Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2022 May 8

8 May 2022

• Harold F. Kells (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.gallery.ca/library/ngc023.html. agtx 01:25, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

  Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. MER-C 19:22, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

• Haswell, County Durham. Much of the article added in this 2007 edit, which this edit claims is copyvio of Sunderland Echo story. I can't find the newspaper story online, but the claim seems valid to me. What to do? Revdel back to 2007, or just total rewrite? -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 14:40, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

  Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Finlay McWalter, thanks. I've removed the content, and it should be replaced with new material. Not much left. :/ Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:56, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

• Otto Neitzel This page, badly written as it is, appears to have been copied and pasted from somewhere. Reference numbers appear in the text (but no refs} as would have appeared in an original. Google search reveals the exact text here, but it is not clear if that is the source or if it is, itself, a copy of this Wikipedia article - I suspect the latter. I also wondered if it was a translation form another language Wikipedia but this does not appear to be the case, so I am left with the view that this is a copyvio from somewhere. Emeraude (talk) 21:36, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

  This is, in part, an unattributed translation from the German Wikipedia. But that explains only part of the text. MER-C 18:50, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

• Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Reverted the whole mess again. I didn't rev-delete, though. I'm a bit out of practice. :) If rev deletion seems advisable, please feel free! Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:11, 28 May 2022 (UTC)