Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

4 October 2026

To nominate an article for deletion or merging, follow these instructions.

Guide to deletion

Typhoon Nuri (2014)

Typhoon Nuri (2014) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Copied from talk page on behalf of TA (permalink). Primefac (talk) 19:32, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

The storm barely had any impacts and any impacts it had can easily be contained in 2014 Pacific typhoon season. I know a past merge proposal into November 2014 Bering Sea cyclone failed, but many expressed it wasn’t notable enough and should just be in the pacific typhoon article. ~2026-53478-79 (talk) 18:20, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Weather and Philippines. Primefac (talk) 19:32, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

TV Edwards

TV Edwards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite being WP:REFBOMBed, this British law firm does not appear to be notable under WP:NCORP. Across 72 sources, there is not a single one that shows WP:SIGCOV in WP:SIRS. Instead, the sources are:

• WP:PRIMARYSOURCEs (, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , )
• WP:CORPTRIV in WP:TRADES covering mergers, personnel moves, etc. (, , , , )
• Non-independent WP:TRADES coverage based solely on press releases/statements by employees of the firm (, , , )
• Mentions of the company in user-data-submitted ranking programs (see RSN discussion) (, , , , [ourt-of-protection/3239-tv-edwards-solicitors-llp, , )
• WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs in coverage of other topics (, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , )
• Non-independent writings by the firm's personnel (, , )
• The firm's own website (, , )
• Sources that don't mention the subject (, , , , , , )

The best source is this one, but the company still only gets a few mentions in a much longer article and I don't think it's even close to SIGCOV. There's so much reliance on primary sources and sources that don't mention the subject that I consider this to be a piece of original research and thus fails both WP:NCORP and the WP:NOT test. And while I don't detect strong WP:AISIGNS, earlier versions included dead links in sources that were dead at the time of publishing, and the page creator acknowledged using AI to format citations, so it's possible there is a need to look for AI-related issues as well. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:15, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Companies, Suspected AI-generated articles, and England. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:15, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Colegio Don Bosco

Colegio Don Bosco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:GNG nor WP:NSCHOOL. Most mentions are trivial or routine coverage, and those that aren't are for one event that only received coverage for a few months and seemingly left no impact, thus it's not sustained. smallest red boy (talk • contribs) 19:02, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Chile. smallest red boy (talk • contribs) 19:02, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Liceo Berta Zamorano Lizana

Liceo Berta Zamorano Lizana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The school does not pass WP:GNG / WP:NSCHOOL as there is not enough WP:SIGCOV. Most of the online articles are just mentions in city events, and the other two are routine coverage of 1) violence in the school and 2) a science activity. smallest red boy (talk • contribs) 18:55, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Chile. smallest red boy (talk • contribs) 18:55, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Fluentify

Fluentify (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ordinary company with trivial coverage. Hitaki-oro · 🈳🉐 18:23, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Websites, Ireland, United Kingdom, and England. Hitaki-oro · 🈳🉐 18:23, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Reviewing the sources in the article found no significant coverage, and a search online did not find any either, meaning this topic is not notable. QuicoleJR (talk|edits) 19:21, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

PIXELearning Ltd

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/PIXELearning Ltd
• Articles for deletion/PIXELearning Ltd (2nd nomination)

PIXELearning Ltd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. Hitaki-oro · 🈳🉐 18:22, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Software, United Kingdom, and England. Hitaki-oro · 🈳🉐 18:22, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

David Haddleton

David Haddleton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If I understand WP:NPROF, this professor doesn't meet the criteria. Hitaki-oro · 🈳🉐 18:21, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Chemistry, United Kingdom, England, and United States of America. Hitaki-oro · 🈳🉐 18:21, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Keep - Meets WP:NPROF as his work has been highly cited, clearly meeting Criteria #1. His h-index is 98 per Google scholar. His work has been cited by others 32,434 times. Thus his research has made a significant impact on their scholarly field. Also meets criteria #3 as a Fellow of the Royal Society of Chemistry.Netherzone (talk) 19:13, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Medherant

Medherant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks WP:SIGCOV. Article is used for promotion. Hitaki-oro · 🈳🉐 18:13, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, Medicine, Ireland, United Kingdom, and England. Hitaki-oro · 🈳🉐 18:13, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

ScriptSwitch

ScriptSwitch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company with trivial coverage Hitaki-oro · 🈳🉐 18:06, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, Software, Ireland, United Kingdom, and England. Hitaki-oro · 🈳🉐 18:06, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Livingbridge

Livingbridge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company with trivial coverage. Hitaki-oro · 🈳🉐 18:04, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, United Kingdom, England, and Australia. Hitaki-oro · 🈳🉐 18:04, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:05, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:NCORP. Routine annoucements and standard business news is insufficient to pass WP:SIRS. scope_creep^Talk

Accusonus

Accusonus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Meta Platforms because individually the startup is not notable. Hitaki-oro · 🈳🉐 17:24, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, Software, and Greece. Hitaki-oro · 🈳🉐 17:24, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Hawklords

Hawklords (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge to Hawkwind. Not enough sources distinguishing this from Hawkwind beyond it being a short-lived name change. No point in maintaining a separate article. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 16:49, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 16:49, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

British Rail Class 499 (TLV)

British Rail Class 499 (TLV) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article tagged as needing sources since 2019, with only a single source that only serves to establish its existence. Fails WP:GNG. Penn65 (talk|cont) 16:36, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and United Kingdom. Penn65 (talk|cont) 16:36, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of England-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:45, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

St. Gregory's Academy

St. Gregory's Academy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A small school that closed in 2012 after 19 years of operation, and which did not seem to gain significant coverage while it existed. It is briefly mentioned in an EWTN article, but our best source is a short treatment local newspaper. So it does not seem we have multiple sources addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth, as required by WP:SIRS. Since the school is closed, significant coverage is unlikely to appear in the future. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 15:52, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Christianity. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 15:52, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Pennsylvania. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:28, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Delete- This article is a very short stub that falls WP:NOTABLE. It clearly doesn’t have enough context to be an article. MarioWonderExpert (talk) 17:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Kesava Pillai of Kandamath

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Kesava Pillai of Kandamath
• Articles for deletion/Kesava Pillai of Kandamath (2nd nomination)

Kesava Pillai of Kandamath (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In traditional land tenure systems (and still recognized under modern Indian property law), a temple deity or family guardian spirit is treated as a "juridical person" capable of owning land.It does not imply that a royal king owned the village of Chenkal.Outside of the specific claims made by that family lineage—which have subsequently been mirrored on crowdsourced public platforms like Wikipedia—there is no independent, authoritative historical record or royal text that documents a sovereign "Kandamath Palace" as a seat of regional rule. The claim that he was a documented Jenmi or "Zamindar" who held massive tracts exists only on that Wikipedia page and its mirror sites—it does not exist in the actual sovereign archives of Travancore."Madom Thampuran Vaka" is standard tax and property terminology denoting land assigned to a family shrine or guardian spirit.Modern family chroniclers or casual internet editors took that exact property phrase from old deeds, misread the word "Thampuran" as a literal royal king, upgraded the family's ancestral Madom (homestead) into a "medieval palace," and pasted it onto Wikipedia. Over time, lazy internet copy-pasting turned a private family claim into a pseudo-historical "fact."The most damning proof against the palace narrative is its complete absence from official archaeological and cultural documentations. The Government of Kerala's Archaeology Department and extensive regional historical surveys (like the Heritage Series Thiruvananthapuram directories) meticulously catalog every single legitimate ruined fort, summer house, Kottaram, and Kovilakam in the Neyyattinkara and Amaravila belt. While they document authentic historical landmarks like the Ammachi Plavu or local Ay-dynasty relics, no state survey lists or recognizes a "Kandamath Palace".The claim on Wikipedia that Kesava Pillai was born in Vaikom in 1830 to a Namboothiri father exposes the absolute ignorance of the editors regarding 19th-century Marumakkathayam (matrilineal succession) and Sambandham marriage customs. Under Marumakkathayam, a child belong strictly to the mother's Tharavad and is always born at the mother's ancestral home. The father (especially a Namboothiri) merely visited the mother's house; the pregnant mother would never travel to or give birth at the father's estate.For Kesava Pillai to inherit the Kandamath estate in Chenkal under matrilineal law, his mother had to be rooted right there in the local Chenkal lineage. Claiming he was born at his father's house in Vaikom is a structural and anthropological impossibility designed to insert a prestigious geographic narrative while completely erasing the mother's identity (which explains why her name is conveniently omitted from their text).The narrative attempts to paint the family as a "cadet branch of the ancient line of Odanad rulers from the Kayamkulam Kingdom" seeking refuge in Chenkal during "medieval times." • The Math Defeating the Myth: The historic Kayamkulam War, where Marthanda Varma annexed the Odanad kingdom, famously concluded in 1746. If Kesava Pillai was born in 1830, placing the family's migration as "refugees from the Kayamkulam war" creates a massive, absurd chronological gap. This lazy juxtaposition of historical events completely falls apart under basic timeline verification.The profile picture uploaded on Wikipedia to represent the "Pillai of Kandamath" is nothing more than a cropped detail of a famous 1881 historical oil painting by Raja Ravi Varma.The canvas is titled "The Maharaja of Travancore and his younger brother welcoming Richard Temple-Nugent-Brydges-Chandos-Grenville, 3rd Duke of Buckingham and Chandos, Governor-General of Madras, on his official visit to Trivandrum in 1880". • The noblemen depicted standing in the background are standard members of the Travancore royal retinue and the Nair Brigade. Cropping a random face out of a famous, globally cataloged historical masterpiece and labeling it as a private family portrait of "Kesava Pillai" is a laughable act of modern forgery. The Wikipedia article states: "He was nominated for the seat of Neyyatinkara Taluk by the Maharajah in the newly formed Sree Mulam Council". This sentence alone contains an absolute historical and institutional impossibility:The Popular Assembly (Praja Sabha) which was formed in 1904, represented local taluks and land-holdings, and its members were strictly recorded in the Proceeding records. If he were nominated by the Maharaja to represent Neyyattinkara, his name must have appeared on pages 55–56 of the 1905 Almanac. Its absence is definitive proof he was never there.The "Sree Mulam Council" (upper house) did not have local taluk-level representatives nominated in that manner. The editors fabricated a political title by mixing up the terminology of two entirely different governing bodies.Official Travancore records from that exact 1904–1910 period show completely different, well-documented figures representing the Neyyattinkara region. Most famously, the legendary social reformer Ayyankali was nominated to the Sree Moolam Popular Assembly in 1911 to represent the region, and the fiery journalist Swadeshabhimani Ramakrishna Pillai was elected to the Assembly in 1910 specifically from the Neyyattinkara constituency. The official records are fully accounted for, and there is simply no historical "vacancy" or record for a Kesava Pillai of Kandamath.When family chroniclers try to engineer a "royal" or "elite political" ancestry, they look for prestigious historic institutions to attach their ancestors' names to. Because the Sree Moolam Popular Assembly was India's very first popularly elected legislature, it carries massive historical prestige. The writers assumed that because it happened over a century ago, nobody would ever go to the archives. OutroCanary (talk) 15:40, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Kerala. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:31, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: I suspect the nominator's wall of text is not likely to be read in full by many (not even myself, to be frank), so I'll just point out that the first nomination from 2016 ended with "no consensus" and minimal participation. (I can parse the nominator is claiming this is a hoax, a matter for which I have no opinion on; the 2016 nomination was simply based on notability concerns and nothing else.). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:53, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Party of Free People

Party of Free People (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNC. Non-independent or trivial sources Strainu (talk) 14:59, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Romania. Strainu (talk) 14:59, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:31, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

National Democratic Christian Party

National Democratic Christian Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very small party, just one source mentioning the dissolution of the party. Strainu (talk) 14:48, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Romania. Strainu (talk) 14:48, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Christianity. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:32, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Coalition for Baia Mare

Coalition for Baia Mare (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNC. Local alliance, local sources. Strainu (talk) 14:42, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Romania. Strainu (talk) 14:42, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:27, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Volt Romania

Volt Romania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small party, no independent coverage. News are almost exclusively from the creation announcement. Strainu (talk) 14:31, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Romania. Strainu (talk) 14:31, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:26, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Platform for Democracy, Prosperity, and Progress

Platform for Democracy, Prosperity, and Progress (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

1-time alliance of mostly non-notable parties. The news sources are made mostly from party statements. Strainu (talk) 14:29, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Romania. Strainu (talk) 14:29, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:27, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Vanuatu women's national under-19 cricket team

Vanuatu women's national under-19 cricket team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:SIGCOV on independent reliable sources other than the WP:ROUTINE coverage, fails WP:GNG for a standalone article.. Vestrian24Bio 13:59, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Sports, Cricket, and Vanuatu. Vestrian24Bio 14:01, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Delete- Nearly zero context, fails WP:NOTABLE and WP:GNG. MarioWonderExpert (talk) 17:53, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:55, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Maya no Souretsu

Maya no Souretsu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the article does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Any reliable secondary sources I find in Japanese or English are scarce, if existent. The Japanese Wikipedia article also has issues with notability. Z. Patterson (talk) 12:58, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Anime and manga, LGBTQ+ studies, and Japan. Z. Patterson (talk) 12:58, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Oshiete! 3 Shimai

Oshiete! 3 Shimai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The episode does not appear notable. Anything I find on the episode are either primary sources or unreliable sources. I do not think the episode meets WP:NEPISODE or WP:GNG. Z. Patterson (talk) 12:48, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Japan. Z. Patterson (talk) 12:48, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Death literacy

Death literacy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite a slew of references this term is a non notable neologism. It is not a term in the public parlance. Fails WP:GNG. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 08:23, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Psychology and Social science. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 08:23, 10 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: Under WP:NEO this might have a better home in Wiktionary. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 08:58, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus. AI Polished comment

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

I believe the article meets the General Notability Guideline (GNG). The nomination argues that "death literacy" is a non-notable neologism not in public parlance. However, the GNG is based on whether a subject has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, rather than on whether it is a common term in everyday language.

Independent media coverage:

The article now cites substantial media coverage of death literacy from multiple independent sources:

The Guardian (2016) discussed "death literacy" in an article about end-of-life conversations.

The Saturday Paper (2017) published an article specifically about death literacy and dying at home.

ABC News (2017) covered the concept in connection with Dying to Know Day, and in 2019 reported on an ACT inquiry that identified a need for improved death literacy and discussed Death Cafés as one response.

The Irish News (2025) reported on research examining death literacy across Ireland.

The Belfast Telegraph (2025) reported on the findings of that research, including differences in death literacy between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland.

The New Indian Express (2026) discussed death literacy in the context of end-of-life decision-making.

These are independent media sources, published over a period of ten years and across several countries. They demonstrate that the concept has received coverage beyond the original researchers and their publications.

International academic adoption:

The concept has also been taken up by researchers internationally. The Death Literacy Index has been adapted and validated in Turkey and Sweden, and used in population studies in the United Kingdom, Ireland and Singapore. A 2026 paper describes death literacy as an emerging research area and examines its use in policy and practice.

GNG:

The relevant question is therefore not whether "death literacy" is a term in common public parlance, but whether the subject has received significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. I believe the body of independent media coverage now cited in the article demonstrates that it has, and I have added these sources to the article.

I welcome further discussion.

K Karenthecelebrant (talk) 23:49, 10 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:TNT - potentially notable topic, but this is mostly original content, with a new title. Bearian (talk) 04:36, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEWLLM. The topic is notable, but this article is AI-generated. Kelob2678 (talk) 19:01, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

  Why not stubify the article? The sources from the edit history could be useful in rewriting the article. Katzrockso (talk) 07:46, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  Stubification is fine, but someone should do it first. There is an obvious tension with WP:ATD-E, but WP:NEWLLM enjoys community support both in terms of wording and practice, and is more specific. Another practical issue is that unless the article is made compliant now, it won't be made compliant in the near future (yes, WP:NODEADLINE, but everything has a deadline). Kelob2678 (talk) 08:02, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  I would do it, but the last time I performed stubification during an AfD, it wasn't taken well. I would commit to stubifying following the result of the AfD.

  The editing policy (which takes precedence over the NOLLM guideline? states that editors should Fix problems if you can, tag or remove them if you can't. Preserve appropriate content. Removing all the content but even just one or two sentences from the lead (rewritten if necessary) would remove all problematic AI generated content and would address all relevant reasons for deletion. The deletion policy (specifically WP:ATD) says If editing can address all relevant reasons for deletion, this should be done rather than deleting the page. There is no rationale for why deleting the article is preferable to stubifying it - a notable topic would belong in a finished encyclopedia, so PRESERVE mandates that we keep it in some form. Katzrockso (talk) 18:33, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  If you rewrite the article, I will change my vote. Actual community practice is more important than the text of policies and guidelines. It is clear that the community wants articles like this to be deleted, and I see no reason to dissent. If consensus were different, I would vote differently. Kelob2678 (talk) 19:03, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  Regarding the last time I performed stubification during an AfD, it wasn't taken well, I recall this ANI thread (from WP:ARBDEL) in which the policy-compliant phrase (per WP:OVERCOME and WP:NEXIST) Article improvement is *not* a proper response in the middle of an AfD where the article is essentially rewritten and materially different was criticized. In this case, article improvement actually addresses the underlying issue. Kelob2678 (talk) 08:07, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep but stubify to remove NOLLM violations. Quick search on Google scholar found at least ten papers which primarily address this as the subject Katzrockso (talk) 07:48, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

The argument that the subject is not in the public parlance is irrelevant - Wikipedia covers topics of both specialist and general interest. There is no requirement in the GNG that a term needs to be known to the general public, only that reliable sources cover the subject. In this case, there are a number of reliable sources, even if those are specialist. Katzrockso (talk) 07:49, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 16:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus. AI Polished

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

The current article is not the original draft that was previously declined at AfC. Following that review, I substantially rewrote the article from the cited sources. The present version is a new, source-based draft. Since this discussion began, I have continued to edit the article to improve accuracy and clarity, including:

- Correcting the description of the Irish research (the DLI was adapted for use in Ireland, not used in a population study).

- Refining the wording of the research findings so they accurately reflect the published, cited paper.

- Clarifying the description of the media sources.

I therefore do not think the existence of the earlier draft establishes that the current article is AI-generated. The article has been substantially rewritten and continues to be improved. I welcome further discussion ~~~~ Karenthecelebrant (talk) 05:44, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep in trusting that @Karenthecelebrant is telling the truth here. It doesn't read like an LLM, and the sourcing is broad and of great enough import to justify retainment notwithstanding.

CSGinger14 (talk) 03:51, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:11, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete - coverage via reliable sources appears to be trivial. Term itself appears to not be significantly covered besides a few sentence mentions. Might be a better fit in Wiktionary.

PicoMath (talk) 21:47, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus. AI Polished

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

I appreciate the comment. I don't believe the sources cited are merely trivial mentions of the term.

Several of the independent media sources give death literacy substantial coverage as a subject in its own right. The Guardian published a dedicated article titled "Festival of dying: is your 'death literacy' lacking?", which discusses the concept in the context of preparation for death and developing practical knowledge around death and dying. The Saturday Paper published "Death literacy and dying at home", which examines the concept in the context of end-of-life planning and dying at home. The Irish News likewise published a dedicated article about a Queen's University study examining death literacy across Ireland. The Belfast Telegraph subsequently reported on the findings of that study. The New Indian Express also discusses death literacy in the context of end-of-life decision-making.

There is also scholarly discussion of the concept itself. Rogerson et al. (2026) specifically examine "death literacy: tensions between theory and practice" and describe it as an emerging research area.

The sources therefore include both independent media coverage specifically focused on death literacy and scholarly work examining the concept itself. I believe this goes beyond passing or trivial mentions and provides significant coverage of the subject under the GNG. I therefore believe the article meets the General Notability Guideline and should be kept. Karenthecelebrant (talk) 01:21, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Further to the above, I have since identified additional independent media coverage published in 2025 and 2026. The Hindustan Times, The Hindu and The Week all discussed the concept of death literacy and its role in planning for end-of-life in their coverage of India's first Death Literacy Festival. The Hong Kong-based South China Morning Post subsequently reported on death literacy in relation to end-of-life preparation, advance directives and living funerals, including findings from a 2025 study of death literacy among Hong Kong residents.

These sources, which I have added to the article, provide further examples of substantive discussion of death literacy itself, rather than merely passing references to the term. Karenthecelebrant (talk) 22:30, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• Weak keep - The phenomenon seems notable with sources such as 1 covering it but the page is unscientifically return and definitely needs to be rewritten. _signed, Kvinnen (talk) 22:27, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: @Karenthecelebrant: if you continue using LLM to polish your responses in this discussion, they'll be discarded.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 12:46, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: I have collapsed the AI polished comments. Their existence as AI polished comments casts serious doubts on any statements made that AI has not been used in the article. YMMV. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 17:38, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

  This does not mean that they will necessarily be disregarded. It means that AI polished wording has been removed from view unless "shown" until the eventual closer assesses what the consensus is and whether they are to be considered useful by them. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 17:43, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Suspected AI-generated articles-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:56, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Patriots of the Romanian People

Patriots of the Romanian People (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability. Only sources are non-independent (party site or press releases taken by local press) Strainu (talk) 07:20, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Romania. Shellwood (talk) 08:17, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
• Info - Note on soft closure: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion or merging depending on the nomination, at the end of its 7-day listing.

Logs: 2025-11 ✍️ create

--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:02, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - microscopically small and fringe political party. Has only won only one mayoralty, in a small town of 1,500 people. Bearian (talk) 10:04, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio ^giuliano 12:08, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Albanian–Epirote War (1399–1400)

Albanian–Epirote War (1399–1400) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this is notable enough for a standalone article under WP:GNG. I went through the sources currently cited in the article. The only cited source that directly discusses the 1399–1400 conflict in any detail is Spiro Nika Gjirokastra Despotate and John Zenevisi. It discusses Esau de' Buondelmonti's campaign, his defeat and capture by John Zenevisi, and his subsequent ransom, but does not treat this as a separate war under the name "Albanian–Epirote War". Oliver Jens Schmitt is a broad overview of the Balkans, while the Historical and architectural documentation of buildings Gjirokaster and the University of Johannesburg UJ Research Documentation & Archival Content do not provide significant independent coverage of a distinct war of this name. I also searched for "Albanian–Epirote War (1399–1400)" and obvious variants in English and Albanian, but could not find independent academic or historical sources treating it as a separate war.

I think merging this article into John Zenevisi is the best option, while preserving the relevant information there. FranéRogoz (talk) 11:00, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, Albania, and Greece. FranéRogoz (talk) 11:00, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Harihara Deula

Harihara Deula (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Weichan123 (talk) 09:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Hinduism and India. Weichan123 (talk) 09:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Odisha-related AfD discussions. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 11:37, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Education in Kollam district

Education in Kollam district (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDIRECTORY The page is a directory of different types of colleges in the district Weichan123 (talk) 09:33, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, India, and Kerala. Weichan123 (talk) 09:33, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Education-related AfD discussions. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 11:37, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

List of schools in Ernakulam district

List of schools in Ernakulam district (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDIRECTORY The page is a directory of government, private, unaided, CBSE etc schools. Weichan123 (talk) 09:31, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, India, and Kerala. Weichan123 (talk) 09:31, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:06, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: I am unsure how to view this nomination, while the nom has correctly pointed out WP:NOTDIRECTORY, a lot of these schools have minor notablity, or many on Afd discussions end up on this list. tagging active users in this space User:BhikhariInformer, User:Kelob2678, User: LibStar to provide their views on the subject matter.Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 19:55, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Keep Nothing in WP:NOTDIRECTORY covers lists of schools. The third bullet of the selection criteria (WP:CSC) for lists says, "Short, complete lists of every item that is verifiably a member of the group", which this article satisfies. I also recently had a discussion with experienced editors in India-related topics and they said that lists in places that have many schools should be covered in separately created articles. Kelob2678 (talk) 20:18, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Amal College of Advanced Studies, Nilambur

Amal College of Advanced Studies, Nilambur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Weichan123 (talk) 09:25, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, India, and Kerala. Weichan123 (talk) 09:25, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Jami'a Nooriyya Arabic College

Jami'a Nooriyya Arabic College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Weichan123 (talk) 09:24, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, India, and Kerala. Weichan123 (talk) 09:24, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Islam. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:08, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

MediaOne Academy of Communication

MediaOne Academy of Communication (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Weichan123 (talk) 09:22, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, India, and Kerala. Weichan123 (talk) 09:22, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Education-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:09, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

NSS College, Nenmara

NSS College, Nenmara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Weichan123 (talk) 09:20, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Kerala. Weichan123 (talk) 09:20, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Comment - The article was moved from NSS College, Nenmara to NSS College, Nemmara after this AfD was opened. Iamcarbonmatter ♥ xoxo ✦ 10:01, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Education-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:13, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Sam Proof

Sam Proof (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was written by the subject and relies heavily on their own website for references.

Similarly, the person in question doesn't appear to be particularly notable. Lostsandwich (talk) 09:19, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:13, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

2018 Hassanal Bolkiah Trophy squads

2018 Hassanal Bolkiah Trophy squads (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Squad list for a regional U21 tournament in Southeast Asia. We usually delete regional competition squad lists, especially for youths or other narrowed-down groups of participants, for instance see the following precedences: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. This is a test case for the Hassanal Bolkiah Trophy squads, so if this is deleted the rest can be prodded. Geschichte (talk) 08:56, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Football-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:05, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Singapore, Thailand, and Timor-Leste. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:14, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Desi Bartlett

Desi Bartlett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The majority of this article is unsourced and reads promotional. The few sources that are used include one dead link, a bio on a web design site, and then a few where her name is mentioned. None of the sources really meet WP:SIGCOV. She may have worked with famous people, however, that does not equal notability for a stand-alone article at this time. FiddleheadLady (talk) 01:29, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, and Health and fitness. FiddleheadLady (talk) 01:29, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: United States of America and Hawaii. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 01:31, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:30, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Adoption of the euro in Estonia

Adoption of the euro in Estonia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another article in a series of 'Adoption of the euro in ...' by the same author (now blocked). All articles use the same template, which looks to be generated by an AI. Vgbypw (talk) 08:21, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Suspected AI-generated articles and Estonia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:34, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Adoption of the euro in Greece

Adoption of the euro in Greece (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another article in a series of 'Adoption of the euro in ...' by the same author (now blocked). All articles use the same template, which looks to be generated by an AI. Vgbypw (talk) 08:20, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Suspected AI-generated articles and Greece. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:33, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Nibaran Bora

Nibaran Bora (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL and WP:NAUTHOR. Selective mentions only in Assam Movement related articles, news and books. Searching for a BEFORE I found nothing. NOTE:I myself wanted to create article about the person, but skipped due to lack of Notability to establish. The existing two sources are not reliable as the first source carries only mentions, and the second source is just about book launch which is penned by his own daughter. Dylan Reed (Ping me) 08:08, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Politicians, India, and Assam. Dylan Reed (Ping me) 08:08, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - No sign of notability. LegacyWiki (talk) 17:14, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Keep/ comment: , , and . These are reliable sources that cover him and generate SIGCOV. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 18:29, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

  Source 2 and 3 are trivial mention. Source 1 is not reliable. Dylan Reed (Ping me) 18:55, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Indonesia 9–2 Bangladesh

Indonesia 9–2 Bangladesh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

More matchcruft, failing WP:NOTNEWS, and which will not have a lasting impact in 10-20 years. Geschichte (talk) 07:46, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Delete per rationale of nominator. Servite et contribuere (talk) 08:07, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Drat8sub (talk) 08:17, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Football, Bangladesh, and Indonesia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:30, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete I am also not so hopeful if it will experience lasting coverage. GenuineArt (talk) 12:25, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Achmad Rachmani (talk) 16:48, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Delete — Fails WP:NOTNEWS, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:GNG. Just pure WP:RECENTISM. Publicwalrus (talk) 18:50, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Clear Rivers

Clear Rivers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a case of FANCRUFT. It has a whole host of sources, but pretty much all of them either primary (the films and novelisations), unreliable (like IMDB), about the actress instead of the character, and/or about the film instead of the character (like the reviews). Some sources don't mention Rivers at all.

I can't find enough secondary, independent, and reliable sources to justify a standalone article instead of maybe an extended description in the article about the film. Cortador (talk) 07:15, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Film. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:31, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Honestly delete until someone finds better sources. Other Final Destination characters at least had whole news articles about them to justify their pages. Most of the sources here are just reviews that briefly mention Clear. Bonus Person (talk) 15:00, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Soviet aircraft carrier Baku

Soviet aircraft carrier Baku (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be merged into INS Vikramaditya, which is the same ship but its current name. Our typical practice with ships is to separate the articles only if the vessel had significant service (e.g. in time or events) in multiple navies. In this case, its short Soviet/Russian service means that the topic can be adequately covered under its current Indian Navy name. See also WT:SHIPS#Articles for ships that changed nationalities for related discussion. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 01:34, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Military-related AfD discussions. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 01:34, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related AfD discussions. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:36, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• Support per nom and the discussion here. We don't need 2 articles for the same topic when there isn't sufficient material to justify it. Parsecboy (talk) 10:28, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
• Support per above - not enough material to justify two articles. Llammakey (talk) 12:23, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep as a separate article. That is exactly the "significant service in more than one navy" case. Signahistar (talk) 13:34, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

  @Signahistar: There are two (2) sentences in the article about its Soviet/Russian Navy active service. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 15:23, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

  Fair point. I've added her Soviet and Russian service from Apalkov's Korabli VMF SSSR (vol. II, part 1, 2003), and there's more detail in that source if needed. Signahistar (talk) 16:21, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

  @Signahistar: To me, the new info actually makes for a stronger merging case... I'm just not seeing a need for a separate article that covers:

  • being commissioned in Dec 1987
  • deploying abroad once(?)/taking part in some naval exercises
  • breaking down 4.25 years after being commissioned
  • not being repaired until it was sold to India

  Side note: it's kind of nuts that its boilers wore out that fast, even accounting for the broader state of the country at that time. Thanks for adding that. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 00:18, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep as seperate article. The INS article is already big enough. Segaton (talk) 02:22, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 05:28, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Prince Paul Wossen-Seged Makonnen, Duke of Harar

Prince Paul Wossen-Seged Makonnen, Duke of Harar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet any of Wikipedia's notability criteria. There are no online sources that wrote about him while he was alive. All I see is a brief surge of interest following his death. If he was not notable during his lifetime, why should he be considered notable after his death? RobertVikman (talk) 18:49, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Ethiopia. Shellwood (talk) 18:59, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per our usual outcomes; he was an imperial Prince and Duke of a reigning empire. Once notable, always notable. His advocacy contributes to his notability. Bearian (talk) 18:35, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:52, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 05:18, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Rubén Deicas

Rubén Deicas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm very sure that this fails WP:NSINGER. Deicas had not made at least two notable albums, which convinces me that not only does it meet GNG. By the way, the eswiki article on this also shows that Deicas has not published a single album, but their Spotify profile shows that he has made 2 albums... which are yet to be notable to appear here. — SimpleObjects-9ei 🍂/🌰/🤗 (see talk) 01:39, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Argentina. SimpleObjects-9ei 🍂/🌰/🤗 (see talk) 01:39, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 05:16, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Aero Cuahonte

Aero Cuahonte (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Regional and now-defunct airline, fails general notability criteria scope_creep^Talk 05:01, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Previously proded and deleted.Using the prior rationale. scope_creep^Talk 05:03, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Travel and tourism, Aviation, and Mexico. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 05:05, 4 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - Mentioned in passing my sources but no in-depth coverage. Sources are not reliable or non-independent. Ping me if better sources are found. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 05:58, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

  You can review the sources again, which include government data, journalistic sources, and internationally recognized publications. Kind regards from Néstor Sánchez, if you have something to say, you can contact me. 19:53, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Given that it was an airline with 50 years of operations, as well as the types of aircraft it used and the routes it served, its standing regarding notability criteria should be reconsidered. Kind regards from Néstor Sánchez, if you have something to say, you can contact me. 19:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

In terms of fleet size and area of ​​operation, Aero Cuahonte could have been comparable to airlines such as GLO Airlines, Go! Mokulele, or FlyWhoosh, articles with even less references. Kind regards from Néstor Sánchez, if you have something to say, you can contact me. 20:01, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Kaito Maruyama

Kaito Maruyama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC. Of the listed sources, 1, 4, 5 are short athlete profiles, 2 is a list of quotes, 3 is not independent or secondary, 6 is a medalists list, 7 appears to be press releases. A WP:BEFORE search (this included a search using his japanese name for language results) gives nothing new in terms of WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV. Bungle491 (talk) 02:02, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Tennis, and Japan. Bungle491 (talk) 02:02, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Budhanilkantha School

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Budhanilkantha School
• Articles for deletion/Budhanilkantha School/Cultural traits and quirks
• Articles for deletion/Budhanilkantha School (2nd nomination)

Budhanilkantha School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are not enough independent sources WP:SIGCOV to constitute WP:GNG. I also think the organization is solely based on their Notable Alumni section; I want to make it clear that notability is not inherited, WP:NOTINHERIT. Also, it doesn't qualify for WP:ORG. Nirvana869976 (talk) 21:13, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related AfD discussions. Nirvana869976 (talk) 21:13, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  I would like to request editors to check for in-depth independent sources rather than 2 lines of trivial mentions while making their !vote. Nirvana869976 (talk) 21:17, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Nepal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:16, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:11, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep Covered in this paper. Some controversies. Articles written by alumnis, but published in mainstream Nepali press that treat the school rather critically. Kelob2678 (talk) 20:21, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:06, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Hamid-Reza Ashtianipoor

Hamid-Reza Ashtianipoor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILMMAKER. Found some Iranian news on a quick Google search, but not sure about the reliability of the local sources. Would be happy if someone points out some SIGCOV with RS. Or else, it fails GNG either. Htanaungg (talk) 14:07, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and Iran. Htanaungg (talk) 14:07, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:30, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete – filmography databases and profile pages are not the significant coverage WP:BASIC asks for. Kukuryza (talk) 02:04, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
• Comment He has an entry in Cinema Iranica, but I cannot open the PDF. Kelob2678 (talk) 21:00, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:03, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Quarter Century Wireless Association

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Quarter Century Wireless Association
• Articles for deletion/Quarter Century Wireless Association (2nd nomination)

Quarter Century Wireless Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My source search (regular Google, Google News, and Google Books) only led me to three "arrl.org" sources (the ones in the article), and two books which only mention the name in passing. pattersonuwu ^njz (talk) 01:51, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Organizations. pattersonuwu ^njz (talk) 01:51, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus.

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Thank you for checking. I have been working to improve the article and agree that the key issue is whether there is sufficient significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, rather than the amount of material published by QCWA itself.

There is at least some independent historical coverage beyond the organization’s own website. For example, ARRL published a dedicated article on QCWA’s 75th anniversary that discusses the organization’s founding in 1947, its chapter development, historical membership, and activities. ARRL has also independently documented QCWA’s cooperative relationship with ARRL and other QCWA activities.

I also found a larger historical print record that does not appear to have surfaced in the initial search. The January 1990 issue of WorldRadio contains a substantial article titled “What is QCWA?” discussing the organization’s 1947 formation, its initial organizational meeting, 54 charter members, expansion beyond New York, the establishment of the Cleveland chapter in 1951 and Chicago chapter in 1954, membership growth, and organizational purposes. The October 1995 issue of WorldRadio also contains substantial historical coverage of QCWA’s founding and chapter development, and earlier issues contain additional material concerning the organization’s history and membership.

I recognize that WorldRadio carried a regular QCWA column and that some of that material was written by QCWA members or officers, so I am not suggesting that every item should automatically qualify as independent significant coverage. However, it does show that there is a considerably larger historical print record than is apparent from a standard web search, and I think those archives warrant further review.

There is also historical material in the Proceedings of the Radio Club of America and in RCA’s institutional history, as well as additional ARRL reporting from multiple years concerning QCWA, its leadership, activities, and relationship with the broader amateur-radio community.

Since QCWA was founded in 1947, a significant portion of relevant coverage predates modern web publishing and may exist primarily in archived print publications. I am continuing to search older amateur-radio magazines, books, newspapers, and archival sources, while distinguishing independent secondary coverage from QCWA-authored or affiliated material.

I would appreciate editors taking the historical print record into account before reaching a conclusion.

Qcwa (talk) 02:03, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: this is almost certainly the same subject as the first nomination from 2006 that ended in deletion (and with low participation for that era); obviously the potential sourcing (even for a subject around since 1947) has not improved in 20 years (and this iteration of the article has been around since 2007, not all that long after the first nomination). No opinion at this time. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:43, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

  The 2006 deletion does not establish the outcome of the present discussion. Notability is assessed from the sources available and identified now, and the earlier discussion reportedly had limited participation.

  The assertion that sourcing “obviously” has not improved is also premature. A dedicated ARRL article discusses QCWA’s founding, historical membership, chapter development, and 75th anniversary, while additional print-era coverage has been identified in WorldRadio. QCWA’s historical records also indicate that its historian maintained a collection of older books, papers, photographs, and other materials, some intended for scanning and publication.

  I agree that QCWA-authored records cannot establish notability and that each publication must be evaluated for independence and depth. However, the prior deletion and the article’s age are not substitutes for examining the presently identified sources under WP:GNG, WP:NORG, and WP:BEFORE. The print-era record should be reviewed before concluding that adequate coverage does not exist. Hamradio007 (talk) 03:07, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:44, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Weak keep. From an IA search, there's quite a lot of reporting about QCWA in amateur radio magazines worldwide, sustained over the nearly 80 years it's been around, but it tends to be brief. For example: QST and CQ reported on its first meetings in 1948; very short mention in QST in 1950; Radio Electronics in 1952; RSGB Bulletin in 1961; the book So You Want To Be A Ham in 1968; Popular Electronics in 1980; Radiosporting in 1986. A 1977 editorial in 73 is the most in-depth piece I found. Certainly enough to source its history and growth in membership, and some of the activities it's been involved in -- contributing to development of amateur radio licensing in the US, offering scholarships -- but it'd be nice to see a more in-depth discussion of its history (maybe someone should write one for the anniversary next year!). Adam Sampson (talk) 04:25, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

  Adam, thank you — this was very helpful. I went back through the article and incorporated the archival sources you identified, including the 1948 QST and CQ coverage, the later references in QST, Radio-Electronics, RSGB Bulletin, Popular Electronics, and Radiosporting, Robert Hertzberg’s So You Want to Be a Ham, and the 1977 73 Magazine editorial.

  I also cleaned up the citation formatting so the periodicals are cited as magazine sources rather than books, and added a new Historical coverage section to document the sustained published coverage over the decades.

  Your suggestion to look beyond readily searchable web sources and into the Internet Archive was excellent and materially improved the article. I appreciate you taking the time to do that research and point me toward those sources.Hamradio007 (talk) 05:11, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:03, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Foresight Linux

Foresight Linux (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. There are no independent sources. Most of the content is unsourced. The only independent sources are about its discontinuation Mdggdj (talk) 06:53, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Software. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 07:35, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment: see this thread at the Administrators' noticeboard. Amitie 10g (talk) 13:13, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

That link does not lead to a valid header; this link to that discussion should work (even after it archives). (No opinion on the article.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:15, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep. Although the article lacks of independient source, it has a source from Ars Technica. Lack of independient sources can be resolved by finding sources rather than deleting. Amitie 10g (talk) 19:10, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

That presupposes that such sources exist. Merely implying that they might is not a valid 'keep' rationale. If you wish the article be kept, go find them. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:33, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

If you're talking about Ars Technica, the source is available at Internet Archive. The cite needs to be updated. Amitie 10g (talk) 22:27, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

No, I am referring to the sources that you implied could be found. Sources, plural, as WP:N specifies. Though even an actual verifiable citation to an archived version of the specific Ars Technica article would be a start, given that you are claiming that it may help demonstrate notability. What exactly is preventing you from providing actual citations? AndyTheGrump (talk)

While we certainly prefer that sources be found over deletion when possible, as sources not currently in the article can contribute to notability, we also prefer that we actually know what those sources are over merely suggesting they exist. (No opinion on whether that is the case here.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:18, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. I've actually taken the time to look for sources, and can't really find anything that would meet WP:N. There are brief reviews, but most do little more than describe the very basics of what is after all just another in a multitude of Linux distro's, with little to distinguish them from their contemporaries. We already have List of Linux distributions, and expanding the entry there (which currently doesn't even cite a source, and fails to give any indication of its release and discontinuation dates) would be far more useful to place it in context. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:38, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete – on the Ars Technica source raised above: it is one entry in that site's 2008 year-end Ovatio Awards round-up, an award blurb rather than coverage of the distribution, and the Softpedia link is a shutdown notice. Everything else is the project's own site, the rPath wiki and a Gmane mailing-list post (WP:NSOFT, WP:GNG). Kukuryza (talk) 01:45, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
• Keep Ars Technica is good enough as it contains more than WP:100WORDS on the subject and contains independent analysis. There is also additional coverage, some labeled as reviews. Kelob2678 (talk) 21:14, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

See the note at the top of WP:100WORDS: This page is not an encyclopedia article or a Wikipedia policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community. An obscure essay only edited by a dozen or so contributors is of no real significance here. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:12, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:02, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Weak Keep -- sources found so far (credit to @Kelob2678) are just so-so:

• Softpedia is basically a blog post
• E-week is substantive but not really sustained
• German article is very brief coverage.
• Ars Technica is brief as well.

I found this praising it as the distro was being discontinued. That plus e-week are enough.

So I don't think it needs to be deleted, but the article may lack some WP:Verifiability and needs an update or needs to be cut back. Oblivy (talk) 03:07, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

The author of Softpedia's review wrote more than 10,000 pieces on the site, so I think he is well-established enough, even if the style of writing is blog-like. What about Linux.com? They are not independent from Linux, but independent enough from the distro. Kelob2678 (talk) 07:29, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Python Paste

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Python Paste
• Articles for deletion/Python Paste (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Python Paste (3rd nomination)

Python Paste (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. There are no independent sources. Mdggdj (talk) 07:11, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Internet, and Software. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 07:36, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment: see this thread at the Administrators' noticeboard. Amitie 10g (talk) 13:09, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: this survived the first nomination in 2010, possibly due to the lower standards of the era, but also seemingly based on identified sources that still aren't in the article 16 years later. The second nomination from 2022 was a procedural follow-up to an IP's PROD (which was invalid because of the first nomination), and ended as "no consensus" for attracting no further participation (owing to the prior AfD and its "keep" consensus). Of note, that IP PROD had more-or-less the same rationale as the current nominator, which may be of note with regard to the AN discussion (the prior link to it was invalid); another IP tried a second PROD with more-or-less the same rationale shortly after that second nomination, which was outright declined without any follow-up. That "no consensus" was not enough to resolve the tag for potential NPRODUCT failure in place since 2021. (No opinion on any of this.). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:13, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

  For what it's worth, that link to AN is now invalid and this is the link to the now-closed discussion (suffice it to say the original link is, for now, also functional). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:04, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:52, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:02, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Galle Grid Substation

Galle Grid Substation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As WP:NBUILDING, infrastructure assets have no inherent notability. Sources don't provide significant coverage of subject to meet WP:GNG - they merely mention it in passing rather providing in-depth coverage. Obi2canibe (talk) 12:04, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and Sri Lanka. Obi2canibe (talk) 12:04, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Commenting as author. 1 - Galle Grid Substation is the country's first-ever utility-scale battery energy storage system. 2 - 10MW is huge in Sri Lankan energy industry, we have standalone power plant articles with a much smaller nameplate capacity. 3 - Grid-connected BESS facilities have their own articles on Wikipedia. 4 - Ignoring BESS altogether (and the huge news coverage of Sri Lanka's BESS rollout), the substation is one of approximately 10 that make up the primary backbone of the national grid. Rehman 14:39, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

  You haven't addressed the core issue here - how does this article meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines on notability? Please show how it meets WP:GNG requirement to have "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Obi2canibe (talk) 21:10, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• I've just pulled autopatrolled from Rehman for this article, which the WP:AIREDCAT (since helpfully fixed by @User:Bearcat) suggests is yet another WP:NOLLM violation, after they were previously warned repeatedly about Electricity Generation Lanka. That aside, this article currently cites an uncredited press release, a promotional news article without a byline, and a promotional opinion piece by Gagan Bulathsinghala, a Sri Lankan government official. None of these meet the bar of counting towards the general notability guideline, so I have to !vote to delete. Toadspike [Talk] 13:58, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Comment, I believe this to be AI-generated per the signs mentioned by Toadspike above and my previous interactions with Rehman. The sourcing is also not great and don't show SIGCOV meeting the GNG guidelines. ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:41, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

  Hi Toadspike and Gurkubondinn. I have now updated the article with additional references which highlights the significance of the Galle BESS. I have also courtesy pinged on WT:ENERGY so folks there can shed some light on the significance of grid-connected BESS. I also want to emphasize that this was not created with AI. Cheers, Rehman 15:48, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

  Of the new sources, nearly all have no byline – similar to WP:RSNOI and WP:RSNON, this may indicate that the article was paid or is simply a recycled press release with little to no editorial review or fact-checking. The only one that looks good is . This one has a byline, but it appears to be a one-person outfit with no editorial review , so not an RS. This still leaves us around two sources away from the GNG. Toadspike [Talk] 08:24, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

  Not directly relating to the subject of this AFD, but: Newswire, Newsfirst, Independent, Daily FT, etc, are the largest/leading English-language news providers in Sri Lanka. Why they don't use bylines in their news articles is not something I can comment on. Rehman 11:54, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Suspected AI-generated articles-related AfD discussions. ‑‑gurkubondinn 16:22, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:01, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

List of British Asian artists

List of British Asian artists (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This list is arbitrary and does not pass the notability threshold of WP:NLIST. In the UK, British Asians usually refers to people of subcontinental origin. If you say "he is Asian" to British person, they picture a person of Indian, Pakistani, Sri Lankan or Bangladeshi origin. The category of "British Asian" applied to all of Asia is not reflecting anything that any contemporary British person recognises as a coherent category, which is why, unlike for British Chinese or British Asian (subcontinental) there are no sources that treat "British Asian" (continental) as a category. At the limit, sources which cover artists with origins from the subcontinent, China and further east may exist, though I have never personally seen any.

There is a census category of "British Asian/Asian", which includes the options "Indian/Pakistani/Bangladeshi/Chinese/any other Asian please describe". However, people from West and central Asia do not consistently use this and a separate "Arab" category exists outside of Asian. Turks, Iranians and eastern Russians will usually, though not always, tick "White other" or "any other ethnicity". Boynamedsue (talk) 13:31, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Visual arts, and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 13:34, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Hi there. I'll briefly explain my reasoning for creating the page. I came across the List of Black British artists some months ago while research one project, and, separately, more recently, was exploring the British Asians page to look for info about an Asian artist I had in mind. I noted that the section on arts in the latter page was lacking, and thought that a way in which this section could be enriched, without becoming over long, would be to direct to a stand-alone page. I chose "British Asian" as it is a census term. If folks wanted to make a list or article about British Iranian, British-Russian, artists (or theatre makers, writers, etc etc), then that seems like a splendid idea if separate to the aims of this list/ category. I have added some wording to the top of the list to explain the (imperfect, by many measures, but a definition nonetheless, which accords with census use).

EDIT: in addition, I would note that "British Asian art" or "British Asian artist/s" is legible in an art history context, and as a wider cultural term which does have coherence, to discuss artists/makers of Asian descent. See eg. https://www.london.gov.uk/programmes-strategies/arts-and-culture/commission-diversity-public-realm/london-unseen-heritage-tours-and-trails/london-unseen-meet-our-guides/british-asian-visual-art-post-cool-britannia; https://www.museum.manchester.ac.uk/galleries/south-asia-gallery; https://www.vice.com/en/article/where-are-all-the-british-asian-artists-623/; https://www.ucl.ac.uk/slade/2025/03/11/Chai_Shai_FINAL.pdf; https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/39107/; https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/33853/; https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711436356; https://www.manchesterhive.com/display/9781526128737/9781526128737.00008.xml etc. Medievalfran (talk) 15:09, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back to me. I think the articles you've posted kind of prove my point. All but one of them relate to South Asian communities alone, only this one relates, as I suggested we would find, to both South Asian and East Asian Britons (but not West Asian, Central Asian or Southeast Asians).Boynamedsue (talk) 17:12, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - "British Asian" is a vague term that really isn't defined outside the Office for National Statistics. Looking at the list is seems to be mostly modern/contemporary artists. A better grouping is the article for The Other Story (exhibition). Heavily referenced in this list, but uses the definition Afro-Asian Artists in Post-war Britain. WP:TOOBROAD unless much more time is spent defining this group with RS. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:07, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
• Keep as a navigational list. British Asian is a well-defined category, because this is how these people are classified by the ONS. If the sources separate East Asians and South Asians, then the article can be reworked to reflect this split instead of being deleted. Kelob2678 (talk) 21:40, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:59, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Mingle Media TV Network

Mingle Media TV Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. All of the references are either reviews, PR launderers, or don't mention the company at all. Additionally, it seems that the website itself leads to a gambling company. Nighfidelity (talk) 14:08, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Internet, and Websites. Nighfidelity (talk) 14:08, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Note: The user who created it in 2011, @MMTVN, might be the company themselves. Nighfidelity (talk) 14:10, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: the article is minimally-changed enough since 2011 to lead me to believe the gambling site probably usurped the subject's own expired website (and that the entity is defunct, which is not a reason to delete a notable entity but can help affirm a non-notable subject will remain that way). This has been tagged as a potential GNG failure for a year. (No opinion.). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:08, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Television-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:09, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, IgelRM (talk) 17:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete – the only citation that resolves is an award-nomination announcement on the now-defunct Indie Intertube; the remaining links are a personal blog and the company's own site (WP:NCORP). Kukuryza (talk) 01:46, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:57, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Marguerite Leduc

Marguerite Leduc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to France at the 1960 Winter Olympics#Alpine Skiing because of a lack of WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. The only reference in the article is a database, and nothing elsewhere indicates any notability for this subject. Let'srun (talk) 14:10, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Olympics, and France. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:14, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep or merge into (and create) an article on the Leduc sisters. Leduc was part of a famous family of French skiers, including sisters Thérèse and Anne-Marie (they are the first three sisters to compete in the same Olympic event), that received coverage. Marguerite has some SIGCOV on her own, e.g. Le Dauphine, but merging the three into an article on the sisters is also an option since all three are stubs and known for competing together. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:03, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

  I'm not interested in creating an article about the sisters, but if someone else wants to, go for it (I could see it meeting the GNG). A redirect would preserve page history in the event someone wanted to do that later. Nothing presented here provides enough coverage on its own for a standalone keep, IMO. Let'srun (talk) 16:33, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

  Would you support me writing such an article? BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:36, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

  If it is properly sourced, go for it (as with any topic you want). I haven't done enough research to verify if it would be viable, but it seemingly stands a better chance than as standalone articles. Let'srun (talk) 16:41, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 18:10, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Merge selectively as suggested and as reasonable in these circumstances, to Leduc sisters or the equivalent. Bearian (talk) 18:26, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

  The article would have to be created for a merge result to be possible. In the meantime, redirecting would keep the page history until Beanie or another interested editor creates it. Let'srun (talk) 15:03, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:57, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Johanna Cranitch

Johanna Cranitch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Musician seemingly notable only for a few years' association with The Cranberries. Sources here are primary source Q&A interviews (, , ), a page on a Cranberries fan blog, brief trivial mentions (, , , , ) and sources that don't mention her (, ). I found one review for an EP issued under the name White Prism and one review for a full length album issued under that name, but neither is enough coverage for either or both to be notable under WP:NMUSIC, and thus I don't see a pass for Cranitch under WP:NMUSICIAN or, per the source analysis above, a WP:GNG pass. OK with a redirect to the Cranberries page, where she is mentioned and for which she seems best known. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:21, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Australia. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:21, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment found this staff-written AllMusic bio for White Prism here which together with the two reviews mentioned above hints at notability so that if a standalone page is not agreed then there could be a merge in a paragraph or two at The Cranberries, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:21, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 18:11, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Merge selectively as suggested and as reasonable in these circumstances, to The Cranberries. Bearian (talk) 18:25, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep Found two more reviews from PopMatters. If it is not kept, then redirect, as a merge would be undue. From what I see, none of her non-Cranberries work is notable, but many received a single piece of coverage. Kelob2678 (talk) 22:07, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:56, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Puducherry

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Puducherry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:56, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Tamil Nadu. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:00, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Weak keep per this this this and this. Just borderline enough to save the page. This article's case looks a bit different from the other JNV school articles that have been getting deleted through AfD over the past few weeks. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 11:14, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: for completeness, this previously survived a bundled nomination in 2020, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Doda, which was a 43-article trainwreck that ended as a SNOW "keep". That this one has attracted a "weak keep" opinion, when the other standalone renominations of these Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya have ended in (or are headed for) near-unanimous redirection or deletion, is another reminder of why such massive bundles don't usually fly at AfD. (No opinion on the article.). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:15, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 20:14, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: There are over 600 of these schools, each should not have a separate page, if specific reference to 1-2 schools is notable, they could be included in the main article on Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Ar1201u1 (talk) 08:45, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per Bhikhari Informer. Also, there was a false report of a bomb planted in the school prior to Modi visiting the district. Kelob2678 (talk) 22:21, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:56, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Tap Global Group

Tap Global Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet the notability threshold yet. Only one source can be considered an independent RS with significant coverage (The Standard). Googling didn't bring up better sources. Vgbypw (talk) 07:38, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 10:18, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - Fails WP:NCORP. Routine coverage under WP:CORPTRIV only. SOFILUIZA // COMMS 14:09, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency, Finance, and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:23, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep - they were one, if not first Fintech in EU company to get a Mastercard EU licence for a DTL in Europe - pretty big deal for industry!! ~2026-51072-69 (talk) 08:12, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 20:19, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Weak keep WP:LISTED company and has received coverage that is already cited in the article. ~2026-53159-97 (talk) 13:05, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:55, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Eiravato

Eiravato (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable small (7- to 10-person?) startup company that doesn't meet WP:NORG or WP:GNG. In terms of the general coverage, most of what is offered (and seemingly available based on my own WP:BEFORE) is the type of passing mentions in general tech-industry/start-up outlets about funding/incubation/etc. Several of which are in the article. EG: "of 220 companies that applied for this start-up program, 15 were selected" (chronicle.lu and siliconluxembourg.lu), "several Irish start-ups help with waste management - here's 2" (Irish Examiner), "10 small startups got a grant of €50,000 at a local event - Eirvato was one of them" (luxinnovation.lu), etc. Of the coverage which does deal with the company as a primary topic, it is relatively ROTM business coverage (on funding/etc) similar to what we might expect for any other similar startup: "small company raises enough to pay 6 or 7 people for a year" (Irish Times) or "7-person company closes Blanchardstown office due to slow uptake in Ireland - moving instead to 1-person office in Luxembourg" (TheJournal and Fora.ie), etc. The claims to notability in the "recognition" section are incredibly weak: "company was one of 237 finalists (in 26 categories) that didn't win anything at a niche industry awards do" (GreenAwards.ie), "company was one of 1000+(?) others who applied and were selected for a proprietary label" (solarimpulse.com). The text of the article itself describes an otherwise ROTM small <10-person start-up company. Comparable to millions of such small companies globally. While it is great that the creating COI/SPA editor declared a connection, that doesn't override the fundamental notability concerns. (Frankly this is such a clear case that I'd have PROD'ed. Only that this has seemingly been through AfC....) Guliolopez (talk) 09:25, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Ireland, Luxembourg, and Companies. Guliolopez (talk) 09:29, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

  • Comment (article creator, COI disclosed on my user page — offering one source-focused note and leaving the assessment to uninvolved editors). I'd ask that the sources be weighed individually per WP:SIRS rather than as a group. Three stand apart from the accelerator/listing material, which I agree carries little weight: (1) the Irish Times piece is a full-length, bylined article in a national newspaper devoted solely to the company — it goes beyond the transaction to independently describe the product, target sectors and market context; (2) the Silicon Republic article is a dedicated editorial feature, not a reprinted announcement, selected and written by the outlet's editor with analysis of the company's model and strategic shift; (3) Fora/TheJournal published dedicated reporting on the company's strategic decisions, again with the company as the sole subject. That is multiple pieces of significant coverage, in independent national outlets, across several years — which is the WP:GNG/WP:NCORP threshold, even setting aside every routine item the nominator lists. The Recognition section was intended as verifiable fact, not as a notability claim, and I have no objection to trimming it. If consensus is nonetheless that WP:NCORP is not met today, I'd respectfully ask the closing administrator to consider draftify as an alternative to deletion: the company remains operational and the article can return through AfC if and when deeper coverage exists. ~~~~

  Relaxedindividual (talk) 09:48, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, IgelRM (talk) 22:05, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Lacks coverage required by WP:NCORP, for example, The Irish Times source is about raising funds. The article was likely created with AI assistance. Oppose draftification, as the draft was declined in 2024. Kelob2678 (talk) 22:33, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:54, 4 October 2026 (UTC)