Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Bragg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (non-admin closure), as per the consensus in this discussion. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:05, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- Patricia Bragg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Biography that has been tagged since May 2008 for notability sources. I personally feel that it fails to meet WP:NOTE, one of the core rules on Wikipedia. A google search brings up 1+ million results but nothing appears to me to be that important. mboverload@ 22:30, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep She appears to be fairly commonly quoted in the news and has had some things written about her specifically. http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Patricia+Bragg%22+Health+&btnG=Search&ie=UTF-8&um=1 Hobit (talk) 23:45, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep I've got two of her books on my bookshelf, and I am by no means a health nut. From my chair, that means something.--Paul McDonald (talk) 00:48, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- Weak to mild keep based on Hobit's news search. Also, please note that WP:NOTE is not actually one of our Core content policies and should not be described as such, even if it is very widely accepted and useful. --Dhartung | Talk 05:25, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per Hobit looks to have some non-trivial coverage in reliable publications, so that works. JBsupreme (talk) 03:48, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.