Template talk:HTML editors

Text HTML editors

Per HTML editor#Text editors, the bare minimum for something to be considered an HTML editor is syntax highlighting. Editors such as Scintilla, Notepad2, Notepad++, et al. should be included here for that reason.
--Gyrobo (talk) 14:17, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Support! By all means go ahead and add them all. I agree. We have consensus; weep the tears of joy or something. (:LOL:) Fleet Command (talk) 16:39, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Our consensus was all of them; but you added only Scintilla-based. A lapse of memory, perhaps? Fleet Command (talk) 07:47, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Froala Editor's custom license definetly doesn't qualify as free software or open source. It should be removed from the open source section. --Pelle — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.182.54.78 (talk) 18:03, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

My edit got reverted

I tried to add Sublime Text to this template and it got removed. As Notepad2 and Sublime Text both have wikipedia pages, they should be added to this template. --desbest (talk) 22:04, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Sublime is fine, just a minor technical issue with the edit itself, so added it again. — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 22:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Inclusion of non-notable programs

A recent anon-editor insists on adding a link to a program which doesn't have a topic and doesn't appear likely to pass scrutiny on creating an appropriate topic, because all of the apparent sources for this program are advertisements by its developers TEDickey (talk) 21:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Removed the link per WP:EXISTING. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 13:57, 28 March 2025 (UTC)