Talk:Temporal clause (Latin)
Add topic| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Title
[edit]@LaundryPizza03: I'm not sure it's a good idea to change the name from "Temporal clause (Latin)" to "Temporal clause". The article is not intended to say anything about temporal clauses in any other language (I hope eventually to do a similar article on temporal clauses in Ancient Greek). The new title would be confusing for anyone wanting to investigate temporal clauses in English, for example, since it says nothing about those (they are dealt with very briefly in the article Adverbial clause). Anyway, I think it would be best to change it back to "Temporal clause (Latin)". Kanjuzi (talk) 08:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Kanjuzi: There was no article at the base title, so disambiguation is not needed at the moment. First create a draft on temporal clauses in general linguistics at Draft:Temporal clause, then move this article back to the original title once it is ready for mainspace. Imho, Latin temporal clauses would be a better title for this article, and is more silimar to other articles in Category:Latin grammar. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
"Temporal clause" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Temporal clause has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 September 14 § Temporal clause until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:17, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Latin conditional clauses which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:55, 14 September 2026 (UTC)