Template:Admin dashboard/light
- Frequently, some pages transcluding {{Admin dashboard}} are going on overflow and appear at Category:Pages_where_post-expand_include_size_is_exceeded.
This Template:Admin dashboard/light has been rewritten by including directly all the parts that were dispersed in so many sub-templates. - The "leaks out boxes" error has been fixed.
- Pages RFPP and UNFAA are simply linked (i.e. not transcluded) when too busy
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]
- ~2026-43273-28 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 21:37, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- ~2026-29638-29 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Riyadh Air (diff): vandalism after final warning. Persistent removal of sourced content and addition of unsourced content. Danners430 tweaks made 09:05, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 2 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 9 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 1 |
| Other candidates | 71 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 18 items
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 69 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item
Requested RD1 redactions – 1 item
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- Wikikeekit (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "kike" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 09:50, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Officialprimo (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:30, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 13:30, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Stage names and pen names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. (According to original userpage, this is a single individual's stage name.) — ERcheck (talk) 19:15, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- Applicationdeveloper786 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit] | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – As one user has repeatedly recreated this template under multiple names, please set to require at least WP:TPE to create if not admin only. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 14:05, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced additions of a possible football transfer. • Quinn (talk • it/its) 17:19, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Pending changes protection: Persistent addition of unsourced/poorly-sourced material + sockpuppetry + vandalism. TA edits are rarely consecutive in this article. So I think it would be a good idea to put all non-autoconfirmed edits under review. Giovanni Potage (talk) 19:31, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – TA hopping vandal. at least 3 today. Jackjd0 (talk) 19:53, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 04:55, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits by TA/IP Address. Gunther : Talk 04:58, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection, vandalism, persistent removal and distortion of the well-sourced content. Vuzorg (talk) 10:10, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Peterxy（talk） 10:24, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Entranced98 (talk) 12:01, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- Hyderabad Disaster Response and Asset Protection Agency (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP user keeps on coming with different temporary accounts and continues bolding a certain section in the lead "Enforcement Vigilance and Disaster Management Department (EV&DM)" unnecessarily. It's not per MOS:BOLD. I tried contacting them in all instances to get their inputs on this. No response has been received. Even their edit summary doesn't say anything. Requesting temporary semi protection due to the disruptive editing by a non-responsive user. Wikipicked (talk) 13:26, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Doing promotions with new accounts. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 15:31, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HanTsî (talk) 16:55, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tbhotch™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 18:27, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated attempts at adding a Fandom-backed TV inclusion. In solidarity, Jalen Barks (Woof) 19:11, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Reason: There is frequent disruption from TAs, some related to ARBPIA and some related to his nationality/ethnicity/identity Rainsage (talk) 20:29, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite semi-protection. Persistent IP and SPA vandalism for more than a year . Some BLP violations too . WP:ARBGSCT and WP:CT/BLP apply here. V. S. Video (talk) 23:38, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of negative content to an article covered under WP:BLP. Has been occurring for at least 2 years at this stage. Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 01:47, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Non-constructive edits by temp accounts, see Special:Diff/1367454370, Special:Diff/1363931829, and Special:Diff/1363131690. Musashi1600 (talk) 09:31, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Reason: High level of recent temporary account vandalism. ~2026-42834-99 (talk) 13:58, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion. MrOllie (talk) 14:41, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – LTA hoax. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Reason: WP:CT/IMH pattersonuwu njz (talk) 17:23, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Possible sockpuppets as well. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:36, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruption (including vandalism) from multiple temporary accounts. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 18:18, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. -- Alex talk 23:16, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary account vandalism in ctop aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 03:02, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Over the past couple weeks, various TAs and newly-registered editors have been attempting to use the subject's own birthplace myth as undisputed fact. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 05:08, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Reason: He (my brother) has died. NAQW93 (talk) 05:29, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Correction: User:NAQW93 is the page to be protected. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:29, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Contrary to WP:NOTLIST, SPA continues to add store locations despite the registered account (Daniel Mansell (talk · contribs)) being blocked from editing live pages. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 05:50, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Player changed his name, editors adding back the old one. Kante4 (talk) 08:02, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Type of protection: Semi-protection (or extended confirmed protection if deemed more appropriate).
Reason: Article experiencing persistent disruptive editing from IP and newly registered account despite repeated reverts.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/~2026-38357-34
- User:Itsekiri writing (also noted at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Itsekiri_people#h-Restoration_of_the_article_and_notice_regarding_disruptive_editing-20260727082700)
Article history: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yoruba_people&action=history
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protecting this due to upcoming game. Can we do this for a week?. Bryce M (talk) 12:53, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism and editing traffic. Fixingthelies2025 (talk) 14:01, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/PIA. Isi96 (talk) 14:04, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Yue🌙 (talk) 20:27, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. In solidarity, Jalen Barks (Woof) 14:33, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Reason: High level of temporary account vandalism - unconfirmed reports of subject's passing with vandal edits linking to a disreputable source that's potentially malware. E247G (talk) 14:41, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 14:58, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Requesting protection for newly created talk page template. - Otherwise (Antibacklog Aktion!) (talk?) 15:05, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit-warring between two TAs. A war seems like it shouldn't be open for just anyone to edit. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 17:26, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support upping to indefinite extended confirmed protection as this should be covered under arbitration enforcement. Netstars22 (talk to me!) 17:49, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support this as well. The 2026 Iran War is explicitly restricted as part of PIA, and this is a subtopic of it that also deals with PIA issues. I'm here because I was requesting PP myself and saw someone had already requested it. It's a freaking mess in there thanks to TA's fighting each other. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 21:36, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption to overturn a consensus merge decision. --JBL (talk) 17:39, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. WP:CT/PIA Netstars22 (talk to me!) 17:52, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Tbhotch™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 17:56, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Tbhotch™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 17:56, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection?: This article just got unprotected following a two-day full protection. However, the protection log shows that the article was actually semi-protected indefinitely before a series of disruptive page-moves caused the move protection to be upgraded, but also for the edit protection duration to be changed from indefinite to two days before getting fully protected. Given that the article continues to see vandalism even with semi-protection, and the request leading to the indefinite protection stating that it has been "going on for years", should this article have its indefinite semi-protection restored? BriDash9000 (talk) 18:00, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:14, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:16, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator CoconutOctopus. Favonian (talk) 20:20, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of copyrighted material by new accounts. Mellamelina (talk) 18:03, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: requesting indefinite administrator level for this -- per filter log. Preventing further triggers or access. And also, I will not be editing that page myself. — B.J (talk) 18:04, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Generic file name. Also salted on commons. ScalarFactor (talk) 20:03, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent temporary account vandalism. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lakers96 and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lakers96/Archive. Jacob Rampino (talk) 20:24, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent POV pusing from TAs that appear to be related. ButlerBlog (talk) 20:43, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Reason: unupdated page since June https://www.thestatesman.com/world/iran-power-struggle-erupts-as-khamenei-corners-pezeshkian-hands-irgc-chief-control-over-us-policy-report-1503624119.html https://gulfnews.com/world/mena/irans-power-struggle-is-mojtaba-khamenei-sidelining-pezeshkian-over-the-strait-of-hormuz-dispute-over-approach-to-us-1.500629776 https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/3/trump-blasts-duplicitous-iran-after-tehran-denies-it-is-in-talks-with-the-us https://www.nbcnews.com/world/iran/trump-iran-talks-attacks-canceled-hormuz-nuclear-rcna590535 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/aug/03/trump-meets-his-obstinate-match-in-irans-hardball-regime ~2026-42895-18 (talk) 07:08, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Unupdated is not a sufficient reason for unprotection (it's also wrong with 89 edits since June 30th). But getting back to here, you have not followed the highlighted rule above of contacting the protecting admin first (conditional on if they are still an active admin, and Daniel Case is). But that is a moot point, as any request for protection lowering on this article will be automatically declined as the article is protected under WP:CT/PIA and protection CANNOT be unprotected at any venue other than ArbCom enforcement. The article's talk page is not protected, so you may make reliably sourced edit requests there. Zinnober9 (talk) 16:46, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Zinnober9: Unprotection can't even be done at Enforcement. It would require that WP:ARBPIA4#ARBPIA General Sanctions be amended to eliminate the XCR (which would in turn obsolete WP:ARBPIA5#ECP by default), which I don't see happening for the next several years at minimum. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Look out it's Jimothy! 17:00, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- I didn't mean to omit the WP:ARBPIA4#ARBPIA General Sanctions, but same difference, the unprotection request won't be granted here and will almost certainly be declined at all venues due to that ruling for many years to come due to that blanket protection on the topic. Zinnober9 (talk) 17:17, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Zinnober9: Unprotection can't even be done at Enforcement. It would require that WP:ARBPIA4#ARBPIA General Sanctions be amended to eliminate the XCR (which would in turn obsolete WP:ARBPIA5#ECP by default), which I don't see happening for the next several years at minimum. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Look out it's Jimothy! 17:00, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]
Handled requests
[edit]
| 5 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 11:45, 4 August 2026 (UTC) |
| 32 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 06:43, 4 August 2026 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
[edit]- LivingLife1976 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have created 35+ articles and intend to continue creating more. I believe my article creation history demonstrates familiarity with Wikipedia's content and sourcing policies, and so I am requesting the autopatrolled right to help reduce workload for New Pages Patrol.LivingLife1976 (talk) 11:25, 1 August 2026 (UTC) LivingLife1976 (talk) 11:25, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) @LivingLife1976 Kismet Ke Here Phere created in mainspace on 20 July, tagged for additional citations the following day, orphan-tagged on 30 July (not a big deal), and moved by you to draftspace on 1 August "for further improvement", less than four hours before this request was filed. I believe this indicates that at least one very recent creation benefited from the scrutiny this permission would have bypassed.
- But then, on 16 February Diannaa removed 1,113 bytes from Draft:Rawal Jagmal, identifying the removed material as copied from a published gazetteer. I would not treat this incident alone as decisive, especially given your subsequent works, but copyright familiarity is directly relevant as an autopatrolled user. So, I'd recommend waiting for a longer clean record of fully prepared mainspace creations, after all, that is what this bit is about; it doesn't make you capable of anything special on-wiki. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:10, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- CostalCal (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have created 50+ articles, including one improvment GA: Bishop O'Dowd High School. I have done much recent work at WP:AFC and previous work (10,000+ reviews) at WP:NPP. I believe that my two most recent article Zachary's Chicago Pizza and Thunder Bay 36 Fire is a testament to my well-sourced, well-organized, and well-written articles. I've since been more careful to verify sources match the claims they support, as raised in my previous request. Thanks, CostalCal (talk) 07:07, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot talk 07:10, 3 August 2026 (UTC)- @CostalCal:
Not done It's only been a week. Please wait at least a month so there's time for NPP reviewers to look at your contributions. voorts (talk/contributions) 13:41, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- @voorts Sorry, are autopatrolled and NPP being conflated incorrectly? CostalCal (talk) 15:02, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- @CostalCal: No. Your AP request was declined on July 25. I am declining again because there were issues identified with your edits and it's only been a week. Please build up a clean history before applying again. voorts (talk/contributions) 15:19, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- @voorts Sorry, are autopatrolled and NPP being conflated incorrectly? CostalCal (talk) 15:02, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- @CostalCal
- I immediately noticed multiple simple issues on Zachary's Chicago Pizza:
- All five magazines/newspapers listed in the lede should be italicized. (this occurs in the article body too)
- The first sentence of the article's body reads "
The company was founded on July 25, 1983 by...
" – it is missing a comma and should read "The company was founded on July 25, 1983, by...
" - Same issue at "
Zachary's opened a second location in Berkeley, California on...
", which should read "Zachary's opened a second location in Berkeley, California, on...
" (this occurs again with Oakland) - There are MOS:GEOLINK issues in the infobox
- I dont have time to take a full look at Thunder Bay 36 Fire but immediately noticed "
By late July, the fire measured to be at almost 314,000 hectares by 28–29 July
" - aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 02:57, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Aesurias Look, I'm not hear to argue with you, and yes these are issues I will address. However, Auto-patrolling aside these are minor issues. Also, Thunder Bay 36 Fire is in Canadian English. CostalCal (talk) 03:25, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- They're definitely minor issues @CostalCal but good examples of where (in my opinion) you can demonstrate your attention to detail, which will help you if/when you re-apply :)
- In any form of English, the phrasing of the sentence I mentioned from Thunder Bay 36 Fire does not make sense. One of the bolded sections can be removed as redundant. aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 03:38, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- These are nitpicks, not something I'd decline AP over. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:28, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Aesurias Look, I'm not hear to argue with you, and yes these are issues I will address. However, Auto-patrolling aside these are minor issues. Also, Thunder Bay 36 Fire is in Canadian English. CostalCal (talk) 03:25, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- Panecashio (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
My account has been see's new here, but i am fully and completely more knowledgeable outside the platforms for high quality articles reviewed. Knowledgeable for formatting, reliable sources news and other layout for articles, i am fully understand the policies regarding the articles and other related to this, i am fully happy to be reviewed. Thank you so much. Panecashio (talk) 13:27, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has created roughly 7 articles. — MusikBot talk 13:30, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Panecashio: I don't think you understand what you're applying for. Not done voorts (talk/contributions) 13:30, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Jishara (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi! I'm here to request permanent autopatrolled rights. I was previously granted a 2-month temporary autopatrolled right back in June, but the period will end on August 11th. In total, I've created over 130 articles for Wikipedia with a focus on biographies of underrepresented individuals, including 10 DYKs, and have brought two articles to GA status. I've also been quite active in the Articles for Deletion procedure and in GA reviewing. I've grown quite familiar with the process of article creation on Wikipedia, and plan to continue creating more articles, so I'd love to get permanent autopatrolled rights. Thank you! Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 20:40, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Arcticocean (expires 00:00, 11 August 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 20:50, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]- Sulfurboy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Efficiency in page moves related to AfC activities. Sulfurboy (talk) 06:04, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- IVORK (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Was previously accepted here, but I "soft vanished" which removed all perms. I have since unvanished & resumed editing & been otherwise declared fine to repursue perms since in good standing per Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive382#Restoring_user_rights_for_unvanished_editors. Returning to the same, would aid in AFC publishing & other non-controversial page moves ISO that. Used to patrol WP:RM/TR which I've just also submitted a request in — IVORK Talk 14:19, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- 0ximjub43r (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am requesting the pending changes reviewer permission to assist with maintaining the quality of articles on English Wikipedia. My contributions have primarily focused on expanding and improving articles by adding reliable, independent sources, improving references, and organizing content in accordance with Wikipedia's content policies. 0ximjub43r (talk) 22:12, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
- MSWS (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am familiar with Wikipedia and its guidelines; occasionally come across pending changes I'd like to review. MSWS (talk) 03:18, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- MathMan4 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights I would like to be able to review edits that are on pending changes pages, as well as unprotected pages. I have 900 edits now, which a good number of them are anti-vandal edits. I also feel that I have a good knowledge on Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I feel I could use that knowledge on pending changes pages as well as unprotected pages. MathMan4 (talk) 06:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- Mascius (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to review pending changes encountered during recent edits patrol. I am familiar with Wikipedia's content policies. Mascius (talk) 18:28, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- FlammablePizza (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
In my recent changes patrols, I semi-frequently come across pending changes. If the changes are vandalism, I revert them, but I would also like the ability to accept good pending changes while I'm at it. I already have rollback, extended confirmed, and over 1.6k edits. I also have read and am familiar with the relevant policies. FlammablePizza (talk) 21:20, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
- Bungle491 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to have pending changes reviewer rights, because I occasionally come across pending changes that I am interested in accepting/not accepting on the recent changes page. I have experience with the necessary policies from actions like patrolling recent changes, writing articles that go through the AfC process to get accepted, and DyK and GA participation. Bungle491 (talk) 19:54, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- Jackjd0 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have made a few thousand edits now, many of which are in blp/ antivandalism, and i very regularly see pending changes that i feel i have the skills and knowledge to appropriately approve or deny, and generally think this is a good way i can continue to help contribute to wikipedia. i have read the relevant guidelines and feel my experience applies pretty directly to evaluating all the criteria except copyright, but i am more than willing and able to learn and have been reading up on the copyright policies in advance of sending this request. Jackjd0 (talk) 20:02, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- AriuCH (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to request Rollback rights. My last request was on 18 May. According to previous advice, I have tried to follow a clear workflow, including issuing warnings and reporting Vandalism, Block evasion, and Disruptive editing at AIV, RFPP, and AN/EW. In addition, I use Twinkle for warnings, reports, and reverts. AriuCH (talk) 18:27, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
- أوس (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've recently been using SWViewer and Twinkle to revert vandalism, so this permission would be very useful for me. I'm already very familiar with how it works, as I already have this permission on other Wikimedia projects. -- 🐦🔥 Aws 💬 Talk 14:23, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Vydrakk (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to request Rollback permissions firstly in order to make use of tools like Huggle & AntiVandal. Secondly rollback permissions will allow me to increase the speed of my workflow as most of it consists of RC patrolling edits by unregistered & new accounts. My contribution history demonstrates that I have multiple months of RC Patrol experience and no history of edit warring. At the time of writing this I have 656 live edits of which 220 are in the Main namespace and 262 are in the User Talk namespace, this shows my track record of consistently notifying editors when reverting their edits. Vydrakk (talk) 10:03, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thomasfan1916 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to request my Rollback rights. My previous request on June 15 was declined because I was blocked for making disruptive edits. Since I'm autoconfirmed, I use Twinkle to revert the edits which was vandalized by the IPs (or later TAs). Thomasfan1916[built buses?] 20:15, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Norellia.sh (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am requesting permanent rollback rights after a 1 month trial in the past, as well as my recent 3 month trial. Over the course of the past few months, I have served as a CVUA instructor, and have continued using antivandalism tools like Wikishield and CVPI to prevent vandalism from infecting the wiki. 「Norellia.sh」(talk) 08:29, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by HJ Mitchell (expires 00:00, 31 July 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 08:30, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
- Bungle491 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to request rollback rights. I check the recent changes page a couple times a day and I use Twinkle currently to revert vandalism. I have over 200 mainspace edits as well as extended-confirmed permissions. I always use warning templates after reverting edits and make reports to AIV when necessary. Rollback would help me look through recent changes much more effectively with tools such as Interceptor or WikiShield. If not permanent, a month-long trial run of rollback would also work, so that I could reapply eventually. Bungle491 (talk) 06:27, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
- Mustbeotherwise (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have antivandalism experience and I am requesting rollback permissions to be better equipped to fight vandals. My track record shows that I'm good at differentiating between vandalism and good faith edits, and responding accordingly. - Otherwise (Talk?) 02:50, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- MathMan4 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting rollback rights I have 900 edits now, which a lot of them are reverting vandalism and ensuring pages follow Wikipedia's quality guidelines. I feel that being able to rollback pages/edits will help me ensure that Wikipedia's quality standards are being met, especially when a user has made multiple poor-quality edits. MathMan4 (talk) 05:57, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- Tenshi Uisu (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting rollback rights, I mainly edit reality shows and there are constantly fan edits. I have to revert in most cases to stable one but it unfortunately also includes some good edits. Overall, extra hard work. Rollback will definitely help me. :) Tenshi Uisu (talk) 16:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- Fortek67 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Been on wp for almost a year now with 5000 edits, already use Twinkle on a regular basis and would be useful when I'm reviewing pages. Fortek67 (talk) 12:13, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
- Alpha Beta Delta Lambda (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to request rollback rights as it will help me fight vandalism. I currently use Twinkle and I would like to use tools such as CVPI to revert vandalism quicker. Alpha Beta Delta Lambda (talk) 22:00, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- Mathew D'Marco (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Articles are often subjected to persistent vandalism by unregistered IP users or even newly registered users. Such edits are frequently spotted while patrolling recent changes. Reverting these edits using the Twinkle gadget is quite cumbersome. I know when to use rollback. Mathew D'Marco (talk) 17:33, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Template editor
[edit]- Axolitl (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi. I am requesting TE rights so I can make edits to template-protected template faster. I have numerous (over 5) template requests, of which I believe around 5 have been accepted, and have made over 3 sandbox edits. My main template edite are those which help readability on Dark Mode while minimally affecting light mode, such as my series of edite to Wdefcon templates ({{Edit COI/backlog}}, {{AfC information}}, etc.). With TE, I would be able to make more of these, alongside others. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 22:49, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- Standard Guidelines review:
(guideline: >1 year, applicant: 1.5 year)- (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~1100)
- (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: 170)
- (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: N/A)
- (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 6)
(guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 3 (plus 1 pending))
- Primefac (talk) 22:11, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Standard Guidelines review:
- This request has gone unanswered for a while, so I'll ping @Primefac who checked the guidelines for me. Since making this request, I now have 8 fulfilled Template-protected edit requests () and 3 pending (). Is this enough for my request to be reviewed again? Thanks, Axolitl (talk | contribs) 12:56, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Done for a three-month trial. Primefac (talk) 13:22, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- CharlesEditor23 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- Previous request (March 2026)
I recently possessed the template editor right, but it expired on July 1. I would like to request permanent template editor rights. I have met all the criteria for granting. I also am willing to prove I can be responsible again with possessing the template editor right permanently. CharlesEditor23 (talk) 05:13, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
- Could you point to a few examples of where you have used the right on high-risk templates in the past few months? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:35, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
- Yes. I have used the template editor right on Module:Gridiron color/data & Module:College color/data, which are both high-risk templates. Here's the edit diff from May 22, 2026 from when I previously had the WP:TPE right and used it to change the HTML hex color codes for the Canadian Football League (CFL)'s Hamilton Tiger-Cats. Here's the edit diff from April 29, 2026 from when I previously had the template editor right and used it to change the historical HTML color codes for the National Football League (NFL)'s Dallas Cowboys. Here's the edit diff from March 29, 2026 from when I previously had the template editor right and used it to change the URL source reference for the California Golden Bears. CharlesEditor23 (talk) 03:40, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
- Are the examples I've provided sufficient enough? The main reason why I'm requesting WP:TPE right is so I may be able to make changes to high risk templates such as Module:Gridiron color/data & Module:College color/data. I'm happy to answer any & all other questions. CharlesEditor23 (talk) 16:47, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
- I will note I haven't had a chance to look at them yet; please be patient. Primefac (talk) 21:53, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
- I will note I am somewhat concerned about a lack of forethought and/or sandboxing, specifically:
- Special:Diff/1348435472 and Special:Diff/1348440671, made 30 minutes apart
- Special:Diff/1358471990 ("testing adding historical codes") and Special:Diff/1358490055 ("never mind")
- That being said, there does appear to be a reasonable amount of sandboxing for some of these changes (e.g. Special:Diff/1348021134), and I am very appreciative of the descriptive edit summaries (With a courtesy ping to WikiOriginal-9 who edits the same modules without any summaries). As I think I've said before, no one is perfect (my talk page is a perfect example of that), and (so far) no one seems to have noticed or cared about the occasionally-rapid-reverts of changes. I'd like to wait to hear what MSGJ thinks about this since they asked the initial follow-up question, but I think at the moment I am tentatively an accept. Primefac (talk) 13:20, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- I will note I am somewhat concerned about a lack of forethought and/or sandboxing, specifically:
- I will note I haven't had a chance to look at them yet; please be patient. Primefac (talk) 21:53, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
- Dw31415 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello! My bot CutlassBot is applying the {{Deprecated archive}} template (recently protected). I’d like template editor permission while the bot is doing its run to apply the template so that I can handle any issues that come up for example, I have one change request pending at Module talk:Deprecated archive. I don’t intend to change any other high risk templates during this run. This is my first template so I don’t meet the guideline criteria. Alternatively, maybe we remove the protection from the module, but I think it’s lower risk to grant me the editor privileges for 3 months. Thanks for considering! Dw31415 (talk) 07:27, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Policies and links
