Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RFPP)
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection).

After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to remove obvious vandalism.


Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level

Request removal of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level

Request a specific edit be made to a protected page

Request the non-urgent protection of multiple pages that do not require immediate administrator attention


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – As has repeatedly been the case, the page is under attack by a group of temp accounts that change sourced information (specifically plug listings) without sources and without comment, and ignore all invitations to discuss. , , , , .

Since the page has been haunted by similar problems for years, I suggest indefinite semi-protection. Gawaon (talk) 07:24, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Note that this may be related to the long-term SPI case of ImprovisedAlphorn7281, whose socks have repeatedly shown similar editing patterns on that page. Gawaon (talk) 07:35, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – As per WP:ECRCASTE. Ekdalian (talk) 08:28, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – already got 1 year protection 2 year PC, next should be indef. Toketaatalk 13:31, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Toketaatalk 16:58, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs are back after last protection. They keep on doing these edits based "on their own count". Dieter Lloyd Wexler 17:30, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 00:02, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent and repeated disruption by an account-hopping sockmaster. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:34, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Reason: Page was autoconfimred protected in June after I made a request about the near-constant flurry of temporary accounts who leave WP:FORUM comments, usually in Hindi (such as this recent edit). The protection expired in September, and the storm has started up again. I think a (more?) permanent protection is needed, because otherwise, it's just adding more busy work to have to revert these. wound theology◈ 04:12, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Highly visible file for use on a template, not to mention the butt of LTAs and VOAs. See revision history for details. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:55, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Hastein appears in two Crusader Kings video games. For years, an unnecessary "in popular culture" bit has been added. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 07:20, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The day after previous disruptor (MPT) got blocked, a new account jumped in and started doing the same stuff. 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk / Uploads 07:40, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:19, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Maayaaaaa (talk) 11:12, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

User(s) blocked: Emilianoita (talk · contribs) blocked. Favonian (talk) 12:12, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism, largely from temporary accounts. -SlvrHwk (talk) 12:04, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Kamen rider. Toketaatalk 12:24, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

On second thought... Indefinite. Toketaatalk 15:03, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Kamen rider. Toketaatalk 12:24, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – L. Toketaatalk 12:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts to add hoax / spam edits have continued after expiration of the previous semiprotection. MrOllie (talk) 12:43, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Reason: High level of edit warring over whether a recently passed member of the group is still considered an active member, mostly from non-account users. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 13:00, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated adding of unhelpful Angry Birds trivia to lead. GnocchiFan (talk) 13:21, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Indefinite full protection seems a bit too much! — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:15, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Reason: Persistent changes to erroneous birth date by IP editors. Propose permanent protection since problems return after previous time-limited protections expired. Marbe166 (talk) 13:38, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Reason: Persistent disruption and unexplained removal of sourced content. The page has suffered 2 instances of blanking/vandalism this year in February and October, including a disruptive blanking of the lead paragraph. Requesting semi-protection to secure the article. MISTERSIMONI (talk) 13:51, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – this isn't even caleb this time around. Toketaatalk 13:54, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Segaton (talk) 14:24, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – trial unprotected 1 year ago, I would say that the trial failed. Toketaatalk 14:26, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

(Non-administrator comment) +1 PCP also didn't work here (virtually nothing accepted). Given the nature, frequency and history of the vandalism, this is probably a perennial school kid target and therefore better off protected for good. Entranced98 (talk) 14:57, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's a lot of temporary accounts adding random content to the page. – The Grid (talk) 14:27, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Toketaatalk 14:47, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple users. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:58, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Toketaatalk 15:00, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Toketaatalk 15:12, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – had a prior 2 year protection, so you know what time it is... Toketaatalk 15:54, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Toketaatalk 15:56, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

So much vandalism in the edit history. Toketaatalk 15:57, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:03, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

This was trial unprotected April 2025, given the edit history, this seems to be another case of a WP:TRYUNPROT not working out... I would say indefinite semi. Toketaatalk 16:06, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:03, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:11, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content since September 26. - Calmira90 (talk) 16:33, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

This article was created last year. There have basically been no constructive edits for the entirety of the article's existence. I think this should be indefinitely semi protected. Toketaatalk 15:42, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Plasticwonder (Cat got your tongue?) 16:43, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Reason: This page has been subject to disruption multiple times today. It was briefly hijacked, and two subsequent edits by another user have had to be suppressed.

Would semi-protection (or any edit protection at all) be appropriate for this page? – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 16:57, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Another sock puppet account of banned user Defrenzel9 is once again adding the stupid lie about the movie being exclusive only to DirectTV. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 17:07, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same issue with The Father. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 17:08, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA Lam312321321 restoring content from TAs and new accounts. Belbury (talk) 17:12, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request removal of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Requesting reduction in protection to pending changes, page was inf semi-protected over 3 years ago. The page also desperately needs updates and allowing more people to submit edits may help solve this. Szxq (talk) 05:21, 25 September 2026 (UTC)reply

@Ferret: Szxq (talk) 05:25, 25 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit be made to a protected page


Change “Collapse of the June ceasefire (July)” to “Collapse of the June ceasefire (20 June - 31 July)” because the June ceasefire ended on 19 June, not 30 June. ~2026-47054-03 (talk) 00:02, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Is a source for this already in the article? Daniel Case (talk) 02:34, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply

OpenAI has decided to pause its training on all versions ~2026-50272-23 (talk) 15:48, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Source? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Look out it's Jimothy! 16:36, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply
--~2026-50272-23 (talk) 18:07, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply

I wanted to add a section to the Greek alphabet talk page requesting the addition of a list of three-letter Greek letter name abbreviations, which are used in astronomical software (example: Stellarium) and websites (example: SIMBAD). But the talk page can't be edited. I no longer attempt to edit article pages myself because the Wikipedia rules are too complex for me, so now I just request changes and let the experts handle it. Thanks! Source 1: https://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/Pages/guide/chA.htx Source 2: https://archive.aavso.org/greek-letters ~2026-42668-18 (talk) 02:08, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.