Talk:Emancipation Pictorial

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 16:27, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

Emancipation Pictorial

• ... that the Emancipation Pictorial (issue pictured), a Chinese women's magazine, opposed women's political participation?

• Source: Wang Cancan (王璨璨) (7 June 2021). 解放画报 [Emancipation Pictorial]. Encyclopaedia of China (in Chinese) (3rd ed.). Retrieved 17 November 2024.{{cite encyclopedia}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link) "因而提倡女权、男女平等、妇女解放等，但是反对女子参政. (Therefore, it advocated for women's rights, gender equality, women's liberation, etc., but opposed women's participation in politics.)"

• • ALT1: ... that most of the contributors to the Emancipation Pictorial (issue pictured), a Chinese women's magazine, were men? Source: 中国妇女报刊史上首份画报 初期男作者投稿居多 [The First Pictorial Magazine in the History of Chinese Women's Newspapers and Periodicals; Most of the Early Contributors were Male]. Shenyang Daily (in Chinese). 8 March 2010. Archived from the original on 30 January 2011. Retrieved 17 November 2024 – via Sohu.com. "自本刊创办以来，无论是文稿还是图稿，竟男子作居多，女子作居少." (Since the establishment of this journal, most of the manuscripts and illustrations have been written by men, while few have been written by women.)
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Phoebe Plummer (4 of 4)
  • Comment: Please note that I have three journal articles pending at the Reference Exchange, all of which interpret the magazine and its content. There may thus be further expansion.

Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 708 past nominations.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:22, 17 November 2024 (UTC).

• Article was made on the 17th of this month, so is new enough. It is more than long enough and reads neutrally while properly using in-line citations. The copyvio detector finds no issues and I AGF on the translations, which appear to be accurate for the hooks as far as I can tell. Depressing hooks, but certainly fall under interesting and they are cited in-line. The QPQ has been done and the image presented is in the public domain and is visually understandable even at a small size. Looks good to go! Silverseren^C 00:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Other images

• 
• 

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Emancipation Pictorial/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 17:25, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: Jon698 (talk · contribs) 18:05, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

• I will conduct a review of this article once I finish Talk:Hugh O'Donnell, 2nd Earl of Tyrconnell/GA1. I would normally wait until I was further into the review before claiming another article, but this one looks so interesting that I want to claim it before anybody else could. Jon698 (talk) 18:05, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

  @Crisco 1492: Prose comments and one image comment below. Jon698 (talk) 08:38, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Prose

• 1. "was a short-lived women's magazine" -> "short-lived" seems relative. I am fine with it being kept in the article if there are other GAs or FAs with the same wording.
  • Nixed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:44, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
• 2. "Eight years since the founding of the Republic of China" -> wikilink Republic of China (1912–1949) as this is its first mention in the body
  • Linked. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:44, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
• 3. "In his introduction to the first issue, Zhou Jianyun wrote that the" -> Change to "Zhou Jianyun wrote in his introduction to the first issue that the" so that that his first mention uses his name rather than a pronoun
  • Done. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:44, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
• 4. "Also included in the Emancipation Pictorial were works of literature" -> It is grammatically correct in its current form, but "The Emancipation Pictorial also included works of literature" flows better for the reader
  • Done. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:44, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Images

• There are four images in the article, one in the infobox and three in the body.
• 1. Emancipation Pictorial, cover (1920).jpg is the cover of one of the magazine's issues. The source is adequate and the image is in the public domain in both the US and China.
• 2. Lin Xin, She is also her husband's flesh and blood, Emancipation Pictorial, August 1921.jpg is an illustration from the magazine with one of the first uses of 她. This image was uploaded to Wikipedia as it is not public domain in China, but is public domain in the US. Everything is fine with the image, but could you expand more on what 她 is for the text description underneath the image?
  • Glossed "she". — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:44, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
• 3. Woman weighed down by male supremacy, Emancipation Pictorial (1921).jpg was uploaded to Wikipedia for the same reason as #2. This image is properly used to illustrate the magazine's coverage of women's rights.
• 4. In the grip of patriarchy, Emancipation Pictorial (1921).jpg was uploaded to Wikipedia for the same reason as #2. This image is properly used to illustrate the magazine's coverage of women's rights.

References

• There are 27 references so I will review 5 of them, accounting for 18.52% of the total. I will be using the reference numbers from this version of the article.
  • 1. Page 85 of Shanghai Filmmaking: Crossing Borders, Connecting to the Globe, 1922–1938 + Page 263 of Zheng Zhegu and Performances in Early Chinese Film [Reference 2] is used to source the founders of the Xinmin Library and it publishing the Emancipation Pictorial, Yaofeng Monthly, and Spring Voice Daily. Paragraph one of page 263 sources the co-founders of the Ximin Library and it publishing the Emancipation Pictorial and Yaofeng Monthly. Paragraph 2 of page 85 states that Spring Voice Daily was published by the New People Press. On page 80 it states that the New People Society and Xinmin Library are the same. I added page 80 to the reference to make that clearer.
  • 2. Page 263 of Zheng Zhegu and Performances in Early Chinese Film [Reference 4] is used to source the magazine's support for the May Fourth Movement. This is stated in paragraph one of page 263.
  • 3. 中国妇女报刊史上首份画报 初期男作者投稿居多 [Reference 6] is used to source the majority of the magazine's contributors being male, new issues being published monthly, a woman breaking free of her shackles on the cover of the fifth issue, and the magazine being called the first illustrated periodical in China to deal with women's issues. The title of the article, when translated, states this and again in one of the headings. Paragraph 1 sources it being called the first illustrated periodical in China to deal with women's issues. Paragraph 2 covers it being a monthly publication. The second to last paragraph sources the description for the fifth issue's cover.
  • 4. Pages 83 to 84 of Shanghai Filmmaking: Crossing Borders, Connecting to the Globe, 1922–1938 [Reference 10] is used to source Zhou Jianyun's introduction stating that the Emancipation Pictorial was meant to explore women's rights in a non-academic sense and lists some topics covered by the magazine. Paragraph 3 of page 83 and paragraph 1 of page 84 do source this.
  • 5. Page 84 of Shanghai Filmmaking: Crossing Borders, Connecting to the Globe, 1922–1938. [Reference 8] is used to source the magazine being written in vernacular Chinese. Paragraphs 1 and 2 do state that the magazine used the vernacular language.
• I do not have easy access to a lot of the Chinese journals, but a review of the sources above do not inspire any doubt. I am fully confident that the page is properly sourced.

• Hi Jon698, I have made the recommended changes. Thank you for the review! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:44, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Review

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, grammar, and understandability): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   All of my prose comments above have been answered.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   A review of 18.52% of the references showed no issues with the sourcing.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   This article covers the publication history, content, and legacy of the magazine. The reader would fully understand who made the magazine and what they wrote in it.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   No neutrality issues and the article goes at length to correctly describe the magazine's stances on issues.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   The last edit from somebody who was not the nominator or reviewer was on March 20.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   The cover and illustrations from the magazine are represented in four images across the article. All of these were properly uploaded.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   No major issues or errors preventing this article from becoming a GA. It is a short and really interesting article.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.