Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:PLM Chapel
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Salvio 08:28, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Pure promotion, G11 declined. Also not notable. JavaHurricane 05:45, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - does not read as pure promotion. -- Whpq (talk) 13:52, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep and also would recommend a slightly less WP:BITEy AFC rejection here. "Contrary to the five pillars" is way overdramatic, Wikipedia absolutely has articles on tons of churches. This article just needs some reliable, secondary sources to show notability, as it's largely primary sourced at the moment. But a chapel directly in the downtown of Manila seems highly likely to actually be notable - compare with something like Trinitatis Church. Give this one time. SnowFire (talk) 00:05, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. I don't see how this is unacceptably promotional. "a spiritual home for the catholic population of the University" is a bit unencyclopedic, as are the honorifics in front of everyone's names, but that's just amateurish writing, not blatant spam. I don't think this should have been rejected - even if it doesn't turn out to be independently notable it could probably be mentioned at University of the City of Manila and redirected there. Spicy (talk) 03:30, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Strong keep and revert rejection. This isn't ready for approval, but seems likely to be a notable topic, and is not sufficiently promotional as to warrens deletion. Also revert the rejection, which is not in my view warranted. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 23:59, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep; Merge and Redirect to Intramuros#Churches, adding it as a chapel in addition to the eight churches. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:27, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Discuss at Talk:Intramuros#PLM_Chapel. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Even if it needed rejecting, do not see why it then needs deletion. And we are not discussing the merits of the rejection. Robert McClenon (talk) 11:29, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep if it is not notable it will not make it to the encyclopedia. Wm335td (talk) 15:05, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Not anywhere near G11-levels of promotion. Like the others have said, the only issues here are amateurish writing and a lack of sources. It's certainly a lot higher quality than most of the drafts I tag for G11. Nathan2055talk - contribs 01:26, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.