Wikipedia:Peer review/Java (programming language)/archive1
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for June 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
Once featured, now only B-class. No review since open sourcing of Java (2007). General review needed.
Thanks, Kozuch (talk) 21:48, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: I agree this is not FA or even GA in its current state. It is an interesting article and while it is clear that a lot of work has been put into it, much more is needed to improve it further. Here are some suggestions for improvement:
- I would look at the FAR closely and make sure all of the points raised there are addressed.
- Article lead needs to be expanded per WP:LEAD. The lead should be an accessible and inviting overview of the whole article. My rule of thumb is to include every header in the lead in some way - for example Applet, Servlet and Criticisms do not seem to be in the lead.
- Biggest problem I see with the article is that it has very few references, especially for its length. For example the last three paragraphs of Criticism have no (ZERO) refs. See WP:CITE and WP:V
- My rule of thumb is that every quote, every statistic, every extraordinary claim and every paragraph needs a ref.
- Refs that are there often are inomplete and need more information. Internet refs need URL, title, author if known, publisher and date accessed. {{cite web}} and other cite templates may be helpful.
- Article is very list-y, this should be converted to prose where possible. Some lists, like the five goals, are OK, but this is too many
- Article seems to have too many See also links and the External links section does look like a link farm.
- The programs (code) do not seem to have any refs - how is that not original research?
- While I think a few examples of code are useful, the article seems to be more like a programming manual (how to). See WP:NOT
- A model article is often useful for ideas - there are several possible FA models at Wikipedia:Featured_articles#Computing
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)