Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survivor registry (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR applies. plicit 04:09, 3 October 2022 (UTC)reply

Survivor registry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Struggling to find sources that discuss the concept of survivor registries as a group, which would indicate notability of the broader category. Eddie891 Talk Work 02:38, 12 September 2022 (UTC)reply

  • Keep. Appears to now be a concept used for disaster preparedness among first responders and in measures adopted by governments for disaster response. Its also used in medical research for following up on patients who survive illnesses (such as a "cancer survivor registry"); or even studying disaster survivors such as those from the Oklahoma City Bombing and the Chernobyl disaster. Some coverage of the concept can be found in the sources below.4meter4 (talk) 02:19, 19 September 2022 (UTC)reply
  • Hiroyuki Miyazaki, Sakiko Kanbara, Shoko Miyagawa (ed.). "24.4.3.3 Construction of a Disaster Survivor Registry and Preparing For The Next Disaster". Disaster Nursing, Primary Health Care and Communication in Uncertainty. Springer International Publishing. p. 281. ISBN 9783030982973.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)
  • Barbie Zelizer, Stuart Allan, Victor Navasky (ed.). Journalism After September 11. Routledge. p. 122-124. ISBN 9780415288002.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)
  • Geller, Berta M. ; Mace, John ; Vacek, Pamela ; Johnson, Alison ; Lamer, Camilla ; Cranmer, David (2011). "Are Cancer Survivors Willing to Participate in Research?". Journal of community health. 36 (5): 772-778.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Geller, Berta M ; Vacek, Pamela M ; Flynn, Brian S ; Lord, Kelly ; Cranmer, David (2014). "What are cancer survivors' needs and how well are they being met?". The Journal of family practice. 63 (10): E7-16.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • North, Carol S ; Abbacchi, Anna ; Cloninger, C. Robert (2012). "Personality and posttraumatic stress disorder among directly exposed survivors of the Oklahoma City bombing". Comprehensive psychiatry. 53 (1): 1-8.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • North, Carol S. ; Cloninger, C. Robert ; Kitamura, Toshinori (2012). "Personality and Major Depression among Directly Exposed Survivors of the Oklahoma City Bombing". Depression research and treatment. 2012: 204741-6.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Ivanov, Victor, and Anatoly Tsyb (2006). "RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH EFFECTS 20 YEARS AFTER THE CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT: DATA OF THE NATIONAL RADIATION AND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL REGISTRY". Radiation Risk Estimates in Normal and Emergency Situations: 143-148.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • I mean, yes, it's clear that they exist. Nobody is saying that they aren't used, but even these sources don't really seem to give survivor registries themselves SIGCOV that push them to the level of GNG. I can't access all the journal articles on a quick search and the first article, which seems the most promising only actually says "survivor registries play an important role in improving outcomes and monitoring indicators." Eddie891 Talk Work 02:44, 19 September 2022 (UTC)reply
    And it would seem that all the other sources provided only discuss individual survivor registries, which can certainly be mentioned in other articles. I don't see any other coverage of the broader concept of survivor registries. Eddie891 Talk Work 02:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:40, 19 September 2022 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:20, 26 September 2022 (UTC)reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.