Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Linn Branch

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Mariamnei in topic Feedback from New Page Review process

This article should not be deleted

[edit]

Here is what I said to the user who notified me it was/should be deleted.

I've never attempted to recreate a deleted page before so I do not know the procedure. Do I start with Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion or Wikipedia:Deletion review?
What I do know is this article certainly does have a reason to exist. For no other reason that it is the receiving stream of a pre-existing article currently up in wikipedia, Roberts Branch (Linn Branch tributary). It would be like having an article for a species but not for a genus, doesn't make much sense.
Furthermore, I've already created a few new articles for the Platte River watershed, and plan to do more. I am mostly updating and overhauling existing articles but creating new ones, such as Little Third Fork Platte River and Wilkerson Creek are going well, so far. This article seems to be penalized arbitrarily for it not being good 4 years ago, all I know is that it can be good now.
Here are some small streams I have previously fleshed out in the Nodaway River watershed that would be illustrative of my goal with this and the other articles: Jenkins Creek (Nodaway River tributary), Highly Creek.
As an aside, I tried in vain to find the previous article to restore it, there seemed to be a source I cannot find (or access) today. The Ramsey Place name files for Clinton County, which the previous article of this name referenced.
Anyway, I understand why this might be happening and I intend to do what is needed to make the case for this article to not be deleted. Frankly, this stream is quite a bit more notable than others in this watershed. SamuelNelsonGISP (talk) 13:11, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Feedback from New Page Review process

[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice work!

Mariamnei (talk) 11:47, 21 October 2025 (UTC)Reply