Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/India

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion and merging of articles related to India. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|India|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to India. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Asia.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

• WikiProject Deletion sorting/India/archive
• WikiProject Deletion sorting/India/archive 2
• WikiProject Deletion sorting/India/archive 3
• WikiProject Deletion sorting/India/archive 4
• WikiProject Deletion sorting/India/archive 5

watch

• Should you have India related questions, ask at, Notice board for India-related topics.

• See also: Points to remember when debating in India related deletion discussions.
• Note: AnomieBOT removes and archives closed debates from this page a few times a day, so there is no need to manually remove such pages.
• Deletion sorting by state or union territory:
  • Andhra Pradesh
  • Arunachal Pradesh
  • Assam
  • Bihar
  • Chhattisgarh
  • Delhi
  • Goa
  • Gujarat
  • Haryana
  • Himachal Pradesh
  • Jammu and Kashmir
  • Jharkhand
  • Karnataka
  • Kerala
  • Ladakh
  • Madhya Pradesh
  • Maharashtra
  • Manipur
  • Meghalaya
  • Mizoram
  • Nagaland
  • Odisha
  • Punjab
  • Rajasthan
  • Sikkim
  • Tamil Nadu
  • Telangana
  • Tripura
  • Uttarakhand
  • Uttar Pradesh
  • West Bengal

India

Gowrishankar srg

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Gowrishankar srg
• Articles for deletion/Gowrishankar srg (2nd nomination)

Gowrishankar srg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A quick check of the history of this hijacked articles shows plenty of sockpuppetry, which seems to be because that's the only way of getting this person an article. He does not seems to meet WP:FILMMAKER or WP:GNG. Seems like notability is marginal at the moment. A lot of the references are brief and/or unauthored and/or WP:NEWSORGINDIA concerns. The last AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gowrishankar SRG (3rd nomination) ended as draftification. But I think at this point the title should be admin protected from recreation.Thilsebatti (talk) 02:23, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

The last AFD had Mushy Yank doing back and fourth on his TA after the EVA UX block. Assumed bad faith without knowing the context behind it. BengalMC (talk) 03:53, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. Thilsebatti (talk) 02:23, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete and SALT Per norm above — Preceding unsigned comment added by BengalMC (talk • contribs) 03:47, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete and SALT: Concur with nom en toto. This page is here, again, for reasons that defy any kind of encyclopedic value. It seems that the only way we avoid having to do this again in a little while is to salt the page. This person fails notability guidelines as mentioned above, and since consensus was already to delete, I'd say this is a case for WP:SNOW. Foxtrot620 (talk) 05:02, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete+Salt Per nomination. An editor from Mars (talk) 05:36, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep – I do not understand the nomination's conclusion that the subject fails WP:GNG. The article is supported by multiple independent reliable sources and the subject is primarily an actor, so filmmaker-specific guidance is not the central consideration. He has also received the Filmfare Critics Award for Best Actor – Kannada at the 70th Filmfare Awards South which is a significant career achievement. Based on the available sourcing, the subject appears to satisfy WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Any remaining issues with sourcing or tone can be addressed through normal editing rather than deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raunka sonkar (talk • contribs) 07:44, 5 August 2026 (UTC) — Raunka sonkar (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Delete and SALT - It's worth noting that this article is almost identical to Draft:Gowri Shankar SRG, which was entirely written by a now-banned UPE editor and was maintained by a bunch of Alakmarsaify socks. That, alone, is reason enough to delete any mainspace copies of this. The UPE and COI alone should mean that this person should only have an article if it has passed WP:AfC review. Per WP:PAY, you should put new articles through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process instead of creating them directly. This is the 5th AfD on this person in a very short space of time. Yes, there is some minor press coverage of an upcoming film that he is involved with but I am not convinced that that is enough to bypass clear prior consensus and let's call a spade a spade. It's clear from the history of the correct title Gowrishankar SRG that there is a non-organic push to get this person an article at any cost. Unless the COI or paid editing is disclosed as per our WP:COI policy, we should not be entertaining this. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:12, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

  As I've added SPA tags now, I'm disqualified from being able to !vote. Surely if this has been remade so many times without any real changes, this qualifies WP:G4? Obviously SALTing can be done on top. 11WB 💬 12:27, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

  The last deletion was at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gowrishankar SRG (2nd nomination), however, a new SPA has just added new sources to this article and changed some of the text, so I don't think it's a carbon copy of the previous article any more. In my experience, G4 is very strict and the addition of any new sources or prose immediately disqualifies it. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gowrishankar SRG (3rd nomination), was effectively a delete close but it could be technically argued as a draftify close, so may not be eligible either. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:33, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Fully Support Keep – I don't understand how the nominator concluded that the subject fails notability Huh? WP:BEFORE. Secondly most of the delete !votes appear to be from editors who are not familiar with Kannada-language sources. My reasons for keeping the article are: The subject clearly passes WP:GNG. The subject has received Filmfare recognition, which, in my view, supports notability under WP:ANYBIO and WP:NACTOR. The claim that the references are weak is not correct. There are many independent, journalist-written and authored reliable sources available, most of them in Kannada. The subject is not WP:TOOSOON. He has worked on four films, with three released and one upcoming. Even if there were concerns about earlier paid editing, that does not by itself determine whether the subject is notable. Notability depends on the availability of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Based on my reading of WP:ANYBIO, WP:NACTOR, and WP:GNG, I believe the subject may satisfy Wikipedia's notability requirements. If not, could you please identify the specific deficiencies that still need to be addressed? The article is supported by multiple independent reliable sources, including official recognition from Filmfare, coverage of the film's screening at the International Film Festival of India, and reporting from several independent publications:

• Official Filmfare recognition: Filmfare
• Cinema Express: Kerebete screened at 55th IFFI
• OTTplay: 1
• Movie Talkies: 2
• Vijayavani: 3
• Udayavani: 4
• TV9 Kannada: 5 well gowri also passes WP:THREE If these sources are still considered insufficient, I would appreciate guidance on what additional independent coverage would be required.Kannada Kumari (talk) 11:55, 5 August 2026 (UTC) — Kannada Kumari (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

All these sources are mostly about the movies rather than the subject himself. It also contains many interviews which is considered primary sources. Thilsebatti (talk) 12:10, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Please read this guidance WP:ANYBIO also See WP:HEY Kannada Kumari (talk) 12:14, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Use trans and read ref Kannada Kumari (talk) 12:17, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

If biographical coverage is limited, the article can remain as a stub with appropriate maintenance tags. That alone is not a reason for deletion if notability has been established. Kannada Kumari (talk) 12:15, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: I have marked some accounts as WP:SPAs, as an uninvolved party, due to evidence of WP:UPE and potential sockpuppetry involving the article. 11WB 💬 12:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Sujata Madhok

Sujata Madhok (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not see a pass of WP:NBIO, WP:BASIC or WP:NAUTHOR. The available sourcing I could find on Google as well as listed in the article is mainly bylines, routine DUJ office-holder/election mentions, report credits, and quotes in articles about other topics, rather than significant independent coverage of Madhok herself. The article also has long-standing BLP sourcing problems. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:14, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Journalism, and India. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:14, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Jai Surya High School

Jai Surya High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 23:38, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Haryana. Shellwood (talk) 23:40, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Hardayal Public School

Hardayal Public School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 23:37, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Haryana. Shellwood (talk) 23:40, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Nadia nun rape case

Nadia nun rape case (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Violence against Christians in India because there is no persisting WP:SIGCOV. There was no backlash like protests, a law passing or something similar. So, there is no evidence that this passes WP:LASTING either. The coverage is not WP:DIVERSE, except for the BBC, which regularly covers Indian events.

Now, the target page is not completely suitable for such an event, which did not garner lasting coverage. However, a page like List of attacks against Christians in India could be created due to the large number of attacks and coverage by outside sources. However, until that is created, the information in this page should be harbored there. If that does not convince people, then I choose draftification as my second choice. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 11:56, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Events, Islam, Bangladesh, and India. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 11:56, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and West Bengal. Shellwood (talk) 12:13, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

J K Tyre

J K Tyre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Typical corporate spam for an Indian tire manufacturer, declined as a speedy. The references here are the expected slew of PR junk, no evidence of notability. Could potentially be redirected to its parent company J. K. Organisation but I'm not certain that would survive its own AfD. MediaKyle (talk) 10:38, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Transportation, and India. MediaKyle (talk) 10:38, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:01, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

All India Youth Federation

All India Youth Federation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A majority of the references are primary sources (not independent) and the few secondary sources do not seem to cite the information present in this page. Not to mention that this article has remained poorly sourced for almost a decade. _signed, Kvinnen (talk) 10:06, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and India. _signed, Kvinnen (talk) 10:06, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Per WP:ORG organisations are not inherently notable, and, as Kvinnen has pointed out, there is no significant coherence in secondary sources. Katiedevi (talk) 13:09, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:31, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
• AIYF is the oldest youth organization in India.

Same language subtitling

Same language subtitling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Subtitles, specifically into the "§ Same-language subtitling" section of that article, because there is not nearly enough on this topic for a substantive, stand-alone article (not to mention that Subtitles already has lots of information on SLS that this article is missing).

It would serve our readers better to just merge the India info + a few extra things from this article into Subtitles, rather than have the tiniest bits of extra info behind an extra click. Hugo P. Behrmann (☎) 05:47, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Television, Disability, and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:07, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
• Merge per huge WP:OVERLAP. FaviFake (talk) 16:32, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
• Merge. Doubt that there's substantive coverage of this topic on its own, and the merge target is very clear. M kuhner (talk) 21:29, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Anti Paper Leak Bill 2026

Anti Paper Leak Bill 2026 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposing merger with Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024. This article is about the recent amendment to the existing Act (the target article Act). The only amendments made were increasing fines and jail term period, the article basically covers about this amendment. There is no need for standalone article because this is not separate Act. The Anti Paper Leak Bill name also actually a media shorthand, it not official title, nowhere its Anti Paper Leak Bill, 2026. An amendment section is appropriate than this. Wikipicked (talk) 07:59, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Law and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:03, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
• Merge per nominator's rationale, just an amendment. FaviFake (talk) 16:30, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Synergy Institute of Engineering & Technology

Synergy Institute of Engineering & Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:43, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, India, and Odisha. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 04:22, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as it fails notability and WP:NSCHOOL.Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 07:01, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Engineering, and Technology. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:11, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Borai High School

Borai High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:46, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete for the reason stated: WP:GNG. Also, there is a promotional tone. Entychologist (talk) 01:59, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, India, and West Bengal. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 04:19, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 07:00, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:11, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Rahul Bhatia (businessman)

Rahul Bhatia (businessman) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References 2,3,4 are showing errors or something unrelated (at the time of nomination since the creator now made some changes). Does not meet the requirements of WP:GNG . There are no useful sources. The coverages are mostly routine including interviews, press releases, sponsored contents. There is no significant in-depth coverage required meeting notability standards. Thilsebatti (talk) 04:11, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India. Thilsebatti (talk) 04:11, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Uttarakhand-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:07, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Pranveer Singh Institute of Technology (PSIT), Kanpur

Pranveer Singh Institute of Technology (PSIT), Kanpur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article about a private college. Fails NORG and GNG. Sources are routine. Thilsebatti (talk) 04:01, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, and India. Thilsebatti (talk) 04:01, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete the sources are infact not reliable at all. Fails WP: WP:NSCHOOL. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 06:59, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Engineering, Technology, and Uttar Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:08, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

History of Joy

History of Joy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM. No reviews found in a BEFORE. Other language article has no usable citations either. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:59, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Film-related AfD discussions. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:59, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete: Per nom, concurrence in toto, additionally, all the available low quality sources are within two weeks of eachother, which means not only does it lack appropriate coverage, it also lacks non-routine, and any kind of continued coverage. Beyond that it has serious notability issues, and appears to be simply a run of the mill film without any kind of significance. Foxtrot620 (talk) 13:16, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: I found this review from Onmanorama. I'm not sure if it's usable, as many of the pages that would allow me to find this come up as "access denied". Still, if it is usable it's a step in the right direction. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:30, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

  I also found these articles from the Deccan Chronicle. I'm kind of getting the impression that there might be more coverage out there (ie, reviews from RS), but it's probably not in English. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:38, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Padmaja Venugopal

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Padmaja Venugopal
• Articles for deletion/Padmaja Venugopal (2nd nomination)

Padmaja Venugopal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non elected politician. Fails NPOL and GNG. Thilsebatti (talk) 15:36, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, India, and Kerala. Thilsebatti (talk) 15:36, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep several sources in the article provide GNG with sigcov. Additional sources such as this one also help ~2026-33562-67 (talk) 17:30, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep - NPOL is out of the question, of course, but GNG is met: I see sigcov from The Hindu, Hindustan Times, New Indian Express, ThePrint, etc. Jishara (talk) 22:12, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: I suspect this is the same subject as the first nomination from 2024 that ended in deletion, though that does not necessarily mean the issues from that iteration that led to that result are as applicable to the current version (I have no opinion on that front). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:37, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep per above, article lists several secondary sources Junosang^{leave a message} 17:09, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 11:49, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete WP:NPOL doesn't apply since she's never held elected office, so notability rests entirely on WP:GNG, which isn't met. All the coverage is the routine stuff every party candidate gets, election announcements, result reports and some interview quotes. None of it is independent nor there is any in-depth writing about her specifically. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:07, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Women, India, and Kerala. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:15, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

2013 bombing of Indian consulate in Jalalabad

2013 bombing of Indian consulate in Jalalabad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to India–Afghanistan relations because this fails WP:NEVENT, by way of WP:LASTING and WP:CASESTUDY. The coverage on Google News is only contemporary, as opposed to continued coverage a couple years after the event. There are no results on Google Scholar, showing a lack of academic interest in the event. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 08:46, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Terrorism, Islam, Afghanistan, and India. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 08:46, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Merge per nominator's rationale. Is there a specific reason why you didn't just boldly perform the merge yourself? This proposal seems uncontroversial and it's just 1 paragraph. FaviFake (talk) 09:00, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  Sometimes I nominated articles which I thought were uncontroversial, but they ended up being kept. I am also new, so I want to give myself more examples of articles being kept/merged/deleted for different reasons before I start doing them without nominations, so I do not create unnecessary trouble. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 09:19, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  Makes sense! In general you can always try to merge the article first and then see if someone reverts it, unless the page is popular or very long. If they do revert you, you can open an AfD discussion :)   ​

  In this case the page is extremely small so i doubt anyone would ever oppose it. FaviFake (talk) 09:23, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Merge to India–Afghanistan relations as a separate section. Ratnahastin (talk) 02:36, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Amit Kataria

Amit Kataria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

For lack of significant coverage. I don't see anything reliable. Last of The Time (talk) 05:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: India, Delhi, and Haryana. Last of The Time (talk) 05:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: @User:Last of The Time do you check the references that are provide in the article and you searched about Amit Kataria at google and In my knowledge the article meet to WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG or the article have significant coverage from the highly reputed and recognized media houses and newspapers, like The Times of India, Deccan Herald, Business Standard, ABP News and Dainik Jagran and Dainik Bhaskar and other media houses.etc and I thought the nominator is wrong starts WP:AFD.Cptabhiimanyuseven •[@píng mє] 10:21, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: A quick WP:BEFORE leads to many reliable sources around the individual. The Hindu , The Economic Times and Al Jazeera , the article already cites several other good sources, an article is pretty much warranted for an administrator who was previously rebuked for informally receiving Prime Minister of India and now holds secretary office in the Ministry of Rural Development (India). The AfD should be deemed to be premature as little to no rationale has been presented. Naslmah (talk) 09:14, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep per Deccan Herald, Business Standard, Hindustan Times sources on him. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 12:55, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Rosary High School (Vadodara)

Rosary High School (Vadodara) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

relies on primary source. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Coderzombie (talk) 10:32, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related AfD discussions. Coderzombie (talk) 10:32, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, India, and Gujarat. Shellwood (talk) 10:36, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:39, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Additional searches yielded nothing useful with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 14:30, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Podar World School

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Podar World School
• Articles for deletion/Podar World School (2nd nomination)

Podar World School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

relies on primary source. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Coderzombie (talk) 10:31, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related AfD discussions. Coderzombie (talk) 10:31, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education and India. Shellwood (talk) 10:33, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Additional searches yielded a number of non-independent ROUTINE school events' coverages in a local news outlet....which don't qualify as SIGCOV. So.....nothing there to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 14:27, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: this survived the first nomination in 2016, but only because it ended as "no consensus" after attracting very few comments (and came on the heels of a G11 speedy deletion a month earlier). No opinion on if this meets 2026 standards, which are stricter than 2016's in this topic area. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:39, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

  I think it might have survived 2016 nomination too based on guidelines then. But it certainly doesn't meet the criteria now. Coderzombie (talk) 13:13, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Baroda High School

Baroda High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

relies on primary source. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Coderzombie (talk) 10:30, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related AfD discussions. Coderzombie (talk) 10:30, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, India, and Gujarat. Shellwood (talk) 10:32, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Additional searches yielded two sorts of coverages - TRIVIAL mentions in hoax bomb threat articles and ROUTINE school events reportages......none of them carry the SIGCOV required to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:29, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Baroda High School, Bagikhana

Baroda High School, Bagikhana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

relies on primary source. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Coderzombie (talk) 10:30, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related AfD discussions. Coderzombie (talk) 10:30, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, India, and Gujarat. Shellwood (talk) 10:32, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Additional searches yielded a number of TRIVIAL mentions in hoax bomb threat articles and some directories....but nothing with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 14:21, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Dr Vidyadhara S

Dr Vidyadhara S (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:PROMO and does not meet the requirements of WP:GNG The coverages are mostly routine including interviews, press releases, sponsored contents. There is no significant in-depth coverage required meeting notability. standards. Thilsebatti (talk) 01:25, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Medicine, and India. Thilsebatti (talk) 01:25, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:00, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Amber-Rose Badrudin

Amber-Rose Badrudin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to The Apprentice (British TV series) because coverage is not WP:SUSTAINED and is due to her appearance in The Apprentice. Fails WP:GNG. BookishReader (talk) 23:16, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of England-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:29, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:29, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:29, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Television-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:30, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Women-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:30, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:30, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:30, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:38, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect as suggested, and as reasonable in these circumstances. I'm laughing at the use of the word "penultimate" in this situation. She lost. Bearian (talk) 13:40, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

St. Francis Anglo-Indian Girls School

St. Francis Anglo-Indian Girls School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE yielded some non-independent ROUTINE coverages and directories, but no SIGCOV in RS to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:34, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, Christianity, India, and Tamil Nadu. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:34, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Listed sources are all directories, proof of existence but not notability. I also couldn't find any sources that qualify to support notability, though there is a passing mention of this school in a novel. Not relevant, but interesting. Sesamehoneytart 23:37, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Carmel Garden Matriculation Higher Secondary School

Carmel Garden Matriculation Higher Secondary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE yielded some non-independent ROUTINE coverages in a local newspaper and some directories, but no SIGCOV in RS to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:31, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Tamil Nadu. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:31, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:58, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Suguna PIP School

Suguna PIP School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE yielded a number of ROUTINE reportages about board exam results and some directories, but no RS with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:28, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Tamil Nadu. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:28, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Dhubri Girls' College

Dhubri Girls' College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:39, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Assam. Shellwood (talk) 22:42, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Dhubri#Colleges, where it's listed, as an ATD-R. Additional searches yielded some ROUTINE and TRIVIAL reportage but nothing with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:29, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep It's an established college which has WP:SIGCOV it passes WP:GNG. Staticspector (talk) 13:45, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Rupayatan

Rupayatan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:38, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Gujarat. Shellwood (talk) 22:41, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: Didn't find anything with SIGCOV in additional searches to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:26, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as there are no reliable sources for this article. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 17:53, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Article doesn't have WP:SIGCOV to pass WP:NSCHOOL. Staticspector (talk) 22:47, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Government Polytechnic, Hisar

Government Polytechnic, Hisar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:38, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Haryana. Shellwood (talk) 22:40, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: Just another ROTM institute. Didn't find anything with SIGCOV in additional searches to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:24, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom suggested by User:Filmssssssssssss. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 17:56, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Government College for Girls, Hisar

Government College for Girls, Hisar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:38, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Haryana. Shellwood (talk) 22:40, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: Additional searches yielded some ROUTINE and TRIVIAL reportage but nothing with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:24, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: Fails WP:SIGCOV. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 17:55, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Doesn't make NSCHOOL. Khalitate (talk) 06:00, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Agree with nominator page lacks any notability to pass WP:NSCHOOL. Staticspector (talk) 22:53, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Smt K A Vora Primary School

Smt K A Vora Primary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:38, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Gujarat. Shellwood (talk) 22:40, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Ranasan Town#Schools, where it's listed, as an ATD-R. Just another ROTM institute. Didn't find anything with SIGCOV in additional searches to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:21, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as there is no independent reliable coverage about it being one of the oldest public schools in India. Also fails WP:NSCHOOL. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 17:57, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to Ranasan Town#Schools. Doesn't make NSCHOOL. Khalitate (talk) 06:01, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect To Ranasan Town#Schools it just another WP:RUNOFTHEMILL school which doesn't pass WP:NSCHOOL. Staticspector (talk) 23:02, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

New Government Polytechnic, Patna-13

New Government Polytechnic, Patna-13 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pure promo page on a polytechnic in India. Of the four sources: 1 is missing; 2 does not appear to be relevant; 3 is a dead link and 4 is irrelevant. Page was draftified on July 26, moved back to main without change on July 30. Any of delete, redraftify or WP:HEY rewrite (if notability can be shown) are OK, the current version is an inappropriately written advert. Ldm1954 (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, India, and Bihar. Ldm1954 (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

It is public institute and recognised by peoples interest of notice in public domain. Amarjeetkr97 (talk) 19:08, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Just another ROTM institute. Didn't find anything with SIGCOV in additional searches to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:20, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Education-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:59, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Kasmira kingdom

Kasmira kingdom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose draftifying because this article has been completely unsourced for years. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:11, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of History-related AfD discussions. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:11, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:25, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:27, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Why is this one an exception to the rule of thumb that articles more than 90 days old should not be draftified? It's legal at AfD, certainly, but will it accomplish anything beyond what deletion would? M kuhner (talk) 14:11, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@M kuhner - Articles more than 90 days old cannot be moved to draft "without consensus". That is why I opened this AfD. If an AfD determines that an article should be moved to draft, it can be moved to draft even if it is older than 90 days. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 13:01, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Oppose - article technically cites the Mahabharata parenthetically, though we'd now want a non-brackets cite style, and secondary sources. The {{multiple issues}} tag was only just added this month, so maybe that's why article's issues have been unaddressed for years? Would imagine draftifying would make it less likely that flagged issues are addressed (no?), so oppose rn, and would oppose deleting as topic seems notable. - Asdfjrjjj (talk) 19:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Unless the article can be improved with scholarly sources, there is no reason to retain it anymore. Raymond3023 (talk) 02:56, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose and Keep along the same lines as Asdfjrjjj about Mahabharata references and the notability of the topic, but also from my own reading of Kashmir-related history scholarly sources — just off the top of my head — the scholarship of Michael Witzel, Ronald Inden, Shonaleeka Kaul etc. is relevant here and can be cited, but probably even more sources exist. I will add some to this article. UnpetitproleX (talk) 17:53, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

New welfarism

New welfarism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The concept and term is verifiable and has received some coverage but the available sources do not establish notability per WP:GNG. The content may better be incorporated into a broader article on India's welfare policy or the economic policy of the Narendra Modi government according to me. Wikipicked (talk) 09:17, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:10, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related AfD discussions. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 10:33, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

GITEX AI India

GITEX AI India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is about a future event. Fails WP:GNG or WP:NEVENT. Most of the sources are announcements based on information provided by organizers. The page is premature too, a lot of elaboration on planned activities and expected features are mentioned. Wikipicked (talk) 09:26, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Suspected AI-generated articles-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Events-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Artificial intelligence-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:07, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:08, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. WP:TOOSOON fails WP:NEVENT. Accesscrawl (talk) 20:38, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per the nom and for failing NOLLM. Sentences like international coverage of India's AI sector highlighted government-backed initiatives, infrastructure investments and industry partnerships aimed at increasing the country's role in the global artificial intelligence ecosystem are WP:AIATTR, WP:SUPERFICIAL analysis, groups of three, and WP:AILEGACY all rolled up into one. Didn't check for source integrity, because I was already sure enough that this is generated. ‑‑gurkubondinn 22:10, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Government General Degree College, Kaliganj

Government General Degree College, Kaliganj (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Article relies on college website, University of Kalyani (to the univ. which this college is affiliated to) and NAAC records. I attempted to find sources but couldn't find any. Wikipicked (talk) 09:33, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Education-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to University of Kalyani#Affiliated Colleges, where it's listed, as an ATD-R. Additional searches didn't yield anything with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:18, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

  University of Kalyani#Affiliated Colleges, it is there. ~2026-42813-27 (talk) 04:08, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

  Sr. No 46 ~2026-42813-27 (talk) 04:09, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Casablanca Film Factory

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Casablanca Film Factory
• Articles for deletion/Casablanca Film Factory (2nd nomination)

Casablanca Film Factory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has produced many films, but sources are mostly about films. No independent in-depth coverage. Fails WP:NCORP. Thilsebatti (talk) 09:45, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, India, and Kerala. Thilsebatti (talk) 09:45, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Film-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:00, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:00, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: Yes, produced many films, covered by independent reliable sources. Although much of the coverage focuses on the films, those sources consistently identify Casablanca Film Factory as the production company. Several productions have standalone Wikipedia articles, and the article can be further improved through normal editing rather than deletion. Superstars8547 (talk) 11:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  If you think several non notable productions have standalone Wikipedia articles, then you can nominate it for deletion. Having similar article like this is not a reason to argue in an AFD. See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Producing many films does not make this company notable. For that it needs to have independent significant coverage from multiple reliable sources. I can't find any such sources. Thilsebatti (talk) 19:06, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep - I think there are sufficient sources available on Google News. Imperiumscreen (talk) 11:12, 30 July 2026 (UTC) Strike sock !vote --DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:11, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  Can you tell me which are those sources you think. Thilsebatti (talk) 19:07, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: I don't think the sources provide enough coverage of Casablanca Film Factory itself. Most of them focus on the films it produced or distributed, rather than the company, so I don't think the available coverage is enough to establish its notability. Snorlaxion (talk) sock strike. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:30, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: despite the valiant refbombing, the sources cited do not provide sigcov of the company itself, hence no evidence of notability per WP:NCORP. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:37, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Daita Sriramulu Hindu College of Law

Daita Sriramulu Hindu College of Law (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to demonstrate notability under WP:GNG and WP:NORG. This page is supported by admission websites which aren't taken for significant independent coverage. The sources contains routine information about college, like every other college may have. Wikipicked (talk) 08:49, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Andhra Pradesh-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Law-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Education-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Asansol Christian Cemetery

Asansol Christian Cemetery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Other than ETV Bharat talking about this, can't find more. Other references point to christian orgs websites and a report cited mentions that there is a new cemetary opened in Asansol. Not more than that. Wikipicked (talk) 08:54, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:01, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - nothing to indicate GNG or WP:GEOFEAT's heritage criterion. - Embyarby (talk) 18:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Vedic square

Vedic square (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like a WP:FRINGE "Vedic Mathematics"-related thing. I'm not an expert in the history of Indian mathematics but I cannot verify that the term has any adoption in serious mathematical literature, nor that a multiplication table with digital roots was used in Islamic art or Vedic-period Indian mathematics.

Citations do not look reliable to me. I looked around to try to improve them and it seems all information dates back to I found a 1989 journal article by Lesley Jones, which is peer-reviewed but still not trustworthy IMO -- it is in a teaching journal, not a history journal, and claims Indian and Islamic origins but suspiciously does not refer to a single primary source. I found no reliable citations that could salvage this page. 11wx (talk) 07:30, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

EDIT: I found one source older than Jones: Bunyard and Brine, 1988, "Islamic Art: Vedic square" in Micromath journal. I can't access this paper but again, it's in a mathematics education journal, which is not a good citation for statements on math history. Historical origins would be the only thing propping up this article's notability, as the mathematics of it are trivial, and as far as I can tell the Vedic/Islamic connections may have been invented by Bunyard and Brine. 11wx (talk) 17:17, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Mathematics and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:45, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep as Vedic Square is pretty practical and has a number of usage, an article would help someone who is willing to learn it. Farhanansari1994 (talk) 10:12, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Mathematically, this is trivial: just a multiplication table mod 9. But more to the point, we have no sources for this that could pass WP:GNG. The only footnotes are about a minor generalization to higher dimensions, and only one of them appears to be reliably published. The non-footnoted references are general reference books on mathematics (without page numbers and without content relevant to this), an unreliable web page, and a repeat of one of the footnotes. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:04, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete As noted above, it's just a multiplication table mod 9. A few bad-to-mediocre sources use the name "Vedic square"; none of them substantiate the history, which is all that the article could really have going for it in the best case. And if better sources did substantiate this as a motif in ancient art, that still wouldn't be enough to conclude that a whole article about it is the right way to cover the topic encyclopedically. Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 18:45, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Eppstein is correct; the digital root of $n$ in base $b$ is always equal to $1+((n-1){\bmod {(}}b-1))$ if $n\neq 0$. Observations in this article are almost all statements that are explained in Multiplicative group of integers modulo n or at the Cut the Knot EL at Modular arithmetic, since $n=9$ is a case where the generated group is cyclic. For example, every finite group has a Latin square as its Cayley table. No elaboration at all about the supposed significance of the tables in ancient cultures. It is unclear, in particular, if "Vedic" refers to an actual Vedic text about multiplication tables, Vedic Mathematics, or Bunyard and Brine's own invented version of the book's concept. If this concept does notably appear in art, it would be better covered at Multiplication table or Cayley table. Possibly there's a good source with similar information as the Cut the Knot page I mentioned earlier. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:14, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: I'm not convinced by the above "it's trivial" rationales for deletion. I don't believe those hold much, if any, water. The nominator, oddly enough, provided examples of coverage that establishes its notability... yet they nominated this for deletion. This topic has much coverage in academia, such as this from the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (who are without question reliable). I'll have a deeper search before this is due to close in a few days time. For now, I think this is notable and should be kept. 11WB 💬 00:59, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  The only connection between the paper you link and the mod-9 multiplication table appears to be some vague motivational woo involving the Sanskrit derivation of the word "vedic". It is not even using "square" with the same meaning: it is about circuits for squaring numbers, not about square tables of numbers. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:06, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you for fixing the page. It appears you are right, though the sources provided by the nominator still pass the lowest threshold of GNG. This would be acceptable as a redirect back to Vedic mathematics. Striking my earlier !vote. 11WB 💬 22:35, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  The point I was making in the nom is that the best citations I can locate are still of dubious quality -- GNG aside, verifiability is not there. To check that a mathematical concept is 1,000+ years old, I would expect corroborating evidence in multiple resources on the history of mathematics, and references to actual ancienf texts. We don't have that here, we just have a handful of papers recycling a single spurious factoid. I am admittedly making bold assumptions about a paper I can't read, but I believe the Bunyard and Brine paper is WP:FRINGE pseudohistory, which casts doubt on the reliability of the work by subsequent authors who repeat their claims uncritically -- if they fail a basic fact check, they are not reliable sources (all relevant sources have very few citations in Google Scholar). If there were reliable sources that debunked this pseudohistory then that would strengthen GNG, but I found none. 11wx (talk) 17:59, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

  Just realised who you are! Good to see you up and around, @11wx! Complete coincidence we would cross paths at AfD. I just so happen to agree with that assessment, which is why I amended my !vote. WP:ATD-R is preferable here, as the term "Vedic square" is used across sources and is a valid search term. Would you support redirection over deletion? 11WB 💬 18:07, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and Education. 11WB 💬 01:28, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per David Eppstein. This is trivial and has trivial coverage. Also, there's something wrong with the formatting of this page. Bearian (talk) 17:23, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
  • Previous delsort notice didn't close the small tag. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:02, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Rasha Thadani

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Rasha Thadani
• Articles for deletion/Rasha Thadani (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Rasha Thadani (3rd nomination)

Rasha Thadani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Plenty of WP:NEWSORGINDIA but not significant coverage to meet GNG or ANYBIO. Yes, she may fall under WP:NACTOR but still needs to have the coverage to support per ANYBIO. I do not see it here. CNMall41 (talk) 05:53, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and India. CNMall41 (talk) 05:54, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Maharashtra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:40, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep - clears GNG from the Hindustan Times source, the The Statesman source, and the NDTV source, and also definitely clears NACTOR through major roles in two notable productions (Azaad Srinivasa Mangapuram) Jishara (talk) 13:42, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Strong keep - The nomination appears pretty conclusory to me. They just lump the sources together as "plenty of NEWSORGINDIA" without actually showing why the reliable independent sources in the article don't satisfy WP:GNG requirements. Just dropping "NEWSORGINDIA" isn't enough to prove someone isn't notable. In the article, there is good independent coverage from outlets like The Hindu, The Indian Express, India Today, Cinema Express, Hindustan Times. And on the day of release of subject's new movie, just after this nomination, reviews came for Srinivasa Mangapuram and reviews on her acting in Azaad were already there before this, sources of reviews talk about subject's performance. Sources like ANI or basic press releases can be removed or replaced as @Honeybrowneyes has raised concerns about it but that's just normal cleanup and editing procedure, basically pages keep on improving in wikipedia all the time, it doesn't mean the whole article fails GNG. Nominator mentioned WP:NACTOR might apply but doesn't explain why an actress who landed credited major roles in two notable movies, complete with independent review of Azaad (second movie reviews came after nomination), somehow misses the bar. I have removed the NDTV source already, and editors can clean up the weaker or promotional links (if they think any such type sources exist), but the actual independent coverage is more than enough to keep the article. Wikipicked (talk) 04:20, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete and Draftify The article still needs much better sources to cite.

1. Two of the sources are from Asian News International (see: WP:RSPANI) on which there still remains no consensus on WP:ICTFSOURCES.

2. As already mentioned by User:CNMall41, most of the sources are WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Particularly this interview of hers for Femina appears quite WP:NEWSORGINDIA.

3. Also churnalism. 'Who is Rasha Thadani' by NDTV is literally a web story. A very low-quality citation, in my humble opinion.

4. This The Hindu citation (ref. no. 9 and 10) and this The Hindu citation (ref. no. 15) are duplicate references (see: WP:DUPCITES) and one should be removed and other invoked.

5. Only five citations (see note for latter) have bylines, the rest are published by 'entertainment desk' or similar names.

:Note: In this citation, the article claims it's written by Vinita Kumar but when you go through it, you see her name nowhere but rather 'India Today Entertainment Desk.' At the end, 'published by Anurag Bohra' is mentioned.

References

Honeybrowneyes (talk) 15:26, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

This version was live when you responded in this Afd.

I agree with some of your sourcing concerns. I've already removed the NDTV web story, and I have no objection to replacing ANI or other routine or promotional references where stronger sources are available. On the other hand, I don't think those issues, by themselves, demonstrate that the subject fails WP:GNG, if that's the reason why you're leaning towards delete. In the 4th point you said there were duplicate sources, they are not duplicate sources, the second citation was reused. Wikipicked (talk) 04:54, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

I appreciate that. I have struck through the points regarding NDTV web story and The Hindu reference. Honeybrowneyes (talk) 07:33, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

NDTV is a collection of Instagram posts and The Hindu is a non-bylined fancruft article. Nothing that is useful for notability. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:54, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: To meet NACTOR the subject should have played significant roles in multiple productions which I cannot find here. Fails both GNG and NACTOR. Thilsebatti (talk) 07:24, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - Only two film appearances. None of the sources described or covered about her "work" exclusively. Her only notable work is a song from her debut film. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 07:27, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Papa Kehte Hain (2026 TV series)

Papa Kehte Hain (2026 TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Copy and paste move from Draft:Papa Kehte Hain. WP:DRAFTOBJECT applies - the draft was previously draftified. Fails WP:NTVSERIES, references are PR pieces. Fails WP:V. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 22:26, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 22:26, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Note: History merge has been complete, no outstanding cut paste issues. Sennecaster (Chat) 01:31, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Draftify - this isn't ready for mainspace. Sources are routine marketing fluff There are some formatting issues with those sources, it's highly unlikely the actual date on them is 2021 when this is a 2026 unreleased production.

List of Janata Dal breakaway parties

List of Janata Dal breakaway parties (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This formal merge proposal was incorrectly opened on the article's talk page. Following the March 2026 RfC, formal merge discussions are now held at AfD rather than the historical Proposed article mergers process (PAM). I've moved the discussion accordingly per WP:TPO.

Moved from Talk:Janata Parivar § Merge

 – FaviFake (talk) 21:51, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Merge

Both articles (Janata Parivar & List of Janata Dal breakaway parties) appear to be about the same topic. Both Wikidata items are also separate except for these two articles: Q66789377 (mr & te) & Q6150838 (fr, pa, ur)

Pinging people who edited either of the two: @Skyfall62, LakhnawiNawab, PriParaIdolLaala, Kumar Dayal, Arnav Nalin, Plutonimus, Coderhs, GünniX, and Dev Adhi: Braganza (talk) 20:57, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Merge per nominator's rationale. FaviFake (talk) 21:52, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, Lists, and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:55, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep The topic is notable on its own. Orientls (talk) 15:50, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Merge per nomination. List of Janata Dal breakaway parties does not have enough SIGCOV for its own article. Khalitate (talk) 05:11, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Merge per nominator's argument. Does not require a separate article of its own due to lack of coverage. Farhanansari1994 (talk) 08:38, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Purushottam Das

Purushottam Das (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating for deletion under WP:GNG and WP:MUSICIAN. The article fails to demonstrate significant, independent, non-trivial coverage in reliable secondary sources. The existing references are minimal and do not establish the depth of coverage required to satisfy general notability requirements. A search for this entity did not return sufficient secondary coverage to pass WP:N. Itz.mas10 (talk) 17:18, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and Bands and musicians. Itz.mas10 (talk) 17:18, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:02, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Rajasthan-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:35, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

G. Eshwar Reddy

G. Eshwar Reddy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage, mostly passing mentions. The interview links are reliable but not independent. DareshMohan (talk) 15:31, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep - large list of Telugu films he served as director for that each pass notability gets him through NCREATIVE. Jishara (talk) 15:47, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. Shellwood (talk) 15:56, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep. Very much passes WP:NCREATIVE. 🎆 Brynn Who Likes Editing | talk w/ me! 17:06, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Comment: Major confusion. The two interview sources are referring to director V Eshwar Reddy (director of Mee Sreyobhilashi, Manorama, and Brahmi Gadi Katha) not G Eshwar Reddy: . Does that change your vote @Jishara: @Brynn Who Likes Editing:? DareshMohan (talk) 17:42, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Comment: No, it doesn't. NCREATIVE doesn't depend on the sourcing - it cares about creative works that are notable. And this director does in fact have those works. Jishara (talk) 18:18, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

I agree with Jishara here. NCREATIVE is about the works. 🎆 Brynn Who Likes Editing | talk w/ me! 20:22, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Andhra Pradesh-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Aazad Samaj Party

Aazad Samaj Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging the Aazad Samaj Party article to Aazad Samaj Party (Kanshi Ram) because nearly all the information in the former article is largely similar to the latter and is about the same political party. The official name of the party is "Aazad Samaj Party (Kanshi Ram)" as stated by their own official website . The "Aazad Samaj Party (Kanshi Ram)" also has more information than the "Aazad Samaj Party" article. Linkin Prankster (talk) 15:34, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and India. Linkin Prankster (talk) 15:34, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Uttar Pradesh. Shellwood (talk) 15:57, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Merge per WP:OVERLAP. FaviFake (talk) 17:26, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Kings Matriculation Higher Secondary School

Kings Matriculation Higher Secondary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in GNG as well as WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE yielded some directories, listicles and two ROUTINE article, but no sources with SIGCOV. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 14:46, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Tamil Nadu. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 14:46, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Bhaktavatsalam Vidyashram

Bhaktavatsalam Vidyashram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Ambattur#Educational institutions because this fails in GNG as well as WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE yielded a number of ROUTINE results coverage and some directories, but no SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 14:42, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Tamil Nadu. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 14:42, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Ambattur#Educational institutions as per nominator's rationale, and cite the source used in the original article. 🎆 Brynn Who Likes Editing | talk w/ me! 15:01, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

List of states and union territories of India by suicide rate

List of states and union territories of India by suicide rate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Suicide in India because this list by itself meets WP:SHORTTEXT, WP:DUP, WP:OVERLAP, and WP:MERGECON. This list existing by itself is not a good page for our readers for various reasons. WP:NOTDB means that random lists should not exist on Wikipedia, because it is not a statistics website. The Suicide in India page is not very developed. However, when it is further developed, it would be useful for the reader of that page to have a break-down by state. Articles on suicide in certain states would also be notable. Thus, when that page is further developed, this page would become redundant. If we merge this page into that page, then the page will become more developed and the reader will benefit. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 12:51, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Psychology, and Lists. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 12:51, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:18, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

List of states and union territories of India by population

List of states and union territories of India by population (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Demographics of India#Vital statistics because of WP:DUP, WP:OVERLAP, and WP:MERGECON. Although this is a featured list, it is not a very good page. It could easily be put in a page like Population of India. Yet, this page currently redirects to Demographics of India, so it should be merged there. Other information can also be put in States and union territories of India HerrHeulsuse (talk) 12:56, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 12:56, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:18, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose the Demographics article is very long and does not currently have this information so I don't see the overlap and it is not necessary to add this there. I'd otherwise suggest States and union territories of India but this list has the historical and density information so that wouldn't work either. Reywas92^Talk 14:11, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

  The information about the history of India's population can be put in Demographics of India#History HerrHeulsuse (talk) 14:14, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

  Nah. As I said that page is more than big enough already to justify a split, and it still wouldn't include the other statistics in the table. — Reywas92^Talk 15:19, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

(Strong oppose) same reason as Reywas92. ~2026-42678-24 (talk) 17:33, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

List of million-plus urban agglomerations in India

List of million-plus urban agglomerations in India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Urban agglomerations in India because of WP:NOTDB. A cut-off at a million is chosen for no set reason, and there is nothing encyclopedic about collecting a set of items based on a certain characteristic. The cited content in the Census section does not directly mention the topic of the article. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 12:39, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Lists, and India. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 12:39, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Dude, it's perfectly acceptable to have an arbitary cut-off! Urban agglomerations in India has a cut-off of 100 places for no set reason! List of United States cities by population has a cut-off of 100,000, it's totally discretionary by article and these are all absolutely encyclopedic! We tend not to include whatever threshold the list uses in the title but come on... However unlike your other nominations these do actually overlap so a merge would be appropriate IF you merge the areas and whatever else is not already there. Reywas92^Talk 15:46, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

  This means that all those pages need to go as well, so that Wikipedia better conforms to its policies HerrHeulsuse (talk) 05:00, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  This seems to be like a WP:ALLORNOTHING argument. Population lists are not WP:NOTDB unless it lists down an entire census file as is. However, the articles can be considered for merging as there are similarities to both and as there is information in List of million-plus urban agglomerations in India that is not there in Urban agglomerations in India. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 09:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

List of towns in India by population

List of towns in India by population (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTSTATS, this should be deleted. This is the type of things you would find in a statistics website, not on Wikipedia. Anything encyclopedic about the population of India can be put in that article. The fact that other pages also break Wikipedia policy is not a strong reason to keep it. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 12:31, 29 July 2026 (UTC) Edited 14:31, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Lists, and India. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 12:31, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep Wikipedia has plenty of statistics and this is fine. It's just a subset that extends List of cities in India by population. NOTSTATS says "Statistics that lack context or explanation can reduce readability and may be confusing" – nothing here is unreadable or confusing. It says "statistics should be placed in tables to enhance readability" – this is a table. There's also no other list of towns in India on Wikipedia so the suggestion to merge to India is baffling. If you can show me that these places are listed for each state that would be better. Reywas92^Talk 14:18, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of states and union territories of India. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:10, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

List of states and union territories of India by area

List of states and union territories of India by area (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to List of states and union territories of India because WP:NOTDB. This just lists Indian states by a numeral characteristic, which is not allowed on Wikipedia, as it is not encyclopedic. WP:NOPAGE also applies, since this could be included as a table. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 08:25, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Lists and India. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 08:25, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Merge to List of states and union territories of India. The entire content is a single sortable data column, which belongs in the parent list rather than as a standalone page per WP:NOPAGE. Nothing is lost and readers get the material in one place. Onatic (talk) 09:53, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Merge This is actually duplicative and mergeable unlike the population list. Reywas92^Talk 14:16, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Merge per nominator's rationale. FaviFake (talk) 22:06, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Ananta Mandal

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Ananta Mandal
• Articles for deletion/Ananta Mandal (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Ananta Mandal (3rd nomination)

Ananta Mandal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An artist lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. Last of The Time (talk) 05:57, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Arts, India, and West Bengal. Last of The Time (talk) 05:57, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:47, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep, just the opposite, from what I can read of the sources and related material the subject easily meets GNG. And per the results of the first two deletion attempts, one to Keep and the other no consensus but with GNG sources a factor in each. From the close of the first AfD: "Sourcing concerns appear to have been remedied." From the close of the second AfD: "Evidence of substantive coverage in reliable sources has been shown." Randy Kryn (talk) 10:01, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, no critical reviews, no museum shows, no public collections, no ULAN or other artist registry, too early for wiki --SalomonSalmon (talk) 20:06, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep - the article is imperfect, but I see Indian Express, Hindustan Times, and Bombay Times - that's plenty sufficient to clear GNG. Jishara (talk) 19:03, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Strong Keep – The subject appears to satisfy the requirements of WP and WP:ARTIST. There are multiple reliable, independent secondary sources that provide significant coverage of the artist and his work, beyond routine mentions or primary sources.

Examples of significant coverage from reliable sources include:

Multifarious Impressions of Ananta Mandal – The Times of India. Capturing Landscapes on His Canvas – The Times of India. Treat for the senses – Millennium Post. Rich Canvases Saturate Watercolor Event – Houston Chronicle, which discusses Ananta Mandal's award-winning work at the Watercolor Art Society–Houston exhibition.

Ananta Mandal: The monsoon muse - painting rain soaked realities – Astaguru. The subject's artworks have been auctioned and exhibited by AstaGuru, one of India's leading fine art auction houses, further demonstrating recognition within the professional art community.

The subject has also held multiple solo exhibitions at established art institutions, including Jehangir Art Gallery, Nehru Centre, and Academy of Fine Arts, Kolkata, demonstrating sustained professional recognition.

The article also documents awards and recognitions from established organizations, including the Bombay Art Society, AIFACS, Academy of Fine Arts, Kolkata, Government College of Art & Craft, The San Diego Watercolor Society, The Watercolor Art Society-Houston and the Western Federation of Watercolor Societies.

Taken together, these independent sources and achievements demonstrate that the subject has received significant coverage and satisfies Wikipedia's notability requirements.

This is the article's 3rd AfD nomination. Unless substantial new evidence or policy-based arguments have been presented that were not considered in the previous discussions, repeated nominations may be unnecessary. Based on the available evidence, I support keeping the article. If consensus is to keep, the AfD templates should be removed following the close of this discussion. WitchScarlet (talk) 23:28, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Withdrawn – After taking a closer look at the in-depth coverage provided by User:WitchScarlet, the subject meets WP:GNG. Last of The Time (talk) 05:19, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. I see this has been withdrawn, but as I created a source assessment last night, I'd like to add it here as part of the record.

It looks like this watercolorist has won a handful of regional watercolor awards and has had reviews in The Times of India , Bombay Times, The Indian Express, Hindustan Times, and the Afternoon Despatch & Courier see (Wikipedia:NEWSORGINDIA). 3 of the articles are "reviews" of the Nehru Centre Art Gallery GROUP exhibit in 2011. There is no particular notability for the Nehru Centre Art Gallery exhibition. The issue seems for be whether multiple mentions in borderline publications adds up to "significant coverage". Same with the regional "awards". Do multiple regional awards adds up to a significant award? In the previous AFD discussions, the quality of the sources is never convincingly presented. That is why the article keeps getting nominated for deletion. This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. He has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won significant critical attention, or been represented within the permanent collections of any notable galleries or museums. I would argue that is is time for this article to go. The sum of the sources do not add up to notable. I think mine is a substantial policy-based argument. WP:TOOSOON. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 17:50, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Source assessment table prepared by User:WomenArtistUpdates

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://articles.talentsofworld.com/ananta-mandal-an-indian-artist/			This looks like a user generated profile. ARtistsof the World has become https://talentsofworld.com/ananta-mandal-an-indian-artist	✘ No
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/people/Multifarious-impressions-of-Ananta-Mandal/articleshow/27172339.cms	The Times of India		puff piece	? Unknown
https://anantamandal.com/blog/world-art-dubai-ananta-mandals-solo-exhibition/			primary source blog post	✘ No
https://anantamandal.com/press/the-times-of-india-26-march-2011-mumbai	Bombay Time via artist's website		Review of exhbition at the Nehru Centre Art Gallery. Artist can Rent space in this gallery.	✘ No
https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/mumbai/painting-his-love/	The Indian Express		anoterh review of the Nehru Centre Art Gallery	✘ No
"Get a glimpse of Mumbai's charisma on canvas". Hindustan Times. 22 March 2011.	Hindustan Times		another review of the Nehru Centre Art Gallery https://anantamandal.com/press/hindustan-times-22-march-2011-mumbai	? Unknown
"A journey from reality by Ananta Mandal". Afternoon. 4 May 2010.	Afternoon Despatch & Courier Mumbai India		no by line. Weird column that relates to no event	? Unknown
https://www.nwws.org/portals/0/PDFs/JulyAugust2017HotPress.pdf			$500.00 prize from the Northwest Watercolor Society	✘ No
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/entertainment/theater/article/Rich-canvases-saturate-watercolor-event-4373940.php			Coverage of the award at the Northwest Watercolor Society	✘ No
https://www.nwws.org/portals/0/PDFs/JulyAugust2017HotPress.pdf			Another link to $500.00 prize from the Northwest Watercolor Society	✘ No
gale.com/apps/doc/A238274471/ITOF?u=wikipedia&sid=bookmark-ITOF&xid=a6f8ef6f	"Western Federation of Watercolor Societies exhibition held in Utah."		dead link to "Watercolor" magazine. Does not seem to be a national publication	? Unknown
gale.com/apps/doc/A155401931/ITOF?u=wikipedia&sid=bookmark-ITOF&xid=17fcbd42	San Diego Watercolor Society's 26th International Exhibition award winners		dead link to American Artist	? Unknown
gale.com/apps/doc/A214525552/ITOF?u=wikipedia&sid=bookmark-ITOF&xid=5f16497b	"North East Watercolor Society 2009 international exhibition winners."		dead link to Watercolor magazine	? Unknown
gale.com/apps/doc/A167026987/ITOF?u=wikipedia&sid=bookmark-ITOF&xid=8c670000.	"Awards presented at the 32nd Annual Western Federation of Watercolor Societies Exhibition."		dead link to American Artist	? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Strong keep – clearly notable – As with very strong independent sources the artist is meet clearly notable WP:NARTIST. More than 12 years after the article was created, it remains well sourced and supported by significant independent coverage, many significant shows, multiple significant all India and International Juried art shows awards, satisfying GNG. Based on the available sourcing and the outcomes of the previous two AfD discussions, I do not see a policy-based justification for deletion.

I'm not sure why this article is being nominated for AfD for a third time, as I don't see any new policy-based evidence showing that the subject no longer meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. However the deletion has been withdrawn.

I'd like to add the source assessment table here. Examples of reliable, independent sources that provide significant coverage include:

Accordingly, I believe the appropriate outcome is Keep. RedRabbit7 (talk) 03:19, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Source assessment table prepared by User:RedRabbit7

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/spotlight/multifarious-impressions-of-ananta-mandal/articleshow/27172339.cms	The Times of India		Significant media coverage by The Times of India	✔ Yes
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/entertainment/theater/article/Rich-canvases-saturate-watercolor-event-4373940.php	Houston Chronicle		The subject won the First Place Award for the artwork Waiting for the Morning from the Watercolor Art Society–Houston, USA.	✔ Yes
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/spotlight/capturing-landscapes-on-his-canvas/articleshow/26580729.cms	The Times of India		Independent coverage of the subject's solo exhibition at Kamalnayan Bajaj Art Gallery, Mumbai.	✔ Yes
https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/mumbai/painting-his-love/	The Indian Express		Independent coverage of the subject's solo exhibition at Nehru Centre Art Gallery, Mumbai.	✔ Yes
https://www.astaguru.com/blogs/ananta-mandal-the-monsoon-muse---painting-rain-soaked-realities-511	India's leading fine art auction houses AstaGuru		The subject's artworks have been auctioned and exhibited by AstaGuru	✔ Yes
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chandigarh/Mandals-country-canvas-in-town-for-art-lovers/articleshow/17633151.cms	The Times of India, Chandigarh		Independent coverage of the subject's solo exhibition at Sector 9, Chandigarh	✔ Yes
https://www.gurukahanmuseum.org/exhibits/ananta-mandal	Guru Kahan Art Museum, Gujarat		The subject's work is on permanent display at the museum.	✔ Yes
https://www.millenniumpost.in/features/creative-india-takes-centre-stage-670157	Millennium Post		Independent coverage of the subject's solo exhibition at Lokayata Art Gallery, New Delhi.	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Mohammad Junaid (volunteer)

Mohammad Junaid (volunteer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. All the sources are related to some viral incidents involved with him. Thilsebatti (talk) 05:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. Thilsebatti (talk) 05:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and Uttar Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:49, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep - it's undeniable IMO that he has the sigcov from Hindustan Times, news18, Muslim Mirror, India Today, ThePrint, etc etc. What is more of a concern is BLP1E, but I think he squeaks by that because there's two distinct incidents - his detention, and the purported rift. What I think needs to be done is that rift needs to be added to the article. But in article sourcing shows notability. Jishara (talk) 19:07, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep reliable Indian newspapers have covered him significantly. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 07:08, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep He faced government crackdown for helping the student protests with basic necessities like food and water, this is very well documented.Who is Junaid Malik? Man who distributed free food at CJP’s Jantar Mantar protest

Ghaziabad student Junaid who fed CJP protesters moves Supreme Court over ‘police harassment’

Junaid, who fed CJP protesters for 35 days, alleges police picked him up and questioned him

CJP volunteer Junaid claims Delhi cops detained him over protest food distribution ~2026-42092-10 (talk) 11:38, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Not important or notable enough. Kalpesh Manna 2002 (talk) 12:26, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Delete. wp:gng, WP:BLP1E — Preceding unsigned comment added by JnhoIVe (talk • contribs) 05:59, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 06:07, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Basirhat#Education. (non-admin closure) EmilyR34 (talk) 03:46, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Basirhat Hari Mohan Dalal Girls' High School

Basirhat Hari Mohan Dalal Girls' High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:44, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and West Bengal. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:05, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 04:36, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. No in-depth independent coverage, so WP:NSCHOOL is not met. Onatic (talk) 11:19, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to Basirhat#Education, where it's listed, as an ATD-R. 100+ years old school, but additional searches didn't yield anything to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:10, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Panchita#Education. (non-admin closure) EmilyR34 (talk) 03:43, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Chanda Lalit Mohan High School

Chanda Lalit Mohan High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:40, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and West Bengal. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:05, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Panchita#Education, where it's mentioned, as an ATD-R. Additional searches didn't yield anything with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:22, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to Panchita#Education per BhikhariInformer. Additional searches produce nothing meeting WP:SIGCOV, and the school is already mentioned at the target, which makes this the appropriate WP:ATD-R. Onatic (talk) 11:20, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Garakupi#Education. (non-admin closure) EmilyR34 (talk) 03:42, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Garakupi High School

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Garakupi High School
• Articles for deletion/Garakupi High School (2nd nomination)

Garakupi High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:39, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and West Bengal. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:04, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Garakupi#Education, where it's mentioned, as an ATD-R. Found nothing with SIGCOV in additional searches to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:20, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Garakupi § Education per BhikhariInformer Axolitl (talk | contribs) 04:11, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to Garakupi#Education per BhikhariInformer and Axolitl. There is no WP:SIGCOV to support a standalone article and the target already mentions the school. Onatic (talk) 11:21, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ranaghat#Education. (non-admin closure) CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 07:22, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Convent of Jesus and Mary, Ranaghat

Convent of Jesus and Mary, Ranaghat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:39, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, Christianity, India, and West Bengal. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:03, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Ranaghat#Education, where it's listed, as an ATD-R. Additional searches yielded nothing with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:13, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Kherva#Education per the redirect proposed by BhikhariInformer as an ATD-R, which went unopposed. No case for standalone notability was made in the discussion. (non-admin closure) EmilyR34 (talk) 03:38, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Shree Jaykorbai Vidyamandir

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Shree Jaykorbai Vidyamandir
• Articles for deletion/Shree Jaykorbai Vidyamandir (2nd nomination)

Shree Jaykorbai Vidyamandir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Gujarat. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:03, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Kherva#Education, where it's mentioned, as an ATD-R. Just another ROTM school. Found nothing with SIGCOV in additional searches to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:10, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Jamuna Das Choudhury

Jamuna Das Choudhury (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG,WP:V. Only source is a primary government gazette. Article itself acknowledges "detailed biographies... are scarce in publicly available records." No independent secondary coverage exists. Colonial honorific titles alone do not establish notability. Lone Wolf ^howl 06:10, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and India. Lone Wolf ^howl 06:10, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Jharkhand. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:50, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - for lack of significant coverage. One source is not enough for any biography. Bearian (talk) 19:34, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Needs more input by legitimate editors - the nominator is blocked as a sock.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:06, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Strong suspicion of LLM use as the repeated "sources say" text is very typical. Sentence cited by nominator is also concerning. M kuhner (talk) 20:59, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Leema Babu

Leema Babu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no significant coverage in multiple published reliable independent secondary sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking (currently one 2014 newspaper article and a YouTube video). Google Search reveals no further SIGCOV - mainly social media and some interview content (ie: primary) Paul W (talk) 17:09, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Withdrawn by nominator. Speedy keep reason #1. Clearly notable. Paul W (talk) 11:02, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and India. Shellwood (talk) 17:15, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:35, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Did you actually search for refs? I found a lot. Kailash29792 (talk) 01:21, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

  Ah. I did a Google News search which showed only a few refs. I may withdraw the AfD. Paul W (talk) 07:57, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: So is this being withdrawn, or... what are the sources like?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:47, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep per NACTOR - Yentha Nerathilum, Dhoni Kabadi Kuzhu, Panchagni (TV series), and Maanga (film), all notable works she played a notable role in. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 01:09, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep. Per previous comment, and some existing sources as pointed out by Kailash29792 Ajheindel (talk) 02:09, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep as she has significant notability passing WP:NACTOR. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 07:02, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Abhishek Singh (civil servant)

Abhishek Singh (civil servant) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All the references are Press releases and routine announcement, fails WP:GNG. Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 06:14, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 06:14, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Nagaland and Uttar Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:01, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — CactusWriter ^(talk) 18:58, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Samandar (film)

Samandar (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources predating the film's release fail WP:NFSOURCES and the film was not widely distributed. A WP:BEFORE search returns only the two reviews already in the article. Only one is from a GNG-worthy publication, while the other is not. Fails WP:NFOE and WP:NFIC Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 15:03, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Entertainment, India, and Gujarat. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 15:03, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — CactusWriter ^(talk) 17:48, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep - both sources, at least based on my quick check, are bylined, major regional news sites in Gujarat - and this is a film in Gujarati. seems to squeak through NFILM #1 Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 00:51, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Gujaratfirst.com is certainly not a WP:GNG worthy publication. It is part of a relatively recent media venture (launched around 2021) under a private group and even its own About page is largely self-promotional, highlighting the parent company and its achievements rather than addressing editorial credibility or independence. The platform is also more focused on revenue generation and audience reach.
• This is a 2024 film and if a recent release does not have reviews in reliable sources, then it is a clear indication of lack of notability. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:15, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

St. Francis of Assisi Convent High School

St. Francis of Assisi Convent High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:07, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Gujarat. Shellwood (talk) 13:36, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:28, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: Additional searches yielded numerous false positives. Scavenging through them, I didn't find anything with SIGOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 00:50, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Has a previous AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Francis of Assisi Convent, and thus not a candidate for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:45, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Fails NSCHOOL. Only primary sourced provided. LibStar (talk) 01:38, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Fails WP:GNG. It's worth noting that the page was kept in its previous nomination for deletion essentially because high schools were assumed to be notable and the presumption that reliable sources may be found. However, this is no longer the case about high schools, and no sources have surfaced in the 17 years since that discussion. – Insincere Giraffe (talk) 21:16, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Tirthapati Institution

Tirthapati Institution (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 12:12, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: West Bengal, India, and Schools. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 12:23, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Education-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:03, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 20:59, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Fails NSCHOOL. Just a directory listing provided as a source. LibStar (talk) 01:37, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

S. George

S. George (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG, few passing mentions. Accesscrawl (talk) 10:04, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Film, Television, India, and Kerala. Accesscrawl (talk) 10:04, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 18:07, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Nebish Benson

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Nebish Benson
• Articles for deletion/Nebish Benson (2nd nomination)

Nebish Benson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject only played minor roles as child artist movies. Fails GNG and NACTOR because of no mjaor roles in multiple productions. Thilsebatti (talk) 05:01, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, India, and Kerala. Thilsebatti (talk) 05:01, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: I suspect this is the same subject as the first nomination from 2017, which ended in deletion. This iteration probably should have come to AfD much sooner than it did: it has been tagged as a poorly-sourced potential NBIO failure almost since its recreation in November 2023, was briefly tagged for PROD for two minutes in May 2024 before the proposer saw the big red text announcing the previous AfD's existence and self-reverted (but did not follow up with a second AfD or anything else), and based on the logs was only just returned to NPP this week after its initial 2024 review was vacated. No opinion on the article itself, but the signs–and the UPE blocks on both the 2024 reviewer and the article creator–certainly aren't encouraging (and that, combined with a G4 deletion not too long after the 2017 AfD, might mean that the salt shouldn't be taken off the table either). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:16, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete and salt, no sign of the subject passing GNG or NACTOR, and as per Wcquidditch above analysis very likely paid editing was underway. Cavarrone 04:44, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 20:55, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Brij Bhoomi (film)

Brij Bhoomi (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It is a promotional article of a film. The article was made by a blocked user. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheTarget2027 (talk • contribs) 04:28, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 July 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:29, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Shellwood (talk) 22:41, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — CactusWriter ^(talk) 01:11, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Sanskar Bharti

Sanskar Bharti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm nominating this for delete as there aren't available online English references to the history and origin of Sanskar Bharti besides the primary source (the organization's website) to prove it. This entity seems to be an office or administrative arm of a political party in India called RSS. I'd have considered merge if there were available secondary articles. ABehjat (talk) 20:49, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Organizations, Politics, and India. ABehjat (talk) 20:49, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  Delete because of no significant secondary coverage. Entychologist (talk) 21:58, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: for clarity, English Wikipedia sources are not required to be in English, they are simply preferred when available. That of course can be a moot point if there is no SIGCOV in any language. (No opinion on that front.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:53, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:54, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep - my searches on Google News and Books found dozens of potential sources, in English. Some are self-published, some are passing mentions, and others are clearly not independent of the cultural organization or its political affiliation; but there are a few that constitute significant coverage, and I added two such sources. Bearian (talk) 03:49, 30 July 2026 (UTC) P.S. Obviously, this is not an endorsement of the subject or of RSS; it's just a fact of notability. Nobody claims that Fox News is not notable, because it's basically the media wing of a major political party. Bearian (talk) 03:52, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — CactusWriter ^(talk) 01:13, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

R. D. Raja

R. D. Raja (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similar to , the sources are not independent of the subject or are passing mentions. Fails WP:GNG. Redirect to Remo, his most significant work. DareshMohan (talk) 18:48, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. Shellwood (talk) 18:59, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment, no opinion on notability, but I oppose a redirect, as I see no evidence Remo is the film he is mostly associated to, and those looking for this person would be better served by the search results page, listing all his credits and not just one. --Cavarrone 18:50, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:34, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Sridevi Apalla

Sridevi Apalla (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOO EARLY. Move to a draft or redirect to Court: State vs a Nobody. All of the sources are routine announcements about her upcoming film. No significant independent reliable coverage. DareshMohan (talk) 18:38, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and India. Shellwood (talk) 18:46, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Andhra Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:01, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:34, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Aji Senior Secondary School

Aji Senior Secondary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE yielded nothing with SIGCOV....just some directories and listicles. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 12:23, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Kerala. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 12:23, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:40, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Fails NSCHOOL. Just a directory listing provided as a source. LibStar (talk) 01:37, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Sri Aurobindo School, Sambalpur

Sri Aurobindo School, Sambalpur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE didn't yield any sources with SIGCOV....just some directories and listicles. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 08:24, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Odisha. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 08:24, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:41, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Fails NSCHOOL. LibStar (talk) 01:38, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Agree with nom - also don't see any mention on Sri Aurobindo Ashram page. Asteramellus (talk) 01:41, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Atomic Energy Central School

Atomic Energy Central School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:54, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:16, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: Since it's a school chain, it should be judged by WP:NORG and it fails to meet the same. Found nothing with CORPDEPTH in additional searches to warrant standalone notability. There are few ROUTINE coverages about one particular branch, but nothing about the chain of schools in general. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:48, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: I've got no opinion on this matter, but I have given notice to two Wiki Projects that might not have been given any notice, which I believe would be unfair. Bearian (talk) 02:08, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
• Merge to Atomic Energy Education Society, which administers the schools. Arguably that isn't notable either, but it can also be further merged to Department of Atomic Energy. regards, TryKid ^{[dubious – discuss]} 03:11, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

  @BhikhariInformer: can you reassess your !vote with merge being an option. TryKid ^{[dubious – discuss]} 14:15, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 17:40, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Merge to Atomic Energy Education Society, as suggested by TryKid. Few lines on that page appears to be a good ATD. Thanks for the ping btw! BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 15:14, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

2026 Maharaja Trophy KSCA T20

2026 Maharaja Trophy KSCA T20 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Maharaja Trophy KSCA T20 because, no WP:SIGCOV on independent WP:reliable sources other than the WP:ROUTINE coverage; fails WP:GNG for a standalone article. Vestrian24Bio 11:58, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Sports, Cricket, and India. Vestrian24Bio 11:58, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 14:26, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete as not enough coverage to have a separate article of its own.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:33, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

The Sky is Ours

The Sky is Ours (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The movie does not fulfil any criteria laid out by WP:NFILM. Astra Travasso (talk) 04:43, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Astra Travasso (talk) 04:43, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: The nomination does not address the four citations on the page. Is there a reason why Vanglaini or The Aizal Post are not considered reliable sources for the purpose of notability? Toughpigs (talk) 23:03, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

  The Aizawl Post and Vanglaini articles are recycled press releases. They do not contribute towards notability as per WP:NIFLM. One can use Google Translate and verify the text choosing Mizo to English as the language options. Astra Travasso (talk) 04:41, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 06:02, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Mengu Suokhrie

Mengu Suokhrie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the page does not fulfil WP:SINGER or WP: It also does not have coverage to fulfil WP:SIGCOV. Their one significant movie was almost a decade ago which did not garner her any significant award or media coverage outside Nagaland. Thereby, it does not fulfil WP:NACTOR. Astra Travasso (talk) 04:40, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, Women, Film, Music, and India. Astra Travasso (talk) 04:40, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Nagaland-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:51, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:39, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 06:02, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Saurashtra University

Saurashtra University (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG. Also has significant amounts of WP:COPYVIO. The entire history section and the organization and administration page is copy and pasted from and . Finally, the last section is also copy and pasted directly from , leaving literally no sections of this article original text. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 10:59, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Gujarat. Shellwood (talk) 11:03, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: The subject is clearly notable. I checked the GNews hits up to 4 pages.....plethora of sources with SIGCOV are there to warrant standalone notability. But the COPYVIO issue here is so major, I ain't sure if this should be blown up and started over again. Or, maybe we can save the page and just remove the COPYVIO parts. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:34, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: we need context. Ping me after you add sources. Bearian (talk) 17:46, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:11, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep this has WP:SIGCOV although I will admit it is a poorly written page with no proper sourcing. Perhaps it can be salvaged. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 09:49, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Which sigcov? Geschichte (talk) 06:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  Ajheindel has identified a lot of significant coverage. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 06:56, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Weak Keep This is a notable profile but still written in promotional tone and no notable news sourcing done, it should be kept but at the warning of improving it in future.Rainfixer (talk) 05:24, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

  Improve with which sources? Geschichte (talk) 06:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep The university easily meets notability requirements WP:CORPUNIV it should be cleaned up and rewritten rather than deletion. Staticspector (talk) 16:15, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Assertions of notability are not evidence of notability. Sources, please.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:39, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Also, Copyvios have been deleted. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:45, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep. A quick google search shows many news articles about the university (quite a few related to corruption and scandals, but other articles as well). Here are a few since no one provided any sources before: . There are many beyond this as well. Ajheindel (talk) 01:41, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

India Book House

India Book House (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable publisher. None of the sources satisfy WP:NCORP. As its operations were merged into Oxford Bookstore and Stationery Company, I propose merging this article there. THE JIK (talk) 09:07, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. THE JIK (talk) 09:09, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:10, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:46, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete – The article does not demonstrate significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. As such, it fails to satisfy WP:NCORP. Last of The Time (talk) 05:36, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:52, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

2002 Qasim Nagar massacre

2002 Qasim Nagar massacre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

For an event to exist on Wikipedia, it must pass WP:NEVENT, which this does not. Google Books shows three pages of results, but most of these are not from reliable sources. This is because the author is often not specializing is any relevant field and the publisher is not reputable. Google Scholar shows 2 results, one of which is a wiki (self-described) and the other is an inaccessible citation. Google News shows some coverage shortly after the event. Then, most of the other coverage is not WP:SIGCOV, except for which is not from a reputable media outlet. Relevant concerns from the NEVENT page are WP:LASTING, WP:GEOSCOPE (local to Kashmir), WP:CASESTUDY, WP:ROUTINE (terrorist attacks in Kashmir are very, common compared to other regions) and WP:DIVERSE (only news sources) HerrHeulsuse (talk) 11:13, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Islam, Pakistan, India, and Jammu and Kashmir. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 11:13, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Events. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:22, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep The article already has several citations from both local and international outlets, including The Independent' (UK) and Voice of America (US), which challenges the WP:GEOSCOPE concern raised above. Also, a quick search found additional coverage not yet cited, including articles in The Guardian,"Massacre in Kashmir slum renews fear of war"] and BBC News, "Kashmir killings condemned"]. The frequency of Kashmir insurgency attacks doesn't make this one non-notable. And WP:ROUTINE typically refers to scheduled, everyday coverage like weddings or baseball games, not a massacre. SupermarketCake (talk) 03:19, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

WP:NEVENT says

"Many events receive coverage in the news and yet are not of historic or lasting importance. News organizations have criteria for content, i.e.

news values

, that differ from the criteria used by Wikipedia and encyclopedias. A violent crime, accidental death, or other media event may be interesting enough to reporters and news editors to justify coverage, but this will not always translate into sufficient notability for a Wikipedia article."

HerrHeulsuse (talk) 10:30, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Re: Significance, this attack appears on a U.S. Department of State list titled Chronology of Significant Terrorist Incidents, 2002. SupermarketCake (talk) 21:07, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

I'm inclined to think this is just a news story with no sustained secondary coverage. I tried to find a suitable merge target, but this is just isn't significant to any broader subject. Does the Qasim Nagar neighborhood have significant coverage besides a one-off event? If not, I'll support deleting or redirecting to List of terrorist incidents in Jammu and Kashmir. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 05:15, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

It probably does, in Kashmiri or another South Asian language, but we would need editors to work on it. I think that if we merge and redirect to your suggested page, then the history will be available to merge into a Qasim Nagar page if it is later created. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 10:29, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Regardless of what ends up happening to the event article, I've created an article for the location since I was able to find some coverage in Hindi and Urdu. It's barebones, especially because I was restrained in what information I grabbed from the sources, since I was reading them through machine translation. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:22, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:59, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 20:46, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep I added this as a reply above, since it was directly related to a reply from the nom, but am also posting here for the latest discussion.

Re: Significance, this attack appears on a U.S. Department of State list, aptly titled Chronology of Significant Terrorist Incidents, 2002.

Adding this: In reference to @Thebiguglyalien's comment on sustained secondary coverage, I'll agree that coverage is limited to 'lists of past attacks', (Times of India), passing mentions or remembrance articles from local outlets. However, the initial coverage was substantial and international (The Independent, VOA, Guardian, BBC, plus Tribune reporting and the above State Dept listing), which I'd argue meets WP:GNG on its own. SupermarketCake (talk) 21:47, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

WP:NEVENT:

• "a burst or spike of news reports does not automatically make an incident notable"
• "A violent crime, accidental death, or other media event may be interesting enough to reporters and news editors to justify coverage, but this will not always translate into sufficient notability for a Wikipedia article."

Being included in a U.S. Department list is not worth anything HerrHeulsuse (talk) 10:35, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Avaada Group

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Avaada Group
• Articles for deletion/Avaada Group (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Avaada Group (3rd nomination)

Avaada Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP as a WP:ROTM org conducting its business in a run of the mill manner 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 06:22, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, Environment, and India. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 06:22, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: both of the prior nominations ended in deletion, and if that happens yet again it might be time to bring out the salt. (On the other hand, the last nomination a few months ago was dominated by users since blocked for UPE and/or socking, a reminder that the disruption in this topic area over what articles should exist goes both ways.) No opinion beyond that. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:16, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: Dosent have any significance to the article per WP:SIGNIF, also consider salting the article also. ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 09:31, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep – Passes WP:NCORP, as the company has received in-depth coverage in multiple analyst reports such as , , , provided by Asian Development Bank and GlobalData. RGB49D (talk) 16:14, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 06:33, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Comment. I looked at the sources provided by RGB49D. The first one is an academic paper and appears reasonable. The second and third are reports prepared by the company and cannot be used for notability. The fourth is a business which offers to provide a report on this company, for money: that cannot be considered a published source. M kuhner (talk) 18:40, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

*Keep In addition to the sources identified by RGB49D the subject has received substantial coverage in other independent, reliable sources. Taken together, the available sourcing is enough to satisfy the WP:NCORP guideline. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KURTLEEMER (talk • contribs) 07:52, 23 July 2026 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE. ~SG5536B 22:29, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Where? Zalaraz (talk) 09:31, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete and salt Per nomination, due to lack of independent sources providing the significant coverage needed for an article (WP:ORGDEPTH), and also taking into consideration previous AfDs on the subject. Zalaraz (talk) 09:34, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

*:Comment , , , , This coverage provides significant, in-depth discussion of the subject and appears sufficient to satisfy the requirements WP:CORPDEPTH.KURTLEEMER (talk) 11:16, 30 July 2026 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE. ~SG5536B 22:29, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A source analysis would be helpful here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 15:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletions

• Koshur Anchar (via WP:PROD on 22 March 2025)

Other deletion discussions

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 January 16. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:16, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 January 16. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)