Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Yesterday

if page isn't updating.

Guide to deletion

Imagination Games

Imagination Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company appears to fail WP:NCORP. Shane Yeend could be a notable entrepreneur but this article has virtually no content worth saving. IgelRM (talk) 23:53, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and Australia. IgelRM (talk) 23:53, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Hong Kong national under-23 football team results

Hong Kong national under-23 football team results (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NLIST, no evidence that these have been discussed as a group or set by independent, reliable sources. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 20:56, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Football, Lists, and Hong Kong. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 20:56, 22 July 2026 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 21:11, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

This article follows established Wikipedia precedent for national football team results pages (including U-23 levels), which are routinely kept as they compile verifiable match data for a notable team. The Hong Kong U-23 side has a documented history in major competitions such as the Asian Games and AFC U-23 qualifiers, with coverage from official AFC sources and media. WP:NLIST is satisfied because the team's overall competitive record is notable via its main article; dedicated results lists aid readers without requiring every match to have standalone independent coverage as a "set." Deletion would fragment useful, well-sourced content. Afootballfaninhk (talk) 15:49, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - there is plenty of recent consensus that these kind of articles are non-notable and fail LISTN, see them listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Deletion archive#July 2026. GiantSnowman 18:20, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per GiantSnowman. Catfurball (talk) 16:27, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Hong Kong national under-23 football team#Results and fixtures as WP:ATD. Jumpytoo Talk 04:12, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Hong Kong national under-23 football team#Results and fixtures (with the history preserved under the redirect) per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion. A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article. A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future. Cunard (talk) 08:20, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete same as the other football AfDs today. Samuelshraga (talk) 11:53, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, since this violates WP:NOT, there is no point to preserving the edit history. Geschichte (talk) 06:26, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion says:

  If editing can address all relevant reasons for deletion, this should be done rather than deleting the page. This includes the implementation of any of the named alternatives to deletion listed below, such as redirection and merging.

  Redirecting can address the reason for deletion. There are benefits to retaining the page history. Hong Kong national under-23 football team#Results and fixtures contains the results from 2025 and 2026, while Hong Kong national under-23 football team results contains the results from 2010-2025. It is useful to preserve the page history since the results section has information about which teams the team played against and when and where they played. This information can be used to refine search queries on Google and research databases to find sources that provide more information about the games, which can then be added to Hong Kong national under-23 football team. Cunard (talk) 10:24, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

  The issue is that the underlying data is not notable. GiantSnowman 08:24, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 23:37, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Readying The Museum

Readying The Museum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page does not meet WP:GNG and has major sourcing issues. Redvelvetvanilaaaaaaaaa (talk) 14:18, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and Organizations. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:46, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:46, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete in lieu of ATD which I am unable to identify. I am familiar with this initiative, and while I admire their work it does not appear that they attained notability. Maybe there's a social justice in the arts ATD available? Star Mississippi 02:29, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

• Merge to Arizona State University Art Museum Keep - I think it is likely notable per in-depth significant coverage in these three independent reliable sources: New York Amsterdam News [1]; ArtNews[2]; The Art Newspaper[3] (it's behind a paywall (subscription required) however I was able to read the full, comprehensive article). If the article does not pass this AFD, then an alternative to deletion (ATD) would be ASU Art Museum, the institution that founded this initiative. A sentence or two could be added to the ASU Art Museum article based on the above sources. Netherzone (talk) 15:18, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. The strongest would-be source is most likely repackaged WP:PRESSRELEASE material, with much of the content uncritical quotes from the founder and content from the organization's website. Longhornsg (talk) 19:38, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
• Merge selectively to Arizona State University Art Museum. A sentence or two at this target, as Netherzone suggests, would give due weight to that project without the need to establish independent notability. Owen× ☎ 07:27, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:45, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Merge to Arizona State University Art Museum as a reasonable alternative to deletion. – The Grid (talk) 17:29, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 23:35, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Abendgymnasium

Abendgymnasium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to [[4]] because this is just a German version of a night school and only conceptually distinguishable at all because of the tracking system in German secondary education (meaning that, e.g., people who attended lower-track high schools might want to attend a night gymnasium to earn an abitur, in a way that has no exact anglosphere equivalent). The Night School article already contains a section for Italy, which also has a (semi-)German-style school tracking system and therefore night schools that work basically the exact same way as those described in this article, so moving this there as well--and probably placing both it and the existing Italian content under broader section like "Night Gymnasium" instead of segregating them nationally--seems appropriate.

Note that there are also currently articles for [[5]] and [[6]]; Abendrealschule should probably just be folded into a brief note under "Evening Gymnasium" that similar evening schools also exist for lower-track qualifications; Abendhauptschule seems entirely extraneous and should probably just be deleted entirely. Ottokarhochman (talk) 10:25, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Germany. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 10:42, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. I see no problem whatsoever with this article. It's a recognised class of school. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:04, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
• Merge completely, with no loss of information, to Evening school as proposed, and convert this to a redirect (Ottokarhochman, you might consider wiki-linking wikipedia articles with double square brackets, when referring to them). If the Evening school article were to become too long, it would be perfectly okay to split them out into separate articles, but as things stand, the Evening school article is a stub just crying out to be converted into an encyclopedic survey of evening-school educational systems across the English-speaking world. The level of detail present in Abendgymnasium would fit there very well. One has to think about reader experience: is it better to have hundreds of mini-articles each failing to put the subject in context, or summarise a lot of related material in one place so the reader gets an overview? Elemimele (talk) 08:17, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 12:08, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 23:35, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Contemporary imprints of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion

Contemporary imprints of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge into The Protocols of the Elders of Zion per WP:OVERLAP. This article substantially duplicates material that belongs in the parent article and does not establish a sufficiently distinct scope to justify a standalone spinout. The scope is also unclear. It's not obvious what qualifies as "contemporary" or how the topic is meaningfully separated from the main article's coverage of the document's influence, history and continued circulation. Merging the useful content into the parent article would improve coherence and avoid unnecessary WP:SPINOFFs. Longhornsg (talk) 23:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, History, and Judaism. Longhornsg (talk) 23:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Merge per nom. Definitely reads like it should just be another section of the main article for that text. The split is unnecessary LincolnMagnus (talk) 01:51, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Dhubri Girls' College

Dhubri Girls' College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:39, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Assam. Shellwood (talk) 22:42, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Dhubri#Colleges, where it's listed, as an ATD-R. Additional searches yielded some ROUTINE and TRIVIAL reportage but nothing with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:29, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Rupayatan

Rupayatan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:38, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Gujarat. Shellwood (talk) 22:41, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: Didn't find anything with SIGCOV in additional searches to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:26, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Government College for Girls, Hisar

Government College for Girls, Hisar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:38, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Haryana. Shellwood (talk) 22:40, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: Additional searches yielded some ROUTINE and TRIVIAL reportage but nothing with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:24, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Government Polytechnic, Hisar

Government Polytechnic, Hisar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:38, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Haryana. Shellwood (talk) 22:40, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: Just another ROTM institute. Didn't find anything with SIGCOV in additional searches to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:24, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Smt K A Vora Primary School

Smt K A Vora Primary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:38, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Gujarat. Shellwood (talk) 22:40, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Ranasan Town#Schools, where it's listed, as an ATD-R. Just another ROTM institute. Didn't find anything with SIGCOV in additional searches to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:21, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Unary coding

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Unary coding
• Articles for deletion/Unary coding (2nd nomination)

Unary coding (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to unary numeral system because it is listed as another term for the same thing in the article and appears to be such. Knowswheretheirtowelis (talk) 20:59, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Mathematics. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:30, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose. The use of a trailing 0 in unary coding makes it have significantly different properties, in terms of coding theory, from unary numerals. In particular, unary coding forms a prefix code but unary numerals do not form a valid code at all. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:42, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close. Per below admission that this was submitted accidentally. Please use Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unary coding (2nd nomination), which has the proper rationale. (non-admin closure) Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:30, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Unary coding

Unary coding (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging because Knowswheretheirtowelis (talk) 20:52, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Mathematics. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:54, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Knowswheretheirtowelis, merge to where? Thanks. Ldm1954 (talk) 20:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

I submitted this by accident the properly filled out page is here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unary coding (2nd nomination) Knowswheretheirtowelis (talk) 21:01, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

this was published accidentally go here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unary coding (2nd nomination) Knowswheretheirtowelis (talk) 21:09, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

LC Sign

LC Sign (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ordinary WP:MILL company. The sources are non WP:RS and WP:ORGIND. Fails WP:NCORP. MitYehor📘^^talk 19:40, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Products, Technology, and China. MitYehor📘^^talk 19:40, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Andre Relis

Andre Relis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose draftifying because this article is not ready for the mainspace but I believe its subject is potentially notable for their involvement in multiple notable projects as producer per WP:CREATIVE if properly sourced. Se7enNationArmy2024 (talk) 19:30, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Film, United States of America, and California. Se7enNationArmy2024 (talk) 19:30, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

New Government Polytechnic, Patna-13

New Government Polytechnic, Patna-13 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pure promo page on a polytechnic in India. Of the four sources: 1 is missing; 2 does not appear to be relevant; 3 is a dead link and 4 is irrelevant. Page was draftified on July 26, moved back to main without change on July 30. Any of delete, redraftify or WP:HEY rewrite (if notability can be shown) are OK, the current version is an inappropriately written advert. Ldm1954 (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, India, and Bihar. Ldm1954 (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

It is public institute and recognised by peoples interest of notice in public domain. Amarjeetkr97 (talk) 19:08, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Just another ROTM institute. Didn't find anything with SIGCOV in additional searches to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:20, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Atomic Energy Central School

Atomic Energy Central School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:54, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:16, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: Since it's a school chain, it should be judged by WP:NORG and it fails to meet the same. Found nothing with CORPDEPTH in additional searches to warrant standalone notability. There are few ROUTINE coverages about one particular branch, but nothing about the chain of schools in general. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:48, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: I've got no opinion on this matter, but I have given notice to two Wiki Projects that might not have been given any notice, which I believe would be unfair. Bearian (talk) 02:08, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
• Merge to Atomic Energy Education Society, which administers the schools. Arguably that isn't notable either, but it can also be further merged to Department of Atomic Energy. regards, TryKid ^{[dubious – discuss]} 03:11, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 17:40, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Chinbaatar Solongo

Chinbaatar Solongo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails in WP:GNG / lacks WP:SIGCOV. Svartner (talk) 16:57, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and Mongolia. Svartner (talk) 16:57, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Taylor White (goalkeeper)

Taylor White (goalkeeper) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails in WP:GNG / lacks WP:SIGCOV. Svartner (talk) 16:53, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and Guyana. Svartner (talk) 16:53, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment – A redirect to List of Guyana women's international footballers is a valid WP:ATD. Svartner (talk) 17:00, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Hachemi Boussaâda

Hachemi Boussaâda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails in WP:GNG / lacks WP:SIGCOV. Svartner (talk) 16:38, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Algeria. Svartner (talk) 16:38, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Canada Forum for Nepal

Canada Forum for Nepal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not see sufficient evidence that the organization meets WP:NORG or WP:GNG. The article is largely a promotional history and activity list, with limited independent reliable sourcing and heavy dependence on primary/organizational material. The article also reads more like an organizational profile or activity report than an encyclopedic entry. Its language is frequently promotional and non-neutral ("significant amount of contribution", "most prominent", "bridge", "most profound requirement"), which further supports concerns about its suitability in its current form. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:35, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Nepal, and Canada. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:35, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Han Sang-ryong

Han Sang-ryong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to South Korea at the 1948 Summer Olympics#Wrestling because the subject fails to meet the WP:GNG. The only reference is a database, and all I could find elsewhere was results on unrelated people with the same name. Let'srun (talk) 16:31, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, Wrestling, and South Korea. Let'srun (talk) 16:31, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Irma Aguayo

Irma Aguayo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ARTIST. Created in 2019 for a class by SP account. Pushed into main space without proper review. Citations are for specific historical events or person depicted, not the work of the artist. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 16:12, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related AfD discussions. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 16:12, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:46, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Vaggelis Mantzas

Vaggelis Mantzas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested draftify. Young footballer with no professional appearances to date. He might be notable in the future but I can't see any sign of passing WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC at this moment. The Sport FM Patras and Match News sources are identical and neither contain significant coverage. It is merely a copy and paste of a press announcement by Mantzas' club, so it's not truly independent either. Patra Goal is another transfer announcement with weak coverage only. This is just a squad list mention. Pelop is only a trivial mention. No decent coverage under "Ευάγγελος Μάντζας" or "Βαγγέλης Μάντζας". Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:00, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Greece. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:00, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:01, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment - similar case to Theodoros Georgopoulos, Christoforos Papaefthymiou and Nikos Daramouskas Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:06, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 20:09, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Brother Love (rock musician)

Brother Love (rock musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Claims are reaching a non-notable chart and working with non-notable musicians. Could not independently corroborate claim of television commercials or airtime on Podsafe Music Network, which does not appear to be a notable claim either. Could not find any reviews of the albums. The only result on newspapers.com for "Larry Florman" + "Brother Love" was a Tennessean blurb about him copyrighting the name. HER & Kings County does not appear to be notable either. The article has been in deplorable condition since 2005, suggesting this is not a notable musician. Ten Pound Hammer (they/them) • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:41, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, Music, and New York. Ten Pound Hammer (they/them) • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:41, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Mozn AI

Mozn AI (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. The sources are announcements of partnerships or funding rounds (fail WP:CORPTRIV), or are substantially based on interviews and statements by the officers of the company (fail WP:CORPIND). ~ A412 ^talk! 15:08, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Artificial intelligence, and Saudi Arabia. ~ A412 ^talk! 15:08, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Matthew Talbot Hostel

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Matthew Talbot Hostel
• Articles for deletion/Matthew Talbot Hostel (2nd nomination)

Matthew Talbot Hostel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to 420 Kent Street because these articles contain content that WP:OVERLAPs with each other, it would make the former article much stronger in its content as a result. Reading all information about a topic that was hosted in a former building would be much better than navigating to a different article. Qwerty123M (talk) 12:55, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related AfD discussions. Qwerty123M (talk) 12:55, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Oppose merge - I think it'd be weird organization-wise to have the content of the Hostel on the address page when the hostel was only there from 1938 to 1953 (15 years) and has spent the rest of the time since (73 years) at a different, also notable (with its own wikipedia article) location. Much cleaner to keep it seperate. Jishara (talk) 14:15, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Oppose merge Matthew Talbot Hostel is well-known in Sydney as a shelter for homeless men, regardless of its location. It is a notable and historic institution and should be retained in its own article. The old church, currently in the media because of protests, should also have its own article as the Kent St address as it currently stands.LPascal (talk) 02:42, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Oppose. Notable at other locations. Doctorhawkes (talk) 02:18, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Merge selectively as suggested and as reasonable in these circumstances. I am also concerned about the confusion of the word hostel to mean homeless shelter, which might be used currently in Australia, but is an archaic connotation in North America and other countries, where hostel means youth hostel. If it's kept, a head note should be added to clarify that issue. Bearian (talk) 19:48, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  P.S. An old high school friend, Boaz Yakin, has done equally bad things for the understanding of the term hostel; see Hostel (disambiguation)#Media. Bearian (talk) 19:50, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 15:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Avaada Group

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Avaada Group
• Articles for deletion/Avaada Group (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Avaada Group (3rd nomination)

Avaada Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP as a WP:ROTM org conducting its business in a run of the mill manner 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 06:22, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, Environment, and India. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 06:22, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: both of the prior nominations ended in deletion, and if that happens yet again it might be time to bring out the salt. (On the other hand, the last nomination a few months ago was dominated by users since blocked for UPE and/or socking, a reminder that the disruption in this topic area over what articles should exist goes both ways.) No opinion beyond that. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:16, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: Dosent have any significance to the article per WP:SIGNIF, also consider salting the article also. ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 09:31, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep – Passes WP:NCORP, as the company has received in-depth coverage in multiple analyst reports such as [7], [8], [9], [10] provided by Asian Development Bank and GlobalData. RGB49D (talk) 16:14, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 06:33, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Comment. I looked at the sources provided by RGB49D. The first one is an academic paper and appears reasonable. The second and third are reports prepared by the company and cannot be used for notability. The fourth is a business which offers to provide a report on this company, for money: that cannot be considered a published source. M kuhner (talk) 18:40, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep In addition to the sources identified by RGB49D the subject has received substantial coverage in other independent, reliable sources. Taken together, the available sourcing is enough to satisfy the WP:NCORP guideline. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KURTLEEMER (talk • contribs) 07:52, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

  Where? Zalaraz (talk) 09:31, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete and salt Per nomination, due to lack of independent sources providing the significant coverage needed for an article (WP:ORGDEPTH), and also taking into consideration previous AfDs on the subject. Zalaraz (talk) 09:34, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Comment [11], [12], [13], [14], [15] This coverage provides significant, in-depth discussion of the subject and appears sufficient to satisfy the requirements WP:CORPDEPTH.KURTLEEMER (talk) 11:16, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A source analysis would be helpful here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 15:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Howard Dayton

Howard Dayton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Request for additional citations has been up since December, nothing has been added or found since then. A quick look at Google News and JStor reveals nothing immediately, and there also looks like there is a COI issue within the edit history here. Even if this subject can become notable, which seems unlikely, it should be entirely recreated due to the COI issues. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 14:38, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Radio, Christianity, Florida, and Georgia (U.S. state). Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:46, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Merge to Crown Financial Ministries, which he headed after his ministry merged with it and about which there are some articles.[16][17][18] Jahaza (talk) 16:30, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Howard Dayton is a notable figure in 20th and 21st century. Dave Ramsey credits Howard with teaching him financial principles that he espouses to this day. Howard has appeared on Good Morning America and has been an advisor to many prominent figures. Howard is currently writing a new book. I will be happy to update the article and provide citations where needed. Maverick Martin (talk) 19:45, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Comment: If you wanna do a WP:HEY save, more power to you, but Dave Ramsey claiming anything is not a benefit to your arguement, as most of what comes out of his mouth is complete and utter garbage. Foxtrot620 (talk) 21:01, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Craig Snyder (writer)

Craig Snyder (writer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sign of notability. Allan Nonymous (talk) 14:33, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. Allan Nonymous (talk) 14:33, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Journalism, Photography, and Florida. Shellwood (talk) 15:19, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Elisabeth Jensen

Elisabeth Jensen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One-time congressional candidate and activist who did not receive significant coverage during her only campaign. The article also reads as vaguely self-promotional—and she is recorded as having made at least two edits herself. Redirecting to 2014 United States House of Representatives elections in Kentucky#District 6 would make sense if deletion is not an agreeable outcome. PA Uploader (talk) 14:32, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and Kentucky. PA Uploader (talk) 14:32, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect: to 2014 United States House of Representatives elections in Kentucky#District 6 as reasonably someone could search for her, and such a redirect is valuable if we're removing her page. Foxtrot620 (talk) 20:59, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect: to 2014 United States House of Representatives elections in Kentucky#District 6 Does not meet WP:NPOL, but a redirect would make sense in this case. EaglesFan37 (talk) 01:04, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No support for any ATD. Owen× ☎ 15:06, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

University of Montana (campuses)

University of Montana (campuses) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redundant to Montana University System. Awkward title so not a plausible redirect. PROD contested with no useful explanation * Pppery * _{in solidarity} 15:33, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Montana. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:50, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not sure this is eligible for a soft-close redirect. Would prefer a quorum here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 13:54, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Everything is already in Montana University System which is a full-fledged article. M kuhner (talk) 14:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: Per nom in toto. To have a full scale duplication of information under a clunkier title is asinine, and even if it wasn't duplicate, I'd be here asking for merger, given there is no reasonable need for the two pages to exist separately. Foxtrot620 (talk) 14:47, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

North Creswick railway station

North Creswick railway station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Creswick railway station because this article on its own contains very minimal detail and sources. LachlanTansey (talk) 10:50, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Stations and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 10:59, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep separate. The proponent's argument appears to be more a reason to expand the article than to abolish it. It was a junction station on the Victorian railway network, quite distinct from the through station serving the town of Creswick, Victoria. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScottDavis (talk • contribs) 01:35, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 12:40, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Comment If it's not kept, then merging into Ballarat to Daylesford railway line would be a better option than a different station - the article about the branch line needs to talk about the junction's history anyway. Adam Sampson (talk) 23:05, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Being distinct is not a valid argument against merging the articles, per WP:PAGEDECIDE and WP:MERGEREASON.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 13:50, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep In addition to the sources given in the article, I found a few GBooks sources as well that prove continued mentions of the station: This book mentioning the new line to the station and this book providing statistics. However if it is merged I do not support merging it to Creswick railway station as this is a different station. I agree with Adam Sampson above that in that case I would rather it be merged to the article on the line. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 18:47, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Plane wave tube

Plane wave tube (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally unsourced. I have tried restoring the previous redirect and been reverted. If another redirect is appropriate, editors can feel free to suggest it. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 09:08, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Technology. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 09:08, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Based on a quick search I do not see sufficient notability. The claim by Kvng that the topic is notable does not appear to be supported by adequate sources. In any case, restoring an unsourced page is not a good way to build Wikipedia, per WP:BURDEN it was their responsibility to prove their claim. Citing WP:DEMOLISH to defend an article that has been unsourced for 17 years does not make sense to me. From this audio standard the page content is not that accurate, so I dont see the redirect or a merge as a great ATD. If there is a major WP:HEY rewrite then I might reconsider my vote.Ldm1954 (talk) 12:11, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep - Multiple reliable sources found in Books search: [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]. We prefer to improve rather than delete articles on notable topics. If no one immediately steps up to make the improvements, do we still delete? How long do we wait? WP:NOTCLEANUP. ~Kvng (talk) 14:51, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

  @Kvng, per policy in WP:BURDEN, if you revert a PROD/Redirect it is up to you to repair the problem, particularly for an unsourced article. In addition, if nobody has repaired the problem in 17 years then IMHO the improvements must be made immediately. Ldm1954 (talk) 15:02, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

  I've seen this editing pattern and heard this argument before. Maybe it will prevail this time, we'll see. I appreciate the desire to improve the encyclopedia that I assume is behind it, sweeping the cobwebs out of corners. I don't appreciate the confrontational approach as it is not conducive to the collaboration that I believe is fundamental to the success of Wikipedia. ~Kvng (talk) 15:13, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

  What's confrontational? You made an action against a PROD. It's either no action or it will go to AfD. – The Grid (talk) 17:36, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

  The confrontation is deleting the material and objecting to anyone restoring it per BURDEN. Less confrontational would be to fix the problem, alert an associated wikiproject or let it slide. ~Kvng (talk) 17:50, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'm not convinced by the WP:BURDEN argument; while I personally prefer those wanting to keep an article to improve it during an AfD, there is no requirement to do so. More discussion is required.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:45, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep - per sources provided, it definitely meets notability Jishara (talk) 20:00, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 12:14, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Comment a clarification wrt Ritchie333's comment about WP:BURDEN and the history.

1. Bearian redirected the article on June 24th 2026 since it had been tagged as unreferenced since 2019.
2. Kvng reverted this on June 29th, but did not add any sources or talk page explanation.
3. Bearian proceeded to PROD it as unreferenced for 17 years after doing a WP:BEFORE that did not indicate SIGCOV (see PROD edit comments).
4. Mariamnei decided to act on the PROD by restoring the earlier redirect. on June 30th.
5. On July 3rd Kvng again removed the redirect, again without producing any sources or attempts on the talk page to reach concensus.
6. Then on July 6th Mariamnei decided to AfD the page.

I made the WP:BURDEN point in response to the AfD, since Kvng had twice restored an unsourced article. I also stated that if someone did a standard WP:HEY rescue I would reconsider my vote. At that stage a very experienced admin and two experienced NPP had indicated major issues with the page.

If Kvng edits the page, as is standard, and does a WP:HEY rescue then a reappraisal is appropriate. The revised page needs to respond to the criticism (to quote Bearian's argument in the PROD) Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources; only a handful of passing mentions on Google Books. Appears to be original research..

One of the sources that Kvng has argued provides SIGCOV (3) is a homework problem; 1-2, 4 and 6 are short mentions; 5 is better so might count towards WP:42. Per policy, 3 or more detailed descriptions are required for WP:42, and as yet I do not see them; I have seen nothing that convinces me that Bearian was wrong in his WP:BEFORE. Ldm1954 (talk) 18:34, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect should be restored. Thanks for the pings. I rescue literally dozens of articles every month, month after month. After a Before Search, sometimes I will give up, after not seeing significant coverage, as in this case. Arguably, some random person could create a stub from such sourcing, and I hate to admit it, but I have done so a few times recently. However, this particular subject is a highly technical STEM topic, and in cases like this, sometimes it's just better to redirect. Call me weak, but don't call me lazy, and don't call me late for dinner. Bearian (talk) 19:18, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  I reverted the redirect because the topic is not mentioned in Anechoic chamber. I'm OK with a merge if consensus says this is not an independently notable topic. But, there are typically objections to merging unsourced material. I still think the best outcome is to keep and then improve the article. ~Kvng (talk) 21:28, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  Kvng, the unsourced page being discussed describes a plane wave tube as an anechoic chamber and a tube, so to me the redirect makes complete sense. In terms of keep and then improve you have not provided any evidence, or made any edits to the page that prove the topic is notable. To quote from the policy, The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material'. Ldm1954 (talk) 21:48, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  Read the lead, it is not an anechoic chamber, it is a tube-shaped chamber for making low-frequency acoustic measurements because these are not so easy to do in an anechoic chamber. ~Kvng (talk) 20:06, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 13:48, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

R v Wallace

R v Wallace (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A poorly sourced article, largely a spin-off of William Herbert Wallace, which contains an excessive amount of detail - for example, the complete (and improperly referenced) transcript of Justice Wright's summary really belongs on another website. Has been tagged for a lack of inline citations for over six years. I can't see any way of improving this article to an acceptable encyclopedic standard. I'm not sure whether the best course of action is to trim down this article and merge in the incorrectly convicted suspect, or the other way round, so a general discussion is best. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:30, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Law. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:30, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of England-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:09, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

The Wallace case is a cause célèbre. Some 20 books have been published on the case, and at least one full length movie and several TV shows have featured the case. It has attracted continued attention from both amateur and professional sleuths for 95 years. However, it was also a landmark British legal case, the first time the Court of Appeal had quashed a murder conviction on the ground that it could "not be supported, having regard to the evidence." Thus the legal case is highly notable in its own right. Moreover, almost all authors of books betray a fundamental misunderstanding of the legal aspects, characterising Wallace's acquittal as being based on the notion that Wallace's guilt was "not quite proven", or not proven "beyond reasonable doubt", which is as far from the truth as can be. The Court of Criminal Appeal were not permitted to acquit on such grounds, and of course they did not do so. Rather, they found there was absolutely zero evidence against Wallace which could sustain the conviction. Therefore it is important to maintain a distinction between the usually wrong-headed and colourful theorising of popular authors - who often still fancy Wallace as the culprit - and the sober legal facts of the case and the reasoning of the Court of Criminal Appeal in their seminal decision. Far from being a mere offshoot of the folklorish tale of William Herbert Wallace, as portrayed by imaginative authors, the legal case is the bedrock of any objective view of the crime. There is no reason not to maintain the clear distinction between the Wallace case in popular culture as one of the great "whodunnits", and the essential cold, hard legal facts as discerned by the Courts. There is no obvious reason why this case should be treated differently from, say, R v Adams (1957) and many others. I vote KEEP, and am happy to improve citations, etc. RodCrosby (talk) 13:39, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Oh, wow. I got goosebumps reading that. You’ve convinced me for sure! Let’s WP:HEY this article. But you need a bunch of citations, and they have to follow WP:SIGCOV. And you need to do that within a week, otherwise the AfD thread will close. Brynn Who Likes Editing (talk) 16:55, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

I want to see the sources first. If there are many sources that means the article can be improved, then why has nobody done it for the past 18 years? Also, one source I've found is titled Murder of Julia Wallace, and this title could be more appropriate for this article; there are similar articles such as Murder of Joanna Yeates or Murder of Zara Aleena, both of which caused government intervention and follow-up problems outside the murder itself. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:53, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep as per the rationale of User:RodCrosby. You guys can WP:HEY it. Brynn Who Likes Editing (talk) 16:56, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

I've done some work on the article, including cleaning it up and adding sources, but it still looks like mostly a duplicate of William Herbert Wallace, and the two articles could easily be combined together without requiring a spinoff one. So my "not keep" !vote stands. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:31, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please note that while notability is required for a standalone article, it is not a sufficient argument against merging to a related page, per WP:PAGEDECIDE and WP:MERGEREASON. The question before us is where would readers be best served in seeing the content.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 07:05, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep - WP:PAGEDECIDE and WP:MERGEREASON don't apply here as they would be confusing to readers together (the whole point of R. v Wallace is that his conviction was overturned). Jishara (talk) 14:27, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I still don't see any compelling, P&G-based arguments as to why the case, famous as it is, cannot be presented as an expanded section at the proposed target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 13:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Branko Radović (footballer, born 1993)

Branko Radović (footballer, born 1993) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Long-time stub of a Serbian footballer who probably spent his entire career in lower leagues. None of the references provided on the article contain significant coverage required to meet WP:GNG. WP:BEFORE is difficult because this name is rather common, even when searching in Cyrillic (Бранко Радовић). ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 13:43, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Serbia. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 13:43, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 17:33, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Eastern Dörbet

Eastern Dörbet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very old article since 2011 with no references or notability. Unreferenced tag been in place since 2011. Majash2020 (talk) 10:25, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of China-related AfD discussions. Majash2020 (talk) 10:25, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:33, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
  1. 黑龙江杜尔伯特蒙古族辞典 [Heilongjiang Duerbote Mongolian Dictionary] (in Chinese). Beijing: Publishing House of Minority Nationalities. 2006. ISBN 978-7-105-07860-8. Retrieved 2026-07-26 – via Google Books.

     The article notes: "爱纳嘎,姓孛尔只斤氏,清代称博尔济吉特,于嘉靖二十六年( 1547 )分牧于嫩江东畔,今杜尔伯特蒙古族自治县地域,因当时有都蛙锁豁儿后裔的杜尔伯特部在这里游牧,加之爱纳嘎的四个儿子阿都齐、布鲁格图、道尔吉伊勒登、呼木朝格图分地而牧,所以命其部为杜尔伯特部,治额勒森西伯。爱纳嘎长子阿都齐于天命九年( 1624 )归清,顺治五年( 1648 )清廷授阿都齐子色棱为札萨克贝子,始建杜尔伯特旗,驻多克多尔坡。清代归哲里木盟管辖。(波・少布)【杜尔伯特的含义】“杜尔伯特”是蒙古语数词“四”的复数之音译。是中古时期蒙古语构词读法。现代蒙古语“四”称“杜尔伯"

     From Google Translate: "... Ainaga, of the Borjigin clan, was known as the Borjigit during the Qing Dynasty. In 1547, during the 26th year of the Jiajing reign, he was assigned to graze on the east bank of the Nenjiang River, in the area of present-day Durbet Mongolian Autonomous County. At that time, the Durbet tribe, descendants of Duwa Suohuoer, grazed in this area. In addition, Ainaga's four sons, Aduqi, Brugetu, Dorjiilden, and Humchaogetu, divided the land to graze, so their tribe was named the Durbet tribe, and their capital was Elsenxibo. Ainaga's eldest son, Aduqi, submitted to the Qing Dynasty in 1624. In 1648, during the 5th year of the Shunzhi reign, the Qing court granted Aduqi's son, Sereng, the title of Jasak Beizi, and established the Durbet Banner, stationed at Dokdorpo. During the Qing Dynasty, it was under the jurisdiction of the Jerim League. (Bo Shaobu) [The Meaning of Durbet] "Durbet" is a transliteration of the plural form of the Mongolian numeral "four." It is the word formation and pronunciation in Middle Mongolian. In modern Mongolian, "four" is called "Durbe.""

  2. 黑龙江民族历史与文化 [Heilongjiang Ethnic History and Culture] (in Chinese). Beijing: Central University for Nationalities Press 中央民族学院出版社. 1993. p. 254. ISBN 978-7-8100-1565-3. Retrieved 2026-07-26 – via Google Books.

     The book notes: "爱纳嘎,游牧于嫩江中游左畔,承袭了杜尔伯特部之名。” @爱纳嘎为博尔济吉特氏,他驻牧杜尔伯特草原后,没有以博尔济吉特命其名,而运用了蒙元时期的杜尔伯特部落之名,正如《清史稿》中所说的“始以名其部” ,使杜尔伯特一名因袭相沿至今。 1989 年出版的《发展中的杜尔伯特》一书,将杜尔伯特一名解释为: “ 15 世纪,元太祖成吉思汗弟哈布图哈萨尔 16 世孙爱纳嘎率部游牧到此地,并以其分牧次序为四,而自称杜尔伯特。”事实上这段记载有三个错误:一是爱纳嘎到嫩江流域游牧的时间,不是 15 世纪,而是 16 世纪,正如上文所言,应在 1547 年以后;二是杜尔伯特的含义,决非分牧次序的四,而是四子氏族的四,如果说是分牧次序的四,那么分牧的一、二、三又在何处,从不见任何历史记载;三"

     From Google Translate: "Ainaga, nomadic on the left bank of the middle reaches of the Nenjiang River, inherited the name of the Durbet tribe. "Ainaga was a member of the Borjigit clan. After settling on the Durbet grassland, he did not use the Borjigit name, but instead used the name of the Durbet tribe from the Mongol Yuan dynasty, just as the Qing History Draft states, "He initially named his tribe after it," thus the name Durbet has been passed down to this day. The book "The Developing Durbet," published in 1989, explains the name Durbet as follows: "In the 15th century, Ainaga, the 16th generation descendant of Khabutu Khasar, brother of Genghis Khan, led his tribe to this area, and based on their order of herding, they called themselves Durbet." "In fact, this record contains three errors: First, the time when Ainaga migrated to the Nenjiang River basin was not the 15th century, but the 16th century, as mentioned above, it should be after 1547; second, the meaning of Durbet is definitely not the fourth in the order of herding, but the fourth of the four-son clan. If it is the fourth in the order of herding, then where are the first, second, and third herdings? There is no historical record of them; third..."

  3. Bao, Xiaoqing 白晓淸 (2002). 黑龙江蒙古族 [Heilongjiang Mongolian] (in Chinese). Harbin: Harbin Publishing House 哈尔滨出版社. p. 19. Retrieved 2026-07-26 – via Google Books.

     The book notes: "爱纳嘎,游牧于嫩江中游左畔,承袭了杜尔伯特部之名。明万历年间,女真族领袖努尔哈赤崛起,着手统一女真各部。蒙古科尔沁部与女真接壤,后金兴起初期,科尔沁部曾与女真其他部联合反努尔哈赤。万历二十一年( 1593 ) ,杜尔伯特部祖爱纳嘎子阿都钦参加了九部联军战争。天命元年( 1616 ) ,努尔哈赤建立后金政权。天命九年( 1624 ) ,杜尔伯特部酋长阿都齐达尔罕参加了努尔哈赤的会盟,从此杜尔伯特部皆归后金。崇德元年( 1636 )后金改国号为清。"

     From Google Translate: "Ainaga, nomadic on the left bank of the middle reaches of the Nenjiang River, inherited the name of the Durbet tribe. During the Wanli reign of the Ming Dynasty, Nurhaci, the leader of the Jurchen people, rose to power and began to unify the various Jurchen tribes. The Khorchin Mongols bordered the Jurchens. In the early stages of the rise of the Later Jin Dynasty, the Khorchin Mongols joined forces with other Jurchen tribes to oppose Nurhaci. In the 21st year of Wanli (1593), Ainaga's son, Aduqin, participated in the war of the nine tribes' alliance. In the first year of Tianming (1616), Nurhaci established the Later Jin regime. In the ninth year of Tianming (1624), Aduqidarhan, the chieftain of the Durbet tribe, participated in Nurhaci's alliance meeting, and from then on, the Durbet tribe all came under the control of the Later Jin. In the first year of Chongde (1636), the Later Jin dynasty changed its name to Qing."

  4. 黑龙江省满族朝鲜族回族蒙古族柯尔克孜族社会历史调查 [A Social and Historical Survey of the Manchu, Korean, Hui, Mongolian, and Kyrgyz Ethnic Groups in Heilongjiang Province] (in Chinese). Heilongjiang: Heilongjiang Korean Nationalities Publishing House 黑龙江朝鲜民族出版社. 1987. p. 100. Retrieved 2026-07-26 – via Google Books.

     The book notes: "杜尔伯特部,屠寄在注释中特别说明: “道蛙锁乎尔之后做朵儿别,是时此部当在东北路边,今嫩江左岸杜尔伯特之地。”所以杜尔伯特 ... 爱纳嘎,号车臣诺颜,于明正统十二年( 1407 年)率众移牧到嫩江东畔,与当地的杜尔伯特人融合,仍称杜尔伯特部。清天命九年( 1624 年)爱纳嘎之子阿都钦臣服于清,清天聪三年( 1629 年)征明,师还卒。传子色楞,封为辅国公。清顺治五年( 1648 年)清廷将杜尔伯特部改为杜尔伯特旗,并晋封色楞为扎萨克固山贝子,世袭掌旗。"

     From Google Translate: "The Durbet tribe, Tu Ji specifically noted in the annotation: "After Daowa Suohuer, he became Dorbie. At that time, this tribe should have been located on the northeastern side of the road, now the Durbet land on the left bank of the Nenjiang River." Therefore, the Durbet... Ainaga, also known as Chechen Noyan, led his people to migrate to the east bank of the Nenjiang River in the twelfth year of the Ming Zhengtong reign (1407), merging with the local Durbet people and still calling themselves the Durbet tribe. In the ninth year of the Qing Tianming reign (1624), Ainaga's son, Aduqin, submitted to the Qing. In the third year of the Qing Tiancong reign (1629), he led an expedition against the Ming, but died on the return journey. His son, Seleng, was enfeoffed as Duke of the State. In the fifth year of the Shunzhi reign of the Qing Dynasty (1648), the Qing court changed the Durbet tribe into the Durbet Banner and promoted Seleng to the title of Zasak Gushan Beizi, who was to be in charge of the banner hereditarily."

  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Dörbet simplified Chinese: 杜尔伯特部; traditional Chinese: 杜爾伯特部 to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

  Cunard (talk) 05:43, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:29, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Ukrainian attack on Iranian commercial vessel

Ukrainian attack on Iranian commercial vessel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Iran–Ukraine relations#Ukrainian retaliatory measures because this is an isolated incident related to the Russo–Ukrainian war (2022–present) (rather than the 2026 Iran war), and doesn't really warrant a separate article. 9ninety (talk) 12:47, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Iran, and Ukraine. Shellwood (talk) 12:55, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Merge per nom. The event is recent and, while covered by reliable sources, does not meet the long-term notability requirements of WP:NEVENT. Shahab760 (talk) 13:57, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. This is incredibly unlikely to have the kind of persistent WP:CIGCOV or position in cultural memory that justifies a page. Right now it's a violation of WP:TOOSOON, and I can't justify suggesting draftifying a page that shouldn't exist on it's own ever and if recreated, should only be done as a part of the per nom reccomended page. Foxtrot620 (talk) 15:42, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

C.D. Huracán

C.D. Huracán (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable lower tier football club. No coverage found to help it meet GNG. In the two sources provided, one mentions them in a single sentence that they would be playing another team. The second mentions them in a single sentence in an article about a player. Neither amounts to significant coverage. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:14, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Football and El Salvador. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:14, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to List of football clubs in El Salvador – As WP:ATD. Svartner (talk) 16:06, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:40, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Honor America Days

Honor America Days (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to United States federal observances#Other because the article currently has one primary source. I found minimal secondary mentions, but I am not convinced that it rises to the level of WP:GNG. If more substantial sources are found, please ping me. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 12:04, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events and United States of America. Shellwood (talk) 12:06, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep, the sourcing affirms that this is an official United States observance, passed by Congress and signed by U.S. president Bill Clinton. Almost every official U.S. national observances has a stand-alone article, nothing broken or unusual here. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect Congress passes a lot of stuff, that doesn't mean they need articles. Rather baffling comparison to other observances when (a) that's not even true, lots of items on that page don't have their own articles and (b) other things with articles actually have substance and significant souces! Why are all of your votes vibes-based or association-based and irrelevant to the GNG? I see local news that Rome, New York, actually has a parade called Honor America Days, but they've been doing that since before this was established; maybe present content and evidence that a standalone page would be justified based on those or others, not mere status of what it is. I can't find any coverage about the legislation when it passed. Reywas92^Talk 14:53, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: I concede that Randy Kryn is at least somewhat correct, and that we do host multiple pages for entirely imaginary statutory observences (not to say the statutory basis is imaginary, nor that the observence is undeserving, just that any practical effect is imaginary; to name a few we have Loyalty Day, National Aviation Day, and White Cane Safety Day). However, I stand to suggest that this may not be a matter of community consensus and may just be defacto policy. I rise to challenge this paradigm: We've already established that every act of a government doesn't automatically reach notability, (Not every law or act or bill has a Wikipedia Page, nor does every EO, proclamation, Joint Resolution, etc.), therefore, I posit that the standard should be this for ceremonial events: 1) They should have to meet the SIGCOV requirements in full, 2) There should be evidence of routine coverage on a yearly basis, and 3) The average citizen from the country in question should know what the heck the supposed observation is. No matter what, this page fails all of that, and WP:SIGCOV and thereby WP:GNG. Foxtrot620 (talk) 15:07, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete This is more of a basic proclamation in the same way post offices and events get the same; arguably the term is probably known more for unrelated commercial use (of the annual car sale or retailer type) than as something that ever had government programming and efforts behind it. Nathannah • 📮 23:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Love Malaysia Party

Love Malaysia Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Party that existed for a few years, never won a seat in any election, with very minimal coverage. Appears to fail WP:GNG. If more sources are found, please ping me. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:53, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related AfD discussions. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:53, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Malaysia. Shellwood (talk) 12:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep A vast number of sources can be found by searching the Malaysian name for the party - "Parti Cinta Malaysia". In the past few months I can find 1 2 3 4, and many more. I also note though that the party seems to have recently renamed and so may need an update on that front. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 18:54, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Samson G Balfour Smith

Samson G Balfour Smith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician. Sources are insufficient to establish notability under WP:GNG. Mascius (talk) 11:48, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. Mascius (talk) 11:48, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and France. Shellwood (talk) 11:59, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

see all the official links on page about the collaborations & past published works, as not just musician, but multimedia artist from early 2000 to 2026 ~2026-42318-12 (talk) 12:11, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. He may be a multifaceted multimedia artist, but I also can't find sources that establish notability. – Insincere Giraffe (talk) 19:11, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Inclusion is not decided on the basis of collaborations, published works, or length of career, but by what is written about the subject in reputable sources. I see no evidence of such coverage here. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:06, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

B.A.P Unplugged 2014

B.A.P Unplugged 2014 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article contains one source that confirms that the album exists. I was not able to find any SIGCOV. If more sources are found, please ping me. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related AfD discussions. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Timeline of the demographics of Palestine (region)

Timeline of the demographics of Palestine (region) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a complete overlap of the more comprehensive Demographic history of Palestine (region). No need for a WP:SPINOFF creating fragmentation. Longhornsg (talk) 11:10, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: History, Israel, and Palestine. Longhornsg (talk) 11:10, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Merge per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 11:14, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Merge - to a timeline section, not to existing sections of target article, as some readers prefer list/ordered display of chronological info! (though target article seems pretty long as is imo) - Asdfjrjjj (talk) 20:04, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Daniel Rui (footballer, born 1984)

Daniel Rui (footballer, born 1984) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article was de-prodded today. I really don't see how the subject is notable:

• They don't seem to have made an appearance in an Argentine top-tier competition (see BDFA profile, Worldfootball.net). They may have played professionally in El Salvador for Atletico Marte ([25]).
• A web search found nothing resembling WP:SIGCOV.
• No Spanish-language article exists.

The article fails WP:GNG. Robby.is.on (talk) 10:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Argentina. Robby.is.on (talk) 10:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - Yup, can't find anything that proves notability. I found a Facebook post from the Salvadoran team when they signed him, but no coverage otherwise that I can locate. 22 matches in El Salvador isn't usually going to confer notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:52, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete – Per above. Svartner (talk) 16:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Rivalries

Rivalries (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose restoring the longstanding redirect to Rivalry. I can't find secondary coverage of this product and it likely fails WP:NPRODUCT. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:24, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Revert to redirect, like it was for many years, instead of deletion. Fram (talk) 10:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of American football-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:24, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Products-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:24, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to rivalry per above and per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. I have no objection to an article being created on the uniform series, similar to the article on the former NFL Color Rush series, but a simple google search shows that the clear primary topic of “rivalries” is the competition/animosity between two groups or teams, covered at the Rivalry article. Frank Anchor 14:04, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Culm bomb

Culm bomb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough reference websites in general for this article. Does not meet the standards of WP:NOTE. Fence127 (talk) 10:12, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Also doesn't meet the standards of WP:GNG. Fence127 (talk) 10:17, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:21, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Okay. Fence127 (talk) 10:22, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• (Strong) Keep. While the title could be supported by more in-line references, my own WP:BEFORE search has returned a material volume of sources (academic and otherwise) which deal with the topic in some depth. Guliolopez (talk) 16:46, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Kasmira kingdom

Kasmira kingdom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose draftifying because this article has been completely unsourced for years. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:11, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of History-related AfD discussions. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:11, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:25, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:27, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Why is this one an exception to the rule of thumb that articles more than 90 days old should not be draftified? It's legal at AfD, certainly, but will it accomplish anything beyond what deletion would? M kuhner (talk) 14:11, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Oppose - article technically cites the Mahabharata parenthetically, though we'd now want a non-brackets cite style, and secondary sources. The {{multiple issues}} tag was only just added this month, so maybe that's why article's issues have been unaddressed for years? Would imagine draftifying would make it less likely that flagged issues are addressed (no?), so oppose rn, and would oppose deleting as topic seems notable. - Asdfjrjjj (talk) 19:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Rifat Rashid

Rifat Rashid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge to Students Against Discrimination. Subject was involved in the July Uprising and later led Students Against Discrimination, the article relies on coverage of them. According to me this article isn't notable enough for seperate article. Wikipicked (talk) 10:08, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:22, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:22, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Casablanca Film Factory

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Casablanca Film Factory
• Articles for deletion/Casablanca Film Factory (2nd nomination)

Casablanca Film Factory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has produced many films, but sources are mostly about films. No independent in-depth coverage. Fails WP:NCORP. Thilsebatti (talk) 09:45, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, India, and Kerala. Thilsebatti (talk) 09:45, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Film-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:00, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:00, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: Yes, produced many films, covered by independent reliable sources. Although much of the coverage focuses on the films, those sources consistently identify Casablanca Film Factory as the production company. Several productions have standalone Wikipedia articles, and the article can be further improved through normal editing rather than deletion. Superstars8547 (talk) 11:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  If you think several non notable productions have standalone Wikipedia articles, then you can nominate it for deletion. Having similar article like this is not a reason to argue in an AFD. See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Producing many films does not make this company notable. For that it needs to have independent significant coverage from multiple reliable sources. I can't find any such sources. Thilsebatti (talk) 19:06, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep - I think there are sufficient sources available on Google News. Imperiumscreen (talk) 11:12, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Can you tell me which are those sources you think. Thilsebatti (talk) 19:07, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Fenton, Cumbria

Fenton, Cumbria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose deletion because ... I believe that this article does not meet the criteria for notability. I identified it from the list of articles containing no references and opened an item in the Talk page to discuss deletion. Another editor added some references and removed the Unreferenced tag. We disagree on whether the added references are appropriate to establish notability. We invite comments from other editors. ChilternEdge (talk) 09:33, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep - Inhabited villages are generally notable, and in this one I see enough sources to not disprove that assertion. Jishara (talk) 13:30, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep because current policy is to presume that inhabited villages are notable, and there seems no doubt this is a real village that's had a population over a long period.[26] Looking at Google Maps, Fenton is quite distinct from Hayton, so I'm not sure a merge is appropriate, their combined status in one parish being a convenience of modern administration rather than a historical thing. Elemimele (talk) 10:00, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Hayton, Cumberland. Not every settlement needs its own article, especially a settlement as small as this one with an article that essentially says "it exists". 10mmsocket (talk) 10:00, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of England-related AfD discussions. ChilternEdge (talk) 09:33, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:01, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:01, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:GEOLAND: Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable... Clearly a recognised settlement. Not even especially small compared to some hamlets in the UK which are still recognised places. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:14, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• keep It plainly shows up on the OS map as a village, for starters. Surely better sourcing is possible but I'm not seeing a reason for deletion. Mangoe (talk) 14:37, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Weak keep as noted it is an OS settlement which may qualify it as legally recognized and it has sources on its name origin and giving its name to surnames. Crouch, Swale (talk) 14:52, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Government General Degree College, Kaliganj

Government General Degree College, Kaliganj (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Article relies on college website, University of Kalyani (to the univ. which this college is affiliated to) and NAAC records. I attempted to find sources but couldn't find any. Wikipicked (talk) 09:33, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Education-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to University of Kalyani#Affiliated Colleges, where it's listed, as an ATD-R. Additional searches didn't yield anything with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:18, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

GITEX AI India

GITEX AI India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is about a future event. Fails WP:GNG or WP:NEVENT. Most of the sources are announcements based on information provided by organizers. The page is premature too, a lot of elaboration on planned activities and expected features are mentioned. Wikipicked (talk) 09:26, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Suspected AI-generated articles-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Events-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Artificial intelligence-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:07, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:08, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

New welfarism

New welfarism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The concept and term is verifiable and has received some coverage but the available sources do not establish notability per WP:GNG. The content may better be incorporated into a broader article on India's welfare policy or the economic policy of the Narendra Modi government according to me. Wikipicked (talk) 09:17, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:10, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related AfD discussions. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 10:33, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Hot box (game)

Hot box (game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero indication of notability. Found literally nothing online. aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 11:49, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• @Aesurias: There are a few links to be found, especially on YouTube where you can find video of college teams playing it. References in print are harder to come by but not impossible [27]. That said: it's a practice game played by ultimate teams when not enough people came to practice. Most ultimate players have at least heard of it, but I'm not sure it has much life outside that community. Pretty sure this article got split out of the main one rather than adding a "variant games" subsection, but that was twenty years ago so I forget, heh. Bcordes (talk) 21:32, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related AfD discussions. aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 11:49, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 09:14, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Merge to Ultimate frisbee would seem appropriate given lack of independent notability; the reference given by Bcordes would work well there. M kuhner (talk) 14:14, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

National Roofing Contractors Association

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/National Roofing Contractors Association
• Articles for deletion/National Roofing Contractors Association (2nd nomination)

National Roofing Contractors Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Last AfD was no consensus. Sources identified in last AfD were primary in nature. We need third party sources from outside the roofing industry which this article lacks. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 07:06, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Organizations, Business, and United States of America. LibStar (talk) 07:06, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep This article about the president [28], this one about a scholarship [29]. They've been offering advice on how to fix your roof in about every Gnewspaper article you pull up, could be seen as experts in the area, that also confirms notability. Oaktree b (talk) 14:38, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

  An award given to roofers [30]. Oaktree b (talk) 14:45, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 11:41, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 09:13, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep per sources provided by Oaktree squeaking it through. Jishara (talk) 13:35, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: as per @Oaktree b. Xcccccccc123 (talk) 19:36, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

B&K Corporation

B&K Corporation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP miserably; hardly any independant coverage exists (beyond mere investor-oriented churnalism pieces on new stocks). 海盐沙冰 _{/ aka irisChronomia / Talk} 10:40, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related AfD discussions. 海盐沙冰 _{/ aka irisChronomia / Talk} 10:40, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of China-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:21, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

The company has received independent coverage focusing on its drug-development activities rather than only on its financing. Reports by National Business Daily, Jiemian News and STAR Market Daily have examined the company’s PDGF-based candidates, including Pro-101-1 for burns and Pro-101-2 for diabetic foot ulcers, as well as their clinical progress, safety data, competing growth-factor therapies and uncertain commercial potential. Since the company has not yet commercialised a drug, these reports mainly concern its product pipeline rather than marketed products or services.

Links:

• National Business Daily:

https://www.nbd.com.cn/articles/2025-09-15/4061780.html

• Jiemian News:

https://www.jiemian.com/article/13803599.html

• STAR Market Daily / CLS:

https://www.cls.cn/detail/1672329 Hr6688 (talk) 08:07, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
  1. Yu, Dian 于典 (2025-09-19). "至今未有产品实现上市　核心产品尚未进入临床三期 华芢生物三闯港交所："十三年磨一剑"成色待考" [No products launched to date; core products yet to enter Phase III clinical trials. Huaren Bio makes its third attempt at a Hong Kong listing: the true mettle of its "thirteen years of honing" remains to be proven]. Economic Information Daily (in Chinese). Xinhua News Agency. Archived from the original on 2026-07-27. Retrieved 2026-07-27.

     The article notes: "作为一家成立于2012年的生物科技公司，华芢生物至今仍未有产品实现上市，且核心产品尚未进入临床三期。... 进一步梳理不难发现，高额行政费用的背后，与持续亏损背景下公司董事持续增长的薪酬息息相关。2023年公司董事薪酬为639.9万元，2024年则达到1223.8万元，短短一年时间几乎翻倍增长。2025年前5个月公司董事薪酬为544.4万元，较去年同期进一步增长。 ... 值得注意的是，成立于2012年的华芢生物，直到2024年4月才改制为股份公司。在发展历程中，公司完成股改前的注册资本曾在实控人贾丽加与王轲珑的多位亲属间流转，且普遍以原价转让出手，又最终流向贾丽加与王轲珑，转让理由多为满足个人及家庭现金流灵活性需求等。"

     From Google Translate: "Although Huaren Bio was established in 2012, it has yet to bring any products to market, and its core product has not yet entered Phase III clinical trials. ... A closer examination reveals that the high administrative expenses are closely linked to the steadily rising compensation of the company's directors, even as the company continues to incur losses. Directors' compensation rose from RMB 6.399 million in 2023 to RMB 12.238 million in 2024—nearly doubling in just one year. In the first five months of 2025, directors' compensation totaled RMB 5.444 million, marking a further increase compared to the same period the previous year. ... It is worth noting that Huaren Bio, founded in 2012, did not restructure into a joint-stock company until April 2024. During its development—prior to this restructuring—the company's registered capital changed hands among various relatives of controlling shareholders Jia Lijia and Wang Kelong. These transfers were generally executed at the original cost price and ultimately flowed back to Jia and Wang; the stated reasons for the transfers often cited the need for personal and family cash flow flexibility."

  2. Yan, Yinchan 鄢银婵 (2025-09-16). Hu, Qing 胡青 (ed.). "华芢生物成立13年来无药上市 背负对赌协议闯关港交所" [Huaren Bio Seeks HKEX Listing Under Pressure of Valuation Adjustment Agreements After 13 Years Without a Marketed Drug]. National Business Daily (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2026-07-27. Retrieved 2026-07-27.

     The article notes: "经过13年漫长研发、数亿元持续投入，华芢生物仍徘徊在“三无”（没有稳定收入，没有商业化产品，没有盈利）十字路口。经过13年漫长研发、数亿元持续投入，华芢生物仍徘徊在“三无”（没有稳定收入，没有商业化产品，没有盈利）十字路口。《每日经济新闻》记者注意到，这家专注于血小板衍生生长因子（PDGF）药物研发的生物科技企业，被寄望填补国产空白，但公司同时面临行政开支高企、对赌上市的压力。在董事薪酬2024年上涨的另一面，则是核心产品尚未获批、市场规模存在天花板等现实。如今，华芢生物冲刺港交所IPO（首次公开募股），能否成功过关而一解现实难题，还有待观察。"

     From Google Translate: "After 13 years of extensive R&D and hundreds of millions of yuan in sustained investment, Huaren Bio remains at a crossroads defined by a "three-no" status: no stable revenue, no commercialized products, and no profitability. A reporter from *Daily Economic News* noted that while this biotech firm—focused on developing platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) drugs—is expected to fill a gap in the domestic market, it simultaneously faces high administrative expenses and pressure regarding listing-related performance commitments. The rise in director compensation in 2024 stands in contrast to the reality that its core products have yet to receive approval and the market size faces a growth ceiling. As Huaren Bio makes a push for an IPO on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, it remains to be seen whether it can succeed and resolve its pressing practical challenges."

  3. Fan, Jiazhi 范嘉智 (2025-12-25). "财说｜华芢生物两日下跌超四成，PDGF产品有多大想象空间？" [Financial Insight｜Huaren Biotech Plunges Over 40% in Two Days: What Is the Growth Potential for Its PDGF Products?]. Jiemian News (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2026-07-27. Retrieved 2026-07-27.

     The article notes: "华芢生物核心看点在两款PDGF候选药物上。Pro-101-1为重组人PDGF-BB蛋白药物，拟用于深II度烧烫伤，已完成国内IIb期并进入总结阶段，计划2025年第三季度启动III期并力争2027年在中国递交上市申请；Pro-101-2用于糖尿病足溃疡，处于国内II期，预计2027年第二季度完成并瞄准2030年前后在中国上市。其中，Pro-101-1在IIb期全分析集主要终点未达统计学显著差异，华芢生物拟在III期优化入排标准与中心管理。"

     From Google Translate: "Huaren Bio’s core value proposition lies in two PDGF candidate drugs. Pro-101-1 is a recombinant human PDGF-BB protein drug intended for deep second-degree burns and scalds; it has completed Phase IIb trials in China and is currently in the data summary phase, with plans to launch Phase III trials in the third quarter of 2025 and submit a marketing application in China by 2027. Pro-101-2, intended for diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), is currently in Phase II trials in China; completion is expected in the second quarter of 2027, with a target market launch around 2030. Notably, Pro-101-1 failed to achieve statistical significance regarding the primary endpoint in the Phase IIb full analysis set; Huaren Bio plans to optimize inclusion/exclusion criteria and clinical site management for the Phase III trial."

  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow B&K Corporation (Chinese: 青城新藥生物科技（青島）股份有限公司), formerly known as Chinese: 華芢生物, to pass Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria, which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject".

  Cunard (talk) 08:17, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 09:12, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: Obviously notable. Altitude Multitude (talk) 10:33, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Yara Naoum

Yara Naoum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO as coverage is exclusively for WP:SINGLEEVENT. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:04, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related AfD discussions. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:04, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Egypt. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:33, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep - I see this one and this one regarding allegations of classism in 2020, this one with her as a Miss Universe competitor in 2008, this biography on her from a sports site, this one,. I also think searching her name's Arabic translation (يارا نعوم) yields a lot more sources, as, of course, she's Egyptian. Jishara (talk) 14:24, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep, because she meets the notability criteria through her national title, significant media coverage, and impact on public discourse. Deletion would ignore her relevance as a public figure and the precedent set by similar cases. Instead, efforts should focus on improving the article’s quality and sourcing. Umardafaqussamk (talk) 05:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 09:12, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

X-Dynasty

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/X-Dynasty
• Articles for deletion/X-Dynasty (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/X-Dynasty (3rd nomination)

X-Dynasty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's absolutely no WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO pass. Let me first talk about how nothing came up from a cursory search, absolutely nothing other than social media posts and very unrelated links. Pinging @Spartaz: to please protect this discussion per the previous one. Here's my source analysis, it goes without saying:

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://thesun.ng/x-dynasty-a-life-of-violence-to-others-depression-and-a-journey-to-becoming-a-role-model/	HTTP 404, but I imagine it is as promotional as the others, and a basic regurgitation.	HTTP 404	HTTP 404	? Unknown
https://www.thisdaylive.com/2025/10/11/from-darkness-to-digital-light-x-dynasty-turns-pain-into-purpose-through-streaming/	Absolutely not, “I didn’t plan to become a creator,” he says. “I just wanted to feel alive again. And now, I want to be that reminder for someone else.”	Nope. Where's the byline? It is high time we started knowing that every "FEATURED" from This Day is most likely paid for.	I'd give it that for the fact that WP:SIGCOV is met	✘ No
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2025/12/x-dynasty-turns-personal-struggles-into-digital-movement-built-around-numb/	This piece from Vanguard screams thrash, allow me to be blunt, “NUMB is not about being empty,” he said during one session.	Nope. Apart from the missing byline, does As his influence expands, NUMB appears set to remain central to both his content and the community forming around him. not remind you of something? I mean the pattern.	Welp, this is mostly about NUMB, so I can't give SIGCOV of X-Dynasty to it.	✘ No
https://themetro.net.ng/nigerian-youtuber-x-dynasty-gains-momentum-with-viral-streams-and-youth-centric-content/	I find it a waste of time to assess this source.	Why should I rely on this publication that lacks editorial oversight? FGS, if there was an editorial oversight, this particular piece would have been purged from their publication, or not even accepted in the first place. SMH.	Again, I'd give it to it.	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:03, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Internet, and Nigeria. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:03, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Source analysis is compelling. A WP:BEFORE finds nothing. Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. scope_creep^Talk 20:56, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 09:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, was not able to find anything that looked reliable or wasn't just influencer-spam. The source analysis given above seems accurate. Significant sock problems and SEO efforts are not helping. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:50, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Palestinian Communist Party (1922)

Palestinian Communist Party (1922) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This formal merge proposal was incorrectly opened on the article's talk page. Following the March 2026 RfC, formal merge discussions are now held at AfD rather than the historical Proposed article mergers process (PAM). I've moved the discussion accordingly per WP:TPO.

Moved from Talk:Palestinian Communist Party (1922) § Merge into Palestine Communist Party

 – FaviFake (talk) 22:12, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Merge into Palestine Communist Party

This article describes a very short‑lived organization (1922–1923) whose sole historical significance is as one of the factions that merged in 1923 to form the Palestine Communist Party.

The content here closely parallels that of Communist Party of Palestine (1922–1923): both pages cover factions emerging from the same split, differing primarily in their attitudes toward Zionism, and both ceased to exist independently once the unified Palestine Communist Party was formed. As such, the material fits naturally into an early “Origins” or “Formation (1921–1923)” section of the main Palestine Communist Party article.

Per WP:MERGE and WP:SUMMARYSTYLE, keeping this as a standalone article results in unnecessary duplication across multiple short pages describing the same brief formative period. A merge would improve clarity while preserving all sourced content. LevantineArchivist (talk) 21:33, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose - the experience tends to be the opposite, that when separate parties are merged into a single article the identity of each groups gets confounded. --Soman (talk) 23:22, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

I generally agree that distinct identities shouldn't be lost in mergers. However, because this was such a brief, limited-effect splinter group, there just isn't enough verifiable material in English or Hebrew to meet the general notability guidelines for a standalone page. Its primary historical significance is the merger itself. If we follow WP:SUMMARYSTYLE and merge it into a clearly defined "1922 Split" or "Origins" subsection of the Palestine Communist Party article, we can fully preserve its distinct historical identity and ideological differences without leaving a permanent stub that can't be expanded. LevantineArchivist (talk) 23:40, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Merge per nominator's rationale. While the topic itself may or may not be notable, this is a major aspect of the history of these organisations and it would be better to cover all of it on a single page instead of spreading it across two pages, per WP:OVERLAP. FaviFake (talk) 22:14, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Palestine. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:49, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose this party was still distinct from the others and for the sake of historical posterity should be kept as such. Agnieszka653 (talk) 00:41, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:27, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support - I agree with nom that this is better presented as a facet of the target article (WP:NOPAGE). Samuelshraga (talk) 14:49, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please note that the two being distinct entities is not a valid argument against merging. The question before us is whether readers would be better served seeing the content on one page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 09:01, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Golf simulator

Golf simulator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This formal merge proposal was incorrectly opened on the article's talk page. Following the March 2026 RfC, formal merge discussions are now held at AfD rather than the historical Proposed article mergers process (PAM). I've moved the discussion accordingly per WP:TPO.

Moved from Talk:Driving range § Merger of Golf simulator

 – FaviFake (talk) 22:19, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Merge into Driving range

I propose merging Golf simulator, into this article. The simulator article doesn't have many references for the majority of it's content. Furthermore, it appears article is mostly referencing the modern simulator. It being a form of golf practice that seemed to emerge as an alternative from a driving range.

Any encyclopedic content that page has could be moved to a dedicated section in this page for the modern simulator. Issac I Navarro (talk) 21:23, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

• I also wanted to point out that

has been moved to golf simulator, relevant content from that move should also be placed in its own section on the driving range article.Issac I Navarro (talk) 22:47, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

• Merge per nominator's rationale. It is indeed scarcely sourced. FaviFake (talk) 22:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Products, Golf, and Technology. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:50, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose. These are really different entities although they may be co-located sometimes. Tewapack (talk) 23:06, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

The golf simulator, page has hardly any sources. The current pages reads more like a dictionary entry then an encyclopedic article. Per WP:NOTDICT. Also Wikipedia is WP:NOTGUIDE, the simulator article, currently appears to be more in that realm. Issac I Navarro (talk) 23:17, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:27, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. The topic is distinct from driving range, and it qualifies for GNG. I don't see any good reason why it should be merged. Shocksingularity (talk) 00:58, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

@Shocksingularity, The current page lacks many citations and is written more like a WP:NOTGUIDE on how the simulators are used rather then an encyclopedic entry. Much of the simulator article could be trimed; as it consists of unsourced descriptions of features, components, among many other non encyclopedic details.

Additionally, golf simulators are ultimately a form of golf practice. From the available sources I was able to find, driving ranges are a rather new form of golf practice; only dating to the 1920s. While, indoor golf hitting areas seemed to have emerged around this time, as an indoor alternative. Thus, the simulator screen was the next technological advancement.

That being said, the technology itself could be distinct, however, the current content on the page doesn't seem to justifies a standalone article. Any reliably sourced content on that page, (if any,) that has an encyclopedic merit, could be incorporated into a section that shows the different types of practice facilities and their counter parts.

As the other common golf practice facilities that are often found with driving ranges are: sand bunkers, putting greens, and chipping greens. Range simulators are the alternative to the driving range. Much like how portable putting greens, are to practice green. Issac I Navarro (talk) 04:21, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

I don't see how this article is a guide. Yes, it explains how the simulators work, but the explanation is moreso how the technology functions rather than how someone would use the technology. I actually think that section is written fine, although it needs more citations and shouldn't make up 90% of the article.

I agree that the article is not the best, and could be improved. But that's not grounds for deletion. The topic is notable; the article should be kept. Shocksingularity (talk) 01:36, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

@Shocksingularity, I agree that the subject is noteworthy. However, it doesn't seem to warrant it's own page due to a few issues and its lack of references.

That being said, my rational comes from how I would of approached this page by doing the historic merge proposal. I wasn't aware of the March 2026 RfC, that made formal merge discussions to be held at AfD. Correct me if I am mistaken, but I don't think WP:DEL-REASON would apply, because the intention is to merge the page, not delete it. Issac I Navarro (talk) 07:09, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Seems distinct enough for its own page. Is widespread all around the world. The problem with unsourced information can be solved editorially. Geschichte (talk) 06:32, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 08:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Merge as per rationale as it has sufficient sources.Farhanansari1994 (talk) 10:15, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Pakistan Awaam Raaj Tehreek

Pakistan Awaam Raaj Tehreek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Iqrar Ul Hassan because there is some routine coverage on its launch. Fails WP:NORG. BookishReader (talk) 07:06, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 08:14, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

-keep: The party is significant enough and is cited by multiple news sources as an official party TryFast (talk) 13:53, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 08:56, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Moneypenny Group

Moneypenny Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Suspected COI. Highly promotional article. The sources are primarily, interviews, press releases or sponsored content. No significant independent in-depth coverage is there for establishing notability. Naanu65 (talk) 08:55, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom. Naanu65 (talk) 08:55, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Comment, I do not have a COI, just a local. Although won't comment on its notability, no strong view either way. DankJae 09:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Also note my expansion of the article was reverted by the nominator. Whether it was enough is up for debate. DankJae 09:12, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Wales and Minnesota. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:15, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Asansol Christian Cemetery

Asansol Christian Cemetery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Other than ETV Bharat talking about this, can't find more. Other references point to christian orgs websites and a report cited mentions that there is a new cemetary opened in Asansol. Not more than that. Wikipicked (talk) 08:54, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:01, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - nothing to indicate GNG or WP:GEOFEAT's heritage criterion. - Embyarby (talk) 18:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Daita Sriramulu Hindu College of Law

Daita Sriramulu Hindu College of Law (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to demonstrate notability under WP:GNG and WP:NORG. This page is supported by admission websites which aren't taken for significant independent coverage. The sources contains routine information about college, like every other college may have. Wikipicked (talk) 08:49, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Andhra Pradesh-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Law-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Education-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Neurodiversity and labor rights

Neurodiversity and labor rights (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another AI-generated "X in Y" article (or in this case, "X and Y"). Fails WP:NOLLM and WP:ESSAY, likely containing WP:OR as well. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:26, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related AfD discussions. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:26, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Suspected AI-generated articles-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:51, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Salvaging the content is not possible either given the information present and how it's written. Agreeing with nom and their assessment. ABehjat (talk) 22:58, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

• Hold up. This was published by Lane Raspberry, whom I rather doubt was using AI. It appears to have been made in an editathon. Why do you think it is AI? Was it introduced after Lane published it? If so, surely this can be salvaged by just reverting to an earlier version. Or perhaps Lane has insight into its creation? CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 23:15, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

  For me, the section labelled `Neurodiversity-lite` sounded a lot like an AI article (basically like an essay transformed to a Wiki article template/format). ABehjat (talk) 23:25, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

  That section was added after Lane published it: see original version. Keep per CaptainEek. Ca ^{talk to me!} 23:35, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

  Sounds good - I wasn't aware of the context, and was reviewing the most recent set of changes and it was a lot of back and forth between two users so I thought it was spam.

  I'll change my vote from delete to Keep with the goal of reverting to the linked version. ABehjat (talk) 00:07, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

  I confirm, no AI! Bluerasberry (talk) 13:49, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

• (If we restore to original created article) - Rename to "Neurodiversity in work environments" or "Workplace accommodations for neurodiverse persons" - title(s) better suiting the sources, since the sources don't mention "labor rights"

@Bluerasberry: - Any suggestions/comments? ---Avatar317^(talk) 00:35, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

@Avatar317: I do not have a rename suggestion. There are Wikipedia articles or redirects for "labor rights by (country)", and I chose this title based on that precedent, which is an adequate fit but there could be something better. Bluerasberry (talk) 13:49, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

• Merge to Employment of autistic people. While that article was created a several months later as a translation of the Fr.wiki article, it is much more comprehensive and there is significant overlap here even if neurodivergence and autism are not exactly the same. The Accomodation section is somewhat duplicative of Employment of autistic people#Adapting working conditions, the Advantages section is related to Employment of autistic people#Selective advantages, and the Demographics section seems redundant to Employment of autistic people#Employment rates. I see no need for this to be a separate overlapping article, which was a good start at a meetup event but no longer necessary. Reywas92^Talk 03:55, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

  • Support merge - now that you pointed out that the target article exists, which I was unaware of. ---Avatar317^(talk) 05:01, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

    I could also support a merge to this target if the AI-ish material is revised or removed. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 10:44, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

@Avatar317 and WeirdNAnnoyed: Would you both join a move discussion at that article? Talk:Employment_of_autistic_people#Move_discussion Bluerasberry (talk) 13:49, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep, oppose merge to Employment of autistic people. Autism ≠ neurodiversity, and the article also mentions ADHD, developmental coordination disorder and dyslexia. Guettarda (talk) 13:26, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: I oppose a deletion, but whether to merge or move is up to you all. Everyone knows Blueraspberry, who ran for the WMF board, and by reputation would never create an AI article. Bearian (talk) 04:19, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 04:17, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep, I agree with the above, frankly. Lane is certainly far from someone to use AI in their writing. The article also definitely seems noteworthy here, and I would oppose a merge as above. The topic of neurodiversity is far broader than just autism. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 04:54, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep and Oppose Merge - article seems noteworthy. I'd also oppose any renaming, i think this is good as is. Jishara (talk) 14:32, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

How is this possibly the correct name for this? "Historically, neurodivergent people have experienced unemployment much more often than neurotypical people" is not about labor rights. "In 2015 Ernst & Young established a program to recruit autistic workers" is not about labor rights. "A common advantage is difference of perspective; because the demographic has a different lived experience, individuals in that demographic can speak for themselves to share opinions which often differ from neurotypical people" is not about labor rights. Of course its noteworthy, but there's another much better article that has the same content and more. This is way too duplicative to keep separate. The other article is welcome to include other types of neurodiversity besides autism but keeping this in addition to it is redundant and unnecessary, these are in no way distinct topics. — Reywas92^Talk 16:07, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

It very much appears to be about labor rights to me, including at least two of the sections you pointed out. I'm also strongly against any move or merge that titles it autism instead of just generally neurodiversity, because there are a lot of cases with one or both. Jishara (talk) 13:28, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Can you point out any SOURCES for this article that use the term "labor rights" ? Your own belief in what makes "labor rights" doesn't matter here, what matters is what sources say about the topic. ---Avatar317^(talk) 20:39, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please focus on the subject, not the title. Renaming the article is a simple editorial action that doesn't require AfD. Also be aware that being "noteworthy", or even notable, isn't a valid argument against merging, per WP:PAGEDECIDE and WP:MERGEREASON, if readers are better served seeing the content in one place. And again, neurodivergent being different from autistic does not, by itself, prevent a merger, if titles are amended accordingly.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 07:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Don't merge to anything with "autism" in the title unless the target can be renamed and is being expanded: autism and neurodiversity are not synonyms. There are lots of forms of neurodiversity that have consequences for employment, require accommodations in the workplace, or might end up affecting employment law, but are completely distinct from, and unconnected to, autism. Dyslexia is a very, very obvious example. Merging them would be as daft as merging Dog with Cat on the grounds that both have four paws and are commonly kept as pets. The original article and the current trimmed article both seem reasonable starting-points for a sourceable topic that doesn't deserve deletion. Elemimele (talk) 10:54, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Niki Sanders

Niki Sanders (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not demonstrated. There is no significant coverage on the character. I could not find independent sources dedicated exclusively and in-depth to the character, only passing mentions. WP:GNG JohnMizuki (talk) 00:45, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related AfD discussions. JohnMizuki (talk) 00:45, 22 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: this has been tagged as a potential GNG failure since 2022. (No opinion.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:52, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Television. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:53, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Fictional GNG. No go. Yesterday, all my dreams... (talk) 01:40, 22 July 2026 (UTC)
• Questions @JohnMizuki: Per the WP:SIGCOV guideline, the topic of an article specifically does not need to be the main topic of a secondary source in order for that source to count for coverage. Would that change the conclusion you've drawn from your WP:BEFORE search? Also, was a Google Scholar search included in your WP:BEFORE search. Because the list of hits one gets there looks very promising with regard to coverage of the character. Daranios (talk) 14:26, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

  All I could find I would characterise it as trivial or passing mentions. If the subject of a text is the series, and in that text there is a list of characters and Nikki Sanders is mentioned and described, that seems to me as a trivial mention. I couldn't find any evidence of this character in itself having significant coverage or cultural impact. JohnMizuki (talk) 10:06, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

  @JohnMizuki: As an example, the very first hit in my linked Google Scholar search, D'AMORE, LAURA MATTOON. "Mothers Who Split: Guilt, Working Motherhood, and Multiple Identity in Heroes, The Incredibles, More of Me, and Nurse Jackie." Bound by Love: Familial Bonding in Film and Television since 1950 (2011): 136-153., is an 18-page academic publication analysing a topic with four fictional characters as basis, one of them being Niki Sanders. So this is not a text about the series with Niki being mentioned in a list of characters, and can hardly be regarded as a trivial mention. As far as I can see in the non-complete preview of Google Scholar, the section "Heroes Supermom and Contemporary Motherhood" from page 139-143 is specifically dedicated to the character, next to more coverage distributed trough other parts of that publication. Daranios (talk) 14:12, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep The current version of the article does have a problem with regard to use of primary sources and WP:ALLPLOT, but WP:ARTN applies. John Badham: Blick und Bewegung is a German book, so it might not show up in everyone's Google Books search, but on p. 320-321 it dedicates ca. 1 page to the character, including analysis and comparisons to other characters within and beyond Heroes. So until my questions above are thoroughly answered, it seems very likely that this is a notable topic and I remain keep for now. Daranios (talk) 14:26, 22 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per sources on google scholar as it meets SIGCOV. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 14:56, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

  Please note that the Google Scholar mentions seem trivial or passing mentions. JohnMizuki (talk) 10:07, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

  The ones I have seen do not appear to be trivial at all, they look quite in depth DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 10:09, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 07:41, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep - I agree with DaniloDaysOfOurLives and Daranios here - the academic sources are more than sufficient to get this article through notability. Jishara (talk) 13:25, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Diogo Ribeiro (lexicographer)

Diogo Ribeiro (lexicographer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I didn't find sources despite searching with different terms. Fails WP:GNG Wikipicked (talk) 07:40, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Article is already sourced to Konkani Vishwakosh, a local language encyclopedia sponsored by the Government here. SerChevalerie (talk) 08:14, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

For an article to pass WP:GNG it need multiple reliable sources, not just one. Also typically an encyclopedia is not considered a reliable source. Hopefully that helps you understand why this was nominated for deletion. Dobblesteintalk 14:37, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Christianity, and Portugal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Khejuri British Cemetery

Khejuri British Cemetery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to establish notability WP:GNG according to me Wikipicked (talk) 07:36, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep, the sources and related material the subject easily meets WP:GNG. It is a heritage cemetery older than 200 years as per the record. There are several WP:RS i.e Anandabazar as well as tourism website maintained by Govt. of West Bengal. Pinakpani (talk) 07:51, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Can you give those specific sources which you're saying satisfies WP:GNG. Wikipicked (talk) 07:59, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Kindly see the ref no. 3, 5 & 8 of the article. Pinakpani (talk) 08:06, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  As the two of the sources you pointed to are in Bengali, I am not in a position to evaluate what's in it. I will leave it to editors familiar with Bengali and to closer to see whether they satisfy WP:GNG. Wikipicked (talk) 08:13, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:45, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep - did a quick check of Refs 3, 5, and 8 per Pinakpani and I agree with them that these refs are in fact sigcov from reasonably reliable sources - Jishara (talk) 13:37, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Sayed Babu

Sayed Babu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Went through all the references, references are not in-depth on the subject also some are PR. The subject fails to satisfy WP:GNG, and WP:ANYBIO. Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 07:36, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Bangladesh. Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 07:36, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Aaditya Kulshreshth

Aaditya Kulshreshth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think the subject doesn't satify standalone notability. Sources cites are mostly anouncements, interviews and routine coverage. Fails WP:GNG Wikipicked (talk) 07:31, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep – The nomination characterises the available sourcing too broadly. The subject has received sustained, subject-focused coverage across several years and independent editorial publications, rather than only launch announcements or passing mentions.

Examples include:

• Mid-Day’s 28 July 2023 subject-focused feature covering Kulshreshth’s career development and move from Bhopal to Mumbai.
• India Today’s 12 February 2025 article focused on his acting career, audition process and role in Loveyapa.
• The New Indian Express’s 4 March 2026 profile covering his stand-up career, creative development and comedy style.
• Shantanu Sanzgiri’s 18 June 2026 DeadAnt review of Fresher’s Party, which independently evaluates Kulshreshth’s writing, delivery, themes and position within the Indian comedy scene.
• Mint’s 15 January 2026 article specifically covering the reception of his work as the host of Shark Tank India season 5.
• Indulge Express’s June 2025 feature focused on the development and themes of his Fresher’s Party stand-up show.

The DeadAnt review is substantial independent critical commentary rather than an interview or announcement. The other profiles and reports provide further subject-focused coverage from separate editorial organisations over the period 2023–2026. Taken together, I believe these sources satisfy WP:GNG, which requires significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject and does not prescribe a fixed source count.

WP:ENT is also relevant. Kulshreshth has worked as the principal host of Shark Tank India season 5, appeared in a supporting acting role in the notable film Loveyapa, presented Ishq Interrupted, co-hosted IMDb’s Dekh Bhais, and worked as a writer on Farzi Mushaira. The hosting and acting roles should be considered when assessing whether he has had substantial roles across notable entertainment productions.

Some weaker, promotional, interview-heavy or routine citations can be removed or given less weight, and the article can be tightened to rely more heavily on independent secondary coverage. Those are remediable sourcing and article-quality issues rather than sufficient reasons for deletion. Keep and improve. Jsmentkol (talk) 14:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep – The current article appears to satisfy WP:BASIC and WP:GNG when the sources are assessed together. The sourcing is not limited to announcements or passing mentions: Mid-Day published a subject-focused profile in 2023; India Today and The New Indian Express carried substantial career features/interviews; and DeadAnt published a detailed independent critical review of the 2026 special Fresher's Party, discussing Kulshreshth's writing, comic voice and storytelling. The coverage spans several years and comes from separate editorial publications. Even where quoted interview material is primary for particular biographical claims, the DeadAnt review is clearly secondary, and WP:BASIC allows multiple sources of moderate depth to be considered together. The article contains enough reliably sourced material for a neutral standalone biography. I am not relying on follower counts, IMDb, event listings, or inherited notability. Any routine or weaker citations can be removed or replaced through normal editing rather than deletion. —Jsmentkol (talk) 14:45, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Television, and Madhya Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:29, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Vedic square

Vedic square (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like a WP:FRINGE "Vedic Mathematics"-related thing. I'm not an expert in the history of Indian mathematics but I cannot verify that the term has any adoption in serious mathematical literature, nor that a multiplication table with digital roots was used in Islamic art or Vedic-period Indian mathematics.

Citations do not look reliable to me. I looked around to try to improve them and it seems all information dates back to I found a 1989 journal article by Lesley Jones, which is peer-reviewed but still not trustworthy IMO -- it is in a teaching journal, not a history journal, and claims Indian and Islamic origins but suspiciously does not refer to a single primary source. I found no reliable citations that could salvage this page. 11wx (talk) 07:30, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

EDIT: I found one source older than Jones: Bunyard and Brine, 1988, "Islamic Art: Vedic square" in Micromath journal. I can't access this paper but again, it's in a mathematics education journal, which is not a good citation for statements on math history. Historical origins would be the only thing propping up this article's notability, as the mathematics of it are trivial, and as far as I can tell the Vedic/Islamic connections may have been invented by Bunyard and Brine. 11wx (talk) 17:17, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Mathematics and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:45, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep as Vedic Square is pretty practical and has a number of usage, an article would help someone who is willing to learn it. Farhanansari1994 (talk) 10:12, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Mathematically, this is trivial: just a multiplication table mod 9. But more to the point, we have no sources for this that could pass WP:GNG. The only footnotes are about a minor generalization to higher dimensions, and only one of them appears to be reliably published. The non-footnoted references are general reference books on mathematics (without page numbers and without content relevant to this), an unreliable web page, and a repeat of one of the footnotes. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:04, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete As noted above, it's just a multiplication table mod 9. A few bad-to-mediocre sources use the name "Vedic square"; none of them substantiate the history, which is all that the article could really have going for it in the best case. And if better sources did substantiate this as a motif in ancient art, that still wouldn't be enough to conclude that a whole article about it is the right way to cover the topic encyclopedically. Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 18:45, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Eppstein is correct; the digital root of $n$ in base $b$ is always equal to $1+((n-1){\bmod {(}}b-1))$ if $n\neq 0$. Observations in this article are almost all statements that are explained in Multiplicative group of integers modulo n or at the Cut the Knot EL at Modular arithmetic, since $n=9$ is a case where the generated group is cyclic. For example, every finite group has a Latin square as its Cayley table. No elaboration at all about the supposed significance of the tables in ancient cultures. It is unclear, in particular, if "Vedic" refers to an actual Vedic text about multiplication tables, Vedic Mathematics, or Bunyard and Brine's own invented version of the book's concept. If this concept does notably appear in art, it would be better covered at Multiplication table or Cayley table. Possibly there's a good source with similar information as the Cut the Knot page I mentioned earlier. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:14, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Narmandakhyn Narankhuu

Narmandakhyn Narankhuu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I did not find any WP:SIGCOV of this athlete and he likely fails WP:NSPORT. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:17, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related AfD discussions. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:17, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Mongolia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:26, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - poorly sourced; two external links are not enough for a BLP. Ping me if you add more. Bearian (talk) 04:52, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:26, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep - I've found https://uww.org/athletes/narmandakh-narankhuu, https://www.montsame.mn/en/read/30432, https://montsame.mn/mn/read/31243, and https://sport.gov.mn/competitions/i/11410/. Sources aren't great for sure, but these may be sufficient. He is a senior World Championships medalist, so I guess he is notable enough. Bearian. ScottyNolan (talk) 11:09, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
  • OK, ScottyNolan, please add them. Bearian (talk) 12:36, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

    Done. @Bearian ScottyNolan (talk) 20:36, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per WP:HEY. Change of !vote. Good rescue by ScottyNolan. Bearian (talk) 22:13, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. @ScottyNolan @Bearian UWW is the governing sports org and thus fails independence, as does the government sports website. Medaling (or meeting any sport-specific SNG) is entirely irrelevant to notability if IRS SIGCOV has not been identified. The Montsame pieces are utterly routine and trivial primary event recaps, they do not count toward notability. And anyway, GNG requires multiple sources of IRS SIGCOV, which means the Montsame coverage would be insufficient even if it was SIGCOV. JoelleJay (talk) 13:31, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  Received. Bearian (talk) 15:14, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep Page passes WP:NATHLETE he has won medals at notable international competitions and per Bearian there are sources that can be added to the page to bolster credibility. Agnieszka653 (talk) 16:43, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

  I would like to have more added during this process, and not some hypothetical future. I don't know enough about the reliability of the sources to help. Bearian (talk) 17:17, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

  @Agnieszka653 he does not pass NSPORT as that requires demonstration of IRS SIGCOV and no qualifying sources have been identified. JoelleJay (talk) 11:49, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Rasha Thadani

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Rasha Thadani
• Articles for deletion/Rasha Thadani (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Rasha Thadani (3rd nomination)

Rasha Thadani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Plenty of WP:NEWSORGINDIA but not significant coverage to meet GNG or ANYBIO. Yes, she may fall under WP:NACTOR but still needs to have the coverage to support per ANYBIO. I do not see it here. CNMall41 (talk) 05:53, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and India. CNMall41 (talk) 05:54, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Maharashtra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:40, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep - clears GNG from the Hindustan Times source, the The Statesman source, and the NDTV source, and also definitely clears NACTOR through major roles in two notable productions (Azaad Srinivasa Mangapuram) Jishara (talk) 13:42, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Delete and Draftify The article still needs much better sources to cite.

1. Two of the sources are from Asian News International (see: WP:RSPANI) on which there still remains no consensus on WP:ICTFSOURCES.

2. As already mentioned by User:CNMall41, most of the sources are WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Particularly this interview of hers for Femina appears quite WP:NEWSORGINDIA.

3. Also churnalism. 'Who is Rasha Thadani' by NDTV is literally a web story. A very low-quality citation, in my humble opinion.

4. This The Hindu citation (ref. no. 9 and 10) and this The Hindu citation (ref. no. 15) are duplicate references (see: WP:DUPCITES) and one should be removed and other invoked.

5. Only five citations (see note for latter) have bylines, the rest are published by 'entertainment desk' or similar names.

Note: In this citation, the article claims it's written by Vinita Kumar but when you go through it, you see her name nowhere but rather 'India Today Entertainment Desk.' At the end, 'published by Anurag Bohra' is mentioned.

References

Honeybrowneyes (talk) 15:26, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Secular Culture & Ideas

Secular Culture & Ideas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:NORG. Now defunct, so unlikely there will be any future coverage to establish notability. Redirect to Posen Foundation, its chief underwriter, as WP:ATD. No need to merge WP:PRESSRELEASEs. Longhornsg (talk) 04:01, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, News media, Religion, Atheism, and Judaism. Longhornsg (talk) 04:01, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:45, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Pulmonary nodule

Pulmonary nodule (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The content of this article is about pulmonary nodules in elephants. Pulmonary nodules occur in other species, including humans. This either needs to be moved to pulmonary nodules in elephants, completely rewritten to cover to the topic of pulmonary nodules in general, or possibly deleted if there is no consensus to move to the existing article to pulmonary nodules in elephants. Plantdrew (talk) 03:47, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Medicine. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:39, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• this is a non-controversial Move that you could probably do without an AfD. I'm not entirely sure that the world needs an article on something so specific as pulmonary nodules in elephants, but it's got sources, it's probably right, so it's not a problem. It'd be great if someone extended it to a general article back at the present title, but since we can't guarantee anyone will do so in the near future, it's probably best to move it for the present, and let future developments take their course. Elemimele (talk) 10:59, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Move - agreed - the topic of this article is really specific but evidently has enough sources to function, and that article is pulmonary nodules in elephants so it should be at the correct spot. Jishara (talk) 13:22, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Speedy delete I believe this is LLM-created since it was all done in a single edit by an editor who's never made large contributions or edits on this kind of topic before and it uses the bolded, bulleted items. The Etiology section is cited to an article on Aspergillosis and doesn't seem relevant to that content or mention elephants in the abstract. None of the sources even include the word "nodule" at all! (though three of them only show abstracts, they don't really fit together to justify this article). Reywas92^Talk 15:10, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per Reywas92's justifications, seems to be a clear WP:NOLLM violation, and since it's not even remotely related to pulmonary nodules outside of elephant, it seems like there was no particular effort put in after the slop. Delete the page, and consider Admin Noticeboard action against the creator. Foxtrot620 (talk) 15:26, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Suspected AI-generated articles-related AfD discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:41, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Lillestrom, Saskatchewan

Lillestrom, Saskatchewan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It was suggested that this be discussed, and so here we are. The CGNDB describes this as a "locality", so that doesn't get us very far; the cited passage in the placenames book doesn't agree with the text of the article. It's not even clear that it's talking about the same place, given that there's no sign that there was ever a rail line through this area. A "locality" absolutely fails to pass WP:GEOLAND, so we need something here to convince us that the lack of a settlement on GMaps is what should rule here. Mangoe (talk) 02:18, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:30, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as the one who proposed discussing this place. This one isn't as much of a slam-dunk as Orland, Saskatchewan, due to the place-names book. But that by itself isn't enough and I can't find anything else. If this really was a settled place once then there should be more out there, and I'm open to changing my mind if sources can be found. Also, this is the place in the book. The remains of the rail line are visible cutting through the marshy area to the west of the coordinates, in the satellite photos. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 10:51, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  OK, now I see the old RR grade. Mangoe (talk) 14:29, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: Seems rather pointy. Has an entry in the CGNDB, appears in at least one book, many other hits on Google Books, passes NPLACE easily. MediaKyle (talk) 11:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Simply appearing in an national gazetteer is not enough: even ignoring classification errors (and we don't have enough experience with the CGNDB to assess that), this isn't classified as a settlement there, so it's good for the name and location, and that's it. These listing include all sorts of places we wouldn't consider notable. And placename books are a spotty resource, and again, we don't have a lot of experience with this one; but it doesn't come out and say it was anything but a stop on the railroad with a post office. Also, I must reiterate, neither source states the chief claim for the nature of the place as given in the article. Mangoe (talk) 14:28, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  You seem to have taken exception to my statement in the other AfD. I do have enough experience with the CGNDB to know that it does not suffer any of the same problems as GNIS, and inclusion in the CGNDB satisfies the "legal recognition" part of NPLACE. Lillestrom is clearly populated, and has been populated for over 100 years based on what I'm seeing on Newspapers.com... If the article content is wrong, then the article needs to be edited, not deleted. In any case, even if we had literally nothing to say about this place, it does exist, so the solution in this case would be to redirect it to the community or municipality it is apart of. In this case, the target would be Rural Municipality of Hillsborough No. 132. I think we have enough to retain it as a standalone article, though. MediaKyle (talk) 14:45, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  I feel I must continue to reserve judgement on the "legal recognition" thing, but how many times do I have to point out that even if the classification given in CNGDB is authoritative, it defines the place as a "locality", which is not something that passes muster under WP:GEOLAND. And no, I long ago set aside the "wrong is not a reason to delete," because a false article is worse than no article at all. If you have all these sources, then edit the article and correct it, or cite what it says. And if you can fix its problems, I'll be happy to change my response here. But until then, no. Mangoe (talk) 15:51, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  What, precisely, do you think a locality is? Because it varies by province... In Nova Scotia, localities are a smaller area, sometimes with and sometimes without legally defined boundaries, included within the boundary of an unincorporated community. There are some localities which are independently notable, and some which redirect to the community they are apart of. For Saskatchewan, I'm less sure, but "locality" in this case seems to be closer to "unincorporated community"... There's only three "localities" within the Rural Municipality of Hillsborough No. 132, and they don't appear to be apart of other communities. I guess I'll go ahead and make a few edits to the article... MediaKyle (talk) 16:07, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Verena Metze-Mangold

Verena Metze-Mangold (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the sources are primary and merely confirm she held roles. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 02:15, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, Politics, and Germany. LibStar (talk) 02:15, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Joemy Wilson

Joemy Wilson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician. Only ref is archived here, notes only "appointed to fill a vacant seat on TGHS’s Board of Directors in January 2017." No significant hits in web search. HalJor (talk) 02:12, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related AfD discussions. HalJor (talk) 02:12, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Connecticut. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:33, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Weak keep as there is a short AllMusic bio here, and staff-written reviews here, here, and here. Haven't done a full search yet, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:37, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Bruce's Walk

Bruce's Walk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Limited claim for notability, all content of the article is included in the bulluburra page. Pencilceaser123 (talk) 01:57, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Australia. Pencilceaser123 (talk) 01:57, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Nanshi Cuisine Street

Nanshi Cuisine Street (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been tagged for no citations since 2020. I have not located independent sources aside from travel promotions. I removed much of promotional information, but did not think any sources I found were enough to establish actual notability. USnoozieULoozie (talk) 22:18, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Business, and China. USnoozieULoozie (talk) 22:18, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

  • Keep. Makes NGEO. Khalitate (talk) 06:00, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features)#Engineered constructs says:

  Buildings, including private residences, transportation facilities and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability.

  Sources

  1. Chen, Xuejian, ed. (2008). Travel Around China: The Guide to Exploring the Sites, the Cities, the Provinces, and More. New York: HarperCollins. p. 352. ISBN 978-0-06-1473548. Retrieved 2026-07-25 – via Internet Archive.

     The book notes: "Nanshi Food Street is located in Nanshi, the bustling old commercial center in Tianjin, where not only gourmet cuisines and tasty snacks from across the country are sold, but also the architecture has a unique style. The entire food street is like a palace that looks simple and solemn. It is currently the largest contemporary market engaged in special food brands and local products. There are the traditional cuisines from Sichuan, Shandong, Guangdong, Hunan, Jiangsu and Zhejiang; the folk snacks with sweet, salty, dry, and watery tastes; Italian and Russian-style food and snacks; food from mountain villages; seasonal seafood; simple village meals; and gourmet cuisine. With its unique charm as a scenic spot in Tianjin, Nanshi Food Street has attracted many tourists."

  2. O'Connell, Darren; Bindloss, Joe, eds. (2025). Lonely Planet China (17 ed.). Oakland: Lonely Planet. ISBN 978-1-80653-008-3. Retrieved 2026-07-25 – via Google Books.

     The book notes: "Walking around Tianjin will work up an appetite. If you want a smorgasbord of options, head to Nanshi Cuisine Street (南市食品街, Nánshì Shípǐn Jiē), not quite 2km from Ancient Culture Street and Marco Polo Square, respectively. This indoor food court has a high glass ceiling and tile concourse, and the walls are lined with about 100 food stalls. You can wander from hot-plate to chafing dish and sample a wide range of snacks and lunches, including live fish cooked on the spot. The contained environment allows you to order street food without standing in the actual street. Seating is limited, but Nanshi is a cosy escape on rainy days. You can also try a takeaway picnic in Nanshi Park across the street."

  3. Law, Eugene (2004). Intercontinental's Best of China. Beijing: China Intercontinental Press. p. 134. ISBN 978-7-5085-0429-2. Retrieved 2026-07-25 – via Google Books.

     The book notes: "For those who are hungry to dip their chopsticks into Chinese dishes of various flavors, the Nanshi Food Street (nán shì shí pǐn jiē 南市食品街provides some of the country's best choices. It's particularly known for its seafood, culled from the port area of Tanggu. In typical Chinese custom, the fish is brought live to your table for your pre-cooking approval before being prepared."

  4. "Coming into its own". China Daily. 2012-09-28. Factiva CDUSWE0020120928e89s0000m. Factiva CDEUWE0020120928e89s0000p. Archived from the original on 2026-07-25. Retrieved 2026-07-25.

     The article notes: "First-time visitors should head to Nanshi Food Street to try a wide range of traditional snacks such as the Goubuli steamed stuffed buns, Er Duoyan fried cake and 18th Street fried dough twists. Built in 1984, the street is located in prosperous Nanshi business area, next to Heping Road."

  5. "Tianjin - A tale of two cities". China Economic Review. 1998-04-01. Factiva qedcer0020010926du410001f. Archived from the original on 2026-07-25. Retrieved 2026-07-25.

     The article notes: "The best place to go is Nanshi Food Street, just west of the centre, a two-storey mall with more than 100 outlets, ranging from cheap snack stalls to gourmet banqueting halls."

  6. Zhang, Dongya (2008-07-25). "Fried treats and ancient streets". Beijing Today. p. 21. Retrieved 2026-07-25 – via Internet Archive.

     The article notes: "Nanshi Hotel and Food Street. In the center of the city, castle-like twin structures stand side by side: one is the Food Street and the other the Hotel Street. Food Street is a square block gated at each end. Its restaurants represent both new and traditional names in Tianjin, serving all eight major cuisines including Sichuan, Guangdong (Cantonese), Hunan and Shandong cuisine. Walk around the street and you can sample a taste of everything: imperial food, seafood and local snacks."

  7. Wang, Qicheng 王麒诚 (2007). China Tour Guide: Cartoons. Beijing: China Intercontinental Press. p. 41. ISBN 978-7-5085-1332-4. Retrieved 2026-07-25 – via Internet Archive.

     The book notes: "The Nanshi Food Street brings together the cuisines of Sichuan, Shandong, Hunan and Jiangsu Provinces and has more than 140 kinds of specialty snacks. There is also Russian-style and Italian-style food as well as other delicacies. Nanshi Food Street is a large three-floor castle of delicacies with four gate towers. Two passages cross in the centre where cuisines from various places in China can be found. One can enjoy a gourmet's choice to the full there."

  8. Gu, Gang 顾钢; Yang, Ying 杨颖; Shen, Haiping 沈海萍; Yang, Ying 杨瑛, eds. (2015). 大学英语阅读与文化翻译 [College English: Reading and Cultural Translation 3]. Beijing: Higher Education Press. p. 135. ISBN 978-7-04-042861-2. Retrieved 2026-07-25 – via Internet Archive.

     The book notes: "The Nanshi Food Street was built in 1984 and was rated as one of the ten tourist attractions in Tianjin by the municipal administration in 1988. Styled after the imperial palace, the architecture of Nanshi Food Street looks imposing, simple and elegant. The Street is well known as a Food Castle. It has more than 100 restaurants of great variety, gathering Chinese eight cuisines. Here you may find dishes from many places in China and those from foreign countries, plus such local snacks as the Three Unique Delicacies of Tianjin (Erduoyan Zhagao, Shibajie Mahua and Goubuli Baozi) and snacks from other cities."

  9. Carroll, Jeanie (2010). Tianjian Basics. Beijing: China Intercontinental Press. p. 99. ISBN 978-7-5085-1834-3. Retrieved 2026-07-25 – via Internet Archive.

     The book notes: "Food Streets abound in Tianjin with Nanshi Food Street being one of the more fa-mous. The architecture alone is enough for going there, not to mention the over 100 restaurants and food shops that line the 40,000 square meter location. Nanshi Food Street resembles an ancient Chinese city on three floors with a glass roof and beautiful fountains. The entrances to the food street are adorned by four gates called Zhen Yu, Xing Ge, Zhong Sheng and Hua Yu or as the acronym implies Rejuvenating China. Nanshi Street is full of the daily hustle and bustle of this active city. Tianjin boasts local snacks, dishes of the Eight Styles of Chinese Cookery and Tianjin's local fare along with most of the foods from around the world. There is a large Muslim population in Tianjin so there is no shortage of Islamic cuisine."

  10. Malloy, Ruth Lor (1990) [1975]. Fielding's People's Republic of China 1990 (4 ed.). New York: Fielding Travel Books. William Morrow and Company. p. 464. ISBN 0-688-08449-4. Retrieved 2026-07-25 – via Internet Archive.

      The book notes: "The Nanshi Food Street has three stories of shops, restaurants, wine shops, and tea houses. The food here is from all over China and abroad, and includes typical Tianjin snacks such as goubuli (steamed meat dumpling), erduoyan (fried cake), and shibajie (deep-fried dough twist). We found it too dirty to be appetizing. Please let us know if they clean things up as the concept is great."

  11. Cui, Xinyao 崔新耀 (2026-07-23). Sun, Yifan 孙一凡; Pan, Xuhai 潘旭海 (eds.). "焕新升级！天津南市食品街将打造天津"美食新空间"" [Revamped and Upgraded! Tianjin Nanshi Food Street Set to Become a "New Culinary Destination"]. People's Daily (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2026-07-25. Retrieved 2026-07-25.

      The article notes: "据介绍，南市食品街围绕“首重历史保护、植入绿色景观、引入先进业态、融合商文旅研、优化布局动线”进行焕新改造，诚邀具有“烟火气”的老字号品牌、传统美食、创新美食等本地品类与全国各地菜系，具有“松弛感”的首店、特色店、年轻潮流店等年轻业态，以及具有“人文韵”特色的非遗品牌合作入驻。"

      From Google Translate: "According to reports, the revitalization of Nanshi Food Street focuses on prioritizing historical preservation, integrating green landscaping, introducing advanced business formats, blending commerce, culture, tourism, and research, and optimizing the spatial layout and visitor flow. The project invites a diverse range of tenants: local heritage brands and traditional or innovative cuisines that capture the authentic "vibe of daily life" (bustling local atmosphere); "first-store" concepts, specialty shops, and trendy youth-oriented stores that offer a "relaxed, leisurely" experience; and Intangible Cultural Heritage brands that embody "cultural charm.""

  12. "南市食品街" [Nanshi Food Street]. ENorth (in Chinese). 2011-12-13. Archived from the original on 2026-07-25. Retrieved 2026-07-25.

      The article notes: "而天津的食品街却独创了“集八方名菜于一处，揽四方游客聚一餐”的先例，使“众口尽调一街中”。天津食品街建成于l 984年，经各方通力协作，百日建成，各种风味饮食商店随即开业。高约数丈的灰色围墙，把食品街围成一个正正方方的四方形，城内十字交叉的两条大街，把食品街均分为四个分区，沿街设有上下三层店铺。第二层由环绕全街的平台式回廊相贯通，形成一个立体、开放、方便的服务区。底层多是经营各色地方风味的小吃，五湖四海的绝技都在此占地摆摊，竞相献艺。"

      From Google Translate: "Tianjin’s Food Street pioneered a unique concept: gathering famous dishes from all corners of the country and bringing together travelers from far and wide to dine in a single location—truly a place where "every palate finds satisfaction on one street." Completed in 1984 through a massive, concerted effort that saw construction finished in just one hundred days, the street immediately opened for business with shops offering a wide array of culinary styles. Towering grey walls enclose the street in a perfect square; two intersecting main avenues divide the area into four quadrants, with shops arranged across three levels. A continuous, platform-style corridor links the second-floor shops, creating an open, multi-level, and accessible service area. The ground floor is largely dedicated to diverse local snacks, where vendors from across the nation showcase their unique culinary skills and specialties."

  13. Zhang, Yongli 张永利 (2025-02-27). "掌门人说老字号 石头门坎：探索老字号饮食新生态" [A Brand Leader Discusses "Shitou Menkan": Exploring a New Ecosystem for Heritage Food Brands]. Tianjin Daily (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2026-07-25. Retrieved 2026-07-25.

      The article notes: "时光流转至1984年，为恢复传统餐饮、改善老旧街区，天津南市食品街建成开业，“石头门坎”入驻其中，在食客中再掀热潮。在石头门坎素包制作技艺第四代传承人尚秀英的记忆中，食品街开业时红红火火，我们的素包供不应求，消费者往往需排队一两个小时才能买到包子。到上世纪90年代末，和很多餐饮老字号企业一样，“石头门坎”的经营也陷入困境，下一步该怎么走？"

      From Google Translate: "Fast forward to 1984, and to revive traditional dining and improve old neighborhoods, Tianjin Nanshi Food Street was built and opened. "Shitou Menkan" (Stone Threshold) moved in, creating a new wave of popularity among diners. Shang Xiuying, the fourth-generation inheritor of the Shitou Menkan vegetarian bun-making technique, recalls the bustling opening of the food street; their vegetarian buns were in high demand, and customers often had to queue for one or two hours to buy them. By the late 1990s, like many time-honored catering businesses, "Shitou Menkan" faced difficulties. What should they do next?"

  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Nanshi Food Street (Chinese: 南市食品街; pinyin: Nánshì Shípǐn Jiē) to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

  Cunard (talk) 09:59, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 00:46, 30 July 2026 (UTC)