Talk:Cosmopolitanism
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cosmopolitanism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other notable and relevant philosophy.
[edit]The author (and founder of the Bahá'í Faith) Bahá'ú'lláh wrote on numerous occasions of ideas similar to cosmopolitanism e.g. the Oneness of Humanity which is not particularly dissimilar from cosmopolitanism, and could be a relevant point for the history of Cosmopolitanism. Considering similarity, it could make sense to have a paragraph and/or section about that. Samuelhautamaki (talk) 21:03, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
Requested move 3 October 2026
[edit]
It has been proposed in this section that Cosmopolitanism be renamed and moved to Philosophy of Globalization. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Cosmopolitanism → Philosophy of Globalization – Why open literature support new title. Kourus senghor (talk) 14:20, 3 October 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose unless a real rationale is given (and probably even then). In case the link takes 5 minutes to open for anyone else, it is to a single edited volume, Philosophy of Globalization, published by De Gruyter in 2018. Most of the hits for "cosmopolitanism" in the book are for the chapter "Hospitality, Coercion and Peace in Kant". In other chapters we get sentences like "A politics of translation and a cosmopolitanism of difference could make the globalization process a space for negotiation and co-operation oriented towards the construction of a less unjust world" (p. 134). I don't see anything in this source that indicates the term "cosmopolitanism" is itself in any way inappropriate as an article title, and it's unclear why we would follow this source if it did. Dekimasuよ! 18:19, 3 October 2026 (UTC)
- oppose no rational given—blindlynx 23:43, 3 October 2026 (UTC)
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class Globalization articles
- High-importance Globalization articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Low-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- C-Class International relations articles
- Top-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- C-Class sociology articles
- High-importance sociology articles
- Requested moves
