Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

(Redirected from Wikipedia:PERM)

    Requests for permissions

    This page enables administrators to handle requests for permissions on the English Wikipedia. Administrators are able to modify account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, extended confirmed, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback, and template editor rights, and AutoWikiBrowser access.

    Editors wishing to request a permission flag here should do so following the procedure below. Editors requesting permissions are advised to periodically revisit the requests page, as notifications will not always be given after a decision is made. Editors should not expect their request to be answered right away and should remember to be patient when filing a request. To find out what permissions your account has, go to Special:Preferences, where your permissions are listed in the user profile tab under "Member of groups".

    Requests for permissions are archived regularly; please see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Archive for an index of past requests.

    Bot report: No errors! Report generated at 22:20, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

    Permissions

    Handled here

    • Account creator (add request · view requests): The account creator flag is granted to users who are active in the request an account process. The flag removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24 hour period. It also allows users to make accounts with names similar to other accounts. The account creator flag is only given to users who participate in the ACC process and may be removed without notice should a user's participation in the account creation process cease.
    • Autopatrolled (add request · view requests): The autopatrolled flag is granted to users who are active in the creation of new articles. This tool is granted so their creations are auto patrolled in Special:NewPages. Unlike other requests, any user may nominate an editor for Autopatrolled, even without that user's consent. A user who wishes to have this flag generally should have created at least 25 articles and must be trusted, experienced, and must have demonstrated they are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially WP:BLP and Wikipedia:Notability.
    • AutoWikiBrowser (add request · view requests): AutoWikiBrowser is a semi-automated MediaWiki editor for Windows, designed to make tedious repetitive tasks quicker and easier. It is essentially a browser that automatically opens up a new page when the last is saved. When set to do so, it suggests some changes (typically formatting) that are generally meant to be incidental to the main change. Please read the rules of use and registration requirements on the main page before requesting permission. This is not a true user right, but access needs to be granted by administrators just like other permissions. If approved, your name will be added to the CheckPage. Users with under 250 non-automated mainspace edits or 500 total mainspace edits are rarely approved. You will need to give a reason for wanting AWB access.
    • Confirmed (add request · view requests): The confirmed flag may be granted to new users who have not yet hit the threshold for autoconfirmed status. These are users who have not had both 10 edits and 4 days experience. People with this flag can upload files and edit semi-protected pages before hitting the autoconfirmed flag. Users requesting this flag must indicate clearly why they should be exempted from the customary confirmation period.
    • Event coordinator (add request · view requests): The event coordinator user right allows editors to create multiple new accounts, and to temporarily confirm accounts so that they can create new articles.
    • Extended confirmed (add request · view requests): The extended confirmed flag is normally automatically added to accounts after 500 edits and 30 days, but may be added to legitimate alternate accounts of users that already have this access. The flag allows users to edit pages under extended confirmed protection.
    • File mover (add request · view requests): The file mover user right is intended to allow users experienced in working with files to rename them, subject to policy, with the ease that autoconfirmed users already enjoy when renaming Wikipedia articles.
    • Mass message sender (add request · view requests): Mass message sender enables users to send messages to multiple users at once. This flag is given to users who have made requests for delivery in the past, clearly showing an understanding of the guidance for use.
    • New page reviewer (add request · view requests): The new page reviewer user right allows users to mark pages as patrolled and use the page curation toolbar. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Page mover (add request · view requests): The page mover user right allows users experienced in working with article names to move them, subject to policy, without leaving behind a redirect. They may also move all subpages when moving the parent page(s). General guidelines include making 3,000 edits and 6 months of editing history. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Pending changes reviewer (add request · view requests): The reviewer flag is granted to users who are experienced enough with Wikipedia editing and its policies for contributing to the process of reviewing articles placed under pending changes.
    • Rollback (add request · view requests): Rollback enables users to remove vandalism much more quickly and efficiently than by undoing it. Users who do not demonstrate an understanding of what constitutes capable vandalism fighting, either because they have no or little history of doing so, or show a poor ability to discern between good and bad faith edits will not be granted this right. Also, it is unlikely that editors with under 200 mainspace edits will have their request granted. For a more detailed explanation of rollback and information about when it is appropriate to use the tool, see Wikipedia:Rollback. For information about the technical details of the feature, see here.
    • Template editor (add request · view requests): The template editor flag allows users to edit protected templates and Lua modules. General guidelines for granting include making at least 1,000 edits overall (with at least 150 to templates or modules), being a registered user for over a year, and having a record of successfully proposing significant edits to several protected templates. Users should demonstrate proficiency with template syntax and an understanding of the need for caution when editing heavily-used templates.
    • Temporary account IP viewer (add request · view requests): Temporary account IP viewers are able to view the IP address information associated with temporary accounts.

    Handled elsewhere

    Several permissions are requested and handled elsewhere:

    Review and removal of permissions

    The requests for permissions process is not used to review or remove user rights:

    The bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight permissions are removed at meta:Steward requests/Permissions. Stewards will typically not carry out such requests unless they are made on behalf of the Arbitration Committee, by a user who is requesting their own access be removed, or in cases of an emergency.

    Process

    Requestors

    To make a request for a permission, click "add request" next to the appropriate header and fill in the reason for wanting the permission.

    Administrators

    Administrators are permitted to grant account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, event coordinator, file mover, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback and template editor flags to any user who meets the criteria explained above and can be trusted not to abuse the tool(s). Administrators may either grant these permissions permanently or temporarily. For convenience, a bot will automatically comment with relevant data if the user does not meet configurable qualifications. Even if the bot does not comment, administrators should review the user's contributions and logs to ensure the tools will be used appropriately and check for any indication of potential misuse.

    Once an administrator has granted a permission or decided to deny a request, they should add {{done}} or {{not done}} respectively under the request with their comments. If a user already has the requested permission, or is autoconfirmed and requesting confirmed, {{already done}} should be used. N hours after the last comment was made (as specified by the config), the request will be archived automatically: approved requests will be placed here; declined requests will go here. See User:MusikBot/PermClerk#Archiving for more information on archiving functionality.

    Other editors

    Requests for permissions is primarily intended for editors requesting a permission for their own account. Other editors are welcome to comment if they have specific information that is relevant to that request that a patrolling administrator is unlikely to discover for themselves. Otherwise, since only administrators can effectively respond to these requests, general comments or 'clerking' by other users are rarely helpful. Non-administrators cannot "decline" to grant a request, because they're not in a position to accept it.

    A limited exception to this is Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled, where third party nominations are encouraged. Other editors should still avoid offering general remarks on requests and leave the final decision to an administrator.

    Current requests

    Account creator


    Autopatrolled

    I have created 25 articles; most of them are about genetic disorders and less about the genes. I think autopatrolled rights will decrease the backlog. NotCarlJohnson1992 (talk) 17:59, 29 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    (Non-administrator comment) @NotCarlJohnson1992: RXYLT1 and POMK use genomic locations corresponding to their respective subjects in their "Gene" sections, but mistakenly identify the gene as CRPPA. RXYLT1 should identify RXYLT1 at 12q14.2, unless I am tripping, while POMK should identify POMK at 8p11.21; CRPPA is a different gene located at 7p21.2, that is a substantive copying error, not just merely a stylistic matter. All three articles also appear to repeat "from base pair from base pair"; POMK contains "is a enzyme" and "mucular dystrophy"; and another editor has already had to remove other duplicated wording and add the missing reference lists. The same duplicated base-pair wording is still in your older creations like POLR3A, POGLUT1, POMGNT2 and DARS2, so this is not something that is confined to one article. Your more substantial new article Ataxia with oculomotor apraxia type 1 also has a handful of visible spelling and grammatical errors. So, since autopatrolled would cause future creations to bypass precisely this manual check, I would wait until these issues have been corrected and a further run of clean, independently and carefully reviewed creations demonstrates more consistent proofreading. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:26, 29 July 2026 (UTC)reply
    Okay, thanks! NotCarlJohnson1992 (talk) 22:04, 29 July 2026 (UTC)reply
    icon Request withdrawn NotCarlJohnson1992 (talk) 22:13, 29 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    I have written 129 articles; writing articles at a pace of close to 1 or 2 a day for a while. I am going to attempt to continue that pace, and I don't want to inconvenience NPP reviewers. Mikeycdiamond (talk) 01:42, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply

     Done. I have some feedback, which I'll leave on your talk page. TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 02:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    I have created 35+ articles and intend to continue creating more. I believe my article creation history demonstrates familiarity with Wikipedia's content and sourcing policies, and so I am requesting the autopatrolled right to help reduce workload for New Pages Patrol.LivingLife1976 (talk) 11:25, 1 August 2026 (UTC) LivingLife1976 (talk) 11:25, 1 August 2026 (UTC)reply


    AutoWikiBrowser

    Would like to use when I get my computer back, will use to do edits that if done manually would be tedious. Beta Beta Beta - talk 22:06, 6 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    Beta Beta Beta, can you give us any more specific examples? In solidarity, asilvering (talk) 22:19, 16 July 2026 (UTC)reply
    To provide one example, simple copy editing would be far easier with AWB than having to look through the page for the possibility of a slip-up. Beta Beta Beta - talk 22:39, 16 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    I would like to create navigation templates for groups of related articles that currently lack them and use AWB to add those templates where appropriate. I have not created navigation templates before, but I am familiar with Wikipedia’s policies and would take care to review my work and ensure edits are appropriate. I understand if more experience with this type of maintenance work is needed before being granted the permission. If granted, I would use AWB carefully and review each edit before saving. Mascius (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    Hi there, I would like to use AWB to help speed up edits replacing the deprecated |alma_mater= parameter from some infoboxes. Here are some examples of the type of edit I have made manualy, [1][2][3][4], and here is an example of another user who has used AWB to make these types of edits [5] HaphazardBinBag (talk) 21:26, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply



    Confirmed


    Event coordinator


    Extended confirmed


    File mover


    Mass message sender



    New page reviewer

    Experience with WP:GAN reviewing, and recent changes patrolling. Furthermore, I am a experienced editer, making and nominating a WP:GAN article (61016), I have also have been on this platform for about a year and understanding of key rules in Wikipedia, such as WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:DICT, WP:NPOV, and WP:CRYSTALBALL. I have also made this to help with the huge backlog, and review as much articles as possible on Wikipedia. Wikiediter2029 (talk) Nosey? Stalk My edits 15:10, 20 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 15:20, 20 July 2026 (UTC)reply
     Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 15:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights... volunteer my time to help with the backlog. CipherSleuth (talk) 21:10, 26 July 2026 (UTC)reply

     Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 15:04, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    Hi. I would like to become a New Page Reviewer to help improve the project and to assist my work at WP:WPAFC. I participate in the AfC process lots, and am familiar with the deletion policies and different processes. I have also written one article, and may complete another draft soon, although article creation is something I don't do very often. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 00:22, 29 July 2026 (UTC)reply

     Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 15:05, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    Hi! I'd like to request the New Page Reviewer user right to help reduce the backlog. I have experience with page creations, having created or converted from redirect 122 pages. I've also promoted two articles to WP:GAs, and am frequently active in DYK, in AfD and in GANRs. Jishara (talk) 12:23, 29 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    Hello there. I would like to request the New Page Reviewer permission. I am an extended confirmed editor with over 1,900 global edits (1,400+ on enwiki) and have authored 34 mainspace articles. I’ve been an active member of the wiki for over 11 years. While I may not be super active, I feel energized to contribute when I have the time to edit and help improve the articles. Through my writing and sourcing experience in film, biography, and regional topics, I believe I am well-versed in core policies like WP:N, WP:V, and WP:BLP. I look forward to helping clear the backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed and assisting new contributors. If I don’t get permission to be a new page reviewer, it’s still fine! Thank you for your time. UzbukUdash (talk) 08:28, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply

     Done for 1 month after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 15:32, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    I previously held the temporary New Page Reviewer permissions for one month, which has now expired. During this time, I used the Page Curation tool to review articles and drafts according to Wikipedia's policies. Since my temporary right has expired, I would like to request full restoration of my permission,so that I may continue to help the community with the backlog. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 16:37, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days ([6]). MusikBot talk 16:40, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    I'd like NPR. I'm extended confirmed and spend time at AfD checking sources and notability. Happy to help with the NPP backlog. EmilyR34 (talk) 03:18, 1 August 2026 (UTC)reply

    Automated comment This user has 488 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 03:20, 1 August 2026 (UTC)reply


    Page mover



    Pending changes reviewer

    Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I patrol recently edited and see edits which I cannot accept which is a little annoying. I would also like to help more around wikipedia due to how much information I have found useful inside it. I like countering vandalism of pages as well. For all these reasons, I'd love the permission.

    Thanks for your time. Equivalent-Text2598 (talk) 15:40, 23 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    Automated comment This user has 95 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 15:50, 23 July 2026 (UTC)reply
    I now have 173 edits in the mainspace. Equivalent-Text2598 (talk) 14:52, 26 July 2026 (UTC)reply
     Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 02:55, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    I am requesting the pending changes reviewer permission to assist with maintaining the quality of articles on English Wikipedia. My contributions have primarily focused on expanding and improving articles by adding reliable, independent sources, improving references, and organizing content in accordance with Wikipedia's content policies. 0ximjub43r (talk) 22:12, 27 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I am knowledgeable in Wikipedia's policies and I would like to assist. A.FLOCK (talk) 00:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply

     Done — rsjaffe 🗣️ 00:15, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    I am familiar with Wikipedia and its guidelines; occasionally come across pending changes I'd like to review. MSWS (talk) 03:18, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights I would like to be able to review edits that are on pending changes pages, as well as unprotected pages. I have 900 edits now, which a good number of them are anti-vandal edits. I also feel that I have a good knowledge on Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I feel I could use that knowledge on pending changes pages as well as unprotected pages. MathMan4 (talk) 06:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    I would like to review pending changes encountered during recent edits patrol. I am familiar with Wikipedia's content policies. Mascius (talk) 18:28, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    In my recent changes patrols, I semi-frequently come across pending changes. If the changes are vandalism, I revert them, but I would also like the ability to accept good pending changes while I'm at it. I already have rollback, extended confirmed, and over 1.6k edits. I also have read and am familiar with the relevant policies. FlammablePizza (talk) 21:20, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply



    Rollback

    I would like to request Rollback rights. My last request was on 18 May. According to previous advice, I have tried to follow a clear workflow, including issuing warnings and reporting Vandalism, Block evasion, and Disruptive editing at AIV, RFPP, and AN/EW. In addition, I use Twinkle for warnings, reports, and reverts. AriuCH (talk) 18:27, 2 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days ([7][8]). MusikBot talk 18:30, 2 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    I've recently been using SWViewer and Twinkle to revert vandalism, so this permission would be very useful for me. I'm already very familiar with how it works, as I already have this permission on other Wikimedia projects. -- 🐦‍🔥 Aws 💬 Talk 14:23, 12 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    I would like to request Rollback permissions firstly in order to make use of tools like Huggle & AntiVandal. Secondly rollback permissions will allow me to increase the speed of my workflow as most of it consists of RC patrolling edits by unregistered & new accounts. My contribution history demonstrates that I have multiple months of RC Patrol experience and no history of edit warring. At the time of writing this I have 656 live edits of which 220 are in the Main namespace and 262 are in the User Talk namespace, this shows my track record of consistently notifying editors when reverting their edits. Vydrakk (talk) 10:03, 15 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    I would like to request my Rollback rights. My previous request on June 15 was declined because I was blocked for making disruptive edits. Since I'm autoconfirmed, I use Twinkle to revert the edits which was vandalized by the IPs (or later TAs). Thomasfan1916[built buses?] 20:15, 23 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    I am requesting permanent rollback rights after a 1 month trial in the past, as well as my recent 3 month trial. Over the course of the past few months, I have served as a CVUA instructor, and have continued using antivandalism tools like Wikishield and CVPI to prevent vandalism from infecting the wiki. Norellia.sh(talk) 08:29, 26 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by HJ Mitchell (expires 00:00, 31 July 2026 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 08:30, 26 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    I would like to request rollback rights. I check the recent changes page a couple times a day and I use Twinkle currently to revert vandalism. I have over 200 mainspace edits as well as extended-confirmed permissions. I always use warning templates after reverting edits and make reports to AIV when necessary. Rollback would help me look through recent changes much more effectively with tools such as Interceptor or WikiShield. If not permanent, a month-long trial run of rollback would also work, so that I could reapply eventually. Bungle491 (talk) 06:27, 28 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    I have antivandalism experience and I am requesting rollback permissions to be better equipped to fight vandals. My track record shows that I'm good at differentiating between vandalism and good faith edits, and responding accordingly. - Otherwise (Talk?) 02:50, 29 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    Reason for requesting rollback rights I have 900 edits now, which a lot of them are reverting vandalism and ensuring pages follow Wikipedia's quality guidelines. I feel that being able to rollback pages/edits will help me ensure that Wikipedia's quality standards are being met, especially when a user has made multiple poor-quality edits. MathMan4 (talk) 05:57, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    Reason for requesting rollback rights, I mainly edit reality shows and there are constantly fan edits. I have to revert in most cases to stable one but it unfortunately also includes some good edits. Overall, extra hard work. Rollback will definitely help me. :) Tenshi Uisu (talk) 16:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    Been on wp for almost a year now with 5000 edits, already use Twinkle on a regular basis and would be useful when I'm reviewing pages. Fortek67 (talk) 12:13, 31 July 2026 (UTC)reply


    Template editor

    Hi. I am requesting TE rights so I can make edits to template-protected template faster. I have numerous (over 5) template requests, of which I believe around 5 have been accepted, and have made over 3 sandbox edits. My main template edite are those which help readability on Dark Mode while minimally affecting light mode, such as my series of edite to Wdefcon templates ({{Edit COI/backlog}}, {{AfC information}}, etc.). With TE, I would be able to make more of these, alongside others. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 22:49, 14 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    Standard Guidelines review:
    1. Green tickY (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 1.5 year)
    2. Green tickY (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~1100)
    3. Green tickY (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: 170)
    4. Green tickY (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: N/A)
    5. Green tickY (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 6)
    6. Red XN (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 3 (plus 1 pending))
    Primefac (talk) 22:11, 15 July 2026 (UTC)reply
    Having counted again, I believe I have at least 4 accepted, 1 pending, and 2 declined edit requests? Axolitl (talk | contribs) 22:19, 15 July 2026 (UTC)reply
    I also don't know if this matters, but I just had another edit request answered, leaving me at 5 accepted edit requests. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 03:17, 16 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    I recently possessed the template editor right, but it expired on July 1. I would like to request permanent template editor rights. I have met all the criteria for granting. I also am willing to prove I can be responsible again with possessing the template editor right permanently. CharlesEditor23 (talk) 05:13, 24 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    Could you point to a few examples of where you have used the right on high-risk templates in the past few months? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:35, 24 July 2026 (UTC)reply
    Yes. I have used the template editor right on Module:Gridiron color/data & Module:College color/data, which are both high-risk templates. Here's the edit diff from May 22, 2026 from when I previously had the WP:TPE right and used it to change the HTML hex color codes for the Canadian Football League (CFL)'s Hamilton Tiger-Cats. Here's the edit diff from April 29, 2026 from when I previously had the template editor right and used it to change the historical HTML color codes for the National Football League (NFL)'s Dallas Cowboys. Here's the edit diff from March 29, 2026 from when I previously had the template editor right and used it to change the URL source reference for the California Golden Bears. CharlesEditor23 (talk) 03:40, 26 July 2026 (UTC)reply
    Are the examples I've provided sufficient enough? The main reason why I'm requesting WP:TPE right is so I may be able to make changes to high risk templates such as Module:Gridiron color/data & Module:College color/data. I'm happy to answer any & all other questions. CharlesEditor23 (talk) 16:47, 28 July 2026 (UTC)reply
    I will note I haven't had a chance to look at them yet; please be patient. Primefac (talk) 21:53, 28 July 2026 (UTC)reply

    Temporary account IP viewer