Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/Assessment/A-Class Review/2016

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

U.S. Route 25 in Michigan

The article was promoted to A-Class. –Fredddie™ 22:40, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

• Featured article candidates/U.S. Route 25 in Michigan/archive1

U.S. Route 25 in Michigan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) review

Suggestion: Promote to A-Class

Nominator's comments: I've got a request for a map in place, but it It has been suggested that this article is FAC-able in the near future. I'd like a review here to prep it for a nomination.

Nominated by: Imzadi 1979 → 13:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

First comment occurred: 22:12, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

First of all, some housekeeping: I don't think that Imzadi1979 will be proceeding with the full length of the review before a FAC due to the low activity levels across the project, so this is structured more like a peer review and I don't expect responses here. Accordingly I won't be doing a image review or source review at this stage either.

Preliminary checks

• The sourcing of the more recent history is a bit heavy on maps. I'm not necessarily opposed to this, but I assume you've checked the archives.
• No other issues.

Lead

• Its general routing took it - a bit repetitive

RD

• there-unnumbered - then-unnumbered?
• Last paragraph - two consecutive sentences starting with "North of"

History

• principle -> principal
• although all sections of it are still state highways - needs a cite to a recent map

Otherwise it seemed pretty straightforward. --Rschen7754 22:12, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

@Rschen7754: all done, if you'd like to take a look. I have checked the various news archives, and I will do so again right before any FAC nomination just to make sure that we've exhausted the options to replace citations. Imzadi 1979 → 07:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

• Support issues resolved. --Rschen7754 18:34, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Review by Dough4872

Comments by Dough4872:

1. "At the crossing of the Huron River, US 24/US 25 crossed into Flat Rock and Wayne County." you use the verb cross twice.
2. I noticed US 25 is overused a little bit in the route description, might want to change some instances.
3. When US 25 was created in 1926, what route was the northern terminus at in Port Huron? This should be clarified in the history.
4. "The first, in Port Huron provides access to the Blue Water Bridge from the mainline of the highway in 1940.", this should be in past tense.
5. Do you have the AASHTO minutes for the date they approved the decommissioning of US 25 in Michigan? That would be worth mentioning in the history.
6. In the related trunklines section, you should clarify where the termini were for both the US 25As along with Bus. US 25. Also you may want to consider giving each one a mini-infobox and a subsection as I assume they are not covered anywhere else.
7. If possible, I would suggest getting more pictures for the article, even historical map scans that are appropriately licensed would work. Dough4872 02:01, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

   @Dough4872: all done except the photos/maps. I'll work on that a bit later today. Imzadi 1979 → 11:25, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

• Support - The article should be good for FAC. Dough4872 15:45, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Image check

I'll go ahead and claim this one. Shouldn't take too long. SounderBruce 20:57, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Comments:

1. File:US 25 Michigan 1948.svg – PD-self (based on image licensed as PD-MUTCD)
2. File:US 25 MI map.svg – CC-BY-SA 3.0 / GFDL
3. File:Intersection of M-125 & US 24.JPG – CC-BY 3.0
4. File:Interstate 94 MI at Exit 271.jpg – CC-BY-SA 2.0 (Flickr transfer OK'd by bot)
5. File:M-25-MI-s01.jpg – CC-BY-SA 3.0 / GFDL
6. File:US 25 Gratiot Ave 1941.jpg – PD-US-1978-89 (quick records search brought up no renewal, so it's PD for the U.S. at least)
7. Captions: I don't think including the months on modern images is all that necessary, but it isn't something that warrants a no vote.

Support. Images are in order and do as good a job of illustrating a former highway as one can today. SounderBruce 21:10, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

• Source review - I had already checked source reliability when I did the first review, but looked again and found no issues. I looked at the formatting and couldn't find anything to note either. --Rschen7754 21:54, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

---

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ontario Highway 420

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

• Featured article candidates/Ontario Highway 420/archive1

Ontario Highway 420 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) review

Suggestion: Promote to A-Class

Nominator's comments: I'm bringing this here because I'm somewhat sketchy of its comprehensiveness and flow, and I figure it could use a good polish before any future FAC.

Nominated by: Floydian ^τ _¢ 00:39, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

First comment occurred: 02:15, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Review by Dough4872

Review by Dough4872

I will review this article. Dough4872 02:15, 22 June 2015 (UTC) Comments:

1. In the infobox, you should add the locations of where the junctions are.

   They're all in Niagara Falls - Floydian ^τ _¢

   I would either add a redundant mention of "in Niagara Falls" after each junction or a location parameter to the infobox to indicate the route is in Niagara Falls. Dough4872 06:31, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

   Went with the latter - Floydian ^τ _¢ 00:28, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

2. "The highway has a speed limit of 80 km/h, making it the only 400-series highway to have a speed limit less than 100 km/h for its entirety.", should add conversions to mph to help us Americans.

   Done - Floydian ^τ _¢

3. "However, as of 2014, there are no firm proposals in place.", any updates on this?

   See below regarding the western extension. - Floydian ^τ _¢

4. I don't think the historical information about the Dorchester Road interchange in the route description can be sourced to Google Maps.

   I've got a hidden note that mentions that info being confirmed by the Region of Niagara (I have the email still), but I'm not sure how to source this as this fact is overlooked by all sources. Any thoughts? - Floydian ^τ _¢

   Either try to find reliable sources to back the statements or otherwise remove it. Dough4872 06:31, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

   Fixed. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 00:28, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

5. "The route passes through a concrete trench and abruptly curves to the southeast as it passes beneath Victoria Avenue, with which there is a simple interchange", you use the verb "passes" twice in this sentence.

   Fixed - Floydian ^τ _¢

6. "East of this point, the road was named Newman Hill until March 2012.", what is it named now?

   The previous paragraph mentions this. - Floydian ^τ _¢

7. Curious question, has there ever been sign theft due to the highway being numbered 420?

   Certainly not by me................. But nothing in the news regarding that. - Floydian ^τ _¢

8. The sentence "The new link featured a traffic circle at Dorchester Road as well as at the QEW. Four gravel lanes opened between Niagara Falls and Fort Erie during the summer of 1941, becoming the main route of the QEW;[18] as a result, what would become Highway 420 was referred to by several names, including the Queen Elizabeth Way Extension (and known by locals for decades as the "Queen E Extension")[19] and the Rainbow Bridge Approach." should be split. Also, a citation is needed for the Rainbow Bridge Approach name.

   Done - Floydian ^τ _¢

9. "In 1966, they began to purchase properties lining Roberts Street.[20] In 1971, construction began on a three-level stack interchange between the QEW and the Rainbow Bridge Approach" you begin two consecutive sentences with "In 19xx".

   Fixed - Floydian ^τ _¢

10. Citation needed for "While the section near the QEW junction has high-mast lighting, like other provincial freeways, the rest of the route (including Regional Road 420) had the "ER" lightposts to commemorate the route's historical status as the original routing of the QEW."

    Added - Floydian ^τ _¢

11. In the lead, you mention plans for a proposed extension westward but there is no mention of it in a Future section or as part of the History in the prose. Is it possible for information about this planned extension to be added to the prose? Dough4872 02:34, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

    Since I can't find anything regarding this, I'm simply removing it. The Mid-Pen Highway has been through enough iterations to make each a mere line on a map and nothing more. - Floydian ^τ _¢

Pinging @Floydian: - Evad37 [talk] 07:47, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Note: I've suspended this nomination since there have not been any edits to this review in 30 days - Evad37 [talk] 03:48, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

@Floydian: Do you intend to resume this nomination soon? If not, it will be closed. --Rschen7754 18:59, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Forgot about this. I'm ready to resume work on this. Responses have been made to Dough's notes above at this point. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 06:23, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

More fixes made - Floydian ^τ _¢ 00:28, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

• Support - It's been a long time coming, but I will now support this as my issues have been addressed. Dough4872 00:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Source review by happy5214

This will be my first source review, so bear with me.

Individual footnotes

• FN 1: The linked page states the data are from 2010.
• FN 6/7: Google is overlinked.
• FN 8/19/21/26: Stamp 1987 doesn't refer to anything in the bibliography. Possible earlier edition of Stamp 1992?
• FN 10: No by-line in linked article, so I couldn't confirm the author.
• FN 11: Link appears dead.
• FN 14: What makes this a reliable source?

  Read the associated HTML comment. I'll pass the buck along to either Imzadi or FAC.

• FN 22: Last, First format needed for consistency. I couldn't access the link when I checked.
• FN 27: Link not required, but is there one to add?

General

• Dates look fine to me.
• Publication cities: There are several publications with "Niagara" in their names that I assume were published in Niagara Falls. I don't see "Falls" in many of them.
• Maps could use scales.

I'll let @Imzadi1979: look over this review and some of the finer points and others I probably have missed. -happy5214 21:22, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

• Most fixed, with the exception of 27, as the link that once worked went dead. As for 10, I have access to the actual newspaper article through a database, which lists the author. The link does not, but at least allows readers to view the article. The

Some general additions to what Happy5214 noted above:

• Complete map citations should have scales, or |scale=Scale not given (or even rarely |scale=Not to scale) added unless its to a variable-scale map like Google Maps. For consistency, I've been scales converting to ratios (1 in = 20 mi becomes 1:1,267,200 because 20 miles is 1,267,200 inches, although metric scale ratios are much neater, of course). If the scale is approximate, prefix it with "c.", and if you had to obtain the scale from a library catalog record instead of on the actual map, put it in square brackets.
• Map citations should also have authors (we overhauled {{cite map}} a year ago for this very reason) and only rarely should be using |cartography= anymore. Follow what http://www.worldcat.org/ lists for author information when in doubt. (There's a map of Mackinac Island on the M-185 article drawn by Chris Bessert that does use |cartography= to ensure he's credited while others are indexed as the map's authors, following what the catalogs list.) Publication locations should also be added for paper map citations if they're listed for book citations.
• FN 9 should use |sections= instead of |section= so that you get §§ instead of just §. Just as the abbreviation is doubled from p. to pp. to indicate plural, so it is with § and §§. Ditto |pages= on FN 2.
• {{Google maps}} does have a |date= option for those cases when we're citing Street View to override the automatic access date = publication date behavior when citing dynamically generated maps. Honestly, if it's a SV cite, it probably should be cited with {{cite web}} because you're not actually citing a map, but a photo.
• Whenever possible, try to include an ISBN, ISSN or OCLC number for a source. Based on a presentation at WikiConUSA 2015, it's even a good idea to include an OCLC even if you have an ISBN listed. OCLCs link directly to WorldCat, while ISBNs link to a search page, requiring readers to make a second click to get to library information about the source. Also, several ISBNs can be associated with the same OCLC, because they're essentially all the same source.
• Publishers are not necessary for most newspapers. Volume and issue numbers are superfluous on newspaper citations as they are not routinely archived and indexed by volume, unlike journals. Locations shouldn't really be wikilinked in citations either because it dilutes the value of the links without providing value, unlike links to authors or publishers/newspapers which help readers who want to evaluate the credibility of a source.

  I was going to mention the volume/issue numbers, but I couldn't remember where I had seen that advice. -happy5214 20:46, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

  I'd say that volume and issue numbers are not needed even on "popular" magazines, just academic journals. For instance, Time prints its volume and issue numbers inside each issue in a box with the names of the editorial staff near the table of contents, but they don't print them on the cover. This is similar to many newspapers who also bury it in an interior page. Yes, it's there and could be cited, but it's not really useful.

  Additionally, a recent reviewer thought that I was citing the Wikipedia article on the Michigan Department of Transportation in a footnote because {{cite MDOT map}} linked the name of the cited paper map's publisher in that specific footnote. That's why we need to be judicious in what we link within footnotes to drive our readers to click on the proper link for a source and avoid overlinking just because we can.. Imzadi 1979 → 05:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

• I've found it's nicer to use {{cite book}} for reports and add |type=Report to get the titles in italics. The notion of an unformatted title instead of either quotation marks for a "short-form" work or italics for a "long-form" work is a bit unsettling and seems out of place to me. Judicious use of |chapter= vs. |title= will allow you to choose which way (quotes, italics) to format the title of a report.
• One last suggestion, but there is {{harvp}} or {{sfnp}}, which differ from {{harvnb}} and {{sfn}} by putting their years in parentheses. I find this looks better because it's then more consistent with the rest of the full citations that have dates or years bracketed thusly.

As for FN 14, expect to defend that source at FAC. It may or may not fly there, and if it does, it may only because the reviewers didn't scrutinize it fully. Imzadi 1979 → 06:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

@Floydian: --Rschen7754 02:55, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

• Replied to Happy5214's comments above. I've fixed most of the concerns raised by Imzadi1979, although I have to go dig up the two maps for scales and find the OCLC numbers for the maps and books. Also, most older newspapers (as is the case of this paper from 1940) do show volume and issue right beneath their title on page one and often on the upper margin of each page. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 18:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
  • The New York Times' lists its volume and issue numbers under the masthead, yet we still wouldn't list them for citation purposes. (I don't even think the NYT archives note them in the digital reproductions of articles from past issues, just the page numbers and dates from which those articles came.) For one, libraries catalog them by date, and two, it gets into the realm of pedantry to note why some papers have the numbers defined and others do not while raising concerns about consistency. In short, standard academic citation practice is to only include volume and issue numbers for journals and some magazines and to totally omit them for most other magazines and all newspapers. Imzadi 1979 → 02:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
  • @Floydian: following up with what I said above. Academic journals are traditionally bound into book format at the end of publishing year by libraries. So if a researched needed to consult an article published in volume 42 of the Journal of the American Medical Association, he'd just go to the shelf and pick up a book labeled "volume 42" and the year. Whether or not the issue number needs to be cited relies on if the publisher resets the page numbering between issues or at the end of a volume. As a result, citations for academic journals normally only included the year of publication, the volume and page number, adding the issue number if necessary.

    As for newspapers and "popular magazines", these are traditionally scanned to microfilm and indexed by date. Even modern databases like Newspapers.com or NewspaperArchive.com indexes them just by date and omits the volume and issue numbers, meaning they are superfluous to our needs, which is why they aren't normally included in citations. Imzadi 1979 → 23:03, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

    • Makes sense, I'll stray from it moving forward. Everything should be good on the article now; does it meet your muster? Happy5214, are you........... happy? - Floydian ^τ _¢ 23:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
      • I updated the dates on FN 14, noted the lack of date on FN 11, and added the OCLC numbers on the two books by Stamp. Speaking of the OCLC numbers, I looked for ones for the two maps with ISBN numbers, but I couldn't find acceptable matches. I'd like to follow up on the SV citation, since the "(Map)" in it looks a little weird. I'm also still concerned about the format of the paper map citations, specifically the cartography vs. author issue and the missing scales. I'm fine with the rest, though. @Imzadi1979: anything else? -happy5214 22:44, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
        • @Happy5214: - Reformmated the SV citation as cite web, added the scales, and converted the cartographer to author. I went through about 100 results of each map without an OCLC, and came up short. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 00:51, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
          • A couple of minor tweaks (already made by me) and we're good to go. I'm passing this source review. -happy5214 01:31, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Review by Rschen7754

I will review this article. --Rschen7754 04:44, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Route description

• "Highway 420 is the shortest 400-series highway" - at this point in the RD, I would re-link 400-series highway.
• "is known as Falls Avenue and Newman Hill" it's known as a hill? or the hill was named?
  • The road is called Newman Hill; there is more on this further down the RD. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 17:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
• "west of which it continues" - a bit confusing and repetitive
• "approaches a large interchange" - seems subjective
• parclo is too colloquial, I would spell it out.
• I'm seeing four-level, but four lane. I believe four-lane should be hyphenated throughout.
  • AFAIK, it's only hyphenated when you use it as an adjective: "four-laned". - Floydian ^τ _¢ 17:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
• residential/retail - residential and retail
• The route travels through a concrete trench - could be more specific. Along the bottom of? Cutting right through it?
• I'm pretty sure overpass is not a verb.
• No newspaper articles about the marijuana rallies? --Rschen7754 06:28, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
  • All dealt with, except the four-lane point. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 17:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

History

• King George VI, Queen Elizabeth - wikilink
• German Autobahns - could use a link as well
• whose ambitions?
• summer of 1942 - mid-1942? "Summer" is not the same everywhere.
  • Though I agree enough to make the change, summer is the same throughout Ontario, the location mentioned in the lede sentence. Topics without geographical significance should use neutral language for denoting points in the year, but topics with a set location surely can, no? - Floydian ^τ _¢ 00:35, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
    • It actually is in MOS:SEASONS. --Rschen7754 02:25, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
• While the section near the QEW junction has high-mast lighting, like other provincial freeways, the rest of the route (including Regional Road 420) had the "ER" lightposts to commemorate the route's historical status as the original routing of the QEW - what are "ER" lightposts? It should be more clear without the reader having to go to the other article.

This concludes the review. --Rschen7754 22:35, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

All fixed, but take a look at the last History point, because I'm not sure I worded it very well. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 00:35, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

• Support issues resolved. --Rschen7754 02:30, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Image review by Rschen7754

• Map (CC-BY-SA 3.0) is missing a caption.
• Image captions: if it's a full sentence, it should have a period. If not, it should not.
• File:June 2008 420 ER Lightpost.jpg - CC-BY-SA 3.0/GFDL
• File:420 Expressway.JPG - PD
• File:420 Approaching Rainbow Bridge, 1941.png - PD-Canada
• File:420 Approaching Rainbow Bridge, 1942.jpg - PD-Canada
• File:420 Terminus.JPG - PD
• File:Hwy 420 and Horseshoe Falls.png - CC-BY-SA 3.0, checked Flickr. --Rschen7754 02:55, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

• Fixed the map reference issue, but unsure which images aren't following that protocol? - Floydian ^τ _¢ 03:03, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

• The map still needs a caption in the infobox. Both of the images in the RD need to have the period removed. --Rschen7754 03:23, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

• Done and done :) - Floydian ^τ _¢ 02:37, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

---

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Interstate 675 (Michigan)

The article was promoted. –Fredddie™ 21:10, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

• Featured article candidates/Interstate 675 (Michigan)/archive1

Interstate 675 (Michigan) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) review

Suggestion: Promote to A-Class

Nominator's comments: Since ACR isn't busy, and this is a shorter article, I'll put this up as well. In order to bump the Interstate Highways in Michigan topic from GT to FT, it needs 3 more FAs at the time of this writing. I-275 is at FAC now, and I-94 has been nominated above here at ACR before a future FAC. As to why I chose this one, other than the fact that it's a simple little article, it also falls numerically in the middle of a bunch of Michigan's other FA highways. I-496, Capitol Loop (CL I-496, Connector 496), M-553 and I-696 are all FAs. The writing is straightforward, so this should be easy to review.

Nominated by: Imzadi 1979 → 23:10, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

First comment occurred: 01:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Review by Dough4872

Review by Dough4872

Comments - Here are my concerns that need to be addressed before I can support:

1. "in 2009 through 2011" does not sound right. If it took place between those two years, it should be "from 2009 through 2011".
2. Do you think you can mention how many lanes wide I-675 is in the route description?
3. When you mention I-75 in the route description, you completely ignore the fact that it is concurrent with US 23. You should refer to the road as I-75/US 23.
4. Is there a way an image of the road itself can be added to the article?
5. Are there any more details about the planning and construction of the highway that can be added to the history? The section seems a little short and only mentions the years that construction started and was finished. Dough4872 01:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Replies

1. Changed
2. Added.
3. Added.
4. I will endeavor to get something located before any FAC, but I don't know that I'll be successful before the ACR would close.
5. Sadly, unlike the other 3dIs which have names, this one doesn't, so Barnett didn't cover anything about it in his book on the named highways. I have added some other stuff, expanding on the freeway's role connected to the Zilwaukee Bridge, but that's about all we're going to get at the present time.

@Dough4872: replies made above.

• Support - I will support the article for A-class. Dough4872 15:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Review by Rschen7754

I will review this article. --Rschen7754 02:47, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

• A lot of "crosses" or "crossing" in the first paragraph of the RD.
• to merge back to I-75/US - something missing
• The entire length of the freeway has four lanes (two in each direction) - is it okay to be using Google StreetView (I assume) to source this?
• What was "Initially planned"? The Michigan State Highway Department?
• The I-675 freeway was under construction starting in 1969 - the passive structure is awkward here.
• I-675 was to serve as access to the downtown area... does it today? It seems like a contrast is being set up here that perhaps shouldn't be.
• for upwards of four hours -> for over?
• the state even considered - don't need "even"
• as a mishap during a maintenance project - what sort of mishap?
• Then starting in May 2009 and ending in November 2011, - need a comma after "Then". --Rschen7754 01:09, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Fixes applied for the above, Rschen7754, although there were only three uses of "cross"/"crossing" and only the middle was swapped out for now. Imzadi 1979 → 01:34, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

• Support issues resolved. --Rschen7754 01:57, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Image review by Rschen7754

• I would have to agree with the comments about the image above. I won't hold it up at ACR, but it would affect any support at FAC.
• File:I-675 MI map.svg - GFDL 1.2/CC-BY-SA 3.0, sources noted
• File:Saginaw, Michigan 1955 Yellow Book.jpg - PD-US-Gov (dept of commerce)

 Done --Rschen7754 16:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

• Note: The review has been suspended for being inactive for 30 days and having outstanding comments. It may be reactivated at any time in the next 6 months. --Rschen7754 07:16, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • All replies made, reactivating. Imzadi 1979 → 09:05, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Source review and spotcheck by Rschen7754

• All Saginaw News links need to be switched to the archive.
• 18 - good on CP and V.
• 17 - not supported by source.
• 15 - good on CP and V. --Rschen7754 06:47, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

@Rschen7754: All of the Saginaw News links were flipped around, and the sentence was tweaked for n17 to track the source a little closer. Imzadi 1979 → 01:42, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

 Done and ready to close. --Rschen7754 03:50, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

---

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Interstate 94 in Michigan

This uninvolved editor deems the conditions for promotion as met, and hereby promotes this article to A-Class. -happy5214 02:05, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

• Featured article candidates/Interstate 94 in Michigan/archive1

Interstate 94 in Michigan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) review

Suggestion: Promote to A-Class

Nominator's comments: This is the last of Michigan's primary Interstates to be promoted up from GA and part of a drive to promote the Interstate Highways in Michigan topic from GT to FT status.

Nominated by: Imzadi 1979 → 20:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

First comment occurred: 22:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Review by Fredddie

Comments by Fredddie

It's been a while since I've reviewed something so here goes. –Fredddie™ 22:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC) Infobox and lead That's a very nice map. Ref 1 does not directly support the claim that I-94 was designated in 1959. It talks about the system needing approval from the feds, but it doesn't say it actually was approved. The two sentences in the first lead paragraph talking about the path through Michigan don't really flow. You seem to go across the state, but then you come back to the west. Separately, the highway doesn't terminate on the bridge to Canada, the I-94 designation does. Route description I don't like the NHS sentence because I don't think it adds anything to an article, but I'm not going to fight it. Some flow issues in the AADT sentence. I don't really like how the semicoloned part reads with the whole. Immediately east of the Blue Water Bridge in Port Huron? Isn't that Canada? I think "...and parallels the Lake Michigan shoreline about three miles (4.8 km) inland." fits better in the next sentence What is the Red Arrow Highway? Just an access road to Red Arrow? It sounds more important than it probably is. I-94/US 31, is that singular or plural? I always treat overlaps as a plural. Are the charter townships worth mentioning? For someone not familiar with Michigan, it's hard enough to find the cities let alone townships. Check how many times you use the word cross. There are a few too close together. Likewise, I know Jackson is in Jackson County, but some of it can be reworded. "South of Willow Run, I-94 parallels Belleville Lake. East of the lake, it intersects I-275..." more repetition Bridges inspired by Super Bowl XL? That link is dead so I can't read about that. The paragraph about Detroit proper seems...abrupt. I'll defer to another reviewer to see if this is really an issue. It took me a bit to see it. The I-69 junction really doesn't pop out to the reader. History I'm a big proponent of section mini-leads. The first section kind of serves that purpose, so I don't know if the header is necessary. In the Since completion section, "A decade later, ..." makes it sound like the two sentences are related. The rest of the sections look fine to me. –Fredddie™ 01:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC) @Imzadi1979: --Rschen7754 19:08, 14 August 2016 (UTC) Replies: Infobox and lead Well, that's a compliment to the cartographer I'll have to pass along. ;-) Swapped it out. Fixed, I think. Fixed. More to come... Imzadi 1979 → 02:20, 15 August 2016 (UTC) Route description Let's see what others say, and go from there. Revised. Fixed. Flipped. Added an aside for the origins of the name I always try to treat them as singular since it's one highway in that location with two names, like a person with a double-barrelled name, not two separate roadways. They tend to have their own identities in urbanized areas and less so in rural ones, so in this case I think the few bear mention. Pared down. And also pared down. Tweaked. Link resurrected. I'm open to suggestions on what we could add there I"m not sure what to add here for that "pop". @Fredddie: that should be the first pass on all of your comments. Imzadi 1979 → 07:53, 18 September 2016 (UTC) History I'm mixed on that. Shall we pass this along to others to weigh in for now? Already fixed earlier. Imzadi 1979 → 07:53, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

• Support. Nothing that we may have disagreed upon is enough to hold up this review. I will note for posterity, though, that for concurrencies, I always say "the two highways go..." or "US X and US Y pass through...". Thus it's appropriate then to consider them a plural. –Fredddie™ 17:18, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Review by Dough4872

Review by Dough4872

I will review this article. Dough4872 01:42, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

@Dough4872: ping. –Fredddie™ 01:59, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Here is my review:

1. I count 11 junctions in the infobox, whatever is the least important junction of those should be removed.
2. In the sentence "I-94 enters Michigan south of New Buffalo", you should indicate that the road enters the state from Indiana.
3. In the route description, you should mention how many lanes wide the sections of I-94 are and where it widens or narrows. I notice you give an overview of lane counts in the mini-lead but it would help to provide more details in the main prose of the route description.
4. I notice you overuse "I-94" a lot in the route description. You might want to vary the wording a bit.
5. The sentences "I-94 continues eastward out of the eastern Kalamazoo suburbs. It parallels the Kalamazoo River through the Galesburg area" should be combined.
6. "Before crossing into Calhoun County on the east side of Battle Creek", wouldn't this be the west side?
7. The sentence "Next to the Lakeview Square Mall, I-94 meets its own auxiliary Interstate in Michigan: I-194." sounds weird. Did you mean only instead of own?
8. "The freeway runs north of a racetrack complex in Chelsea next to the M-52 interchange.", what is the name of the racetrack complex?
9. "South of that city, the freeway also carries US 12 and crosses the Huron River north of its entry into Ford Lake.", is Ford Lake a town or a lake? Just wondering because it would be weird for a highway to "enter" a lake.
10. "I-94 used the Gateway Bridge over the single-point interchange at US 24 (Telegraph Road) in Taylor;", does it still use this bridge? If so that should be in present tense.
11. " From there, it runs roughly parallel to the St. Clair River. I-94 runs along the western edge of residential areas for Marysville and Port Huron as it continues northward.", you use the verb "runs" in two consecutive sentences.
12. In the sentence "At the international boundary at the center of the river, the I-94 designation jointly terminates with I-69.", you should mention what the road becomes in Canada.
13. "One of these, the St. Joseph Trail, followed the path of the modern I-94.", how much of present-day I-94's path did it follow?
14. "and the former routing through downtown on Michigan Avenue became a Business US 12 (Bus. US 12)", I don't see the "a" before Business US 12 as really necessary.
15. "On August 16, 1987, Northwest Airlines Flight 255 crashed after attempting to take off from Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport, killing all but one passenger, Cecilia Cichan, upon exploding at an overpass at Middlebelt Road", is it really necessary to mention the name of the sole survivor of the crash?
16. "The project was slated to be completed in 2015.", do we know if the project was completed in 2015?
17. Should we be using the closed color for an intersection designated to serve military vehicles only? Dough4872 03:45, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

All of the above have had edits applied except two. I don't think we need to specify exact places where the lane counts change when the general gist of how wide is already in the mini lead. The driveway there is closed to regular traffic, but it could be the incomplete light red color. Imzadi 1979 → 03:01, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

@Dough4872: I'm not adding the lane count changes. Interstate 75 in Michigan does the same as this article, noting the basics in its RD mini-lead, and that should be sufficient for this article too. Imzadi 1979 → 06:19, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

• Support - I will support the article for A-class. I still would prefer for the lane count changes to be added in the route description, though I will let it slide with the summary mention in the mini-lead. Dough4872 00:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Inactivity

• Note: The review has been suspended for being inactive for 30 days and having outstanding comments. It may be reactivated at any time in the next 6 months. --Rschen7754 07:16, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
• Reply—and I'm reactivating it now. Imzadi 1979 → 07:53, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
• @Fredddie, Dough4872, and Rschen7754: since this isn't garnering a lot of attention, any thoughts on whether or not this review can be closed and jump right to FAC? Maybe someone can at least do an image review and quick source review to have that done before FAC? Imzadi 1979 → 13:46, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
  • I believe that a spotcheck is technically required as well - it is required once a year for every editor, and it has been a year since we have done one (for any editor) at ACR. Note that it could be done for I-675 first, it doesn't have to be for this particular ACR. Or, we could drop the requirement altogether. --Rschen7754 03:28, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Image review by Dough4872

1. File:I-94.svg - PD-MUTCD
2. File:I-94 MI map.svg - CC-BY-3.0, GFDL, has GIS data
3. File:Non Interchange Signage with Mileage Signage.jpg - PD-self
4. File:Interstate 94 & U.S. 23 interchange.JPG - CC-BY-3.0
5. File:Interstate 94 Landing at Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County International Airport, Romulus, Michigan (14017169320).jpg - CC-BY-SA-2.0
6. File:Interstate 94 MI at Exit 271.jpg - CC-BY-SA-2.0
7. File:Michigan's Indian trails.png - PD US not renewed, image from 1959
8. File:Interstate Highway plan June 27, 1958 (MI).jpg - PD US no notice, image from 1958
9. File:Uniroyal tire1.jpg - CC-BY-SA-3.0-migrated, GFDL
10. File:NW255 crashsite.jpg - PD-US-NTSB
11. File:Edsel Bryant Ford.jpg - PD-US-1923, image from 1921
12. File:James G. O'Hara.jpg - PD-USGov-Congress
13. File:Interstate 194 Michigan.jpg - CC-BY-SA-2.0
14. Captions look fine. Dough4872 01:22, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Source review by Rschen7754

• Refs 52, 89, 73, 75 are dead.
• 86 - perhaps the location should be added?
• Also, for the map scales, sometimes you surround it in brackets, sometimes you don't.
• Michigan Department of State Highways linked twice. --Rschen7754 18:55, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Map scales are bracketed if they were obtained from library catalog records and not from the cited maps themselves, in keeping with standard citation practices. n 86 doesn't need the location as it's contained in the title of the cited newspaper.

As for the supposedly dead links, n52 links to a clipping, n73 still links to the target, although I just pre-emptively archived it, and n75 was flipped to its archive. I'll do some more pre-emptive archiving today. Imzadi 1979 → 19:20, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

 Done and ready to close. --Rschen7754 19:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

---

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.