Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Talk:Rebecca Chambers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 hours ago by TheBrickGraphic in topic GA review
Former good articleRebecca Chambers was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 22, 2008Articles for deletionKept
June 6, 2022Good article nomineeListed
January 27, 2025Articles for deletionMerged
August 16, 2026Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
Current status: Delisted good article

undated comment

[edit]

Let me Build it first I just Created it.!—Preceding unsigned comment added by Smalln (talk • contribs)

Copy edit

[edit]

@Boneless Pizza! Hello! I have done a preliminary copy edit on the lead. The filing editor wanted it for GAN. I can see that it is already nominated whilst I am doing the copy edit. According to the rules, and to prevent edit conflicts, please withdraw the GAN until I am done, which would be really soon. Alternatively, you can wait until I finish, but please be aware that the reviewed version may not be the best version, as I see potential issues. I will also leave valuable GAN tips here and in hidden comments, so I recommend you withdraw the GAN. Thank you for your attention.


Sincerely,

16dvnk (talk) 08:05, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

hi @16dvnk I will withdraw my copyedit request instead given that you are not experienced enough. thank you 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 09:00, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. 16dvnk (talk) 09:12, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
You may revert my edits if needed. 16dvnk (talk) 09:12, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

GA review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Rebecca Chambers/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Boneless Pizza! (talk · contribs) 00:25, 20 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: TheBrickGraphic (talk · contribs) 21:59, 3 October 2026 (UTC)Reply


Hi, I'll take this on! Disclaimer that, while I have gotten one to GA myself, I have limited expertise with character articles, so apologies if I make any mistakes. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 21:59, 3 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Lead

[edit]
  • Rebecca has received mostly positive reviews from video game publications, with some critics praising her for being a formidable female character who does not conform to stereotypical gender norms. Something about describing a character as receiving "positive reviews" feels off to me. I'd reword the sentence to something like -> "Rebecca's characterization has received praise from video game publications, with some critics interpreting her as a formidable woman not conforming with sterotypical gender norms."

Concept and Design

[edit]
  • "After a lengthy absence from the media franchise, Rebecca returned to a major role in the 2017 animated film Resident Evil: Vendetta.". I'd cut the word "media" and "2017" so that the latter can be re-formatted into parentheses.
  • "Jill Valentine was originally considered for the role, but her intervening history was considered difficult to accommodate..." What does "intervening history" mean in this context? Does it refer to continuity errors?
  • "In the 2002 title Resident Evil, she was voiced by English actress Hope Levy and Ami Koshimizu in Japanese." I'd reword the first clause as "In the 2002 remake" and move the sentence to the end of the last paragraph, since the 2002 game is iterative of the 1996 one.
  • "Her likeness for Resident Evil 0..." Resident Evil 0 -> Resident Evil Zero. I know both are valid, but the rest of the article uses the latter.

Appearances

[edit]
  • "Canonically, Rebecca is ultimately rescued by Chris and the Alpha Team, and she emerges as Bravo Team's sole survivor of the incident in the canon version of the story." Replace "canonically" with "in the canon version of the story", since this is redundant.
  • "She has survived the events of Resident Evil 2 (1998), in which the character makes an Easter egg–type cameo appearance in an undeveloped film on Wesker's desk." I'd reword the first clause -> "She is confirmed to have survived the events of Resident Evil 2 (1998)..."
  • "She also appears in the sequel, Resident Evil: Death Island." When did it release?