Talk:NDTV

The last citadel of secularism is dowm

Nobody taking The wire seriously. ALt news founders hounded and jailed. Ravish Kumar left NDTV and turns YouTuber. NDTV becomes Godi media and relentlessly broadcasting Ram Mandir Pran Pratishtha. NDTV still reliable? BlackOrchidd (talk) 10:13, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

@BlackOrchidd The reliability WP:RS of a publication in the context of Wikipedia is determined at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. You might want to discuss it there. This talk page is to discuss about the content of the article. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 18:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, I am taking this issue to WPRS NB. Plz participate. BlackOrchidd (talk) 06:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

+ NDTV broadcasted Modi's Temple inaugration in Abu Dhabi without break on 14th Feb 2024. Meanwhile the protesting farmers suffered in perils at Shambhu border, NDTV didnt spared a moment of screen time during the temple inaugration. BlackOrchidd (talk) 07:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

+ Finance miniter of BJP ruled government giving interview to NDTV after a long boycott by BJP leaders earlier. BlackOrchidd (talk) 07:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

So? — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 17:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Neutrality in Describing Adani Group's Acquisition and The Economist Citation

Hi everyone, I noticed that the current phrasing describes the Adani Group as 'noted for its affinity with the ruling BJP government' and references The Economist’s statement about the news channel’s editorial shift after the acquisition. To maintain neutrality, would it be better to rephrase this to focus on the factual aspects of the acquisition, with The Economist’s perspective on the editorial change presented as a cited observation rather than implying a specific relationship between Adani and the government? Additionally, should we include the resignations following the takeover as a separate point to ensure clarity? I’d love to hear your thoughts. I.Mahesh (talk) 11:55, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

I agree that the wording challenges neutrality. It shouldn't be deleted entirely, but placing that phrase in the intro paragraphs gives in undue weight. CNN and The Washington Post don't have similar incidents given undue weight in their intro paragraphs. Rshah1010 (talk) 23:05, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

I don't see a problem with mentioning the Adani Group's acquisition and the resulting perceived change in NDTV's political orientation in the lead section. The main problem is that NDTV's history from 1984 to 2021 is sparsely summarised in the lead section. If the lead were expanded to include a proportionate description of NDTV's earlier history, there would not be a due weight issue. — Newslinger talk 01:26, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Rshah1010, the lead is an appropriate summary of section § 2022 onwards: Acquisition by Adani Group. I don't see a problem. — hako9 (talk) 02:33, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Need to add content

NDTV also has radio channel (NDTV 24x7 Radio) that is not mentioned in this article. Can you elaborate about its history and operations 81.106.77.222 (talk) 21:50, 20 August 2025 (UTC)