Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Omega constant

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The omega constant is a mathematical constant defined as the unique real number that satisfies the equation

It is the value of W(1), where W is Lambert's W function. The name is derived from the alternate name for Lambert's W function, the omega function. The numerical value of Ω is given by

Ω = 0.567143290409783872999968662210... (sequence A030178 in the OEIS).
1/Ω = 1.763222834351896710225201776951... (sequence A030797 in the OEIS).

Properties

[edit]

Fixed point representation

[edit]

The defining identity can be expressed, for example, as

or

as well as

Computation

[edit]

One can calculate Ω iteratively, by starting with an initial guess Ω0, and considering the sequence

This sequence will converge to Ω as n approaches infinity. This is because Ω is an attractive fixed point of the function ex.

It is much more efficient to use the iteration

because the function

in addition to having the same fixed point, also has a derivative that vanishes there. This guarantees quadratic convergence; that is, the number of correct digits is roughly doubled with each iteration.

Using Halley's method, Ω can be approximated with cubic convergence (the number of correct digits is roughly tripled with each iteration): (see also Lambert W function § Numerical evaluation).

Integral representations

[edit]

An identity due to Victor Adamchik[citation needed] is given by the relationship

Other relations due to Mező[1][2] and Kalugin-Jeffrey-Corless[3] are:

The latter two identities can be extended to other values of the W function (see also Lambert W function § Representations).

Transcendence

[edit]

The constant Ω is transcendental. This can be seen as a direct consequence of the Lindemann–Weierstrass theorem. For a contradiction, suppose that Ω is algebraic. By the theorem, eΩ is transcendental, but Ω = eΩ, which is a contradiction. Therefore, it must be transcendental.[4]

References

[edit]
  1. Mező, István. "An integral representation for the principal branch of the Lambert W function". Retrieved 24 April 2022.
  2. Mező, István (2020). "An integral representation for the Lambert W function". arXiv:2012.02480 [math.CA]..
  3. Kalugin, German A.; Jeffrey, David J.; Corless, Robert M. (2011). "Stieltjes, Poisson and other integral representations for functions of Lambert W". arXiv:1103.5640 [math.CV]..
  4. Mező, István; Baricz, Árpád (November 2017). "On the Generalization of the Lambert W Function" (PDF). Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 369 (11): 7928. doi:10.1090/tran/6911. Retrieved 28 April 2023.
[edit]