Template talk:Antipopes
Add topic| The content of Template:Western Schism was merged into Template:Antipopes on 27 October 2019. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| On 5 September 2026, it was proposed that this page be moved from Template:Western Schism to Template:Antipopes. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Untitled
[edit]This was originally created by Gparker. I just made it a template. You should refer to him if you have questions, a feature request, or want to thank him for making this. savidan(talk) (e@) 18:39, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Name of template
[edit]I think the name of the template possibly needs to be looked at. The template's title is currently "Antipopes" and it includes links to the articles of Antipopes going back to antiquity and through to modern day figures who claim to be Pope. This means that the majority of those included actually have nothing to do with the Western Schism. Also as the template focuses on articles Antipopes it does not include articles which relate to topics relevant to the Western Schism. For example Jean Gerson who was a key figure in ending the Schism or relevant events such as the Council of Constance, the ecumenical councils which ended the Schism. The Council of Pisa is listed, but only to denote the line of Pisan Antipopes. Thus I think if the template is to focus on all Antipopes then it should be renamed probably Template:Antipopes to more accurately reflect its use and content, as the current name is not really helpful. Dunarc (talk) 23:55, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Request to remove Pope Michael I and II from Antipopes template
[edit]I propose to remove Pope Michael I and Pope Michael II from the "Antipopes"-template. The term Antipope refers to individuals who were rival claimants to that position (and in opposition to another pope) within the same Church. However, this does not accurately describe Bawden’s position and that of his successor.
David Bawden (Pope Michael I) claimed that the See of Peter had been vacant since the death of Pope Pius XII in 1958. He believed that Vatican II constituted a new church, with distinct faith and rituals. Therefore, he did not set himself up in opposition to a reigning pope, but rather saw himself as filling a sede vacante situation. In his view, the “Conciliar Church” was an entirely different religion occupying once Catholic structures.
Labeling him and his successor as an Antipope" is misleading, as it assumes a competing claim against another pope, which he did not express (neither in writing nor in other media). On the contrary, Bawden explicitly criticized traditionalist groups (e.g. SSPX) for rejecting decrees of the hierarchy they consider legitimate. He emphasised that such disobedience is contrary to Catholic dogma.
Sources: - Bawden, *What We Believe*: https://www.scribd.com/document/143226905/What-We-Believe - Bawden, *Traditionalists Admit They Have No Authority*: https://www.scribd.com/document/391186437/Traditionalists-Admit-They-Have-No-Authority - Archived: *Will the Catholic Church Survive the Twentieth Century?* https://web.archive.org/web/20131203045958/http://www.scribd.com/doc/15948721/Will-the-Catholic-Church-Survive-the-Twentieth-Century - Video (Bawden on authority): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VixS8f4fm9U
I recommend therefor to remove both Pope Michael I and Pope Michael II from the template, and maybe creating a new navigational template, for example **conclavist popes**, as this would be a more accurate and neutral classification.
Requested move 5 September 2026
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) squawk7700 (talk) 14:39, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
Template:Western Schism → Template:Antipopes – Since the template focuses on antipopes, most of the listed ones having nothing to do with the Western Schism. Nor does the template discuss any other topics related to the Western Schism. Illini11 (talk) 19:27, 5 September 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 17:55, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
- The former Template:Antipopes was merged here as a result of a previous discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 August 13#Template:Antipopes. Dekimasuよ! 16:08, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
- Support per nom; Template:Western Schism can be a redirect to Template:Antipopes. Helpful Cat🐈⬛ 07:19, 19 September 2026 (UTC)