Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Language/2012 January 31

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Language desk
< January 30 << Dec | January | Feb >> February 1 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Language Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


January 31

[edit]

"Of course"

[edit]

The "f" in "of" is normally pronounced like "v." However, it seems to me that in the United States, people say "f" when saying "of course". Listen to this person. Is this an exception?--72.152.244.173 (talk) 09:04, 31 January 2012 (UTC)reply

Did you extrapolate your opinion about "people" in the United States from that single example; or do you have other evidence? -- Jack of Oz [your turn] 09:51, 31 January 2012 (UTC)reply
This is my opinion based on what I hear. I could be mishearing; however, I've tried my hardest. I keep hearing "f" instead "v" in "of course." --72.152.244.173 (talk) 10:01, 31 January 2012 (UTC)reply
My other evidence.--72.152.244.173 (talk) 10:04, 31 January 2012 (UTC)reply
It's probably just voicing assimilation in rapid speech. I'm sure if you asked people to speak slowly and put a pause in between the two words, the /v/ sound in "of" would come back. It's not the same as used in "I used to like it", where the devoicing is completely lexicalized. No matter how slowly people articulate it or how much pause they put in between the words, used in that meaning is [ju:st] ("yoost", to rhyme with "roost"). Angr (talk) 10:09, 31 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Even when I try to say "of course," the "f" of "of" starts to sound like "f" instead of "v." However, I take it that you tell the sound of "of" in "of course" is "v."--72.152.244.173 (talk) 10:30, 31 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Depends on what you mean by "is". I'd say the "f" of "of course" is phonemically /v/ but phonetically ranges from [v] to [f] depending on speaker, rate of speech, and other factors. Angr (talk) 11:22, 31 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Hereon out, I will produce /v/ when I say "of course."--72.152.244.173 (talk) 12:25, 31 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Why? Pronounce it however it feels most natural to you. Angr (talk) 13:44, 31 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Merriam-Webster says you don't have to pronounce either [f] or [v] before a consonant. Just grunting out a schwa is sufficient. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:37, 31 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Interesting way to maybe sneak in a plug for that guy. :) In any case, the way he says it sounds normal to this American. If you were to say it with an "f" instead of a "v" it would sound like "off course", which of course has a very different meaning. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots14:52, 31 January 2012 (UTC)reply
I listened to the animation maybe 10 times, and it's a "v" sound. Maybe not a real hard "v", but harder than a normal "f". ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots14:54, 31 January 2012 (UTC)reply
For me, an American, both the "v" and the "f" seem natural. I think I normally use the "v" though, but it depends on where I put the emphasis. If I put a lot of emphasis on "course", I don't voice the "f" to make a "v" sound. Huh, never thought about it before. Falconusp t c 00:24, 1 February 2012 (UTC)reply
I've heard Americans and Canadians devoice the 'of' in 'of course' from time to time, and I think we Brits sometimes do it (when we actually pronounce the full word 'of' in "'course"). KägeTorä - (影虎) (TALK) 01:08, 1 February 2012 (UTC)reply
I don't think that the pronounciation of a single letter can characterize a society. Word pronounciation and sentence structure are much more relevant and easier to use as a source of national identification. Regards.--MarshalN20 | Talk 17:20, 1 February 2012 (UTC)reply
See Shibboleth.—Wavelength (talk) 17:37, 1 February 2012 (UTC)reply

Hebrew

[edit]