Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How We Live: At the Philharmonic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) TheSpecialUser TSU 00:22, 26 November 2012 (UTC)reply

How We Live: At the Philharmonic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUMS CaptainScreebo Parley! 19:49, 28 October 2012 (UTC) CaptainScreebo Parley! 19:49, 28 October 2012 (UTC)reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:53, 30 October 2012 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:40, 5 November 2012 (UTC)reply

  • Keep or Merge to Ian McNabb or a new Ian McNabb discography article. Deleting all these articles Ian McNabb articles isn't going to improve the encyclopedia. He's clearly a notable artist, and we should preserve encyclopedic content. A separate discography article with more detail than is currently in the McNabb article might be the way to go. --Michig (talk) 07:11, 5 November 2012 (UTC)reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ΛΧΣ21 03:12, 12 November 2012 (UTC)reply


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme 02:17, 19 November 2012 (UTC)reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.