Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Brazil was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Latin AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Latin AmericaLatin America
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry
Other: add {{WPCountries}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess.
Text or other creative content from this version of Tourism in Brazil was copied or moved into Brazil with this edit on 29 October 2008. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
Other talk page banners
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2010, when it received 6,785,350 views.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
Latest comment: 2 months ago4 comments4 people in discussion
Since someone decided all the article's images must be in one side only, this article has become AWFUL. No single image stays within the topic it illustrates. ETQueEsteveEmVarginha (talk) 00:11, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
we have a lot of extra images I'll go through them see which ones are most relevant there's always been an image spam problem here. Moxy🍁00:23, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
MOS:IMAGELOC presumably is what motivated putting all the images on the right side. I agree that this article has an "image spam" problem, but addressing that problem involves deciding which images to keep and which to discard. Bruce leverett (talk) 12:28, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
The HDI recently updated in this article (0.805, 66th) is incorrect and based on a confusion between two different indices. The source cited (UOL) and the UNDP Brazil panel linked refer to the MHDI (Municipal Human Development Index), a methodology adapted by UNDP Brazil for subnational analysis. This index does not produce international rankings and is not comparable across countries. The correct global HDI, as published in the official Human Development Report 2025 by UNDP, uses 2023 reference data and places Brazil at: * HDI: 0.786 * Rank: 84th out of 193 countries * Category: High human development (below the 0.800 threshold for "very high") ~2026-34611-85 (talk) 15:08, 11 June 2026 (UTC)Reply