Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a4054892cc0a4bba

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RFP)
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection).

After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to remove obvious vandalism.


Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level

Request removal of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level

Request a specific edit be made to a protected page

Request the non-urgent protection of multiple pages that do not require immediate administrator attention


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – as with the talk pages for other gen AI related stuff, people just spam their prompts here, absolutely no constructive edits. Toketaatalk 14:43, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:35, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ᴸᵃᶠᶠʸTaffer💬(they/she) In solidarity 15:09, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. For a week. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page per WP:CT/BLP and WP:CT/SA if there isn't one already. Daniel Case (talk) 21:40, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Entire history page is dotted with reverts. Also one socking vandal who has intention to continue socking. Starlet! (Need to talk?) (Library) (Sandbox) 15:20, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

IP address(es) blocked by Daniel Case. For two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 21:47, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – previously had a 1 year protection, time for indefinite. Toketaatalk 15:37, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/AP because the naming issue underlies the edit warring Daniel Case (talk) 21:57, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I don't know what is happening with the page history (I have never seen a page history like this one before), but it seems like there is a lot of reverts, so I guess semi protect??? This is so weird... Toketaatalk 15:44, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I have seen many page histories like this before, and from such a paucity of reverts we usually presume that the editors on the page are working things out for themselves as we encourage them to. Daniel Case (talk) 22:02, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Toketaatalk 16:23, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

User(s) blocked: Tategeraghty (talk · contribs) blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. indefinitely. While they were not the only editor reverted, they were the last, and there have been no other since them. Daniel Case (talk) 22:05, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Toketaatalk 16:24, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:10, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Jdcomix (talk) 16:36, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

One of those recreations was actually a WP:REFUND request, albeit one that shouldn't have been done. G11 generally isn't a speedy criterion that can be REFUNDed. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Look out it's Jimothy! 17:26, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Either way the account got blocked, so I don't think action will be needed unless they sock. Jdcomix (talk) 17:27, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Declined per above discussion. Daniel Case (talk) 22:10, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Long term vandalism target but not happening often enough for semi, PC it is. Toketaatalk 16:42, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Pending changes–protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:13, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Reason: Persistent vandalism from a number of different IP addresses, though I suspect, from the type of edits, that is one person. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 16:53, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC timesink, no constructive edits. Toketaatalk 17:17, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – A recent, very sneaky bit of vandalism that had fake citations so they didn't get picked up as unreferenced BLP, bogus claims Varane had played for Como, Northeast United and Liverpool. Edlectro28 (talk) 17:21, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Reason: Mr. John Wahl is the Republican nominee for Lieutenant Governor in Alabama. The AL Republican party held its primaries on May 19th, 2026, with the run-off (Mr. Wahl was a part of the run-off) being held on June 16th, 2026. Around those dates and as well as the last couple of weeks, a plethora of editors have come through making various edits to the page, some innocent, others to paint him in an overly negative or overly positive light.

At least from the date this request is reviewed, until AFTER the general election occurs on November 3rd, we request Extended Confirmed Protection (ECP) for Mr. Wahl's page.

We request this level and duration of protection as the View History indicates an uptick in mass edits and deletions occur around the election dates, and we would like to prevent that to maintain as accurate a page on Mr. Wahl as possible.

Please reach out if any further details are required. Thank you! StripedDemocracy (talk) 20:50, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection., also @StripedDemocracy: Who is this 'we'? - The Bushranger One ping only 22:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mellk (talk) 21:05, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Andrew5 target. Jdcomix (talk) 21:21, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The Bushranger One ping only 22:17, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A5 target. Jdcomix (talk) 21:23, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The Bushranger One ping only 22:16, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Reason: Edit warring ~2026-51647-99 (talk) 21:29, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. The Bushranger One ping only 22:12, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Reason: Temporary Account Again and Again Changing Date of Birth Dark Knight Editor (talk) 21:41, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Most edits in the past are TAs disruptively changing pronouns. International Fujita scale (talk) 21:50, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The Bushranger One ping only 22:11, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Indefinite full protection: User talk page of deceased user. User page of user has been salted. International Fujita scale (talk) 21:56, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Not done User pages of deceased users are full-protected. User talk pages of deceased users are not. The Bushranger One ping only 22:06, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Reason: Several temporary accounts have been persistently adding the incorrect description that it is a "comedy horror" when the franchise has never been a comedy series and the film itself, when compared to comedy horror like Shaun of the Dead, is decidedly NOT a comedy. NarutoSan6000 (talk) 22:12, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

In addition, the accounts have also been ignoring the invisible note placed warning them NOT to add "comedy" to the description. User Giorgio, Destroyer of Brio actually proposed that we request protection in a post on the talk page of the article. NarutoSan6000 (talk) 22:34, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request removal of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level

Unprotection: TRYUNPROT, only 8 edits since indef protection in 2024, I think this would be okay to trial unprotect. Toketaatalk 14:54, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply

(Non-administrator comment) That could well mean semi-protection is doing its job. The associated talk page has seen several instances of juvenile disruption since protection, presumably from kids who would otherwise have vandalized the article itself, suggesting there is still a risk of problems returning. This is not a low-traffic page (average of 464 daily views over the past month) and it cannot be confirmed that there are a reasonable number of watchers. PCP may well be needed if protection is reduced at all. Entranced98 (talk) 15:10, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply
@Entranced98 how do you figure out daily views? Toketaatalk 15:19, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Enter the page name into pageviews.wmcloud.org and a graph will appear showing page views, along with a daily average for any time period that you can specify on the website. Entranced98 (talk) 15:22, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Million dollar homepage averages 200 pageviews with a random spike yesterday. Toketaatalk 15:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Unprotection: 150 average page views, protected before PC existed, inactive admin, change to temp PC to trial this. Toketaatalk 15:53, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Unprotection: Averages 15 daily page views, the school doesn't even exist anymore. Protecting admin retired. Definitely doesn't need the lock. Toketaatalk 16:04, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Unprotection: Averages 5 daily page views, protected in 2011, lock is unneeded, protecting admin inactive. Toketaatalk 16:06, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Unprotection: 2 average daily page views, protected 15 years ago, protecting admin retired, should be fine for an unprotection. Toketaatalk 16:26, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Unprotection: Similarily to COVID-19 which got changed to semi in January 2026, this doesn't need to have extended confirmed protection, averages 65 daily page views, either change to semi or even PC. Toketaatalk 17:47, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply

also unprotect the talk page too. Toketaatalk 17:48, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Reason: Last protected in 2011. Any vandals would have long gone now 15 years has elapsed. LibStar (talk) 06:34, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Note: The page was not protected due to vandalism. It was protected due to extensive, long-term, and severe BLP violations, including some by an editor claiming to be the subject. (Also, you'd think vandals would be long gone after 15 years, but we have multiple LTAs who, unfortunately, would disagree.) - The Bushranger One ping only 18:17, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit be made to a protected page


Change “Collapse of the June ceasefire (July)” to “Collapse of the June ceasefire (20 June - 31 July)” because the June ceasefire ended on 19 June, not 30 June. ~2026-47054-03 (talk) 00:02, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.