Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Requests
Requests for assessment
[edit]Editors can self-assess articles against the five B-class criteria(FAQ) up to and including C-Class. If you have made significant improvements to an article against one or more of B-class criteria and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below, specifying which criteria you have worked on. If you feel unable to assess against one or more of the B-class criteria, please say so when posting. Requests for formal A-Class review should be made at the review department. Please consider entering articles you have improved in the military history article writing contest.
Experienced assessors are encouraged to take a look at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators#AutoCheck report for September and check a few of ≈ B-Class assessments. Feel free to downgrade them if you consider they don't meet one or more the criteria. Please also delete any that you have checked. See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Spaceflight/Assessment, whose articles often overlap with military history topics.
ADD NEW REQUESTS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS SECTION AND BEFORE THE LINE FOR THE BACKLOG CHECK REQUEST
Please remember to sign your requests.
- Portuguese conquest of Hormuz Expanded by me. Wareno (talk) 00:55, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- The article looks good for B Class except that the lead (introduction) is too short for B-class, and especially for such a detailed article. Please expand the lead. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Academy/Writing an effective article introduction and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section for more information. Please post a reply here when this is done so the assessment can be finished at B class. Then I think a good article review would be appropriate. But note that the requests for good article assessments are quite backed up. See Wikipedia:Good article nominations if you have not submitted one before and are interested in pursuing a review at that level. Thanks Donner60 (talk) 07:32, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- I have made the changes you @Donner60 and @Hawkeye7 have requested and hoping the article is now fit for B Class. Wareno (talk) 19:01, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- James-Baillie Fraser (1825) generates a warning that the book is too old for an ISBN. Consider using the form <surname, given names> for the References and moving all the book references into that section. Also: Who is Fraser (fn 2)? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:47, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Wareno: Is Fraser 1828 (fn 2) or 1825? What is Brás 1875 (fn 22)? Is it Earle & Villers 1990 or Earle & Villiers 1990 (fn 32)? Also: there are now ISBN incompatbility warnings for Boxer, Fraser and Wilson. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:40, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Hawkeye7 How does it look like now? Thanks. Wareno (talk) 17:01, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
- Still needs a few references. Second paragraph of Background. Fourth paragraph of Battle. Fourth paragraph of The Portuguese fortress. Third and fifth paragraphs of Portuguese administration. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:04, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Hawkeye7 How does it look like now? Thanks. Wareno (talk) 17:01, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Wareno: Is Fraser 1828 (fn 2) or 1825? What is Brás 1875 (fn 22)? Is it Earle & Villers 1990 or Earle & Villiers 1990 (fn 32)? Also: there are now ISBN incompatbility warnings for Boxer, Fraser and Wilson. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:40, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- The article looks good for B Class except that the lead (introduction) is too short for B-class, and especially for such a detailed article. Please expand the lead. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Academy/Writing an effective article introduction and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section for more information. Please post a reply here when this is done so the assessment can be finished at B class. Then I think a good article review would be appropriate. But note that the requests for good article assessments are quite backed up. See Wikipedia:Good article nominations if you have not submitted one before and are interested in pursuing a review at that level. Thanks Donner60 (talk) 07:32, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
393rd Bomb SquadronHawkeye7 suggested I take a look at this, which Hawkeye described as "a mess." Now, please review for B Class. Thanks. Lineagegeek (talk) 22:55, 23 September 2026 (UTC)- Can we have citations for the explanatory notes? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 13:13, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
- Done. Sources for explanatory notes concerning emblems are in immediately following notes. Lineagegeek (talk) 15:27, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
- B class. Great work!! Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:00, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
- Done. Sources for explanatory notes concerning emblems are in immediately following notes. Lineagegeek (talk) 15:27, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
- Can we have citations for the explanatory notes? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 13:13, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
Battle of Thannurisfor B-class. Thank you. A.Cython(talk) 04:58, 26 September 2026 (UTC)- Assessed B-class. Donner60 (talk) 08:14, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
James Harry Lacey: expanded/improved article for a British flying ace, please update assessment. Thanks, Zawed (talk) 11:37, 26 September 2026 (UTC)- B-class (I made some minor c/e, double check) A.Cython(talk) 15:26, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
Orion-class ship of the linefor B class--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:46, 30 September 2026 (UTC)- Assessed B-class. Donner60 (talk) 03:11, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
Hans Döbrich— a Luftwaffe pilot, I expanded and cited the article. Please review MisterBee1966 (talk) 14:47, 2 October 2026 (UTC)- Assessed B-class. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:34, 3 October 2026 (UTC)
- The date of death differs multiple times in and between the lede, infobox, and main text. Otherwise should be B class. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:06, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks, fixed MisterBee1966 (talk) 16:14, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
Please also check the military history assessment backlog for articles needing assessment.