Template talk:Relevance
Add topicLatest comment: 4 years ago by 5.43.73.144 in topic Redirecting (parameter addition proposal as alt)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Relevance redirect. |
|
Redirecting (parameter addition proposal as alt)
[edit]This template shouldn't redirect to a section-only template. Its name doesn't convey that at all. I'd suggest redirecting it to {{importance}}, or perhaps adding an |article or section= parameter to {{importance}}, and merge {{importance-section}} into it. Or even better, instead of a simple redirect (#REDIRECT [[template:importance]]), using {{importance|section}}. What do you think? Waldir talk 15:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- @Waldir: It should not redirect to section-only template at all. It is not about name but content i.e. meaning (applies for whole article and not section only at the same time). Why do you say "to {{importance}}"?! That is this template... Parameter addition is actually solution, merging, and bot correcting across articles that use relevance section or importance section (to replace that with {{relevance|section). --5.43.73.144 (talk) 19:57, 29 June 2022 (UTC)