Talk:Rok
Add topicLatest comment: 2 months ago by 1isall in topic Requested move 24 May 2026
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | On 24 May 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved from Rok to ROK (disambiguation). The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Saint Rok
[edit]Rok is not a Croatian saint but rather a french saint who went by the name Roch, Rok being the Croatian version of the name. Rokpok (talk) 22:47, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- There is no need to remove him from this page. I have reinstated an entry for him with a link to Saint Roch. Anyone could also create a redirect at Saint Rok but there may be no benefit in that. - Fayenatic (talk) 17:53, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Requested move 24 May 2026
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Clear consensus. Anyone can take ROK to RfD at any time. (closed by non-admin page mover) 1isall (talk | contribs) 17:42, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Rok → ROK (disambiguation) – There is a notable primary topic that the all-caps ROK redirect to South Korea. This should be moved. IShowSammy (discussion | contributions) 14:04, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose redirecting this to Republic of Korea is not primary. It should just be WP:BLAR'd and pointed to Rok plc or that company be moved to the base name. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:57, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose: ROK is primary topic redirect to the country, and Rok is concisely-titled dab page for all the other Roks and ROKs. There is no problem needing a solution. PamD 15:45, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- Comment Note that ROK pointed to the disambiguation page until an undiscussed edit by User:IShowSammy last year. That should probably be reverted and discussed at WP:RFD. 162 etc. (talk) 17:40, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- This previous edit from way back before I signed up showed that this isn't the first time there was a redirect target dispute. IShowSammy (discussion | contributions) 17:46, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- Previous disagreement is an excellent reason to use WP:RFD. 162 etc. (talk) 17:57, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- This previous edit from way back before I signed up showed that this isn't the first time there was a redirect target dispute. IShowSammy (discussion | contributions) 17:46, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose there are other uses like the name that use this case. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:23, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.