Template talk:WikiProject Law
Add topic | Template:WikiProject Law is indefinitely protected from editing as it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify a template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
New classs
[edit]I am adding a category class. A number of the items listed at Category:Unassessed-Class legal articles are really just categories that aren't counted. It should help clear up the backlog immediately. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:07, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Template-class as well now. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
C-Class
[edit]{{editprotected}} Could an administrator please add C-Class to this template's code? --Millbrooky (talk) 05:33, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Done Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 10:51, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
A few changes
[edit]{{editprotected}}
Could an admin please make a few changes:
- change the portal image to File:JudgesTools Icon.png
- see if |category=no is functional, if not please add it.
--Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 10:38, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Done I made these changes. However conversion to WPBannerMeta is advisable. Ruslik (talk) 18:09, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- There's a version in Template:WikiProject_Law/sandbox if you want to convert it over to use WPBannerMeta. -- WOSlinker (talk) 15:28, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
I believe that is a good choice, I will ask the Law Project if they would like to use it. --Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 18:05, 27 December 2008 (UTC) {{editprotected}}Please replace the template with the copy in the sandbox. Martin 17:45, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Done Doesn't look like it broke anything.--Aervanath talks like a mover, but not a shaker 20:17, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Request
[edit]{{Editprotected}} Add ASSESMENT_LINK parameter and add substcheck. SkyBonTalk\Contributions 16:40, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- Please provide more exact instructions about what needs to happen. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 01:29, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
|substcheck=<includeonly>{{subst:</includeonly><includeonly>substcheck}}</includeonly>
|ASSESSMENT_LINK = Wikipedia:WikiProject Law/Assessment
SkyBonTalk\Contributions 06:32, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- Done —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 09:48, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Suggestion for template change
[edit]I have raised an issue about changing the template to allow it to link to more than one portal within the WikiProject's scope at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law#Changing the WP Law template to include a link to Portal:Law of England and Wales. As this page is little-used, it seemed best to start discussion there. Anyone who sees this and has a view, please comment. Thanks, BencherliteTalk 18:42, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 5 February 2026
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the broken link to Wikipedia:WikiProject Law/Assessment#Importance scale to Wikipedia:WikiProject Law/Assessment#Importance assessment. HKLionel TALK 12:06, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- Completed. That link has been anchored and is no longer broken. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. – welcome! – 08:24, 6 February 2026 (UTC)