Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2020 October 16

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Computing desk
< October 15 << Sep | October | Nov >> October 17 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Computing Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


October 16

[edit]

How do I access and download the this image at full resolution?

[edit]

I recently found an image through the Google Image search and the result page indicates that the image is 7913×6456 pixels. However, when I opened the image in new tab, the result is quite small at only 249×203 pixels as could be seen in the following link:

According to Google, the image in question was from this page. Was the aforementioned original resolution given by Google Image accurate? If so, how do I access and download it at that maximum resolution? StellarHalo (talk) 01:56, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply

StellarHalo, clicking through and zooming in, I obtained this URL which should be your full-resolution image. Sotheby's did a number of tricks to prevent that until I zoomed in fully. Google Images is a rather poor tool for obtaining full-resolution images if the target pages do not cooperate. Elizium23 (talk) 02:03, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The one you found is actually a different version from the one I was referring to and trying to find at full resolution. On the Sotheby's page I linked to, the image that initially appears on there has different lighting than the one that shows up in the slideshow. In any case, the one I want should look like this image but larger at 7913×6456 pixels instead. StellarHalo (talk) 02:22, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
I used TinEye on that Wikimedia file -- actually I saved a local copy because TinEye didn't like the URL, and used it on the local copy -- and it led me here. Is that what you want?  Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.89.48.182 (talk) 09:10, 16 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Yes. Thank you ver much. I really appreciate your assistance. I totally forgot about TinEye's existence and it seems that it really is superior in its reverse image search capability compared to Google Image. StellarHalo (talk) 11:28, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply