Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Template talk:User talk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Jonesey95 in topic Edit request 19 March 2026

Question

[edit]

Would anyone object to my changing

"We, Wikipedians, dislike fragmented discussions."

to something along the lines of

"I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented."

I don't know that there's a prevailing consensus on where people choose to reply, so the former seems a bit presumptious. --Sugarbutty 09:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I agree, although it seems to me that the majority of users prefer to keep discussions in one place, not all users do. Also because of the way the sentence is written, with the commas, its meaning is ambiguous so I don't know if that was the intended meaning or not - I prefer your version. The sentence has been in the template since the template was created in 2006, however I wouldn't object to it being changed. --Snigbrook (talk) 09:50, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Right, ok, I'll give it a go, see how it goes down. Cheers. --Sugarbutty 10:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

text change proposal

[edit]

{{editprotected}} I'd like to propose a slight change to the text, replacing "do that" with "start a new discussion". I'm concerned that users will be encouraged to create a new heading every time they post a comment, even if it's part of the same discussion. Dancter (talk) 17:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Not done for now: Can you provide some examples where this is actually happening as a big problem?--Aervanath (talk) 08:59, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
A big problem? I actually wasn't expecting any resistance on this. I don't really want to dig through revision histories to provide diffs. It'd be easier to just make my own header. Thanks, anyway. Dancter (talk) 10:55, 29 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Edit request from Cymru.lass, 31 December 2010

[edit]

{{edit protected}} Please move the documentation to a /doc subpage. --- cymru.lass (hit me up)(background check) 05:58, 31 December 2010 (UTC) cymru.lass (hit me up)(background check) 05:58, 31 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

 Done   Tivedshambo  (t/c) 13:44, 31 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Edit request from A. di M., 6 March 2011

[edit]

{{edit protected}} Just a nit-pick: the en dashes in “this same page–my talk page–as an effort” should be either spaced (“this same page  my talk page  as an effort”) or replaced with em dashes (“this same pagemy talk pageas an effort”), per WP:DASH and Dash#En dash versus em dash. Either would be OK with me, though I'd personally choose the spaced en dashes.

A. di M. (talk) 15:28, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

 Done. This is also one of my nit-picky pet peeves. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:32, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Template-protected edit request on 27 November 2018

[edit]

I would like to request that the following be changed:

"please do it at the bottom as a new section, for better formatting."

to instead read,

"please do it at the bottom as a new section for better formatting."

I don't see why the comma between "section" and "for" is there. Commas may be used to set off appositive phrases, but in this case the comma just separates one prepositional phrase from the other two. If I'm missing something here, let me know! Paper Luigi TC 08:40, 27 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

 Done. I added a comma after "bottom", since "as a new section" is an appositive phrase. I hope that is acceptable to you; it looked like the best option to me. Thanks for pointing out this grammar error. – Jonesey95 (talk) 10:45, 27 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
That's fine with me! Thanks for your quick reply to this long-overlooked grammatical error. Paper Luigi TC 12:34, 27 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Template-protected edit request on 22 March 2019

[edit]

Please remove the line <noinclude>{{pp-template|small=yes}}</noinclude> - protection templates are automatically handled by the documentation page. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 06:40, 22 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

 DoneJJMC89(T·C) 06:54, 22 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Template-protected edit request on 23 October 2024

[edit]
Remember, we can use our [[special:watchlist|watchlist]] to keep track of when responses are made
+
Remember, we can use our [[special:watchlist|watchlist]] and [[WP:SUBSCRIBE|topic subscriptions]] to keep track of when responses are made

Request to add link to WP:SUBSCRIBE, for another easy way to monitor talk pages, in fact easier than monitoring a large talk page on a watchlist.

Thanks! Bunnypranav (talk) 15:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

 Completed. P.I. Ellsworth, ed. put'er there 02:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Edit request 19 March 2026

[edit]

Description of suggested change: On my user talk page, it says "Add topic" to start a new topic. I would like that covered in this template so any new Wikipedians don't get lost looking for something to click that isn't there. Thanks!

Diff:

pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section"
+
pressing the plus sign (+), "new section" or "Add topic"

Stefen 𝕋ower HuddleHandiwerk 19:51, 19 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

 DoneJonesey95 (talk) 14:42, 21 March 2026 (UTC)Reply