Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Template talk:Number of relations

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Abm9856 in topic number of irreflexive relations

Surely {} and {(x,x)} are both reflexive binary relations over {x}? (Hence there are 2 reflexive binary relations over a 1-element set.) Hairy Dude 23:07, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

"Reflexive" means that x must be related to itself. This is true for {(x,x)} but not for {}. —David Eppstein 00:21, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Yes. {} is reflexive over {}, but not over {x}. CRGreathouse (t | c) 03:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

How to denote shifted OEIS?

[edit]

The number of the symmetric relations on an n element set is 2^(n-th triangular number), which is not in OEIS, only a shifted version of it. That is linked currently, but it is not denoted, that it is shifted. I am somehow satisfied how the template looks now, and I don't think it needs further clarification, yet, if there is a way for it, it can be done. Thanks, 157.181.151.144 (talk) 14:54, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

The number of symmetric relations on an n-element set is A006125(n+1). - CRGreathouse (t | c) 16:17, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

number of irreflexive relations

[edit]

It might be worth noting that the number of irreflexive relations is the same as the number of reflexive relations. Abm9856 (talk) 18:30, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply