Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Splash Class

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 02:17, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Splash-class cruise ship

Splash-class cruise ship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced and Google did not turn out anything relevant. Also, WP:CRYSTAL as no order has been placed at any shipyard by Carnival Tupsumato (talk) 05:03, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

• Delete as a possible hoax. Nothing on Google turned up any proof of this. Erpert ^{Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it?} 07:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
• Delete. Not a hoax – the new ship is mentioned in the Carnival Cruise Lines article, which cites this source. But there's no mention of it being called "Splash", and neither the unbuilt ship or its class are notable at this point in time. DoctorKubla (talk) 07:17, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

I stand corrected. However, until we get more information about the new ship(s), I don't see the point of having a separate article. It's enough to mention it here. Tupsumato (talk) 08:28, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

• Delete. Per the source above, this ship might exist in the future, but the title, etc., are purely speculative. Fails WP:CRYSTAL and at face value violates WP:V. --Kinu ^t/_c 18:13, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
• Delete for failing WP:V. New ships have been ordered but there are no reliable sources supporting the class name. Speculation at best. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
• Delete without prejudice for recreation when the ships are constructed - right now it's WP:TOOSOON, WP:CRYSTALballing, and (given the fact the ships in question appear to not yet be named at all) WP:HAMMER might be invokable. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 13:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.