Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Design-oriented programming
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:20, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Design-oriented programming (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The topic does not seem to be WP:NOTABLE nor is it WP:VERIFIED by the general references. BlockArranger (talk) 22:52, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. BlockArranger (talk) 22:52, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Wut? There's so little here it's impossible to even work out what should be here and what's missing. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:20, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
- delete The text is all "buzzphrase generator" platitudes, and indeed, the book references I found were largely platitudinous too, except for one for something called DesignScript. Mangoe (talk) 14:41, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - Sounds like a ChatGPT article. No real sources and definitely violates WP:NPOV Shocksingularity (talk) 21:40, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
- This was written almost a decade before ChatGPT was released, so it's not a GPT article. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:43, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
- That always breaks the mind a bit to see LLM style articles written before LLM. Metallurgist (talk) 21:31, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
- This was written almost a decade before ChatGPT was released, so it's not a GPT article. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:43, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per Mangoe. I trust the research that editor puts in. Metallurgist (talk) 21:31, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
Delete Lacks WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. Does not even have a single source to bolster notability. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 22:56, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.