Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Object Overload
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Salvio giuliano 21:55, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable web series. See also WP:BFDI. TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 18:08, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Question - User:TrademarkedTWOrantula - Please explain why you were reviewing drafts for notability. I would like to know why editors nominate drafts for deletion for notability, so that we can determine whether clearer instructions are needed to avoid these well-intentioned but misguided nominations. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:41, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - Vandalism reverted. Original draft text restored. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:41, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - See draft notability guideline, which is that drafts are not deleted for notability. Drafts are declined for lack of notability, but this draft was not submitted. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:41, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Would this be treated as an expired draft? It would have been WP:G13'd a few months ago if not for a vandalism edit. Curbon7 (talk) 00:19, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, I guess. Drafts aren't supposed to be deleted for notability. I doubt another IP will come back and edit it, but there's no harm in letting it delete itself. C F A 💬 01:56, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.