Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion and merging of articles related to Bands and musicians. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion and neither does removing an AfD from this page remove it from the main page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:deletion sorting|Bands and musicians|sig=~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Bands and musicians. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.


Purge page cache watch
Related deletion sorting

Bands and musicians

[edit]


Hawklords (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge to Hawkwind. Not enough sources distinguishing this from Hawkwind beyond it being a short-lived name change. No point in maintaining a separate article. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 16:49, 4 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Winwin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose draftifying because doesn't sufficiently prove separate notability from band via WP:NBANDMEMBER. Coverage is basically all about them int he content of the band; only separate activiity is participating in a few TV shows, but previous consensus on wikiproject was that this doesn't count to separate notability. grapesurgeon (talk) 02:40, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply


The Rolling Stones Irish Tour 1965 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to The Rolling Stones 1965 tours because that page already has the same info, with a few extra sources. This is an extra page for no apparent reason. There are also individual pages for every Stones tour that year, so I propose merging those too. These include:

– zmbro (talk) (cont) 18:12, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Support. It's hard to justify much of this content, but even harder to justify content forks for each leg of their 1965 touring schedule. Trumpetrep (talk) 21:02, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Support all mergers. We don't need to be this granular. SenshiSun (talk) 21:58, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Support all mergers per nominator's rationale. Useless articles. FaviFake (talk) 19:19, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Volvexzshawa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed drafification; WP:DRAFTOBJECT applies. Fails WP:NMUSICIAN, fails WP:V. Likely WP:TOOSOON 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 17:37, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Fragile Gang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm on the fence for this one, but it appears to fail WP:GNG. Evaluating the sources on the page, 1 has a passing mention of the band's existence (not WP:SIGCOV, 2 is an interview, 3 is a passing mention, 4 seems not WP:SIGCOV, 5 seems to be a good source to me, 6 doesn't appear to mention the band, 7 doesn't mention the band. With a WP:BEFORE search, I was still unable to find more proper WP:SIGCOV reliable sources. I think this fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG. Bungle491 (talk) 04:03, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Kross (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines. None of the references is an independent reliable source, and most of them could not possibly be regarded as substantial coverage either. At present the references in the article are:

  • Two copies, in two different publications, of word for word the same report of an interview with Kross, essentially a promotional piece distributed as a press release; an advertisement in all but name.
  • A piece published on a website which accepts user-submitted content, full from start to finish of such language as "artistic excellence", "work that reflects artistic innovation, cultural depth, and strong audience engagement", "work transcends borders and connects diverse audiences through creativity, originality, and performance excellence", etc etc; clearly an advertisement.
  • Four links to pages that don't even mention Kross. (I searched those websites, in case the relevant material was on other pages on the site, but found nothing.)
  • A page on a download site listing his works.
  • Yet another unambiguous advertisement, this time on blogspot.
  • Another copy of one of the references already mentioned.
  • A page on a site for which the "about" page says "Here, anyone can share knowledge and wisdom with the world", and invites readers to "write your story". Also, it's just a few sentences, not substantial coverage.
  • A blogging site, on which a search for "Kross" finds nothing.
  • A LinkedIn page.
  • A PR publishing site (PRLog, which describes itself as "Press Release Distribution").
  • A download site. JBW (talk) 18:26, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Music. JBW (talk) 18:26, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply


The Marsh Ladies Choir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I came upon this after seeing a COI edit request (and then seeing some COI edits which I reverted). I don't think this choir passes WP:NORG. The only fairly scant coverage I've found is of the hyper-local variety (see the article history for a little of it, added by the COI account). –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 14:46, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply

Webmaster4MLC (talk) 19:51, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
My contribution has been removed on the assumption  it had been generated using AI.
I have spent many hours pulling this together and I confirm that I wrote it myself.
My response contains relevant evidence to the deletion request.
Please can you reconsider my original response for inclusion in this process. Webmaster4MLC (talk) 22:27, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
The 1985 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability tagged for 5 years with no sign of improvement. No evidence of WP:SIGCOV. Delete. 162 etc. (talk) 21:47, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Ryszard Warot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Akcent (Polish band). In its current state the article is based on one dead source, and one unreliable source (Discogs).

After doing a WP:BEFORE I can see sparse mentions of the subject on various Polish outlets with ranging reliability but nothing that leads me to believe WP:NMUSICIAN is satisfied.

Going via XFD instead of PROD as I am not a Polish speaker so reviewing all available sources isn't easy. sksatsuma 14:20, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Yaryna Tsarynska (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NMUSICBIO. Sources are orchestra personnel lists, employer pages, event listings, or social media. No significant independent coverage. Also, WP:NOTINHERITED. - The9Man Talk 13:45, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Koolade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This musician does not seem notable. There was a passing mention in a book about his name being said in an advertisement (no other info provided), and perhaps one article on him. Crotian Wikipedia doesn't show much useful information either. He does have an article in Musika.hr and Express and a Q&A, but I'm not sure that this can reach the level of significant coverage that we need. It isn't a whole lot to work with, and doesn't offer much critical commentary on his work. There is allegedly a review of him done by some guy (according to one of the sources) but it isn't used here nor can I find it.

I also suspect that users connected with the subject have been editing the article over the years, based on some promotional language and the edit history. AaronNealLucas (talk) 04:34, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply


J.Trill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Complete failure of WP:GNG, much less WP:NMG. There is almost nothing but streaming services and this article on Google. The page currently functions as an entirely self-promotional effort, which barely cites and when it does, it is either from user "jtrilltv" (hardly independent journalism) or a radio station write up of an interview, which reads like the subject wrote it himself (including typos and all). Clear delete fodder. ThaesOfereode (talk) 23:44, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Flame of Life (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBAND Kqol • talk 23:41, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Jet Le Parti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. Citations are directories (AskArt, EDMTrain), promotional outlets and passing mentions. Kqol • talk 23:32, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply

  • Keep the nominating user is correct that the article has or had issues regarding WP:PROMO but neither of the issues mentioned merit a deletion, as AFD is not a cleanup WP:NOTCLEANUP. Could these be improved? Big yes. Additionally these three outlets, kaltblut Magazine, Office Magazine, and Flaunt Magazine covered him in depth, shows a pass of WP:GNG
Lincolnkiptoo26 (talk) 06:09, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Keep, though several sources in article are directories, primary and paid for sources, there are multiple reliable sources to meet WP:NBASIC criteria which says:

“People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability”.

Are all sources in article primary and trivial? No, multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources have discussed the subject and their works in-depth in some WP:RS recognised sources including:

1. This by the 34th Street Magazine dedicated to arts reporting with the title “Meet Jet Le Parti, The Self–Taught Artist Who Turned his Apartment into a Studio Artist Spotlight | Jet combines the philosophy of art with the art of philosophy.” The article has a clearly stated byline (writer’s name) and it is published under the publication’s Art Section. 34th Street Magazine is a weekly arts and entertainment magazine by The Daily Pennsylvanian, the student newspaper of the University of Pennsylvania with a clear editorial independence.

2.This by The Village Voice which is on the list of WP RS with the title “Jet Le Parti and the Poetry of the Impossible Middle Ground”. The piece clearly displays the writers name with an in-depth discussion of the subject and his work. The Village Voice is an American news and culture publication based in Greenwich Village, New York City, known for being the country's first alternative newsweekly.


3.This by Blast entertainment with the “Indie Film Breaks The System With ‘Underground’ Launch” provided an a signifcant coverage of the subject and works and the piece is written by the publications staff writter.

4.This by Whitehot Magazine, a publication dedicated to witting about art.

5.This by Billboard Japan, a is a sister organization of the U.S.-based music magazine Billboard

His EP album is on Apple music which is a WP recognised reliable music source widely cited for music here. Runmastery (talk) 10:31, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Cole Williams (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted in 2021 and recreated. Sources are local New Orleans outlets, his own website and YouTube. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. Kqol • talk 23:12, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Suburban Kids with Biblical Names (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band, very little WP:SIGCOV if any Cubnorth (talk) 22:53, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply

  • Delete. A lot of very good bands are not notable enough for Wikipedia. It's always a little painful to delete their articles, but rules are rules. Suburban Kids with Biblical Names doesn't meet the threshold for inclusion. Trumpetrep (talk) 22:57, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Les Percussions de Strasbourg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BAND. Go D. Usopp (talk) 13:49, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Act of Congress (music group) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't pass WP:NBAND or WP:GNG; only one source meets WP:42, while the rest are trivial mentions, concert announcements, or based on interviews. This includes sources offered by a band member on the talk page. CCM Magazine publishes articles for payment and doesn't appear to publicly disclose which are paid articles. Meadowlark (talk) 00:49, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply

It appears I got CCM confused with another source (LTTM), and I was wrong about that statement. I've struck it, with apologies. Thanks for pointing that out! Meadowlark (talk) 18:07, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Nick Vernier Band (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find many reliable or independent sources on this band. Most sources are YouTube video links. I get a strong sense of self-promotion from this article. PuzzleMuch (talk) 17:53, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply

I want to add these pages as well:
Eric Van Den Brink (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - Same problems as Nick Vernier Band. There are also some citations to older books that are probably misleading. I have read the Monkees book that is referenced in this article and Brink is not mentioned in it at all.
Nick Vernier Band Sessions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - I can't find many reliable/independent sources on this album. I cleaned this article up a bit a few months ago. The 1978 "Golden Discs" book is referenced in this (and the Brink page), but makes no sense here because the album was made in 2010.
PuzzleMuch (talk) 18:01, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply
@Noisychamps, Martha 1968, Calif Vibes, Derek R Bullamore, Grimaud Fille, Shiranakatta, Sunbeams Soils, Encyclinfo, and Rlink2: Notifying contributors to the articles nominated for deletion. If you'd like to comment, feel free. PuzzleMuch (talk) 18:14, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Arijana Gigliani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any independent sources where Gigliani is the main subject. She appears to have had a relatively minor career. The article also is full of errors. For example the cited source for the Macbeth production lists Maribel Ortega not Gigliani as the lead part of Lady Macbeth in Macbeth. Gigliani is listed as "Lady" which would be the tiny role of the lady-in-waiting to Lady Macbeth who doesn't have any arias or much to do. The Berta role checks out but it is cited to a press release for an upcoming performance, and is not a review. It also is not an impressive part. I couldn't fine anything verifying the competition wins, or her work as a teacher. If it helps locate sources, this is a self-written bio: https://vokalnarapsodija.telok.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ARIJANA-GIGLIANI-PHILIPP-cv-hr-i-eng-SRPSKI-PREVOD.pdf Opera base shows she hasn't performed in any staged operas since 2015, and records only a career total of 23 opera performances (not 23 productions; 23 performances in a small number of productions) collectively. There are many European singers who give an average of 40 to 50 performances a year; so to have a career total of 23 performances across an entire career says something. Without any critical reviews with in-depth commentary or an artist profile in an independent publication or some sort of secondary or tertiary referencing, I don't think this passes WP:MUSICBIO, WP:GNG, or WP:BASIC.4meter4 (talk) 15:36, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Rubén Deicas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm very sure that this fails WP:NSINGER. Deicas had not made at least two notable albums, which convinces me that not only does it meet GNG. By the way, the eswiki article on this also shows that Deicas has not published a single album, but their Spotify profile shows that he has made 2 albums... which are yet to be notable to appear here. — SimpleObjects-9ei 🍂/🌰/🤗 (see talk) 01:39, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 05:16, 4 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Steph Fraser (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:MUSICBIO. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:09, 26 September 2026 (UTC)reply

As of this post, I had not responded to the recent COI-informed post on the article's talk page, but the post shows that Fraser has received no shortage of notable coverage as a musician. Once many of those sources on the talk page - not all of them, however - and their respective information is introduced into the article, then it will certainly be in better shape. Examples of good sources presently on the talk page include Northern Exposure Magazine, RTL Today, and Rolling Stone Germany.
I would absolutely give my benefit of the doubt to expanding and updating this article instead of removing it altogether. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 00:26, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:09, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Stephen W Tayler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. scope_creepTalk 04:33, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 07:24, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Keep. Behind-the-scenes figures can be notable, and Tayler has a full-length 1993 interview feature in Recording Musician, substantial discussion of his methods in a 1986 Sound on Sound piece and a recent long-form trade Q&A, alongside a mixing discography taking in Kate Bush, Rush and Tina Turner. That is enough for WP:BASIC. Onatic (talk) 22:46, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply
@Onatic: Interviews dont prove notabillty. That is cardinal rule on Wikipedia. A trade Q & A is a form of interview as well. Do you have a link for the sound on sound piece. scope_creepTalk 10:13, 2 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Comment That may be so - however if the interview is in a reliable source with bylined curation then the bylined text can contribute to notability per WP:INTERVIEW. In this case, there are three good sources which need assessment whether sufficient independent text exists to build an article: , , and . Note - I have added these citations to the article. ResonantDistortion 14:00, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply
Kathy Coleman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to Land of the Lost (1974 TV series), for only where this former child actress is notable. Found Fox News articles about her, whose reliability is questionable (WP:FOXNEWS). Outside primary sources, like her herself, I dunno any reliable source that could've verified her general notability. This one verifies probably her notability as a child actress of that TV series. George Ho (talk) 01:48, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 03:21, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Fernando Lima (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only source is to a track list of his one album. No evidence that WP:GNG and WP:BASIC are met.4meter4 (talk) 02:42, 23 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Sure. A redirect to the album would be fine.4meter4 (talk) 21:39, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:47, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Thomas Juth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Audio engineer with no significant independent coverage. The sources are a Genius lyrics page, a fan blog, a gear-shop Q&A, an interview from his own school (SAE). A shared engineer credit on a Latin Grammy-winning record isn't significant coverage, and nothing meets WP:BASIC. The article was edited by a blocked undisclosed paid editor whom, per the talk page, the subject hired. SOFILUIZA // COMMS 16:29, 21 September 2026 (UTC)reply

  • Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, Music, and Sweden. SOFILUIZA // COMMS 16:29, 21 September 2026 (UTC)reply
    COI disclosure: I am Thomas Juth, the subject of this article, and RibbleDox is my account.
    I would like to clarify two points in the nomination.
    First, the nomination refers to a 2020 talk-page comment signed “Juth” as evidence that I hired a paid editor. I have looked at that comment and I did not write it. It was posted anonymously from an IP address rather than from an account belonging to me. I do not know who posted it or why they signed it that way, so I do not want to speculate, but I do not think it should be treated as a statement from me.
    Second, the nomination describes my Latin Grammy history as “a shared engineer credit on a Latin Grammy-winning record.” For clarity, the official Latin Recording Academy database lists Thomas Juth individually with three Latin Grammy wins and three nominations, including an engineer/mixer credit on the 2012 Record of the Year winner “¡Corre!”. I understand that awards and professional credits do not by themselves replace the need for significant independent coverage, but I think the distinction is relevant when considering WP:BIO.
    I am also looking for older independent interviews, profiles and other reliable coverage that may not currently be included in the article. Since I am the subject, I will leave the assessment of the sources and the article’s notability to uninvolved editors. Ribbledox (talk) 17:28, 21 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Keep according to WP:ANYBIO - Latin Grammy website credits him with three Latin Grammies, and a latin grammy is an ANYBIO-level award. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 22:42, 21 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:09, 29 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Emani 22 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A stub page about a deceased musician that lacks WP:GNG, WP:MUSICBIO and WP:REFERENCE, which makes it vulnerable for an AFD. Darrion N. Brown 🙂 (my talk page / my sandbox) 17:55, 20 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 08:42, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Keep per WP:NMUSIC - Fire Starter, a song which she was a featured artist on, charted on Billboard Bubbling Under. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 22:52, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Redirect to A Love Letter to You 3 - unbalanced ratio of words and citations. SH360! (Must edit! Must report!) 11:02, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply
I don't think having an "unbalanced ratio of words and citations" is an actual explanation for why you're voting for a redirect. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 14:39, 28 September 2026 (UTC)reply


AK 47 Mayanja (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Subject does not meet WP:MUSICBIO and WP:V. Considered stubifying to avoid WP:Systemic bias, but RS don't seem to exist. Page was speedied and prodded as AK 47 (Musician), but was recreated the following day with this title. In solidarity, Miniapolis 17:30, 19 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 15:28, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply


Johanna Cranitch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Musician seemingly notable only for a few years' association with The Cranberries. Sources here are primary source Q&A interviews (, , ), a page on a Cranberries fan blog, brief trivial mentions (, , , , ) and sources that don't mention her (, ). I found one review for an EP issued under the name White Prism and one review for a full length album issued under that name, but neither is enough coverage for either or both to be notable under WP:NMUSIC, and thus I don't see a pass for Cranitch under WP:NMUSICIAN or, per the source analysis above, a WP:GNG pass. OK with a redirect to the Cranberries page, where she is mentioned and for which she seems best known. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:21, 19 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 18:11, 26 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:56, 4 October 2026 (UTC)reply


James Collins (songwriter) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete this page as this page don't meet WP:GNG or WP:SINGER The article is ugly and only sourced blocked source in my country (Brazil), IMDB and YouTube. Independent, reliable and secondary source is required for this page still existing, per WP:V VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 23:42, 18 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:26, 26 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:13, 3 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Champz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tried to quick delete and add undisclosed paid tag, both were removed. The subject of this article does not appear to pass GNG. No valid secondary sourcing, no WP:RS, and WP:NEWSORGNIGERIA. Sources are promotional, some appear AI-generated, and some are interviews. They also all talk about him being the son of a notable artist, but as we know, notability is not WP:INHERITED. This also appears to be WP:SYO from the new contributor who wrote this article. Courtesy ping to User:Reconrabbit who seemed to believe this article passes GNG and User:Quebecguy who didn't like my patrolling of this page. Also worth noting that the same contributor who wrote this article also recently wrote Khamari, which I have also nominated for deletion for essentially the same sourcing issues TitCrisse (t•c) 12:45, 18 September 2026 (UTC).reply

  • Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Nigeria. TitCrisse (t•c) 10:51, 18 September 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Comment: Can you make a source assessment? Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 12:06, 18 September 2026 (UTC)reply
    Hi ReadingBeans. I'm not really good at them and forgot how, but I can look into it if you think it's really necessary. Seems like blogs, interviews, puff pieces, and some AI-generated to me. Regards, TitCrisse (t•c) 12:42, 18 September 2026 (UTC).reply
    Please, make a source assessment. We could find atleast three sources that could meet GNG (or, least WP:CREATIVE). Most sources are flowery (I guess because he is Wizkid’s son), so, I know that there must be something. BBC said he’s been on the limelight since 2011, so, you understand my point, yes?
    For PROMO, that’s a clean up issue, we all know that deletion is not cleanup. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 14:43, 18 September 2026 (UTC)reply
    Hi ReadingBeans, OK, I will look into making one later today. The BBC PIDGIN article you're referencing has no byline. It's more than just PROMO in my opinion, it appears to be a conceited paid effort to get him a Wiki page, in line with Brown envelope journalism. And the supposed new user who wrote it who has no connection to the subject but can cite Wiki policies and wikicode quite well. All seems fishy to me. Regards, TitCrisse (t•c) 14:52, 18 September 2026 (UTC).reply
    BBC Pidgin does not engage in brown envelope journalism. Why would you think that? Because it’s written in Pidgin? Most BBC articles I’ve read have no byline; see this example here and I barely read the BBC. Please, make the source assessment. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 15:02, 18 September 2026 (UTC)reply
    Hi ReadingBeans. I said that the BBC Pidgin article has no byline. All the BBC articles that I read do have bylines. The whole context of the article, its sources, its creator and their behaviour, leads me to believe that this is brown envelope journalism. No, I do not need to make a source assessment table. Feel free to make one yourself. Thank you, regards, TitCrisse (t•c) 16:46, 18 September 2026 (UTC).reply
    BBC Pidgin is known to never do that, like every other aspect of the BBC. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 13:55, 19 September 2026 (UTC)reply
    TitCrisse have been attacking me too much. I don't have right to attack him back. It is the will of all of you to decide. Ragnarok49 (talk) 17:49, 18 September 2026 (UTC)reply
    You're the one who is making it personal and attacking, and your comments in this discussion complaining about him are extremely inappropriate. I recommend you take it down a couple of notches, lest you end up at ANI. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:59, 19 September 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Comment The promotional tone of most of the sources makes it hard to assess, but his debut EP was on the Nigerian national top 100 from Nov 7 2025 to Dec 4 2025. I declined the G11 as not so obviously promotional it warranted speedy deletion - not necessarily that it met GNG. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 13:36, 18 September 2026 (UTC)reply
    Hi Reconrabbit. Thank you for your comment, but you literally said "...the article content isn't bad and the subject (surprisingly) meets GNG" here: diff 1, so I'm having a hard time understanding you now. Regards, --TitCrisse (t•c) 14:31, 18 September 2026 (UTC).reply
    For the fact he is Wizkid's son, Wizkid will surely be cited in the article. So, if you think they are promotional, y'all can access it well Ragnarok49 (talk) 18:01, 18 September 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Comment: Just because I joined Wikipedia not long ago doesn't mean I won't study it. Even before I created the account, I have been studying it for over months. And I have learnt many things all the way. But as for TitCrisse, he assumed I am paid to edit it I am too professional. But, everyone ain't the same. Trying to delete articles that are notable like Khamari, holding Billboard chart, AllMusic biography. I just feel I should contribute since no one was willing to create the article. So, I had to. But TitCrisse is making things uncomfortable for me on Wikipedia and I don't like it. Ragnarok49 of Thor 9:37, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is a clear case of WP:TOOSOON. The subject is still an up-and-coming artist who is primarily known for being the son of Wizkid. His music career has not picked up yet, and the two EPs he has released are not notable in my opinion. Champions Arrival is the only EP that was critically reviewed, but the two sources that reviewed it are not notable.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 13:41, 19 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Keep Automatically notable due to charting on the Nigerian national charts under WP:NMUSIC. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 13:54, 19 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:58, 27 September 2026 (UTC)reply
FyaVerse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Soft-deleted at AfD in October 2025 and recreated without new independent coverage. Still fails GNG. Kqol • talk 21:37, 16 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Delete per past AfD, nor so he does meet WP:NMUSIC. — SimpleObjects-9ei 🍂/🌰/🤗 (see talk) 21:41, 16 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Keep - he charted as an independently named artist on the Billboard Argentina chart, which is the national music chart of Argentina - that's sufficient to pass WP:NMUSIC C2. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 14:22, 17 September 2026 (UTC)reply
@Jishara, the chart claim comes from a Surinamese report about producer ChevoBeatz's song, naming the vocalist "FireVerse", and the Gleaner calls it a track he recorded for ChevoBeatz. That's a guest vocal on a producer's single, not his own charting under WP:NMUSIC C2. Kqol • talk 21:33, 18 September 2026 (UTC)reply
ChevoBeatz is only the producer of the instrumental, in modern dancehall every producer started to credit their name as artist and not just in the label section, FyaVerse is the lead Vocalist of the track and not a guest Vocalist on the producer track Jeradishere (talk) 13:36, 19 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 15:33, 24 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh (talk 🎮 sign) 17:59, 1 October 2026 (UTC)reply


Al Menne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP with no secondary. No indication of significance. Refs are routine annoucements and interviews. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 18:34, 7 September 2026 (UTC)reply

  • Keep. Freak Accident was reviewed at length by Paste and again by Post-Trash, and Them ran a substantial feature on Menne in April 2025 about his first year after coming out and the touring around it. Those are secondary sources written about him, not the announcement items the nomination describes. The article itself is weak,but that is a matter of someone spending 20 minutes on it.Saltshaker96 (talk) 20:41, 7 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Them is a interview for the band, not him. Freak Accident is an album. It may be notable but its not him. If you have WP:THREE WP:SECONDARY sources to prove the man is notable. scope_creepTalk 21:01, 7 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Dratify. I couldn't find WP:SIGCOV, but Saltshaker96 or other users are free to work on a draft using secondary sources they can find. The Them feature[1] is a interview that doesn't help establish WP:SIGCOV. Lovelano (talk) 21:19, 7 September 2026 (UTC) Lovelano (talk) 21:19, 7 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Keep - the Them feature, even when striking the entire interview part, has a very lengthy intro that provides SIGCOV. We've also got Paste Magazine's full profile and some sources on his own independent solo career Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 21:27, 7 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Looks like you included the wrong Paste Magazine link, the correct link is . Andise1 (talk) 16:02, 8 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the fix, I honestly have no idea how that happened. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 15:42, 10 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Looks like Paste Magazine is a website that changes the URL address shown in your browser as you infinitely scroll through their articles, the idea being that the current URL bar will take you back to whatever you're currently looking at. This almost never works well, though, and websites should stop doing it; you probably scrolled too far down in the article. Cheers, Suriname0 (talk) 23:03, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

References

  1. ↑ "How Great Grandpa's Al Menne Sang His Way Through Year One of Testosterone | Them". www.them.us.
I can't see his name mentioned in the first reference. The second is a routine annoucemnent of a single release, its not in-depth nor significant coverage, the third one looks like an interview typical of the non-coverage already in the article and the fouth is an album review, meaning the album is notable. He's not. It is a WP:BLP and it needs real WP:SECONDARY references to prove he has standalone notabilty independent from the band. Its worth noting for the 14,000,000th time that interviews don't count toward notability. They are WP:SPS sources. scope_creepTalk 06:55, 8 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 07:52, 15 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 15:46, 22 September 2026 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus yet. Let's see if a third relist brings in some additional perspectives.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:41, 30 September 2026 (UTC)reply

Bands and musicians Templates for deletion

[edit]

Categories

[edit]

Comment on the talk pages of the articles, not here.

References

[edit]