Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

8 August 2026

To nominate an article for deletion or merging, follow these instructions.

Guide to deletion

Mahammad Mammadov (scientist)

Mahammad Mammadov (scientist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page on an Azerbaijani scientist which was previously draftified as the majority of the page was unsourced; see Draft:Mahammad Mammadov (scientist) for the history. Page creator added a few links (not sources for claims) and moved it back to main, deleting maintenance tags at the same time. At a minimum draftify, but since this is now AfD the question of notability has to be considered with delete an option. I am dubious about a pass of NPROF, the GS profile I found has an h-factor of 2, and I am dubious about NBIO. There is of course the language issue. Ldm1954 (talk) 21:39, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Engineering, and Azerbaijan. Ldm1954 (talk) 21:39, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Beata MonaLisa

Beata MonaLisa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This formal merge proposal was incorrectly opened on the article's talk page. Following the March 2026 RfC, formal merge discussions are now held at AfD rather than the historical Proposed article mergers process (PAM). I've moved the discussion accordingly per WP:TPO.

Moved from Talk:Beata MonaLisa § Proposed merge into Malena Ernman

 – FaviFake (talk) 21:28, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Proposed merge into Malena Ernman

I propose merging this article into the article about her mother, Malena Ernman. Based on the currently available sources, it is not clear to me that Beata MonaLisa satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines for a standalone biography. Xan747 (talk) 16:56, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

@Thriley: as page creator and per my talk page, you may be interested in this. I need longer to decide whether to vote or not.--Launchballer 17:08, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose The majority of the coverage she has received is independent of her mother. I'm seeing many articles about her published in the last 12 months which focus on her performance work and advocacy. A merge to her mother's page would not make sense. Thriley (talk) 17:37, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
• Support A section about a daughter who also is a singer and who has performed together with her mother is relevant. If Beata gets more notable, it is easy to create an article about her. Lova Falk (talk) 17:53, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment. There was a piece in sv:Nyheter24 published two days ago. Seems to be a summary of information published elsewhere. Apparently, she's soon to publish her first album, and given her family (not just her sister but also her mother, who is well known in Sweden) I'd assume there'll be more reporting. If this is merged, there should be no prejudice to recreating this article relatively soon if the sourcing situation changes. /Julle (talk) 10:49, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Bands and musicians, Women, and Sweden. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:58, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment In addition to the articles cited in the article, she has received coverage in il Fatto Quotidiano: , Hello: , La Vanguardia: , Leggo: , Il Messaggero: , La Nación: , El Español: , Expressen: , and Fashion Times: . Most of the coverage relates her to the work of her sister, not her mother, so a redirect to the mother's article does not make sense. Thriley (talk) 20:00, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting since this has had someone bring material here recently
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dr vulpes (Talk) 21:23, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Mawarid Finance

Mawarid Finance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure how this company could pass WP:NCORP. Most of the coverage I could find on it are either trivial, have a conflict of interest due to being involved in deals with the company, or are just rewritten press releases. Nighfidelity (talk) 19:13, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, Islam, and United Arab Emirates. Nighfidelity (talk) 19:13, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Abhijit Amkar

Abhijit Amkar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The person has played lead role in 2 project, but we need SIRS to establish notability and WP:NACTOR. All the references are routine announcement of this project and some are relationship rumor, so fails notability. Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 18:30, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, India, and Maharashtra. Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 18:30, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Television-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:19, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Merrelyn Emery

Merrelyn Emery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing how this passes WP:NPROF. Lots of puffery added by a WP:COI editor might make it seem that way, but there's nothing there there. Could possibly be merged/redirected to Fred Emery as an alternative. Sulfurboy (talk) 18:23, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:20, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Science-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:20, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:20, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Women-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:20, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Tradebe

Tradebe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm seeing passing mentions, press releases, and primary sources, but no significant coverage in unambiguously reliable sources. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:09, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Environment, and Spain. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:09, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Reconomy

Reconomy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Moved to mainspace by creator whose exclusive interest is this company. No evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources. Existing sources are all corporate puffery or routine coverage of acquisitions. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:05, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Environment, and United Kingdom. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:05, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Minnesota Kings

Minnesota Kings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page is completely unsourced. Does not meet WP:FOOTY/Notability#Club_notability or WP:GNG. Pksois23 (talk) 17:58, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Football-related AfD discussions. Pksois23 (talk) 17:58, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Synthetic colorant

Synthetic colorant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See discussion below. The article is some student creation that duplicates mature, well-curated articles on dye and pigment. The proposal is that this article would disappear and the little useful or unique convent would be transferred to dye and pigment.--Smokefoot (talk) 19:32, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 August 8. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:50, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Science, Chemistry, and Technology. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 18:02, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Weak keep I was prepared to scream "delete," but this article seems distinct enough from dye and pigment to warrant its own article. However, it needs a lot of work. It needs a massive amount of trimming, and I think a change of title to History of synthetic dyes or something similar would be appropriate, as the content is almost entirely a survey of the history of synthetic "colorants". WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:48, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

World History Association

World History Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My BEFORE only shows routine coverage, mostly of someone being appointed vice president/president elect and a few mentions of the awards being handed out. The little I could find on JSTOR and Books is trivial coverage mentioning that it exists and date from the 90s. I don't see GNG and I don't see NCORP. Jerod Lycett (talk) 17:36, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related AfD discussions. Jerod Lycett (talk) 17:36, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Hard Yakka

Hard Yakka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure on this one; found while tracking spam. Difficult to find significant coverage in amongst the sales sites and results for the slang term but coverage of the brand seems sparse. Only one source in the article is a secondary, reliable source that covers the brand (the rest are about the slang term). A merge to Wesfarmers might be a better idea if there's more coverage than that one piece but not enough to sustain a standalone article. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:28, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Australia. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:28, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Bo Kata

Bo Kata (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Article was created by the filmmaker himself. There is no genuine media coverage or film reviews by critics about this short documentary. BookishReader (talk) 15:53, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 15:55, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus.

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

• Keep. The nominator's claim that there is "no genuine media coverage or film reviews by critics" is factually incorrect. Per WP:OFFLINE, WP:NFILM, and WP:GNG, the documentary has extensive contemporary print and modern secondary coverage:

1. Major National Press Coverage (The Express Tribune, Feb 9, 2026): "Kites in the sky, stories on screen: Basant in Punjabi cinema and music" — In-depth secondary coverage analysing Bo Kata (2007) as a foundational cinematic archive documenting Lahore's Basant culture, kite artisans, and the historical debates surrounding the 20-year ban.
2. Cultural & Media Commentary (Pakeez, Feb 10, 2026):' "Basant in Punjabi Cinema and Music: Preserving Lahore's Kite Festival Through Art" — Secondary coverage highlighting Bo Katas role in preserving the socio-economic and musical history of Basant.
3. National Award Recognition: Nominated for the Satyajit Ray Film Foundation Award (2007) in association with the BFI (British Film Institute) and British Council (see Bite the Mango 2007 program).
4. Industry Press & Film Circuit: Featured in Sound on Sound Magazine for its technical score and sound design, and selected in competition at DOCSDF / DOCSMX (Mexico City) and the Monterrey International Film Festival.
5. Critical Review & Contemporary Print Press (Perthshire Advertiser, 2009): Features direct critical evaluation by Director Douglas Mackinnon (Doctor Who, Good Omens), calling Bo Kata "a beautifully made film with atmospheric music." Also documents the BFI / British Council nomination (see press scan).
6. EIFF Industry Recognition: Director Shehzad Afzal recognized as an EIFF Trailblazer by Edinburgh International Film Festival Artistic Director Hannah McGill.
7. British Council (included in the official documentary register) and British Film Institute Recognition: As per Satyajit Ray Film Foundation Short Film Award Nomination.

The article clearly meets WP:GNG and WP:NFILM through verifiable contemporary print reviews and secondary national media coverage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kcoripop (talk • contribs) 18:39, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Please don't use LLM to communicate here: see WP:LLMCHAT. We would like to hear your own words. Also, if your recent edits to this article are LLM, please revert or rewrite them, see WP:NOLLM. M kuhner (talk) 19:13, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi there, the words were my own using formatting though. Have removed - apologies, will fix and amend. Kcoripop (talk) 20:49, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. The nominator's claim that there is "no genuine media coverage or film reviews by critics" is factually disproven by independent secondary press and contemporary reviews. Per WP:NFILM, WP:OFFLINE, and WP:GNG, the documentary has extensive coverage that can be referenced.

However, in terms of broadsheet and modern secondary coverage, the film is analysed in detail in The Express Tribune as retrospective reviews/coverage ("Kites in the sky, stories on screen: Basant in Punjabi cinema and music", Feb 9, 2026) as a foundational cinematic archive of Lahore's Basant culture and kite artisans. Further secondary commentary on its cultural preservation is featured in Pakeez ("Preserving Lahore's Kite Festival Through Art", Feb 10, 2026).

For the critical evaluation and contemporary print press, the Bo Kata film features a direct review in the Perthshire Advertiser (2009) by director Douglas Mackinnon (Doctor Who, Good Omens), who described it as "a beautifully made film with atmospheric music." This appears in a press cutting on the subject website from 2009 . The film was also nominated for the Satyajit Ray Film Foundation Award (2007) in association with the BFI and British Council (documented in the Bite the Mango program), featured in Sound on Sound Magazine for its score and sound design, and selected in official competition at DOCSDF / DOCSMX in Mexico City and the Monterrey International Film Festival.

The documentary clearly meets WP:NFILM and WP:GNG through verifiable contemporary print reviews, institutional recognition, and major secondary press coverage. Kcoripop (talk) 21:14, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

The Express Tribune article is a "web desk" report. Pakeez is just a blog/website article without a byline. Your awards are non-notable. Sound on Sound is a promotional referral link. I don't know if article in Perthshire Advertiser exists - even if it exists it is a local "tabloid", and cannot be used to meet WP:GNG. BookishReader (talk) 21:34, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

To clarify the policy points regarding the sources mentioned in the article:

Per WP:RS and WP:GNG, The Express Tribune is a major national broadsheet with established editorial oversight, and staff/desk reporting in national press constitutes reliable secondary coverage.

Regarding the Perthshire Advertiser, WP:GNG does not exclude regional print press, and under WP:OFFLINE, print coverage in established commercial newspapers (Reach plc) remains valid coverage whether accessed online or via print/microfiche archives.

Combined with the BFI, British Council, and Satyajit Ray Film Foundation nomination records, the independent secondary coverage is sufficient to satisfy WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Kcoripop (talk) 22:43, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

In my opinion the Express Tribune source could be okay: it's a brief review of the movie and puts it in a cultural context. The Perthshire "review" (linked in an upstream AfD case) is one line long and cannot be SIGCOV. Sound on Sound mentions the movie for two lines, and is being mischaracterized: it's "20 ways to create cash with your audio gear and skills". The movie is not featured, it's barely mentioned. There's a pattern here of gross misrepresentation of the sources. Delete as notability not shown--though this is the closest of the three related articles and finding two more good reviews or real discussions could change my vote. (Not nominations or short-listings, press releases, or pay-to-play awards.) M kuhner (talk) 02:50, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - autobiographies are disfavored because they almost always have original content. See WP:NABOBS: Modi and other powerful men want to use this as an excuse to ruin us financially. Bearian (talk) 12:56, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:13, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Syed Saim Ali

Syed Saim Ali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. There are a few brand posts without byline (, ) but none of them meet WP:SIGCOV. This article is an interview. BookishReader (talk) 15:15, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 15:16, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Fashion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:29, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:10, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Edgewood, Boone County, Illinois

Edgewood, Boone County, Illinois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Go far enough back and this is a passing siding on a now-gone C&NW line. It disappears from the tops for a while, but then of course in 2012 they put it back. But it's just a rail point. Mangoe (talk) 14:24, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Illinois. Shellwood (talk) 14:32, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Clearly just a rail point or possibly a flag stop on the interurban railroad that disappeared sometime between 1918 and 1953. Nothing found. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:25, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep - A testament to my general knowledge and experience, I have actually been to this place! It's very close to Cherry Vale Mall in Cherry Valley. There are many obscure villages and places on Wikipedia, but they (and this article) meets notability per WP:NSETTLEMENT. Vanguard10 (talk) 20:42, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: "I have actually been to this place" does not establish notability. Sources, please.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:09, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the recognition. However, please do not attack me because of an incidental comment that did not constitute the reason for the keep vote. Vanguard10 (talk) 18:28, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Additional information. The Belvidere Daily Republican, previously a daily newspaper, has 1,348 citations for Edgewood. https://www.newspapers.com/results/?keyword=Edgewood&publication-ids=3154

Vanguard10 (talk) 18:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep per evidence and testimony provided by Vanguard10. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 20:10, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Olakliz

Olakliz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see how this meets WP:GNG, at least the cited sources do not prove that: some are non-independent, and most do not provide the WP:SIGCOV we're looking for. A cursory search doesn't help at all. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:12, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Internet, and Nigeria. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:12, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:08, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Get to Drinkin'

Get to Drinkin' (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pretty clearly a non-notable as a musical recording. Not many sources other than Billboard, and author has no article. I nominated it for WP:A9, but that was challenged. Some searching shows that Zach John King is possibly notable, but there isn't much showing this song is. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 12:09, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:52, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

  The song has been climbing the Billboard charts as of late. It has chances of becoming more successful than it already is. It's also Zach John King's most well-known song and top song on the radio. Amusicng (talk) 16:00, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment - This probably doesn't help, but Zach John King will probably qualify for his own article sometime soon, if anyone wants to do the work. This song has gotten some notice for reaching the country charts: and his recent tour is getting some news coverage (though largely due to some cancellations): , . If/when he gets his own article, this song article could be redirected to there, or it could survive due to evidence of chart placement. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:36, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:07, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Macapagal family

Macapagal family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose deleting this article because it is way too short and does not have a clear explanation. Linkie320 (talk) 10:38, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

More specifically, the article is too broad and is not reliable, especially when talking about ancestors, which are not included in this article. Linkie320 (talk) 10:41, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Philippines. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:45, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
• Close, as proposer did not do WP:BEFORE, and WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. Please stop wasting our time. Howard the Duck (talk) 11:14, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep based on what's available. The minimum effort for families and deceased persons is to look for foreign language articles. Issues of completeness are an editorial issue, not for this forum. This family is well known in Philippines politics. Bearian (talk) 02:59, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
• Draftify The article is more like a stub and instead of deleting it outright, I believe we should help expand it. The article has a lot of potentials. Padreburgos2020 (talk) 19:31, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:06, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep per WP:Deletion is not cleanup - the proposer's issues are completeness, reliability, and broadness, all of which are things that can and should be improved as cleanup but which are not deletion criteria. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 20:11, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

2003 Route 60 vehicle shooting

2003 Route 60 vehicle shooting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This fails WP:NEVENT, which it must pass if it is to stay an article on Wikipedia. There are no results on Google Scholar and no relevant results on Google Books, which analyse the event more than the contemporary news reports. As for the news itself, Google News doesn't show much immediately relevant. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 16:05, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Islam, Middle East, Israel, and Palestine. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 16:05, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Roger Michalski

Roger Michalski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG/WP:NBIO All the sources I found are primary sources, press releases, and self-submitted speaker bio pages. I could not find any significant independent secondary coverage of the subject. Lone Wolf ^howl 08:19, 1 August 2026 (UTC) struck confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:46, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and United States of America. Lone Wolf ^howl 08:19, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Virginia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:35, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus.

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Keep. I’d like to contest this nomination and respectfully disagree with the assessment that no significant independent coverage exists.

Now I acknowledge that some of the initial sources were company adjacent, however, there is meaningful third-party coverage of Roger Michalski that demonstrates notability:

1. Trade press coverage

Inside Radio, an established broadcasting and media industry trade publication, quoted Michalski directly in an August 2025 news piece covering Salem Media’s business expansion as editorial coverage of an industry development. [https://www.insideradio.com/free/salem-media-pushes-beyond-radio-with-new-investments/article_40836415-bbfb-45b3-b4da-89ef3a276d88.html]

2. Independent interview

In March 2024, Michalski was featured as the subject of a dedicated interview on Liberty Ventures, an entrepreneurship platform hosted by Alexander McCobin, where he discussed his career trajectory and business philosophy, coverage entirely independent of Eagle Financial Publications. [https://www.libertyventures.xyz/content/top-financial-newsletter-editor-shares-the-ins-and-outs-of-the-business-roger-michalski]

3. Multiple SEC-filed press releases over a decade

As VP and Publisher of Eagle Financial Publications, a subsidiary of NASDAQ-listed Salem Media Group, Michalski has been the named spokesperson and quoted executive in multiple official BusinessWire press releases filed between 2015 and 2025, covering acquisitions of DividendInvestor.com, TradersCrux, Intelligence Report, Hilary Kramer’s services, George Gilder’s products, and Jim Fink’s investment services. These are verifiable public record documents. [https://investor.salemmedia.com]

4. Role and significance

Michalski has led Eagle Financial Publications for over 20 years, growing it into one of the largest financial newsletter operations in the U.S. with 230,000+ subscribers under a publicly traded parent company. His role is comparable to other publishing executives who have established Wikipedia articles. I’m actively working to strengthen the article’s sourcing and am open to feedback on how to improve it rather than deletion. Stubbing or a cleanup tag would be more appropriate here than outright deletion given the verifiable public record of this individual’s professional activities.

Greatsokratis (talk) 14:50, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - for lack of significant coverage. Interviews and press releases don't count towards notability. Bearian (talk) 02:53, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting despite nominator block since we do have one delete opinion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:03, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Air Jordan (airline)

Air Jordan (airline) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to List of defunct airlines of Jordan because there is very little significant coverage or information about this airline or its operations. Only 4 references with one of them seemingly self published, and I struggled to find anything else. Cubnorth (talk) 15:46, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Jordan. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 15:53, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:03, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

History of Chaotic Trading Card Game

History of Chaotic Trading Card Game (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Chaotic because of a lack of sources. I can not find anything on the Dracco Company, Draco Heads, Grolls & Groks, or Chaotic: Now or Never! I've already gone ahead and moved any relevant info to the Chaotic page, which focuses on the whole brand/franchise. This page on the card game history is overly detailed about in-game lore and lacks sources, and the few that it does have no longer work. So I propose we delete this page and make it a redirect to Chaotic of Chaotic Trading Card Game. Eric Schucht (talk) 15:36, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Comics and animation, Games, Toys, Companies, Denmark, and United States of America. Eric Schucht (talk) 15:36, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Doesn't seem to be anything to merge, it's very heavy WP:OR. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:11, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Martin Luther King Jr. Concert Series

Martin Luther King Jr. Concert Series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly written stub that could be expanded under separate articles. Little significant coverage as a whole beyond minor concerts. Go D. Usopp (talk) 15:08, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Ethnic groups, and New York. Go D. Usopp (talk) 15:08, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: this has been tagged as a potential GNG failure almost since its September 2012 creation (concurrently with the decline of a previous A3 tag). No opinion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:10, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Events-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:10, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

2026 Athens mid-air collision

2026 Athens mid-air collision (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The current sources in the article and those available through a search are not substantial enough to satisfy SIGCOV. Reports such as this from The Jerusalem Post spend much of the article covering the 2026 Greece wildfires, which isn't directly relevant to this accident and risks creating a WP:COATRACK. The helicopters were part of the rescue operation, but the accident was not caused by the wildfires itself. I think this should be merged into List of aviation accidents and incidents in Greece. 11WB 💬 14:48, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Environment, Aviation, Europe, and Greece. 11WB 💬 14:48, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Merge per nom Danners430 _{tweaks made} 15:02, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Merge per nom Cubnorth (talk) 16:23, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Merge per nom FaviFake (talk) 19:20, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Merge, does not warrant its own page. Geschichte (talk) 19:30, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Death of Tiran Fero

Death of Tiran Fero (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails WP:NEVENT. Firstly, and most concerningly, this gets no hits on Google Scholar or Google Books. The 'hits' on Google Books are just unrelated Italian books. The coverage on Google News ends soon after the event. There is no WP:PERSISTENCE in coverage, or any WP:LASTING effects. Most of the sources are Israeli, so it doesn't fulfill WP:DIVERSE or WP:GEOSCOPE. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 14:38, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Islam, Middle East, Israel, and Palestine. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 14:38, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete the car crash isn't notable, the "events" (for lack of a better term) around what happened to the body after appear to be more political then anything notable for wiki. There isn't much coverage of the event all these years later, I also don't see lasting critical, journalistic notice of the event. Oaktree b (talk) 14:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Ibrahim Salih Mohammed Al-Yacoub

Ibrahim Salih Mohammed Al-Yacoub (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Khobar Towers bombing#Culpability because WP:BLP1E. This guy's only notable for blowing up a building and nothing else.HerrHeulsuse (talk) 13:44, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Terrorism, Islam, and Saudi Arabia. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 13:44, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Merge per WP:BLP1E. I Would've done this boldly and see if anyone reverted it instead of nominating it. FaviFake (talk) 19:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Yemeni list of most wanted suspected terrorists

Yemeni list of most wanted suspected terrorists (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per the use-mention distinction and WP:SIGCOV. Could be merged into Terrorism in Yemen at most. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 13:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Terrorism, Lists, and Yemen. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 13:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

List of Rajya Sabha members (alphabetical)

List of Rajya Sabha members (alphabetical) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List of Rajya Sabha members already exists, so this is WP:DUP as a useless WP:FORK. The ctrl+f function already exists, and a table can be made on that page to arrange it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB|. If the reader wants all the Rajya Sabha members that've ever served, they can check the regional lists

A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to merge HerrHeulsuse (talk) 13:28, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politics, Lists, and India. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 13:28, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

List of princely states of British India (alphabetical)

List of princely states of British India (alphabetical) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List of princely states of British India already exists, so this is WP:DUP as a useless WP:FORK. The ctrl+f function already exists, and a table can be made on that page to arrange it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB|

A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to merge HerrHeulsuse (talk) 13:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: History, Politics, Lists, Asia, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Oman, India, and United Kingdom. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 13:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Shine Wunna Aung

Shine Wunna Aung (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Shine Wanna Aung because all information is the same as in the suggested target page. Robby (talk) 13:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Football, Asia, and Myanmar. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 13:33, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

List of cocktails (alphabetical)

List of cocktails (alphabetical) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List of cocktails already exists, so this is WP:DUP as a useless WP:FORK. The ctrl+f function already exists, and a table can be made on that page to arrange it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB and WP:NLIST HerrHeulsuse (talk) 13:13, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Lists. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 13:13, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

List of rivers of British Columbia (alphabetical)

List of rivers of British Columbia (alphabetical) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List of rivers of British Columbia already exists, so this is WP:DUP as a useless WP:FORK. The ctrl+f function already exists, and a table can be made on that page to arrange it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB and WP:NLIST HerrHeulsuse (talk) 13:13, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Lists, North America, and Canada. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 13:13, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:11, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

List of Turkish films (alphabetical)

List of Turkish films (alphabetical) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDB makes it so that lists that are WP:FORK'd from other lists, just to be arranged alphabetically, can't exist. This is WP:DUP, so WP:NOPAGE must be applied to it. Also, its function is made useless by the ctrl+f shortcut available on all computers HerrHeulsuse (talk) 13:09, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Film, Lists, and Turkey. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 13:09, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

List of populated places in Kosovo by Albanian name

List of populated places in Kosovo by Albanian name (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is entirely covered at List of populated places in Kosovo, as a column in its table. No reason for this to exist then, per WP:DUP, WP:FORK, WP:NOPAGE.

An entire page dedicated to a list of Kosovar places by their Albanian names also seems like a WP:POVFORK HerrHeulsuse (talk) 13:02, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography, Lists, Europe, Albania, Kosovo, and Serbia. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 13:02, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

List of populated places in Serbia (alphabetic)

List of populated places in Serbia (alphabetic) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDB, if the reader wants an encyclopedic list of Serbian localities, then can see List of populated places in Serbia HerrHeulsuse (talk) 12:59, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography, Lists, Europe, and Serbia. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 12:59, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Y1-class Melbourne tram

Y1-class Melbourne tram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Y-class Melbourne tram because of the fact that this article is about merely a subclass to another tram. There isn't much information on this article but it is well cited. LachlanTansey (talk) 12:48, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Australia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:50, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Merge per nominator's rationale. FaviFake (talk) 19:17, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Cliff Weitzman

Cliff Weitzman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No apparent notability outside of work on Speechify. See also the AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speechify Madeleine (talk) 20:44, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:55, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Oppose. Enough coverage in news sources and university websites to establish notability, albeit biased. - Otherwise (Antibacklog Aktion!) (talk?) 20:56, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Neither source is WP:INDEPENDENT from the subject. Madeleine (talk) 21:20, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Why is jta.org not independent? -2pou (talk) 14:03, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Oppose. Significant coverage in Forbes and Montana.edu. Entychologist (talk) 21:12, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Neither source is WP:INDEPENDENT from the subject, thus do not count toward notability. Madeleine (talk) 21:20, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Comment The montana.edu ref is written by the subject, in first person. Sesamehoneytart 01:17, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete // Weak Potential Merge I'm throwing WP:BIO1E and WP:PSEUDO into the mix as well, as the subject is only notable in the context of Speechify. I would support a merge of any relevant information to an article about Speechify if it survives its own deletion nomination, but I can't see justification of a standalone article. Sesamehoneytart 01:17, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:27, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep Meets the WP:GNG, the subject received coverage in reliable sources, including the Forbes 30 Under 30, and is the founder of a notable company that received recognition, and awards. Happypenguins82 (talk) 17:11, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

  Did the person receive awards or did the company? Per WP:PSEUDO, an individual is not notable if only known in connection with a single organization/event. I think the company has its own deletion discussion going on right now too. Sesamehoneytart 17:30, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  None of these are valid criteria to meet WP:GNG. Madeleine (talk) 07:59, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Not sure I would !vote keep, but there is a suitable WP:ATD via a merge or redirect to Speechify. If redirected, it would just follow the result of that discussion, be it a WP:G8 deletion or staying a redirect. -2pou (talk) 14:05, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. There is not significant coverage from independent reliable sources of this individual. The article does not pass WP:NBIO or WP:GNG. It is best not to redirect this article to Speechify because that article does not meet our notability guidelines either. Aneirinn (talk) 15:47, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep Passes WP:GNG and WP:BIO subject has mainstream notability coverage from source like Forbes. Staticspector (talk) 21:38, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 12:44, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Speechify

Speechify (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Sources currently used are either press releases, promotional, or otherwise not independent of the subject. See also the AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cliff Weitzman Madeleine (talk) 20:46, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Software-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:54, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Support. While the person who made it is notable, there are not enough independent sources. Entychologist (talk) 21:13, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• keep Despite the fact that the article is a stub and in need of expanding, The subject itself clearly meets WP:NCORP with good reliable sources including winning notable awards and the coverage of those. Happypenguins82 (talk) 16:42, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

  WP:NCORP is a very strict bar to meet. Which sources are you claiming meet the demanding criteria of WP:SIRS? I have seen not a single one that qualifies. Madeleine (talk) 08:02, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment Why is NCORP the bar here? This seems more like a product than a company. -2pou (talk) 14:19, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: The only thing that had made this a "company" article was the infobox. I have changed that to match the article written, which is a software product. WP:NCORP does not apply, and simply satisfying WP:GNG is sufficient. The Inc. and 9to5Mac pieces already provice multiple, reliable sources with significant coverage—while Inc. uses interview quotes, it provides much more of its own editorialized reporting. Additional sourcing WP:NEXISTS out there to establish notability, though: WILX, Tech Radar and Cybernews for example. -2pou (talk) 13:15, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. This product does not meet WP:NPRODUCT. Most of the sources are routine or promotional. Aneirinn (talk) 15:44, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

  While you might be able to say that about a lot of the sources in the article, the three pieces posted above are neither routine, nor promotional, as they discuss strengths/weaknesses and offer alternatives. The timing of some may coincide with updates, but that is when reviews get published, be them for films, software, books, video games, etc. In addition to those linked above, ZDNET reviewed independently as well (this is back under the Ziff Davis umbrella for reliable editorial oversight). -2pou (talk) 00:20, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep Passes WP:GNG with independent, verifiable sources providing WP:SIGCOV. Staticspector (talk) 21:26, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please note that WP:NPRODUCT is a section in WP:NCORP.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 12:43, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Rajiv Gandhi Arts and Science College

Rajiv Gandhi Arts and Science College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 12:43, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Education, Schools, Science, and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:51, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Ponnu Matriculation Higher Secondary School

Ponnu Matriculation Higher Secondary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP;GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 12:36, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Tamil Nadu. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:50, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Annai Vailankanni Arts and Science College, Thanjavur

Annai Vailankanni Arts and Science College, Thanjavur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 12:32, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Education, Schools, Science, and Tamil Nadu. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:33, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Kanchi Mamunivar Centre for Postgraduate Studies

Kanchi Mamunivar Centre for Postgraduate Studies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 12:30, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:32, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Dynasty International School

Dynasty International School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 12:29, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Haryana. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:31, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

2021 Eslöv school stabbing

2021 Eslöv school stabbing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor attack only subject to routine coverage, fails WP:NCRIME CookieCutta1 (talk) 12:24, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Schools, and Sweden. CookieCutta1 (talk) 12:24, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Events-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:31, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Gabriel Baum

Gabriel Baum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. No significant coverage of this executive in reliable sources. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 12:24, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and Businesspeople. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 12:24, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: United Kingdom and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:13, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Shahin Khalilli

Shahin Khalilli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article lacking in-depth secondary source coverage to meet WP:NBIO. Sources only about book publications and the books themselves. Yousiphh (talk) 10:33, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Science, Social science, and Azerbaijan. Yousiphh (talk) 10:33, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Comment The books are enough for a pass of NAUTHOR if there are some reviews of them. Unfortunately the only source that indicates it is a review, [7], leads somewhere else. The sourcing is bad, but most of the text comes from [1] so is "OK". I am not sure here, the language is a barrier to my finding reviews, maybe someone can do better in which case it will be a keep.
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Authors. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:13, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Rukmani Devi Jaipuria Public School

Rukmani Devi Jaipuria Public School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are primary, no indication of notability, Fails NSCHOOL. Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 10:23, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Delhi. Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 10:23, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Hope Hall Foundation School

Hope Hall Foundation School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources that are in any way reliable. Clearly not notable as well. Who am I? / Talk to me! / What have I done? 08:32, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Schools. Who am I? / Talk to me! / What have I done? 08:32, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Delhi. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:48, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Sabbac

Sabbac (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to List of DC Comics characters: S; While being somewhat re-occuring, Sabbac is not notable enough in their own right for WP:GNG. The only thing I can see is a study that mentions the movie version and how it portrays Arabs but it is not focused on Sabbac or Marwan Kenzari. CosmicMordecai (talk) 07:17, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Television, Comics and animation, and United States of America. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 08:08, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, Comics and animation, and United States of America. jolielover♥talk 08:09, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

List of administrative units of Pakistan by Human Development Index

List of administrative units of Pakistan by Human Development Index (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Economy of Pakistan because of WP:OVERLAP/WP:DUP which leads to WP:NOPAGE, and WP:SHORTTEXT

Similar nominations: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mexican states by population, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mexican states by homicides and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mexican states by life expectancy HerrHeulsuse (talk) 06:58, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Economics, Lists, and Pakistan. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 06:58, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• This is just 2 small tables backed , I don't understand why you nominated it? All of the pages you nominated should've been boldly merged first... FaviFake (talk) 19:24, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Frontier Climate

Frontier Climate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Author has admitted to LLM use (see WP:AINB § User:Global Donald) and article has clear WP:AISIGNS. LLMPROD repeatedly contested but I don't think the LLM text has been adequately cleaned up. As a separate issue, the vast majority of citations appear to be WP:CORPTRIV and I'm not convinced that the subject is notable. M kuhner (talk) 13:53, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Companies. M kuhner (talk) 13:53, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Delaware-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:40, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Environment, and Suspected AI-generated articles. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:47, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep This article covers the most notable investment coalition related to carbon dioxide removal-- after major tech companies such as Google and Microsoft, they are the single largest source of investment in the space.

I reviewed the sources and claims on the document, and have reviewed the framing/language use: this is consistent with over 5 years of monitoring these topics. Yes it included AI text at one point in history, before the policy about AI text was in place. This is a WP:SOFIXIT problem if you think the flavor of the text is not neutral -- however, all the sources and the claims check out for me (with 20 years of work on wiki, and over 7 years working on climate topics). Sadads (talk) 13:42, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• See the sector tracking data for investment in the space for my claim on single largest investor outside major tech. I have reread the article about 5-10 times now, and nothing stands out to me as either wrong, non neutral, or anything but factual claims backed by the sources, Sadads (talk) 13:50, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  I will respectfully ask that you look specifically for claims cited to source A but only verified by source B. This is a serious problem with recent LLM and it is difficult for a topic expert to catch because every claim seems reasonable. However "this is supported by A" when it is only supported by B is still a falsehood.

  Would also be interested in an analysis of how the large block of text on dollar values of investments is not WP:CORPTRIV, and what are the three best sources for notability. M kuhner (talk) 15:51, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  I just went back and double checked all the double or triple citations again (for at least the third time) they map to the specific factual claims.

  Moreover, the coalitions purchases/investments are covered in Bloomberg, Rueters, WSJ, and Anxios -- alongside ample industry or climate press.

  IDONTLIKEIT is not a reason to block the existence of an article, especially when it is at the center of an industry. I am not bullish on Carbon dioxide removal, nor particularly like Frontier as a company. BUT their investments are ubiquitous in this space, and includes a lot of money from major actors -- making it notable simply as from it significance as a funder. Sadads (talk) 14:30, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  There's no IDONTLIKEIT here. This is one of 600+ articles with significant contribution from an admitted LLM using editor and I'm just working my way through them. Thank you for checking the sources, that's extremely helpful. I will let the AfD run through in the hopes of getting more comments on notability, but I think we can consider the LLM issue dealt with. (I wasn't able to do this myself, because again, 600 articles.) M kuhner (talk) 19:00, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Appears to be WP:PROMO with over half the sources coming from the company itself. Agnieszka653 (talk) 19:13, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can we have a source analysis against NCORP?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:18, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 05:20, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Weak Keep but stubify. Refs. 16, 18, and (maybe) 14 are RS with significant coverage (but seem awfully close to churnalism to me). The rest of the sources, however, are obvious PR releases and/or blog posts which are completely unsuitable for notability. If all the specifics we can find on a company come from press releases, we can't really have a detailed article, but I do think WP:NCORP is just barely met. So a stub seems appropriate. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:58, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Niantic Spatial

Niantic Spatial (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Pokémon Go because coverage of Niantic Spatial is not independent of that company, and because most coverage of Niantic Spatial only talks about them insofar as they relate to Pokémon Go. WikipediholicRat (talk) 17:47, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Games, Companies, and Technology. WikipediholicRat (talk) 17:47, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

oppose- this is a perfectly fine content fork. They also don't develop Pokemon Go anymore, and I think it's reasonable to assume that merging them to Pokemon Go would become messier and messier as they develop independently of it. Yojo98 (talk) 18:13, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: this has been tagged as a potential NCORP failure since April, so this being a separate article may not be valid. I'm not as convinced Pokémon Go is the right target, though, given that Niantic Spatial is result of the sale of much of Niantic, Inc., to Scopely, and the immediate spinoff of the non-games portion–which means the connection between Pokémon Go (which stayed with Scopely) and Niantic Spatial is tangential at best, coverage notwithstanding. Perhaps a merge back to Niantic, Inc. would be logical or due (certainly moreso than Pokémon Go in this case), but I'm not giving a formal opinion on that. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:33, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

  thank you for the context, WC! I think a merge and redirect to Niantic, Inc could be appropriate, although it could get a little confusing with tense and clarity. I would defer to how other such spinoff merges has been conducted in the past, and continue to oppose merging to Pokemon Go Yojo98 (talk) 18:44, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Artificial intelligence and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:34, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

I oppose. If it redirects to any game it should be the one they actively develop, Ingress.

Niantic Spatial is its own company separate from Scopely and Pokemon Go. CollinstheClown (talk) 13:32, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Oppose Pokémon Go is not related to Niantic Spatial. Niantic has essentially been absorbed into Scopely since last year. nianticlabs.com redirects to Scopely. Niantic Spatial is a spinoff from the Scopely purchase in which Niantic's IP and other services were kept. My issue with the Niantic Spatial article has been it's not notable to be a separate article in its current form. – The Grid (talk) 15:55, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 07:35, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 05:19, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

BullionByPost

BullionByPost (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May fail WP:NCORP. Of sources referenced in article:
BBC - WP:CORPTRIV?
Telegraph - , seems good
Birmingham Post - , seems good
Birmingham Mail - this is not a separate source from the Post (owned by same company, same publication date, same author, substantially the same article)
Two sources about the same ad campaign, both niche trade publications ,
Business Desk - regional business press re: possibly notable award (the IoD has a Wikipedia article at least)
plus various links to non-notable awards...

Not having luck finding any better online; most are press release or trade publications, the rest seem to be passing mentions. ^purring_maggot (talk) 03:14, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom. ^purring_maggot (talk) 03:14, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of England-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:22, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep per nominator confirming 2, 3, 4, and 5 seem good - this is sufficient to meet NCORP. Jishara (talk) 14:02, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

But I'm curious, per GNG Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability. So The Telegraph and Birmingham Post would be just 2 sources right? Although I did just find more at The Business Desk about this company so that point's moot, there's 3 sources anyway. It seemed more borderline to me when I nominated, maybe I should withdraw... ^purring_maggot (talk) 01:23, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Speedy keep after finding more substantial coverage in one of the sources, I withdraw my nomination ^purring_maggot (talk) 23:08, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete as sources are WP:CORPTRIV or WP:TRADES or fail WP:CORPDEPTH due to limited independent analysis and a lot of direct quotes. I think nomination should continue despite nominator's withdrawal. It is a common business, not worth it have in any encylcopedia. ~2026-41539-18 (talk) 06:34, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  Hello - sorry first time doing this. I'm a customer of these guys and I would say its important its kept live. The industry is rife with scammers and bad actors - these guys have a long history and actually were first to do it online in UK. Something like WP I think helps people when doing research and avoiding falling into a scam trap.

  I'm happy to try and source more content and sources for the page if it helps, but I think it'll be a mistake to delete. Especially considering buying gold and silver is becoming more and more popular Mattav24 (talk) 08:30, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete I can't find anything else of note per the nominator--BBC is great so is the Telegraph but there isn't much else. Agnieszka653 (talk) 23:55, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:33, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability.

Concerning the 4 articles which were noted as being "good" above, the first article in the Telegraph relies entirely on information provided by the founder (also confirmed as such by Bloomberg) and fails ORGIND, the next fails for the same reason, the article in Business Live is a about the founder winning a non-notable "award" and the last is regurgitated PR, none meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:30, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 05:18, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Pichoy Airport

Pichoy Airport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable airfield stub with two primary sources. Propose redirecting to List of airports in Chile. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 17:19, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Chile. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 17:19, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep a WP:BEFORE would have prevented this to be filed. This makes national trips in Chile. --Bedivere (talk) 21:40, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

  Keep on what basis? The article fails GNG with precisely two sources, both of which primary. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 21:42, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per sources in Spanish Wiki. Khalitate (talk) 09:14, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep - The article can be expanded from the Spanish wikipedia, which has various sources covering the subject. I am Transat (give me some pings) 18:51, 25 July 2026

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: What sources? None of the keep votes are persuasive. Let's discuss sources or shall we just redirect ?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:01, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 05:15, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment. I'm calling this a comment rather than a vote, because really I won't lose any sleep whichever the decision is. However, unlike many of the airports on the List of airports in Chile this is a real airport, one of the most active in Chile, with frequent (daily, I think) flights between Valdivia and Santiago, not to mention other destinations. I suppose this adds up to a not very enthusiastic keep. Athel cb (talk) 08:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Igor Smirnov (chess player)

Igor Smirnov (chess player) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the notability guideline for people. The cited sources are either not independent of the subject, self-published, or basic statistics without significant coverage. A quick check for more didn't turn up anything promising. —TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 02:31, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Ukraine. —TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 02:31, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: "Igor Smirnov" is basically like "John Smith" in Russia. One of the most common forenames combined with one of the most common surnames. So google searches may not be all that helpful when it comes to establishing notability. Also grandmasters are usually considered notable. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 12:58, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: I'm able to find coverage of this guy in The Hindu. Haven't done a much deeper search. That being said, I expect sources covering him might be in Russian or Ukrainian, which limits my ability to find them. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:45, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: The Hindu of 2015 was more reliable than in 2026, and The Ram, although a student newspaper, is fairly reliable. Ping me if you find more. Bearian (talk) 02:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 06:51, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment. While grandmasters are generally notable, as far as I can tell he stopped competing once earning the title and now coaches and publishes training materials. It's very hard to write about such a person without veering into promotion. I couldn't find anything else in English. M kuhner (talk) 20:40, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 05:12, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Thunder Party

Thunder Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Sherman Chung because the album only has one reference and does not meet WP:NALBUM Majash2020 (talk) 01:15, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related AfD discussions. Majash2020 (talk) 01:15, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:01, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
  1. "鐘舒漫《Thunder Party》遺忘了的靚聲" [Sherman Chung's "Thunder Party": A Beautiful Voice Rediscovered]. New Monday (in Chinese). 2008-12-12. p. P194.

     The review notes: "當藝人又好，當歌手又好，最怕被人定型。一出道就被視為Rock女嘅Sherman，今次第3張專輯《Thunder Party》好不同，10首歌快慢各一半，發現Sherman唱慢歌，聲線好好，不計派台2首主打《野百合》同《紅磚》，另外2首中板慢歌〈Best Time》、〈眼睛不說謊〉特別考唱功，好嗌好聽嘅中板慢歌已經好難搵，Sherman嗆表現令人好意外。 Sherman亦不忘唱快板歌留fans，〈Shut Up〉帶有Jazz味，懶懶地講出烈女對現今男士嘅睇法，重有不得不提〈一心二用〉，以R&B演繹挑選男士嘅角度。 10首都好聽，但若嫌唱得未夠盡情，低音拉高音方面重有進步空間，和音有時亦太大，蓋過咗Sherman嘅高音。 （歡）推介歌 ： 〈一心二用〉、〈Shut Up〉"

     From Google Translate: "Whether as an entertainer or a singer, the biggest fear is being typecast. Sherman, who was labeled a "rock chick" right from her debut, takes a very different approach with her third album, *Thunder Party*. The 10-track album features an even mix of fast and slow songs, revealing that Sherman possesses a wonderful vocal quality for ballads. Beyond the two radio singles "Wild Lily" (野百合) and "Red Brick" (红砖), two other mid-tempo ballads—"Best Time" and "Eyes Don't Lie" (眼睛不说谎)—truly put her vocal skills to the test; such engaging mid-tempo ballads are rare finds these days, and Sherman’s performance is surprisingly impressive. She hasn't neglected upbeat tracks to keep her fans happy, either: "Shut Up" features a jazzy vibe, with a laid-back delivery expressing a strong-willed woman's views on modern men. Also worth mentioning is "Multitasking" (一心二用), which uses an R&B style to explore the perspective of choosing a partner. All 10 tracks are enjoyable, though if one were to nitpick, there is still room for improvement in terms of vocal abandon and the transition between low and high registers; the backing vocals are occasionally too loud, sometimes overpowering Sherman's high notes. Recommended tracks: "Multitasking" (一心二用), "Shut Up""

  2. "《Thunder Party》". East Touch (in Chinese). 2008-12-09. p. B92.

     The review notes: "還以為會是一張7成以上快歌的專輯，結果只佔約4成，的確是有點失望。 Sherman是少數能駕馭各種快歌的女歌手，拍子癒重適合她唱，所以難免會對她有所期待。先講慢歌，〈眼睛不說謊〉、〈紅磚〉、〈野百合〉、〈分手的記憶〉是節奏不錯的K歌，對Sherman沒有難度；〈買得到〉、〈Best Time》的R&B味道很濃，Sherman的節奏捉得準，很是難得；《八十誡》、《細細粒》、《一心二用》是她最出色的快歌，節奏強勁，咬字清晰，完全感覺到是她在玩弄拍子而不是要追著拍子來唱，很出色的作品，但不吐字不快的是不吐（Raymond）"

     From Google Translate: "I had expected an album where uptempo tracks made up over 70% of the content; as it turned out, they account for only about 40%, which was admittedly a bit disappointing. Sherman is one of the few female vocalists capable of mastering a wide range of uptempo songs—she particularly shines with heavy beats—so high expectations were inevitable. Regarding the ballads: "Eyes Don't Lie" (眼睛不说谎), "Red Brick" (红砖), "Wild Lily" (野百合), and "Memories of the Breakup" (分手的记忆) are catchy, sing-along-friendly tracks that pose no difficulty for her. "Can Be Bought" (买得到) and "Best Time" are steeped in R&B vibes; Sherman’s ability to nail the rhythm in these tracks is truly impressive. "Eighty Commandments" (八十诫), "Tiny" (细细粒), and "Multitasking" (一心二用) stand out as her finest uptempo numbers—featuring powerful rhythms and crisp enunciation, they showcase her playing with the beat rather than merely chasing it. These are outstanding tracks."

  3. "樂壇滾熱辣" [Hot Picks from the Music Scene]. Macao Daily News (in Chinese). 2008-11-27. p. E2.

     The review notes: "鐘舒漫 Thunder Party CD+DVD。首張專輯成績理想，新專輯一改風格，以慢歌為主。 《野百合》這首動聽的歌曲，贏得口碑，成功改變跳舞形象。其他收錄作品包括《八十誡》、《買得到》等。加送主打MV DVD一張。評分：80分 （成功轉型）"

     From Google Translate: "Sherman Chung – *Thunder Party* (CD+DVD) Following the impressive success of her debut album, Sherman shifts gears with this new release, focusing primarily on ballads. The melodious track "Wild Lily" (Ye Bai He) has garnered critical acclaim, successfully helping her move away from her previous "dance-pop" image. Other tracks include "Eighty Commandments" (Ba Shi Jie) and "Can Be Bought" (Mai De Dao). A DVD featuring the music video for the lead single is included. Rating: 80/100 (A successful transformation)"

  4. "鐘舒漫《Thunder Party》" [Sherman Chung's "Thunder Party"]. Hong Kong Economic Times (in Chinese). 2008-12-01. p. C3.

     The review notes: "鐘舒漫《Thunder Party》。鐘舒漫初出道時已憑奔放唱腔及歌路，唱出自家風格，新碟《Thunder Party》不再偏重快歌舞曲，快慢參半。主打歌《野百合》證明她駕馭抒情歌，感情力度十足；《紅磚》的高音演繹也算流暢穩定；唱回 groovy 的《買得到》，她更游刃有餘；而《八十誡》的有型任性、《細細粒》的性感媚惑，足見 Sherman 可塑性不俗。"

     From Google Transalte: "Sherman Chung – *Thunder Party*. Sherman Chung established a unique style right from her debut with her spirited vocals and repertoire. Her new album, *Thunder Party*, moves away from a heavy focus on uptempo dance tracks, offering a mix of fast and slow songs. The lead single "Wild Lily" (野百合) demonstrates her ability to handle ballads with deep emotional resonance, while her delivery of high notes in "Red Brick" (紅磚) is smooth and stable. She is even more at ease with the groovy "Can Be Bought" (買得到). Furthermore, the stylish, rebellious attitude in "Eighty Commandments" (八十誡) and the sultry allure of "Tiny" (細細粒) showcase Sherman's impressive versatility."

  5. "港女的公式化K歌" [The Formulaic Karaoke Songs of Hong Kong Girls]. Yunnan Information Daily (in Chinese). 2008-12-13. p. B14.

     The article notes: "钟舒漫 《Thunder Party》唱片公司：英皇 发行时间：11月27日乐坛二年级“半新人”钟舒漫在年底无惊无险实现“一年抱两”——同年第二张粤语大碟。钟舒漫的型女路线在第一张《乖女仔》已经设计好，前卫又不失健康，野性的节奏快歌成了钟舒漫最大的ico..."

     From Google Translate: "Sherman Chung – *Thunder Party* | Record Label: Emperor Entertainment Group (EEG) | Release Date: November 27. Sherman Chung—a "semi-newcomer" entering her second year in the music industry—smoothly achieved the feat of releasing two albums in a single year, with *Thunder Party* marking her second Cantonese full-length album of the year. The "cool girl" persona established with her debut album, *Good Girl*, remains intact here—striking a balance between edginess and a wholesome image—while high-energy, rhythmic tracks have become her signature style..."

  6. "鍾舒漫校服派對辣興酒客" [Sherman Chung's School Uniform Party Excites Clubgoers]. Oriental Daily News (in Chinese). 2008-12-07. p. C9.

     The article notes: "鍾舒漫（Sherman ）前晚舉行校服派對為新碟《Thunder Party 》造勢，好姊妹江若琳與師弟Square 、詩雅、吳浩康、張敬軒及緋聞男友張致恆（Steven ）亦到場支持，軒軒更送上大山祠花仔及耳機，又大樂她說唱歌，我更送上大騷。 ，所以一路都有買佢啲碟。Sherman 獻唱期間，Steven 充當攝影師為她拍照，大夥兒又齊齊跳上台為她伴舞，氣氛高漲，有酒客high 到走上台與Sherman 跳舞，在場保安即要求他退到台邊，大膽的Sherman 事後表示未有被嚇倒之餘，更大讚歌迷表現熱情。"

     From Google Translate: "Sherman Chung held a school uniform party the night before last to promote her new album "Thunder Party." Her good friend Elanne Kong, along with her juniors Square, Michelle Wai, Deep Ng, Hins Cheung, and her rumored boyfriend Steven Cheung, also attended to show their support. Hins even presented her with a flower and headphones from the temple, and happily told her to sing, adding that he even gave her a big show. During Sherman's performance, Steven acted as her photographer, and everyone jumped on stage to dance with her, creating a high-energy atmosphere. One patron got so excited that he went on stage to dance with Sherman, prompting security to ask him to move to the side of the stage. The daring Sherman later said she wasn't intimidated and praised the fans' enthusiasm."

  7. "鐘舒漫挑戰最高音域" [Sherman Chung Challenges Her Highest Vocal Range]. Oriental Daily News (in Chinese). 2008-11-26. p. C6.

     The article notes: "獲英皇力捧的鐘舒漫（Sherman ），新碟《Thunder Party 》今日推出，形象向來性感而且健康的Sherman ，封套方面有多個不同造型，包括性感小野貓、野性英倫Rock 女、派對潮女等，更大騷43 英寸長腿，盡顯其性感美。唱腔獨特的Sherman ，大碟除了拿手的勁歌外，更向難度挑戰，新歌《紅磚》高音位難度達至頂點，音樂人激贊Sherman 把高音位拿捏得非常準確。"

     From Google Translate: "Sherman Chung, a rising star heavily promoted by Emperor Entertainment Group (EEG), releases her new album *Thunder Party* today. Known for an image that is both sexy and wholesome, Sherman sports various looks on the album cover—ranging from a sexy "little wildcat" and a wild British rocker to a trendy party girl—while showing off her 43-inch legs to full effect. Beyond the high-energy tracks that are her specialty, Sherman—who possesses a unique vocal style—takes on a new level of difficulty with this album; the high notes in the new song "Red Brick" (*Hong Zhuan*) push her vocal limits to the max, earning high praise from musicians for her precise execution of the challenging high-register passages."

  8. "鍾舒漫出碟媽咪做推銷" [Sherman Chung released her album and her mother promotes it]. Oriental Daily News (in Chinese). 2008-11-27. p. C2.

     The article notes: "鐘舒漫（Sherman ）昨天推出新碟《Thunder Party 》，Sherman 刻意悉心打扮到電台接受訪問，更透露稍後將會跟朋友慶祝入行第三隻大碟的誕生。 Sherman 笑言媽咪是她新碟的最佳推銷員：「媽咪成日都買定好多隻碟，等啲auntie 朋友嚟就賣畀佢哋，又將我啲海報同報道周屋貼，要畀佢啲朋友知道她！Sherman 透露為新歌《紅磚》花了不少時間練聲，希望愈唱愈穩陣，而公司將於下月五日為她舉行盛大的新歌發布會，屆時會邀請圈中好友以校服look 出席派對，一齊開心慶祝。"

     From Google Translate: "Sherman Chung released her new album "Thunder Party" yesterday. Sherman dressed up carefully for a radio interview and revealed that she will be celebrating the release of her third album with friends soon. Sherman joked that her mother is the best salesperson for her new album: "My mom always buys a lot of CDs, and when her auntie friends come over, she sells them to them. She also puts up my posters and news reports around the house so her friends know about me!" Sherman revealed that she spent a lot of time practicing her new song "Red Brick," hoping to become more and more confident. Her company will hold a grand new song release party for her on the 5th of next month, where she will invite friends from the entertainment industry to attend the party in school uniforms and celebrate together."

  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Thunder Party to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

  Cunard (talk) 08:43, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 06:49, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 05:11, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

SugarDaddy.com

SugarDaddy.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub article consisting of a single sentence. TechnicalNewt (talk) 05:03, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Sexuality and gender, Internet, and Florida. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 06:33, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:49, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: by itself, simply being a single-sentence stub is not a reason for deletion, so long as there is still just enough to fend off A1 or A3 speedy deletion. However, this has been tagged as a potential NCORP failure since 2024, and all the way back in 2013 (when the article was created) there was a declined PROD on those grounds (and an even-quicker A7 decline, too, as there was enough of a claim of significance). I'll note that the user that placed the notability tag also reduced it to the stub in the first place on UPE grounds (a concurrent UPE tag has since been removed, albeit by a user that turned out to be a sock.) No opinion of my own, but there are potential reasons for deletion here, just not what the nominator brought up. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

AfterShip

AfterShip (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article seems entirely advertorial in nature, and does not appear to meet notability guidelines. Husskeyy (talk) 05:56, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related AfD discussions. Husskeyy (talk) 05:56, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:48, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Yes, this article is almost entirely promotional Alazar202 (talk) 09:00, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - no WP:ORGIND except for a bunch of WP:CORPTRIV. And pointless/insubstantial rankings. - Embyarby (talk) 04:00, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep - the article has been stable for 15 year, the four Techcrunch articles are over 15 years showing substantial coverage, there are plenty of international references and I found more with a fairly easy search. This is a terrible nomination but the article could use cleanup.

Source assessment table prepared by User:Example

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://techcrunch.com/2014/05/20/aftership-lands-1m-from-idg-accel-to-make-tracking-packages-less-nightmarish/		TechCrunch is a well-established technology news publication with editorial oversight.	Dedicated article discussing AfterShip's business, founders, funding, and product in significant detail.	✔ Yes
https://techcrunch.com/2020/06/24/aftership-makes-its-automated-shipping-api-postmen-available-for-free/		TechCrunch is considered a reliable secondary source.	Substantial article covering AfterShip's Postmen API, strategy, and market position.	✔ Yes
https://techcrunch.com/2021/04/22/e-commerce-tracking-platform-aftership-raises-66m-led-by-tiger-global/		Editorially reviewed technology publication.	Comprehensive article discussing AfterShip's Series B funding, growth, profitability, customers, and expansion plans.	✔ Yes
https://thenextweb.com/news/aftership-gets-seed-funding		The Next Web is an established technology publication.	Independent feature covering the company and its funding.	✔ Yes
https://www.techinasia.com/startup-weekend-global-champ-aftership-gets-seed-funding-after-demo-asia-encounter/		Tech in Asia is a respected publication covering Asian technology companies.	Substantial article discussing the company's history, funding, and founders.	✔ Yes
https://venturebeat.com/2012/03/02/76-startups-vie-for-attention-at-demo-asia/		VentureBeat is generally considered reliable.	~ Mentions AfterShip as part of broader conference coverage but provides limited discussion.	~ Maybe
https://www.scmp.com/lifestyle/arts-culture/article/1556997/just-how-useful-have-cyberport-and-science-park-been		South China Morning Post is a major newspaper with professional editorial standards.	~ Provides supporting coverage but is not primarily focused on AfterShip.	~ Maybe
http://vator.tv/news/2014-05-23-funding-roundup-week-ending-5-23-14		Independent startup news publication.	~ Routine funding roundup containing only brief coverage.	~ Maybe
https://www.startupweekend.org/	Primary source published by the organization presenting the award.	Reliable for verifying award results.	~ Does not establish notability because it is a primary source.	✘ No
https://globalstartupbattle.org/	Primary source published by the competition organizers.		~ Useful only to verify competition results.	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

~2026-42259-26 (talk) 06:51, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
  1. Yashima, Nobuyuki ヤシマノブユキ (2014-09-02). Ota, Ryoji 太田 良司 (ed.). "宅配便の配達状況をマメに知らせてくれるiPhoneアプリに惚れた！" [I'm in love with this iPhone app that keeps me updated on the delivery status of my packages!] (in Japanese). ASCII Media Works. Archived from the original on 2026-08-03. Retrieved 2026-08-03.

     The review notes: "競合アプリにはない便利機能が充実！ 追加済みの荷物の名称を変更したり、荷物の明細に“Notes”でテキストメモの追加。配達が完了した荷物の情報を、一覧とは別の“Archive”に保存できるなど、やりたいことをストレスなく行なえる！... 　唯一の弱点は“英語仕様”な点。例えばクロネコヤマトや日本郵便の問い合わせ電話番号が英語窓口のものだったり。伝票番号を入力すると宅配業者を自動でセットしてくれるんだけど、国内の宅配業者の伝票番号を“FedEx”と認識したり。追加した荷物の名称がプッシュ通知画面に表示されない点と合わせ、完璧な国内仕様に期待！"

     From Google Translate: "Convenient functions of Jiehe アプリにはない are full! Added "Notes" of "Notes" of the details of the "Character" and "Number of Charges" added. The information of the goods that has been distributed has been completed, the "Archive" of the "Archive" has been saved, the information has been saved, and the information has been saved! ... The only weakness is "English speaking". For example, Japan Post's phone number is Japanese Postal Service's telephone number. The ticket number is the automatic ticket number for the home delivery company, and the domestic home delivery service provider is "FedEx". We are looking forward to the addition of the name of the goods and the notification screen of the new items and the complete domestic official website!"

  2. Raphael, JR (2024-12-14). "This free app automatically tracks all of your incoming packages. A simple way to stay on top of shipping status? Yes, please! Meet AfterShip". Fast Company. Archived from the original on 2025-06-12. Retrieved 2026-08-03.

     The review notes: "Whether you’re the one shipping stuff or receiving it, the simplest and most effective way to keep track of all your package tracking is with a friendly free service called AfterShip. AfterShip is an app and a website that makes it as easy as can be to collect all your pending package tracking numbers in a single place—then see the status of each delivery anytime and optionally even get notifications about new delivery-related activity. ... What’s especially cool is that AfterShip will automatically save whatever info you give it and then continue tracking the associated deliveries on your behalf each time you open it back up again."

  ma
  3. Ren, Xiaojin (2018-09-03). "HK parcel tracker eyes mainland". China Daily. Archived from the original on 2026-08-03. Retrieved 2026-08-03.

     The article notes: "Hong Kong-based After-Ship, one of the world's largest online shipment- or parcel-tracking platforms, is preparing to enter the Chinese mainland market, home to a very large number of cross-border businesses and ever-growing e-commerce platforms. ... So, Chan decided to found AfterShip in 2011. The platform collects logistics information from across the world and allows online shop-owners and customers to track their parcels at one place, rather than going to different websites of carriers. E-commerce owners receive timely updates about their shipments from 470 carriers in over 200 countries through the platform, which they can share with their customers. Currently, the platform serves over 30,000 companies, including established e-commerce giants such as Amazon, eBay, Groupon and Etsy. Even many small and medium-sized enterprises use its services."

  4. Dudley-Nicholson, Jennifer (2021-09-29). "App to Date". The Daily Telegraph. Factiva DAITEL0020210928eh9t00021.

     The article notes: "AfterShip. Free, Android/iOS Getting just about anything delivered at the moment is challenging, making apps like AfterShip Package Tracker all the more important. This app can be asked to track incoming deliveries from more than 800 carriers worldwide, and will also show users updates as soon as they become available. Keen users can also ask the app to scrape details from a Gmail or Outlook inbox to identify and track packages automatically."

  5. "AfterShip Package Tracker". Computeractive. No. 688. 2024-07-17. p. 45. Factiva COMACT0020240717ek7h0000y.

     The review notes: "AfterShip Package Tracker Free Android. This excellent, ad-free app lets you track online deliveries from more than 700 carriers worldwide, including DPD, Evri, FedEx, UPS and Royal Mail. Either manually enter tracking numbers, or sync AfterShip with Gmail or Outlook to pull the details from emails, to get real-time delivery updates via push notifications and on a map. Best For Tracking package deliveries"

  6. King, Peter (2021-02-25). "Tech review: Shoppers wll love these great shipping apps". Newsday. Archived from the original on 2026-07-31. Retrieved 2026-08-03.

     The review notes: "AfterShip Package Tracker. (iOS, Android; free). The apps from FedEx, USPS and UPS, along with Amazon’s Shopping app for packages delivered by Amazon’s own fleet, will track the vast majority of deliveries for most people. But if you’re using a lesser-known shipper, this app can keep you posted. AfterShip has tracking information for more than 750 couriers. And yes, it also covers FedEx, USPS and UPS."

  7. Ngai, Man-wai 倪敏慧 (2014-07-08). "【創業辦】AfterShip商業奇才是怎樣煉成的？" [[Entrepreneurship Office] How Was the AfterShip Business Prodigy Forged?]. Apple Daily (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2014-09-16. Retrieved 2026-08-03.

     The article notes: "蘋果財經今日報道，包裹追蹤服務初創企業AfterShip經營有道，只花一年時間即已吸引著名基金IDG資本注資100萬美元（約780萬港元）。事實上，AfterShip今日略有小成，乃建基於公司「大腦」，合伙創辦人陳龍生（Teddy）過去重重挫折，將他鍛鍊成一個極具商業頭腦的人才。"

     From Google Translate: "Apple Finance reported today that package tracking service startup AfterShip is well-run and has attracted an investment of US$1 million (approximately HK$7.8 million) from well-known fund IDG Capital in just one year. In fact, AfterShip has achieved a small success today, which is based on the company's "brain". Co-founder Chen Longsheng (Teddy) has experienced many setbacks in the past, which has trained him into a very business-savvy talent."

  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow AfterShip to pass Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria, which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject".

  Cunard (talk) 07:25, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 04:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Studio 107.5

Studio 107.5 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be mostly LLM-generated, doesn't seem to be notable, and not in-line sourced except a list of references, of which none seem to be reliable. SonOfYoutubers (talk) 03:43, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related AfD discussions. SonOfYoutubers (talk) 03:43, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete. I agree with the diagnosis of LLM: The exact reasons for its closure are not widely detailed, but changes in media landscapes, evolving listener habits, and strategic decisions by media groups can lead to such closures or format changes is typical LLM waffle when it doesn't know something. M kuhner (talk) 05:51, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

it's Axel1382004 (talk · contribs) , blocked as a sock but likely needs all their edits and creations cleaned up Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 15:23, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Suspected AI-generated articles and Sweden. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:50, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Lots of WP:AISIGNS requiring erasure. A major metro radio station would be notable with the right sourcing, and someone with more specialty in Sweden might want to try their hand. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 19:09, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

ENFJ

ENFJ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Myers–Briggs Type Indicator because it does not make sense to have a standalone article about one of the sixteen personality types; anything useful here should be covered in context in the main article. This article has been an orphan for many years. I'm not simply going ahead and redirecting it because previous attempts to redirect it in 2023 and 2025 were reverted. Dreamyshade (talk) 03:03, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related AfD discussions. Dreamyshade (talk) 03:03, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• - Based on the very poor quality of sources, I would consider deletion, instead. There is very little here worth merging. Grayfell (talk) 03:23, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

  Valid, I support deletion as well. Dreamyshade (talk) 14:46, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. This is a poorly-sourced POV-fork of the main article. Wikipedia should not be indulging woo. Any well-sourced material about "EMFJ" (should it exist, which is unlikely) or any of the other 16 MBTI combos can be included in the main article. Bon courage (talk) 07:57, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per above. FaviFake (talk) 19:19, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Jakhi Isaiah

Jakhi Isaiah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for living persons under WP:BLP1E. While the article covers multiple related criminal charges (minor vandalism in 2024 and more serious arson in 2025), the subject's entire public profile is entirely derivative of these police investigations and subsequent court proceedings. Prior to these legal events, the subject possessed no independent, sustained notability. Individuals who become notable solely through a localized criminal charges do not warrant standalone biographies. Any relevant details should instead be redirected or covered within articles about the related protests. —Biosketch (talk) 02:59, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and Crime. —Biosketch (talk) 02:59, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:50, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

After having altered content and removed relevant, sourced contextual information in a manner that appears editorial, Biosketch still notes above that there are at least two events with federal investigations associated with this individual. They both have significant coverage in RS, and the manhunt and trial are generating their own coverage in RS. WP:BLP1E is for subjects known for one event. The topic satisfies WP:GNG per RS currently cited in the article, provided below:

• "NYPD search for man they say is linked to police vehicle fires in Brooklyn". ABC7 New York. 2025-06-18. Retrieved 2026-08-05.
• Frances, C. (2026-08-03). "NYPD Used High-Tech Surveillance to Find Gaza Paint Splatter Protester, Docs Show". The Intercept. Retrieved 2026-08-05.
• "Brooklyn man pleads guilty to setting fire to 11 NYPD vehicles". ABC7 New York. 2026-04-09. Retrieved 2026-08-05.
• Associated Press (2026-04-08). "Brooklyn activist pleads guilty to setting fire to 11 NYPD vehicles". NBC New York. Retrieved 2026-08-05.
• Frances, C. (2026-08-03). "NYPD Used High-Tech Surveillance to Find Gaza Paint Splatter Protester, Docs Show". The Intercept. Retrieved 2026-08-05.
• Williams, Nicholas (2025-06-25). "NYPD offers $30K reward for info on suspect in torching of Brooklyn cop cars". New York Daily News. Retrieved 2026-08-05.
• Moses, Dean (2025-06-25). "Brooklyn arsonist wanted: NYPD ups reward to $30,000 for capture of suspect who set police vehicles ablaze | amNewYork". www.amny.com. Retrieved 2026-08-05.
• "Man charged with torching 10 NYPD vehicles in Brooklyn lot". Newsweek. Retrieved 2026-08-05.
• Nerkar, Santul (2025-07-22). "Brooklyn Activist Charged With Arson in Torching of 10 Police Vehicles". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2026-08-05.
• "Drop the Charges Against Jakhi McCray". The Barricade. Columbia University Apartheid Divest. 2025-08-04. Retrieved 2026-08-05. (primary source)
• "Man pleads guilty to setting fire to multiple NYPD vehicles last year". News 12 - Bronx. Retrieved 2026-08-05.

إيان (talk) 14:39, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• delete doesn't rise to the level of criminal notability, not meeting CRIME. The career otherwise is rather routine. BLP1E seems to apply as the nom suggests. Oaktree b (talk) 14:44, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

  Could you explain how it is that you see two separate incidents (one in 2024 and one in 2025) as a situation in which BLP1E seems to apply as the nom suggests? إيان (talk) 19:25, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep - by definition someone known for two events with two distinct reports can't be a BLP1E. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 20:09, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

S.W. Snowden Elementary School

S.W. Snowden Elementary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose deleting due to lack of notability of this elementary school. The only notable sources covering this school talk about the closure of it last year, filtering to before ~2018 yields no notable coverage.

PS: This is my first time doing an AfD, so I hope I did this correctly! Thanks all. Toaast (talk) 02:09, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related AfD discussions. Toaast (talk) 02:09, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education and North Carolina. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:30, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

delete The article fails WP:NSCHOOL Randombrian45 (talk) 02:37, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

The Sudans

The Sudans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was created in 2014, about three years after South Sudan became independent from Sudan. It presents the combination of these two countries as a "region", but that region is no more than the former Sudan. The sources do not support the presentation of this area as a region outside of that, and I can't find much significant treatment on it as a distinct region elsewhere.

There are obvious links between the two neighbouring countries, but these should be covered at South Sudan–Sudan relations. The current content is a WP:SYNTH of the topics from the two modern countries, or coverage of pre-2011 Sudan. More importantly, there was historically a wider Sudan region, but it was not this one. We have Sudan (region), which redirects to Sudanian savanna. This regional use is rare in modern times, but does turn up in historical writing, for example being used in the title of Islamization of the Sudan region, and of course French Sudan.

There does not seem to be much here to merge, the content is short and much was taken from existing articles anyway. As for the title, it does match a book; I don't know if the book is notable, but it does dominate prominent google hits for this term. Otherwise, the term might be useful for someone searching for information about the multiple Sudans, including the French one, so I would not be opposed to a redirect to Sudanian savanna (perhaps changed if an article on the historical region/term is ever created). CMD (talk) 02:04, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Mali, South Sudan, and Sudan. CMD (talk) 02:12, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete "the Sudans" is not a commonly used regional term. Even if it was, I doubt it would be notable due to the use-mention distinction. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 06:22, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Mccapra (talk) 08:38, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

United States national motto

United States national motto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting/merging to In God We Trust because there the In God We Trust article covers all information in this one and there isn't a reason for two articles about the United States national motto. Bennett27 (talk) 02:01, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: History, Law, Politics, Religion, and United States of America. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 06:30, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose, the U.S. national motto is a stand-alone topic no matter what other article exists. It has its own history aside from the wording, and has existed as a notable topic before the wording was officially agreed to by the nation's Congress. Note that there is no "merge" tag placed on the target article. Randy Kryn (talk)

List of Philadelphia Phillies turn back the clock games

List of Philadelphia Phillies turn back the clock games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The Phillies and Mariners are the only two teams from what I can see that have their own pages with lists of Turn Back the Clock games. To be honest, I really don't see a point to this page or any real meaningfulness that it provides. Teams wear throwback uniforms all the time now, and not to mention on top of that City Connect uniforms too. The Phillies themselves wear their powder blue throwbacks from the 1970s/80s every Thursday home game, it's not like we are going to document every game for that. Red0ctober22 (talk) 00:49, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Baseball and Pennsylvania. Red0ctober22 (talk) 00:49, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Useless trivia and it looks like it hasn't been updated in ages. Spanneraol (talk) 01:20, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Comment - I'm going to think about this one a bit more, but as a point of record, this article only documents game where both teams wore throwbacks, not just any time the Phillies wore a throwback alternate. True throwback vs throwback matchups happen much less often than every week.

I do think that the article title is poor - AFAIK the MLB hasn't used the Turn Back the Clock branding in some time. Yojo98 (talk) 01:24, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

That is true and I did misspeak there, although I think it is inaccurate for the upcoming Field of Dreams game to be included on here (even though both teams will be wearing throwbacks), as there is no indication at all that it this game is being done under the branding of "Turn Back the Clock", and no prior edition of the Field of Dreams game ever used that branding either. Red0ctober22 (talk) 01:37, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Could Turn Back the Clock (baseball) cover this information? SenshiSun (talk) 01:35, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

I just don't really think it's necessary to cover every single Turn Back the Clock game. That page you mentioned provides a good overview of the promotion and everything, and I think it is sufficient as-is. Red0ctober22 (talk) 01:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

I think you're right about that. Voting Delete. SenshiSun (talk) 02:39, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Events-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:29, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Gallatin National Forest

Gallatin National Forest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Custer-Gallatin National Forest because the forests have been combined since 2014

This proposal also nominates Custer National Forest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Unknown Lifeform | Talk 00:16, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Environment, Geography, United States of America, and Montana. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 06:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Member of the People's Assembly (Syria)

Member of the People's Assembly (Syria) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging this page into People's Assembly (Syria) because the content heavily overlaps with it, and there is no need to keep the two topics separate. Additionally, the infobox is misused here, as it is designed specifically for single-person offices. Sakiv (talk) 00:12, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Syria. Sakiv (talk) 00:12, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

  I strongly object to merging this article into People's Assembly (Syria).

  This article covers a distinct subject that carries its own independent encyclopedic value and historical/procedural significance. Merging it would lead to an overly long main article and diminish the depth of information available on this specific topic.

  I am actively expanding the content with additional reliable third-party sources and references to firmly demonstrate its standalone notability. I kindly request keeping this as an independent page. David076 (talk) 05:20, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

  I am actively working on improving this page and adding reliable references to prove its standalone notability. Since I am dedicated to making this article better, I would highly appreciate it if experienced editors could help or guide me in expanding and formatting it properly, rather than merging or deleting it. David076 (talk) 05:22, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

I also object to merging this article as well, though it's mostly regarding keeping consistency with other similar articles (e.g. Member of Parliament, Lok Sabha). Caltine (talk) 07:20, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:30, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
• Merge selectively per nominator's rationale. Immense WP:OVERLAP and also WP:SHORTTEXT. If other pages are so small and overlap so much as Caltine says, those should be merged as well, not the opposite. FaviFake (talk) 19:15, 8 August 2026 (UTC)