Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaudhry Tahir Mahmood Chahal Jatt
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 17:44, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- Chaudhry Tahir Mahmood Chahal Jatt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Google search only returns results form Facebook, nothing else. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Martin451 23:16, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 23:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Terrible article, but he was a member of a national legislature and is therefore notable under WP:POLITICIAN. -- Necrothesp (talk) 23:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep – I agree with Necrothesp. The article is awful, but he is still fairly notable. United States Man (talk) 02:06, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Do we have a reliable source for his service in Parliament? Without that it's hard to establish notability. This is also a BLP issue. Lagrange613 01:57, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 12:33, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Even though this article is badly written it still falls under WP:POLITICIAN and need a rewrite not be deleted.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 13:10, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. Lagrange613 has a valid point. Is this person really a member of parliament? The subject is not listed on the National Assembly website. The only supplied semi-reliable reference lists another person winning the NA-135 constituency. Only the infobox suggests that the subject is anything more than a local politician. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, http://jang.com.pk/election2002/thenews_sp/03-10-2002/sp_edition10.htm doesn't list him as a winner in 1990 election from NA-129 constituency. No evidence that he has been MP. --Soman (talk) 02:43, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.