Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
Reports
- ~2026-53643-90 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:01, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Edits appear to be in good faith and have edit summaries explaining rationale. SpencerT•C 02:02, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-53775-20 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 21:31, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- Johhnyhere123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:24, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- Rtb1991 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:13, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-53650-11 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 432 five times in the last 5 minutes (Starting new line with lowercase letters, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:26, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-53687-10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:50, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- Jsnsndn828383 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:57, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- Wikieditor20101 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 768 (AIV disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:04, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- BobvJOE (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:07, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-53905-18 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:11, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- BooyahYuya (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Inkster, North Dakota was changed by BooyahYuya (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889 on 2026-10-07T05:28:12+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 05:28, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- Stats Fight (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 80 five times in the last 5 minutes (Link spamming, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:35, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-53558-29 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 491 five times in the last 5 minutes (Edits ending with emoticons or !, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:05, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
User-reported
- ~2026-53717-25 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Blanking article in Wikipedia: space - smells like ~2026-53651-42, ~2026-53465-99 et al. SuperFastSpellChecker (talk) 22:06, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- Moo881x (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Block evasion, LTA (Jeremiah Caquias). Similar style username (see Yggi1x for example), similar one letter at a time spam in their sandbox, and similar nonsense on their talk page (see Yggi1x's talk page). ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 23:17, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-53846-50 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Draft:Strahil Gigov (diff): Block evasion by Special:Contributions/Atanasp123. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 01:12, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- Jsnsndn828383 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Block evasion. nil nz 02:56, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-53558-29 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Vandalism past final warning Strongshorts (talk) 05:59, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- Stats Fight (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Vadim Nemkov: Link spammer under promotional username. See this diff. JavaHurricane 06:06, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- Skibidiman677 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "skibidi" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:20, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- Aga6767 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Somecollegekid123 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
Current requests for increase in protection level
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing on this page and other Ahom-related pages. I think this falls under Contentious topics - South Asia.
EDIT: User in question is the subject of a sock puppetry investigation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ney_konware
Theemausoliam (talk) 05:53, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- @Theemausoliam Isn't this article part of WP:CT/IMH and therefore requires extended-confirmed protection? GoMSTL (talk) 23:44, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- I could see that argument, yes. One focus of the disruptive editing has been the kingdom's conflicts with the Mughals. Theemausoliam (talk) 23:46, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and intense edit-warring by unconfirmed accounts and newly registered users following the breaking Skydance merger news. Standard semi-protection is proving insufficient to control continuous unsourced alterations, speculative timeline additions, and ongoing disputes regarding industry terminology and studio classifications. A temporary cooling-off period is requested to allow the consensus on the article's Talk page to stabilize. 3z0o0o0zi (talk) 13:32, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's being heavily edited, yes, but I see little reverting going on. "Standard semi-protection"? I imposed last year, and it expired in March. I don't see a reason to restore it now, and there isn't a lot of discussion on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. This page and the redirects Special training school and Internet addiction camps are the subject of recent, repeated attention from multiple confirmed sockpuppets, now blocked (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lzyno):
During the first iteration of this article at Chinese boot camps, the page was also subject to a massive sockpuppet campaign (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Free258/Archive); I believe these are linked due to the patterns in usernames and editing behavior.
Also requesting protection for the two redirects, which these sockpuppets have attempted to delete multiple times (see full page logs).
Astaire (talk) 13:54, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- Declined I was aware of the previous issues but none of these three articles have been touched by a problematic editor since August. Please ping me if anything actually happens to them, but we generally do not protect articles "just in case". Black Kite (talk) 14:20, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
none of these three articles have been touched by a problematic editor since August
This is not true; the Darreo sock attempted to delete the Internet addiction camps redirect eight days ago . Astaire (talk) 14:24, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – schoolkid vandalism. Toketaatalk 14:08, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
Blocked IP range. Black Kite (talk) 14:13, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Multiple accounts of anonymous users vandalising pages in page history. Requesting a semi protection only for now to track vandals. Michanpyon (talk) 20:10, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Untamed1910 (talk) 21:28, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- The TA behind the recent wave of vandalism looks to have been blocked. Looking at the history, the previous TA who vandalised the page a couple of weeks back was likely also the same person based on the other pages they also targeted.
- Gourleyo (talk) 22:52, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Curbon7 (talk) 04:39, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: To protect newly added verified content and prevent unconstructive edits or vandalism. Badaabakar90 (talk) 01:42, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. The Bushranger One ping only 04:19, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: There's a temp-account user who keeps changing the name "Kathy Hochul" on this page to instead be "Ugly Face Lady". The page was previously semi-protected because of this, but now the vandalism has re-started. — Jamie Eilat (talk) 02:24, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- This vandal has done the same thing to various NY election pages, including the recent gubernatorial elections, resulting in repeated page protection. An IP block might be a good next step. aesurias (she/her) (talk) 02:36, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
Already protected. Curbon7 (talk) 04:23, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- And : IP address(es) partially blocked (from six New York-themed articles). that they've hit, for a year. The Bushranger One ping only 04:33, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- And :
Indefinite extended protection: This page falls under the arab/israeli conflict contentious topic but editing has not been restricted to extended-confirmed yet. ғѳmɑɭʱɑυե (Any pronouns)ᵀᵃˡᵏ 02:57, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Reason: Protection was bumped from semi to extended confirmed in 2022 after a multi-day long vandal spree waged by a known LTA through multiple throwaway accounts. In the four years since, they are seemly inactive, with their last known account discovered on July 2023 (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Awolf58/Archive). With this in mind, it doesn't seem too unreasonable to give semi another wurl. Giovanni Potage (talk) 11:39, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Based on the disruption on that article and the time elapsed, I think it would be appropriate to downgrade to semi protect the article. It will be enough to stop new vandals and disruptors but not enough to prevent inexperienced editors to do productive changes. The sock puppeteer is user:klayclax and has moved on to other articles. Giovanni has made edits on the talk page.~2026-53576-33 (talk) 12:53, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- Have you checked with the still-active admin who protected the page, per the above instructions? – Muboshgu (talk) 15:40, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- @Muboshgu I requested here because @El C is only semi-active. Regardless, I'm pinging them and @Favonian (who restored the EC protection after a short full protection lasped) for their input. Giovanni Potage (talk) 18:23, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- I don't think he meant me since I currently am not the protecting admin. El_C 18:47, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason: since December 2025, The talk page for human penis has been protected due to disruptive requests on the talk page. While these requests on the talk page were unacceptable, I don’t think it necessitates protection for a talk page indefinitely since it’s been almost a year since the vandalism. At this point, it is gonna stop communication from scientists or doctors who are getting started editing on the talk page more than it will stop goofballs making goofy requests. Unfortunately the protecting administrator’s talk page is protected, so I can’t talk to the protecting administrator. ~2026-53576-33 (talk) 13:26, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- We can still ping Daniel Case here to see what they think. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:41, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- That would be great. ~2026-53576-33 (talk) 18:59, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- The page's history for over a year leading up to the protection shows almost constant vandalism and reversion. Its pageviews since September 2024, about the beginning of that period, remain at the same range, significantly elevated from what they were previously. In short, I do not think unprotection is advisable at this time.
- And you can use he/him for me, OK? Daniel Case (talk) 05:04, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
Unprotection: Protected after socking in 2012, which is unlikely to be a problem again. Worth a shot. CutlassCiera 22:10, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- Are you sure this is the right article? The protection timeline of its former title Las Vegas, Nevada tells the story of a popular vandal target that had to be repeatedly protected throughout several years, not an article that unfortunately fall victim to a dedicated sock/troll with a short shelf life. We're tried WP:TRYUNPROT with other prominent city articles in the past, and most of the time, it was evident protection was still needed. Not to mention, a not insignificant number of people still visit the article daily. (Non-administrator comment) Giovanni Potage (talk) 00:15, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
The Reception section does not reflect external polling, which shows overwhelmingly negative reception. The section never uses the word "negative," and the criticisms it does include are framed as exceptions to an otherwise positive narrative. Please add more coverage of the negative reception as the article currently is incredibly misleading. Staretss (talk) 02:34, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
Not done @Staretss: As it is said in the introduction of this page: "This page is not for holding discussions regarding content." Edit requests follow a "change This for That". This is not a place to ask editors to create content for you. Instead, you have to create that content, summarizing what reliable sources say, and then request it to be added. Tbhotch™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 03:27, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 13 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:13, 7 October 2026 (UTC) |
| 20 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:06, 7 October 2026 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
|||||||||||
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
I have created a range of articles in the past (mostly short biographies of scholars and clergy, along with a few conversions from the National Dictionary of Biography). These have not given rise to any substantial issues, and it occurs to me that it is probably not a good use of patrollers' time to have to review any articles I may write in future, given the backlog. I am a longstanding editor, and as a reasonably experienced NPP reviewer I am thoroughly familiar with the BLP and notability policies. Dionysodorus (talk | contribs) 22:21, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
I plan to replace archive.today or other deprecated archives with web.archive.org, for which AWB would be more than useful. 🐠 formerly U.T. 08:34, 14 September 2026 (UTC)
I plan to semi-automate some typo fixes that I have already been making manually. I have completed several hundred of these edits, mainly removing incorrect spaces between the last word and the following punctuation mark. I would like to request AWB/JWB access, as these tools would be very useful for handling this type of repetitive maintenance work more efficiently. My intended workflow is to identify the relevant cases, apply the correction, review the result, and save the edit. I understand that I remain responsible for reviewing every edit and for following the AWB/JWB guidelines. I am still building my editing experience and intend to use JWB carefully and only for appropriate repetitive maintenance tasks. Score Beethoven (talk) 09:47, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
I want to use AutoWikiBrowser to speed up my deorphaning process as well as for general maintenance tasks. Script7921 (talk) 14:26, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
I'd like to use the script mainly for deduping refs because after installing duplicate-references.js it seems Wikipedia is lousy with them. == Peter NYC 20:55, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights for Janes citation issue. Issue description: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Janes_citation_zotero_issue 3vw5 (talk) 11:43, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
|---|
Confirmed |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed |
| Requests for event coordinator |
|---|
Event coordinator
Hello, I would like to request Event Coordinator status for the UCSC Wiki-a-thon to support BIPOC Scientists and Engineers. It will be on Thursday, October 22nd, 2026 from 2pm - 5pm PT. Here is a link to the event: https://events.ucsc.edu/event/wiki-a-thon-to-support-bipoc-scientists-and-engineers/ Please let me know if there's any more information you need from me. Thank you! Longmermaidhair (talk) 00:28, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for file mover |
|---|
File mover
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
I have now done quite a lot on AFC and reviewed quite a few articles, showing that I understand content policies. Furthermore, if you look at my interactions, you can see that I have always acted civilly and resolved any disputes. From my Counter Vandalism Work, you can see that I always inform a user when I revert their edit; the same happens with AFC (through the AFC helper). I would primarily like this role as a counter-vandalism tool so that I can remove pages that are obviously vandalism, as I think that this is an important thing to do. I would also review other pages in order to help ease the backlog. I would finally like to thank anyone who reviews this request. Cheers,
hi, I would like to renew my NPP rights witch are about to expire. Different articles were reviewed over the last month, often after I added additional refs, images, or added/rephrased some text. After my adjustments, a few articles also got reviewed... by others :o) _regards Haggis MacHaggis (talk) 18:29, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights: I have been editing since January 2025 and have over 1600 edits, among them 16 new articles that I wrote. I have also contributed to AfDs and DYKs and am familiar with Wikipedia guidelines and policies. I would like to help new editors improve their newly added content to Wikipedia and reduce the backlog of new articles. Lynngol (talk) 08:44, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
I am currently a temporary new page reviewer, but it seems this is about to run out. I am looking to extend for longer (hopefully indefinitely). WikipediholicRat (talk) 14:48, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
I believe I am eligible to obtain reviewer status. My account is over the minimum of 90 days old (been here since December), and has a history of I believe at least 500 undeleted edits (reaching around 6000 edits in general in total). I have also not engaged in incivil behavior to others, and I understand WP's policies in regarding matters. One mistake I made prior to submitting a request here, was that I declined one draft myself without knowing you needed to apply first until now. Will this exempt me now from being able to review? Please let me know. Thank you for taking your time. Sharkeston (talk) 17:20, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
My trial rights are about to expire, and I would like to request them either on another trial or on a permanent basis. I think I have done well for my first few weeks as a NPP reviewer, making a few errors here and there but overall, I believe I have grasped the essence of patrolling. A slight error of judgement that I made along the way was also kindly corrected by Thilsebatti TNM101 (in solidarity · chat) 17:32, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
My temporary New Pages Reviewer access is due to expire at 00:00 on 18 October 2026. If I am eligible, I would like to request permanent access before it expires, so that there is no break in my NPP workflow. Thank you. AriuCH (talk) 01:13, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights: i make articles of flora of vegatation zones, and i did my first good article Flora of Samoa Emmanbotan (talk) 09:07, 6 October 2026 (UTC) |
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
Hello I would like to have pending changes reviewer rights, I routinely edit on my account with 500 edits in the past 3 weeks. I also have never participated in vandalism and routinely make productive edits. I have read Policy On Vandalism, Policy On Copyright, and I understand that I must obtain a neutral point of view and the guideline on reviewing. I request these services to help me expand my reach and find new ways of editing and helping Wikipedia. My limited services right now mainly include linking articles and welcoming new users. Thank you for your time and generosity! EzYop (talk) 01:58, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
I sometimes run into articles with pending changes while monitoring recent changes, and it could be helpful to be able to accept or decline them. I already have Rollback rights. Thanks. PeterCooperJr (talk) 02:12, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
I'd like rollback rights in order to make recent change patrolling easier with tools such as Interceptor. Celjski Grad (talk) 16:59, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
I am planning to use WP:Interceptor and I believe rollback would make reverting vandalism more efficient. I believe that I meet the recommended (edited) criteria listed above. Thank you for processing my request! 16dvnk (talk) 05:20, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
Previously had this as a temporary right for fighting vandalism with Huggle. Had a bit of a wiki-break but keen to revisit this. Thanks! sksatsuma 14:19, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights Hi, I would like the rollbacker right to more efficiently fight vandalism. As it is required for many counter-vandalism tools such as Huggle. I have experience in Recent Changes patrol. I also have moderation experience elsewhere. Thank you, Strongshorts (talk) 13:02, 30 September 2026 (UTC) Strongshorts (talk) 13:02, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting rollback rights So that AI Model articles can be as high quality as possible CharlieRidesRollerCoasters (talk) 13:45, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
I would like rollback to handle obvious vandalism more efficiently. I enjoy monitoring for spam, unconstructive edits, and talking to/notifying newer editors . I have read WP:ROLLBACK and will not use the default rollback summary on good-faith or disputed edits. Thanks. DocLG (talk) 22:47, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
Hello again! My name is LuigiMcpe4549. I would like to request rollback rights. That is because I have done some good edits and revert some vandalism on Wikipedia. I think that it is useful in case of crazy vandalism. It's ok if my application is denied again like last time. Cheers! :) LuigiMcpe4549 (talk) 15:06, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
I'd like to have rollback permissions so I can utilize tools like AntiVandal to help out with recent changes patrol. Justcgi (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
I would like to have rollback permissions to use Interceptor while out and about :) TobyKohlhagen (talk) 01:23, 6 October 2026 (UTC) |
| Requests for temporary account IP viewer |
|---|
Temporary account IP viewer
I do a good amount of vandalism reverting, which some of the vandals that I deal with are multiple different temporary accounts vandalising pages in short periods of time. It would be nice to know if they are using the same IP address, so that why I can appropriately report the vandals to AIV. I promise that I will not inappropriately use the tool. MathMan4 (talk) 18:21, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
|
Usage
{{Admin dashboard/header}}
{{Admin dashboard/ab}}
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}}
{{Admin dashboard/csd}}
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}}
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}|
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}|
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}|
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showawb|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showawb}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}|
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showevco}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}|
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}|
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}|
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}|
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}|
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}|
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }}{{#if:{{{showtaiv|}}}|
{{!}} showtaiv {{=}} {{{showtaiv}}} }}
}}
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|no}}}}}<!--
You can re-arrange the order or pick and choose by transcluding elements separately -->
Note that directly transcluding the template or using all the subtemplates above can cause the page to exceed the post-expand include size.
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely sure of purpose at this time. | String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show temporary account IP viewer | showtaiv | Allows hiding the requests for temporary account IP viewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |