Template talk:User incl
Add topicLatest comment: 18 years ago by Scartol in topic Phil link?
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Phil link?
[edit]I don't understand why a link was made to Conflicting_Wikipedia_philosophies. Inclusionism isn't even mentioned on the page. What was wrong with the old design? – Scartol · Talk 02:11, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- It's the overview page. And inclusionism is listed on the template on that page. - jc37 09:58, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, but as a user with no knowledge of inclusionism, I would read the page itself first, and be confused when I didn't find it. I liked the old design. – Scartol · Talk 13:24, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
alternative design
[edit]Available at: Template:User Inclusionist
Note that this template will automatically detect your name unless you define the comment field.
 | This User is an inclusionist. |