Talk:Yakusugi

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks.JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Flora and fauna task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations:
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Forestry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the profession and science of forestry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plants Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WP: Japan Assessment Commentary

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article appears to have serious problems. Aside from its lack of references, the Lead states:

"The term "Yakusugi" refers to trees that are more than 1,000 years old." -- a statement that misses the pretty obvious connection to Yakushima, as evidenced not only by the yaku- phoneme, but the use of the same kanji. On this point, I was tempted to mark it as Stub-class, since there is no way to know how much more of the article has misleading information. Boneyard90 (talk) 18:02, 29 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I retranslated the lede off of the Japanese article. The original does qualify the Yakusugi as the trees from Yakushima, and it must have been a unwitting omission in the process of translation.

I'm not sure about how sound the definition is either. The Ja article at least now gives one source, a bulletin from an "administrative corporation" that endorses the 1,000+ Yakusugi, younger kosugi definition, but it's not footnoted. My cursory search didn't turn up further sources, within a short time turn around, and that will have to do for now.--Kiyoweap (talk) 12:28, 28 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

WP: Japan Assessment Commentary