his biography (it is mentioned in the infobox), or both. It is used in as a reference in multiple Wikipedia articles and is listed at Change blindness § Further reading. There's more than enough for a Gorillas in our Midst dab page. What's not immediately clear to me is whether the Simons paper is the primary topic, though I think it has a reasonable claim at that. The sentence case redirect should either be kept or retargeted to a dab page. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 20:17, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

  I've created Draft:Gorillas in our Midst. This can be moved to Gorillas in our Midst or Gorillas in our Midst (disambiguation) depending on the primary topic determination. Gorillas in our Midst (disambiguation) will need to be created as a redirect if this is moved to the base title. The sentence case redirect nominated here should be tagged as {{R from other capitalization}}. If there is no primary topic, Gorillas in our Midst should be created as a redirect with the same target as the sentence case, and the sentence case should be tagged as {{R avoided double redirect}}, and a {{Redirect}} hatnote should be placed at the target pointing to the dab page. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 20:41, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

  I've added explicit mention of the paper at Inattentional blindness § Invisible Gorilla Test. It makes sense to refine (retarget) target Gorillas in our Midst directly to this section, assuming there's no serious primary topic dispute. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 22:04, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

  And it should really be capitalized Gorillas in Our Midst. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 02:15, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• Refine to Inattentional blindness#Invisible Gorilla Test per nom and WP:RSURPRISE. I will move the draft dab page to the correctly capitalized Gorillas in Our Midst (disambiguation) assuming no objection regarding primary topic. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 16:14, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

  No objection from me, the paper seems like it should be the primary topic here. ExitTheWarrior (talk) 20:49, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Redirects to Major and minor

• Majeur → Major and minor  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Mineur → Major and minor  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Menor → Major and minor  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Majore → Major and minor  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

None are mentioned at target, but I believe that these are all Romance language words. I find it plausible there might be affinity with music, especially French and Italian, per WP:FORRED, but these aren't mentioned anywhere and are a hassle for false friends/false cognates, as I've just discovered when searching for Minore (which I'm boldly turning into a disambiguation page instead), while looking for Minore, New South Wales. I find it unlikely an English speaker will misspell "major" or "minor" as any of these. Also, Mineur (surname) should be moved to Mineur and add a mention of Mineur (crater). Fork99 (talk) 09:46, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Let’s hope that this won’t become a WP:TRAINWRECK but here is my vote:
  • Listify Menor - a simple wikipedia search yields various people with the surname “Menor”
  • Move Mineur (surname) to Mineur per nom
  • Delete the rest per nom. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 10:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Listify as appropriate (as creator of at least some). Yes, they are all translations of major or minor in European languages, and as such in classical music often appear in titles, musical instructions, and such. For that reason they are typically included in music encyclopedias (as redirects), and were once on the Wikipedia:Music encyclopedia topics lists (which is why I created them). But certainly no need to prioritize that meaning to surnames or other uses which are likely more common; in fact as a disambiguation page they are better since the explanation could be clearer than a simple redirect. Rigadoun (talk) 17:05, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:58, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Literary studies

• Literary studies → Literary criticism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Poorly targeted redirect. It seems like that literary studies (Literaturwissenschaft) consists of literary theory, literary criticism, and literary history, and should be converted into an article based on Special:PermaLink/803979457.  — 魔琴 (Zauber Violino) [ talk contribs ] 09:18, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep The current target looks like the best we can do. I considered Literary theory and even Philology. I like that the current target has prominent discussion of its relationship with literary theory. An equivalent to Literaturwissenschaft could be good, but in the meantime, I don't think there's anything wrong with the redirect. --BDD (talk) 16:01, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Disambiguate this and Literary science to the three specialities (literary theory, literary criticism, and literary history). pburka (talk) 22:05, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:57, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Tajar, Semnan

• Tajar, Semnan → Tazareh, Semnan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don't see any evidence that there's a place called "Tajar" in Semnan Province, Iran (let alone in the eponymous county or city). There are 4 different places in Iran called "Tazareh", but that's a different term from "Tajar" even when written in Perso-Arabic script. So I suggest deletion. Duckmather (talk) 04:08, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: It is a romanization of the name, as noted in the "Notes" section of the article. By accessing said source and inserting Tajar into the search bar, it brings up a couple of results. LazyLune (talk • edits) 04:35, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete unless anyone can come up with a better source for the claim, which merely lists it under "all names", not as an alternate romanization (which it clearly isn't). The mention at the article should also be removed unless a better source can be found. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 17:23, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:53, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

List of Intel Core processors

• List of Intel Core processors → List of Intel Core desktop processors  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No longer an accurate name for the target after the move, which distinguishes it from List of Intel Core mobile processors and List of Intel Core desktop processors. Should this be DABified as-is at this title, or retargeted somewhere like Intel Core where these lists could be more naturally linked? ScalarFactor (talk) 01:04, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Disambiguate, someone arriving here clearly wants a list. ~ A412 ^talk! 06:27, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Convert to a WP:LISTOFLISTS or retarget to List of Intel processors#See also, which essentially serves the same purpose. - Eureka Lott 19:09, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

  I think List of Intel processors § See also is probably the ideal target, actually. A bit silly to make a dab just for three entries when there's already what amounts to a giant dabpage where we can just point to the relevant three. (Especially if an anchor could be added for {{R from incomplete disambiguation}}.) ScalarFactor (talk) 15:38, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:53, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• @A412: Any thoughts on the alternative retarget as a dabpage? ScalarFactor (talk) 22:34, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

  Fine with the alternative target, all the relevant targets are there. ~ A412 ^talk! 22:53, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Immigant

• Immigant → Much Apu About Nothing  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, unmentioned at target. And before anyone even suggests it, I'd specifically oppose retargeting "Immigrant", as a random, unlikely typo. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 00:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Google Search shows an Immigant Trail Road in Utah. Iggy Swan (Contribs) 20:11, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to immigrant as a plausible typo – as proven by the existence of those hits for "Immigant Trail Road" which unsurprisingly appears to be a typo for Immigrant Trail Road. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:38, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  Any letter deletion is a plausible typo, but there are billions of possibilities of these, and making redirects for stuff like this is silly. Why not mmigrant, immgrant, or immigrnt, etc etc? None of these has any claim to be more likely than any other, and it's not unreasonable to expect a user to correct their error here (when the search engine doesn't already catch it, which it usually does). –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 21:07, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Immigrant per Rosbif73 as a {{R from misspelling}}. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:34, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:52, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom and don't retarget per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:57, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Immigrant is just a redirect to Immigration. Thepharoah17 (talk) 07:19, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

  So what? This, by itself, isn't a reason to delete. There are plenty of {{r from typo}} redirects which are misspellings of terms which are redirects to an article rather than the base title of it. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 18:47, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

It's a short way of saying that it should be a {{R avoided double redirect}} of Immigrant to Immigration. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:22, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Wiggle Puppy

• Wiggle Puppy → This Little Wiggy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention at target, connection unclear. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 00:51, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Not mentioned at target article maybe, but certainly mentioned in target TV episode.

  (Marge and Chief Wiggum watch Ralph run around, barking)
  Marge: Is that normal?
  Chief Wiggum: Yeah, he's just playing "Wiggle Puppy." That's a dog he made up who flies by wagging his tail. I tell ya, that dog has had some amazing adventures.

  —Gimple, Scott M., ed. (1999). The Simpsons Forever! A Complete Guide to our Favorite Family ... Continued. London: HarperCollinsEntertainment. p. 33. ISBN 0-00-653168-7. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:27, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  Wikipedia is not a repository of TV or movie or book quotes. Every episode of every TV show could have hundreds of lines redirected to it, but we don't do that. This one isn't special enough to even mention at the article, so why should it redirect there? –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:55, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per Deacon's immediate above comment. Iggy Swan (Contribs) 20:11, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:52, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, I don't think {{R from quote}} is generally a good idea unless the quote is iconic/important enough to be due weight within the article. ScalarFactor (talk) 22:33, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Untitled Tommy Wirkola film

• Untitled Tommy Wirkola film → Thrash (film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect has no incoming links. The film is now named so is not a likely search term, the redirect serves no purpose. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 16:35, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 18:15, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

• Although there is no consensus as to the pageviews threshold for deletion under WP:UFILM, this had 48 hits in the 90ish days before the RFD nom. Regardless of what I think, that's too high for the RFD community's comfort, especially if there are no other problems with this redirect such as other Tommy Wirkola projects in the works with which this could cause confusion. It would be safer to check again in ≈‍3 months and renominate if views have dropped substantially. But keeping track of these for the sake of repeat nominations isn't the best use of time. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 01:38, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  Or are the pageviews a result of this RFD and from being listed at NPP which is where I came across this redirect. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 21:31, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:UFILM, the film has had a title for more than 30 days. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:36, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:52, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Masoor

• Masoor → Lentil#Types  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Variety name not mentioned in the target. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 14:14, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment. There is wikt:masoor. May or may not be worth a mention in the target. ~2026-48840-63 (talk) 14:32, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 18:15, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep or retarget to Dal. I've added a parenthetical in the part of the article where lentils are discussed in cuisine of the Indian subcontinent. It's not great, but I think that would resolve the issue. For what it's worth, there are several other variants that also redirect there: Masoor dal, Masoor dhal, Masur (lentil), Masur dhal, Masur dal, Masoor daal, Mosur (Dail). -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:18, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:50, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Lean un-refine to Lentil. Masoor is now mentioned in the parenthetical in the lead of Lentil, but not in the target section Lentil#Types. With the limited coverage in the lead of Lentil and the list entry at Dal#Common ingredients, I see no basis to prefer one target over the other. If I understand correctly that masoor is specifically means lentils or red lentils, and excludes other dried legumes that are covered by Dal, then keeping this at Lentil makes sense. If the coverage is expanded, removed, or reorganized then this and the related redirects Tavix identified can be retargeted. Retargeting/refinement to a page or section with expanded content can occur as a matter of editorial discussion and doesn't require repeat WP:RFD nomination unless there is a new dispute. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 19:24, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Template:Germany Squad Template:Brazil Squad 2005 FIFA Confederations Cup

• Template:Germany Squad Template:Brazil Squad 2005 FIFA Confederations Cup → Template:Germany squad 2005 FIFA Confederations Cup  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Template apparently made in error by a now-blocked editor.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  19:45, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment: These two diffs explain what the nominator did not provide sufficient evidence for: . Both of the aforementioned diffs occurred in the same minute. IMO, the fact that the editor who made these edits is currently blocked is somewhat of a red herring since the block occurred 13 years later. Steel1943 (talk) 03:52, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

FIFA's

• FIFA's → FIFA  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 24 § FIFA's – no consensus
• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 14 § 's – no consensus

check the incoming links for "delete's" for previous consensus on possessive form redirects and the previous rfd this was in for info on this nom. i'm making this an order because i'm bad (evil) consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 19:24, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete's I can't see how this could be plural as claimed in the previous RFD. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:59, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per, at this point, fairly well-established consensus to delete possessive redirects of this nature. There prior RFD made no convincing showing that this is a common plural or that any other factors exist that should warrant special treatment for this redirect. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 18:56, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

EU's

• EU's → EU (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 5 § EU's – retarget to EU (disambiguation)
• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 14 § 's – no consensus

"delete's per usual consensus about possessive form redirects; see the incoming links for that red link for more info" is what i would say if i wasn't evil (bad). in that case, i'd then follow it up with "see the previous rfd this was listed in" consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 19:18, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete's I can't see how this could be plural as claimed in the previous RFD. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:59, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

I could see people using EU's for EUs (or eUs), a plural of maybe endotoxin units or entropy units or execution units, but that then brings up the obvious question of why don't we have that redirect.

And it's a bit incoherent with the idea that EU is a primary redirect. If it's really that, then it's probably reasonable to assume that the possessive use of that overshadows this odd pluralization use.

I checked if we have any piped links to this, and we do, but they all seem to refer to the primary meaning of EU. --Joy (talk) 21:40, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

I have corrected these in accordance with MOS:POSLINK. As is often the case, many of these often ran afoul of MOS:SOB and MOS:OVERLINK and some were at least borderline for MOS:EGG problems. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 18:48, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, other respondents, and consistent with the outcome of dozens of similar RFDs. The notion that this should be treated differently as a possible plural is incoherent and inconsistent with actual (problematic) usage of the piped equivalent as well as with the designation of a primary topic. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 18:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Deployable Space Systems

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Light Dragon

• Light Dragon → The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom#Plot  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Should this redirect to Princess Zelda instead? (Oinkers42) (talk) 01:47, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

The term could also refer to the Vickers Light Dragon, though I have no opinion in this RfD. Fathoms Below (talk) 01:55, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom § Plot has more information and context than Princess Zelda currently does. A Google search seems to show that the Tears of the Kingdom character is by far the primary topic, although a hatnote for the Vickers Light Dragon may be appropriate. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk · edits) 15:23, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 07:00, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:59, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

FIFA World Cup (2026 )

• FIFA World Cup (2026 ) → 2026 FIFA World Cup  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

WP:RDAB error, note trailing space before closing parentheses. Note that FIFA World Cup (2026) already exists - delete. ScalarFactor (talk) 18:58, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete it has only existed since June and has always been a redirect. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:00, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:RDAB. Steel1943 (talk) 03:47, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 13:05, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete Jesus, is there an end to these types of redirects? | One Reaction was here. Got a complaint? 17:33, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Soviet occupation of Estonia

• Soviet occupation of Estonia → Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic#Soviet occupation of Estonia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Soviet occupation in Estonia → Occupation of the Baltic states  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

These should have the same target. Similar redirects for Lithuania redirect to Occupation of the Baltic states (while Soviet occupation of Latvia is a disambiguation page since there are separate articles for the 1940 and 1944 occupations). 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:47, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Note that Occupation of Estonia exists as a disambiguation page, though Occupation of Latvia is a disambiguation page separate from Soviet occupation of Latvia. 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:05, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

...and Soviet-occupied Estonia is another dab page. (Along with Soviet-occupied Latvia and Soviet-occupied Lithuania. Having three separate pages for the Latvia-related phrases seems a bit too redundant.) 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:15, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:58, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

NGST

• NGST → James Webb Space Telescope  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

NGST is more likely to refer to Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope (this redirect was last edited 22 years ago so that might explain it) _→AzaToth 17:11, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• "Next Generation Space telescope" (NGST) was the formal name for Webb before it was named, and the name survives in documents of the time (e.g. ). A dab page with both Webb and Roman would be a sensible use of NGST. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 17:19, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
  • To clarify, I prefer keep the redirect, absent evidence that NGST is actually used to refer to Nancy Grace. If there was evidence NGST was, or is used for both, only then would a dab be appropriate. A redir to Nancy Grace would not be appropriate. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 06:40, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per Finlay's first sentence. There's plenty of use for NGST referring to the James Webb Space Telescope, but I'm not seeing that for Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope. For example, ngst.nasa.gov still redirects to the James Webb page. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:48, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep - I don't think it's likely that NGST is being used mistakenly for the Nancy Grace Roman. Omitting the initial of her last name would be a strange mistake, and even NGRST isn't in common use (doesn't appear in Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope article). Danbloch (talk) 20:09, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Dab for both names per Finlay McWalter. NGST is now an obvious initial form for the Nancy Grace Roman telescope among groups of readers who will be searching for the telescope page but not sure of its exact name. Randy Kryn (talk) 00:43, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• keep per above but add hatnote to Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope --Lenticel ^(talk) 04:39, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment - If a DAB is created, keep in mind that NGST is not an accepted abbreviation for the Roman telescope, so the relevant guidance is MOS:DAB#Misspellings. This says Common misspellings should be listed only if there is a genuine risk of confusion or misspelling. These cross-links should be placed in a separate section entitled "Common misspellings" or "See also". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danbloch (talk • contribs) 17:22, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Springfield University

• Springfield University → Homer Goes to College  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Springfield Univeristy → Springfield College  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• University of Springfield → University of Illinois Springfield  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Should they have a common target? Jay 16:01, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep the two correct ones University of Springfield. The fictional one from The Simpsons is named "Springfield University" not "University of Springfield", so these aren't actually ambiguous per WP:SMALLDETAILS. The list of former names for the College don't include any with "University". I've added a hatnote at Homer Goes to College in case anyone uses "Springfield University" as short for "University of (Illinois) Springfield".

Delete Univeristy. Unlikely typo. If not deleted, sync with the correctly spelled redirect and tag as {{avoided double redirect}}. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 16:45, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Lean Retarget Springfield University to Springfield (The Simpsons) § Colleges/universities per Iggy Swan (below). The hatnote I added can be moved if this is retargeted. If not retargeted, keep, per my previous arguments. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 02:03, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Retarget Springfield University to Springfield_(The_Simpsons)#Colleges/universities and keep University of Springfield as it is to the right page. The Simpson's Springfield University also appears in other episodes such as Little Girl in the Big Ten and others. Iggy Swan (Contribs) 19:05, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

There's more substantial information there about the University itself than at Homer Goes to College. However, the section has no citations so I'm unsure if the target can be expected be stable. Another editor may decide to redact the section for lack of sources. For now, tentatively support this. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 02:00, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

I agree that Springfield (The Simpsons)#Colleges/universities is more fitting. I also agree that this can be retargeted if content is expanded, removed, or reorganized, but the overview at Springfield (The Simpsons)#Colleges/universities is a sensible place to collect information about the university's appearances in multiple episodes and to place it in the context of other colleges and universities that have appeared in the series. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 19:10, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget Springfield University to Springfield (The Simpsons)#Colleges/universities per discussion above; Keep University of Springfield; Delete Springfield Univeristy. Maintain or update hatnotes and the various targets, including Springfield College. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 19:05, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Manoj Kayande ( Politician)

• Manoj Kayande ( Politician) → Manoj Kayande  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible WP:RDAB error. Was BLAR'd as a duplicate but probably should have just been an A10, as a space before and a capitalized dab are both highly implausible. Recommend delete. ScalarFactor (talk) 15:29, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete the additional content was about his future plans and I don't see how that content would belong in the article so I don't think we need to keep the history which was only an article for about 10 minutes in 2024. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:04, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:RDAB. Steel1943 (talk) 03:54, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 05:34, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

San Fernando Valley Business Journal

• San Fernando Valley Business Journal → Los Angeles Business Journal  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget to Los Angeles Business Journal#Regional editions, as this is the section that actually mentions the San Fernando Valley Business Journal. ExitTheWarrior (talk) 15:29, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Regulatory Reform (Business Tenancies) ( England and Wales ) Order 2003

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete

Housing company

• Housing company → Housing cooperative  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Suggest deleting the redirect, as a company and a cooperative are inherently different entities. Urbourbo (talk) 13:06, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Depending on how broadly you define "company", a cooperative can be a type of company. Regardless, this is ambiguous. Could also refer to housing associations. Possibly also to homeowner associations. Maybe a disambiguation page is possible? – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 14:16, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Useless in its current form. Either delete or turn into a DAB page per Scyrme. RoySmith (talk) 13:22, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Proxima Fornacis

• Proxima Fornacis → LP 944-20  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Doesn't appear to be a thing. Vgbypw (talk) 12:44, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete, clear WP:OR. 21 Andromedae (talk) 19:10, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Proxima Equulei

• Proxima Equulei → HD 200779  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Doesn't appear to be a thing. Vgbypw (talk) 12:43, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete, clear WP:OR. 21 Andromedae (talk) 19:10, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Proxima Delphini

• Proxima Delphini → WISEPC J205628.90+145953.3  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There appears to be no sources for this connection (Proxima Delphini and WISEPC J205628.90+145953.3). Vgbypw (talk) 12:40, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

See prior discussion. Arlo James Barnes (pro-∪nion) 16:26, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Neutral (for all three "Proxima" redirects): I'm not aware of any source that uses these names, but these are verifiably the nearest (known) objects in their constellations, per Kirkpatrick et al. 2024 table B1. SevenSpheres (talk) 14:59, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete, clear WP:OR. 21 Andromedae (talk) 19:09, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Dinny Corcoran

• Dinny Corcoran → Wexford F.C.#Current squad  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No longer an applicable redirect as Corcoran does not play for Wexford anymore; he appears to be retired per this. ser! ^{(chat to me - see my edits)} 09:09, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete; there are plenty of mentions onsite (e.g. Drogheda United F.C., 2018 Bohemian F.C. season, Malahide Community School, Louth Derby, and List of 2009–10 League of Ireland transfers) and in this instance the most helpful thing for the reader is access to search results. J947 ‡ ^edits 01:31, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Sonja, King Mother

• Sonja, King Mother → Queen Sonja of Norway  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not sure if this is a faithful rendition of her Norwegian title, Kongemor which means "the king's mother" and would be similar to My Lady the King's Mother or Gunnhild, Mother of Kings. But I cannot find "King Mother" in the sources and as such I don't think this redirect can be a viable search term or be used in a prose. Sonja, the King's Mother can be created as an alternative. Keivan.f^Talk 06:16, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

I support the usage of both redirects proposed by Keivan.f, the more the better if there are potential other terms used than the article title.

(Side note: Hooking on to our discussion about the queen mother/queen dowager terms at Talk:Queen_Sonja_of_Norway#Queen_dowager/Queen_mother, the fact that her official title's literal translation is "the King Mother" proves by analogy my point that "queen mother" can be interpreted as "mother of the queen".) Marbe166 (talk) 07:15, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

"King mother" is not standard English; it sounds like a compound noun, but is generally unnatural. the fact that her official title's literal translation is "the King Mother" Only if you consider kongemor as a compound word like kingmaker or schoolteacher, then yes it could be translated as "king mother". So far we haven't had an update to the Norwegian royal website which has their bios in English so it would be interesting to see how they would be translating this title. That being said, queen mother isn't grammatically the same as "queen's mother"; it's a conventional title/role as I had mentioned before. Keivan.f^Talk 04:15, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep as a plausible if ungrammatical literal translation of Kongemor, without prejudice to the creation of other redirects (perhaps Queen Sonja the Queen Mother mirroring Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother, for example). As an aside, I've created a redirect for KongemorKongemor, targeting Queen mother#Norway. Rosbif73 (talk) 09:32, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

  But I do wonder if Kongemor is rendered as "King Mother" in English; as I mentioned earlier, it is not standard English. I really don't think we should encourage the use of unconfirmed names or titles that are not common names of the subjects either. The closest thing we have in English is My Lady the King's Mother. If anyone else can put forward a source please go ahead. An update from the English webpage on the Norwegian royal court is also not available at the moment, so we have to rely on other sources for now. Keivan.f^Talk 04:15, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

  "King Mother" is not a correct translation of Kongemor, of course, but it is a plausible mistranslation that a non-native English speaker might search for. It's not as though the meaning of "Queen Mother", a former queen consort who is the mother of the current monarch, is transparent for someone unfamiliar with the term. Redirects are WP:CHEAP and this one is harmless. Rosbif73 (talk) 07:44, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Epimorph

• Epimorph → Morphine  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is also Pseudomorph#Epimorph and incrustation pseudomorph. 1234qwer1234qwer4 05:57, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget per nom. The geologic use is much more prevalent than as a obscure synonym for morphine, and is the only mention in Wikipedia. A redirect hatnote to morphine can be added at the new target section if desired. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:55, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment what about Epimorphism? Its a brand name not a synonym of morphine and has decent usage (about 10% of all scholar hits) in relation to morphine. Maybe a disambiguation is needed? Traumnovelle (talk) 20:20, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

  what about Epimorphism? – what about it? 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:08, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Declared

• Declared → Declaration and forfeiture  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is certainly not exclusive to cricket, and this doesn't look like something that would be more related to or connected with cricket than, for example, Declaration (law). Mathguy2718 (talk) 05:52, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Declaration#Other uses for numerous other contexts in which one might "declare" something. Rosbif73 (talk) 11:40, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per my rationale at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 27#Affordable, which seems to apply here as well: This is a commonly-used word in various phrases, thus making it rather vague to have any specific target. Steel1943 (talk) 03:56, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Peter Sam (person)

• Peter Sam (person) → The Railway Series#Thin Controller  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No such section. The Peter Sam mentioned in the #Books section is a fictional engine character, not a person. Peter Sam's description in the characters list page says the tank engine was named after the previous controller, also a fictional character, not a real person. If we are looking at an association with real life, the engine was based on Edward Thomas (locomotive), which in turn was named after Edward Thomas, the former manager of the Talyllyn Railway. Delete as an incorrect and misleading disambiguator. Jay 05:25, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Declare independence

• Declare independence → Declaration of independence  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Declaring independence → Declaration of independence  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Declared independence → Declaration of independence  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Too vague for the current target. Many places and people have dared to declare independence from one thing or another. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 03:48, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep - I don't see what other encyclopedic topics these would refer to. Search results on Wikipedia for "declare independence" and "declaring independence" are overwhelmingly for states/countries doing this in the sense of the current target. Declared independence should also be bundled (to which I also say keep for the same reason; see "declared independence"). – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 10:20, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep all per Scyrme (I've bundled Declared independence as suggested). Rosbif73 (talk) 11:45, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep all per Scyrme. "Declaration of independence" may also refer to non-geopolitical declarations as the nominator argues. However, its primary topic is geopolitical declarations and so, if to perhaps a slightly lesser extent, are these redirects'. J947 ‡ ^edits 01:13, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Runescape.co.uk

• Runescape.co.uk → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runscape → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runesccape → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Rnescape → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescappe → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• RunescapeRunescape → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescaspe → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescpae → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Roonscape → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescapes → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescape(RS) → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• RuneScape2 → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescape2 → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescape modrators → RuneScape#Rules and cheating  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 October 7 § Roonscape – keep

Nominating implausible typos for deletion. While Jagex does own runescape.co.uk, its only real use is to prevent cybersquatting, as their primary domain is .com. I have left ones that are more on the edge, such as Rune Scape and RUNESCAPE (someone transcribing the game logo could easily hit these). Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 10:11, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• I think Runescape in particular is a plausible search for RuneScape and should be kept. No opinion on others. Meelar (talk) 12:08, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  I didn't mean to nominate that one. Thanks for catching it! Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 12:27, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep RuneScape2 (and Runescape2). External search results show the game was referred to in this way without a space. (eg. IGN article) – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 18:53, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  Keep Runscape, which has non-negligible all-time traffic (>800 total views). There's a UK-based running holiday firm by the name "RunScape Adventures" so maybe some of the hits are for them. However, external search results, especially on YouTube, do also show some uses which are unambiguously for RuneScape not for the UK firm. It seems reasonable to assume at least some of the traffic is looking for the game and would be helped by the redirect. Since the firm does not (yet) pass WP:NCORP and Wikipedia does not disambiguate for topics it does not have coverage for, the ambiguity does not need to be addressed. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 19:15, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  Keep Runescpae. Plausible typo. External search results show many examples off-Wikipedia, and the total all time traffic (>300), though low, is more than would be expected from just typical background traffic redirects get just by existing. The traffic resembles more what would be expected for the occasional mistyped search. WP:R#K5: it's helpful to someone. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 19:25, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  Delete the rest. Their all-time total traffic is negligible, suggesting these aren't actually helpful to anyone regardless of our assumptions about what is and isn't a plausible typo. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 19:28, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete all "RuneScape2" was a typo for "RuneScape 2", there was never such a game as far as I can tell. The rest are implausible errors. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:13, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  Looking closer at the results, I think you're right about it being a typo. However, it being a typo isn't a reason to delete by itself. There are plenty of {{r from typo}} redirects. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 19:20, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  Turns out a lot of the hits are for things like #runescape2, Jmod-testing-item-RuneScape2-Beta-Items, etc. though there are some genuine examples of use on forums, blogs etc. besides the IGN article I linked earlier (eg. ). However, the examples are few and the all time traffic for the redirects themselves is low enough to be dismissed as background traffic, so ultimately there's no evidence anyone has actually been searching in this way. Seems fine to delete them. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 19:36, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep most. Most of these I see as plausible typos, especially the phonetic ones and the no space sequel redirects. The website is fine; it's a British company so it's plausible to think that it'd be .co.uk. Delete Runescape modrators, Runescape(RS), Runescappe, Runesccape. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:16, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Added old RfD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 ‡ ^edits 02:51, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

I'd agree with Tavix, though Runescaspe does not seem plausible either and Runescpae does not look that useful too. 1234qwer1234qwer4 06:01, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Resident Evil ( 2026)

• Resident Evil ( 2026) → Resident Evil (2026 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible WP:RDAB error - extra space before the year in the parentheses. Could either move to Resident Evil (2026) without leaving a redirect or just delete - unsure if this is a desired dab format. ScalarFactor (talk) 01:43, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete with the intention of making another redirect under Resident Evil (2026). | One Reaction was here. Got a complaint? 13:51, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete it has always been a redirect and has existed for less than a week. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:06, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:RDAB. Steel1943 (talk) 22:31, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Elio ( 2024 film)

• Elio ( 2024 film) → Elio (film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete - WP:RDAB error and incorrect disambiguation (the film is actually a 2025 film). {{R from incorrect disambiguation}} is fine in some cases but this is double-implausible due to the extra space. ScalarFactor (talk) 01:41, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. | One Reaction was here. Got a complaint? 13:52, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete it was an article for about 15 minutes in 2023 and doesn't appear to have any useful history. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:09, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:RDAB. Steel1943 (talk) 22:31, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Mithai ( 2018 )

• Mithai ( 2018 ) → Mithai (film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete - Was at this title for about a month and a half in 2018, but highly implausible WP:RDAB error - only the year as disambiguator, with spaces both before and after. ScalarFactor (talk) 01:39, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. | One Reaction was here. Got a complaint? 13:52, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:10, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per RHARMFUL ("if a redirect is reasonably old (or is the result of moving a page that has been there for quite some time), then it is possible that its deletion will break incoming links", so "consider the deletion only of either harmful redirects or of recent ones") and K4 ("redirects resulting from page moves should not normally be deleted without good reason"). The idea that it is highly implausible that readers will come across this redirect is not a legitimate reason for deletion, nor accurate. This redirect has received a whopping 13,000 pageviews since it was created. J947 ‡ ^edits 01:06, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:RDAB. In addition, if the space is between the parentheses and the disambiguator were not hardcoded spaces, there could also be an argument for WP:MIXEDSCRIPT issues since such punctuation is traditionally done in some Asian languages not specific to the target. Steel1943 (talk) 04:00, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Chicken pot pie

• Chicken pot pie → Chicken Pot Pie  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget to Pot pie. This is an absurd redirect created in 2019. I believe no one who who would be searching this up is looking for the song. NightWolf1223 <Howl at me • My hunts> 01:23, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep You know, it would have been easier to be WP:BOLD and retarget it yourself rather than doing the formal process. No-one would have objected because its a low traffic redirect. I know I was the one who did the redirect and I have no objections to retargeting. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 07:50, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Pot pie per WP:DIFFCAPS. Pot pie mentions chicken as a filling, so would not be surprising. It already has a hatnote to the song. Pot pie was the long-standing target after a 2006 BLAR until The C of E retargeted it in 2019. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 11:05, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Neapolitan Republic ( 1799)

• Neapolitan Republic ( 1799) → Parthenopean Republic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:RDAB - Error in act of disambiguation (space before year). Note Neapolitan Republic (1799) already exists. ScalarFactor (talk) 00:12, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Uncontroversial maintenance. Would have been eligible for a speedy deletion if it had been caught earlier. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 11:08, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. | One Reaction was here. Got a complaint? 13:58, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete although it has existed since 2021 it has always been a redirect. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:11, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:RDAB. Steel1943 (talk) 04:01, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

September 24

Kēnana

• Kēnana → Taipa–Mangōnui  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Separate locality https://gazetteer.linz.govt.nz/place/24929 and also the former name of another locality Canaan Landing

Kenana is presumed notable under NGEO so this should be returned to red. Traumnovelle (talk) 23:36, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Cinnamon Bun in Dress

• Cinnamon Bun in Dress → List of Adventure Time characters#Cinnamon Bun  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete This is a gender swapped version of Cinnamon Bun. She appears in the background of a few episodes. Not mentioned on target. (Oinkers42) (talk) 23:19, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. ScalarFactor (talk) 00:13, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:01, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Kareponia

• Kareponia → Awanui  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Separate locality to Awanui https://gazetteer.linz.govt.nz/place/24655

Return to red as its presumed notable under WP:NGEO Traumnovelle (talk) 23:15, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Katniss

• Katniss → Sagittaria  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Katniss Everdeen is the clear primary topic. Page views for Katniss Everdeen vastly outweigh views for Sagittaria (see the graph), even before taking into account that "katniss" is just one of many alternative names for Sagittaria. 🦬 Beefaloe 🦬 (talk) 07:44, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose: Katniss isn't just one of the alternative names, but one which is used multiple times in the page. Search results for "katniss" produce the character second, so anyone searching for that can easily find what they're looking for, and even if they happen to land on the plant's article anyway, the hatnote is sufficient. Unsurprising that the page views weigh in favor of a fictional character from a popular franchise over a random plant species, but that shouldn't be the only determining factor when there's other value in keeping this redirect as is. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 08:53, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:SMALLDETAILS. The character has a last name, and anyone looking for information about that specifically should be reasonably expected to both know it, and include it in a search. If they don't know it, or they're just too lazy to enter it, the hatnote at the current target gets them there. I also don't buy the pageviews argument in a vacuum, since it doesn't tell us how many had to click through the hatnote instead. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:40, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

  I don't agree that readers should be reasonably expected to ... include it in a search. That would be true if "Katniss" were a common given name, but it isn't (or wasn't until the books/films briefly made it a popular baby name). According to Ancestry.com, the name "Katniss" is a 21st-century creation, suggesting it wasn't ever used as a personal name prior to the publication of the Hunger Games. Ancestry.com isn't the most reliable source, but I wasn't able to find anything that contradicts this.

  Regardless, readers may reasonably think it was wholly made up for the books, like many names of fictional characters in sci-fi settings are, especially if they aren't aware of the plant or only know it by another name. In that context, it's reasonable for readers to expect the first name would be enough. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 00:07, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Katniss Everdeen with a hatnote to the plant. I agree the character is the primary topic.
  Regarding the pageviews, while it's true that it's difficult to tell how many of the views for Sagittaria were clicking through the hatnote, if you look at the all-time stats for Katniss itself, there's an obvious trend of gradual decline over time since 2015. The most plausible explanation for this is that the traffic for Katniss reflects the declining cultural relevance of the Hunger Games. I really doubt these stats are reflecting trends in interest for the plant. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 00:19, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: the Hunger Games character gets more page views, sure, but I fail to be convinced that she has enough long-term significance to be primary for her given name alone. And while this wasn't a common given name prior to the publication of the series, there are other potentially notable people with the name or nickname  – and even an orca with a mention on wikipedia! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosbif73 (talk • contribs) 07:34, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. I, for one, would probably search for just "Katniss" when searching, and am not sure I would've remembered her last name. Long-term significance is useful up to a point: if the vast majority of searchers are trying to find a particular article and we can expect this to continue for at least a number of years, then we should help them. The wikipedians of twenty years from now can worry about whether the book series has been sufficiently forgotten for the plant to be the primary topic again. Rusalkii (talk) 16:13, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  @Rusalkii: "Keep" would mean "Katniss" redirects to the plant, not the character. Do you mean "Retarget"? Or did I misunderstand your argument? – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 18:30, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  Er, yes, I meant retarget. My bad. Rusalkii (talk) 18:58, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus is currently torn between keep or retarget. Which one would be better?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LazyLune (talk • edits) 23:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Tom Tipper

• Tom Tipper → List of The Railway Series and Thomas & Friends characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No information about this character at the target. There are mentions in other articles though I do not see any as an ideal primary target. There are mentions of a Tom Tipper / Thomas Tipper at Beer in Sussex and Music of Sussex about a Newhaven brewer on whom a song was also written. Delete to favour search results. I thought about a disambig, but could not come up with an entry for the brewer.

This was an unsourced 2-paragraph stub that lasted from 2005 to 2006. It was merged to its then target, but trimmed over time, and subsequently removed, before it became a redirect itself. No reason to provide attribution. Jay 07:09, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep - I re-added Tom Tipper to the target article. Based upon the diff you provided, I do not see any reason for the character's removal from the list, and so I conclude that it was done accidentally (after all, the edit was meant to add other minor characters to the list). Accordingly, I think the redirect is now sensible. I do not think the other mentions of Tom Tipper are significant enough to warrant a DAB or hatnote. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 18:15, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 15:26, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

That's fair. But the section already had multiple issues including needs citations, and I have added one more for Tom Tipper. Jay 09:53, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LazyLune (talk • edits) 23:02, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Cuong Tran

• Cuong Tran → Alaska Airlines Flight 1282  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at all at the redirect target. Delete. Penn65 (talk|cont) 22:49, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Cuong Tran's name appeared in news reports as one of the passengers injured during the incident, but as an otherwise low-profile individual his name has rightly been removed from the article per WP:LPNAME. Rosbif73 (talk) 07:43, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep - Tran was one of the main people who was injured during this flight, and may be a valid search term. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:03, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Emoji 14.0

• Emoji 14.0 → Emoji#14.0  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This version of the Unicode Standard is not mentioned in target — SimpleObjects-9ei 🍂/🌰/🤗 (see talk) 21:38, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Google Beta

• Google Beta → Google Search  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unmentioned at target, and probably hopelessly vague anyway. Lots of software is available as some sort of beta version early on, and this doesn't seem to refer to anything specifically named "Beta". Delete. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 19:37, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Knifing

• Knifing → Stabbing  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

only refers exclusively to stabbing as a noun. as a verb, it refers to stabbing, slashing, carving, betraying, ignoring, overcharging, and... sharpening non-knife objects with knives? who the hell uses it for that?

i'm a little torn between deleting and soft redirecting to wikt:knife#verb, though consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 18:59, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. Even if we say this is ambiguous, stabbing is the primary topic and the ambiguity can be resolved by a hatnote to cutting.

"Slashing" and "stabbing" aren't meaningfully different; it's the same crime - to kill or injure someone with a knife/blade. (cf. Slasher film) The sense "betraying" is from the expression "knifed [stabbed] in the back", so is in-fact also being used in the sense of "stabbing". The sense of "overcharging" is related to expressions like "gouging", so, again, is also being used to mean "stabbing", albeit in a broader metaphoric sense.

I've never heard of anyone using "knifing/knifed/etc." to mean "carving/carved/etc." or "ignoring/ignored/etc.", though apparently these are being used in the sense of "cut" rather than "stab". These can be handled b a {{redirect}} note pointing to cutting and/or cutting (disambiguation), or a new knifing (disambiguation) that links to Carving and Ignoring if we think these narrower uses in the sense of "cutting" are plausible searches and wouldn't fit within the existing cutting (disambiguation). – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 20:01, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

That said, imo, the broader, more straightforward meaning of cutting is much more plausible than carving or ignoring; the latter interpretations seem like unlikely searches to me. If someone were searching for those topics, they probably wouldn't type "knifing" into the search bar to look for them. I personally don't think hatnoting to them is warranted, but won't object if others disagree. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 20:16, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

yeah, a hatnote would also work consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 20:54, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Nursing care plan for tuberculosis

• Nursing care plan for tuberculosis → Tuberculosis  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is an odd one. There's no discussion of the topic at the target nor at Management of tuberculosis. The pre-BLAR content is an entirely unsourced article about the nurse role in general. I looked at several versions and found no mention of tuberculosis. This was supposedly moved to Patient carePatient care in January 2006 but the history and article remained at this title; it was BLAR'd six minutes post-move. This does get some views but the topic is not discussed so readers do not find what they are looking for. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 16:24, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, not useful/plausible as a search term, and the BLAR was 20 years ago, with what was there completely unsourced and essay-like. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 17:01, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  I may be missing something with the history, but it looks like Patient care was moved here instead of the other way around, and then Patient care was retargeted to Health care. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 17:04, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  AH, yeah. I think my coffee hadn't kicked in when I looked at this! Still can't make heads or tails of why that was done, given the total absence of any mention of tuberculosis. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 22:30, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, when you type in "Nursing care plan" in the search bar it autosuggests "Nursing care plan for tuberculosis" as the only other suggestion, likely leading to people clicking on it expecting an article on the topic and not a redirect to the page on tuberculosis. ເສລີພາບ (talk) 17:23, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Kellie Chauvin

• Kellie Chauvin → Derek Chauvin#Personal life  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible redirect and a BLP violation. The ex wife of Derek Chauvin is not notably connected to the event that made Derek Chauvin notable. - The literary leader of the age ✉ 15:29, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete unmentioned at target and a BLPCRIME issue. Traumnovelle (talk) 20:21, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:16, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Mental clarity

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

University college entrance program

• University college entrance program → University and College Entrance Preparation Program  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Page was moved with rationale "The original title was of something completely different with no sources, leading me to believe it was all hallucinated", which suggests that this is not the name for anything and should be deleted. University and college admission is a possible retarget, but this is a fairly implausible search term. ~ A412 ^talk! 15:17, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: delete or retarget to University and college admission?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:28, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Low pageviews supports nom's assertion that this is a fairly implausible search term. (The normal search results will serve the user just fine.) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 17:59, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Logos, The

• Logos, The → Logos  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

not a title or proper noun in need of sorting, so its intended use is unclear. "the logos" doesn't exist (well, it did, but was speedy deleted as g11 ages ago), so if this isn't deleted, that should probably be created consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 13:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom, implausible. मल्ल (talk) 14:34, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment - I don't have a strong opinion on whether this redirect is helpful, but it's worth noting that "the Logos" often is treated as a proper noun, especially when used as a synonym of God the Son (target of God the Word). In general it is common for "Logos" to be treated as a proper noun in the contexts of Christianity (see Logos (Christianity)) and Neoplatonic philosophy. If the redirect is not deleted it should be categorised as {{r from sort name}}. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 23:31, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Also worth noting that "logos" without capitalisation could be interpreted as a plural for "logo", however, Logos still treats the Greek term as the primary topic and the inclusion of a definite article ("the") strengthens the religion/philosophy interpretations over the plural for "logo". – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 23:35, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

it's not one in need of sorting, that is. it's a little like having "son, the" for that guy who almost sawed a baby in half consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 11:32, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

TNT Sports International

• TNT Sports International → TNT Sports  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This was created with the perception to have the target become a DAB page instead of an overview or set index article much like Disney Channel (disambiguation), Disney Channel (international) and Warner Bros. (the post-2025 version). The US version has its title already DABbed from a rebranding from "Turner Sports" and "WBD Sports". Should this tite stay or go? Intrisit (talk) 11:02, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

LGTM

• LGTM → wiktionary:Special:Search/lgtm  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Procedural nomination from WP:Articles for deletion/LGTM. Original deletion reasoning (from User:Johnjbarton): "This topic does not meet the notability guidelines. Having a page say that we don't have a page is silly and pointless. We are not a dictionary and we are not a forwarding service for Wikitionary." I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 20:02, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

• The problem they have is with the existence of WP:SOFTSP, not this redirect specifically. I'll suggest closing this nom and taking those concerns to the guideline talk page. In the mean time, I personally see a argument for deletion to rebut (I am the author of the redirect) and so will vote to keep. Sohom (talk) 20:06, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. The nomination may be lacking, but random terms/abbreviations should never have Wikt soft redirects. They obstruct in-WP searches, which offer a prominent link to the Wiktionary entry if there is one. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 21:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:SOFTSP. – The Grid (talk) 00:57, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete like I said originally. Johnjbarton (talk) 02:01, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep, also per WP:SOFTSP. Seems reasonable for somebody to look up this term on Wikipedia, but there is little secondary coverage about the term, so it doesn't meet criteria for a Wikipedia article, but we can still help the reader learn something by sending them to the entry on Wiktionary. Dreamyshade (talk) 02:24, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  But why Wikitionary? The link resolves to an unreliable source. We would not allow wikitionary as a source, why do we send readers to it? The original article had legit sources, this is downgrade. Johnjbarton (talk) 03:03, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  While I have no opinion on whether this particular redirect should go to wiktionary, this strikes me as about the same argument as "we don't allow wikipedia as a source, why do we send readers to it?" It's accepted practice to redirect things to wiktionary sometimes, if you object to that in the general case you need an RfC not an RfD for this individual instance of it. Rusalkii (talk) 04:54, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: This is not exclusive to the current target as this appears to be the code letters for a few ships and also refers to some other initialisms. Search seems to be the best option as it links to the Wiktionary entry but at an appropriate size that doesn't downplay other uses of "LGTM" (which get hidden when using {{Wiktionary redirect}}). Mathguy2718 (talk) 03:13, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  Your argument adds more reason for "LGTM" to exist, not for deletion. The call signs for HMS Worcestershire and USS Ameera could make LGTM into a disambiguation page which also allows for a direct link to Wikitonary. There's also several discussions with the abbreviation's usage. I'm surprised @CycloneYoris: is asking for more input as there's been nothing solid for the deletion arguments. – The Grid (talk) 18:28, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep, useful redirect that targets a useful page. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:25, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:51, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

.kids

• .kids → List of Internet top-level domains  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Procedural nomination - Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 6#.kid closed as delete and this should probably have the same fate, but given that it has merged history I'd like to give it an actual discussion. Rusalkii (talk) 22:04, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep/improve. Unlike .kid, this is now a TLD that can be registered. Using https://icannwiki.org/.kids (or rather its references) and https://www.nic.kids/dotkids-files/policies/KIDS-Guiding-Principles--COMPLETEv1-1--20220701.pdf (primary source for restrictions, e.g. don't register a .kids domain to depict gross violence) as starting points, I think it could be sufficient for an article. I have been told (so don't take this as gospel) that merged cases like these would need to be kept anyway due to WP:ATTREQ, unless revisions it was merged into are deleted, perhaps with Template:R from merge for clarify. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 23:21, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

  It turns out .kids.us existed but the Dot Kids Act and DotKids Foundation are unrelated. There's a slight risk of confusion there, no biggie. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 23:41, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

  Attribution can be handled with a dummy edit listing the authors of the merged content, as long as there aren't too many of them. That's what I did on .kid. If there are there's other methods for dealing with it as well, so deleting something with merged history is somewhat less convenient but not actually forbidden. Rusalkii (talk) 02:00, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: I initially created this page in 2006. My general view is that we should have at least redirects for all top-level domains (TLDs). For bigger TLDs we should have sections or even articles such as .sx. Why not? --MZMcBride (talk) 16:53, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - unless I'm missing something, .kids is not mentioned at the target, and kids is only mentioned as the translation of .дети. If it is added to the target I would support keeping it. But even then, it seems like it should probably be added to List of English-language generic Internet top-level domains? ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 17:26, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per El cid. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:34, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:50, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Bursty star formation

• Bursty star formation → Cosmology  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I propose deleting this, because although there's some relevance to physical cosmology per the article linked in the edit summary , it's not mentioned on either page. The creator is globally blocked, so I haven't notified him. Canadachick (talk) 18:14, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, DrBogdanSpam. No information about this at the target (now or at redirection creation time too, I think). –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 22:54, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment: This term is mentioned in a few articles like Quenching (astronomy). In Infinity Galaxy it's linked to Starburst region, though the exact term isn't mentioned there. SevenSpheres (talk) 16:07, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

It shouldn't be deleted then. It should be redirected either to Starburst region or somewhere else. Canadachick (talk) 16:16, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:48, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Bowser's Castle

• Bowser's Castle → Super Mario  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Bowser’s Castle → Mario (franchise)#Bowser's Castle  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not sure what to do about this one. Neither target article seems to mention anything substantial about the subject of this redirect. In addition, the article Bowser also seems to not include specific information about the subject of this redirect in a way that would satisfy a reader researching this term. However, looks like this redirect had an article here that was WP:BLARed in 2008: . Steel1943 (talk) 12:10, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

• ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. It shows up as a stage in Mario Kart 64 (and probably other MK games too), where there's a brief mention, but nothing substantial. Ditto as the final level of Super Mario World, and probably other Mario games too. I don't think we can keep these at either target, so lean delete unless anyone else has a better idea at least. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:23, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete, essentially as a sort of hacky way to return to red. bowser has had different castles in pretty much every piece of media since his debut and childhood, outright churning through them in some games (such as new soup), and his children tend to follow suit with castles of their own, so the term hardly narrows it down. if any one castle, set of castles, or the general concept manages to have some coverage found to at least warrant a mention (or even an article), it might then be a somewhat good idea to recreate this, but i haven't found anything specific or substantial enough at the moment consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 15:55, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
• Restore Mushroom Kingdom and retarget there. I will once again use this opportunity to express my displeasure at the outcome of the AfD. If I had seen it at the time I would have !voted to keep it. Plenty of sources exist as was demonstrated by Zxcvbnm. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:35, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

  @Tavix Content is preserved, you can be bold, restore it with better sources and it will likely survive (if the sources are indeed useful). _{Piotrus at Hanyang| reply here} 03:15, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  I'm surprised by that AfD as well. If you restore it and it gets deleted then I will support it being kept in a future discussion. ເສລີພາບ (talk) 17:27, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:47, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• RfD lacks jurisidiction to restore Mushroom Kingdom as AfD< which is superior in that area, has said it shouldn't exist as an article. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:22, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  to be mildly unfair, i'd prefer if this was its own article instead, but my research hasn't been that fruitful yet, so it stays in the realm of wishful thinking for now consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 11:46, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Trattoria Records

• Trattoria Records → Cornelius (musician)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete: Only mentioned in discography of target page so nothing is learned from this redirect. No other valid targets with any further information. Apparently not notable so I don't see a reason to keep for the history or anything. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 08:47, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. The label has almost 300 releases and has signed other artists besides Cornelius; not only should it be covered on Cornelius's page more expansively, but it might be worthy of restoration as an article. This was probably thoughtlessly redirected when it should have been merged, like so much other record label content. Chubbles (talk) 11:42, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  @Chubbles would you be willing to convert it back to an article then? If there's a valid article that's fine, but I don't think it's appropriate for a redirect or merge target because the label is a separate entity from Cornelius (he didn't found it or anything, he was just signed to it). The currently existing redirect doesn't help anyone because all they learn from Cornelius' page is that some of his albums came out on that label. You could learn that from Discogs or anywhere else, but Wikipedia is dedicated to substantial biographical information, not facts better suited to a database. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 22:21, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  From what I can tell, Cornelius founded the label, but it may well be worthy of a separate article that I will not be able to contribute to in the next several days (I am traveling). I see no reason that a merge couldn't happen here as well. Chubbles (talk) 23:44, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:45, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• I merged the former content of Trattoria into Cornelius's article. I think there's really no good reason to delete this redirect. Chubbles (talk) 04:57, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Soviet invasion of Lithuania

• Soviet invasion of Lithuania → Soviet occupation of the Baltic states (1940)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Maybe better to point at Occupation of the Baltic states given the 1944 re-occupation. This is also where Soviet invasion of the BalticsSoviet invasion of the Baltics redirects (as well as Soviet invasion of the Baltic statesSoviet invasion of the Baltic states, which I just created in accordance). 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:11, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: The military occupation happen in 1940 and I think that article should be improved to describe events up to the annexation in greater detail. "Occupation of the Baltic states" is a more comprehensive article giving a better overall picture, but perhaps we shouldn't redirect there solely on this basis. I have some material on this subject, so maybe some day I'll expand that article. --Mindaur (talk) 08:34, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:39, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Occupation of the Baltic states, for consistency with Soviet invasion of the Baltics. The 1944 re-occupation is covered there too. Signahistar (talk) 13:44, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

La Plan

• La Plan → Planet of the Apes (novel)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of this at the target...it's not the French title, or anything apparently related –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:00, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: I haven't read Planet of the Apes, and I am not familiar with the media franchise either. Perhaps La Plan is somehow significant to one of the movies, TV shows or comics? If so, then we should retarget accordingly; if not, we should delete. Either way, I'd want to get more opinions from people who are more familiar with Planet of the Apes than I am. In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 15:47, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:38, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete as incomplete. as it turns out, "la planète des singes" has a few more letters than that, and i trust people to be able to finish writing thei consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 12:29, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:26, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Waverly Park

• Waverly Park → List of parks in the Louisville metropolitan area#Other parks managed by Louisville Metro Parks  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Should this redirect to a list entry for a minor, non-notable park in Louisville, or should this redirect to a former major stadium that has hosted events with over 90,000 people? I would say the stadium is the more common article that people are looking for. Steelkamp (talk) 08:36, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Waverly Park in Louisville, a somewhat major US city, is not spelled "Waverley Park". There has been no determination of whether this park is notable; not having an article yet isn't proof of non-notability. At any rate, to help things a bit, per MOS:DABMISSPELL, I added a "See also" to Waverley Park (disambiguation) to show this differently spelled entity. the Stefen 𝕋ower 08:42, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  Also of note is that Waverly Park (Louisville) currently exists as a city park, and not a small one at 297.13 acres. Waverley Park is defunct. the Stefen 𝕋ower 08:50, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment my search results are 50/50 between typos of Waverley and the Louisville park. Results relating to the stadium are half of the typos. Traumnovelle (talk) 23:10, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

  My Google search of "waverly park" is mostly results for Waverley Park (lots of mispellings out there), plus an assortment of other parks in Hobart, Seattle, Florida, California, and Louisville. Steelkamp (talk) 02:18, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment. Looks like there are some other Waverly Park's mentioned on Wikipedia. If we are going to go the route of not redirecting this to Waverley Park, then this page should become a disambiguation page for all those parks mentioned on Wikipedia. Steelkamp (talk) 02:13, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

BYD Atto 4

• BYD Atto 4 → BYD Seal  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. No mention of the redirect as an alternative vehicle name. Inpops (talk) 17:15, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: the Seal is apparently marketed as the Atto 4 in some markets, per . A mention should probably be added to the target article. Rosbif73 (talk) 12:25, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:36, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Tapia, Andres de

• Tapia, Andres de → Andrés de Tapia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A redirect from a sorting name, except the name is incorrectly partitioned. The correct title is de Tapia, Andres. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 06:02, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment - ehh dunno really ifl I've seen this sort of partitioning before? have also seen de Tapia, Andres ofc so maybe both are ok? not too sure on this. - Asdfjrjjj (talk) 06:10, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

The "de" is unambiguously part of the surname. It's equivalent to partitioning "Leonardo da Vinci" as "Vinci, Leonardo da" instead of "da Vinci, Leonardo". – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 15:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Yes exactly!, I've seen both styles used in authoritative sources (bio dictionaries, scholarship in general really - and on WP too ofc), so I'm not sold on one being incorrect and the other correct, they both look and are acceptable afaik :/ - would say keep rdr in that case - Asdfjrjjj (talk) 12:53, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. ScalarFactor (talk) 21:17, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:35, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete created in a bot-like fashion. Unlikely to be used by a human. Traumnovelle (talk) 23:07, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. Old Spanish names use this format because "de" was not part of their surname, it indicated who were their parents or from where they were from. For modern names, the preposition is now part of the surname. This is explained at WP:LISTAS and Spanish naming customs. Tbhotch^™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 20:40, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

  According to WP:LISTAS:

  Sometimes the name containing the prefix is not a family name, but a description of where the person is from. In these cases, the sort value is how the entire name is spelled. For Peire de Corbiac, "de Corbiac" is a description where Peire is from, the town of Corbiac. So, the name means 'Peire of or from Corbiac' and is sorted {{DEFAULTSORT:Peire de Corbiac}}.

  So even if we apply this, the redirect is still incorrect as the sort name should not be partitioned at all. (This would also mean De Tapia, Andres is also wrong so maybe it should be bundled.) – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 20:54, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

  it shouldn't be bundled, as that's a different flavor of wrong in other contexts (and also this one) consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 21:24, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

  He is not French, he is Spanish, so I don't know why you selected the French customs instead the right customs immediately above: Generally, Dutch, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, and Swedish names do not include lowercase particles in sorting, but do include uppercase particles. That "generally" is what I said above, for old names "de" and variants are not part of the surname; for modern names "de" and variants are part of the surname. Furthermore "Andrés de Tapia" was not his birth name, it would have been Andrés de Navarrete y González. He took "Andrés de Tapia" when he was given the title of "señor del Castillo de Tapia", a castle (I assume that) formerly existed near León, Spain. Something called Tapia must have existed in the area (example Rioseco de Tapia, literally "dryriver of Tapia"). The sorting is not incorrect, it is just a reflect of the lack of customs that were adopted until the 1800s. Tbhotch^™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 21:56, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

  The section I quoted isn't about French customs. The example is French, but it applies generally to cases where the particle is not part of a surname. The earlier section you quote is not applicable because it's applies to a surname, not to a description of where the person is from, which is what you argued this was. The additional context you've provided here clearly indicates that "de Tapia" isn't a surname but a descriptive title (comparable to "of Spain" in "Charles II of Spain"; the "of Spain" isn't a surname), so it follows the name should not be partitioned. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 22:01, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

  First and foremost I don't understand why you don't accept my opposition to your deletion proposal, being on the verge of WP:bludgeon this process. Because of this, this will be my last comment in this conversation and I still opposing its deletion as the nominator has not provided a legitimate argument for the deletion.

  Spanish language has grammar rules and academias dictating how to use the language correctly, something the English-speaking world seriously needs. Here are the APA style rules for Spanish :

  When looking up the last name "de la Rosa" in a phone book, would you look under last names starting with "D" or "R"? Well, it depends on the country where you're looking for the phone number. If you're in the United States, where the APA style was developed, you should look under the letter "D". In Spain and Latin America, you'll most likely have to look under the letter "R". [...] The APA Publication Manual is very clear on this point and states that, in Spanish, prepositions in names are omitted for alphabetical sorting purposes. Thus, a last name such as "de la Rosa" would be sorted as if it were written "Rosa de la".

  "Tapia, Andrés de" is not incorrect. The nominator only wants it to be incorrect, and until all the Category:Redirects from sort names are deleted as useless, this is a legitimate redirect. Tbhotch^™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 22:23, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

  Bludgeoning? I replied to you twice (three times now). Continuing a conversation with 1 person in good faith is not bludgeoning.

  I would drop it here, except it's relevant for this process that you've actually persuaded me. I was not aware that the convention differed in Spanish. Per the info you linked, evidently my original rational was mistaken. I'm now also in favour of keeping the redirect. Though strictly speaking "de Tapia" isn't a surname (so wouldn't be partitioned according to Wikipedia's guidelines), not everyone can be expected to know that. With redirects there's more scope for leniency. If one were to apply the cited modern conventions retroactively to the name on the assumption that it were a surname, Tapia, Andres de is what you would get. Both de Tapia, Andres and Tapia, Andres de are plausible depending on which language/regional conventions you apply retroactively.

  Though I've changed my mind as the nominator, I am not withdrawing since other participants have argued to delete, only one of them "per nom", and I have no idea if they would be/are also persuaded. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 23:48, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per nom. J947 ‡ ^edits 00:23, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Kaikou

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

2021 Kharkiv mayoral election

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 October 1#2021 Kharkiv mayoral election

Ivo Hugh (person)

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

La Pulga

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

September 23

n-cubes

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Spear Odin

• Spear Odin → Gungnir  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

despite what thor would likely say of mjölnir, odin is not and has not fused or procreated with the spear. this is also otherwise grammatically fucked up, i guess (maybe the creator meant to create spear of odin?) consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 17:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

The fuck is being discussed? Do u want this redirect deleted? ᛒᛚᚮᚴᚴᚼᛆᛁ ᛭ 𝔅𝔩𝔬𝔠𝔨𝔥𝔞𝔧 21:53, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

redirect grammar no good

on an unrelated note, i've also created spear of odin to match hammer of thor consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 23:19, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. I don't see the issue here. Anyone who types "Spear Odin" is clearly looking for the article about Odin's spear. They haven't employed correct grammar, but there's no requirement that search terms be grammatically impeccable. Why not instead redirect them to a notice admonishing them for their improper grammar? (Also, not that it necessarily matters, but Hammer Thor does in fact exist.) – Michael Aurel (talk) 00:46, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
• weak keep. It only gets about 20 hits per year, so I'm not convinced it's super useful, but it is used at least sometimes, it's totally unambiguous, and we do also have hammer Thor→Mjölnir so it's not unprecedented. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 11:13, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as not a plausible search formulation. A random view every few weeks only shows that this either pops up when people are formulating searches, or that they get there from one of the links on someone's talk page (there are no incoming links from articles). P Aculeius (talk) 14:46, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep – unambiguous, harmless, gets actual usage. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 09:29, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: Does it get actual usage? Or do all of its clicks result from the fact that it exists? I can't imagine why anyone would search for "spear Odin" instead of "spear of Odin" if they didn't remember the name, and didn't think of looking under "Odin". And that didn't even exist until a week ago. It has a grand total of five hits, all in the two days after it was created, and none in the six since then (my view tonight would probably make six all time, but it's not on the chart). If it didn't occur to even one editor to make a redirect from "spear of Odin" until this discussion (nearly twenty years after the target article, Gungnir, was written), then there's simply no way that people have been searching for "spear Odin" in significant numbers.

The link is being clicked because it pops up in the search window when people are looking for something else, and people are curious about what it refers to. Likely when typing "spear of..." and accidentally hitting 'd' instead of 'f', because then "spear Odin" is the top result. And it gets clicked on once every two and a half weeks. An occasional typo isn't a valid reason for keeping it. It's simply not how people search on Wikipedia; note we don't have redirects for "Arc Triomphe", "Spear Destiny" (or "Sword Destiny"), and I'm not even going to bother searching for a redirect called "Lord the Rings". The only reason we have "Hammer Thor" is because the same person who created "Spear Odin" created it. P Aculeius (talk) 01:04, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. I think the improper grammar is too implausible to be useful. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:23, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 20:42, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Cherrylume

• Cherrylume → UE Lady Red Warriors volleyball  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The redirect previously targeted to Cherrylume Iron Lady Warriors before it became a redirect to UE Lady Red Warriors volleyball. Cherrylume was the sponsor company of the team, but without the initial article it was supposed to target, it has now become somewhat redundant. MarcusAbacus (talk) 07:42, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - this is kind of a weird one? I don't see that Cherrylume is discussed anywhere else on WP, but redirecting a company/brand name to a sports team is used to sponsor does not seem like it would be helpful to readers. I am seeing over 600 pageviews in the past 4 years, so maybe if it is a red link someone will create an article on Cherrylume. Or maybe not. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 14:25, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. There does seem to be sources calling the team simply Cherrylume , so someone searching for the team will find the redirect helpful. I've added a source to the target that specifies that Cherrylume is a manufacturer of roofing materials, so someone looking for the company will at least be able to get basic information on them. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:39, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts now that it is mentioned in the target?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 19:55, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

KDHT (defunct)

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Sulfates as a climate forcing

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy deleted

Weaponized artificial intelligence

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 6 § AI weapons – no consensus, retarget to Military applications of artificial intelligence

• Weaponized artificial intelligence → Ethics of artificial intelligence#Weaponization  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Weaponized AI → Lethal autonomous weapon  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• AI weapons → Military applications of artificial intelligence  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Should they all point to a same target? Jay 12:17, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Military applications of artificial intelligence: Agreed these are functionally synonymous and that seems like the closest match to what people are likely to be looking for. Rusalkii (talk) 15:14, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:36, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Trimethoprim sulfate

• Trimethoprim sulfate → Trimethoprim  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Sulfate is not mentioned at the target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 11:22, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Trimethoprim/polymyxin B. The salt of TMP is used in this combi-drug. NIH only list TMP sulfate products paired with Polymyxin B so this might be a good target. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:24, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep or retarget, per Miminity. Either target is ok for this plausible search term. If "sulfate" isn't mentioned in the target articles, that's a deficiency of the articles, not a problem with the redirect. Marbletan (talk) 12:15, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:48, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Metric-compatible

• Metric-compatible → Typeface#Font metrics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Metric compatible → Metric connection#Metric compatibility  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Metric compatibility → Metric connection#Metric compatibility  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

No longer any content in the target about this. We mention it briefly in a number of articles onwiki, with usage split between a math concept I am not going to try to understand the the typeface, but in all cases with the typeface it's a brief mention that doesn't seem to merit a redirect over search. Google hits seem likewise split. Retarget to the math concept (which article?) or delete? Rusalkii (talk) 21:03, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to metric connection, (aspects) of which can be or fail to be compatible with the bundle metric of that connection. Paradoctor (talk) 21:37, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Typeface anatomy#Font metrics where the concept is explained. Or disambiguation with metric connection as above. Blythwood (talk) 22:23, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 00:58, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: I’ve bundled metric compatible. Thepharoah17 (talk) 03:27, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
• Disambiguate at Metric compatibility (which should also have been bundled). Both targets seem niche, and my first thought was compatibility with the metric system; a common concern for tools and components. Width across flats, for example, discusses (in)compatbility between metric and imperial/US spanners/wrenches, including which sizes are close enough to be used interchangably. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 12:52, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:45, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

• Disambiguate per Scyrme. I have added Metric compatibility to the nomination. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 14:57, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

  • Disambiguate as per above. Sandstein 17:05, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

• Disambiguation draft requested Thepharoah17 (talk) 07:33, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Chizza

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 30#Chizza

Heylin Plant

• Heylin Plant → List of Xiaolin Showdown episodes#Season 2 (2004/05)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete readers will be surprised as there’s no information about this besides the fact that it’s in season 2 episode 20, leaving the reader surprised. Thepharoah17 (talk) 23:54, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep, there's more information than that at the target. Thought now that I think of it I suspect these descriptions of being copyvio, going to check that... Rusalkii (talk) 01:04, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

At least a preliminary check doesn't find anything except sources probably copying from us. Rusalkii (talk) 01:06, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 05:33, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 11:04, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

• delete per my comments on the previous rfd consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 19:16, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

ⅡKaras Region

• ⅡKaras Region → ǁKharas Region  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This one, I'm less certain about because the Roman numeral U+2161 Ⅱ ROMAN NUMERAL TWO is substituting for a lateral click (U+01C1 ǁ LATIN LETTER LATERAL CLICK). Still, pageviews are less than 0.1% of the target and about half of IIKaras Region with regular Latin II. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 09:27, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete as stated on the other RfD you put up today. | One Reaction was here. Got a complaint? 14:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC)
• Weak keep: it's very tempting to say delete per WP:MIXEDSCRIPT, but the lateral click isn't something most users will be able to type, and it is conceivable that they will select the wrong Unicode character in whatever interface they use to find the rare character. Then again anyone who is unfamiliar with the script is more likely to search for Karas Region (the former official name) anyway. Rosbif73 (talk) 16:26, 23 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment from creator of the redirect: There was quite some discussion on Talk:ǁKharas Region when the article was moved because the region was renamed. As I was arguing in favour of the move, I saw the creation of various redirects, illogical as they might be, as a condition to have the correct name for the article. --Pgallert (talk) 18:55, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Precomposed Roman numerals

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Ⅼeonardo Araújo

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Ivan Matvejev

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Refuse illegal orders

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

The Horrid Lorries

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

September 22

None of the above (political party)

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Elise Marilyn Jones

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Fifth tone

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Eighth tone

• Eighth tone → Equal temperament#Other equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Eighth-tone → Equal temperament#Other equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 48-TET → Equal temperament#Other equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at target nor at Varieties of equal temperament. 96 equal temperament contains this (sixteenth tone redirects there too), but 48-TET is only listed and eighth tones are not mentioned. The first of these could also refer to a linguistic tone such as at Pe̍h-ōe-jī#Tone markings. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:30, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Support. Although, I think deleting this would be preferable. Trumpetrep (talk) 23:12, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as an obscure neologism with no common usage among the languages with at least eight tones. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:30, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Seventh-tone

• Seventh-tone → Equal temperament#Other equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A seventh tone would exist in 42-tone equal temperament, which we do not seem to have content on. There is also a seventh tone in languages such as Pe̍h-ōe-jī#Tone markings, but that would be spelt without a hyphen. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:18, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Support. Thank you for nominating these. Trumpetrep (talk) 23:13, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as an obscure neologism. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:30, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

27 equal temperament

• 27 equal temperament → Equal temperament#Various equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 27-tone equal temperament → Equal temperament#Various equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 27 tone equal temperament → Equal temperament#Various equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 46 equal temperament → Equal temperament#Various equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 46-TET → Equal temperament#Various equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 47 equal temperament → Equal temperament#Proportions between semitone and whole tone  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 16 equal temperament → Equal temperament#Various equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 16-TET → Equal temperament#Various equal temperaments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Temperaments not mentioned at the target, nor at the Varieties of equal temperament which lists various other temperaments. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:08, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete I think this was removed during cleanup of uncited WP:OR and indiscriminate tables at this article and the other one by Trumpetrep (talk · contribs) and myself in June–July 2026. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:16, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

LaundryPizza03, noting that I added two more that I had somehow overlooked. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:38, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. It would be a great improvement to remove this content from Wikipedia and deal it with it succinctly in one place. Trumpetrep (talk) 23:14, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment : 27 tone equal temperament, 46 equal temperament, and 16 equal temperament have incoming links, at which they are mentioned at least in passing. Not familiar enough with the topic to have an opinion on whether these are reasonable redirect targets. Rusalkii (talk) 04:40, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Jukude language

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 30#Jukude language

Elon Musk's submarine

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 30#Elon Musk's submarine

They hit the pentagon

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 30#They hit the pentagon

SuMo

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 30#SuMo

Joe Kerr

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 30#Joe Kerr

Christina Gagnier

• Christina Gagnier → 2026 United States House of Representatives elections in California (districts 27–52)#District 40  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Political candidate who ran in but withdrew from the target election. Previously ran in 2014_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_California#District_35. The 2014 election is probably a more primary topic since she actually received votes in it but I think readers would be better off with just the search results. मल्ल (talk) 16:02, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

I would 100% agree to Delete for having withdrawn in 2026. With that being said, there is an argument for going back to 2014 and I would Support that. She was a notable candidate in that race, after all, and advanced to the general election. PickleG13 (talk) 21:57, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Non-notable political candidates who have run multiple times should be redirected to their most recent campaign. The 2026 election notes her 2014 run, but the 2014 election does not note her 2026 run (and it would be anachronistic to do so). -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:23, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Ralstonite

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Arthur Dixon (American Politician)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 30#Arthur Dixon (American Politician)

Perfect Kind of Us

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 October 1#Perfect Kind of Us

Pretty Girls "Say Hi"

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

Hot Bros "Say Hi"

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

Butu language (Central African Republic)

• Butu language (Central African Republic) → Naba language  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don't see any evidence that there is a language called "Butu" in the Central African Republic. Searching Ethnologue reveals that there is a language called "Butu", but it corresponds to the Gamo-Ningi language, which is in Nigeria, not CAR. Trying the Joshua Project or Glottolog reveals no matches. So I suggest deletion. Duckmather (talk) 04:16, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

That would leave a red link at the V&V page that identifies the languages in that source, which was the basis for Ethnologue. It would just have to be recreated. — kwami (talk) 04:37, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

In that case, why not retarget to Gamo-Ningi language (as Ethnologue suggests) instead? Duckmather (talk) 20:06, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:57, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, unmentioned, no evidence of existence. "That would leave a red link at the V&V page that identifies the languages in that source, which was the basis for Ethnologue. It would just have to be recreated." makes absolutely no sense. No, it wouldn't have to be recreated. A red link in project space is no reason to maintain a bad redirect in main space. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:34, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Evidence of existence has been provided through Ethnologue. The unmentioned problem could just as easily be resolved with an addition to the target article. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:43, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

I have added the mention. Duckmather (talk) 21:21, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

But it also doesn't resolve the problem that the Central African Republic isn't mentioned, so unless one of y'all can get a copy of Voegelin and Voegelin (1977) and cite that, I still think this redirect is worth deletion because of the wrong-country problem. Duckmather (talk) 21:38, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Oh, I glanced over the fact that they were different countries. I'm good with delete then. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:38, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

I don't know which is the V&V page kwami (the creator) is talking about, but per what Deacon says, it seems to be a page in project space, and I agree that a redlink in project space is not a concern for mainspace. I also agree with nom that the concern with CAR has not been resolved with the added mention. Jay 15:02, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Trump TV

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

A.M.P.

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 29#A.M.P.

5'9"

• 5'9" → Royce da 5'9"  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Yes, his stage name is Royce da 5'9". However, there is no indication that he goes by just "5'9"". Vague and unhelpful, and I don't think we should endorse cutting off 66% off of a stage name to create a redirect. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 14:51, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to 5 Foot 9? -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:08, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. Since he does occasionally refer to himself as 5'9", then this is a plausible redirect for someone to search. -- Tavix ^(talk) 13:31, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete or retarget. He does occasionally refer to himself as "5'9"" (or related nicknames like "Nickel Nine") in his lyrics, but not prominently enough that someone would plausibly be searching for Royce by entering "5'9"" alone. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 13:22, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
• retarget per Tavix --Lenticel ^(talk) 12:35, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Are the self references enough to keep this redirect over retargeting to 5 Foot 9?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Skarmory (talk • contribs) 13:52, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

List Of Levels In WarioWare: Smooth Moves

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Fire suppression agent FS 49 C2®

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

50 State Quarters® Program

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Gemstone ridge

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Five Nights at Freddy's: Survival Crew

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Top 10 Most Visited Roblox Experiences

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Card-en-Ciel

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 30#Card-en-Ciel

We Are for the Wild Places

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Wrong venue

Benny Yahu

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Not on yahoo

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Western media bias

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

The Engine Inspector

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

September 21

Krung Thep Maha Nakhon Amon Rattanakosin Mahinthara Ayutthaya Mahadilok Phop Noppharat Ratchathani Burirom Udomratchaniwet Mahasathan Amon Phiman Awatan Sathit Sakkathattiya Witsanukam Prasit Bravo A.F.C.

• Krung Thep Maha Nakhon Amon Rattanakosin Mahinthara Ayutthaya Mahadilok Phop Noppharat Ratchathani Burirom Udomratchaniwet Mahasathan Amon Phiman Awatan Sathit Sakkathattiya Witsanukam Prasit Bravo A.F.C. → Bangkok F.C.  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Clearly implausible misnomer for a football club (substituting "Bangkok" with the city's ceremonial name). — RAVENPVFF · talk · 22:41, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. No links in article space, not mentioned in the target article, zero Google hits other than this redirect and, very obviously, nobody is ever going to type all that into the search box. My first thought was that it was made by somebody taking the piss but a quick look at their other contributions suggests otherwise. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:27, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  let's try getting info from the source~

  @Dancing Hippos so, what's the origin of this name? consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 12:10, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

  I looked into the article history and when it was first added by Dancing Hippos back in 2023, it was described as a publicity stunt. The claim needs a citation, but even if verified, I don't think the stunt name would be appropriate for a redirect anyway. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:54, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Implausible search term. मल्ल (talk) 04:13, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. BDD (talk) 14:54, 23 September 2026 (UTC)
• Just notified of this discussion at the target talk. Jay 02:00, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Becky Lonergan

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Te Iringa Marae

• Te Iringa Marae → Kaikohe  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There are two marae with this name, this could be a dab page but with only two topics, neither of which have more than a sentence I'm unsure how helpful it'd be. Traumnovelle (talk) 20:18, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Te Iringa

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Southern Virgin Islands

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Roller sports at the 2026 Asian Games

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Northern Virgin Islands

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Camille, Louisiana

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 30#Camille, Louisiana

Mozilla Deer Park

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Bibi the Butcher

• Bibi the Butcher → Benjamin Netanyahu  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unestablished pejorative epithet for a living person. Delete Pascuet (talk) 17:40, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• I've seen it used on social media, but that's self-research. The nickname is used in some opinion pieces when you Google it, so Keep (The National Line) (The Salt Lake Tribune]) Pinoccappuccino (talk) 17:52, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, this is libel. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 18:13, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  It is not libel; libel is a deliberate or negligent publishing of something false. This epithet is an opinion, which people are allowed to have. Our only question is if this is a possible search term. 331dot (talk) 19:13, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. It's not libel, but we also shouldn't have it if it's not mentioned at the target, per the usual arguments. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 19:15, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep as Bibi is mentioned as his nickname in the lead. The term doesn't need to be included verbatim if it is obvious why it redirects there. plenty of uses of the term and it cannot refer to anyone else. I cannot see a scenario of someone searching this and being confused as to why they ended up where they did. I am not against revisiting this in a few months if pageviews show that this redirect isn't being used. Traumnovelle (talk) 21:40, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep as {{r from pejorative}}. As Pinoccappuccino notes, it has appeared in the news and on social media so I see no reason to think it wouldn't be plausible, especially as "butcher" is also a very common pejorative with a long and well-established history of use for politicians and officials. Finding examples of such redirects on Wikipedia is trivial (eg. Jamal the Butcher, The Butcher of Beijing, Butcher of Bengal). It's unambiguous and I agree with Traumnovelle that this would not be a surprising target; also not against leaving this open for renomination in a few months if the traffic shows no discernable usage. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 13:52, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: Unambiguous, obvious from the first sentence that it refers to him as "Bibi" is in the first sentence, has enough usage that people will plausibly be looking it up, and per Scyrme the article + common knowledge of "butcher" as a nickname is enough to figure out why someone would call him that. WP:RNEUTRAL does not require us to delete even very biased names. Rusalkii (talk) 22:16, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Violates WP:NPOV and WP:NEUTRALTITLE. Does not serve as a standard, objective search alternative to the primary article. —Biosketch (talk) 04:15, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

  It does not violate those policies because this is a redirect not an article title. Non-neutral redirects are permissible, and there are hundreds of them. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 18:17, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Redirects don't have to be neutral or inoffensive, and "not mentioned at the target" is really a proxy for "will a user be surprised to wind up here?", which I'm pretty sure they won't. --Trovatore (talk) 19:56, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Butcher of Gaza

• Butcher of Gaza → Benjamin Netanyahu  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unestablished pejorative epithet for a living person. Delete Pascuet (talk) 17:40, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, potentially libelous. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 17:42, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. Used by the President of Türkiye on national television. (Middle East Eye) (Reuters) Pinoccappuccino (talk) 17:48, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. "Libelous" isn't so much a concern, but being unmentioned is, as in the previous nomination. That it was used by someone doesn't matter; there has to be something in the target about it. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 19:16, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
  • There doesn't really have to be something at the target about it. This is a closer call than "Bibi the Butcher", though; it's not clear that it's unambiguous. --Trovatore (talk) 20:00, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Butcher (nickname) this also refers to Antony Blinken and probably others. Its not unambiguous to be a good non-neutral redirect to an individual. Blinken should be mentioned at the target if this is closed as retarget. Traumnovelle (talk) 21:37, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Butcher (nickname) LincolnMagnus (talk) 02:25, 23 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Violates WP:NPOV and WP:NEUTRALTITLE. Does not serve as a standard, objective search alternative to the primary article. —Biosketch (talk) 04:15, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

  This is misinformed as those P&Gs don't apply to redirects; the relevant guidelines are WP:RNEUTRAL. See also Category:Redirects from non-neutral names. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 18:22, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: Biosketch has removed Netanyahu (Butcher of Gaza) and Erdoğan (Butcher of Ankara) from Butcher (nickname) with the rationale: removing living figures per WP:BLP, WP:LABEL. WP:WEIGHT. News coverage of political barbs and partisan rhetoric does not make a pejorative epithet an encyclopedic moniker. Unless this is reverted, it is not longer a suitable target for proposals to retarget. (For clarity, I am not arguing that it should be reverted; I'm only stating there is no longer a mention there to retarget to.) – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 18:29, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Mozilla Firefox's

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Matthew John Stewart

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Honghe railway station

• Honghe railway station → Mile–Mengzi high-speed railway  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Requested action: deletion. For some reason, the (uncreated) article of this railway station redirects to the article of the railway it is on. This is misleading and useless. SpectralIon 01:01, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep as mentioned at target and an {{R from subtopic}} or {{R to related topic}}, without prejudice to creation as an article if it is notable. Also add a {{Redirect}} hatnote for Honghe station, a metro station in Chengdu, and a {{Distinguish}} hatnote vice versa. Fork99 (talk) 01:07, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

  My main issue with Honghe being redirected is that 1. No other Chinese high-speed rail station articles (that I have discovered) are redirects to the railway they are on and 2. Many Chinese high-speed rail stations, even for small areas like Honghe, are independent articles. If there was a precedent for this, I would be fine with it. SpectralIon 20:36, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

  This sounds like an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument. I've found Wulongquan East railway station and Xinzheng East railway station which redirect to Beijing–Guangzhou high-speed railway, although these are the result of a WP:BLAR (blank and redirect), whereas Honghe railway station has always been a redirect. As someone familiar with Australian railway stations, there are hundreds of similar redirects to their respective railway lines or to the town they are in, I don't know about globally though. Fork99 (talk) 23:19, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:52, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 00:03, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep - per Fork99. Wheatley2 (speak to me) (watch me) 02:19, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per Fork99. The WP:RCIRCULAR link at the target should be evaluated. It should probably be removed unless this is an {{R with possibilities}}, although if that is the case then maybe this should in fact be deleted per WP:RETURNTORED. But per the current situation, keeping this redirect is reasonable. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 00:09, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Railway stations are generally notable, and this redirect actively discourages article creation. The target mentions it, but only briefly: in an image caption and the fact that the line terminates there. Better to delete the article. Nyttend (talk) 19:34, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:RETURNTORED. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:00, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. The last 3 !votes make an argument that this should be deleted to encourage article creation, and so far these arguments have not been rebutted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 16:31, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Nostalgia bait

• Nostalgia bait → 2026 is the new 2016  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. Search engine results indicate the term is not exclusively connected with the 2026 phenomenon. ~ A412 ^talk! 16:56, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom, this could apply to nostalgia for any year from any time. Shocksingularity (talk) 23:36, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Notecardforfree (talk) 08:54, 26 August 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to Glossary of 2020s slang#N I added a preliminary entry to the glossary, which could be expanded later. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 09:05, 26 August 2026 (UTC)
• Retarget to Glossary of 2020s slang#N (or create an anchor and retarget to that) per Miminity. The definition of a slightly different form of the term has been given there, and this redirect could help readers find it. Chess enjoyer (talk) 05:26, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:36, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Nostalgia#As an advertising tool, which is more pertinent than the glossary entry. Add some mention of the term "nostalgia bait" therein. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:12, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

  I'd be fine with this if a mention gets added. Chess enjoyer (talk) 23:42, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the newly suggested target?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 21:20, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Retarget to Nostalgia#As an advertising tool per zxcvbnm; seems more pertinent than the glossary entry, which is too short to adequately explain the context. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 22:46, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

I second this. Moonliner72 (talk) 22:03, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is anyone willing to add a mention to Nostalgia#As an advertising tool?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:23, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to Glossary of 2020s slang#N, where the term is explained, at least in the short term. I think this serves readers better than retargeting to an article purely about advertising, particularly as the term is not even mentioned there. This is not specifically about advertising, although that is a part of it. In the longer term I think that there is maybe a 50% change that we will eventually have a valid article specifically about nostalgia bait (as a phenomenon) or nostalgia baiting (as a practice) in the future. If we let the glossary entry expand as required then it will become clear if and when that should happen. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:07, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Altynbekova Sabina

• Altynbekova Sabina → Kazakhstan women's national volleyball team#Junior  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Sabina Altynbekova → 2018 VTV9 – Binh Dien International Women's Volleyball Cup#Awards  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the first target, nor should it be. Sum total of the text at the second target is an unsourced "Miss Volleyball" and a readymade salt-evading redlink. Any suggestion - let alone a completely unreasoned one, as at the previous rfd - that the latter is in any manner appropriate should be read in the context of the very contentious Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabina Altynbekova. Trivial passing mentions in three other articles. None of the five are in the least suitable as a redirect target from this title. Delete to let search take over. —Cryptic 21:09, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect - Redirect both to 2018 VTV9 – Binh Dien International Women's Volleyball Cup#Awards, as the listing is now sourced. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:54, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
  • To one source that doesn't mention the award at all, and another that has less than a sentence about it. Which is beside the point, since you still haven't given any reason why this target is better than any of the other trivial mentions - the search prompted by a redlink would show them all. —Cryptic 00:04, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

    Sabina's win is SOURCED. The redirect was discussed very recently, and was ruled upon as retarget, so this instead of a deletion review, is kind of an abuse of process. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:11, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

    (At least) one of the other trivial factlets is also sourced, and all three are less demeaning, and no more or less appropriate as a target. Deletion review would never in a thousand years endorse the previous rfd, between your entirely unmotivated bare vote - and you have still given no reason to redirect to this target - and the improper non-admin closure, but if you insist we can take it there and leave this dismissive redirect in limbo for another month or so after it inevitably sends it back here. —Cryptic 15:00, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

    I am OK with deletion review. The actual retarget itself was performed by an administrator, which demonstrated that two people did not disagree with the retarget. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:40, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:22, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Sabarmati Junction (SBT) railway station

• Sabarmati Junction (SBT) railway station → Sabarmati Junction railway station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is a procedural nomination of behalf of ROLEXMEENA who attempted to RfD this in July but did not edit the daily RfD log. ROLEXMEENA created this as a self-reverted {{R from move}}, see Special:Diff/1363953523. Note that they're blocked for sockpuppetry, but this account is the sockmaster so WP:G5 doesn't apply. Maybe WP:G7, but it's unclear what they wanted. I know G7 isn't usually applied to page moves if the mover wasn't the only contributor to all pages, but this was a self-reverted move over redirect that lasted 18 minutes.

"SBT" is mentioned in the article for what it's worth, so seems plausible. So I don't think WP:G6 applies nor is this recently created for WP:R3. Fork99 (talk) 13:11, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep as plausible and harmless per nom. SBT is mentioned in and without brackets for the station at the target. Jay 15:21, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:21, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Rudy Holiday

• Rudy (Deltarune) → List of Undertale and Deltarune characters#Rudy Holiday  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Rudolph Holiday → List of Undertale and Deltarune characters#Rudy Holiday  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Rudy Holiday → List of Undertale and Deltarune characters#Rudy Holiday  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Redirects of a fictional character not mentioned at target. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 05:12, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment He is an actual character in the game, but he is most likely unmentioned in that list because he was deemed not significant enough Mr slav999 (talk) 18:06, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Yes, but he never had a section to begin with. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 18:32, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget all to List of fictional ungulates#Video games (or create an anchor and retarget to that), where he has an entry. Chess enjoyer (talk) 22:38, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:20, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: What do you think of my retarget suggestion, @Organhaver? Chess enjoyer (talk) 21:41, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  I'm more neutral on it. There's no citations in the entry (although unsure if that is even needed) and it's only one very short sentence (but regardless better than the current target). Thank you for asking. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 22:28, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

This Tweet violated the Twitter Rules.

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

2-valued morphism

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Multiple variations of Trans Sahara slave trade

• Trans Sahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Trans sahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sub-Sahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sub-Sahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• SubSahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sub-sahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Subsahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Transsahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Trans-sahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Trans-Sahara slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Transsaharan slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• TransSaharan slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Subsaharan slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• SubSaharan slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sub-saharan slave trade → Trans-Saharan slave trade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Dozens of redirects with minor spelling differences by blocked user. See other mass redirect discussions at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 9#Eu Commission v Hungary. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 14:27, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

as a heads-up, massxfd can make the process of nomming multiple redirects at once a little easier, and avoid cluttering talk pages consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 14:37, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep most, as despite being made by a blocked editor a lot of these are uncontroversially reasonable spelling variations. It's trivial to find variation in hyphenation between "trans-saharan"/"sub-subsaharan" and "transsaharan"/"subsaharan" on Scholar and Google Books; redirects where this is the only difference are fine and are useful for both searches and internal linking. Variation between "Saharan" and "Sahara" also seems generally fine; eg. "trans-saharan slave trade" and "trans-sahara slave trade" both yield results on Google Books. Searching for "[the] Sahara slave trade" shows that the unprefixed "Sahara" is also plausible variation.

Delete redirects where the hyphen is replaced by a space, as I don't see much evidence that this is common in my external search results and this isn't conventional for English in general. Seems more like an SEO technique than plausible language.

Delete redirects which capitalise Sahara mid-word without a hyphen ("transSaharan", "subSaharan"). These are entirely unnecessary for searching (the search engine ignores case whenever possible and will redirect you even if no explicit redirect exists; try a search for TraNs-SaHaRan sLave trAde) and are worse than useless for linking as they're incorrect but appear in blue, making unintended use easier. I strongly suspect these titles reflect how sometimes hyphens get omitted in, eg, previews extracted from pages on Google Books, even when they're present on the actual page itself. This is something a machine would do. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 15:24, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete all relating to "Sub Saharan" (too lazy to list all, just spent a lot of time writing elsewhere): there were multiple slave trades south of the Sahara desert which could be discussed, including (arguably) the Atlantic Slave Trade, so the use of that namespace specifically for the one slave trade noted for crossing the Sahara satisfies confusion under WP:RDELETE.. HiddenHistoryPedia (talk) 14:41, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Temporal clause

• Temporal clause → Temporal clause (Latin)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I assume the undisambiguated phrase should just point at Adverbial clause. Not sure why that article does not mention the "technical" Latin-derived terms though. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:17, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: There's a currently open RM that may end up moving the destination article. I don't currently anticipate that the RM result is likely to have any direct effect on this redirect, but it's probably worth noting regardless. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 13:33, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I notified the RM
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 13:35, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Boobies (breasts)

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Reference library/Playstation 2 Offical Magazine - UK

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Physical map

• Physical map → Map#Map types and projections  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Ambiguous term. I thought of a paper map, incoming links are split between the genomics meaning and the cartographical meaning (a map of the physical territory rather than political borders). Delete or disambig? There's a dab page in the history. See also Political map, which I am not bundling but which is similarly fuzzy. Rusalkii (talk) 22:42, 26 August 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget - I'm pretty familiar with map terminology, because I just re-wrote the map article (GA, now going thru FAC). The term "physical map" is very rarely used, so it certainly does not deserve an article. Many important sources do not mention it at all:

• The Glossary of the Mapping Sciences published by American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing - has no mention of "physical map"
• The ESRI GIS dictionary - has no mention of "physical map"

So what does (did) the term "physical map" designate? The History of Cartography (vol 6 "20th century") does mention it twice on page 107, where it has "...a gradual shift of emphasis from the general political and physical maps to topical maps including more demographic and environmental themes ...". See also p 51. It is clear from the usage in this source that a physical map focuses on topography and the physical surface of the earth, rather than man-made features, particularly political boundaries. Google, FWIW, agrees with that assessment. The modern term for a map that focuses on the physical features is topographic map.

Therefore, the best thing to do is to redirect physical map to topographic map. Noleander (talk) 00:00, 27 August 2026 (UTC)

• From 2003–2012 this was a dab page (link). J947 ‡ ^edits 04:12, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 07:36, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 00:45, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Not sure. Noleander's analysis does a good job of analysing solid sources, but when we're talking redirects, we also have to support casual usage that can't be documented, and I suspect that in that setting, "physical map" is used in contrast to electronic mapping, comparable to "snail mail" versus e-mail. (If anyone would study such terminology, it would likely be folklorists and linguists, not cartographers.) Most people will be aware of the existence of topographic maps, but most people will probably not expect this redirect to refer to them. I say "not sure" only because I don't know where we'd cover this sense; Electronic map redirects to Map. Nyttend (talk) 19:42, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 ‡ ^edits 11:59, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Ben Small (actor)

• Ben Small (actor) → List of Thomas & Friends voice actors#Cast  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

An actor should not redirect to one role out of many. Either should be an article or a redlink if one can be written, or unlinked if not. Fram (talk) 10:41, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: this was BLARed in January by a TA due a lack of RSes (certainly true of the article as it stood, haven't checked for notability). Rusalkii (talk) 22:29, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Restore. He has plenty of credits, so I'm afraid he is probably notable. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:26, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Gentlemen of Railway Board

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Medieval repair

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

I am Adolf Hitler!

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 October 1#I am Adolf Hitler!

Cities' alternative names

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

English city names

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 30#English city names

Weenie

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: procedural close

History of Chinese Revolution

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy close, retargeted by author to Chinese Revolution

Minefield (trunk build)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 30#Minefield (trunk build)

Chris Ahuja

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 30#Chris Ahuja

Jonathan Wagoner

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Malder

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Jim Shoemaker

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Sally Ride Space Telescope

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Ify

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

September 19

Felix Felicis

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Brazil I'm devastated

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Tiger cat

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Internet distribution system

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Internet industry

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 30#Internet industry

Cyberservices

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 30#Cyberservices

Vertical online service

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Video commerce

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Serbia and Montenegro men's national under-19 basketball team

• Serbia and Montenegro men's national under-19 basketball team → Yugoslavia men's national under-19 basketball team  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I would like to delete this redirect. Serbia and Montenegro, including its former name FR Yugoslavia, have never played any under-19 basketball tournament. Maiō T. (talk) 14:30, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

• This is more of a content issue, than a redirect issue. The target article does mention this team. Also, I just notified of this discussion at the target and creator talk pages. Jay 17:22, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. The mention at the #New national teams section looks like general information about the countries, not their youth basketball teams. --BDD (talk) 15:25, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I had closed this discussion as delete, but I am instead relisting following a request on my talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:56, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Noting the comment on Tavix's talk page from Jay (talk · contribs): "All the links at the #New national teams section are for the under-19 teams, and that includes Serbia and Montenegro whose under-19 team is a redlink now." That's accurate for the bulleted list at that section. I should have been more specific: I was referring to the prose before that list, which indeed links to general country names, not sports teams of any sort. So I agree with his earlier comment that this is a content issue. My conclusion is still delete, though. Unanswered is the question of whether the country of Serbia and Montenegro ever had such a team. If it did, delete per WP:REDLINK. If it didn't, delete because it never existed. --BDD (talk) 20:29, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

  If it existed, which the target says it did, from 1992 to 2006, does it deserve an article, or is this redirect sufficient? If it didn't exist, and the target is wrong, the entry needs to be removed from the target, and this redirect deleted. However, there is an incoming link from FIBA Europe and I tried hard, but couldn't find where it is linked in that article. Jay 08:15, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:REDLINK. Serbia and Montenegro separated in 2006. Just one year later, Serbia hosted (and won!) the 2007 FIBA Under-19 World Championship. I think it's safe to say this team existed, brand new teams don't get to host and win major tournaments like that. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:37, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Runescape quest list

• Runescape quest list → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescape quests → RuneScape#Quests  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescape clan → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• RuneScape Videos → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runescape currency → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Runehq → RuneScape#Community  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• The Red Axe (Consortium) → RuneScape  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I would like to delete these various RuneScape topics better found outside of Wikipedia. Quests are mentioned, and currency in relation to real-world trading. A few of those pages were originally created in attempts to write about RuneScape quests and currency, which is why I'm not keen on keeping them. The Red Axe started as some sort of joke page. Here for the one billionth edit (talk) 10:11, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete most. The Red Axe (Consortium) would fall under WP:CSD#G3 as a hoax/joke article and should've been tagged for speedy deletion not blanked and redirected. No reason not to delete.

A few others here also at some time had attempts at (non-hoax) articles, but these were all blanked and redirected so there's no merge history to worry about here. It's safe to delete all these.

However, I would say keep/refine Runescape quests to RuneScape § Gameplay, since this topic is still discussed there. No reason not to assist readers in finding content Wikipedia does have coverage for. (But delete the "list" redirect, as there is no list.) Delete all the rest due to lack of coverage to redirect to.

I did consider if Runescape currency could be kept as it is mentioned in RuneScape, but there's nothing substantial and the relevant content concerns other topics such as monetisation (via RuneCoins, one of several currencies) and anti-cheating policies. Readers looking for info specifically about the currencies themselves would not find what they're looking for, so the redirect isn't helpful. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 18:46, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete all Perhaps they may have had some use in a bygone era where search was bad. Nowadays they are redundant and unnecessary, as search is robust enough to handle things like this. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:16, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  Are there other search results that are relevant? If not, deleting Runescape quests is just wasting the reader's time and adding unnecessary friction to navigating Wikipedia. There's no reason to throw out a perfectly fine redirect just because it's bundled with bad ones. Under normal circumstances, nominated by itself it would undoubtedly be kept as the topic is mentioned and redirects are cheap. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 21:41, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Weak keep Runescape quests per Scryme. Delete the rest. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:47, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep Runescape quests and Runescape currency as they are mentioned at the article. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:21, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:43, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Sen's Fortress

• Sen's Fortress → Dark Souls (video game)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

only mentioned in passing, in a sentence that a reader who hasn't played dark souls (me!) wouldn't even notice the absence of. the pre-blar content was fancruft, with only 1.2 reliable sources (pc gamer and kotaku) actually about the damn place, with the rest being irrelevant and/or user-generated. i found maybe one or two usable sources, but i doubt they'd be enough to even warrant a mention in the article due to their nature. will be listing them soon regardless

coincidentally, most info on it was removed from the target shortly after the blar, but i couldn't find any evidence of a merge, so there's nothing to lose here consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 19:40, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

sauce

• shacknews: top however much list of which sen's fortress is an entry
• gamespot: what the hell are they doing here lmao. early impressions of the place
• pcgamesn: is a coverage-shaped let's play fair game here? i wouldn't say so, but i'll dump this anyway

that's... actually everything noteworthy that i could find consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 19:52, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep First of all, there is more SIGCOV than that. The article used a section from "You Died", which is a third-party book published by Tune & Fairweather analyzing Dark Souls. It's reliable significant coverage. The level is also featured in Dark Souls: Beyond the Grave, another third-party published reliable source. It's arguably standalone notable, and never went through an AfD process, just one user's personal opinion; I had just not bothered to continue expanding it. There's at least enough to talk about in the game article, and IMO the redirect was done without Wikiquette and without even asking me what the sources were. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:24, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chess enjoyer (talk) 05:41, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:21, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• @Zxcvbnm: Are you willing to work on the article further to address notability/sourcing concerns? If so, it would probably be fine to revert the BLAR and draftify. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 12:31, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  That's fine by me, I can add any additional sources and put it back into mainspace. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:27, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:42, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. There's currently a mention, as well as a promise for more. That's good enough for me. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:59, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

College stort

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Sadist (band) songs

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

None of the above (political party)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 22#None of the above (political party)

Window Server 2003

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Deltarune quote redirects

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 26#Deltarune quote redirects

Lightner/Darkner redirects

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Frown line

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Consortium Book Sales & Distribution

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 30#Consortium Book Sales & Distribution

Oliver the excavator

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

CamelCase

• Wikipedia:CAMELCASE → Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks#General rules  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• MOS:CAMELCASE → Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks#CAMELCASE  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

WP:CAMELCASE redirects to the top of a section, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks#General rules, whereas MOS:CAMELCASE redirects to an anchor in that section, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks#CAMELCASE. These ought to be consistent. I would say they should both go to the anchor since that's where use of CamelCase is actually discussed. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:58, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget the first one to the anchor (#CAMELCASE) per nom and Keep for the second one. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 05:04, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
• Disambiguate the 1st as Wikipedia:CamelCase and Wikipedia might be more likely (and what I would expect) and keep 2nd as this deals with CamelCase as opposed to other things like capitalization. In the MOS so it probably isn't ambiguous with the project page but as 2nd choice retarget the 2nd to the same target as the 1st for the same reason. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:54, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

  A hatnote would be better than disambiguating two pages. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:14, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose disambiguation. The vast majority of projectspace shortcuts are ambiguous; it rarely makes sense to dabify them because that functionally makes them useless. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 04:54, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

  @Godsy: any opinion on where they should both target? voorts (talk/contributions) 22:35, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  @Voorts: Not strongly, no. If left to my own devices, I would retarget WP:CAMELCASE to Wikipedia:CamelCase and Wikipedia; my only personal point of reference with the term comes from the on-wiki historical subject. That aside, I do prefer where it currently targets (as opposed to a sending it to the mos anchor) because that directs to the hatnote containing the information I would be seeking if typing it in the search box (and seemingly serves as a best of both worlds approach). MOS:CAMELCASE seems fine as it is; 'MOS' differentiates it well enough in my humble opinion. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 11:19, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 04:53, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Retarget per @Miminity. | One Reaction was here. Got a complaint? 14:10, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Lists of school districts

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Listify

Sakai Prefecture

• Sakai Prefecture → Sakai  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sakai prefecture → Sakai  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Created with an edit summary of "alt name" but Sakai was never a prefecture, and no mention in the target page. The redirect seems to have been created by mistake. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 13:50, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. If it was never a prefecture then this is actively misleading and should be deleted. --DanielRigal (talk) 14:38, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

  No objection to the deletion of the redirect. Only for the record/if someone wants to replace the redirect with a proper article, Sakai was a prefecture (-ken), and was actually the most long-lived (or least short-lived) among no longer existing restoration-era prefectures: It existed from 1868 to 1881 (see ja:堺県 or Sakai Prefecture in the NICT Japanese Wiki Corpus; also for the Edo period/loose precursor, cf. Sakai bugyō, but any continuity is less direct than in other cases; unlike some other bugyō successors such as Yamada bugyō/Watarai-fu or Nagasaki bugyō/Nagasaki-fu, it was also never set up as a -fu, but was Sakai-ken from the beginning), at its peak it extended to roughly the Southern half of present-day Osaka and all of Nara until it was merged into Osaka in 1881. But the redirect to Sakai City is indeed off; cities of Japan didn't even exist as such before 1889 (their precursor -ku did, though, since 1878; Sakai-ku was initially part of Sakai-ken until the merger into Osaka). --Asakura Akira (talk) 15:48, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

• As stated above, Sakai was a prefecture in the late 1800s. That status is also mentioned in the target article, so this seems to me like a keep until Sakai Prefecture is expanded into an article. Dekimasuよ! 03:30, 23 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Since the city and the prefecture do not appear to have been coterminous, I think this is better left as a redlink. A redirect could be misleading readers to conclude the prefecture and the city were one and the same. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:38, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

• That would apply to much of the article, though. Sakai#Feudal period and Sakai#Edo period also deal with entities that are geographically and culturally intertwined but not coterminous with the modern city. Since the article is already at the plain title, I don't think it is a problem for Sakai Prefecture to redirect here, as Sakai City does. Dekimasuよ! 08:50, 26 August 2026 (UTC)

  I'm assuming you are referring to the mentions of other cities in those sections, in which case, that does not seem equivalent to me. The main topic of those sections is clearly the existing city, not a surrounding broader region. (It wouldn't make sense to redirect Hyōgo to Sakai#Edo period just because it is mentioned there, for example). The mention of the prefecture at Sakai#Modern period says that the prefecture included parts of present-day Osaka and Nara Prefectures, so I still think a redlink is best here. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:19, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 23:06, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 00:30, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep without prejudice to renomination if content is removed. Whether the page should mention the prefecture or not is an editorial decision for the page in question, not RFD. As long as there is mention the redirect is useful. An anchor might me helpful here or section targetting too. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:45, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 03:06, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep, but refine to Sakai#Modern Saki. The redirect aids readers in locating information about the past prefecture. No benefit would be gained from deleting this redirect. Katzrockso (talk) 13:31, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Refine to Sakai#Modern Sakai as there is information at the target that could be useful to readers. Can be marked as {{R with possibilities}} to show that there is potential to turn this into an article. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 20:32, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Morys

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: disambiguate

Time location

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

• Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 27 § Time location – retarget to Instant

• Time location → Instant  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

like the previous rfd, but a fucked up evil version of it where i'll instead suggest deleting as vague per differing definitions of both words in the oddly specific context of this term (with results being primarily mid-sentence, referring to "real-time location sharing" or the time, location, and additional traits of assorted stuff) consarn _{(talk beige) (count ribs)} 19:55, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Two distinct words not used together. I don't understand the argument from the previous RfD. As an ATD, I would prefer Time zone, also suggested at the previous RfD. Jay 09:08, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 00:07, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 03:05, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, horribly vague. My first thought was Spacetime diagram. When everyone has to struggle so hard to come up with a possible meaning, and no one comes up with the same one, that's a good sign it's a bad redirect. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 05:57, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
• Pinging participants of previous RfD; @J947 @Scyrme @Hey man im josh @Pppery @Bassie f Katzrockso (talk) 13:17, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep contra Deacon Vorbis because I rather strongly disagree with their sign that it's a bad redirect. There did not seem to be a struggle in the previous discussion and I think Scyrme explained it quite well. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:30, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. The current target does not describe anything that relates to a location or place. What would someone even be looking for? Perhaps a location called "Time", two of which are mentioned at Time (disambiguation)#Places? I would think the most likely target is Real-time locating system, but I would have preferred something like Real-time location (which apparently doesn't exist yet) as the nom refers to. This is in addition to other possible targets that do relate to location in some form at the previous RfD. Mathguy2718 (talk) 14:49, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Downtown Tokyo

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

List Serve

• List Serve → LISTSERV  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Listserve → Mailing list#Electronic mailing list  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Listservs → Mailing list#Electronic mailing list  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not entirely sure where this should redirect; the latter two have previously been retargeted from LISTSERV to Electronic mailing list based on incoming links. 1234qwer1234qwer4 06:45, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 00:03, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Target all to Mailing list#Electronic mailing list. Seems a bit silly not to have all of them in the same place, and probably most users will be thinking of the general concept. Obviously some will want the WP:DIFFCAPS variant with all caps, but many of them will be aware of the capitalisation already, and the rest could be assisted by a simple hatnote in the target section. Nyttend (talk) 06:21, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 03:00, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

I agree with Nyttend, i.e., redirect all three to Mailing list#Electronic mailing list.

I added a short section, Email discussion list (diff). Please edit that as you see fit. Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) [he/him] 18:11, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Y !

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:31, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Minor DC Comics alien species and races

• Black Mercy → List of fictional plants#In comics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Martian (DC Comics)Martian (DC Comics) → DC Universe#Aliens  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• ParademonsParademons → DC Universe#Aliens  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• ThanagarianThanagarian → DC Universe#Aliens  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of alien races in DC Comics, the article to which they pointed was merged, and entries that didn't have their own articles were left out. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:27, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

• If there was a plants section on DC Universe, the Black Mercy would've been added there. I did try to re-add some of the aliens in the aliens' section for DC Universe when they weren't listed, but they were removed by users like @Fiction Fanatic III: and @Rorshacma:. I can't say if Thanagarian and Martian (DC Comics) had their own articles before they were deleted, but Parademon was the victim of an AFD. If anyone wants those articles spared, I suggest that their pages get re-established with the right sources. Any objections? --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:48, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

  The old version of Thanagarian was a redirect to a page which was deleted in 2020 at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thanagar. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:58, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

  I'm sure that was when it talked about what the Thanagarians are like. There has to be some way to get it and the other alien redirects spared in light of what I mentioned in the above. --Rtkat3 (talk) 16:51, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep Black Mercy, which is mentioned at the target. Weak keep Martian (DC Comics); the only description is "White Martians... a subspecies of the Martians", but that's something. Delete the others, which aren't mentioned. --BDD (talk) 14:40, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 06:52, 29 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment to the above - Martian (DC Comics) would be a good idea to keep since Martian Manhunter is not the only Martian in DC Comics. As for Parademon and Thanagarian @BDD:, me and another user tried to list them on the DC Universe's alien section only to be removed by @Fiction Fanatic III: and @Rorshacma:. I'm sure those brief alien entries would be restored to maintain the redirects unless you want Parademon to be redirected to the New Gods of Apokolips section of the New Gods page. --Rtkat3 (talk) 16:55, 29 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment - They were "removed" because you completely ignored the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of alien races in DC Comics that only the entries that were notable, blue-linked entries should be merged. I just had to revert your improper merge again - you may disagree with the consensus at the AFD, but you do not get to arbitrarily ignore it. As for the Redirects in question, if they no longer point to an appropriate target, they should be deleted. This should not be used as a weird workaround to restore content that was previously determined to be non-notable. Rorshacma (talk) 17:09, 29 August 2026 (UTC)

  No, the AfD closure did not mandate the content at the target article and it cannot do that. That's not within the scope of AfD. Katzrockso (talk) 15:09, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Black Mercy - keep per BDD. Martian (DC Comics) - White Martian and Martian Manhunter are articles, and the current target mentions both, the latter only in a template. Martian Manhunter is a Green Martian (It is also at RfD), but not the only one. I think White Martian will be a better target, as it describes well how Whites and Greens were connected, and has comparisons of both. Parademons - retarget to the New Gods section per Rtkat. Thanagarian - retarget to List_of_DC_Universe_locations#Thanagar, the target of Thanagar. Jay 11:42, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

  Well @Jay, that would be considered good targets until worthy sources can help them gain their own articles. The Parademons would've been the redirect to the New Gods of Apokolips section of New Gods. Rtkat3 (talk) 19:48, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To consider the retarget proposals.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 ‡ ^edits 03:07, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 02:58, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

@Voorts: I can understand a final relist if there was not enough participation. Is that the case here, or was your relist for further consideration of one or more of the entries? If so, which ones? Jay 07:52, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

I was hoping consensus could be reached. Seems close but not there. voorts (talk/contributions) 12:02, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Son (meme)

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Will Dunn

• Will DunnWill Dunn → List of Harry Potter cast members#Epilogue characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There are multiple people with this name including a writer and a sportsman, but none with articles. The William Dunn disambig doesn't consider "Will", so that won't be a suitable alternate target. Delete to favour search results.

This was an article though, for 10 days in 2011, before being BLAR'ed. We don't have a page with bios of Harry Potter cast members, so I don't see where the pre-BLAR content can be reused. Jay 13:44, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

• Weak retarget to dab: "Will" isn't explicitly listed at the William page, but it's such a standard nickname that I expect some subset of them are referred to that way sometimes, and the page has "Willie" and similar variants. I was able to find a couple William "Will" Dunns with a quick search, though none notable. No strong objections to deletion, though. Rusalkii (talk) 18:56, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 00:05, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note that multiple changes happened at the target post this nomination. It was renamed (before the relist), and the resulting redirect had its target changed (after the relist). So the target in the original nomination is now List of Harry Potter (film series) cast members. Jay 17:07, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Tbhotch also retargeted the original nomination to Harry Potter cast members, which is a DAB
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 02:42, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Retarget to William Dunn as a standard nickname for anyone with the name. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:26, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Silkies

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Vaccinov

• VaccinovVaccinov → Smallpox#Eradication  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target or anywhere onwiki. Was redirected here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaccinov, which added a mention, but that was removed. I was mildly surprised that there are *no* mentions of him anywhere, though the main smallpox article probably isn't the place and I can't think where would be. Rusalkii (talk) 23:54, 11 September 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Smallpox vaccine, with a new brief cited statement there; a source like Isaacs 2020 (Microbiology Australia 41 (4) 168-171) might be usable. I agree it should not point at Smallpox which does not mention Vaccinov. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:39, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 00:00, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Happy to retarget if a mention is actually added. Smallpox_vaccine#Early_vaccination would probably be the right section? Unsure if it's due weight, would need a more careful analysis of the sources than I feel up to at the moment. Rusalkii (talk) 03:50, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 18

Template:Wikipedia community