Edge Rewrite
// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a28bfeb9fb4cada9

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Current discussions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page lists all requests filed or identified as potentially controversial which are currently under discussion.

This list is also available in a page-link-first format and in table format. 104 discussions have been relisted.

August 10, 2026

[edit source]

August 9, 2026

[edit source]
  • (Discuss)Willow Smith ? – The subject has been professionally known mononymously as Willow for many years, and her current musical releases and press coverage consistently use that name. The article itself identifies her as known mononymously as WILLOW. I believe Willow (musician) better reflects her established professional/common name, while the parenthetical distinguishes her from other uses of "Willow". Artist&Architect (talk) 19:19, 9 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)Ōharae-shikiŌharae – The usual name for this ritual in English is Ōharae. While the shiki (a suffix meaning "ritual") is sometimes added in Japanese, I can find no instances in English that have the shiki (Google Scholar results and Google Book results), whereas there are plenty of hits for just Ōharae. Sometimes we do see "Ōharae rite", where "rite" could arguably be a translation of shiki, but just Ōharae seems just as common if not more. Ngram also has no hits for the shiki version, with some for Oharae (no macron but the macron is common elsewhere and supported by Wikiproject Japan styleguide) Erynamrod (talk) 18:19, 2 August 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 17:44, 9 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)Walter H. DaltonWalter Dalton – Per WP:COMMONNAME, WP:PRECISE, and WP:CONCISE. Dalton is nearly uniformly referred to as "Walter Dalton," not "Walter H. Dalton." A Newspapers.com search for "Walter H. Dalton" in North Carolina from 1996 to 2013, the years he was most active in public service, showed only 367 results, most of which were from sources (like ballots) that generally list candidates' full names. A search for "Walter Dalton" with the same parameters showed 6,904 results. Thus, per WP:COMMONNAME, "Walter Dalton" is the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable, English-language sources). PA Uploader (talk) 15:16, 9 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)2025 Bondi Beach shootingBondi Beach shooting – Now that time has passed since this shooting occurred, we can see that this shooting is only growing in historical significance with more notability being provided constantly by news overage of the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, and the immediate aftermath resulting in proposed legislative changes, proving that a name change to remove the year per WP:NOYEAR is necessary. A terror attack of this scale or any other mass gun violence in Australia is exceptionally rare which means that this article unlikely to be mistaken for any other event. A name change was kept open as an option by the closer of the requested move in December 2025 (when the article was created) by saying that it was too soon to have the "historic perspective" to determine that the year is not needed, this consensus must be reassessed now that a few months have passed. Qwerty123M (talk) 12:27, 9 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)Hildebrando Pompeu Pinto AccioliHildebrando Accioly – This form is almost exclusively used in reliable English-language sources (see WP:COMMONNAME and WP:NCP). The Ngram Viewer shows zero English-language use of the forms ending in 'i' and a preference for the form without middle names. Contemporary English-language international-law literature consistently uses this form (e.g. author references in the American Journal of International Law from 1934", "1944", "1949" and "1956") as does the Journal of the International Commission of Jurists in 1961 and the European Journal of International Law in 2024. His works were published under this name, which is also retained in modern editions of his Manual de Direito Internacional Público (see here). The forms Accioli and Acióli occur in Portuguese-language sources as orthographically normalized variants, as Brazil’s 1943 Portuguese Orthographic Form provided that proper nouns are subject to the same rules as common nouns. The Portuguese Wikipedia article is accordingly titled ; but WP:CONSISTENT: “It is not considered important for article titles on the English Wikipedia to be consistent with the titles of corresponding articles on Wikipedia in other languages.” Redirects should be created from the forms with Accioli and Acióli and/or middle names. Joriki (talk) 09:56, 9 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)Dolphin East–West ExpresswayFlorida State Road 836 – According to this FDOT Interchange Report cited within the article, the Dolphin Expressway is specifically the name of the western tolled segment of SR 836. The eastern free segment of SR 836 signed as I-395 is specifically not part of the Dolphin Expressway. With that in mind, the current article title does not fully represent the scope of the article. Since the article is covering the entirety of SR 836, the article title should be reverted to what it was before. I believe that the previous move request was made due to misconceptions that the entire route is named the Dolphin Expressway and that SR 836 ends at the interchange with I-95. In reality, the Dolphin Expressway name only applies to the tolled segment west of I-95, and the SR 836 designation actually continues east past I-95 and runs concurrently with I-395 unsigned. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 03:02, 9 August 2026 (UTC)reply

August 8, 2026

[edit source]
  • (Discuss)Steve Miller (author, born 1957)Steve Miller (journalist) – The current disambiguator "(author, born 1957)" includes a birth year that does not appear anywhere in the article body itself — it is used solely in the page title and infobox. Since the year is not discussed, sourced in-text, or relevant to the content of the article, it serves no disambiguation purpose that a more standard descriptor couldn't accomplish. "Steve Miller (journalist)" would still clearly distinguish this article from Steve Miller (musician) and other articles under Steve Miller (disambiguation), using the subject's primary occupation rather than a birth year, consistent with how most other disambiguated biography titles on Wikipedia are formatted (e.g., by occupation rather than by birth year, per WP:NCP). This also aligns with WP:DOB, which counsels against including a birth date/year for subjects who are not high-profile public figures when it is not necessary for disambiguation or encyclopedic value and the subject has raised privacy concerns. Erichewitt (talk) 19:50, 8 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)IrumudiIrumudi (film)Irumudi is a highly popular term and is religious, especially in India and South India, it is actually associated with the Sabarimala pilgrimage. Irumudi means a sacred bundle carried by devotees. The film draws its name with that concept, and I don't think it is the primary topic for the present title name. See - https://www.sabarimala.com/sacred-irumudi.htm The previous RM's closer only considered comment focused on the fact that there is no standalone article for the religious concept and closer closed simply by just considering single input, but I don't think that alone should determine whether the film stays in "Irumudi". Readers searching for "Irumudi" may be actually looking for the religious term rather than this film. The title Irumudi (film) clearly avoids ambiguity, the title "Irumudi" can be left available for future development on actual Irumudi or it cna be made a disambiguation page. Wikipicked (talk) 12:03, 1 August 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. Thanks! —1isall (talk | contribs) 12:51, 8 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)Joe Hill (activist)Joe Hill – Clear primary topic under PT2. Searching Google Scholar, all results within the first few pages are about the labor organizer, as opposed to the author (the other most prominent topic under the name). Even searching "Joe Hill" "writer" on Google Scholar and Google Books brings up almost exclusively mentions of the organizer's writings. Out of the other topics on the disambiguation page, five are named directly after him, including a museum, charity, film, song, award, and opera in his honor (the writer himself also seems to be named for him, but that is neither here nor there), while the remaining entries are all pseudonyms or names which could be reasonably be confused with Joe Hill. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 01:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)Cinnamomum cassiaCinnamomum aromaticum – Plants of the World Online currently accepts Cinnamomum aromaticum Nees for the taxon treated in this article. The name Cinnamomum cassia (L.) J.Presl is nomenclaturally based on Laurus cassia L. and is currently treated by POWO as a synonym of Neolitsea cassia, while C. cassia Nees ex Blume is an illegitimate later homonym treated as a synonym of Cinnamomum burmanni. I therefore propose moving the article to Cinnamomum aromaticum, while retaining C. cassia prominently as a widely used alternative taxonomic treatment. Eri0n0ire (talk) 00:22, 8 August 2026 (UTC)reply

August 7, 2026

[edit source]
  • (Discuss)Hannah Ferguson (commentator) ? – When I was creating this article, I was uncertain of what the title should be, so I am opening this requested move to allow opinions to be heard on whether I chose the right title. I tried to go for the WP:COMMONNAME but that wasn't entirely clear from a quick browse of sources, I have used some different sources in the article now that it has been created so I want to make sure I have still made the right choice. I am not requiring consensus to be found on a title other than this one, I am seeking vindication or rejection of the choice I made for this title. Qwerty123M (talk) 09:03, 31 July 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 20:51, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)Grok (chatbot)Grok (AI) – the article is not just about the chatbot but a set of models and other products. Grok (AI) seems more accurate since the article goes over generative models, image and video generation, APIs and other products like Grok Build. Claude article is Claude (AI) and Claude (chatbot) redirects there. Grok (AI) and Grok AI already redirect here. ~2026-43523-46 (talk) 19:13, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)Indus OSIndus Appstore – The article should be moved to Indus Appstore because this is now the subject's primary and commonly used name in reliable independent sources. While the project originated as Indus OS, the company has since shifted its primary product and public identity to the Indus Appstore following its acquisition by PhonePe, and recent coverage consistently refers to it as "Indus Appstore" rather than "Indus OS". The current title no longer reflects the article's main subject, which is now an app marketplace rather than an operating system. Moving the page would better satisfy Wikipedia's naming criteria of recognizability, naturalness, precision, and common usage. ~2026-43638-93 (talk) 14:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)Eurovia DOOELEACOM – The company formerly known as Eurovia DOOEL has officially changed its corporate and public-facing name to EACOM. According to the official announcement, the change has been registered with the Central Registry of the Republic of North Macedonia and the business continues as the same legal entity, with no change to its existing contracts, obligations, ownership structure, or operations. The current article title is therefore outdated. The proposed title “EACOM” reflects the company’s current official and commonly used name. Official announcement: https://news.eagroup.mk/ea-group-announces-rebranding-eurovia-becomes-eacom/?lang=en Official website: https://eacom.com/ I am affiliated with the company and disclose this conflict of interest. I am requesting that independent Wikipedia editors review and implement the move. ~2026-42327-54 (talk) 09:31, 31 July 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. Maltazarianparleyinvestigate 10:25, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)Trolley Square shooting2007 Trolley Square shooting – Alt: Trolley Square massacre. The current name follows the typical naming convention of where and what, and per WP:NCWWW and it failing WP:NOYEAR, the year should be included in the title as the majority of articles should say when as well. The current title fails NOYEAR because the event does not have a unique common name, it is not one of the most well-known or impactful shootings in the United States. However, if the "Trolley Square massacre" naming is deemed to be a sufficiently WP:COMMONNAME, it can go without a year as it no longer follows the typical naming scheme of shootings and instead uses an unusual descriptor that should only be applied through sufficient common name usage. I see a lot of usage of both the term "massacre" and "shooting". I provided some comparison below of "massacre" vs. "shooting" in sources (even by the same outlets using both), but please compare with your own searches. I'm not sure how valuable Google search trends are in this instance, but here is a comparison of state () national () and worldwide (). "massacre" usage: "shooting" usage: Raskuly 🐰 07:57, 30 July 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 10:07, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)Somaliland campaignDervish War – The current title "Somaliland campaign" is both inaccurate and non-neutral per WP:NPOV. "Somaliland" was not an official political entity at the time, the territory was British Somaliland, and the fighting extended well beyond it into the Ogaden and Italian Somaliland, making the title geographically misleading. More fundamentally it frames the conflict as a British military operation rather than a war between recognised parties, which misrepresents its nature and scale. "Dervish War" is the most accurate replacement because Hassan formally constituted the Dervish State as a political entity, this was its official name, not a nickname or external label. Wikipedia convention names wars after their belligerents, and the Dervish State was the primary and consistent belligerent throughout the entire 20 year conflict regardless of which colonial powers were involved at any given time. The proposed alternative of "Dervish War (Mad Mullah)" is rejected on the grounds that "Mad Mullah" was a deliberate British propaganda label designed to delegitimise Hassan's movement and should not be perpetuated in any form per WP:NPOV. The Sudan ambiguity concern is overstated, the Mahdist War has a well established independent name universally used in the literature, and a simple disambiguation page resolves any remaining overlap. Slowsilversoldier (talk) 08:25, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)NFL KickoffNFL Kickoff Game – I believe that the recent decision to cut down the title to just "NFL Kickoff" was done with very weak consensus, and in fact, it wasn't even the original intent of that discussion. I feel this is has created confusion between the NFL Kickoff Game and the actual kickoff at the beginning of a game, and additionally, I feel we are too overly relying on what official NFL branding is, when in reality it is our job to look to what independent, reliable sources say. In this case, I see several newspapers from Newspapers.com that still refer to it as the "NFL Kickoff Game". The previous title, in my opinion, was a perfectly fine natural disambiguation. Red0ctober22 (talk) 03:32, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply

August 6, 2026

[edit source]
  • (Discuss)Alenia Aermacchi M-346 MasterLeonardo M-346 – The aircraft is now referred to overwhelmingly in reliable current sources as the Leonardo M-346 rather than the Aermacchi M-346 Master. Alenia Aermacchi no longer exists as a separate corporate brand following its integration into Leonardo. Leonardo has marketed the aircraft under its own name since 2017, and independent aviation sources likewise use "Leonardo M-346". The proposed title therefore better reflects the current common name under WP:COMMONNAME, while the historical names can remain fully explained in the article. Alfiechidzik (talk) 15:29, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)Project 596596 (nuclear test) – Scholars do not use this wording, and any online mention along the lines of WP:COMMONNAME of "Project 596" is likely to stem from this page seemingly inventing it. Each article should also make it clearer that these are the codenames of the devices and designs, the test events themselves were codenamed (Operation) 21-41, 21-72, and 21-73 respectively. See Zhang: China conducted twenty-three atmospheric nuclear tests, including seventeen airburst tests—sixteen air-dropped (codenamed 21-7x) by aircrafts over an airburst center, and one by DF-2A missile (21-2) over twenty kilometers away from the airburst center. It also conducted six surface nuclear tests (codenames 21-4x), twenty-three underground nuclear tests including eight tunnel tests (codenamed 21-9 x), and fifteen vertical shaft tests (codenamed 21-8x). See Reed, 2008, The Chinese nuclear tests, 1964–1996 and Zhang, 2025, The Untold Story of China's Nuclear Weapon Development and Testing. Doeze (talk) 13:02, 22 July 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. 1isall (talk | contribs) 13:14, 29 July 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. Maltazarianparleyinvestigate 09:22, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)Darja VidmanovaDarja Viďmanova – The present title omits the caron (ď) in the subject’s surname. Although the WTA, ITF and her English-facing profiles use the ASCII form ‘Vidmanova’, more precise official and biographical sources support ‘Viďmanova’. Most importantly, a 2016 Czech Ministry of the Interior document concerning her grant of Czech citizenship records her name as ‘Darja Viďmanova’. A substantially more recent exclusive interview, published by Livesport Zprávy on 25 September 2025, likewise uses ‘Viďmanova’ consistently and expressly explains that, because she was born in Russia, her surname is written with a short final “a”. This is unusually specific evidence that ‘Viďmanova’, rather than the fully Czechised ‘Viďmanová’, represents the appropriate diacritic spelling of her surname.[1][2] There is also substantial current usage of the closely related form ‘Viďmanová’. The Czech Tennis Federation’s official lists of national representatives for both 2025 and 2026 give her name as ‘Viďmanová’, as does its current news coverage. The English-language specialist publication Tennis.com also uses ‘Darja Viďmanová’. These sources demonstrate that preserving the Czech consonantal diacritic is not an obsolete, speculative or editor-created spelling; it is current usage by her national federation and by an English-language tennis publication.[3][4][5] Under MOS:DIACRITICS, proper names written in the Latin alphabet normally retain their special characters unless a well-established English replacement exists. ‘Vidmanova’ does not appear to be an English exonym or translated name; it is the diacritic-free form used in international tennis databases. English Wikipedia ordinarily retains Czech diacritics in the names of tennis players even where the WTA and ITF suppress them. The evidence concerning the final vowel should nevertheless be distinguished from the evidence concerning the caron. The federation and many Czech publications regularise the surname to the conventionally Czech feminine form ‘Viďmanová’, but both the official citizenship document and the 2025 biographical interview support the short-final-’‘a’’ form ‘Viďmanova’. The proposed title therefore restores the demonstrably supported consonantal diacritic without imposing the Czech feminine ending that the more name-specific sources indicate she does not use. The previous requested move relied heavily on the unaccented forms displayed by the WTA, ITF, the University of Georgia and the subject’s English-facing accounts. Those remain relevant evidence, and ‘Darja Vidmanova’ should of course remain a redirect. However, the Ministry record and especially the September 2025 interview provide more specific evidence concerning the surname’s actual spelling than a database or social-media form that may omit diacritics for international accessibility. The subsequent 2025 and 2026 federation rosters further demonstrate continuing official use of the diacritic. Accordingly, ‘Darja Viďmanova’ best reconciles the subject-specific evidence, current institutional usage and Wikipedia’s normal retention of Latin-script diacritics. ‘Darja Viďmanová’ should also remain a redirect and may be mentioned in the lead as the form commonly used in Czech sources. Rovingrobert (talk) 09:05, 6 August 2026 (UTC)reply

August 5, 2026

[edit source]
  • (Discuss)KZACKSFO (560 AM) – With today's news that this radio station facility has been surrendered, it now makes sense to move it to this title, per the last meaningful broadcast provision and defunct station priority order in WP:NCBC. The call sign KZAC was adopted after KSFO programming and branding was moved to 810, and the only transmissions after the call sign change were a simulcast and then, in the final weeks, a looping message urging listeners to retune to 810. KZAC is not the common name that would be expected of this facility. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 18:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)Resumption of meiosisResumption of meiosis in oocytes – Or "in oogenesis", per MOS:PRECISION. On one hand the term "resumption of meiosis" is in fact exclusively used in reproductive biology in meaning described in the article, however, from a Scholar search it seems like it's rarely used explicite, but often it's precised that this resumption specifically concerns oocytes. As much as this would be my original research, I really belive this might be confusing to non-experts like graduate students, and the preference to add mention of oocytes or oogenesis can beeasily demonstrated by searching science papers databases. InternetowyGołąb (talk) 18:01, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)JJ WeihlDiscovery Zone (musician) – The subject has for years been primarily known publicly as the musician Discovery Zone, under which she releases her albums (e.g. on Mansions & Millions and RVNG Intl.) and under which reliable sources predominantly refer to her. While she is also active as a multimedia artist and filmmaker, her most common public identity for years has been the musician Discovery Zone. Per WP:COMMONNAME the article is better titled "Discovery Zone (musician)" (the plain title "Discovery Zone" being the play-centre chain), with "JJ Weihl" kept as a redirect. Disclosure: I have a conflict of interest — I am connected to her record label — and am raising this for the community to decide rather than moving the page myself. Antontei (talk) 11:47, 29 July 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. Thanks! —1isall (talk | contribs) 12:15, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)Mass media in Ba'athist SyriaMedia in Syria – Six years ago, this was the title of this article, and it is now a redirect. As argued above (in "Article title change"), changing from "media" to "mass media" made no sense, since the article covers the media broadly. Now that Assad has fallen, the article needs to be updated, but creating a new article "Media in Syria after the fall of Assad" creates an unnecessary split. "Media in Syria" can include both the historical situation and the present one. Lova Falk (talk) 07:50, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)Capital Gazette shooting2018 Capital Gazette shooting – A lack of other notable shootings at the Capital Gazette office does not imply that a year is not necessary, factors such as how identifiable the incident does, and this incident does not appear to reach that level of notoriety. Please note that WP:NCWWW states that most events titles should say when, where, and what happened. Years are not WP:OVERPRECISION (please note that exceptions to the precision criterion are a result of the application of other naming criterion) or only usable for disambiguation (if this were the case, then part of NCWWW would be basically irrelevant, and guidelines and policies should work in harmony, not in opposition to one another). Readers should not be confused if there have been other notable shootings at the Capital Gazette office because if there had been, it should be mentioned and linked to in the article, like with the distinguish template. Please also note that for WP:NOYEAR to apply, it must either have a special common name that does not follow the typical where and what format or it must be so incredibly well known that it can manage without a year. Additionally, the sentence "The date is not needed when the article pertains to events that are unlikely to recur" refers to events involving individual people or persons. Unlike the Charlie Hebdo shooting, this is not the actual name of the newspaper. Raskuly 🐰 02:54, 20 July 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 03:19, 5 August 2026 (UTC)reply

August 4, 2026

[edit source]
  • (Discuss)IbaiIbai (given name) – the internet celebrity, known mononymously as Ibai, is the primary topic for Ibai. Forbes named him the most influential Spanish influencer, he hosts the most viewed internet broadcast, which garnered over nine million concurrent viewers last year, and his social media accounts have tens of million followers. The other holders of the name are cyclists and footballers not known mononymously and less notable. Over the last 5 years, the internet celebrity has received 80% of the views. A majority of clicks on this disambig go to the internet celebrity. I am not familiar with the protocol for moving to mononyms (e.g., Beyonce), but the internet celebrity definitely merits a primary redirect 1brianm7 (talk) 21:38, 4 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)Gulf WarPersian Gulf War – I propose moving Gulf War to Persian Gulf War to adhere to Wikipedia’s core naming policies: WP:COMMONNAME, WP:PRECISE, and WP:DISAMBIGUATION. 1. **International and Academic Standard (WP:COMMONNAME):** Globally, the full geographical term "Persian Gulf War" remains the primary formal standard in major encyclopedias, international news agencies (e.g., BBC, Reuters), history textbooks, and scholarly literature. While "Gulf War" is a common shorthand, Wikipedia titles generally favor the formal, globally recognized proper name when shorthand creates ambiguity. 2. **Avoiding Ambiguity (WP:PRECISE & WP:DISAMBIGUATION):** The term "Gulf War" can refer to multiple conflicts in the region, including the Iran–Iraq War (often called the First Persian Gulf War) and the 2003 Iraq War (often called the Second Gulf War). Renaming this article to Persian Gulf War provides clarity and explicitly distinguishes the 1990–1991 conflict from other regional modern wars. 3. **Consistency with Geographic Naming:** The primary body of water involved is internationally recognized as the Persian Gulf. Using the complete geographical name aligns the article title with the standard naming conventions used across other geographical and historical entries on Wikipedia. Operdesertstorm (talk) 18:55, 4 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)Fuchs GroupFuchs Gruppe – Fuchs Group is the established English designation of Fuchs SE, the MDAX-listed lubricants manufacturer in Mannheim, which brands itself as Fuchs Group throughout its English-language communications and is several times larger by revenue and English-language coverage. The current title is therefore ambiguous and points readers to the wrong company. English-language sources refer to the subject of this article as Fuchs Gruppe, including its own English-language site at fuchsgruppe.com/en and independent coverage such as Grant Thornton UK; the name is a proper noun left untranslated in English, comparable to Deutsche Bahn. The proposed title is more precise (WP:PRECISION) and provides natural disambiguation without a parenthetical qualifier. "Fuchs Group" should be retargeted to Fuchs SE after the move, with a hatnote there pointing here. MB at Fuchs (talk) 08:09, 28 July 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. Thanks! —1isall (talk | contribs) 12:18, 4 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)FangdaFangda Partners – “Fangda Partners” is the firm’s complete and official English name and is the name consistently used by independent legal-industry sources, including Chambers and Partners, The Lawyer, Asian Legal Business and IFLR. The current title “Fangda” is less precise and may be confused with unrelated organisations using the Fangda name. “Fangda Partners” more clearly and accurately identifies the subject of the article. 9506a (talk) 08:37, 4 August 2026 (UTC)reply

August 3, 2026

[edit source]

Elapsed listings

[edit source]
  • (Discuss)LudditeLuddites – This article specifically talks about Luddites, not specific workers described as 'a Luddite'. The bold text at the start of the article literally states "The Luddites..." not "A Luddite is a...". Most links to this page are also written as 'Luddites' or 'Luddite movement', not the singular 'Luddite'. 'Luddites' is also the more common name for the historical group, whereas 'Luddite' is more often used as a descriptor of a person (usually meant to insult, see modern AI drama) and should honestly have it's own article on the descriptor itself, but I digress; that is a matter for another time. For now, this should be moved. Ilov3gam3z (talk) 23:41, 18 July 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 00:28, 26 July 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. Maltazarianparleyinvestigate 11:36, 2 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Backlog

[edit source]
  • (Discuss)Novopavlivka offensiveDnipropetrovsk Oblast offensive (2025–present) – I had already expressed concerns over this article's scope at Talk:Novopavlivka offensive#Scope (I'll be pinging some users from that discussion). Essentially I expressed some doubt over the decision to focus this article on the settlement of Novopavlivka. To me it seemed back then, and still does, that this article focused more simply on Russian advances into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast than on this little settlement. The article itself currently states the following: The locality itself [Novopavlivka] is not particularly strategic, though its location just over the border of the Dnipropetrovsk region makes it significant as Russia has not entered this oblast in the first three years of their full-scale invasion. Therefore, it would mainly mark a moral blow for Ukraine, should Russia cross into the Dnipropetrovsk region and seize Novopavlivka. It puts more weight on the simple fact that Russia has reentered this oblast than on the advances towards this particular settlement, and I would argue WP:RS coverage has focused more on this too. Novopavlivka is a small settlement of 3,439 people (2001). Typically we've had articles on offensives on specific settlements for small towns, larger than this one. I Know I'm Not Alone, the author of much of this article, did make some fair defense on the use of Novopavlivka as the article's focus at the aforementioned discussion. Nonetheless, as you can see on the map (outdated by the way), most of the territory taken during the offensive covered in this article is located in a different part of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, near Velykomykhailivka. IiSmxyzXX also made some argumentation on this point and on the notion that this offensive being focused on Novopavlivka specifically might be WP:OR. I believe sources have focused more on the simple fact that Russia has achieved advances in a different oblast beyond Donetsk Oblast. This article is notable in my opinion largely due to this psychological and PR effect. Sources cited in this article seem to struggle giving this offensive a particular strategic sense, and I don't think there's many capable of doing this among the sources not already cited. Thus, I would like to propose renaming this article to better reflect its focus on, simply, Russian advances into this oblast beyond the Donbas region. It is necessary to differentiate these advances from the ones that took place in 2022 (see more at Russian occupation of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast#2022) and also to note the fact that this offensive is apparently still ongoing (though this article should be updated after the events of the 2026 Southern Ukraine counteroffensive). Such a format title is already employed in this topic area (e.g. Russo-Ukrainian war (2022–present), Dnieper campaign (2022–present)) and it suggests treating the topic in a similar fashion to other in my opinion comparable cases, such as the 2025 Sumy offensive. We could still mention Novopavlivka in some section header, it would be completely fair in my view to divide this article into two axes, one for Novopavlivka and another for Velykomykhailivka (we've already done stuff like this, see the sections at 2023 Ukrainian counteroffensive). "Dnipropetrovsk offensive (2025–present)" could also be an alternative WP:CONSISTENT with the aforementioned Sumy offensive that has taken place in the oblast and not the city, and in this particular case it would be unambiguous as the capital is not called Dnipropetrovsk but Dnipro. But then we also have Northeast Donetsk Oblast campaign for example. And given the apparent lack of a strategic single focus, with this article focusing more on military engagements taking place on a specific defined area, "campaign" might be a better choice over "offensive". I invite editors to discuss all possible options. Regards, Super Ψ Dro 00:21, 18 June 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 21:02, 25 June 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 02:44, 8 July 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 02:31, 20 July 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. Maltazarianparleyinvestigate 11:36, 1 August 2026 (UTC)reply
  • (Discuss)Operation Kikusui IOperation Ten-Ichi-Go – I hate to open another move request so soon after the last one closed, but it looks like the previous move was done without reference to sources. Unfortunately, I believe the new name chosen was incorrect. The Japanese plan for resisting the American invasion of Okinawa was named Ten-Go Sakusen (Operation Heaven). In the initial planning, Ten-Go did not include a naval component. It only included ground force elements and a series of aerial kamikaze attacks designated Kikusui Sakusen (Operation Floating Chrysanthemum). After the Emperor noted the lack of the Navy's participation, the attack by the Yamato and company was added at the last minute. This was designated Ten-Ichi-Go Sakusen (Operation Heaven 1). The Japanese Wikipedia helpfully includes the actual text of the order, with source: 「航空攻撃有利なる場合、1YBは特令により出撃し敵攻略部隊を撃滅す。本作戦を天一号作戦と呼称す」 "Should conditions for an aerial offensive prove favorable, the 1st Surface Attack Unit shall sortie under special orders to annihilate the enemy invasion force. This operation shall be designated Operation Heaven 1." Source: Official Japanese war history (Senshi Sōsho), Vol 93, pg 258-259 Each of the ten Kikusui attacks was numbered one through ten, i.e. Kikusui I, Kikusui II. Note they do not include the word Sakusen (Operation). The aerial attacks are distinguished in reliable sources from the attack by the Yamato. For example, 'Chronology of the War at Sea, 1939-1945 : the Naval History of World War II' mentions the two separately (pg. 407). Tagging original requestor: @Palm Dogg, relisters: @Bunnypranav, @Sophisticatedevening, @Jeffery34964, and closer: @FOARP Voteins (talk) 02:44, 4 June 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 07:56, 11 June 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 00:27, 24 June 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. Maltazarianparleyinvestigate 06:34, 1 July 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 04:34, 20 July 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. Maltazarianparleyinvestigate 11:34, 1 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Malformed requests

[edit source]

Possibly incomplete requests

[edit source]

References

[edit source]
  1. "Č. j. MV-128506-2/VS-2016" [File no. MV-128506-2/VS-2016] (in Czech). Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky. 22 September 2016. p. 2. Retrieved 6 August 2026.
  2. Teruzzi, Kateřina (25 September 2025). "Češka s ruskými kořeny: Chci v Americe žít i hrát, má jasno Viďmanova" [Czech player with Russian roots: I want to live and play in America, Viďmanova is clear]. TenisPortal.cz (in Czech). Livesport. Retrieved 6 August 2026.
  3. "Seznam reprezentantů 2025" [List of national representatives 2025] (PDF) (in Czech). Český tenisový svaz. p. 3. Retrieved 6 August 2026.
  4. "Seznam reprezentantů 2026" [List of national representatives 2026] (PDF) (in Czech). Český tenisový svaz. p. 3. Retrieved 6 August 2026.
  5. "Kristina Liutova vs Darja Viďmanová · Final · WTA Memphis". Tennis.com. 2 August 2026. Retrieved 6 August 2026.