Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
Reports
- ~2026-43740-57 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 139 (Fixed position vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:09, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Warned user. Level 2 Daniel Case (talk) 01:04, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- ZarceMol88 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:54, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Daniel Case (talk) 01:05, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- JitroMandagi1605 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1353 twice in the last 5 minutes (LTA 1353, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:32, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Doesn't look openly disruptive, and they haven't been reverted. Daniel Case (talk) 01:07, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-42188-67 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 547 twice in the last 5 minutes (LTA 547, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:18, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Doesn't seem to be getting reverts or warnings. Daniel Case (talk) 01:20, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-43771-92 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1353 twice in the last 5 minutes (LTA 1353, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:42, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. No reverts or warnings. Daniel Case (talk) 01:21, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
User-reported
- SRO455 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – WP:LTA/DTHD. –LDM2003 talk to me! 20:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- Warned user. Level 1, Daniel Case (talk) 01:25, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-43745-01 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Vandalism past final warning Augmented Seventh (talk) 01:48, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-37477-08 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Nswix (talk) 01:51, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Tornado warning watch dangerous dangerous wind gu (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- TheOfficialJackTagger (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- Bombax46. 7 rounded to the nearest ten (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Likely LTA. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 00:38, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Wait until the user edits. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- Silent-Researcher-Evidence-Based-Credible-Source-Objective (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional and disruptive username. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:33, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Reason: Repeated temporary-account edits are adding unsourced elimination results for episodes whose elimination has not yet aired. This occurred last week, when Aaron Potts's elimination was added before the August 6 broadcast revealed it, and temporary accounts are again adding the unresolved Episode 5 result before next week's episode. Requesting temporary semi-protection or pending-changes protection to prevent continued addition of unaired, unverifiable results. Example: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Project_Runway_season_22&diff=prev&oldid=1368224200 ~2026-43604-12 (talk) 21:33, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Is the concern "unaired and unverifiable" or are these results in fact verifiable (through sources other than the actual episodes,s of course) and the concern spoilers? Because we do not remove information due to the latter. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:57, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection due to persistent vandalism from several temporary user accounts who are changing the subject's birth date. Marchije•speak/peek 22:24, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 00:58, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Thepharoah17 (talk) 23:37, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 00:58, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Tbhotch™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 00:06, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 00:58, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated introduction of disinformation by multiple TAs evidently from the same IP address. Zingarese talk · contribs (please 
mention me on reply; thanks!) 00:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 00:59, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – IPs and now an SPA continuing to add DOB without proper sourcing per WP:BLPPRIVACY. Been slow edit war over the last year but most recently from SPA in the last week, despite warning on their talk page. CNMall41 (talk) 05:01, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 70 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:00, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page-move vandalism – Repeated undiscussed page moves by multiple editors resulting in a move war. Danners430 tweaks made 07:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – the last legitimate edit was nearly a year ago, and theres been quite a bit of vandalism since, including a sockmaster whos been back here 3 times at least. Jackjd0 (talk) 07:37, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 Days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:01, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Danners430 tweaks made 09:46, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 14:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Constant Removal of Monster Inc. and Monsters University from List of Pixar films from Temporary Accounts (User:~2026-43796-32, User:~2026-43432-73 and User:~2026-43366-30). Untamed1910 (talk) 16:07, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 17:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: ~2026-43612-92 (talk · contribs) blocked by Mfield. Epicgenius (talk) 01:13, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting semi-protection due to continued socking after previous protection expired. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:17, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 100 Days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:01, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Reason: High level of disruptive edits: the matter seems to have been raised at WP:ANI but not addressed. Dormskirk (talk) 18:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. In solidarity Wikipedian12512 (Talking is fine | contribs) 18:51, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The last edit was five days ago. I'm also not seeing that the recent edits have been vandalism - if anything, this appears like a sourcing dispute. Epicgenius (talk) 01:12, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. tgeorgescu (talk) 19:23, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:12, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Pov pushing by ip editor similar happening in other articles related to architectures in India like sikh architecture Myuoh kaka roi (talk) 20:10, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/A-I. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 21:01, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Not all articles about Palestenians fall under A-I. Only two paragraps of the "history" section here do; the rest does not fall strictly under PIA. The Bushranger One ping only 23:19, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 22:31, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated unsourced changes by multiple TAs for at least a week. Sigma440 (talk) 23:01, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Epicgenius (talk) 01:10, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism immediately resumed after protection expired aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 23:25, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Epicgenius (talk) 01:09, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Requesting extended-confirmed protection under WP:RUSUKR. The article already implicates and discusses a Ukrainian munitions plane as well as US intelligence sources pointing to Russia. There have been some anonymous edits on the Leipzig/Halle Airport page, including talk page requests to find evidence of [false flag], and deliberate anon edits after giving warning of WP:RUSUKR topic. Lacanic (talk) 00:31, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Controversial topic (fan suicide), repeat vandalism Hello9035 (talk) 01:09, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. AriuCH (talk) 01:13, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:28, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow-motion sock warring over the past week. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 01:34, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Reason: Page has been protected for over 15 years with barely any vandalism, and most if not all of the edit requests by TA's and IP's are constructive, so there is no real reason for the page to be semi-protected anymore. MathMan4 (talk) 03:35, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) This is a high-traffic page (over 5,000 daily page views in the past month) with a long history of vandalism prior to the protection, so if WP:TRYUNPROT is attempted at all, indef PCP seems the safest move. Entranced98 (talk) 08:23, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment)
barely any vandalism
isn't a valid reason for unprotection per the notice above. Recommend pending changes instead full unprotection per Entranced98. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 16:10, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
I request the following sentence be removed from the lead's 2nd paragraph:
"and subsequently annexing the Strait of Hormuz"
This sentence was recently added but is completely unsourced, not in the body, and POV pushing. Although Iran has claimed sovereignty over the strait, there are no sources claiming that it has actually successfully annexed it during the ongoing war or even attempted officially to do so. The linked page on sovereignty in the text which is a new page created by the same user also doesn't even support this wording of annexation. Current talks between Iran and Oman are about shared administration as well, not annexation. ~2026-43592-81 (talk) 07:20, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Replace X "misogynistic and/or racist commentary" with Y "misogynistic and racist commentary." so that the page complies with MOS:ANDOR guidelines. This edit should be uncontroversial, the text is not a quote, there does not appear to be any important "not both" edge case that the author was trying to address, it seems to be only a lack of awareness of guidlines such as MOS:ANDOR as well as MOS:SLASH. -- ~2026-37849-52 (talk) 23:47, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 4 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 12:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) |
| 37 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 00:04, 9 August 2026 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
I have created 35+ articles and intend to continue creating more. I believe my article creation history demonstrates familiarity with Wikipedia's content and sourcing policies, and so I am requesting the autopatrolled right to help reduce workload for New Pages Patrol.LivingLife1976 (talk) 11:25, 1 August 2026 (UTC) LivingLife1976 (talk) 11:25, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Hi! I'm here to request permanent autopatrolled rights. I was previously granted a 2-month temporary autopatrolled right back in June, but the period will end on August 11th. In total, I've created over 130 articles for Wikipedia with a focus on biographies of underrepresented individuals, including 10 DYKs, and have brought two articles to GA status. I've also been quite active in the Articles for Deletion procedure and in GA reviewing. I've grown quite familiar with the process of article creation on Wikipedia, and plan to continue creating more articles, so I'd love to get permanent autopatrolled rights. Thank you! Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 20:40, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
Would like to use when I get my computer back, will use to do edits that if done manually would be tedious. Beta Beta Beta - talk 22:06, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
I would like to create navigation templates for groups of related articles that currently lack them and use AWB to add those templates where appropriate. I have not created navigation templates before, but I am familiar with Wikipedia’s policies and would take care to review my work and ensure edits are appropriate. I understand if more experience with this type of maintenance work is needed before being granted the permission. If granted, I would use AWB carefully and review each edit before saving. Mascius (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Hi there, I would like to use AWB to help speed up edits replacing the deprecated
I already have some experience with making changes using semi-automatic tools (and even my automatic bot) I build myself with PyWikiBot, but it would be a lot easier if I didn't have to write an entire program each time I want to make new edits. I would use AWB to help me add add navboxes I create to various pages in a category, fix duplicated and deprecated parameters in templates, and test AWB scripts that I may submit BRFAs for as FlammableBot tasks in the future. FlammablePizza (talk) 23:32, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Hello! I recently saw this tool pop while looking at my watchlist and I decided I kind of need this. I make articles and heavily expand articles during my pasttime, and sometimes wrong grammar slips by whenever I make/edit these articles. One of the hardest ones to spot are the typos and double letters. I would mostly use the AWB just so I could check the grammar on the articles I've edited and some others as well. This is just so that not another editor has to fix a typo I made for some time ago. If you would like some more information, I would happily oblige. (Here are my edits statistics btw) DoNothingEveryday (talk) 09:08, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights I want to Mainly use the pywikibot to create lists. and only very rarely maybe create articles. Wikiguythatlikesbiology (talk) 20:51, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed
Reason for requesting confirmed rights Ultracrepidate (talk) 11:08, 8 August 2026 (UTC) |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
Hi! I'd like to request the New Page Reviewer user right to help reduce the backlog. I have experience with page creations, having created or converted from redirect 122 pages. I've also promoted two articles to WP:GAs, and am frequently active in DYK, in AfD and in GANRs. Jishara (talk) 12:23, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
I previously held the temporary New Page Reviewer permissions for one month, which has now expired. During this time, I used the Page Curation tool to review articles and drafts according to Wikipedia's policies. Since my temporary right has expired, I would like to request full restoration of my permission,so that I may continue to help the community with the backlog. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 16:37, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Currently serving as an AFC reviewer and actively reviewing drafts. I am active in checking newly created article under Wikiproject India. I would love to join in the squad and help reducing the long backlog by reviewing newly created article. Open to answer any questions . Thanks Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 15:12, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
I understand that New Page Review requires careful judgment. I take a conservative approach to editing and only make decisions when I am confident, supported by wiki guidelines. When I am uncertain, I refer to the relevant guidelines and review past discussions before taking action. I recognise that there is always more to learn and am committed to continuing to improve. I would appreciate the opportunity to help reduce the backlog while applying these principles. Lordofhunter (talk) 19:52, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Hey everyone, I improved very much and think i am now a candidate for NPP. I think i fulfil all the requirements for NPP Abdullah1099 (talk) 05:09, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Hi, my 1 month trial is expiring soon and I'd like to continue reviewing. Azyrii (talk) 17:27, 6 August 2026 (UTC) |
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
I am requesting the page mover right to assist with technical page moves, resolving improper moves, and cleaning up title redirects (such as at WP:RM/TR) without needing to tag pages for speedy deletion. Note regarding cross-wiki history: I had a past block on Wikimedia Commons due to image copyright/licensing issues, but I am not currently blocked on any project and my English Wikipedia account is in good standing. The permission will be used strictly for local article title maintenance and naming convention compliance. Elison Pokhrel TALK 14:12, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
I am requesting the pending changes reviewer permission to assist with maintaining the quality of articles on English Wikipedia. My contributions have primarily focused on expanding and improving articles by adding reliable, independent sources, improving references, and organizing content in accordance with Wikipedia's content policies. 0ximjub43r (talk) 22:12, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
I am familiar with Wikipedia and its guidelines; occasionally come across pending changes I'd like to review. MSWS (talk) 03:18, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights I would like to be able to review edits that are on pending changes pages, as well as unprotected pages. I have 900 edits now, which a good number of them are anti-vandal edits. I also feel that I have a good knowledge on Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I feel I could use that knowledge on pending changes pages as well as unprotected pages. MathMan4 (talk) 06:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
I would like to review pending changes encountered during recent edits patrol. I am familiar with Wikipedia's content policies. Mascius (talk) 18:28, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
In my recent changes patrols, I semi-frequently come across pending changes. If the changes are vandalism, I revert them, but I would also like the ability to accept good pending changes while I'm at it. I already have rollback, extended confirmed, and over 1.6k edits. I also have read and am familiar with the relevant policies. FlammablePizza (talk) 21:20, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
I would like to have pending changes reviewer rights, because I occasionally come across pending changes that I am interested in accepting/not accepting on the recent changes page. I have experience with the necessary policies from actions like patrolling recent changes, writing articles that go through the AfC process to get accepted, and DyK and GA participation. Bungle491 (talk) 19:54, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
I have made a few thousand edits now, many of which are in blp/ antivandalism, and i very regularly see pending changes that i feel i have the skills and knowledge to appropriately approve or deny, and generally think this is a good way i can continue to help contribute to wikipedia. i have read the relevant guidelines and feel my experience applies pretty directly to evaluating all the criteria except copyright, but i am more than willing and able to learn and have been reading up on the copyright policies in advance of sending this request. Jackjd0 (talk) 20:02, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
I would like to request Rollback rights. My last request was on 18 May. According to previous advice, I have tried to follow a clear workflow, including issuing warnings and reporting Vandalism, Block evasion, and Disruptive editing at AIV, RFPP, and AN/EW. In addition, I use Twinkle for warnings, reports, and reverts. AriuCH (talk) 18:27, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
I've recently been using SWViewer and Twinkle to revert vandalism, so this permission would be very useful for me. I'm already very familiar with how it works, as I already have this permission on other Wikimedia projects. -- 🐦🔥 Aws 💬 Talk 14:23, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
I would like to request Rollback permissions firstly in order to make use of tools like Huggle & AntiVandal. Secondly rollback permissions will allow me to increase the speed of my workflow as most of it consists of RC patrolling edits by unregistered & new accounts. My contribution history demonstrates that I have multiple months of RC Patrol experience and no history of edit warring. At the time of writing this I have 656 live edits of which 220 are in the Main namespace and 262 are in the User Talk namespace, this shows my track record of consistently notifying editors when reverting their edits. Vydrakk (talk) 10:03, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
I would like to request my Rollback rights. My previous request on June 15 was declined because I was blocked for making disruptive edits. Since I'm autoconfirmed, I use Twinkle to revert the edits which was vandalized by the IPs (or later TAs). Thomasfan1916[built buses?] 20:15, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting permanent rollback rights after a 1 month trial in the past, as well as my recent 3 month trial. Over the course of the past few months, I have served as a CVUA instructor, and have continued using antivandalism tools like Wikishield and CVPI to prevent vandalism from infecting the wiki. 「Norellia.sh」(talk) 08:29, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
I would like to request rollback rights. I check the recent changes page a couple times a day and I use Twinkle currently to revert vandalism. I have over 200 mainspace edits as well as extended-confirmed permissions. I always use warning templates after reverting edits and make reports to AIV when necessary. Rollback would help me look through recent changes much more effectively with tools such as Interceptor or WikiShield. If not permanent, a month-long trial run of rollback would also work, so that I could reapply eventually. Bungle491 (talk) 06:27, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
I have antivandalism experience and I am requesting rollback permissions to be better equipped to fight vandals. My track record shows that I'm good at differentiating between vandalism and good faith edits, and responding accordingly. - Otherwise (Talk?) 02:50, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights I have 900 edits now, which a lot of them are reverting vandalism and ensuring pages follow Wikipedia's quality guidelines. I feel that being able to rollback pages/edits will help me ensure that Wikipedia's quality standards are being met, especially when a user has made multiple poor-quality edits. MathMan4 (talk) 05:57, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights, I mainly edit reality shows and there are constantly fan edits. I have to revert in most cases to stable one but it unfortunately also includes some good edits. Overall, extra hard work. Rollback will definitely help me. :) Tenshi Uisu (talk) 16:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Been on wp for almost a year now with 5000 edits, already use Twinkle on a regular basis and would be useful when I'm reviewing pages. Fortek67 (talk) 12:13, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
I would like to request rollback rights as it will help me fight vandalism. I currently use Twinkle and I would like to use tools such as CVPI to revert vandalism quicker. Alpha Beta Delta Lambda (talk) 22:00, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Articles are often subjected to persistent vandalism by unregistered IP users or even newly registered users. Such edits are frequently spotted while patrolling recent changes. Reverting these edits using the Twinkle gadget is quite cumbersome. I know when to use rollback. Mathew D'Marco (talk) 17:33, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting the rollback permission to help efficiently revert blatant vandalism and construct history fixes. I understand that rollback is only for clear vandalism and not for content disputes. Elison Pokhrel TALK 14:52, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
I have done a lot of anti-vandalism work in recent weeks but have been frustrated by my inability to be able to restore a previous version due to conflicting errors after vandalism. I consistently notify users and reply to their messages, and try to assist them and tell them what they have done wrong. I understand the uses of this tool and how it is not for content disputes, and I would use this tool responsibly. I have taken feedback from my last request, and I believe I am now in a place to apply. Thanks for your consideration. Equivalent-Text2598 (talk) 22:39, 8 August 2026 (UTC) |
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor
I recently possessed the template editor right, but it expired on July 1. I would like to request permanent template editor rights. I have met all the criteria for granting. I also am willing to prove I can be responsible again with possessing the template editor right permanently. CharlesEditor23 (talk) 05:13, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
Hello! My bot CutlassBot is applying the {{Deprecated archive}} template (recently protected). I’d like template editor permission while the bot is doing its run to apply the template so that I can handle any issues that come up for example, I have one change request pending at Module talk:Deprecated archive. I don’t intend to change any other high risk templates during this run. This is my first template so I don’t meet the guideline criteria. Alternatively, maybe we remove the protection from the module, but I think it’s lower risk to grant me the editor privileges for 3 months. Thanks for considering! Dw31415 (talk) 07:27, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for temporary account IP viewer |
|---|
Temporary account IP viewer
I (like everyone else here) would like to request TAIV for anti-vandal work! I deal with a lot of vandalism, and would like to be able to identify socks better. WikipediholicRat (talk) 23:56, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Requesting temp account IP viewer for anti-vandalism work. I have read all guidelines and will not share IPs publicly. I have experience dealing with vandalism and other disruption. Tumbuka Arch (talk) 17:54, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
I am pretty experienced with SPIs, something that has been acknowledged by fellow editors before, and I believe TAIV could be a helpfull tool for the future. I have been informed about the rights and responsibilities that come with it. Piccco (talk) 21:22, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Requesting for anti-vandalism work and occasional SPI work when I spot suspicious activity in recent changes. I have carefully read the WP:TAIV policy closely and fully understand when to use the tool granted by this permission. The person who loves reading (talk) 01:06, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
I'm requesting the TAIV account permission in order to better patrol recent changes for my counter-vandalism work and for making more informational reports to admin noticeboards and/or SPI. I've read the policy guidelines on this permission both here and on the Foundation website and agree to use this right in accordance with said policies. Sigma440 (talk) 23:10, 8 August 2026 (UTC) |
Usage
{{Admin dashboard/header}}
{{Admin dashboard/ab}}
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}}
{{Admin dashboard/csd}}
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}}
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}|
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}|
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}|
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showawb|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showawb}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}|
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showevco}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}|
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}|
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}|
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}|
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}|
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}|
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }}{{#if:{{{showtaiv|}}}|
{{!}} showtaiv {{=}} {{{showtaiv}}} }}
}}
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|no}}}}}<!--
You can re-arrange the order or pick and choose by transcluding elements separately -->
Note that directly transcluding the template or using all the subtemplates above can cause the page to exceed the post-expand include size.
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time. | String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show temporary account IP viewer | showtaiv | Allows hiding the requests for temporary account IP viewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |