Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Template talk:WikiProject Doctor Who

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Msgj in topic Reverting this template to pre-meta
[edit]

The logo for this project was a copy of the Tardis. This was a derivative work, and so cannot be freely licensed on Wikipedia. I've removed it for now. I guess we need a new (free) logo. --Tony Sidaway 21:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Two images made from a police box, one is Tardis and one is this. Doctor Who does not hold the copyright on all police boxes, only the trade mark. -- Ned Scott 03:21, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Check the source. The author specifically designed it as a version of the TARDIS. The TARDIS is copyrighted. The image is derivative. Derivative works are prohibited. You can easily use a GFDL version of a normal police box and use that as your logo. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 03:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
That's still a bit absurd given the image, but fine, we'll get another image of a blue police box. -- Ned Scott 03:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

On use of non-free content in template space

[edit]

Eaomatrix has muddied the debate by claiming that restriction on non-free content applies only to userspace. This is incorrect. See criterion 9 of the Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria: Non-free content is used only in article namespaces; it is never used on templates (including stub templates and navigation boxes) or on user pages.

The more recently added TARDIS-trans.png may be free, though I'm not sure of that. --Tony Sidaway 13:27, 13 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reverting this template to pre-meta

[edit]

The meta template is severely broken, and it is not getting fixed. I am reverting this back to pre-meta. - LA (T) 20:21, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have reimplemented. It should not be broken now! Please let me know if there are any problems. Martin 12:20, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply