Talk:Graphic statics
Add topicLatest comment: 9 months ago by Викидим in topic Likely AI-generated edits
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ochsendorf and Block
[edit]Are Ochsendorf and Block relevant at the same level as Culmann? If yes, it would be nice to see WP:INDEPENDENT sources saying so. Викидим (talk) 22:25, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Three weeks without independent sources. Removing the claims. Викидим (talk) 01:34, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Likely AI-generated edits
[edit]Hi - I added the AI generated tag here, as the additions by S2595 show strong indications of possible LLM output, and thus need review for accuracy, tone, sourcing problems, etc. Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing to this issue. The edit is definitely AI generated and broken. Text is AI generated per gptzero. I have tested the first three references in the added section ("Digital Adaptations of Graphic Statics"). The first one does not exist, the second contains just a trivial mention of the subject, the third one does not contain anything related to graphic statics at all. Additional checks look like a waste of time, so I am removing all the text. Colleague @S2595: if you would like to retell the story, please open a discussion on this (talk) page first. Викидим (talk) 06:22, 19 October 2025 (UTC)