Talk:Zero Focus

Japan: Cinema Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks.JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese cinema task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations:
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Film: Japanese

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Japanese cinema task force.

A couple issues

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This is a good start to the article, especially that referencing was used. However, there were a couple issues that wouldn't all fit into an edit summary, so, I'm going to list them here.

The two plot summaries were copy violations, per WP:COPYVIO
the IMDb is not a reliable source (I left the award ref for now as I couldn't find an alternate), per WP:RS
Trivia sections are discouraged, per WP:TRIVIA
Technical specs qualify as indiscriminate information (maybe they could be worked into a Production section), per WP:NOT#STATS
External links should be kept to a minimum as well, meaning Rotten Tomatoes is good enough review-wise, per WP:EL

Seems like a lot but otherwise it's a good beginning. Doctor Sunshine talk 06:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've rewritten the plot section (just saw the film yesterday, so memory is fresh) and swapped IMDb links for more reliable refs. Robert Kerber (talk) 13:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A couple issues