Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/HWY Cup/Rcsprinter123
| Participant | Content | Media | RJL | Project | Bonus | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 212.994 | 762.147 | 31.757 | 0 | 125.000 | 1,131.898 | |
| 0 | 1,028.990 | 0 | 0 | 75.000 | 1,103.990 | |
| 12.768 | 487.646 | 156.373 | 69.332 | 90.000 | 816.119 | |
| 144.720 | 125.373 | 0 | 30.135 | 15.000 | 315.228 |
Round 3 of the HWY Cup is over, and submissions are closed! Thank you to everyone for participating. Final scores and winner will be announced within next few hours... –TCN7JM
Round 3
[edit]Submissions are closed!
Content creation
[edit]Media
[edit]KMLs |
|---|
Ooookay, so I haven't accepted a couple of these yet because there are mileages given that are not confirmed in the article. I let one of them slide because using the mileage given in the article only cost you a thousandth of a point, but I can't award anything until I know where these mileages are coming from. TCN7JM 23:29, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
|
- Template:Attached KML/U.S. Route 6 in Colorado - KML file 467.284 miles 100^7 - (20.691pts) ✗ +0 (This KML is incorrect. It shows US 6 following I-70 where it doesn't. The most egregious error to me is in the Denver metro but there are some errors in western Colorado as well.)
- Fixed now; I remember doing the Denver area correctly before but for some reason it still followed I-70, and the western CO parts are remedied too. Rcsprinter123 (orate) @ 16:30, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- A lot of western Colorado is still following I-70 where it shouldn't be. Still incorrect. TCN7JM 23:29, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- I'll check again but are you sure you're zooming in far enough? Rcsprinter123 (constabulary) @ 06:00, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm sure. TCN7JM 06:27, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
- OK, updated again. I really think it's entirely correct this time. Rcsprinter123 (chinwag) @ 17:40, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
- Looks good to me.
+20.691 TCN7JM 06:33, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Looks good to me.
- OK, updated again. I really think it's entirely correct this time. Rcsprinter123 (chinwag) @ 17:40, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm sure. TCN7JM 06:27, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
- I'll check again but are you sure you're zooming in far enough? Rcsprinter123 (constabulary) @ 06:00, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
- A lot of western Colorado is still following I-70 where it shouldn't be. Still incorrect. TCN7JM 23:29, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- Fixed now; I remember doing the Denver area correctly before but for some reason it still followed I-70, and the western CO parts are remedied too. Rcsprinter123 (orate) @ 16:30, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Attached KML/A2 road (Northern Ireland) - KML file 239 miles - (11.56pts)
+11.560 - Template:Attached KML/U.S. Route 24 in Colorado - KML file 323.24 miles - (14.930pts)
+14.930 - Template:Attached KML/U.S. Route 29 in the District of Columbia - KML file 8.6 miles - (2pts)
+2 - Template:Attached KML/U.S. Route 56 - KML file 640 miles - (27.6pts)
+27.600 - Template:Attached KML/U.S. Route 64 in Oklahoma - KML file 591.17 miles - (25.647pts)
+25.647 (I was actually going to do this one because I helped write the article, but I never got around to finishing it. Thanks.) - Template:Attached KML/U.S. Route 91 - KML file 172.663 miles - (6.907pts)
+6.907 - Template:Attached KML/U.S. Route 97 in Oregon - KML file 289.31 miles - (13.572pts)
+13.572 - Template:Attached KML/U.S. Route 97 in Washington - KML file 321.62 miles - (14.865pts)
+14.865 - Template:Attached KML/U.S. Route 160 - KML file 1465 miles - (60.6pts)
+60.600 - Template:Attached KML/U.S. Route 166 - KML file 166 miles - (6.64pts)
+6.640 - Template:Attached KML/U.S. Route 177 - KML file 233 miles - (11.32pts)
+11.320 - Template:Attached KML/U.S. Route 283 - KML file 730 miles - (31.2pts)
+31.200 - Template:Attached KML/U.S. Route 641 - KML file 132 miles - (5.28pts)
+5.280 - Template:Attached KML/New Mexico State Road 204 - KML file 11.3 miles - (2pts)
+2 - Template:Attached KML/Oklahoma State Highway 66 - KML file 192.7 miles - (7.708pts)
+7.708 - Template:Attached KML/North Dakota Highway 4 - KML file 10.1 miles - (2pts)
+2 - Template:Attached KML/South Dakota Highway 244 - KML file 10.457 miles - (2pts)
+2 (Huh...did I add the KML template two years ago without actually making the KML? Weird.) - Template:Attached KML/Minnesota State Highway 175 - KML file 21.2 miles - (2pts)
+2 - Template:Attached KML/K-15 (Kansas highway) - KML file 206 miles - (10.24pts)
+10.240 - Template:Attached KML/Ohio State Route 48 - KML file 83.04 miles - (3.322pts)
+3.322 - Template:Attached KML/Missouri Route 30 - KML file 59 miles - (2.36pts)
+2.360 - Template:Attached KML/Missouri Route 96 - KML file 52 miles - (2.08pts)
+2.08 - Template:Attached KML/Missouri Route 100 - KML file 121 miles - (4.84pts)
+4.840 - Template:Attached KML/Missouri Route 366 - KML file 12 miles - (2pts)
+2 - Template:Attached KML/Quebec Route 117 - KML file 410.7 miles - (18.428pts)
+18.428 - Template:Attached KML/Quebec Route 185 - KML file 62.7 miles - (2.508pts)
+2.508 - Template:Attached KML/New Brunswick Route 2 - KML file 322.718 miles - (14.909pts)
+14.909 - Template:Attached KML/Alberta Highway 1 - KML file 331.812 miles - (15.272pts)
+15.272 - Template:Attached KML/British Columbia Highway 1 - KML file 650.762 miles - (28.030pts)
+28.030 - Template:Attached KML/Saskatchewan Highway 1 - KML file 404.6 miles - (18.184pts)
+18.184 - Template:Attached KML/Saskatchewan Highway 2 - KML file 503 miles - (22.12pts)
+22.120 - Template:Attached KML/Saskatchewan Highway 3 - KML file 382 miles - (17.28pts)
+17.280 - Template:Attached KML/Saskatchewan Highway 4 - KML file 407 miles - (18.28pts)
+18.280 - Template:Attached KML/Saskatchewan Highway 5 - KML file 244 miles - (11.76pts)
+11.760 - Template:Attached KML/Saskatchewan Highway 6 - KML file 322.119 miles - (14.885pts)
+14.884 (-0.001) - Template:Attached KML/Saskatchewan Highway 7 - KML file 163.2 miles - (6.528pts)
+6.528 - Template:Attached KML/Saskatchewan Highway 8 - KML file 254.8 miles - (12.192pts)
+12.192 - Template:Attached KML/Saskatchewan Highway 9 - KML file 376.7 miles - (17.068pts)
+17.068 - Template:Attached KML/Saskatchewan Highway 10 - KML file 136 miles - (5.44pts)
+5.440 - Template:Attached KML/Saskatchewan Highway 11 - KML file 252 miles - (12.08pts)
+12.080 - Template:Attached KML/Saskatchewan Highway 13 - KML file 420 miles - (18.8pts)
+18.800 - Template:Attached KML/Saskatchewan Highway 14 - KML file 162 miles - (6.48pts)
+6.480 - Template:Attached KML/Saskatchewan Highway 20 - KML file 189.8 miles - (7.592pts)
+7.592 - Template:Attached KML/Saskatchewan Highway 39 - KML file 168.3 miles - (6.732pts)
+6.732 - Template:Attached KML/Saskatchewan Highway 57 - KML file 11.992 miles - (2pts)
+2 - Template:Attached KML/Saskatchewan Highway 80 - KML file 41 miles - (2pts)
+2 - Template:Attached KML/Saskatchewan Highway 99 - KML file 14 miles - (2pts)
+2 - Template:Attached KML/Saskatchewan Highway 106 - KML file 203 miles - (10.12pts)
+10.120 - Template:Attached KML/Montana Highway 1 - KML file 64 miles - (2.56pts)
+2.560 - Template:Attached KML/Montana Highway 2 - KML file 63 miles - (2.52pts)
+2.520 - Template:Attached KML/Montana Highway 5 - KML file 67.4 miles - (2.696pts)
+2.696 - Template:Attached KML/Montana Highway 7 - KML file 80.585 miles - (3.223pts)
+3.223 - Template:Attached KML/Montana Highway 16 - KML file 152.371 miles - (6.095pts)
+6.095 - Template:Attached KML/Montana Highway 25 - KML file 5.903 miles - (2pts)
+2 - Template:Attached KML/Montana Highway 37 - KML file 67.048 miles - (2.682pts)
+2.682 - Template:Attached KML/Montana Highway 40 - KML file 7.208 miles - (2pts)
+2 - Template:Attached KML/Montana Highway 42 - KML file 2.92 miles - (2pts)
+2 - Template:Attached KML/Montana Highway 49 - KML file 12 miles - (2pts)
+2 - Template:Attached KML/Montana Highway 55 - KML file 12.055 miles - (2pts)
+2 - Template:Attached KML/Montana Highway 64 - KML file 8.886 miles - (2pts)
+2 - Template:Attached KML/Montana Highway 72 - KML file 21.002 miles - (2pts)
+2 - Template:Attached KML/Montana Highway 80 - KML file 62 miles - (2.48pts)
+2.480 - Template:Attached KML/Montana Highway 81 - KML file 42.378 miles - (2pts)
+2 - Template:Attached KML/Montana Highway 83 - KML file 91.093 miles - (3.644pts)
+3.644 - Template:Attached KML/Montana Highway 84 - KML file 28.832 miles - (2pts)
+2 - Template:Attached KML/Montana Highway 85 - KML file 6.835 miles - (2pts)
+2 - Template:Attached KML/Montana Highway 86 - KML file 37.407 miles - (2pts)
+2 - Template:Attached KML/Montana Secondary Highway 323 - KML file 71.023 miles - (2.841pts)
+2.841 - Template:Attached KML/Montana Secondary Highway 326 - KML file 1.74 miles - (2pts)
+2 - Template:Attached KML/Theodore Roosevelt Expressway - Only claiming for U.S. 2 section as rest is imported; 37.34 miles - (2pts)
+2
Project participation
[edit]Bonuses
[edit]- 20 KML files over 100 miles.
+75 (US 6 is still wrong but there were other long-enough ones that were correct after you stopped counting.)
Challenges
[edit]- I have to contest Ontario Highway 7, as it is missing the first 95.8 miles of the route and incorrectly shows a discontinued portion as part of the highway. I'm happy to withdraw this challenge if the KML is fixed. - Floydian τ ¢ 03:03, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- Is it correct now? Rcsprinter123 (lecture) @ 07:48, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- Good enough for Canadians ;) I'll make the minor fix and add the former sections as I normally do. Challenge respectfully withdrawn. - Floydian τ ¢ 08:04, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- I would like to co-challenge Template:Attached KML/U.S. Route 6 with Floydian. Once the individual state KMLs are made, it's literally no work to compile them into one large file. So, we think getting points for the state-detail article KML and the main KML is double dipping. Now, speaking for myself here, if all of the US 6 state-detail articles had not been not created, I would have no problem with the main KML claiming points for the state(s) without state-detail articles. –Fredddie™ 21:30, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Floydian: Please confirm that you are challenging this as well. TCN7JM 21:34, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah I can't disagree with what Fredddie is saying. I'm sure it was done in good faith, but I think it's at least under the same mantra as maps losing points if the KML is already made. RCS has informed me by email that he is currently away for a week, so I don't believe we'll see any response until next weekend. - Floydian τ ¢ 05:13, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- I must side with Fredddie and Floydian here. I also agree that it was probably done in good faith, and there's absolutely nothing wrong with creating the KML for the whole route; I just don't think it should be claimed for points. Looking closer into this, I realized that Rcsprinter also did this with the KML(s) for U.S. Route 1 in Round 2. Had I noticed it the first time, I would have warned against doing it again. However, that is moot as A) Rcsprinter is already in Round 3, and B) he would have made Round 3 without the extra points from the KML "double dip" regardless. 15 points each to Fredddie and Floydian for the successful challenge. TCN7JM 05:05, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- (P.S., don't bother claiming the challenge as a submission. I'll just tack it on when I'm done here. TCN7JM 05:07, 13 August 2014 (UTC))
- Yeah I can't disagree with what Fredddie is saying. I'm sure it was done in good faith, but I think it's at least under the same mantra as maps losing points if the KML is already made. RCS has informed me by email that he is currently away for a week, so I don't believe we'll see any response until next weekend. - Floydian τ ¢ 05:13, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Floydian: Please confirm that you are challenging this as well. TCN7JM 21:34, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Round 2
[edit]Round 2 | 377.160 points |
|---|
Content creation[edit]Media[edit]
You seem to have added an extra two points to all of your KML submissions. The two-point bonus only happens at 200 miles (320 km).
RJL conversions[edit]Project participation[edit]Bonuses[edit] |
Round 1
[edit]Round 1 | 153 points |
|---|
Content creation[edit]Media[edit]
Project participation[edit]Bonuses[edit] |