Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a4512a6ea93b376a

Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/India

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion and merging of articles related to India. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion and neither does removing an AfD from this page remove it from the main page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:deletion sorting|India|sig=~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to India. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Asia.

Purge page cache watch

India

[edit]
Neha Bora (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The cited sources are predominantly routine, event-based coverage of protests involving the subject, rather than significant, sustained independent coverage of Neha Bora herself. The available sourcing does not appear sufficient to establish standalone notability. Stormbird (talk) 18:54, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply

-- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:37, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Gowri Savithri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of Draft:Gowri S in mainspace immediately after being declined at AfC yet again for lack of notability. Then author hopped to a new account and started padding it (potentially with LLM insertions). ChompyTheGogoat [ Bleat | Munched ] 14:03, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Nadeem Naqvi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating this article for AfD on the behalf of ~2026-53254-19. THEZDRX (User) | (Contact) 12:04, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Their reasoning is:

I am nominating this article for deletion because I believe the subject's notability as an academic has not been adequately established under Wikipedia's relevant notability guidelines.

The article currently has a notability concern, and I have not found sufficient significant, independent coverage demonstrating that the subject meets the applicable criteria.

I also believe the article should be reviewed under Wikipedia's policies concerning biographies of living persons, particularly where claims are contentious or insufficiently supported by reliable independent sources.

I have no personal involvement in creating the article and am making this request based on Wikipedia's inclusion and sourcing policies. ~2026-53254-19 (talk) 11:34, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply

I have no opinion on this AfD. THEZDRX (User) | (Contact) 12:08, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Mumbai Delhi Mumbai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Satish Rajwade or Mumbai-Pune-Mumbai because the film has no independent notability. No reliable film reviews. Only sources found in a WP:BEFORE were , , , and . DareshMohan (talk) 22:39, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply


AutoCAST (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable product, website is dead, does not meet criteria for notability Likeanechointheforest (talk) 19:08, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Mothuka, Faridabad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. the sources presented in the talkpage are insufficient enough on their own to meet V Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:08, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Gunjan Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No indication of proper notability. Pirateofthewest (talk) 08:06, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Delete – WP:RUNOFTHEMILL scholar; Google returns unrelated results when searching for the name. I did not see anything that suggests my initial instinct is off, but if someone has sources to prove otherwise feel free to ping me as I have not dug too deep here. –Maltazarian ᚾparleyinvestigateᛅ 11:11, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Delete - As pointed out by Pirateofthewest, it fails WP:GNG and doesn't provide much information. With kind regards, Blint (talk) 14:38, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Delete - Complete failure of GNG & NAUTHOR. LegacyWiki (talk) 13:47, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Rana Kapur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One-sentence article about a person who lived in the early 11 century. Only two sources, one of which is a Census from 1991 relating to Kapurthala, not the subject. No SIGCOV found to establish notability. ScottyNolan (talk) 07:52, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

you may keep the article, or merge it with the page Kapurthala. i can share three more reliable sources except the one already provided. i agree that census source may not be reliable. the other three sources are:
1:The Sikh Reference Book By Harajindara Siṅgha Dilagīra · 1997. written by a historian.
2: https://www.google.com/books/edition/Punjab_District_Gazetteers_Sangrur/ThduAAAAMAAJ?hl=en p-21
3: https://www.google.com/books/edition/Punjab/U44BAAAAMAAJ?hl=en p-176
talk
DavidSchop DavidSchop (talk) 12:34, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Tufanganj Mahavidyalaya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:47, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Diu College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:28, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Smit Machchhar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose this article for deletion as the pilot likely does not warrant his own page. The information contained in this article is largely covered in the article referring to the flydubai incident Tibs foxxo (talk) 21:27, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

They don't even mention it in the main article, even though it was requested in the discussion it be redirected. ~2026-52430-58 (talk) 02:53, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
The article is very new and is developing, if redirected it would be added as a target in the article. – LuniZunie(talk) 02:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
If the nomination is rejected, I can help to improve the article, as the subject is notable. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 04:19, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Redirect for now I agree with alot of the "keep votes" but we need to wait untill that happens, a person is not notable at a current point in time just because they might get a medal in the future. shane (talk to me if you want!) 13:14, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Thanks for saying you agree with a lot of the keep commenters, predicated upon receipt of future awards and honours. Since your comment, that has now occurred, and the individual has already received multiple honours, and been nominated for multiple more awards at the federal governmental wide level. Princessa Unicorn (talk) 19:54, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Keep ~2026-52950-87 (talk) 14:56, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
@~2026-52950-87: This is an argument to avoid. You should provide an in-depth reasoning why this article shouldn't be deleted. Simply saying "keep" and calling it a day won't possibly change the outcome. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:51, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Redirect per WP:BLP1E, no merge as it looks very LLMish. He will likely independently reach SIGCOV in the near future with some kind of influencer career or whatnot but clearly that is not the case now Mausfield (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Anything remotely resembling large language model usage is now gone. Thank you, Princessa Unicorn (talk) 20:53, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Note: Ah, this was already resolved previously, and echoed by Andrew Davidson (talk · contribs), here . Thank you, Princessa Unicorn (talk) 17:28, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Redirect per WP:BLP1E and WP:NOTNEWS (namely point 3 "Who's who", which is very similar to BLP1E). News may cover his background but politicians and heads of state praising him as a "hero" does not change the fact that he is only notable for this single event, and there is ultimately not much additional notable information from the main article, most of it about the incident itself; any relevant career history and the status of his recovery can be added there.
I believe it is too soon for him to receive a separate article under the assumption of further coverage and post-crash fame like Al Haynes, and the earlier referenced pilots/passengers of US Airways Flight 1549 and the 9/11 hijackings which themselves are much more significant incidents that continue to be referenced to this day. Plus, his role in the incident itself is actually not as significant as these examples since he was incapacitated after fighting against the first officer and opening the cockpit door, and it was other passengers and off-duty pilots who regained control of the plane. –Sonicwave talk 18:40, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Merge with Flydubai Flight 1073 and Redirect Just as the reasons above, the current informations on the page isn't warrant for an independent page - apart from the aviation incident part, while the rest of the contents can simply be merged with the incident article. Once we have more information that suggesting the pliot deserve his page, we can write a new article all over again.
Awdqmb (talk) 18:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Redirect There's not a single reference on the page dated before 30 September, and the possibility of him someday receiving more notoriety doesn't make up for the lack of current coverage independent of the event. Tuirse (talk ☘︎) 18:58, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Comment: Perhaps in the future, Machchhar will hold an important position in the aviation industry or become a philanthropist; however, I feel that the English Wikipedia is being too hasty in wanting to delete the entry for someone who achieved something remarkable. Fortunately, the article is being expanded into other languages ​​where the feat is recognized. I believe the article should be moved to a draft and we should see what happens in 60 days. I checked the main article again, and the short BLP biography does not appear there. ~2026-52430-58 (talk) 19:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Merge with existing article. Great achievement (talk) 19:05, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
I believe we should actually keep it. To honor such a brave and strong captain, does need some recognition. But we should only keep it if he agrees to. FlyArc350 (talk) 19:43, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
This is not the purpose of Wikipedia. Cubnorth (talk) 22:59, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
just add to existing article lah. Great achievement (talk) 18:44, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Merge with existing article. Not enough info for a whole independent article, but this person's life and story obviously can't be ignored on Wikipedia. ~2026-51187-32 (talk) 20:12, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Keep per Wi1-ch. Cheromaniii (talk) 20:27, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Note: Front page at The Wall Street Journal, significant coverage:
    • Pokharel, Krishna; Hassan, Aakash, "The 38-Year-Old Captain Who Fought Off Cockpit Attack on FlyDubai Flight - Smit Machchhar is hailed for his heroism after being stabbed on Flight 1073", The Wall Street Journal, retrieved 1 October 2026
Thank you, Princessa Unicorn (talk) 20:52, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Thanks so much for your kind words, that is most appreciated. Princessa Unicorn (talk) 01:49, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Agree with you, can have two notable topics within the same larger topic. Thanks so much, Princessa Unicorn (talk) 01:54, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Ironically, the Ahmed Al-Ahmed (Bondi Beach shooting) page got taken down after posting this--or maybe it's temporarily down? Very interesting timing! AgentBlueberryPie (talk) 05:00, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Off-topic here, but FYI it didn't get "taken down", it was just draftified, i.e. moved to Draft:Ahmed Al-Ahmed (Bondi Beach shooting). Rosbif73 (talk) 12:43, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Keep - there is overwhelmingly major news as per WP:SIGCOV - it is unlikely he's going to be remembered for only one event considering he is still alive and is already being hailed as a Hero by India and Israel. So eventually you will see articles of the awards he gets. Nkulasingham (talk) 05:19, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Thank you, hopefully we have begun to reflet the significant coverage, in the article, after our improvement upon it recently post this deletion nomination starting. Princessa Unicorn (talk) 13:55, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Merge/redirect to Flydubai Flight 1073 per others Ahammed Saad (talk) 05:28, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Thanks very much, SomePacifisticGuy, for your kind words about my efforts to improve the content of this article. It's greatly appreciated. I agree with you that it qualifies for significant coverage at this point in time. Princessa Unicorn (talk) 13:58, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Weak Keep: Although I do agree with the aspect of WP:BLP1E, the amount of Significant independent coverage Smit Machchhar has got, like Reuters, BBC, CNN, The Hindu and others, Im inclined to place a Weak Keep for now. BengalMC talk 14:03, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Keep : this person, and his life away from this incident, now has significant coverage in major international media of multiple countries. Also now meets the general notability guideline. We have articles on a guy who started a garage band and did a couple of concerts that got very local media coverage; Smit Machachhar clearly meets a much higher standard for a notable-person BLP. N2e (talk) 14:33, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Keep The third condition that needs to be also met as per WP:BLP1E to not suffice for an article on Wikipedia states as follows:

The event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented.

The event, however, is significant and the individual's role in the event is also substantial, as elaborated by the Flydubai Flight 1073 article. Honeybrowneyes (talk) 15:05, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Thank you, Princessa Unicorn (talk) 17:48, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Well, John Ogonowski is also known for a single event; in fact, he was even honored posthumously. ~2026-53254-77 (talk) 22:09, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Well, than maybe his article should also be deleted. Also see WP:OTHERSTUFF.Tvx1 22:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Redirect. Clear case of WP:BLP1E and also WP:CFORK. The point of discussion is not whether this person should be covered on Wikipedia in any way but whether a standalone article for him is warranted. And the answer to that is a clearly no. There is no significant information regarding this person that cannot be adequatly covered in the article on the event. And that is something none of the keep !voters have adressed.Tvx1 22:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
    Per WP:CFORK: "Most types of content forks are acceptable". This is neither a POV fork nor a "page of the same type on the same subject", so I'm not sure how that's relevant.
    Plenty of votes, including my own, have addressed WP:BLP1E. All three conditions must be met, and there is a decent argument that the third one is not met in this case.
    ~50% of the article in its current form contains information that would not be suitable for the article on the event, including his early life and career. This has also been addressed by a plenty of votes, again including my own. KikiFur (talk) 01:12, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply
    But the early life and career sections are largely trivial and seem to be full of fluff to try and pad out the article. Anything noteworthy can be covered in the main article. Cubnorth (talk) 10:18, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply
    It is hurtful to hear this bad faith comment about the early life and career of this living person. Certainly, I'm attempting to carry out research and find information in cited sources in good faith. I agree with KikiFur that there is good information here that should remain in this article and would be overweighted if duplicated in the article about the air incident, itself. Thank you, Princessa Unicorn (talk) 12:10, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply
    An observation and opinion is not a bad faith comment. I appreciate the work that you're doing, but in my opinion, it feels like there's a view of more = better in this article, which is not necessarily the case when it comes to notability. A lot of the information does not appear relevant, and relies heavily on trivia and excessive quotations. Cubnorth (talk) 12:18, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply
    Respectfully and strongly disagree. But I also thank you for your appreciation of the good faith work I am doing to improve this article with referenced sources. Thank you. Princessa Unicorn (talk) 12:22, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Keep. First, I think he already passes per WP:GNG based on the coverage. Secondly, he passes even per WP:BLP1E. According to WP:BLP1E, 3 conditions should be satisfied to avoid having the page about the person. 3rd condition: The event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented. John Hinckley Jr., for example, has a separate article because the single event he was associated with, the Reagan assassination attempt, was significant, and his role was both substantial and well documented. But this is exactly such a case here. The role of this pilot was central and well-documented in the event: while being badly injured, he unlocked the cockpit door, which saved all the passengers and the crew. My very best wishes (talk) 00:25, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply
    Agree with your keep comments with regards to significant amount of coverage, as well as the central role in the story, and the continued coverage about him that continues to increase. Princessa Unicorn (talk) 22:24, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Keep Although the pilot may now be famous for a one-off incident of this nature, its his heroic act to save the pilots in the Flydubai Flight 1073 that warrants him becoming a notable personality in aviation fraternity. Hence I believe this subject passes WP:GNG. There are numerous examples on pilots having their own mainspace Wikipedia article including the likes of Abhinandan Varthaman, and Indian pilot who was captured by Pakistan during the 2019 Jammu and Kashmir airstrikes. Abishe (talk) 00:31, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply
There is also the case of Patrick Argüello and Leila Khaled and the attempted hijacking during the Dawson's Field hijackings; the identity of the Omani attacker is gradually coming to light, so I believe Smit Machchhar is becoming a significant figure two days after the incident. ~2026-53150-74 (talk) 01:44, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Thanks so much for your keep comments, and I would agree with you that the model is similar to other heroic aviators that have received sustained coverage over time. Princessa Unicorn (talk) 22:23, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Glossary of Indian culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems indiscriminate collection of glossary of Indian culture with no clear inclusion criteria. Fails WP:LISTN. Asteramellus (talk) 21:59, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Museums in Kangla (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is pointless content forking. The individual museums could have their own articles, and this content is adequately included in Kangla. PepperBeast (talk) 00:46, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Grace Bible College (India) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:19, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply


HR College, Amnour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:20, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Ganga Singh College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:21, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply


D.A.V. Post-Graduate College, Siwan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:21, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Government Polytechnic, Patna-7 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:25, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Nedungayil Sankunni Narayanan Matriculation Higher Secondary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:27, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Kangla Sanathong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging because I think this is pointless content forking. It's an entrance to the Kangla, and should be returned to that context. PepperBeast (talk) 00:38, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Mata Jaswant Kaur Memorial School, Badal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Badal, Punjab#Education because this fails in GNG as well as WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE found nothing with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 15:31, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Kendriya Vidyalaya, Puranattukara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to List of Kendriya Vidyalayas#Kerala because this fails in GNG as well as WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE found nothing with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability....just some minor mentions out there. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 15:10, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Shri Gopinathji Maharaj (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Quite a vague and short article, unsourced since its creation, and I couldn't find reliable sources to indicate who the person was, or to demonstrate notability; that said, I wasn't able to search in non-English sources. I looked in enwiki articles, and it is possible that a redirect to Shuddhadvaita (his elder son Shri Gopinathji) or Gujarat#Notable_people may be appropriate as an alternative to deletion. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 12:49, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Russian Embassy School in Delhi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to List of Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia overseas schools because it lacks SIGCOV and also a redirect target was proposed as an ATD on the talkpage Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:33, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Rashmi Samant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable outside Oxford_University_Student_Union#Rashmi_Samant where the content is already found for years. See WP:GNG. Qualitist (talk) 05:55, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Keep main in a notable event and got strong coverage from that. SHe avoids BLP1e because she also got some following articles like that one from 2023, this one from 2023, this hindustan times from 2021, there's a full piece from hindustan times on her election, and this Hindu Post piece. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 22:57, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Keep. This biography should be assessed under WP:GNG and should not be conflated with the 2021 deletion of the separate event article "Rashmi Samant racism row", which was deleted pursuant to WP:EVENTCRIT. Whether a particular event merits a standalone article and whether a person is independently notable are distinct questions.

The subject has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources spanning several years. Coverage predates the controversy and includes standalone reporting on her election as the first Indian woman president of the Oxford University Student Union in February 2021 (The Times of India,"Oxford University Student Union gets first Indian female president". The Times of India. 13 February 2021. Mint,"Meet Rashmi Samant, first Indian female president of Oxford University Student Union". Mint. 13 February 2021. and Deccan Herald"Karnataka girl first Indian woman to become president of Oxford Student Union". Deccan Herald. 12 February 2021.).

Substantial coverage also extends beyond the Oxford SU episode. ThePrint published a standalone profile by Unnati Sharma in October 2023Sharma, Unnati (10 October 2023). "Rashmi Samant's life changed after Oxford row. She's an author, runs a company & is feted in BJP circles". ThePrint. examining the subject's subsequent activities, professional work and authorship. Additional coverage exists regarding her later public activities and published work, including coverage of her book A Hindu in OxfordSoni, Mallika (27 September 2023). "'We're treated badly': 1st Indian to head Oxford's student body in tell-all book". Hindustan Times..

This pattern of coverage is not limited to a single event. WP:BLP1E requires all three of its conditions to be met, and they are not: (1) sources do not cover her only in the context of a single event, as the 2023 ThePrint profile addresses her subsequent career and authorship; (2) she does not remain a low-profile individual, having since published two books and worked as a public commentator; and (3) the event was not insignificant, as the 2021 episode drew international coverage and was raised in the Indian Parliament by the External Affairs Minister. The continuing coverage years after the original controversy therefore weighs against a WP:BLP1E characterization.

Any overlap with content at Oxford University Student Union § Rashmi Samant is a question of article organization and editorial scope, not evidence of non-notability. Per WP:SUMMARYSTYLE and WP:PAGEDECIDE, duplication concerns can be addressed through editorial restructuring rather than deletion. NomadBaba (talk) 12:46, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

This SPA registered a few hours ago and has no edits outside this subject. Accesscrawl (talk) 14:20, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Delete. The relevant issue is not the number of citations but whether the sources provide significant independent coverage of Samant as a subject. The 2021 Times of India, Mint, Deccan Herald, ThePrint and Indian Express articles largely concern the same Oxford Student Union election/resignation controversy. The 2021 HinduPost article appears less useful for establishing independent coverage because of its close connection to the campaign supporting Samant.
The later 2023 sources are more relevant to the GNG question, particularly ThePrint's profile, although substantial portions of those articles still concern the Oxford episode and her account of it. The key question is therefore whether this later coverage constitutes sufficient significant independent coverage of Samant beyond the original event. In my view, it does not establish sufficient coverage to overcome the GNG/BLP1E concerns.
The fact that she has published books does not, by itself, establish notability under WP:GNG. The existence of the books is distinct from significant independent secondary-source coverage of Samant, and the relevant question remains whether the independent coverage of her as a subject is substantial and extends beyond the Oxford Student Union episode.
Likewise, the fact that Samant was mentioned in the Indian Parliament does not, by itself, establish that she meets WP:GNG. Parliamentary mention may demonstrate that the Oxford episode received political attention, but it is not equivalent to significant independent secondary-source coverage of Samant as a subject. Notability should therefore be assessed from the quality, independence and significance of the available coverage rather than from the fact that the matter was raised in Parliament. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-53265-09 (talk) 20:59, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply


G. Sreekanth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. No significant coverage from multiple reliable sources. Thilsebatti (talk) 03:38, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Vikas Pre-University College, Mangaluru (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:53, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Janhit College of Law (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:53, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Suryadeo Law College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:53, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Bhishma Narain Singh Law College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:53, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Nannapaneni Venkat Rao College of Engineering and Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Charlotte Swenson Memorial Bible Training School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:56, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Vidyanand Bapat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article centers around the subject and his campaign against noise pollution, which I do not believe is a reason for notability and does not meet WP:GNG. There are several articles, however, they all center around his campaign and one incident where he was assaulted. This reads more like a resume of his campaign rather than an encyclopedia article about a truly notable person. FiddleheadLady (talk) 00:53, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Keep - reading like a resume is not a reason for deletion per WP:Deletion is not cleanup. His campaign against noise pollution is basically his occupation and he's received a lot of coverage (in-article) from WP:RSs on it, plus a bit about him being assaulted also from reliable sources. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 23:01, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Keep - Bapat has made several arguments beyond the concerns about the noise pollution and encroachment of public spaces for religious festivals. For example, he has criticized religion as a right to do wrong , and also recommended against participating in the Pandharpur Vari. This has attracted police complaints against him for hurting religious sentiments . His peculiar vocabulary has created a cultural impact in form of contrasting his standard Marathi against the degrading quality of colloquial Marathi , and hundreds of independent social media influencers have produced viral videos mimicking his style. His activism against noise pollution has also left a political fallout in form of forcing various leaders in taking sides on the issue. The Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has taken cognizance of his demands . He has become a major flashpoint for state-wide socio-political debate on noise pollution laws , drawing reactions from prominent legal figures and civil rights organizations . The coverage is sustained and analytical, rather than a transient routine crime report. Per WP:ATD (Alternative to Deletion) and WP:CLEANUP, editing and rewriting should always be preferred over deletion. The underlying subject matter is thoroughly notable, and any issues with tone can be easily resolved through standard editing. Doctor joshi (talk) 15:16, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply


E.E.E. Sassoon High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:12, 22 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 06:21, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply


IPS Business School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:10, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply


MassCoMedia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:10, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Luit Academy Junior College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:10, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Dinakrushna College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:10, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Jaipur School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:10, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Shubham Rameshwar Kakde (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Further research reveals insufficient indication of significance or importance. Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:BASIC. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:42, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Maine Unko Sajan Chun Liya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All are promotional articles. Also This film has no single critic review after its release which makes the article not pass WP:NFILMS and WP:GNG. All the source are promotional press releases articles. User:Ronit creator talk— Preceding undated comment added 10:57, 25 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 12:27, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Sanki Daroga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This film has no critic review after its release which Clearly makes the article not pass WP:NFILMS and WP:GNG. All the source are promotional. First look poster etc. User:Ronit creator talk— Preceding undated comment added 09:54, 25 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 12:27, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Love Aur Rajneeti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This film has no critic review after its release which makes the article not pass WP:NFILMS and WP:GNG. All the source are promotional links. Wikipedia is not for promoting film. User:Ronit creator talk— Preceding undated comment added 10:00, 25 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 12:26, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Giorgia Andriani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Performing the second AfD step on behalf of a temporary account as requested at WT:AFD. I have no opinion on the actual proposal and won't watch this discussion.

Requesting AFD nomination for this page, reason is sources are mostly routine coverages and fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. ~2026-51391-43 (talk) 17:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

FaviFake (talk) 21:55, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:53, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Lean Keep as there are over 20 sources which list the subject in their titles, and the fuller coverage of the stand-alone worthy web series, which seems like more than "routine coverage" (wording from the nomination). I realize there is concern that Indian sourcing is less than ideal, but the amount of coverage here seems to indicate that GNG may have been met, but will watch the discussion in case the nominators or others can make a better case for deletion. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:43, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Delete I dont find anything notable as far as WP:GNG is concerned. Aeroes (talk) 16:40, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Kawan Kasoor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This film has no critic review after its release which Clearly makes the Article not meet WP:NFILMS and WP:GNG. WP need 2 or more critic review for notability but this film doesn't have one. User:Ronit creator talk— Preceding undated comment added 09:58, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 06:44, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Keep: As indian I knew in India have bollywood and bhojpuri cinema play key role in entertainment specially in North India bhojpuri films leads film industry. This film Even not regional. If we review Film script, director, and actors all have authentic background and have already wiki article so why not this page keep. Best J. Ansari Talk 16:30, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
    The director and actors (except the lead) have no Wikipedia articles themselves. This doesn't mean that the movie is not notable, but it can be a proximate indicator of its non-notability. Kelob2678 (talk) 16:38, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Shivangi Verma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than the routine coverage of cast & appearances, no significant in-depth coverage to statisfy WP:NBIO for inclusion on Wikipedia. Vestrian24Bio 13:22, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh (talk 🎮 sign) 17:58, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Thabaton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Keibu Keioiba because this is an unnecessary content fork PepperBeast (talk) 10:12, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Oppose Thabaton seems to have a lot of notability in her own right, from the analyses, and it'd be weird to go into those analyses of her in an article titled and focused on the tiger guy. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 19:40, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply
I think the Keibu Keioiba artice is a little unclear. Keibu Keioba is the title character in a Meitei folktake. Thabaton is another character in the same story. I'm not aware that Thabaton has any notability outside of Keibu Keioba. PepperBeast (talk) 04:07, 25 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Looks like the article is about the character, not the folktale. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 18:51, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 10:28, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Toro (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Kangjei (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kabo Loi (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Een Chingba (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lei Langba (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lamjel (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Heijing (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Torbung hunting (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I propose merging to Khamba and Thoibi because it is an unnecessary fork. PepperBeast (talk) 10:09, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 12:52, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Toro (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Kangjei (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kabo Loi (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Een Chingba (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lei Langba (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lamjel (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Heijing (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Torbung hunting (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I propose merging to Khamba and Thoibi because it is an unnecessary fork. PepperBeast (talk) 10:09, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 12:52, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Toro (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Kangjei (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kabo Loi (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Een Chingba (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lei Langba (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lamjel (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Heijing (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Torbung hunting (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I propose merging to Khamba and Thoibi because it is an unnecessary fork. PepperBeast (talk) 10:09, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 12:52, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Toro (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Kangjei (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kabo Loi (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Een Chingba (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lei Langba (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lamjel (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Heijing (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Torbung hunting (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I propose merging to Khamba and Thoibi because it is an unnecessary fork. PepperBeast (talk) 10:09, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 12:52, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Toro (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Kangjei (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kabo Loi (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Een Chingba (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lei Langba (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lamjel (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Heijing (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Torbung hunting (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I propose merging to Khamba and Thoibi because it is an unnecessary fork. PepperBeast (talk) 10:09, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 12:52, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Toro (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Kangjei (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kabo Loi (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Een Chingba (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lei Langba (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lamjel (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Heijing (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Torbung hunting (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I propose merging to Khamba and Thoibi because it is an unnecessary fork. PepperBeast (talk) 10:09, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 12:52, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Toro (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Kangjei (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kabo Loi (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Een Chingba (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lei Langba (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lamjel (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Heijing (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Torbung hunting (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I propose merging to Khamba and Thoibi because it is an unnecessary fork. PepperBeast (talk) 10:09, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 12:52, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Toro (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Kangjei (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kabo Loi (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Een Chingba (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lei Langba (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lamjel (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Heijing (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Torbung hunting (Khamba Thoibi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I propose merging to Khamba and Thoibi because it is an unnecessary fork. PepperBeast (talk) 10:09, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 12:52, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Kwatha Lai Haraoba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lai Haraoba in Myanmar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lai Haraoba in Tripura (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lai Haraoba in Bangladesh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I propose merging because I think this is better discussed in the context of Lai Haraoba. A lot of what's here is already covered at Lai Haoraoba or should be covered in Lai Haraoba. PepperBeast (talk) 07:02, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Comment: I merged 3 identical AfD subpages into this discussion per WP:FIXBUNDLE to avoid creating a mess, since the nom's statement was identical, the articles all have a similar length, and the nom was likely unaware of the WP:BUNDLE procedure. Feel free to undo that. FaviFake (talk) 14:09, 25 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Thanks! PepperBeast (talk) 04:15, 26 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh (talk 🎮 sign) 17:17, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Kwatha Lai Haraoba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lai Haraoba in Myanmar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lai Haraoba in Tripura (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Lai Haraoba in Bangladesh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I propose merging because I think this is better discussed in the context of Lai Haraoba. A lot of what's here is already covered at Lai Haoraoba or should be covered in Lai Haraoba. PepperBeast (talk) 07:02, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Comment: I merged 3 identical AfD subpages into this discussion per WP:FIXBUNDLE to avoid creating a mess, since the nom's statement was identical, the articles all have a similar length, and the nom was likely unaware of the WP:BUNDLE procedure. Feel free to undo that. FaviFake (talk) 14:09, 25 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Thanks! PepperBeast (talk) 04:15, 26 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh (talk 🎮 sign) 17:17, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Pana (Meitei culture) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If there were anything useful here, I'd suggest merging to Loiyumpa Silyel, but since it's really just a long list of untranslated titles, deletion should be fine. PepperBeast (talk) 06:30, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh (talk 🎮 sign) 17:17, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Gumaite Dao Sranto Rabire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable song lacking in significant coverage. I looked at sources and there was no significant coverage with only trivial mentions. Article also included copyrighted lyrics which I removed. Babin Mew (talk) 04:29, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 12:45, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Kurukh phonology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

page created using AI from the start, violation of WP:NEWLLM scope_creepTalk 05:01, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Does not qualify for soft deletion due to previous PROD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:16, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Zelio E-Mobility Limited (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of establishing notability Waynebobb (talk) 20:15, 22 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shocksingularity (talk) 05:38, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Delete. Despite the stock exchange listing, the coverage is routine corporate news, appointments, plant inaugurations, earnings snippets built on management quotes, plus database entries, which is WP:CORPTRIV rather than independent coverage. Onatic (talk) 23:09, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Muzamil Mahmood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. Most of the sources seems to be sponsored or promotional. Thilsebatti (talk) 17:42, 21 September 2026 (UTC)reply

  • @Thilsebatti The sources cited also include independent coverage. The fact that the subject is quoted in a few places as part of a wider article about his career does not make those articles interviews or promotional pieces. These comments r only a small part of the overall coverage and do not make the article promotional. If there is any evidence that the sources are sponsored, please point out which specific source you are referring to.Guy from Kashmir (talk)
  • Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and India. Thilsebatti (talk) 17:42, 21 September 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Keep: The subject has served as Head Coach at the highest level of Indian women’s football, the Indian Women's League, and has also worked as an A-coach at the men’s second-highest level with Real Kashmir FC, along with other recognised leagues. These are not merely local or routine appointments and have been independently documented by multiple reliable sources. There are references demonstrating the subject’s notability and relevance.

Ref: https://risingkashmir.com/the-glorious-journey-of-muzamil-mahmood Ref: https://khelnow.com/football/muzamil-mehmood-the-first-ever-afc-a-license-coach-from-the-district-ganderbal-jammu-kashmir Guy from Kashmir (talk) 04:13, 22 September 2026 (UTC).reply

Here is analysis of the sources:

  • 1. Rising Kashmir is Credible daily English newspaper printed and published online.
You can check their website: https://risingkashmir.com/
I checked the Author is genuine and there are thousands of news articles covered by him.
  • 2. Khel now India's leading digital sports news platform covering football, kabaddi, cricket, hockey.

Their website https://khelnow.com . Author has hundreds of sports related articles on his name.

3. Kashmir Images is also a daily newspaper publishing agency. Website: https://thekashmirimages.com/

I don't think there is any chances of these sources being unreliable. Guy from Kashmir (talk)

  • Keep — I don't see any obvious issue with the sourcing. References 10, 12 and 13 in the article are good enough to warrant standalone notability to the subject. The sources appear to be RS and one or two quotes from the subject doesn't make those interview pieces. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 03:48, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Keep: The tone of the article is not promotional so the article does not violate WP:PROMO. The sources seem reliable and notable on their own, some of the sources are debatable but most are enough to establish notability. The user above also has a valid point, I'd oppose deletion on these grounds. Farhanansari1994 (talk) 21:28, 25 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:36, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Keep - sourcing seems solid, and I agree with Bhikhari that 10, 12, and 13, in particular, are good and helpful. Notability is shown. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 22:31, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Sunil Kumar (athlete) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. No significant coverage from multiple reliable sources. Thilsebatti (talk) 17:37, 21 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 18:52, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Mehfuz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable studio album not meeting WP:NALBUM. Found no sources with significant coverage about it that makes it notable. Babin Mew (talk) 04:53, 21 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh (talk 🎮 sign) 21:05, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Redirect to Euphoria (Indian band)#Discography, nothing proving its notability. Cheromaniii (talk) 03:49, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Lycée Français International de Delhi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:33, 21 September 2026 (UTC)reply

@Dz5t 8O12: The standard of SIGCOV depends on how much commentary each source makes about the subject. From WP:SIGCOV: ""Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." So if the source only has a single sentence about the school, that is not SIGCOV. If it has two paragraphs about the school, that is SIGCOV.
So far two of the three sources have SIGCOV. If The Asian Age is an RS, I will make a keep vote.
You can look for coverage in French newspapers and magazines, including those about French expatriates, for additional coverage.
WhisperToMe (talk) 18:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:17, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Thakurayeen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NFILM. Nothing found in a BEFORE to support notability.

PROD removed because there is “Contemporary reviews are scarce for Bhojpuri films of the 1960s–1990s”. That is exactly the reason why it fails WP:NFILM, because that policy states it needs at least 2 critical reviews to be considered notable. That argument could be used as rationale to keep any film. For example, "Film Name should be kept because it is made by a bunch of college kids and released only on VHS, which those types of films rarely gets any critical reviews...therefore we must keep."

The other rationale for removing the PROD was because it "was the only film in which Sujit Kumar was co-directed by a female filmmaker, Meeni Thakur." and it should pass WP:NFIC because of that. But just because an actor was directed by a certain person is not a reason for a Keep. That rationale could be used for any film, "Actor 1 was directed by Director 1 for the only time in their careers, therefore we should keep that article." There needs to be more of a reason for that to make a film notable. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:08, 21 September 2026 (UTC)reply

  • Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:08, 21 September 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Author’s Comments: KEEP. I recommend keeping Thakurayeen because conventional evidence of film notability—especially contemporary mainstream reviews—is unusually scarce for Bhojpuri films of the 1960s–1990s. Film scholar Ratnakar Tripathy writes that such films “are as a matter of rule not reviewed in newspapers or websites except for promotional commentaries and insertions” and notes “a near absence of textual analysis of Bhojpuri cinema either in the press or academic circles” (full citation in the article). This is a documented sourcing gap affecting older Bhojpuri cinema, consistent with the systemic-bias concern described at WP:BIAS: “lack of sources and therefore notability causes articles to go through the deletion process of Wikipedia.” This does not mean that the absence of reviews alone establishes notability, nor that every poorly documented Bhojpuri film should have a stand-alone article. Accordingly, I have used the alternative notability route recognized by WP:NFILM / WP:NFIC, under which a film may be presumed notable if it has significant involvement by a notable person and is a major part of their career. The article provides inline reliable sources establishing the notability of the lead actor Sujit Kumar. Thakurayeen was also the first film to be co-directed by a female director, but I do not contend that alone establishes the film’s notability. Rather, I ask that editors assess the available evidence of the film’s notability in light of: (1) the documented limitations of coverage of Bhojpuri cinema during the last century; (2) the film had a significant involvement by a notable person (Sujit Kumar); and finally (3)Thakurayeen was a major part of Kumar's career because it was the first film in which he was co-directed by a female director.Scholar165 (talk) 19:01, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 01:26, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Delete. The limited coverage of Bhojpuri cinema in the 1980s does not support keeping the article; articles are kept based on the reliable sources that they have, not based on what they don't have. Furthermore, merely asserting that "Thakurayeen was a major part of Kumar's career because it was the first film in which he was co-directed by a female director" is not enough; I would need to see a reliable source that says that this was a major part of his career. As far as I can tell, most of the sources cited in this article do not actually mention the film Thakurayeen. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:49, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Mugaputhagam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is a short film released in 2011 that does not have enough sources with significant coverage to meet WP:NFSOURCES. The reception section does not contain two or more full-length reviews and the film was not widely distributed. Many of the other sources merely mention the film in passing as part of the director's debut work. The only potentially usable source I could identify is this Indian Express article, which provides brief coverage of the film and could potentially be considered a capsule review. The other reviews are by non-notable individuals and were published on blogs, making them unsuitable for establishing notability. This should either be redirected to Atlee_(director)#Career as an WP:ATD-R or deleted. Fails WP:NFLIM Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:30, 20 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Firstpost is reliable for uncontroversial content as per the WP:ICTF listing so would be acceptable in this case, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:13, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 17:05, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Michael Madhusudan Dutta College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:21, 20 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 16:34, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply


WMO Arts & Science College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:19, 20 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 16:34, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Shradha Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All the references are on her company Yourstory, and nothing has changed since previous afd. If anyone can find 3 in-depth SIRS then I wolud happy to withdraw this nomination. Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 19:32, 19 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Keep. Disclosure first: I have a professional connection with YourStory and work with Shradha Sharma on commissioned projects, so please weigh my comments accordingly.
The nominator has kindly asked for three in-depth SIRS, so I have tried to answer that directly and have left out anything published by YourStory, interviews, and routine announcements.
Forbes India, "2018 W-Power Trailblazers: Meet Shradha Sharma, the chronicler of young startups" (8 March 2018) . A bylined editorial feature about Sharma herself, covering her upbringing in Patna, her education at St Stephen's College, her journalism career at CNBC TV18, and how she founded and self funded YourStory before it raised outside capital. The Hindu, "High above the glass ceiling" [URL]. A feature profile of Sharma covering her background in Bihar and her career in media before founding YourStory. The Tribune, "Internet schools YourStory founder Shradha Sharma after viral 'sit properly' rant at Delhi's Taj Mahal hotel" (October 2025) , with separate IANS coverage in which she was interviewed about the incident. This is independent national coverage centred on Sharma rather than her company, and it postdates the earlier discussions.
Taken together, these show independent coverage of Shradha Sharma as a subject in her own right across several years, which I believe meets WP:BASIC. I'm happy to help trim promotional material from the article if editors feel it needs tightening. ~~~~ CovidBubble (talk) 18:17, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply
The forbes article is I can condiser as SIRS, I am not able to see any links of CNBC TV18, I am not able to verify journalists name of The Tribune so this is not a SIRS. Add 2 more sirs, if I feel those 2 are sirs then I am willing to withdraw the Afd. Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 20:53, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Thank you, {{u|Nomadwikiholic1}}, for reviewing these carefully. On CNBC TV18, the ''Forbes India'' piece you accepted [https://www.forbesindia.com/article/2018-wpower-trailblazers/2018-wpower-trailblazers-meet-shradha-sharma-the-chronicler-of-young-startups/49623/1] covers her career there, so I'll leave that point.
The further sources I'd put forward as SIRS are:
The following may also be considered as SIRS individually as together they show that independent outlets in English and Hindi have covered Shradha Sharma as a person across a decade:
If you feel this still falls short, I'd respectfully suggest draftification rather than deletion, so the article can be strengthened and resubmitted through AfC as further coverage appears. ~~~~ CovidBubble (talk) 03:08, 25 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 09:21, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Parle Tilak Vidyalaya Marathi Medium Secondary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:11, 19 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:03, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Puducherry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:56, 18 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:56, 4 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Rong Berong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Several sources do not mention this TV series (, , ) or mention it only in passing (, , , although they call it Shwet Kapot, assuming that is the same series). There's also a Bengali file hosted on self-hosting service Onedrive of uncertain provenance. Between this and a BEFORE search that came up empty, I can't find much evidence of a show by this name and certainly nothing that passes the test of WP:GNG. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:53, 16 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 15:07, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh (talk 🎮 sign) 18:27, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Divakar Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. The subject's notability under Wikipedia's general notability guideline is not established. LegacyWiki (talk) 09:11, 16 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 14:57, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Agree with Bearian that a better WP:BEFORE should have been performed, especially given the fact that he's sourced to the Library of Congress. I'd thus opt for a procedural Keep.
CSGinger14 (talk) 09:06, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:09, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Harisatya Bhattacharya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Author of a few books about Jainism. I could not find any secondary coverage whatsoever about their books or scholarship and I don't see any indication that they pass WP:NAUTHOR or WP:NPROF. If more relevant sources are found, please ping me. Mariamnei ✦ reach out 🕊️ 06:39, 16 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 13:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh (talk 🎮 sign) 17:58, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Diu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:03, 14 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 17:13, 21 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Robloxguest3 (talk) 17:43, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Redirect to List of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas#Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu where this is mentioned as a WP:ATD. Servite et contribuere (talk) 18:08, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Meghna Agarwal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the requirements of WP:GNG The coverages are mostly routine including interviews, press releases, sponsored contents. There is no significant in-depth coverage required meeting notability standards. Thilsebatti (talk) 01:42, 13 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 18:15, 20 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 00:44, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply


2026 Sangareddy Municipal Council election (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to 2026 Telangana local elections because, not enough WP:SIGCOV specific to this council, other than the general Telangana elections coverage.. No need for a separate standalone article. Vestrian24Bio 13:52, 12 September 2026 (UTC)reply

There are many UK councils with far fewer voters and minimal media coverage, the sources being mostly government websites. Yet
they still have their own election pages.
2024 Runnymede Borough Council election
2023 Runnymede Borough Council election
2023 Ribble Valley Borough Council election
2023 Rutland County Council election
2023 Oadby and Wigston Borough Council election
In fact these go even further in detail by showing the number of votes for all the candidates in each ward, not just the top 2. They have similar or fewer voters in each ward.
These towns are also far less prominent in England than Sangareddy is in Telangana. It is a district capital. Ok123l (talk) 16:24, 13 September 2026 (UTC)reply
@Ok123l: see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Vestrian24Bio 16:31, 13 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Per WP:OTHERSTUFFGENERAL, comparing articles of the exact same nature is valid when establishing global consistency. I quote:

"In consideration of precedent and consistency, though, identifying articles of the same nature that have been established and continue to exist on Wikipedia may provide extremely important insight into the general concept of notability, levels of notability (what's notable: international, national, regional, state, provincial?), and whether or not a level and type of article should be on Wikipedia."

Ok123l (talk) 16:37, 13 September 2026 (UTC)reply
@Ok123l: Notability is not decided based on the number of voters or a place's significance. Instead it's decided based on the amount of in-depth coverage on independent reliable sources. The elections that you yourself listed above all have such coverage from media such as BBC. But, for Sangareddy, all of the sources are general sources about the Telangana elections and not specific to Sangareddy elections. Thus, it fails Wikipedia's inclusion criteria to have a standalone article. Vestrian24Bio 13:39, 15 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 05:10, 20 September 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Merge per nom. On other examples shown above, it is my opinion that these would not meet WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE, WP:LASTING, WP:SUSTAINED to constitute their own stand-alone articles either (on OTHERSTUFFGENERAL, that would more likely be a case of "Therefore, just pointing out that an article on a similar subject exists does not prove that the article in question should also exist; it is quite possible that the other article should also be deleted but nobody has noticed it", but that is a larger problem of UK local election coverage in the en.wiki (as these articles seem to be created almost automatically by users without actual considerations on SIGCOV) that cannot be properly addressed individually. Impru20talk 11:57, 20 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 16:41, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Karam Lehal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have agreed a fresh AFD for this page as the previous consensus was quite weak and with the indeffing of one of the participants I don't think it's sustainable. This has been rejected at AFC so a careful look at the sources will be significant to the final consensus. The author has noted on my talkpage that they are not arguing NPORTS is met so GNG is all that is in play. Spartaz Humbug! 13:40, 12 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Keep - tight but enough to show GNG through The Hindu, Business Standard, etc. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 18:02, 12 September 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Delete Non-notable. No sports SNGs are met as suggested by the first keep vote (although I am happy to be pointed towards a specific SNG that I might somehow have missed). Both other keep votes suggest WP:GNG is met, but all the sourcing I see is incredibly routine sports coverage. I would kindly ask that the two keep voters, @Oaktree b and @Jishara demonstrate which two or three sources that show notability via WP:GNG, because I'm not even seeing one. Lots of reliable articles covering results, but all of them stop short of actually showing WP:SIGCOV of the subject other than in relation to said results. There's also lots of articles that demonstrate WP:SIGCOV, but aren't reliable and/or independent Sulfurboy (talk) 06:33, 13 September 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Keep: Independent sources cover his national and international-level achievements and career, supporting GNG. Lakshays143 (talk) 15:24, 17 September 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Keep - DNA INDIA, THE TRIBUNE, TRUE SCOOP, JAGBANI are WP:SIGCOV In independent and reliable sources, making him clearly qualified for WP:GNG. LegacyWiki (talk) 10:07, 18 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Keep as per other users' comments here. I agree with all of you. SH360! (Must edit! Must report!) 12:05, 20 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The source analysis from the "keep" !voters is rather thin. While we have two experienced participants on that side, we also have three AfD newbies casting fairly thin !votes and I'd like to see some additional source assessment.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:20, 20 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Keep - to me there are people with less notoriety who remain on wiki and so I think WP:GNG is met Colepetbun (talk) 05:39, 21 September 2026 (UTC) — Blocked sockpuppet Blocked sockpuppet of Dingdongd1887, see investigation. reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: "Makes BIO" is not quite the source assessment I was hoping for, and the fact that a sockpuppet showed up here to !vote "keep" is another reason to request insight from our experienced participants.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:10, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply


British Meitei (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources consist almost entirely of routine local event notices, primary press releases, and directory listings (primarily from regional portals like e-pao.net). Nothing to suggest WP:GNG also I see a lot of WP:SYNTH issues here. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 02:56, 8 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh (talk 🎮 sign) 20:26, 15 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Speedy delete on the grounds it is promotional material and not significant in anyway. There aren't even 700 Metei in all of the UK. AadamentAardvark (talk) 01:57, 19 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:41, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Selective merge Ok I get what ultimately happened here but I'd respectfully ask @Flyingphoenixchips that they not slate articles for deletion in the future. If they're not fundamentally dissimilar in nature, you can ultimately use the precedent of one for the others, and probably get more support for it than you might have otherwise. If not you end up getting the result seen with the Nagaland discussion below, which is abuse of ONUS.
CSGinger14 (talk) 06:44, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Or, alternatively, you combine the nominations. Dispersing them in this manner, whether intentional or not, is abusive of that expectation.
CSGinger14 (talk) 07:09, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:49, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Selective merge - I agree with owen and CS, the content would be a valid inclusion into the main article. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 14:27, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply


92.7 Big FM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. scope_creepTalk 09:05, 6 September 2026 (UTC)reply

This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least three deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject Takeover news is routine business news and doesn't pass WP:CORPTRIV. Announcements of company sales and insolvencies are considered routine news that fail both WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:CORPTRIV and WP:SIRS. Competing bids don't show notability per WP:ORGIND, WP:SIRS. scope_creepTalk 06:46, 8 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 14:54, 13 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 15:51, 20 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 17:10, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Keep 92.7 BIG FM is a well-known radio station in India. I have added several references to the article and will try to add more. The available references provide significant coverage of the subject and support its notability under WP:GNG.

Ref1: https://www.livehindustan.com/business/sapphire-media-new-owner-of-sapphire-media-nclt-give-approval-201715058413979.html Ref2: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-south-asia-13374457 Ref3: https://m.economictimes.com/industry/media/entertainment/media/nclt-approves-sapphire-medias-acquisition-of-big-92-7-fm/amp_articleshow/109909637.cms Ref4: https://assamtimes.org/article/big-92-7-brings-spirit-of-oympics-2008-to-guwahati-1815 Guy from Kashmir (talk)

The first one is a press-release driven article and is likely non-rs. The second is unbylined as likely non-rs. Still a fail of WP:NCORP as I've still not seen a single reference that passes WP:SIRS. scope_creepTalk 08:06, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply
@Scope creep
What about this ref1: https://www.livehindustan.com/business/sapphire-media-new-owner-of-sapphire-media-nclt-give-approval-201715058413979.html

Ref2: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-south-asia-13374457 (talk) 08:31, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Proposed deletions

[edit]

Files for deletion

[edit]

Category discussion debates

[edit]

Template discussion debates

[edit]

Redirects for deletion

[edit]

MFD discussion debates

[edit]

Other deletion discussions

[edit]