Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Maps task force/Requests
Appearance
(Redirected from Wikipedia:USRD/MTFR)
| A subpage for a department of the U.S. Roads WikiProject | ||
You can request maps on this page. Your request will then be handled by a participant of the maps department. Instructions and guidelines are provided below. Requests will typically be handled by a member of the maps department; however, they can be completed by anyone willing to take on the request.
Guidelines
|
Requesting a new map
|
Requesting a corrected map
|
Completing a request
|
- Class:
C-Class article - Action required: Correction to existing map
- Status: New request
- KML: Yes
- Comments: The map shows that the SR 223 ends at intersection of SR 80 (Washington Highway) and Cedar Rock Road in Cedar Rock but it actually ends at the corner of SR 17 and White Oak Street in Thomson. 2600:1700:6180:6290:A044:C48B:628:21FD (talk) 21:01, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- Class:
Start-Class article - Action required: Correction to existing map
- Status: New request
- KML: Yes
- Comments: The current map is missing three segments: (1) I-76 between Denver and Brush, CO; (2) Nebraska State Highway 71 between Scottsbluff, NE and the Colorado State Line; and (3) Colorado State Highway 71 between the Nebraska State Line and Limon, CO. These segments are mentioned as part of the expressway in the article. BrianHagan (talk) 02:18, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
- Class:
Start-Class article - Action required: New KML map
- Status: New request
- KML: No
- Comments: I am not requesting an interactive map, but I am requesting a KML map for the Monticello Crossroads Scenic Byway. Unlike other highways in the state of Georgia, this scenic byway does not a KML file. The roundabout might look like the US 25 split ass seen here. --2600:1700:6180:6290:94BF:42AB:5F9D:CD7F (talk) 21:04, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Class:
C-Class article - Action required: Correction to existing map
- Status: New request
- KML: Yes
- Comments: The current map is from roughly 2023 or 2024, and is missing the recent extensions, primarily in Indianapolis and Southern Kentucky. GenericCacti (talk) 01:24, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- Class:
C-Class article - Action required: New map
- Status: New request
- KML: No
- Comments: U.S. Route 66 in Texas is in a desperate need of a new interactive map and a new KML file. I've also removed the Google Maps reference; please see this comment on why I've decided to do so. 2600:1700:6180:6290:812C:1BB6:6164:B919 (talk) 02:29, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Class:
Start-Class article - Action required: New map
- Status: New request
- KML: No
- Comments: Wikidata map(?) currently in infobox is in the middle of an ocean for some reason. The Bushranger One ping only 01:38, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Class:
Good article - Action required: Correction to existing map
- Status: New request
- KML: No
- Comments: Map is unclear, with borders and interstates being the same color, as well as colors not matching those in descriptions Indium13 (talk) 02:32, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Tennessee State Route 155 map change
[edit]- Class:
C-Class article - Action required: Correction to existing map
- Status: New request
- KML:
- Comments: I can't find the exact file. I am requesting that the Woodmont Boulevard section the map file for Tennessee State Route 155 (between US 70S and US 31) be changed to a different color, preferably blue. This is because Woodmont Boulevard technically isn't part of SR 155, but is often mistaken as part of that route, forming a complete ring road with it. As such, mention of Woodmont Boulevard when referring to the entirely of SR 155 is pretty much guaranteed. Bneu2013 (talk) 04:57, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Cross County Parkway
[edit]- Class:
C-Class article - Action required: Additional map of proposed extension of the Cross County Parkway from Hutchinson River Parkway to the New England Thruway in the vicinity of the Rye Playland Parkway
- Status: New request
- KML: Not between the Cross County and Playland Parkways
- Comments: The current map shows the existing route of the Cross County Parkway and is acceptable in its own right, thought it does not contain the link to southbound Hutchinson River Parkway and from northbound Hutchinson River Parkway. A map of the extension will give readers a clearer idea of the location of the formerly proposed extension. -----User:DanTD (talk) 02:30, 6 March 2026 (UTC)